Crypto World
Osmosis proposes OSMO-to-ATOM conversion to deepen Cosmos Hub ties
Osmosis has proposed converting OSMO to ATOM and tightening Cosmos Hub integration, testing whether chain mergers can boost liquidity, governance, and valuations.
Summary
- Osmosis plan offers OSMO–ATOM conversion at a fixed rate over six months, with unclaimed ATOM returning to the Hub community pool.
- Proposal would bind Osmosis liquidity, security, and governance more tightly to Cosmos Hub, positioning ATOM as the primary base asset.
- The move sharpens Cosmos’ consolidation vs app‑chain sovereignty debate, putting OSMO and ATOM holders in control via governance votes.
Interoperable DEX Osmosis has put forward a sweeping proposal to convert OSMO into ATOM and migrate its core protocol more tightly into the Cosmos Hub, in one of the most aggressive consolidation moves yet seen in the Cosmos ecosystem. The plan would effectively bind Osmosis’s liquidity, security, and governance more directly to the Hub, while offering OSMO holders a time‑limited path into ATOM exposure.
Under the proposal, all circulating OSMO – excluding undeployed community pool tokens – could be converted to ATOM over a six‑month window at a fixed rate of 1.998 OSMO for 0.0355 ATOM. Holders who do not claim within that period would see the corresponding ATOM returned to the Cosmos Hub community pool, concentrating unclaimed value under Hub governance. The structure is explicitly designed to avoid permanent dangling liabilities, while forcing a clear decision from tokenholders on whether they want to align with the Hub or exit.
Strategically, the proposal aims to turn Osmosis from a largely independent app‑chain into a native liquidity engine for Cosmos Hub, potentially simplifying the stack for users and institutional players who view Cosmos as fragmented. By consolidating liquidity and security at the Hub layer, proponents argue that Cosmos can present a cleaner narrative to external capital: one core base asset (ATOM), one primary liquidity venue (Osmosis on Hub), and unified governance. For Osmosis, the move could widen its addressable user base if ATOM’s brand and distribution outweigh the loss of a standalone token.
The trade‑offs are significant. OSMO holders face dilution of protocol‑specific upside in exchange for broader ATOM exposure and tighter alignment with the Hub’s long‑term roadmap. Cosmos Hub, on the other hand, would be implicitly underwriting Osmosis’s future, importing not only its liquidity and fees but also its technical and governance risk. Success would push Cosmos further toward a “hub and spokes” model with ATOM at the center; failure would strengthen the case for app‑chain sovereignty over consolidation.
If passed, the proposal would mark a clear escalation in the ongoing debate over how Cosmos should compete with more monolithic ecosystems like Ethereum and Solana. It would also provide a live test of whether token conversions and protocol mergers can unlock higher valuations and deeper liquidity, or whether they simply shuffle risk and governance complexity from one balance sheet to another. For now, all eyes will be on how both OSMO and ATOM holders respond at the ballot box.
Stablecoin yield providers will inject more capital into the US banking system, argues White House Council of Advisors for Digital Assets executive director Patrick Witt, amid debate over whether stablecoin yields will draw deposits away.
“Foreigners exchange local currency for stablecoins from a US-based issuer,” Witt said in an X post on Wednesday, adding that “global demand for USD is massive.”
“That is net new capital entering the American banking system,” Witt said. Most US stablecoin issuers hold US dollars or US Treasuries to back each token issued.
Banking and crypto industry clash over stablecoin yields
The US dollar index, which tracks the strength of the dollar against a basket of major currencies, fell to its lowest level in four years on Jan. 28, at 95.818, according to TradingView. It has since recovered 3.80% to 99.468.
It comes as the debate between crypto firms and US banks continues to heat up over the US CLARITY Act, aimed at providing the industry with clearer regulation, over whether allowing stablecoin yields will pull deposits out of traditional banks.
Major US bank Standard Chartered recently estimated in a research note that increasing stablecoin adoption could lead to US bank deposits decreasing “by one-third of stablecoin market cap.”
However, Witt argued that what’s often “lost” in the GENIUS and CLARITY Act discussions is how GENIUS-compliant stablecoins “will actually lead to deposit inflows.”
Community banking exec causes controversy in crypto industry
On Friday, the Independent Bankers Association of Texas president Christopher Williston said that making concessions in the CLARITY Act debate would risk harming local lending and economic production, prompting backlash from the crypto community.
