On Wednesday Keir Starmer was once again confronted with difficult questions about his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as US ambassador, despite his ties to the notorious paedophile
18:57, 11 Mar 2026Updated 19:07, 11 Mar 2026
Even war in the Middle East can’t silence the drumbeat of anger around Jeffrey Epstein and his web of influence.
On Wednesday Keir Starmer was once again confronted with difficult questions about his decision to appoint Peter Mandelson as US ambassador, despite his ties to the notorious paedophile.
This fateful mistake has cast a cloud over the Prime Minister, whose leadership was left teetering on the very brink last month. The first batch of Mandelson files contains no dramatic revelations – bar the extraordinary demands by Lord Mandelson for a £500,000 payout from the taxpayer.
Advertisement
Ensure our latest headlines always appear at the top of your Google Search by making us a Preferred Source. Click here to activateor add us as your Preferred Source in your Google search settings.
But it offers no exoneration for Mr Starmer either. The 147-page dossier lays out in black and white how the Prime Minister was warned about Lord Mandelson’s friendship with Epstein. A due diligence report by the Cabinet Office explicitly mentions claims that Lord Mandelson remained friends with Epstein after his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor. It also notes reports that Lord Mandelson stayed at Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse while he was in jail.
Advertisement
There is private frustration in Downing Street that Scotland Yard has blocked the release of a crucial exchange between Morgan McSweeney, the PM’s then-chief of staff, and Lord Mandelson. No10 insiders believe the questions posed by Mr McSweeney will demonstrate that Lord Mandelson lied outright. The peer is said to believe he answered accurately.
All involved believe the police probe must be allowed to proceed, but there is some frustration that this exchange has been held back. Yesterday’s document dump is only the tip of the iceberg of the vast tranche of documents, WhatsApps and emails relating to the appointment the Government has been compelled to publish by Parliament.
What comes next could be more explosive, including Lord Mandelson’s communications with top ministers and officials. Diplomats are concerned about the risk of stray comments offending Donald Trump or other world leaders, even after the files have passed through vetting by Parliament’s intelligence watchdog.
But the central questions remain – what did Mr Starmer know and when? It may be true that he didn’t know the full extent of their friendship, and Lord Mandelson may have lied to him.
Advertisement
But even if Mr Starmer never read newspaper reports about Mandelson and Epstein, officials spelled out to him that there were serious risks and he appointed him anyway. Perhaps he weighed these risks against the benefits of Mandelson’s undoubted political skills, which were deployed successfully with Mr Trump.
Perhaps he was badly advised by Mr McSweeney, who quit last month over the row. Time will tell whether these files clear the PM or not. But the buck will stop with him in the end.
The Girvan company has implemented a structured programme to align people, processes and strategy, building stronger, more resilient operations.
Land Energy, based in South Ayrshire, has been named the winner of the Resilience Award at the 2026 Industry Awards hosted by the Centre for Engineering, Education and Development (CeeD).
Advertisement
The award recognises organisations that demonstrate exceptional ability to strengthen operations, adapt to change and build long-term resilience through effective leadership, strategy and continuous improvement.
The Girvan company implemented a structured programme to align people, processes and strategy, building stronger, more resilient operations.
Early improvements from targeted initiatives and gap analysis are already delivering measurable benefits.
And these results form the foundation for ongoing organisational growth, strengthening internal systems and ensuring the organisation is well positioned to adapt and grow in a rapidly changing energy landscape.
Advertisement
In addition, it illustrates how the company is becoming more adaptable, especially in the current geopolitically uncertain era.
Reg Stewart, Business Excellence Lead at Land Energy, said: “We are incredibly proud to receive this award from CeeD.
“Building resilience is about ensuring the organisation is strong, flexible, and ready for the future.
“Our entire team has been working hard to review our processes, identify opportunities for improvement, and align our people and systems around a clear long-term vision.
Advertisement
“This award reflects commitment across the whole business to continuous improvement and operational excellence.”
Reg added: “We would also like to thank all the other nominees and CeeD for an amazing evening.”
The CeeD Industry Awards celebrate organisations across Scotland that demonstrate excellence in innovation, knowledge exchange, skills development, internationalisation, collaboration and leadership.
Advertisement
Land Energy’s success highlights the strength of Scotland’s renewable energy and manufacturing sectors and the importance of resilient organisations in supporting sustainable economic growth in Scotland and the wider UK.
