Connect with us

News

Union leaders explain why they’re demanding an end to US aid to Israel

Published

on

Union leaders explain why they're demanding an end to US aid to Israel

The death toll in Gaza continues to climb, with conservative estimates putting the numbers of dead around 40,000, but a recent report in the British medical journal The Lancet estimates the actual death toll could be 186,000 or even higher—that’s roughly 8% of Gaza’s population. And with each passing day, the humanitarian crises unfolding in Gaza and the West Bank gets orders of magnitude worse.

Seeing the dire situation in Palestine, seven major US labor unions collectively drafted, signed, and sent a letter to President Biden demanding that US military aid to Israel stop immediately. The letter reads, in part: “Large numbers of Palestinian civilians, many of them children, continue to be killed, reportedly often with US-manufactured bombs. Rising tensions in the region threaten to ensnare even more innocent civilians in a wider war. And the humanitarian crisis deepens by the day, with famine, mass displacement, and destruction of basic infrastructure including schools and hospitals. We have spoken directly to leaders of Palestinian trade unions who told us heart-wrenching stories of the conditions faced by working people in Gaza.”

In this episode, TRNN Editor-in-Chief Maximillian Alvarez and Staff Reporter Mel Buer speak with George Waksmunski, president of the United Electrical, Radio, & Machine Workers of America (UE), Eastern Region, and Brandon Mancilla, Region 9A Director for the United Auto Workers, about why their unions signed onto this call for an end to US aid to Israel and what organized labor can do to end the genocide in Gaza.

Advertisement

Additional links/info below…

Permanent links below…

Featured Music…
Jules Taylor, “Working People” Theme Song


Transcript

The following is a rushed transcript and may contain errors. A proofread version will be made available as soon as possible.

George Waksmunski:

Advertisement

Hello, my name’s George Waksmunkski. I’m the UE Eastern Region President. That’s the United Electrical Radio Machine Workers of America, UE. I oversee 14 states for UE from North Carolina, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and New York and all the way up through New England and everything in between. I’m very happy to be here and be part of this conversation. Thank you.

Brandon Mancilla:

I’m Brandon Mancilla, the UAW Region 9A director. We represent 50,000 active and retired members from New York to Maine and Puerto Rico and Region 9A director sits on the International Executive Board of the International UAW.

Mel Buer:

Advertisement

Welcome back everyone to another episode of Working People, a podcast about the lives, jobs, dreams and struggles of the working class today. Brought to you in partnership with In These Times magazine and The Real News Network, produced by Jules Taylor and made possible by the support of listeners like you. Working People is a proud member of the Labor Radio Podcast Network. If you’re hungry for more worker and labor focus shows like ours, follow the link in the show notes and go check out the other great shows in our network. And please support the work we’re doing here at Working People because we can’t keep going without you. Share our episodes with your coworkers, friends and family members. Leave positive reviews of the show on Spotify and Apple Podcasts and reach out to us if you have recommendations for working folks you’d like us to talk to.

And please also support the work we do at The Real News Network by going to therealnews.com/donate, especially if you want to see more reporting from the front lines of struggle across the US and across the world. My name is Mel Buer.

Maximillian Alvarez:

And I’m Maximillian Alvarez.

Advertisement

Mel Buer:

And today, we’re bringing the focus back to the ongoing genocide in Palestine and the role that organized labor is playing to try and stop it. In July, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s scorching address to Congress in which he vowed, “Total victory in Palestine,” and called American protesters standing in opposition to the genocide, “Useful idiots,” earned him a standing ovation for many US representatives and underscored, yet again, the deep involvement of the US in the ongoing carnage.

Maximillian Alvarez:

Over the last year, both Mel and I have sat down with many workers and organizers who have been agitating within their unions to pressure leadership to take a public stance against the genocide in Palestine and to draw attention to the US involvement in Israel’s brutal campaign. Since October 7th, the United States government has sent more than $12 billion, that’s billion with a B, to Israel, with billions more earmarked for the next four years. The death toll in Gaza continues to climb with conservative estimates putting the numbers of dead near 40,000, but a recent report in the British Medical Journal, The Lancet, estimates the death toll could be far greater than that, over 186,000 people or more. That’s roughly 8% of Gaza’s population. And with each passing day, the humanitarian crisis unfolding in Gaza gets orders of magnitude worse.

Advertisement

Seeing the dire situation in Palestine seven major US labor unions have collectively drafted, signed and sent a letter to President Biden demanding that US military aid to Israel stop immediately. The letter reads, in part, “Recent reports only underscore the urgency of our demands. Large numbers of Palestinian civilians, many of them children, continue to be killed, reportedly often with US manufactured bombs. Rising tensions in the region threaten to ensnare even more innocent civilians in a wider war. And the humanitarian crisis deepens by the day with famine, mass displacement and destruction of basic infrastructure including schools and hospitals. We have spoken directly to leaders of Palestinian trade unions who told us heart-wrenching stories of the conditions faced by working people in Gaza.”

Mel Buer:

The seven unions, the Association of Flight Attendance Communication Workers of America or AFACWA, the American Postal Workers Union, APWU, the International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, IUPAT, the National Education Association, NEA, the Service Employees International Union, SEIU, the United Auto Workers, UAW, and the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers, UE, collectively represent about 6 million American workers. As Alex Press reported in Jacobin, this letter to Biden is a product of relationships built through the National Labor Network for Ceasefire, a coalition of unions that formed around a statement initially sponsored by UE and UFCW International Union Local 3000, that statement called on Biden and Congress to “push for an immediate ceasefire, an end to the siege of Gaza”, stopping short of calling for an end to US military aid to Israel.

This new letter represents a significant escalation in pressure from the US labor movement and an effort to address this ongoing humanitarian catastrophe with us today to discuss this important escalation in the campaign to pressure the US to end its involvement in Israel are Brandon Mancilla and George Waksmunski.