“It’s simply impossible to roll over in the fight for liquidity that powers the economies of the places we call home,” he said.
Related: Republican opposition to CBDC could hold up housing affordability bill
Zero Knowledge Consulting founder Austin Campbell responded that “If community banks and crypto can’t find a way to work together, we already know who the winners are… It is the big banks.”
Witt also chimed in on this debate, saying it “feels like I’m watching an arsonist threaten to burn down their own home.”
Magazine: All 21 million Bitcoin is at risk from quantum computers
Payment transaction volumes among artificial intelligence agents are more than 90% lower than reports suggest, but crypto giants are pouring billions into building the infrastructure around it.
AI agents are starting to buy things, but “the numbers are inconsistent,” Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) partner Noah Levine wrote in an X post on Wednesday.
He said a Bloomberg article on Saturday reported that AI agents made $24 million in payments over a 30-day period, citing data from x402.org.
Levine said that data from Allium Labs shows there have been roughly $3 million in AI agent transactions over the same period. Filtering out wash trades shrinks the estimate to around $1.6 million, he added, adding that it is still very early days.
“The gap tells you how early-stage even the measurement infrastructure is.”
Levine said that most of the AI payment activity is around developer tools. Firecrawl, a platform that turns websites into AI-ready data, sells web scraping for 1 cent per query, Browserbase, an AI-centric web browser, sells browser sessions, while AI image platform Freepik sells image generation.
“These companies all accept cards, but x402 lets a developer or agent try the tool once without committing to a subscription,” Levine noted.
x402 is a simple payment standard developed by Coinbase that lets AI agents automatically make payments over the internet.
Agentic payments protocol adoption is growing
Levine noted that major payment and internet companies such as Stripe, Cloudflare, and Vercel have integrated x402, while Google has embedded the system into its agent payments protocol.
He added that the $1.6 million in volume “is not a big number, but the infrastructure being built around it is.”
“None of them are betting on $1.6 million a month. They are betting on what the number looks like when agents become the default buyer.”
Related: Alchemy introduces autonomous payment rails for AI agents on Base
Levine said that while humans remain involved, interactions occur through agentic platforms like Claude Code and the OpenClaw personal AI assistant, making transactions semi-autonomous.
Coinbase’s x402 Facilitator Launches on Polygon
Meanwhile, Coinbase announced on Thursday that its x402 Facilitator is adding support for the Ethereum layer-2 network Polygon, allowing developers to accept payments of the stablecoin USDC (USDC) on Polygon, Base, and Solana.
“Networks optimized for quick settlement and minimal fees are essential to make these machine-to-machine payments viable,” it stated.
“Very soon, there are going to be more AI agents than humans making transactions,” Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong said on Monday.
Magazine: Crypto loves Clawdbot/Moltbot, Uber ratings for AI agents: AI Eye
India’s premier investigative agency, the Central Bureau of Investigation, has arrested Ayush Varshney, co-founder and chief technology officer of Darwin Labs Private Limited, in connection with the alleged GainBitcoin crypto fraud.
Summary
- The Central Bureau of Investigation arrested Ayush Varshney, co-founder of Darwin Labs, in the GainBitcoin fraud probe.
- Investigators say Darwin Labs helped build technical infrastructure linked to the alleged scheme, including the MCAP token and GBMiners platform.
- Varshney was intercepted at Mumbai airport while allegedly attempting to leave India after a Look Out Circular was issued.
CBI arrests GainBitcoin scam suspect at Mumbai airport
The case relates to the GainBitcoin scheme allegedly operated by Variabletech Pte. Ltd., which investigators say functioned as a Ponzi-style investment program that promised unusually high returns to participants who invested in cryptocurrency mining packages.
According to the CBI, funds collected from investors were later misappropriated.
Authorities are investigating the case under several provisions of the Indian Penal Code, including criminal conspiracy, criminal breach of trust and cheating, along with provisions under the Information Technology Act, 2000.
The probe stems from a December 2023 directive by the Supreme Court of India ordering that multiple complaints linked to the GainBitcoin scheme be consolidated and investigated by the CBI as the central agency.
Investigators say Darwin Labs and its co-founders — including Varshney, Sahil Baghla and Nikunj Jain — played a role in the technical development of components associated with the scheme.
These included the design and deployment of a crypto token known as MCAP and its associated ERC-20 smart contract.