Founded in 2006, Land Energy is now the UK’s largest producer of sustainable wood pellets and briquettes, supplying low-carbon renewable fuel to homes and businesses nationwide.
The company also manufactures a range of sustainable products, including pizza pellets, cat litter, horse bedding and a new soil conditioner, Solivita.
Filip Jorgensen’s costly error at the Parc des Princes was the pivotal moment as Chelsea suffered a late collapse to lose 5-2 to Paris St Germain in the first leg of their Champions League last-16 tie.
The visitors had twice recovered from a goal down and looked like surviving an intriguing match with a draw when, in the 74th minute, Jorgensen’s pass was cut out easily by Bradley Barcola, substitute Khvicha Kvaratskhelia squared it and Vitinha chipped the stranded goalkeeper.
Malo Gusto and Enzo Fernandez had earlier scored equalisers in answer to goals by Barcola and Ousmane Dembele.
Then came Jorgensen’s awful misjudgement, a blow Chelsea clearly struggled psychologically to recover from. Kvaratskhelia curled in a brilliant fourth soon after then tapped in a fifth in stoppage time as the holders twisted the knife.
Advertisement
Chelsea were brave in coming to the home of the European champions and taking them on but their nativity was their undoing.
They were too casual about the threat posed by PSG, leaving space for Dembele and for Barcola, not giving their all in challenging for second balls and too easily pulled out of shape by rapid transitions.
These are the missing details that will almost certainly mean an exit next week for Liam Rosenior’s side, but they also exposed PSG’s own defensive vulnerabilities – Barcola in particular was horribly at fault for Gusto’s goal – and there remains a sniff of encouragement that the holders can be beaten.
There was no suggestion Chelsea had come to Paris to keep it tight and stay in the tie. They came at the European champions with a high line and plenty pushed forward as they sought to play the game in the hosts’ half.
Advertisement
They could have scored in the first few minutes, Reece James crossing low from the right but Joao Pedro failed to make good contact.
This though is a team prone to defensive lapses. They had already got away once with failing to deal with a ball as it bounced inside their box when PSG punished them.
Dembele was given space on the right to cross, Joao Neves was left with room to nod it down for Barcola who controlled with his chest then thundered it in off the bar.
Chelsea have been accused of wilting in adversity but here they dug in and hit back. Fernandez’s clever switch of the play found Gusto with virtually the freedom of the PSG box after Barcola switched off.
Advertisement
The defender took a touch and drilled it and though Matvei Safonov got a hand on it the ball bounced past him and in.
A wild 14-second spell ended with PSG retaking the lead.
Cole Palmer should have scored with a free effort hit straight at Safonov. The ball was cleared and in a flash Dembele was streaking over the halfway line. Wesley Fofana recovered and got goal side but the Ballon d’Or winner turned him with some ease before sending a low finish into the corner.
Pedro Neto had shown in the first half that he had the beating of Marquinhos for pace and he showed the PSG captain his heels again to set up the equaliser, racing into the box and pulling back for Fernandez who rifled into the top corner.
Advertisement
Then came Jorgensen’s dreadful misjudgement to let in Vitinha to score before Kvaratskhelia’s brace all but finished the tie.
Antonin Kinsky has thanked those who have sent him messages of support on social media after a “nightmare” display in Tottenham Hotspur’s Champions League defeat at Atletico Madrid on Tuesday.
The Czech goalkeeper was substituted after 17 minutes with Spurs trailing 3-0 in the Spanish capital, having made errors which led to Atletico’s first and third goals.
Kinsky posted on his Instagram story: “Thanks for the messages. From dream to nightmare to dream again. See you.”
Advertisement
The 22-year-old was consoled by several team-mates as he made his way off the field.
Spurs manager Igor Tudor, who had selected him to start ahead of Guglielmo Vicario, did not acknowledge Kinsky at the time but said in his post-match media conference that he had spoken with his goalkeeper afterwards.
The former Croatia international said of the substitution: “It was necessary to preserve the guy and preserve the team.
“It was, before the game, the right choice to do in the moment we are [in] – pressure on Vicario, another competition and Toni is a very good goalkeeper.
Advertisement
“So it was, for me, the right decision. After, it’s easy to say it was not the right decision.
“I explained to Toni, speaking after, that he is the right guy and a good goalkeeper. Unfortunately, these mistakes happened in this big game.”