Advertisement

Maximillian Alvarez:

Well, gentlemen, it’s so great to have you on the show today. We really appreciate you all making time for this. We know how busy you are, but we know that you know how important this issue is to all of us as human beings, as fellow workers and to the unions that you represent and the union members that you represent. And I really want to pick up on that last point Mel was talking about in the introduction about how this has been building over the course of months, if not years, right? This strong forceful push from organized labor to oppose the brutal occupation and genocidal violence happening in Palestine is something that UE has been on the frontlines of, really a leader in the labor movement.

And I was wondering if we could start with George going back there and talk a little bit for our listeners about the Labor Network for Ceasefire, like how it was formed and the UE’s role in pushing this call for a ceasefire and now an end to military aid to Israel within the US labor movement. And then, Brandon, I’d love for you to hop in and talk about UAW as well, your president, Shawn Fain of course being one of the earliest and most vocal union leaders to call for a ceasefire earlier this year. So, George, give our listeners a little background here on UE’s role in this fight and how far that goes back.

George Waksmunski:

Advertisement

Sure. Thank you very much, brother. Well, UE has been in this for a very long time. For many decades, we’ve had a policy about the situation in Palestine and Gaza and as it relates to Israel. So that goes back many decades. And every two years, we have a national convention and we take up resolutions which our members ultimately vote on. And so again, for each of those conventions over the decades, similar resolutions were passed. In 2015, we passed a resolution called Justice and Peace for the People of Palestine and Israel and that called for an end military aid to Israel back then. It also endorsed BDS, boycott, divest and sanction, because we believe that Israel is acting similar to an apartheid state and that’s how apartheid was dismantled, at least one part of it. And so we were the first union to sign onto that back in 2015.

And again, every two years since then when we’ve had our conventions and we’ve had similar resolutions regarding military aid to Israel and calling for peace between the two parties, calling for a two-state solution. So this last convention in 2023, that resolution come up again, and again, we passed that resolution, calling for an end to all military aid to Israel. And that was about two weeks before the horrific attack of the citizens of Israel that occurred. So even prior to that, we were already calling for an end to military aid to Israel. So once the attack occurred and after several weeks of seeing how this was playing out, we were already in a position, long held, to be able to take the lead on it and that’s what we did.

As you mentioned, we initiated along with the UFCW 3000 a petition to get all labor unions signed onto to call for a ceasefire. Since then, our members have been out in the streets rallying, protesting on college campuses, at congressmen and senators’ offices, doors, wherever we can catch those folks to give them help. And fortunately, Congresswoman Summer Lee here in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is a strong advocate for peace in the Middle East and a two-state solution, so we’ve got a good congresswoman here. But so again, as the months have gone on, yes, we’ve been part of the National Labor Network for Ceasefire, working and gathering other unions into the coalition and we weren’t seeing any …

I mean, we got a lot of false hope given to us about a potential ceasefire and about a potential ceasefire and about a potential ceasefire, but it never happened. And we knew it never was going to happen, because Netanyahu, that’s not his goal, that’s not his road to success and the United States just backs Israel no matter what and even if it means that we’re going to be involved in genocide, supporting it with our bombs that we make. So again, we’ve put together our coalition to now put forward this letter to President Biden, going more than just calling for a ceasefire, but an end to all military aid to Israel, especially during this time.

Advertisement

So we’ve always been at the forefront of this and we’re very proud and excited by the number of national unions that you read off and especially the UAW and being part of this. And we are excited, because in the past, these things took years and years to get a coalition together. In this, it took seven months. So there’s a change going on, I think, not only in our membership, but at the leadership levels as well, to understand that the injury to one is an injury to all. Because there was a time in our history back during the Red Scare when McCarthyism, part of that was to silence unions from being active in political affairs, international affairs such as this. And for a long time, that worked. And although UE has never been silent on it, a lot of other unions on various issues have been.

So we’re very excited to see the other unions stepping forward as quickly as they are, even though in some cases it might seem like it’s been too long, but it is progress and we’re excited by it. Thanks.

Brandon Mancilla:

Thanks for having me on. I think just to add to George, unions like UE and Mark Dimondstein, his leadership with the postal workers and some of the other unions originally listed in that letter that UE helped lead really paved the way. I think it was really smart to realize that this moment was, number one, the demand needed to be serious of our government and of our elected officials to be held accountable to find a pathway to peace and the retaliatory violence that Israel was going to set upon after the October 7th attack by Hamas, right? But I think they also realized that it wasn’t going to be enough to just rally the same unions that have internationalist stance or a solid progressive stance on this issue. It needed to be an opening to the rest of the labor movement and I really commend, I think, UE and Mark and so many others for doing that because I think it forced the rest of the labor movement to have this conversation.

Advertisement

So I think intertwined with that is the fact that the international UAW has been going through its own reform process over the last few years. The election of Shawn Fain after one member, one vote, and my slate, which we ran with Shawn and the big three, Stand Up Strike and our commitment to new organizing, I think this is another chapter in that story. I think it’s in the same book that we’re writing and I think that’s been powered by our members. So I think two things played a factor in us joining that call in December, one being that a lot of our members, especially in Regions, 9A, mine, and Region 6, but also in places like Dearborn, Michigan, took to the streets and demanded peace, demanded a ceasefire from October 8th, right?

And why October 8th? Because everyone knew what was coming after October 7th, right? So they didn’t have to wait until November, December, January to know the scale of the violence that was going to be unleashed on the people at Gaza, right? So what happened thereafter was a lot of street protests demanding that we wouldn’t see the scale of suffering. That didn’t happen, of course. We supplied the weapons. Israel began its counteroffensive and led to the death of tens of thousands, which the numbers only increased and I do think that it’s far higher than the conservative estimate of the round 38,000 to 40,000 that most media outlets report nowadays.

And I think, with those members going out to the streets, they were demanding that their union, I think realign their own politics around this issue. I think that’s the key part of this. It wasn’t just, “Oh, I just happened to be a UAW member,” or, “I happen to be a union member,” or, “I happen to be a university staff member,” “I am doing this. I’m out on the streets also as a member of my union, not just as an average citizen, as an average worker. I want my protest also to be seen as a demand of my own union to join this explicitly,” right? And I think those were the conversations that started to happen, within local unions, within our political councils. Eventually 5 and 9A, explicitly as political councils, came out in support of a ceasefire sign on to the letter that UE mobilized and that gave myself and Director Mike Miller the leverage to be able to take that to the International Executive Board, have conversations with people like Shawn Fain and others on the International Executive Board to educate and inform.