Indian authorities allege the firm also built the underlying technological infrastructure used in the operation, including the Bitcoin mining platform GBMiners.com, a bitcoin payment gateway, a crypto wallet known as Coin Bank and the GainBitcoin investor portal.
Varshney had been absconding during the investigation, prompting authorities to issue a Look Out Circular against him. Immigration officials intercepted him at Mumbai airport on March 9 while he was allegedly attempting to leave the country.
He was subsequently taken into custody by the CBI and formally arrested on March 10.
The GainBitcoin case is considered one of India’s largest crypto-related fraud investigations, involving thousands of investors across multiple jurisdictions.
Wells Fargo has filed a trademark application for “WFUSD,” sparking speculation that the U.S. banking giant may be exploring a blockchain-based payment token or stablecoin.
Summary
- Wells Fargo filed a trademark for “WFUSD,” covering crypto-related payment and digital asset services.
- The move may signal exploration of a bank-issued stablecoin or blockchain-based settlement token.
- The filing comes as Wall Street banks prepare for clearer U.S. stablecoin regulation and expanding digital asset adoption.
According to the filing, the mark covers financial services tied to digital assets, including cryptocurrency-related payments and electronic financial transactions.
While Wells Fargo has not announced a product tied to the name, the application has raised the possibility that Wells Fargo could be preparing a dollar-pegged digital asset.
If launched, WFUSD would place the bank among a growing group of major financial institutions experimenting with blockchain-based settlement tools and tokenized payments. Banks have increasingly explored digital tokens as a way to move funds instantly and reduce costs in cross-border or institutional transfers.
The move would also reflect a broader trend of Wall Street firms expanding their crypto strategies. For example, JPMorgan Chase previously launched its blockchain-based payment token, JPM Coin, to facilitate institutional transactions across its internal network.
A potential stablecoin from Wells Fargo could emerge as regulatory clarity around digital dollar tokens improves in the United States. Policymakers have been working toward frameworks that would place stablecoin issuers under stricter oversight, a development that many analysts believe could favor large regulated banks entering the market.
If regulatory rules solidify, traditional financial institutions may become major issuers of dollar-backed digital assets, competing with established stablecoin providers such as Circle and Tether Limited.
For now, the WFUSD filing does not confirm a forthcoming launch, but it shows how major banks are positioning themselves for a financial system increasingly influenced by blockchain-based infrastructure.
Prediction market Kalshi has sued regulators in the US state of Iowa, claiming it did so as there was a risk of an impending enforcement action over its sports event contracts.
Kalshi sued Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird, along with the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission and its board, in an Iowa federal court on Wednesday, claiming there “is a substantial risk” Bird would bring enforcement action to block the company’s event contracts.
In its complaint, Kalshi said a company representative met with Bird for what was believed to be a discussion about a tax bill currently under consideration in the Iowa legislature.
“Instead, he [Kalshi’s representative] was greeted by a panel of attorneys, including Iowa’s Solicitor General, who proceeded to ask a series of pointed questions challenging whether Kalshi’s federally regulated offerings ran afoul of (preempted) Iowa state law,” Kalshi claimed.
After the meeting, Kalshi said it contacted a representative for the Attorney General on Tuesday “to seek assurances that the Iowa AG did not intend to bring an enforcement action against Kalshi.”
“The representative did not provide such assurances,” Kalshi said. “To the contrary, the official said in writing that ‘we will not give any assurances about potential future enforcement.’”
Cointelegraph contacted Bird’s office and the Iowa Racing and Gaming Commission for comment.
Prediction markets fight states over sports contracts
Kalshi’s lawsuit against Iowa is the company’s latest legal action targeted at a US state regulator over whether it can offer event contracts across the US.
In the latest lawsuit, Kalshi argued that “federal law preempts Iowa from subjecting Kalshi to state law,” and as a designated contract market, it is subject to the “exclusive jurisdiction” of the Commodity Futures Trading Commission.
The company has made a similar argument in multiple court cases with other state gambling regulators over the legality of sports event contracts.
Related: US Senate bill targets prediction markets on war and assassinations
Many state regulators have alleged that the contracts, which allow users to bet on the outcome of sporting events, are gambling, subject to separate state-level laws, and are offered without a license.
Federal courts have differed in their response to the lawsuits.
On Monday, an Ohio federal court denied Kalshi’s request to block Ohio regulators from taking action against its sports contracts, saying the company failed to show that they were subject to the CFTC’s jurisdiction.