A look at Manchester City’s fixtures after Pep Guardiola’s side were humbled by Real Madrid at the Bernabeu as Federico Valverde scored a first-half hat-trick to hand the La Liga giants victory
Manchester City’s attention will turn to other priorities this weekend after a disappointing defeat to Real Madrid in the Champions League. A Federico Valverde-inspired performance put Los Blancos in the driving seat for a place in the quarter-finals after a 3-0 win.
Pep Guardiola’s side cannot dwell on the scoreline as the prospect of a Premier League title race returns this weekend. City are seven points behind Arsenal in the division, but with a game in hand.
They will fall another game behind the Gunners on Saturday, as Mikel Arteta’s men face Everton a matter of hours before City take on West Ham at the London Stadium. The pressure could well and truly be on by the time 8pm arrives.
Only two games remain before the two teams face off in the Carabao Cup final, looking to win the first piece of silverware of the season, before FA Cup duties then arise after the international break.
Advertisement
It remains to be seen whether Arsenal and City have additional Champions League duties after that, or space to breathe. Guardiola’s side must pull off a remarkable comeback at the Etihad in seven days’ time, while their north London rivals must beat Bayer Leverkusen at the Emirates.
All eyes will be on the title-topping meeting between the clubs on April 19, however. That will be a significant match, as they all are from here on out.
The government has responded to calls to create an independent panel
Tom Burnett Content Editor
21:48, 11 Mar 2026Updated 21:49, 11 Mar 2026
The government has rejected calls – including from hundreds of people in Greater Manchester – for a new way for parents to appeal over school absences.
At present, headteachers decide whether a child’s absence is unauthorised, with parents having little chance to appeal.
Advertisement
The petition, which has been signed by 14,968 people across the UK, calls for an independent panel to be set up to help ‘prevent bias’ in recording absences from school.
Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. And don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.
It states: “As it stands, the decision whether a school absence is authorised or not lies solely with the headteacher or designated attendance officer. If this person deems the absence as not “exceptional” enough, or marks an illness absence as unauthorised, there is no formal right of appeal for parents.
“I’m proposing that the Government sets up an independent national appeals panel to allow parents to appeal a heads decision. This will prevent bias, ensure transparency, and put a stop to blanket policies within schools. Often, the nature of the absence means it should either be marked as authorised under code ‘I’, or authorised under code ‘C’ which is leave for exceptional circumstances. If a FPN is issued, parents are forced to risk court and a criminal conviction or accept liability by paying the FPN.”
Advertisement
How many people have signed the petition in my area?
In Greater Manchester almost 750 people have signed the petition as of 9.30pm on Wednesday, March 11. You can see how many people have signed the petition in your constituency below:
In a response to the petition published on Wednesday, March 11, the Government said it had no plans to introduce an independent panel.
It said: “The Government has no plans to introduce an independent national appeals panel for school absences and believes there are already sufficient routes for parents to challenge inaccurate absence coding.
“The Government has no plans to introduce an independent national appeals panel for school absences. When determining the most appropriate attendance or absence code, teachers and headteachers should use their professional judgement of each pupil’s individual circumstances, context and educational needs, alongside the ‘Working together to improve school attendance’ guidance and information provided by the parent or guardian. Existing processes including informal conversations, use of the school’s complaints procedure, local authority complaints procedures, Ofsted inspections and escalation routes to DfE and to the Local Government Ombudsman provide appropriate channels for oversight and raising concerns, negating the need for a separate appeals structure.
“Parents have a legal duty under the Education Act 1996 to ensure that their child of compulsory school age (5-16) receives a full‑time education, either by attending school or otherwise. Where a child is registered at a school, parents must ensure they attend regularly. Parents can be penalised if their child is absent from school without authorisation.
Advertisement
“We recognise there are situations in which a pupil is unable to attend school for a legally recognised reason. The Education Act 1996 sets out these situations in which an absent pupil will not be taken to have failed to attend school regularly. These include illness or other unavoidable circumstances, religious observance, where the school has given prior permission for absence, or where the local authority has not fulfilled any duty it has to help the child attend.
