Connect with us

Politics

How a top DC strategist courted Jeffrey Epstein

Published

on

How a top DC strategist courted Jeffrey Epstein

Leading Washington strategist Juleanna Glover publicly argued for a third-party presidential candidate halfway through Donald Trump’s first term, calling for a “morally lucid” leader akin to abolitionist Abraham Lincoln.

At the same time, she was privately trading emails with Jeffrey Epstein — a decade after he went to jail on child prostitution charges — to share possible presidential tickets “outside the partisan lanes.”

Glover even offered some “radical combinations” in an August 2018 email to a group of “third party thinkers” she then forwarded to Epstein via his now infamous address jeevacation@gmail.com. Her list of dream tickets mixed and matched figures like former Facebook executive Sheryl Sandberg, former Republican Govs. Larry Hogan of Maryland and Nikki Haley of South Carolina, and Microsoft tycoon Bill Gates, coincidentally an Epstein associate himself.

Glover proposed: “Biden/Romney? Bill Gates/Hogan? Bloomberg/Haley? Howard Schultz/Bob Corker? Sandberg/Kasich?”

Advertisement

Their correspondence about centrist fantasy politics was only a small piece of a professional and political relationship that stretched across more than a year. Their workaday messages about third party campaigns, conversations that could have easily been with a well-regarded opinion columnist, underline the degree to which a large number of influential people treated Epstein as if he was just another rich guy to be courted rather than a convicted sex criminal with a troublesome reputation.

Glover, who has long been a leading Never Trump figure, told POLITICO in an interview that her motivation for engaging with Epstein was solely focused on unearthing any potential information that could sink Trump’s reelection.

Despite that claim, there are no emails between Glover and Epstein that show her soliciting information from him about Trump. While she referred POLITICO to a fellow Never Trumper to corroborate that motivation, a second person involved in some of her interactions with Epstein at the time, said they were not aware of her approach.

And in an interview, Glover acknowledged she had also asked Epstein for help in a business matter in 2017 involving her then-most prominent client, Elon Musk, and Saudi Arabia. In one Tesla-related email, Glover said that if Epstein was advising any sovereign wealth funds wanting to help “a prominent company go private,” she could help. In the second email to Glover, Epstein criticized Musk for not being “fluent” in how to deal with Middle Easterners’ “bluster” and “bloviating bragging” after Saudi funding did not come through.

Advertisement

Glover took a stab at helping reintroduce Epstein to parts of mainstream society and made a brief attempt to fashion him into a champion of democracy, arranging a meeting with the head of the nonprofit group Freedom House in 2017. And it wasn’t just Glover advising Epstein — he also offered suggestions on how to talk to New York Times reporters writing about Musk’s rumored drug use.

Glover’s and Epstein’s relationship encompassed several dozen emails, two in-person meetings and a number of calls, according to a POLITICO review of the Epstein files released by the Department of Justice. Her name returns 191 results in the files, although many mentions are duplicates.

Glover characterized the relationship as a limited series of interactions comprised of 31 emails that she sent him, of which 12 dealt with logistics and 15 regarded Tesla. (The Tesla emails showed that Glover was leveraging the relationship with Epstein to help her client.) She said they had two meetings and three calls. She said the remaining were two emails on third party politics, one on MAGA stalwart Steve Bannon and the last connecting Epstein to a pro-democracy nonprofit. Glover said that he was never a client and she “never took anything of value from him.”

Their dynamic, catalogued here in full for the first time, further demonstrates the expansive reach of the late sex offender’s connections across the political spectrum. His Rolodex ranged from moderate former Republicans like Glover to Bannon and giants of the American left like Noam Chomsky.

Advertisement

Glover, a former aide in the George W. Bush White House and an adviser to John McCain’s presidential campaign, had by 2017 largely moved on from professional electoral politics and built a thriving practice as an adviser to executives and corporations seeking to navigate the media landscape.

Her townhouse in Kalorama is a gathering place for a wide array of D.C. operators, think tankers, campaign funders and journalists. She has built goodwill across the town and a thriving personal network in part with her willingness to host book parties, new job celebrations and more: Indeed — she was a co-host of an engagement party in 2023 for the author of this article, and has thrown book parties for multiple past and present POLITICO reporters.

Glover consulted for Axel Springer, POLITICO’s owner, several years ago, according to a company spokesperson.

‘Captive’ to Elon Musk

Glover came to know Epstein through another type of fixer who was also advising him on PR strategies. The journalist Michael Wolff, a shared acquaintance of the two, first mentioned Glover to Epstein in March 2017 as she was consulting for Musk.

Advertisement

“I rolled the dice when Michael Wolff asked me to meet with Epstein against the backdrop of Epstein talking publicly about Trump,” she said in a statement. “My interactions with Epstein were in service to that objective; not to help him in any way or improve his image. Wolff was seemingly positioning me as someone smart enough for him to take advice from.