A federal court in Massachusetts blocked Kalshi from offering event contracts in the state earlier this year, and Nevada sued the company last month after an appeals court knocked back Kalshi’s bid to stop the state from taking action.
Federal courts in New Jersey and Tennessee, in contrast, have sided with Kalshi to temporarily block state regulators from taking action over the company’s sports event contracts.
Magazine: How crypto laws changed in 2025 — and how they’ll change in 2026
Bitcoin price risks a drop back to the $65,000 zone as bearish macroeconomic forces continue to impact investor risk sentiment.
Summary
- Bitcoin price failed to hold the $70,000 support on Thursday.
- Investor demand for risk assets dropped amid surging oil prices and rising U.S. Treasury yields.
- The latest U.S. CPI print came in line with market expectations, which can force the Fed to keep interest rates elevated for a longer period.
According to data from crypto.news, Bitcoin (BTC) price fell 4.8% over the past 7 days, dropping below the $70,000 support level. Trading at $69,385 at the time of writing, the bellwether was nearly 29% below its year-to-date high of around $97,500 and 45% from its all-time high.
Currently, Bitcoin faces a number of geopolitical and macroeconomic risks that could push its price towards $65,000 and subsequently the $60,000 mark.
First, Iran has announced that it would change its retaliation strategy in the Middle East from reciprocal hits to continuous strikes against the interests of its adversaries, a move intended to punish Israel and the United States.
Additionally, Tehran said that it would continue blocking all ships carrying oil to Israel and the United States from using the Strait of Hormuz, where millions of barrels of crude pass through daily.
Through these measures, Iran aims to push crude oil prices to as high as $200, a move that could ultimately lead to higher inflation throughout the world, with the greatest impact coming on the U.S., which remains sensitive to energy price shocks. This escalating tension in the Middle East has historically driven investors away from volatile assets like cryptocurrency and into traditional safe havens.
Second, Wednesday’s U.S. core CPI data for February came in line with market expectations, essentially forcing the Federal Reserve to maintain elevated interest rates for a longer period.
Meanwhile, if the war continues to drive up energy costs, it could fuel inflation further and dampen any hopes for a pivot in monetary policy this year. Higher interest rates typically sap the liquidity necessary for speculative assets to thrive.
According to the CME FedWatch data, there is a 99.3% chance that the interest rates will remain unchanged during the March FOMC meeting, with the current target rate sitting at 350 to 375 basis points. Odds of an April rate cut meanwhile stood at just 10.9% when writing, down sharply from 21% one month earlier.
It should also be noted that February inflation data came without fully accounting for the recent impact of surging oil prices and hence does not reflect the hawkish stance the Fed will be forced to adopt over the coming weeks.
Third, US yields on the 10-year Treasury have continued to go higher as bond markets react to these inflationary pressures. These yields recently rose by several basis points, making the guaranteed returns of government debt far more attractive than the risks associated with digital currencies.
Bitcoin price analysis
In terms of technicals, Bitcoin has once again fallen below the $70,000 mark. Traders are closely watching the $68,500 support level, but persistent selling pressure suggests that the path of least resistance remains to the downside with a potential retracement to the $65,000 support zone until global stability returns.
On the 4-hour chart, momentum indicators suggest that the bearish structure has already started building. The MACD lines are close to confirming a bearish crossover, while the RSI is trending downwards after hitting overbought levels.
Disclosure: This article does not represent investment advice. The content and materials featured on this page are for educational purposes only.
Decentralized finance (DeFi) has long wrestled with the tension between accessibility and risk management. Perpetual contracts, in particular, expose traders to extreme leverage and volatile markets. Traditionally, exchanges apply flat leverage caps or margin requirements, treating all users equally regardless of experience or past behavior. But what if a trader’s identity and reputation could dynamically influence how much risk they can take?
The Concept: Identity-Weighted Leverage
At its core, identity-weighted leverage personalizes risk management for perpetual contracts. Each trader is assigned a “trust score” based on verifiable on-chain data, such as:
-
Historical trading performance – e.g., consistent profits, low liquidation history.
-
Collateral behavior – how often and how responsibly they maintain margin.
-
Social governance participation – involvement in protocol voting or community contributions.
The system then adjusts leverage limits or margin requirements according to this score. A highly trusted trader might access 10x leverage safely, while a new user is throttled to 2x or 3x until they prove reliability.