Shawn was very supportive from the very beginning on being vocal on this. We just needed to find new way to do it. And at the International Executive Board at the end of November, we decided to sign on. So between October and December 1st when we finally came out. We were definitely early on in the sense that a lot of the major unions who have usually been silent or ignorant or on Israel’s side, on critically on this when these bombing campaigns would happen. We’re early in breaking with that silence or changing course, but we weren’t the first ones obviously, but I think our leadership on this, when we did come out, did allow an even further opening of the door for other unions to come out.

Advertisement

And I think that’s when you saw the numerous local unions, central labor councils, international unions, and then eventually, the AFL-CIO itself come out for a ceasefire. And now I think the discussion is like, “Well, listen, we’re now seven months after this kind of momentous moment of labor union ceasefire statements. What’s next?” right? And I think that’s what this escalation is with the letter to call for halt of arms. And I just think the key thing to remember through this process is that it is a process of political education for our own unions, right? It’s not fast enough, but it’s also historic. So those both things are happening at the same time, and at the end of the day, this is not going to end until peace is secured and there’s a true path to justice for the Palestinian people.

Mel Buer:

Thank you for that. Brandon, I wanted to direct this question to you first. We’ve talked about why calls for permanent ceasefire were really the start or temporary, a ceasefire, and now we’re seeing through, what is it now, months of negotiations, almost reaching an agreement or one side agreeing and then Israel walking back or broken promises that the Biden administration has spent a lot of time saying, “We’re close,” or these negotiations are breaking down for one reason or another, or at some point, it seems like almost a cynical sort of ploy for votes in November sometimes, right? And so I really want to drive home, one, Israel is receiving at least every year until 2028 3.8 billion in military funding from the United States. I think it’s something like 15% of the Israeli defense budget is made up of money that comes from the United States, which is wild to me, right?

I guess I want to ask, why do you think this is the appropriate pressure on Israel to really hone in on the US pulling back its military aid in a way to pressure them to actually accept the terms of a permanent ceasefire in this conflict?

Advertisement

Brandon Mancilla:

I think that’s a great question. I think there’s a few reasons. The first one that comes to mind is precisely because of what you pointed out, that the amount of political backing, arms, resources we supply and arms we supply to the state of Israel is astronomical, right? I think it’s not an exaggeration to say that President Biden could make a phone call and end this war today, right? How the state of Israel reacts to that is a separate question, but they cannot carry out the scale of violence without our support as the United States as a country, right? At the UN, it’s a countless international bodies, right? In front of the international courts. We are consistently one of few allies that the state of Israel has to give what it’s doing right now, legitimacy or coverup, right?

And I think that’s really important for us as leaders within the labor movement to emphasize for our own membership and for our ability to wage our own political stance, is to say, “We know we are complicit and responsible in ways in which we are not over the actions of a group like Hamas. And we are not and disproportionately in this conflict over so many others,” right? This is why it’s not because people want to talk about Israel more than other countries, it’s because we are directly involved and complicit in ways that really far outweigh anything else. So I think that’s really important.

I think, second, the fact that this opens up the door to talk about the fact about our defense budget, right? The fact that we spend so much on defense, on military spending in lieu of actually trying to solve deep social crises in this country of inequality, of healthcare, of food access, of education, of so many social goods that working people need, union and non-union alike, to be able to survive and make stable good lives in this country. So these things are all intertwined to each other. And I think, even though the majority of the defense industry is not unionized, there is some union representation within defense, right?

Advertisement

So we don’t make the corporate decisions that these defense contractors and manufacturers make and we’re not out there signing the contracts with foreign governments, our own government about supplying weapons, but ultimately, many workers do make the arms that end up getting sent, the bombs, the arms, tanks, etcetera to different foreign wars and conflicts. And I think that means that we have also responsibility to say, “We have to have an economy that is able to run in a different way under humane principles.”

Maximillian Alvarez:

I want to hop in here and definitely ask both of you from your respective vantage points at the UE and UAW, what response you’ve gotten from the Biden administration, if any at all, and also from your own members? I’d love to just hear a bit more about that. But, George, I was wondering if we could start with you and if you could tug on that thread a little bit more. When you mentioned the Red Scare, when you mentioned the role that organized labor used to play as a force fighting for social good and fighting for political causes that it’s the labor movement saw as fundamentally intertwined with our ultimate goal to make life better and the world better for working people across the board.

And it seems as if over the past 50, 60, 70 years, and we can’t go into the whole history there about why unions have taken less and less of a strong political stance, deindustrialization, offshoring, the open season on organized labor from the 1980s on, all of these things, of course, compound and put additional pressure on unions to basically be a bit more guarded over what they have while they’re losing so much over the course of the past few decades. But at that same time, unions as political engines for expressing the political will of working people have been largely captured by just this idea that we can endorse a presidential candidate or our job is to endorse and support candidates or parties, but that’s really it.

Advertisement

And yet, you have more independent unions like UE and the International Longshore and Warehouse Workers Union who played a critical role in striking against the apartheid in South Africa. I just wanted to ask if you could tug a little more on that for our listeners and with your experience and your union’s history, if you could say a little more about how unions got so complacent when it came to taking strong political stances like this and how you see that changing now. And then I would love to hear from both of you about what response you’ve gotten from the Biden administration, all the way down to your members.

George Waksmunski:

There’s a lot there for me to cover. Well, we’ve always been a union that believed in independent political action. We’ve never been a union to get in bed with the Democratic Party. We think we’ve long believed that both parties are corrupt and do not serve our best interest, especially since the McCarthyism and the Red Scare when the unions were divided and they just busted up the militancy of the labor movement to the degree that unions were running scared because of the McCarthy effect and UE was attacked severely. We were almost killed. It’s taken us decades to overcome all of that.