“To wit, I repeatedly steered Epstein to talk to top investigative journalists including Jim Stewart of the NY Times and Epstein eventually did so, ultimately talking to Stewart about writing his book. I never knew what Epstein was planning to say, but a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist almost found out,” she said, referring to Stewart.

At the time of her interactions with Epstein about Stewart, Musk’s move to try to take Tesla private led to a Securities and Exchange Commission probe and rumors of drug use. He needed all the communications help he could get.

“[T]here’s a Washington PR type named Juleanna Glover with whom you might want to ch=t,” Wolff wrote to Epstein that spring. “Elon Musk basically owns her now and I’m not sure she can take on o=her clients, but she will have a valuable perspective on how you get to wh=ere you want to be.”

Advertisement

Two months later with the subject line “More PR,” Wolff reminded Epstein that they had spoken about Glover, reupping the Musk connection.

“She’s captive to him, so not hireable. But she’s exceedingly smart and well connected and has interesting things to say,” he wrote. “She can offer an extremely informed overview on how to think about larger steps. Not so much about the trial per se, but going forward. Anyway she is in NYC on Thursday with some time if you wanted me to arrange a meeting.”

Within an hour, Epstein wrote back, “Yes please.”

Three days later, Epstein, Glover and Wolff had lunch together on a day that Epstein was set to have breakfast with private equity investor Leon Black and dinner with director Woody Allen and his wife Soon Yi Previn, according to his schedule. (Black has been accused of sexual assault by two women but has denied all allegations.)

Advertisement

Wolff has written books critical of the president and in 2016 even told Epstein “you’re the Trump bullet” to stop his rise given their former relationship. Last November, Wolff posted an Instagram video in which he said, “These two men, Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump, had the closest of relationships for more than a decade.”

Trump has said he wasn’t involved in any of Epstein’s criminal activity and that they had a falling out years ago. Epstein was once a frequent visitor at Mar-a-Lago and court records indicate that Trump flew at least once on one of Epstein’s planes and his phone numbers were in Epstein’s directory. There’s no evidence to suggest Trump took part in Epstein’s trafficking operation.

Wolff said in a statement that he worked on an effort with Glover to get Trump to publicly respond to questions about his relationship with Epstein during the 2016 presidential campaign. Glover said that Wolff had called her in the fall of 2015 to try to have reporters ask Trump about Epstein. That’s why Wolff emailed Epstein that year regarding how Trump might handle questions about their shared history.

“In 2017, I encouraged Juleanna to see Epstein in the hope that she might help convince him to go public about what he knew about Trump,” he said. “I believe she suggested to Epstein that Jim Stewart at the Times would be receptive.”

Advertisement

Glover referred POLITICO to an anti-Trump political consultant, Rick Wilson, with whom she had been in touch about Epstein in 2015, years before her correspondence with Epstein began.

Wilson told POLITICO that he and Glover had a phone call in the fall of 2015 to try to figure out if Epstein had any dirt on Trump.

“She’s a great communicator, and that’s why people seek her out, and that’s why she was so valuable in this anti-Trump fight at the time,” he said. “She was definitely in the pursuit of trying to stop Trump.”

In the summer of 2018 she asked Epstein about Stewart, who was writing a piece on Musk.

Advertisement

“Do you like Jim Stewart?” she wrote to Epstein in August 2018. “Will send him to you for deep backgound [sic] convo if y=u like? But only if you like.”

“[N]o thanks,” Epstein replied. “I live in dark background.”

During several days in August, the two exchanged emails and calls about Musk, who was looking for wealthy investors to buy out shareholders.

“If you are advising re: sovereign wealth funds looking to help a prominent company go private, let me know if I can help w any approp additional information,” she wrote Epstein on Aug. 12.

Advertisement

“Clever,” he replied. She also offered a primer on how Tesla’s Autopilot worked.

Epstein passed along names of potential candidates to join Tesla’s board, suggesting former Treasury Secretary Larry Summers, former Obama White House counsel Kathy Ruemmler and Margaret Thatcher, not realizing she had been dead for five years. (Summers and Ruemmler have apologized for their connections to Epstein and left their jobs after their ties to him were highlighted in the files.)

Epstein also offered to “help shape your story” and gave Glover advice on how Musk should talk on the record to Stewart or then-Times reporter Landon Thomas Jr. about the situation.

“Will try,” Glover replied.

Advertisement

Two days after Epstein’s death, Stewart wrote a column recounting a meeting he had with Epstein in which he claimed to know information about wealthy and famous people that was “potentially damaging or embarrassing, including details about their supposed sexual proclivities and recreational drug use.”

Thomas Jr. left the Times in 2019 after he solicited a major charitable gift from Epstein, who’d been a source, according to an investigation by NPR and a statement the publication made to the New York Post. Thomas Jr. declined to comment to NPR and didn’t respond to a request for comment from POLITICO.

Stewart said in a statement that he wasn’t aware at the time of any relationship between Glover and Epstein and didn’t know about anything Epstein might have told her.