Gamifying Risk Management
This approach doesn’t just manage risk—it gamifies it. Traders are incentivized to maintain a clean record, engage with governance, and demonstrate disciplined trading. The better your reputation, the more freedom you get to deploy capital. It turns risk management into a socially reinforced game, where positive behavior is rewarded with real financial flexibility.
Benefits for the Ecosystem
-
Safer Markets: Reduces systemic risk by limiting reckless leverage for unproven traders.
-
Aligned Incentives: Encourages responsible trading, increasing protocol trustworthiness.
-
Community Engagement: Integrates social reputation, making governance participation materially valuable.
-
Differentiated User Experience: Traders feel recognized and rewarded for their skill and discipline.
Challenges and Considerations
-
Privacy vs. Transparency: Reputation must be verifiable on-chain without exposing sensitive personal data.
-
Manipulation Risk: Systems must guard against fake histories or social score farming.
-
Standardization: Protocols need consistent metrics for scoring across different platforms.
Future Outlook
Identity-weighted leverage could redefine how DeFi perceives risk and trust. By combining traditional risk management with a social trust layer, perpetual trading becomes more than a numbers game—it becomes a community-powered ecosystem, where credibility and behavior are as valuable as capital.
This paradigm introduces the first real bridge between gamified social reputation and financial leverage, opening the door for more sophisticated, self-regulating DeFi markets.
REQUEST AN ARTICLE
The bitcoin relief rally due to oil losing gains lasted about 36 hours.
Bitcoin fell to $69,393 on Thursday morning, down 0.8% over the past 24 hours and 4.3% on the week, after attacks on two oil tankers in Iraqi waters sent Brent crude surging back above $100 a barrel.
The move wiped out Wednesday’s optimism around the IEA’s proposed record reserve release and pushed risk sentiment back into retreat across Asian markets.
The chart tells the story of a market that can’t catch a break. Bitcoin touched $71,230 late Wednesday evening before the tanker headlines hit, dropping nearly $2,000 in a matter of hours.
That’s the third time in two weeks that bitcoin has pushed above $71,000 only to get knocked back by an escalation in the Middle East conflict.
Brent surged as much as 10.5% on Thursday, driven by a combination of the tanker attacks, clearance of the Mina Al Fahal port in Oman, continued hostilities across the Persian Gulf, and growing doubt about whether the IEA reserve release will be large enough to offset the supply disruption.
MSCI’s Asia Pacific index dropped 1.8% with energy the only sector in the green. The session extended losses as it went on, with no signs of stabilization.
The broader crypto market followed bitcoin lower. Ether fell to $2,025, down 0.5% on the day and 4.5% on the week. Solana dropped 1.5% to $85 and is now down 5.7% over seven days, the worst-performing major. XRP lost 0.8% to $1.37.
Dogecoin fell 0.8% to $0.092, giving back most of Tuesday’s Musk-driven gains. BNB was flat at $642.
The pattern of the past two weeks has been consistent. Good headlines push bitcoin toward $71,000-$74,000. Bad headlines drag it back toward $66,000-$68,000. The net movement over the period is close to zero, which is exactly what the on-chain data has been suggesting.
Apparent demand remains deeply negative at -30,800 BTC on a 30-day basis. CryptoQuant’s bull-bear indicator is still in bear territory, while supply in loss continues to climb. Every bounce gets sold into by holders looking to exit.
Trump said earlier this week the war would resolve “very soon” and that military objectives were “pretty well complete.”
But the timeline remains unclear, Iran continues to strike targets across the region, and the Strait of Hormuz is still disrupted. Mixed messaging from Washington has left markets unable to price the conflict’s duration with any confidence.
The Fed meeting on March 17-18 is now five days away, and oil back above $100 makes the stagflation case harder to dismiss and rate cuts even more distant.
XRP traded quietly near $1.38 as volatility compressed across crypto markets, with traders positioning ahead of U.S. inflation data that could trigger the next directional move.
News Background
- XRP has entered a period of consolidation as broader crypto markets adopt a cautious tone ahead of key macroeconomic data. Investors are closely watching the upcoming U.S. Consumer Price Index release, which could influence Federal Reserve policy expectations and risk appetite across digital assets.
- While price action has been subdued, activity on the XRP Ledger remains elevated. Daily transactions recently climbed above 2.7 million, one of the highest levels in months.
- Institutional positioning has also continued to evolve. XRP-linked investment products have accumulated roughly $1.4 billion in assets since their launch, suggesting longer-term capital remains engaged even as short-term trading momentum slows.