So an example, I think we were a pretty good example to other unions about why you need to fall in line. And I can’t speak for other unions or what their history is or what their thinking was, but we’ve always seen ourselves as being a union that is not in the mainstream and it comes from our principles of aggressive struggle and militancy and the members have to run the union from the bottom to the top. When the members are running the union from the bottom to the top and it’s their nickels and dimes they’re fighting for, they tend to be a little more militant about it when they believe that they have some investment in their union, some control over their union. And they really do in UE. Anything that happens at the local level is all the members business. We don’t get involved with that.

Advertisement

So we’ve always had this history of being militant and being aggressive. It’s written into our preamble and that the members run the union. So the feedback we’ve gotten from our members has been positive for our positions for the most part. Certainly, there’s every once in a while some member who’s expressing his right to speak hot and disagree with us and that’s okay. That’s healthy. We embrace that. But for the most part and overall, members from coast to coast are out in the street on their own with our support and approval. We have to give them approval. They run the union, but they’re out there in the street and on the campuses picketing and protesting. I’m leaving right now after this to go speak at a rally over to University of Pittsburgh.

So again, during that period of McCarthyism, it just really destroyed the labor movement because there was factions that were very militant and those factions were one by one annihilated. And we were one of the only ones surviving, us, the Longshoremen, maybe the United Mine Workers. I’m not sure if they were in there as well, but there aren’t too many of us left. And the other unions, they fell in line. They signed the pledge, the non-Communist pledge, which we refused to do for many, many years. Ultimately, we had to surrender or we would’ve died. So we’ve been through some tough struggles in our history and we’ve learned some hard lessons, some good lessons, lessons we always knew, but sometimes you got to stand up for your principles and even if it costs you and it nearly costs us, but we still have our principles and we are thriving today even after all of that.

So on response from the Biden administration, to my knowledge, we’ve not gotten any. I think I would’ve been notified of that. I did talk to our national president, Carl Rosen, in the last 24 hours about this call. So he did brief me on some things that I should know or share with you and he did not say anything about a response. So I don’t believe we got anything.

Mel Buer:

Advertisement

Brandon, do you want to share? I don’t know if Fain has gotten any sort of notification from the administration that they even acknowledged that the letter freaking exists or has there been communication just from the rank and file in general about the direction that the UAW and this coalition are moving towards in terms of their call for ending military aid? What has been the response that you’ve gotten on your end?

Brandon Mancilla:

Yeah, so as you can imagine, when we did not endorse Biden last year and also had our Stand Up Strike, which had a lot to do with the way that subsidies to companies were being dished out by the Biden administration for the transition to EVs and battery plant assembly, etcetera, the Biden administration took note of that and got very involved in our contract negotiations. They did not … Ultimately, that’s not what made the difference, right? What made the difference was our strike and our membership power, but we opened the door to the Biden administration in order to basically set a new tone, which is to say, “From now on when you build these new assembly plants for EVs and batteries, etcetera, you’re going to have to keep labor in mind. You’re going to have to set labor standards. You’re going to have to regulate these places for health and safety standards. They’re really dangerous plants. And also you’re going to have to make this a just transition. If we’re going to actually accelerate EV production, it’s going to have to be a just transition,” right?

So I think that was the beginning I think of conversations with the Biden administration, and then of course, October 7th and the war on Gaza came right around this time, right in the middle towards the end of our strike, right? So when we passed our ceasefire resolution, and since then, Shawn has been very blunt with the president, President Biden about our union’s position. I personally had a little bit of a flareup with Biden’s staff when I wasn’t allowed to go on stage with my ceasefire stickers on. I was ultimately, but they threatened that Biden would leave if I was up there. I didn’t give that up. And ultimately, nothing happened. He went up there, gave a speech for our endorsement and also I had my stickers on. But after that, Shawn has been very clear to him, this is especially after the uncommitted vote in Michigan especially, that, “You’re going to lose this election in places like Michigan because there’s no change in direction,” right?

Advertisement

And unfortunately, we haven’t seen a dramatic change in course. Some rhetorical I think changes, I think a commitment to find a framework and negotiate towards a ceasefire, but no real actual I think leverage from the government to actually make it happen. And recently in conversations with the Harris team, since Biden stepped down from the candidacy, I know that President Fain has also brought up the fact that we have to see a change in course on Gaza and we also have sent that letter demanding and to arm shipments and did not expect the Harris team nor anyone in the administration to immediately, I think, change course because of those things, right? It’s going to be continued pressure and growing to movement that’s going to ultimately, I think, deliver.

But I think, in part, what we saw from Kamala Harris in that press conference she gave after she met with Netanyahu, I think that is in part because of the continual pressure, right? Because of pressure from the labor unions and generally just I think the US public, is at a place where they just don’t want to see this happening anymore. So a ceasefire, I think, if you poll the majority of Americans, they want to see an end to war and genocide and that’s it, right? So I think you can call that political calculation. I don’t know what you can call it, whatever, but I think they’ve taken note of it. And I think we just have to see now with continued pressure, continued mobilization, how much the Democratic Party will want to change course.

And I think events that happened this week in Iran, I think, are going to be really indicative how the US responds to the assassination of a key Hamas leader through the peace talks.

Mel Buer:

Advertisement

I think that’s a really good of segue into our final question to wrap up the conversation. This question is for both of you, Brandon, if you’d like to start. Now that the letter has been published and we see groups like Jewish Voice for Peace and Students for Justice in Palestine also picking up this thread to calling for an end to US military aid to Israel, I think it’s an important way to end this conversation by really bringing it back to a call to action for those who are listening. What can rank-and-file union members or organizers workers, individuals who care, what can they do to join this anti-genocide movement and how can we continue to keep this pressure up? What are the things that you think of?

Brandon Mancilla:

Well, I think just to start from the UAW side, the UAW 4811, the 48,000 academic workers of the University of California, I think that something historic in going on strike against the unfair labor practices that the university committed when they repressed protests and silence speech on campus during the encampment period. So I think the fact that we had our first ever … George, you can correct me, but I think it was the first ever authorized strike for Palestine. I think that’s a historic breakthrough. So what UAW 4811, I think that it goes … Honestly, to me, it’s like the biggest advancement of this movement beyond statements and letters, which are all important, but to actually go out on the line defending your co-workers for the simple right to speak out against injustices is crucial because that’s what the labor should be about, aside from also fighting for our benefits and our wages and so many other protections we need on the job. This one’s just as important.