“Schools must record attendance in line with the School Attendance (Pupil Registration) (England) Regulations 2024 and with regard to the DfE’s statutory guidance ‘Working together to improve school attendance’. Decisions about how an absence should be recorded depend on the individual facts of each case. Headteachers and school staff know their pupils well and are therefore best placed to decide how an absence should be recorded. In the vast majority of cases, a parent’s notification that their child is ill should be sufficient for the school to authorise the absence using code I (illness). Schools also have discretion to grant a leave of absence in exceptional circumstances and parents should speak to their headteacher and present their case where they feel that such an absence is required.
“The Department has however made clear in statutory guidance that, generally, a need or desire for a holiday or other absence for the purpose of leisure and recreation would not constitute an exceptional circumstance. The majority of penalty notices (93% in the 2024-25 academic year) are issued for term-time holidays.
“Introducing an independent appeals panel would be inappropriate, given the ‘Working Together To Improve School Attendance’ guidance states that parents, schools and local authorities hold responsibility for pupils’ attendance. It would also create a bureaucratic process for thousands of routine attendance decisions made every day. This would generate significant administrative burden for schools, local authorities and any central appeals body, which would need funding, diverting time and resources away from teaching and supporting pupils.
Advertisement
“The Government believes that existing routes already provide clear and fair ways for parents to raise concerns. Where a parent believes an absence has been wrongly recorded, they should discuss this with the school in the first instance. If they remain dissatisfied, they can make a formal complaint through the school’s complaints procedure. If they believe the school has acted unlawfully, they can also escalate their complaint to the Department for Education or, where relevant, the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman.
“Local authorities also have established processes for reviewing evidence before issuing a penalty notice for unauthorised absence. Although there is no separate legal right of appeal, parents can challenge a penalty notice with the issuing local authority if they believe it was wrongly issued. Parents may provide evidence to support their case, and the authority must consider it carefully. If parents do not pay the notice and wish to contest it, the case may proceed to court, where they can present their arguments before magistrates. This provides an additional safeguard for parents who believe they have been treated unfairly.
“For these reasons, the Government does not believe that a new national appeals panel is necessary or appropriate. The current system already allows schools to apply professional judgement, gives parents clear ways to raise concerns or challenge decisions, and ensures that local authorities act carefully and proportionately in enforcing school attendance. This approach helps maintain consistency while keeping decision‑making close to the pupils and families who are directly affected.”
The Labour York and North Yorkshire mayor said walking with special goggles and with a cane along Walmgate was very overwhelming and made him feel vulnerable.
Scott Jobson, chief executive of MySight York who hosted the mayor, said he hoped the walk gave him a sense of the challenges people they help face.
Royal National Institute of Blind People’s (RNIB) North Yorkshire campaigns lead Lewis Winton said the powerful experience was an opportunity to show what living with sight loss is like.
It comes as Mr Skaith visited the charity, based in Walmgate, on Wednesday, March 11.
Advertisement
RECOMMENDED READING:
The mayor spoke to people who work with them and to blind and partially-sighted people including about getting around York, finding support and adapting to life with visual impairments.
MySight is a local charity with more than 1,700 members which helps people live independent lives and connects them to others through activities, socialising and counselling.
The visit saw Mr Skaith try on several goggles which simulate different kinds of sight conditions including cataracts and diabetic retinopathy.
Advertisement
York and North Yorkshire Mayor David Skaith (centre) with MySight Chief Executive Scott Jobson (second, right) and RNIB North Yorkshire campaigns lead Lewis Winton (end right), outside MySight, in Walmgate, York. Picture is from LDRS
Charity staff then took him on to Walmgate with goggles on giving the wearer the vision they would have if they had Retinitis Pigmentosa.
The condition refers to the total loss of peripheral vision, otherwise known as tunnel vision.
Mr Skaith walked with assistance from a MySight worker down Walmgate.
He was then given a cane and walked without physical help from staff.
Advertisement
The mayor told the Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) what the experience was like immediately after the walk.
He said: “It was very overwhelming, you realise how quickly you can become incredibly vulnerable and isolated.
“If you were doing this on your own in a new environment that you didn’t know it would be incredibly challenging, you can see why a lot of people struggle to manage.
“After this, I want to make sure what the combined authority’s currently doing on its strategy for transport and on efforts to get more people back into jobs works for everyone.”
Advertisement
York and North Yorkshire Mayor David Skaith (centre) on a guided walk with MySight in Walmgate, York. Picture is from LDRS
MySight Chief Executive Mr Jobson said he was grateful the mayor took the time to visit the charity.