- Meanwhile, Ripple, the blockchain firm closely associated with XRP, has begun a $750 million share buyback that would value the company at about $50 billion, according to a person familiar with the matter.
- The move comes after a $500 million funding round at a $40 billion valuation in November, backed by major hedge funds and crypto investment firms.
Price Action Summary
- XRP slipped slightly from $1.3818 to $1.3787
- The token traded within a relatively tight 2.5% intraday range
- A midday surge briefly pushed price to around $1.41 before rejection
- Support near $1.37 held through several tests late in the session
Technical Analysis
- The most significant move during the session occurred when XRP briefly rallied toward $1.41 on elevated volume before sellers pushed the token back into consolidation. That rejection reinforced the $1.40–$1.41 area as a near-term resistance zone.
- Despite the pullback, buyers repeatedly defended the $1.37–$1.373 region, forming a sequence of higher lows on shorter timeframes. This behavior suggests dip demand remains active even as momentum fades.
- Volatility indicators are now compressing. Bollinger Bands on the daily chart have tightened noticeably, a pattern that often precedes a larger directional move once liquidity returns.
- The current structure leaves XRP trading between resistance near $1.40 and support closer to $1.35–$1.37, creating a tightening range that may resolve soon.
What traders say is next?
- Market participants are focused on whether XRP can maintain support above the $1.35–$1.37 area.
- Holding this zone could allow the token to continue consolidating before another attempt to reclaim the $1.40–$1.42 resistance band.
- A break below $1.35 would weaken the current structure and could expose deeper support around $1.30–$1.32, while a breakout above $1.42 would signal a potential momentum shift toward the mid-$1.40s and higher.
Security researchers have uncovered a flaw in MediaTek’s mobile chipsets that could enable attackers to harvest crypto seed phrases from vulnerable devices simply by connecting a phone to a computer via USB. The vulnerability targets the secure boot chain, a layer designed to boot devices only with authorized software, and was disclosed by Ledger’s white-hat security team, Donjon. A patch was rolled out by MediaTek on January 5, but users who have not updated their devices remain exposed to potential attacks. In practical terms, an assailant with physical access could bypass a device’s protections and access sensitive wallet data without needing to unlock the device, underscoring how far security gaps in consumer hardware can reach in the crypto era.
Ledger notes that roughly a quarter of Android devices rely on MediaTek processors paired with the Trustonic Trusted Execution Environment (TEE), a combination the research found to be particularly exploitable. Donjon demonstrated the proof-of-concept by connecting a Nothing CMF Phone 1 to a laptop and compromising the device’s security in about 45 seconds. The exploit could, in a worst‑case scenario, recover the phone’s PIN, decrypt stored data, and extract seed phrases from popular wallets such as Trust Wallet, Base, Kraken Wallet, Rabby, Tangem’s Mobile Wallet and Phantom, all without requiring the device to be actively unlocked.
Ledger emphasizes that users should apply the January patch promptly, warning that devices left unpatched remain vulnerable to USB-based attacks that bypass the Android protections designed to prevent unauthorized data access. A Ledger spokesperson suggested that the organization does not anticipate the issue to persist as a systemic vulnerability, pointing to the patch as a remedy and noting improvements in hardware and software defenses over time. The broader takeaway is that mobile devices, while increasingly central to crypto management, remain areas of elevated risk when security architectures rely on general-purpose components rather than dedicated protective elements.
As the crypto ecosystem continues to expand, the mobile surface remains a live concern. Ledger’s assessment of the landscape includes a stark reminder that a large share of users store digital assets on smartphones, with the firm citing around 36 million people managing crypto on mobile devices as of early 2025. The implication is not merely about one exploit but about a structural tension between convenience and security in everyday devices. In late 2025, Ledger also revealed testing results on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (MT6878) that reportedly bypassed certain security measures, achieving a level of control over a smartphone that left “no security barrier standing.” These findings echo a longer-standing view from Ledger’s chief technology officer that smartphones—whether Android or iPhone—are inherently challenging to secure for crypto use.
Charles Guillemet has repeatedly underscored the underlying architectural gap between general-purpose chips, which prize convenience, and Secure Elements, which are designed to isolate and protect keys even under duress. In a post on X that followed the December tests, he reiterated a recurring theme: the best practice for protecting seeds is to rely on hardware-backed protections rather than trusting software alone. This sentiment aligns with a broader consensus in the security community that crypto keys deserve an isolated enclave, separate from the rest of the device’s software stack. The implications for wallet developers and hardware makers alike are clear: as fraud vectors evolve, so too must the hardware and the threat models that guide wallet design and user behavior. The ongoing discourse around secure elements, trusted execution environments, and hardware-backed security will likely drive further standards and recommendations for the crypto wallet ecosystem.