So I would say, for workers across different industries, just know that having a voice on the job is protected. That’s important, right? And if your boss is retaliating against you for political activity, union activity, you have rights and you can organize around that and I think that’s really important. Similarly, I think this wasn’t a strike, but Local 2325 in my region represents public defenders and legal services workers across New York City. Many of those unions, those units within the amalgamated local have passed their own ceasefire resolutions. Ultimately, this became a solidarity resolution that then some of our pro-Israel members sued the local four, which made us exploded it into a whole legal fiasco, which to me was ridiculous because this is a internal democratic union decision of members, not something to bring the courts.

Advertisement

And of course, the reactionaries in Congress caught onto this and brought the president forward to a deposition and there was a hearing about this, and this is just ridiculous. This is the kind of stuff that is reminiscent of the McCarthyist period in this country. So I think workers and folks should know that. I think, number one, the strongest protection you’re going to have is a union in all of this because there will be retaliation. We take risks and speak out politically, but there’s no stronger defense than a union that’s going to have your back in these situations. But second, we need to take those risks. We need to step up and stand up and speak out on all of these issues, because if we don’t do it, no one’s going to do it, right?

And I think the solidarity movement for Palestine in this country I think has really, I think, constantly spoken about how labor entering the fight has really changed the dynamic, right? Because it’s not just a protest of groups that have usually come out for these things, now it’s got another added muscle to it, which is the labor movement. So don’t get discouraged, is my kind of message at the end of this.

George Waksmunski:

First we got to have discussions. We have to be talking to each other worker to worker have to have … Workers on the shop floor, they’re having these discussions and they have like-minded people. Those like-minded people should bring themselves together, come to their union meeting, exercise their rights within the union too to speak at those meetings and make your voices be heard that we need to express ourselves on this issue, because again, an injury to one is an injury to all. These are workers who are being murdered and injured and starved in Palestine, in Gaza, in the West Bank. And so it is a workers’ issue and we should take these conversations to our locals, seek for them to pass resolutions in support of a ceasefire and in support of end of all military aid to Israel.

Advertisement

Workers can be seeking out community groups. There’s rallies in every city, in every town at some point, maybe not every town, but almost anywhere you go, you could find a rally in support of the people of Palestine and go to a rally, find somebody. Find a group who sponsored that rally. Get involved with that group and they can share information with you that you could take back to your local union and have more discussions and more conversations about this very important issue. And we got to educate people. We got to mobilize people. That takes time. We got to get people out of their comfort zone because, “Why is this important to me? That’s way over there. I have nothing to do with that. Why should I care?”

Well, we got to educate people on that and we got to get them out of this decades’ old way of thinking that, “What is happening over there don’t affect me,” because it does affect us. We’re paying the taxes. We’re building the bombs, we’re sending the bombs, we’re sending the bombs and the bombs are dropping on innocent children and women and men, citizens indiscriminately. And that has to end because what happens there can happen here and we’re in a living in a crazy time. Our country’s under a severe attack and this political season is very scary. We’ve seen an attempted assassination right here in Western Pennsylvania and we’ve seen multiple other acts of violence against political leaders all across the country.

So we really have to be talking to each other, taking it to our union meetings, having these discussions, educating people, getting involved. There’s all kind of ways. You can go to the National Labor Network for Ceasefire. You could come, look up the UE’s website at ueunion.org, reach out to us. We will try to find you somebody to get in touch with. Many of our locals are active. Like I said, I’m going today here in Pittsburgh area. We have three or four locals who are very active in the struggle. A lot of them aren’t active, but here we definitely have a few who are out there all the time, but thank you.

Maximillian Alvarez:

Advertisement

All right, gang, that’s going to wrap it up for us here at Working People. I want to thank our incredible guest, Brandon Mancilla, UAW Region 9A director, and George Waksmunski, Eastern Region president of the United Electrical Radio and Machine Workers, for coming on the show today and talking to us about this important issue. And I want to thank the great Mel Buer for co-hosting with me. Mel and I want to do more of these conversations. We want to keep talking to more folks, union and non-union and getting more perspectives on these and other issues as we continue into the election season and beyond. So please do reach out to us if you have recommendations for folks you’d like us to talk to or topics that you want us to discuss.

And as always, I want to thank you all for listening and I want to thank you for caring. We’ll see you all back here next week for another episode of Working People. And if you can’t wait that long, then go subscribe to our Patreon and check out the great bonus episodes that we’ve got there for our patrons. And of course, go explore all the other great work that we’re doing at The Real News Network where we do grassroots journalism that lifts up the voices and stories from the frontlines of struggle. Sign up for The Real News newsletter so you never miss a story and help us do more work like this by going to therealnews.com/donate and becoming a supporter today. It really makes a difference. I’m Maximillian Alvarez.

Mel Buer:

And I’m Mel Buer.

Advertisement

Maximillian Alvarez:

Take care of yourselves. Take care of each other. Solidarity forever.

Advertisement

Creative Commons License

Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

‘Doomsday’ Glacier Is Set to Melt Faster

Published

on

‘Doomsday’ Glacier Is Set to Melt Faster

Tidal action on the underside of the Thwaites Glacier in the Antarctic will “inexorably” accelerate melting this century, according to new research by British and American scientists. The researchers warn the faster melting could destabilize the entire West Antarctic ice sheet, leading to its eventual collapse.

The massive glacier—which is roughly the size of Florida—is of particular interest to scientists because of the rapid speed at which it is changing and the impact its loss would have on sea levels (the reason for its “Doomsday” moniker). It also acts as an anchor holding back the West Antarctic ice sheet.

Warmed ocean water melts doomsday glacier faster
Yasin Demirci—Anadolu/Getty Images

More than 2 kilometers (1.2 miles) thick in places, Thwaites has been likened to a cork in a bottle. Were it to collapse, sea levels would rise by 65 centimeters (26 inches). That’s already a significant amount, given oceans are currently rising 4.6 millimeters a year. But if it led to the eventual loss of the entire ice sheet, sea levels would rise 3.3 meters.