He said: “Experiences like the guided walk help bring to life some of the everyday barriers faced by people living with sight loss.
“We hope the visit gave David a sense of both those challenges and the important role MySight York plays in helping blind and partially sighted people across York live independent, confident and connected lives.”
Now, there is a new man in the Madrid dugout, with Alvaro Arbeloa taking over from Xabi Alonso. He locks horns with Guardiola for the first time in his nascent managerial career, with the City boss eyeing a fourth European crown of his career after two with Barcelona and one with City.
WASHINGTON (AP) — House lawmakers were digging into Jeffrey Epstein’s sprawling financial portfolio on Wednesday as a committee deposed his former accountant and tried to understand his connections to some of the world’s wealthiest men.
Richard Kahn, who worked closely with Epstein for years and now serves as an executor of his estate, appeared for the closed-door deposition on Capitol Hill. He told lawmakers that he had not personally seen evidence of Epstein’s sexual abuse, but provided a fuller picture of how Epstein acquired his wealth. The wealthy financier made hundreds of millions of dollars over two decades, during which he struck up friendships with some of the world’s most powerful men.
Kahn “was under the impression that Epstein made his money as a tax advisor and a financial planner,” said Rep. James Comer, the Republican chair of the House Oversight Committee. Lawmakers argued that a fuller picture of Epstein’s finances could help the public understand how, for years, he was able to get away with trafficking and sexually abusing underage girls.
“Jeffrey Epstein’s sex trafficking ring would not have been possible without Richard Kahn, who managed Epstein’s money for years, authorized payments, including payments to victims and survivors,” said Rep. James Walkinshaw, D-Va., who added that Kahn told them he was unable to recall details of some of the transactions and communications that he was asked about.
Advertisement
Kahn has said that he was unaware of Epstein’s sexual abuse and had not seen any of his victims.
Comer, R-Ky., also said that lawmakers confirmed during the deposition that Epstein received significant amounts of money from former retail shopping chain executive Les Wexner, hedge fund manager Glenn Dubin, tech entrepreneur Steven Sinofsky, investor Leon Black and the Rothschilds, a wealthy banking family.
None of those people have been accused of wrongdoing in their relationships with Epstein, but Democrats on the committee argued that anyone with ties to the wealthy financier should be scrutinized. Wexner was deposed by the committee last month, and Comer has also called on Black, among several others, to appear for transcribed interviews.
Kahn also told lawmakers that Epstein had financial ties to Ehud Barak, who was the prime minister of Israel from 1999 to 2001, according to Democratic Rep. Suhas Subramanyam. Barak has not been accused of wrongdoing and has said he regrets his friendship with Epstein.
Advertisement
Comer also said Wednesday that the committee has reviewed over 40,000 documents that it subpoenaed from JPMorgan Chase and Deutsche Bank. Epstein was connected to at least 64 business entities, according to Comer.
Republican President Donald Trump has strongly denied any wrongdoing in his own ties to Epstein, and Comer said that Kahn had never seen any financial transactions between Epstein and Trump. Comer said that Kahn is the latest witness to testify that they had never seen Trump doing anything wrong with Epstein.
“The investigation’s about getting the truth to the American people, trying to figure out how the government failed, answer questions we all have,” Comer said.
The International Energy Agency (IEA), the developed nation body founded in the 1970s to deal with oil crises precisely like the one we’re now facing, has announced something extraordinary.
Its members, which is to say most of the world’s rich nations, will release an unprecedented amount of oil from their national stockpiles into the global market in the coming weeks.
This emergency stockpile release is more than double the last record, a whopping 400 million barrels of oil, to come from the stockpiles of its members around the world. Yet here’s the striking thing: far from falling, oil prices barely budged. After the announcement, Brent crude was still around 25% higher than before the attacks in the Gulf began.
Image: Tankers sit in Muscat, Oman, as Iran vowed to shut the Strait of Hormuz. Pic: Reuters
All of which raises the question: why? The short answer is that even after this new infusion of oil, the world is likely to remain short of oil. The long answer comes back to the fundamental nature of the oil market.
The best way to think of the oil market is as an enormous set of pipes through which crude oil and its products are constantly flowing. What matters, far more than how much oil there is in the ground, either in the form of reservoirs or stockpiles, is something more simple: how much oil is pumped through the global system every day.