In the context of rapidly evolving mobile crypto usage, the incident serves as a reminder that security is not a one-time fix but an ongoing engineering challenge. Beyond patch deployment, users must consider the broader ecosystem: keeping devices updated, enabling additional protections on wallet apps, and staying informed about hardware vulnerabilities that could undermine seed protection. The episode also raises questions for manufacturers and platform providers about the balance between performance, feature parity, and robust security, particularly as mobile devices become the primary entry point for many users into the world of decentralized finance and digital assets.
Overall, the episode reinforces the view that mobile crypto security hinges on a layered strategy: hardware-backed secrets, rigorous boot-time protections, prompt software updates, and wallet designs that minimize the risk surface for seed exposure. While patches provide a necessary remedy, the industry faces a broader imperative to harden the entire stack—from chipset design and secure enclaves to firmware and application guardrails—to ensure that the convenience of mobile crypto management does not come at the expense of fundamental security.
Key takeaways
- The vulnerability resides in MediaTek’s secure boot chain, which could allow an attacker with physical access to bypass protections via USB and access wallet seeds.
- MediaTek released a patch on January 5, but devices that have not updated remain at risk of seed extraction and other data compromise.
- About 25% of Android devices are affected due to the combination of MediaTek processors and the Trustonic TEE, increasing the potential attack surface for seed exposure.
- A proof-of-concept demonstrated on a Nothing CMF Phone 1 achieved compromise in roughly 45 seconds, illustrating how quickly seed data could be extracted from several popular wallets.
- Ledger’s stance emphasizes that smartphones are inherently challenging for crypto security and that hardware-backed protections (e.g., Secure Elements) are essential to safeguarding seeds against physical attacks.
- Beyond the January patch, Ledger disclosed ongoing tests in December 2025 on the MT6878 that reportedly bypassed some security measures, underscoring the persistent need for robust hardware protections.
Sentiment: Neutral
Market context: The incident highlights ongoing risk in mobile crypto usage and the importance of timely firmware updates as users increasingly rely on smartphones for wallets and seed storage, contributing to broader risk sentiment around consumer hardware security.
Why it matters
For users actively managing crypto on mobile devices, the incident translates into a pragmatic reminder: seed phrases are high-value targets, and the most effective defense combines hardware-backed secrecy with disciplined software hygiene. The fact that a single USB connection could bypass protective layers and extract seed data from multiple wallets makes the case for diversified security architectures more compelling. Wallet developers may respond by encouraging or mandating hardware-backed seed storage, integrating stronger attestation, and pushing for standardized, secure boot practices across chipset families. The episode also underscores the role of independent researchers and white-hat teams in disclosing vulnerabilities that could otherwise go undetected until exploited in the wild.
From a market perspective, the event does not single out a particular asset or exchange, but it does shape risk perception around mobile wallet usability. As more users store crypto on smartphones, the potential payoff for attackers grows in tandem with the number of devices deployed and the wallets installed on them. This dynamic heightens the urgency for chipset makers, device manufacturers and wallet providers to collaborate on risk mitigation—outside of mere patch cycles—through architectural safeguards, secure update mechanisms, and clear user guidance on how to defend seeds in non-ideal physical environments.
For the broader ecosystem, the episode also serves as a test case for ongoing debates about hardware security: should smartphones rely on Secure Elements that isolate keys, or should wallets shift seed management to external, user-controlled devices with their own secure channels? The balance struck in design decisions over the next few years will influence the resilience of mobile crypto infrastructure as adoption continues to grow and as regulatory and market pressures push for stronger security guarantees.
What to watch next
- How quickly OEMs and MediaTek push out and verify the January patch across devices shipping with the affected chipsets.
- Whether wallet developers adopt more hardware-backed storage or additional attestation to reduce seed exposure risk on compromised devices.
- Any official guidance from Ledger or other security researchers on best practices for users to mitigate risk while awaiting firmware updates.
- Further testing results from security researchers on MT6878 and related MediaTek platforms to assess the durability of current protections.
Sources & verification
- Ledger’s public statements describing the vulnerability and the patch rollout on January 5.