While some computer models suggest reductions in greenhouse gas emissions under the 2015 Paris Agreement may mitigate the glacier’s retreat, the outlook for the glacier remains “grim,” according to a report by the International Thwaites Glacier Collaboration (ITGC), a project that includes researchers from the British Antarctic Survey, the U.S. National Science Foundation and the U.K.’s Natural Environment Research Council.

Thwaites has been retreating for more than 80 years but that process has accelerated in the past 30, Rob Larter, a marine geophysicist who contributed to the research, said in a news release. “Our findings indicate it is set to retreat further and faster.” Other dynamics that aren’t currently incorporated into large-scale models could speed up its demise, the new research shows. 

Advertisement

Using a torpedo-shaped robot, scientists determined that the underside of Thwaites is insulated by a thin layer of cold water. However, in areas where the parts of the glacier lift off the seabed and the ice begins to float, tidal action is pumping warmer sea water, at high pressure, as far as 10 kilometers under the ice. The process is disrupting that insulating layer and will likely significantly speed up how fast the grounding zone—the area where the glacier sits on the seabed—retreats.

A similar process has been observed on glaciers in Greenland.

The group also flagged a worst-case scenario in which 100-meter-or-higher ice cliffs at the front of Thwaites are formed and then rapidly calve off icebergs, causing runaway glacial retreat that could raise sea levels by tens of centimeters in this century. However, the researchers said it’s too early to know if such scenarios are likely.

A key unanswered question is whether the loss of Thwaites Glacier is already irreversible. Heavy snowfalls, for example, regularly occur in the Antarctic and help replenish ice loss, Michelle Maclennan, a climate scientist with the University of Colorado at Boulder, explained during a news briefing. “The problem though is that we have this imbalance: There is more ice loss occurring than snowfall can compensate for,” she said. 

Advertisement

Increased moisture in the planet’s atmosphere, caused by global warming evaporating ocean waters, could result in more Antarctic snow—at least for a while. At a certain point, though, that’s expected to switch over to rain and surface melting on the ice, creating a situation where the glacier is melting from above and below. How fast that happens depends in part on nations’ progress to slow climate change.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

David Lammy seeks emergency boost to aid cash to offset rising cost of migrant hotels

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Britain’s foreign secretary David Lammy is pushing for an emergency top-up to development spending as ballooning costs of supporting asylum seekers threaten to drain overseas aid to its lowest level since 2007.

The UK government spent £4.3bn hosting asylum seekers and refugees in Britain in the last financial year, more than a quarter of its £15.4bn overseas aid budget, according to official data. This more than consumed the £2.5bn increases in the aid budget scheduled between 2022 and 2024 by former Conservative chancellor Jeremy Hunt.

Advertisement

People familiar with Lammy’s thinking say he fears that if Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, resists calls to at least match Hunt’s offer, the aid budget will be further eviscerated, undermining the government’s ambitions on the global stage.

Currently, the housing of asylum seekers in hotels is controlled by the Home Office but largely paid for out of the aid budget, a set-up introduced in 2010 when spending on the programme was relatively modest.

In the longer term, development agencies and some Foreign Office officials want the costs capped or paid for by the Home Office itself.

However, such a move would be politically fraught, the people said, as it would require billions of pounds of extra funding for the Home Office at a time the government is preparing widespread cuts across departments.

Advertisement

Sir Keir Starmer, the prime minister, is due to attend a string of upcoming international events, starting with the UN general assembly this month, then a Commonwealth summit in Samoa, a G20 meeting in Brazil, and COP-29 climate talks in Azerbaijan later this autumn.

International partners will be looking at these meetings for signs that the change of government in the UK marks a change in direction on development.

Britain’s leading role was eroded by Rishi Sunak after he cut the previously ringfenced spending from 0.7 per cent of gross national income to 0.5 per cent when he was chancellor in 2020.

“When he turns up at the UN next week and the G20 and COP a few weeks later, the PM has a unique opportunity to reintroduce the UK under Labour as a trustworthy partner that sees the opportunity of rebooting and reinvesting in a reformed fairer international financial system,” said Jamie Drummond, co-founder of aid advocacy group One.

Advertisement

“But to be that trusted partner you need to be an intentional investor — not an accidental cutter.”

Speaking on Tuesday in a speech outlining UK ambitions to regain a leading role in the global response to climate change, Lammy said the government wanted to get back to spending 0.7 per cent of GNI on overseas aid but that it could not be done overnight.   

“Part of the reason the funding has not been there is because climate has driven a migration crisis,” he said. “We have ended up in this place where we made a choice to spend development aid on housing people across the country and having a huge accommodation and hotel bill as a consequence,” he said.

Under OECD rules, some money spent in-country on support for refugees and asylum seekers can be classified as aid because it constitutes a form of humanitarian assistance.

Advertisement

But the amount the UK has been spending on refugees from its aid budget has shot up from an average of £20mn a year between 2009-2013 to £4.3bn last year, far more than any other OECD donor country, according to Bond, the network of NGOs working in international development.

Spending per refugee from the aid budget has also risen from an average of £1,000 a year in 2009-2013 to around £21,500 in 2021, largely as a result of the use of hotels to accommodate asylum seekers.

The Independent Commission for Aid Impact watchdog argues that the Home Office has had little incentive to manage the funds carefully because they come from a different department’s budget.

In her July 29 speech outlining the dire fiscal straits that Labour inherited from the previous Conservative government, Reeves projected the cost of the asylum system would rise to £6.4bn this year.

Advertisement

Labour was hoping to cut this by at least £800mn, she said, by ending plans to deport migrants to Rwanda. A Home Office official said the government was also ensuring that asylum claims were dealt with faster and those ineligible deported quickly.

But the Foreign Office projects that on current trends, overseas aid as a proportion of UK income (when asylum costs are factored in) will drop to 0.35 per cent of national income by 2028.

Without emergency funding to plug the immediate cost of housing tens of thousands of migrants in hotels, that will happen as soon as this year, according to Bond, bringing overseas aid levels to their lowest as a proportion of national income, since 2007.

The Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office said: “The UK’s future [official development assistance] budget will be announced at the Budget. We would not comment on speculation.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

News

AI translation now ‘good enough’ for Economist to deploy

Published

on

AI translation now 'good enough' for Economist to deploy

The Economist has deployed AI-translated content on its budget-friendly “snack-sized” app Espresso after deciding the technology had reached the “good enough” mark.

Ludwig Siegele, senior editor for AI initiatives at The Economist, told Press Gazette that AI translation will never be a “solved problem”, especially in journalism because it is difficult to translate well due to its cultural specificities.

However he said it has reached the point where it is good enough to have introduced AI-powered, in-app translations in French, German, Mandarin and Spanish on The Economist’s “bite-sized”, cut-price app Espresso (which has just over 20,000 subscribers).

Espresso has also just been made free to high school and university students aged 16 and older globally as part of a project by The Economist to make its journalism more accessible to audiences around the world.

Siegele said that amid “lots of hype” about AI, the questions to ask are: “What is it good for? Does it work? And does it work with what we’re trying to do?”

Advertisement


He added that the project to make The Economist’s content “more accessible to more people” via Espresso was a “good point to start”.

Content from our partners
Advertisement

“The big challenge of AI is the technology, at least for us, is not good enough,” he continued. “It’s interesting, but to really develop a product, I think in many cases, it’s not good enough yet. But in that case, it worked.

“I wouldn’t say that translation is a solved problem, it is never going to be a solved problem, especially in journalism, because journalism is really difficult to translate. But it’s good enough for that type of content.”

The Economist is using AI translation tool DeepL alongside its own tech on the backend.

“It’s quite complicated,” Siegele said. “The translation is the least of it at this point. The translation isn’t perfect. If you look at it closely it has its quirks, but it’s pretty good. And we’re working on a kind of second workflow which makes it even better.”

Advertisement

The AI-translated text is not edited by humans because, Siegele said, the “workflow is so tight” on Espresso which updates around 20 times a day.

“There is no natural thing where we can say ‘okay, now everything is done. Let’s translate, and let’s look at the translations and make sure they’re perfect’. That doesn’t work… The only thing we can do is, if it’s really embarrassing, we’ll take it down and the next version in 20 minutes will be better.”

One embarrassing example, Siegele admitted, is that the tool turned German Chancellor Olaf Scholz into a woman.

But Siegele said a French reader has already got in touch to say: “I don’t read English. This is great. Finally, I can read The Economist without having to put it into Google Translate and get bad translations.”

Advertisement

The Economist’s AI-translated social videos

The Economist simultaneously launched AI-translated videos on its social platforms in the same four languages.

The videos are all a maximum of 90 seconds meaning it is not too much work to check them – crucial as, unlike the Espresso article translations, they are edited by humans (native language speakers working for The Economist) taking about 15 minutes per video.

For the videos The Economist is using AI video tool Hey Gen. Siegele said: “The way that works is you give them the original video and they do a provisional translation and then you can proofread the translation. So whereas the translations for the app are basically automatic – I mean, we can take them down and we will be able to change them, but at this point, they’re completely automatic – videos are proofread, and so in this way we can make sure that the translations are really good.”

In addition they are using “voice clones” which means journalists who speak in a video have some snippets of themselves given to Hey Gen to build and that is used to create the finished product.

Advertisement

The voice clones are not essential, Siegele explained, as translations can be done automatically regardless. Journalists can opt out of having their voices used in this way, and any data stored will be deleted if the employee leaves The Economist. But the clones do mean the quality is “much better”.

They have a labelling system for the app articles and videos that can show they are “AI translated” or “AI transformed”. But, Siegele said, they are “not going to have a long list of AI things we may have used to build this article for brainstorming or fact checking or whatever, because in the end it’s like a tool, it’s like Google search. We are still responsible, and there’s almost always a human except for edge cases like the Espresso translations or with podcast transcripts…”

Economist ‘will be strategic’ when choosing how to roll out AI

Asked whether the text translation could be rolled out to more Economist products, Siegele said: “That’s of course a goal but it remains to be seen.”

He said that although translation for Espresso is automated, it would not be the goal to do the same throughout The Economist.

Advertisement

He also said they still have to find out if people are “actually interested” and if they can “develop a translation engine that is good enough”.

“But I don’t think we will become a multi-linguistic, multi-language publication anytime soon. We will be much more strategic with what we what we translate… But I think there is globally a lot of demand for good journalism, and if the technology makes it possible, why not expand the access to our content?

“If it’s not too expensive – and it was too expensive before. It’s no longer.”

Other ways The Economist is experimenting with AI, although they have not yet been implemented, include a style bot and fact-checking.

Advertisement

Expect to see “some kind of summarisation” of articles, Siegele continued, “which probably will go beyond the five bullet points or three bullet points you increasingly see, because that’s kind of table stakes. People expect that. But there are other ways of doing it”.

He also suggested some kind of chatbot but “not an Economist GPT – that’s difficult and people are not that interested in that. Perhaps more narrow chatbots”. And said versioning, or repurposing articles for different audiences or different languages, could also follow.

“The usual stuff,” Siegele said. “There’s only so many good ideas out there. We’re working on all of them.” But he said he wants colleagues to come up with solutions to their problems rather than him as “the AI guy” imposing things.

Advertisement

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our “Letters Page” blog

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Kentucky sheriff held over fatal shooting of judge in court

Published

on

Kentucky sheriff held over fatal shooting of judge in court

A Kentucky sheriff has been arrested after fatally shooting a judge in his chambers, police say.

District Judge Kevin Mullins died at the scene after being shot multiple times in the Letcher County Courthouse, Kentucky State Police said.

Letcher County Sheriff Shawn Stines, 43, has been charged with one count of first-degree murder.

The shooting happened on Thursday after an argument inside the court, police said, but they have not yet revealed a motive.

Advertisement

Officials said Mullins, 54, was shot multiple times at around 14:00 local time on Thursday at the court in Whitesburg, Kentucky, a small rural town about 150 miles (240km) south-east of Lexington.

