Connect with us

Crypto World

What Happens When You Ignore Slippage? One Trader Just Found Out With a $50M Swap

Published

on

What Happens When You Ignore Slippage? One Trader Just Found Out With a $50M Swap


Despite clear warnings, a trader confirmed a massive $50M swap and received just 324 Aave tokens

A user attempted to purchase the AAVE token with $50 million worth of Tether through the Aave interface on March 12, but the trade executed poorly after the user accepted a warning about extreme slippage.

According to Aave Labs founder and CEO Stani Kulechov, the transaction involved a single order of significant size placed through the Aave interface, which integrates routing infrastructure provided by CoW Swap. Because of the unusually large order size, the interface displayed a warning about extraordinary slippage and required explicit confirmation before the swap could proceed.

Advertisement

$50M Trade Gone Wrong

The warning appeared as a confirmation checkbox, which the user had to manually accept before completing the transaction. Kulechov said the user confirmed the warning on a mobile device and chose to proceed with the trade despite the slippage notification. Due to the execution conditions and the liquidity available through the routing path, the user ultimately received only 324 AAVE tokens in return for the $50 million USDT order.

Kulechov stated that the transaction could not have moved forward without the user explicitly acknowledging the warning and confirming acceptance of the associated risks through the interface. He said the routing infrastructure functioned as designed and that the integration with CoW Swap followed standard practices commonly used across the DeFi sector.

However, the final execution was significantly worse than what would typically be expected in a more liquid market environment. Kulechov noted that events involving high slippage can occur in DeFi when users attempt to execute trades that are far larger than the liquidity available in the relevant markets, although he said the scale of this specific transaction was significantly larger than what is normally seen in the space.

In response to the incident, the exec said the Aave team sympathizes with the user and will attempt to establish contact with them. He added that the protocol plans to return approximately $600,000 in fees that were collected from the transaction. Kulechov said that while maintaining the permissionless nature of DeFi remains important, the industry can still build additional guardrails to help reduce the likelihood of similar incidents in the future.

Advertisement

User Freedom vs Protection

CoW Protocol, which is a DEX aggregator, took to X and explained that “preventing users from making trades removes choice and can lead to terrible outcomes in some situations.” It also added that trades like these demonstrate that “DeFi UX still isn’t where it needs to be to protect all users. As a team, we are now reviewing how we balance strong safeguards with preserving user autonomy.”

You may also like:

The platform asserted that it will refund any fees sent to CoW DAO.

The incident quickly drew reactions across the crypto community. A popular crypto analyst, Autism Capital, described the event as a “teachable moment about money.”

Meanwhile, another crypto commentator, KJ Crypto, questioned the motivation behind such a large purchase attempt and tweeted that it raises questions about why someone would want to acquire $50 million worth of Aave in a single transaction.

Advertisement
SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

JPMorgan Flags Sharp Divergence Between Bitcoin and Gold ETF Flows Since Iran War

Published

on

🔀

The correlation between Bitcoin (BTC) and gold has snapped under the pressure of the Iran conflict, according to a note to investors by JPMorgan.

While geopolitical instability usually drives a unified bid for safe havens, the two assets are currently moving in opposite directions.

This decoupling reveals a significant shift in how capital is treating “digital gold” versus the real thing.

Instead of moving in tandem as crisis hedges, investors are aggressively rotating capital, creating a clear winner in the ETF market since late February.

Advertisement

Discover: The best crypto to buy now

What the JPMorgan ETF Flow Data Actually Shows About Bitcoin

Since the conflict escalated on Feb. 27, JPMorgan analysts report a stark divergence in capital flows. The largest gold ETF, SPDR Gold Shares (GLD), has bled outflows totaling roughly 2.7% of its assets under management.

In contrast, BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) absorbed inflows equaling roughly 1.5% of its assets during the same window.

JPMorgan analysts, led by Managing Director Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, highlighted in their recent note to investors that this reverses the trend seen earlier in the year when gold funds held the advantage.

The data is unambiguous. While gold has traditionally been the default safety trade during Middle East tensions, capital is currently voting for Bitcoin exposure.

Institutional positioning generally reflects a shift away from bullion in favor of the spot Bitcoin ETFs, despite the higher volatility inherent in crypto assets.

Advertisement

Interestingly, IBIT inflows since the start of 2024 are now roughly double the total accumulation seen by GLD, further cementing the shift in dominance among exchange-traded products.

Is Bitcoin Replacing Gold as the Crisis Hedge?