- Donjon’s demonstration using a Nothing CMF Phone 1 to compromise a device within about 45 seconds.
- Ledger’s December 2025 disclosures about testing an attack on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (MT6878) and bypassing security measures.
- Charles Guillemet’s public comments on smartphone security and the challenges of securing mobile crypto workflows.
Security episode: how a USB-based breach in MediaTek chips could expose seed phrases
The attack scenario centers on the media ecosystem surrounding contemporary smartphones. By exploiting the secure boot chain in MediaTek’s mobile processors, an attacker could connect a device to a PC and proceed without booting into the Android operating system in a conventional sense. The practical upshot is the potential to automatically recover device PINs, decrypt stored data, and extract seed phrases from widely used wallets—Trust Wallet, Base, Kraken Wallet, Rabby, Tangem’s Mobile Wallet, and Phantom—without requiring the user to unlock the phone or enter sensitive credentials. The proof-of-concept demonstrated on the Nothing CMF Phone 1 in roughly 45 seconds underscores how quickly such a breach could occur in a real-world scenario, particularly when users fail to apply patches in a timely manner.
MediaTek’s response to the vulnerability, which included a software patch released on January 5, aims to close the door on the attack by strengthening the integrity of the boot process and reducing the likelihood of unauthorized access to the secure storage that holds seed material. Ledger’s assessment indicates that while the patch is a necessary stopgap, the broader trajectory of mobile crypto security remains a work in progress, especially given the prevalence of devices that rely on Trustonic’s TEE in conjunction with MediaTek chips. The intersection of hardware security with consumer electronics means that even small architectural choices—how keys are isolated, how boot protections are verified, and how protected storage is accessed—can have outsized implications for user safety in the crypto domain.
Looking ahead, the crypto community will be watching whether the January patch is widely adopted across device fleets, how wallet developers respond with additional mitigations, and whether hardware manufacturers continue to push for more robust, hardware-backed protections as a standard feature. The broader message is that seed storage remains a high-value target, and as the mobile economy around digital assets grows, so too must the security controls that protect those seeds—from the moment a device boots up to the moment a user signs a transaction or unlocks a wallet.
Emergency work after Fylingdales Moor wildfire
Atlassian Announces 1,600 Job Cuts as Part of Company’s AI Push
Stablecoin Yields will Bring Fresh Money to US Banks: Patrick Witt
-
Business6 days ago
Form 8K Entergy Mississippi LLC For: 6 March
-
Tech7 days agoBitwarden adds support for passkey login on Windows 11
-
News Videos3 days ago10th Algebra | Financial Planning | Question Bank Solution | Board Exam 2026
-
Fashion5 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Ann Taylor
-
Crypto World3 days agoParadigm, a16z, Winklevoss Capital, Balaji Srinivasan among investors in ZODL
-
Tech23 hours agoA 1,300-Pound NASA Spacecraft To Re-Enter Earth’s Atmosphere
-
Sports7 days ago499 runs and 34 sixes later, India beat England to enter T20 World Cup final | Cricket News
-
Politics6 days agoTop Mamdani aide takes progressive project to the UK
-
Business2 days agoExxonMobil seeks to move corporate registration from New Jersey to Texas
-
Sports4 days agoBraveheart Lakshya downs Lai in epic battle to enter All England Open final | Other Sports News
-
Sports4 days agoThree share 2-shot lead entering final round in Hong Kong
-
NewsBeat12 hours agoResidents reaction as Shildon murder probe enters second day
-
NewsBeat7 days agoPiccadilly Circus just unveiled ‘London’s newest tourist attraction’ and it only costs 80p to enter
-
Entertainment5 days agoHailey Bieber Poses For Sexy Selfies In New Luscious Lip Thirst Traps
-
Business4 days agoSearch for Nancy Guthrie Enters 37th Day as FBI Probes Wi-Fi Jammer Theory
-
Business23 hours agoSearch Enters Sixth Week With New Leads in Tucson Abduction Case
-
NewsBeat2 days agoPagazzi Lighting enters administration as 70 jobs lost and 11 stores close across Scotland
-
Tech3 days agoDespite challenges, Ireland sixth in EU for board gender diversity
-
Tech7 days agoACIP To Discuss COVID ‘Vaccine Injuries’ Next Month, Despite That Not Being In Its Purview
-
Business2 days agoSearch Enters 39th Day with FBI Tip Line Developments and No Major Breakthroughs