Sheriff Stines was arrested at the scene without incident, Kentucky State Police said. They did not reveal the nature of the argument before the shooting.

According to local newspaper the Mountain Eagle, Sheriff Stines walked into the judge’s outer office and told court employees that he needed to speak alone with Mullins.

The two entered the judge’s chambers, closing the door behind them. Those outside heard gun shots, the newspaper reported.

Advertisement

Sheriff Stines reportedly walked out with his hands up and surrendered to police. He was handcuffed in the courthouse foyer.

The state attorney general, Russell Coleman, said in a post on X, formerly Twitter, that his office “will fully investigate and pursue justice”.

Kentucky State Police spokesman Matt Gayheart told a news conference that the town was shocked by the incident

“This community is small in nature, and we’re all shook,” he said.

Advertisement

Mr Gayheart said that 50 employees were inside the court building when the shooting occurred.

No-one else was hurt. A school in the area was briefly placed on lockdown.

Kentucky Supreme Court Chief Justice Laurance B VanMeter said he was “shocked by this act of violence”.

Announcing Judge Mullins’ death on social media, Kentucky Governor Andy Beshear said: “There is far too much violence in this world, and I pray there is a path to a better tomorrow.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Chinese EV makers boost Hong Kong stock index

Published

on

Electric-vehicle makers boosted Hong Kong stocks on Friday, as major indices rose across the board in the wake of the US Federal Reserve’s interest rate cut.

The Hang Seng index rose 1.8 per cent, with Chinese EV companies Xpeng and Geely Auto adding 9 per cent and 4.8 per cent, respectively.

Japan’s Topix rose 1.5 per cent, while South Korea’s Kospi added 1 per cent.

Australia’s S&P/ASX 200 rose 0.4 per cent, led by clinical trial groups Euren Pharmaceuticals and Telix Pharmaceuticals, which gained as much as 6.7 per cent and 4.9 per cent, respectively.

Advertisement

On Thursday, the S&P 500 gained 1.7 per cent, hitting a new record after the Fed’s half-point rate cut announcement on Wednesday.

Source link

Continue Reading

News

Starmer ‘in control’ and ‘Al Fayed rape scandal’

Published

on

Starmer 'in control' and 'Al Fayed rape scandal'
"I'm still in control, says Starmer as feud erupts" reads the Daily Telegraph headline

A picture of Scarlett Johansson features on the front of Daily Telegraph as she attends the London premiere of film Transformers One which she stars in. The paper leads on Sir Keir Starmer denying he has lost control of Downing Street “despite civil war breaking out at the centre of his government”. It adds tensions in No 10 and questions over chief of staff Sue Gray’s £170,000 salary threaten to overshadow the Labour Party conference.
The i headline reads "Middle East steps closer to regional war"

A funeral in Lebanon is the main picture on the front of the i newspaper. It reports the Middle East is “steps closer to regional war” as Israel bombs southern Lebanon. Armed group Hezbollah was targeted with pager and walkie-talkie attacks. Elsewhere, it says there is a frantic hunt for the mole who leaked Sue Gray’s salary to the BBC.
The Guardian headline reads "Hezbollah chief vows 'retribution' against Israel after wave of attacks"

The Guardian leads with Hezbollah’s leader Hassan Nasrallah threatening Israel with “tough retribution and just punishment” in a speech on Thursday. He also threatened to strike Israel “where it expects and where it does not”. Hot To Go! singer Chappel Roan also features on the page, telling the paper: “My whole life has changed”.
Reeves told to reverse cuts after £10bn boost, reads the lead story in the Times

Chancellor Rachel Reeves has been provided with a £10bn budget boost by the Bank of England which is increasing pressure on her to ease spending cuts and tax rises, the Times writes. The paper says Labour MPs are calling for the cash to be used to delay scrapping some pensioners’ winter fuel payments.
"Al Fayed 'a serial rapist'" headlines the Metro

“Al Fayed ‘a serial rapist’” headlines the Metro as it reports on the BBC investigation into late billionaire and Harrods owner Mohamed Al Fayed. The papers reports the BBC’s investigation found more than 20 female ex-employees say Mr Al Fayed sexually assaulted or raped them. The Metro writes the tycoon who was “portrayed as the gregarious father” of Diana’s lover Dodi in Netflix’s The Crown “was a monster”.
The Daily Mirror headline reads "shop of horrors"

“Shop of horrors” headlines the Mirror as it picks up the BBC’s story on Mr Al Fayed. The Mirror says at least 100 women are feared to have been sexually abused by the tycoon. It quotes Gemma, his former personal assistant. Speaking to the BBC about Mr Al Fayed, who she accuses of raping her, she said: “He felt like such a powerful man with so much money.”
"I survived atomic bomb tests and cancer but will I survive this winter?"

The Daily Express pictures RAF veteran Jack Barlow who says he survived atomic bomb tests but now asks if he will survive the winter due to his winter fuel payment being “snatched away”.
Financial Times headlines "consumer confidence takes tumble as households fear 'painful Budget'"

The Financial Times says consumer confidence in the UK fell sharply in September, wiping out progress made so far this year. The paper observes it comes despite consumers benefiting from cheaper loans, rising real wages and a decrease in inflation. Elsewhere, it pictures people in Lebanon watching the leader of Hezbollah give a speech in which he vowed revenge on Israel.
Daily Mail headlines "English identity is under threat warns Jenrick"

Tory leadership contender Robert Jenrick has written in the Daily Mail that mass immigration and woke culture have put England’s national identity at risk. He says the ties which bind the nation together are beginning to “fray”. Elsewhere, it reports Mr Starmer is “on the rack” over Ms Gray’s salary and freebies.
The Sun headlines reads: "Ronnie and Laila's 147 break"

The Sun reports Snooker player Ronnie O’Sullivan has split from fiancee actress Laila Rouass.
"What planet are they on" says the Daily Star

The Daily Star asks “what planet are they on?” It says minister defends “cadger PM’s £100k of freebies” as some pensioners lose the winter fuel payment.
News Daily banner
News Daily banner

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2017 Zox News Theme. Theme by MVP Themes, powered by WordPress.