The divergence goes deeper than headline flows. JPMorgan notes that while spot Bitcoin ETFs are seeing inflows, institutional derivatives markets paint a more cautious picture. Hedge funds appear to be reducing direct Bitcoin exposure even as ETF buyers step up.

Short interest in IBIT has actually increased since the conflict began, while GLD short interest declined. This narrows the gap between the two, suggesting that hedge funds are hedging their crypto bets while favoring gold for pure defensive positioning.

Advertisement

This creates a complex market structure. Retail and registered investment advisors (RIAs) are likely driving the ETF bid, treating Bitcoin as a risk-off asset alongside the dollar. Meanwhile, sophisticated desks are hedging downside risk as oil surges past $100, a macro factor that typically pressures risk assets.

Options activity supports this cautious institutional stance. The demand for downside protection in Bitcoin has risen, contrasting with the relentless buying pressure in the spot ETF market. However, the sheer magnitude of the rotation, selling gold to buy Bitcoin, suggests the “digital gold” narrative is holding up under fire better than skeptics anticipated.

Bitcoin Price Prediction: Can BTC Hold the $70,000 Level?

Advertisement

Price action remains resilient despite the mixed signals from derivatives markets. Even with war-driven inflation fears dominating the headlines, Bitcoin is trading above $70,000, showing strength where legacy assets have faltered.

JPMorgan Flags Sharp Divergence Between Bitcoin and Gold ETF Flows Since Iran War
Source: TradingView

Bull Scenario: If ETF inflows persist at this 1.5% pace, Bitcoin targets the $80,000 resistance band. Clearing that level opens the path to retest all-time highs. JPMorgan’s own valuation models have previously flagged Bitcoin as undervalued relative to gold regarding volatility-adjusted capital, suggesting room for an upside squeeze.

Bear Scenario: Should macro liquidity tighten further, support sits firm at $64,000. A break below this level would validate the rising short interest and likely force a flush of the recent leverage. Traders must watch the $70,000 midpoint closely; losing it would signal that the safe-haven bid has exhausted itself.

The next major catalyst isn’t just on the chart; it’s at the Federal Reserve. If oil prices stay high, inflationary pressure could force central banks to keep rates elevated longer, testing the resilience of both gold and Bitcoin.

Discover: The next crypto to explode

Advertisement

The post JPMorgan Flags Sharp Divergence Between Bitcoin and Gold ETF Flows Since Iran War appeared first on Cryptonews.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Hong Kong to Approve First Stablecoin Licenses for Banks

Published

on

Hong Kong to Approve First Stablecoin Licenses for Banks

HSBC Holdings and a joint venture led by Standard Chartered are reportedly set to become the first authorized stablecoin issuers in Hong Kong.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) is expected to issue stablecoin licenses to HSBC and Standard Chartered, the South China Morning Post reported Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter. HSBC and Standard Chartered are set to be in the first batch as authorities reportedly prioritize institutions already authorized to issue banknotes in the city.

The Hong Kong government, through the HKMA, authorizes banknote issuance to three commercial banks, including local branches of HSBC, Standard Chartered and the Bank of China.

The Hong Kong Monetary Authority has not confirmed the names of any successful applicants. Standard Chartered declined to comment, and HSBC did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Advertisement

The approvals would mark a major step toward Hong Kong’s ambition to become a global digital asset hub despite neighboring mainland China reportedly making it harder to launch stablecoins in the region.

HKMA targets the first stablecoin licenses in March

According to the SCMP, the number of licenses and timetable had yet to be finalized and remained subject to change, but the sources indicated a possible date on March 24.

Though unconfirmed, potential stablecoin issuer licenses for HSBC and Standard Chartered would align with earlier reports that the HKMA planned to grant the first licenses in March 2026.

Hong Kong has not yet approved any stablecoin issuer. Source: HKMA

HKMA Chief Executive Eddie Yue said in February that the regulator expects the first batch of stablecoin issuer licenses to include a “very small number” of issuers.

The Hong Kong government enforced the Stablecoin Ordinance, a statutory framework for regulating stablecoins, in August 2025, making it illegal to offer or promote unlicensed fiat-referenced stablecoins to retail investors.

Advertisement

Related: China’s Alibaba joins stablecoin platform MetaComp’s $35M fundraise

In September, the HKMA said it received applications from 36 institutions for a license to issue stablecoins. HSBC and Standard Chartered were among the institutions that were reported to be planning to apply, alongside the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China.

Magazine: China’s ‘50x’ blockchain boost, Alibaba-linked AI mines Bitcoin: Asia Express