And in recent years, the amount pumped through the system each day has worked out at about 100 million barrels of oil. Now, these numbers go up and down as the seasons turn and perhaps, in the coming years, might go down as people adopt electric cars and find alternatives to fossil fuels. But the key thing to keep in the back of your mind is that for the time being, much of the world’s living standards – our access to transportation, to power, to consumer goods, pharmaceuticals and the rest – depends on that 100 million barrels of oil pumped through the world’s pipes.
All of which brings us back to the Persian Gulf, which is responsible for about 30% of the world’s oil, of which around 15 million barrels pass through the Strait of Hormuz each day. The heart of the energy shock the world is getting its head round comes back to the fact that it is running short of 15 million barrels of oil a day. In other words, it’s all about that gap – between the oil we need to keep the world functioning and the oil we actually have.
Just not enough supply
That brings us back to the IEA’s emergency release. While the overall number is certainly high, what matters even more is a number the organisation didn’t release on Tuesday: how much of that oil it expects to come out each day. In other words, how much of the 15 million barrel gap will those emergency supplies fill?
The expectation among analysts is that the number will be 4-5 million barrels, which is not nothing but, as you’ll know if you have elementary mathematics, still leaves the world at least 10 million barrels short of oil each day.
Advertisement
There are other sources of oil. For one thing, Saudi Arabia, and to a lesser extent the United Arab Emirates, could pump more oil through their pipelines to ports that are not inside the Gulf (in other words, meaning tankers do not need to brave the straits). That might, optimistically, mean another 5.7 million barrels of oil.
On top of this, there are a handful of ships still passing through Hormuz. An educated guess suggests this might bring in another half a million or maybe, at the outside, a million barrels.
Tot it all up, though, taking the very best case scenario, and you’re still talking about a shortfall of 4 million barrels of oil for the global economy. This is far less scary than the 15 million shortfall we started off with, but it is nonetheless not enough to satisfy global oil consumption.
Why prices are still high
Advertisement
Which is at least part of the explanation for why oil prices are still so high and why, all around the world, countries are feeling the impacts. We tend to focus, here in Europe, on the stuff we are beginning to see – on higher petrol prices and the implications for bills. But it’s fanning out elsewhere too, especially in Asia. Indian oil refineries are shutting down; provinces are rationing liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) supplies for local households. Workers in Thailand and Vietnam are being urged to work from home to safeguard petrol supplies.
And the longer this goes on, the more of these impacts we will see. The world is facing an energy gap; it’s not clear how it bridges it.
Tanfield Railway was named ‘Railway of the Year’ at the Heritage Railway Association Annual Awards, held in Llandudno on March 7.
The awards recognise heritage railways across the UK, and Tanfield Railway stood out for its boost in passenger numbers and media coverage of its 300th anniversary celebrations last year.
The awards ceremony, which gathered over 300 representatives from heritage railways across the UK, saw Tanfield Railway receive the top accolade of the night.
David Watchman, general manager of Tanfield Railway, praised the work of volunteers in helping the railway achieve this award.
Advertisement
“This is the award everyone in the UK’s 180-plus heritage railways wants to win,” he said.
Volunteers celebrated after taking home the top gong. (Image: TANFIELD RAILWAY)
“So to be bringing the award back to the North East is amazing.
“I hope it can be a real catalyst to go on and achieve even more.”
The railway also celebrated Ben Wilson, its diesel locomotive foreman, as the joint winner of the Lord Faulkner Young Volunteer Award.
Advertisement
Mr Wilson, who started volunteering at 12, has become a key member of the team, using his technical skills to maintain and restore the locomotives, and is also noted for being one of the youngest locomotive drivers.
There was also a win for one of the railway’s volunteers. (Image: TANFIELD RAILWAY)
It is believed to be the first time in the history of the HRA awards that a single organisation has secured the Young Volunteer title two years in succession, with another Tanfield Railway volunteer, Elise Campbell, winning in the same category during 2025.
Heritage Railway Association chairman, Lord Parkinson of Whitley Bay, praised Tanfield Railway for overcoming challenges to preserve railway heritage and for nurturing young volunteers.
Advertisement
The Heritage Railway Association Awards saw a record-breaking number of entries this year. In addition to the main award, Tanfield Railway was also highly commended for its Tanfield300 events, narrowly beaten by the Keighley and Worth Valley Railway’s Railway Children Theatre Show.