“As I would with any potential source, I reached out to Epstein because I’d heard he was recruiting board members for Tesla at the behest of Musk,” he said. “Epstein wanted to meet in person, so I went to his townhouse. (I subsequently wrote about that encounter.) I don’t recall using anything Epstein had to say in any story about Musk. He certainly didn’t ‘shape’ any story I was involved in.”

Advertisement

Times spokesperson Danielle Rhoades-Ha said in a statement that Thomas Jr. hadn’t worked at the Times since 2019 “after editors discovered his failure to abide by our ethical standards. Times editors were not aware at the time of Thomas’s now-public emails with Epstein.”

Referring to Musk, Epstein told her that he only said “great things about your boy” while sharing that “some of the papers are looking into whether you [sic] boy was on drugs.” He then asked Glover if there are “different colors of cocaine. ? ! ectasy [sic]. (I know zero about drugs).”

“Nothing to it,” she replied. “He barely even drinks.” She acknowledged three days later, “Oh and re burning man, he hasn’t gone in years but may go w his musician girlfriend the last weekend in aug – that is the best the rumor mongers can do.”

After the Times published the interview, Elon Musk Details ‘Excruciating’ Personal Toll of Tesla Turmoil, Epstein emailed Glover, saying “good work – interview apart from the one short seller comment. :)”

Advertisement

Glover responded: “Glad you think it improves situation.”

The exchanges about Musk show how their relationship was a give-and-take compared to a more formal adviser-client set up with Epstein giving positive feedback to one of the nation’s leading communications strategists on her own media approach. At the same time, Glover also steadfastly defended her client, insisting he didn’t do drugs less than a month before he smoked marijuana live on The Joe Rogan Experience.

Glover said that her interactions with Epstein about Musk came during a tense time as Tesla’s leadership was pushing hard to take the company private, which Musk had announced the Saudis and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman were key to getting done.

“Epstein had bragged that he was close to MBS, so I reached out,” she told POLITICO. “Musk was unaware that I’d done so. I shared publicly available information about the company, with the intent that Epstein would advise the Saudis to hold steady on their commitment to Musk to take the company private. I was trying to encourage him to weigh in with the Saudis to keep their word to Musk. I do not believe he was in any way useful to this effort as there are no known communications with MBS in the DOJ files.”

Advertisement

Musk didn’t respond to requests for comment.

An attempt at a pro-democracy rehabilitation

Glover’s firm Ridgely Walsh emphasizes “bespoke public affairs services” and the DOJ files reveal the kind of strategic matchmaking services she might offer clients. For Epstein, who needed to burnish his image, she found an advocacy group in need of funding.

After their first lunch meeting in May 2017, Epstein thanked Glover for her time and said he was happy to meet the leadership of the democracy nonprofit Freedom House as he tried to overhaul his public reputation after he pleaded guilty in 2008 to soliciting prostitution from a minor and was sentenced to 18 months in jail. (He served 13 months on a work release program that allowed him to go to his office during most days.)

“The pro- democracy fund=ng is a good idea, no matter what positive fallout it may have on me perso=ally,” he wrote.

Advertisement

He also invited Glover and a guest to see the Tony-award winning play Oslo, in which he bragged that he had bought out the entire Vivian Beaumont Theater at Lincoln Center so that many U.N. diplomats could attend. “[Y]ou would be part of the private gatherings. Many interesting people will attend,” he noted.

Glover doesn’t appear to have replied to Epstein’s invitation but seven weeks later she told Epstein she had secured a date for Michael Abramowitz, the then-head of Freedom House, to come see him. They were all supposed to meet in person on July 24, but Epstein ended up being out of town so the three joined a call. Glover, who has long worked for international dissidents of various stripes, connected the two via email after the call with Abramowitz responding, “nice to meet you. Talk soon I hope.”

A month later, Abramowitz emailed Epstein, saying he hoped he had a good summer and had enjoyed talking to him. While he sent four attachments about the organization, Epstein had the brusque reply “thx” with a link to an article on HuffPost promoting his work funding scientists. (The articleno longer appears on HuffPost.)

The pair ups didn’t always work, although for Freedom House the mismatch turned out to be a positive. Numerous politicians have had to give away Epstein donations to charitable causes and other figures associated with the late sex offender have lost their jobs or resigned from posts.

Advertisement

Freedom House referred a request for comment to Abramowitz.

“I was asked to have a conversation with him about philanthropy,” Abramowitz said in a statement. “It was a brief phone call, and Freedom House never accepted money from him.”

Glover said she connected Epstein to Abramowitz because Epstein was interested in funding nonprofits. Glover and her firm have experience working with pro-democracy efforts including work on the Magnitsky Act, much of which she does pro-bono. (The Magnitsky Act allows the U.S. government to punish foreign officials for human rights abuses.)

“We do much work in the pro-democracy space, so I asked Freedom House to talk to Epstein about what overseas nonprofits might prove to be the most effective in supporting democracy efforts in Russia and Eastern Europe (at that time Russians were in the streets in large numbers protesting Putin),” she said.

Advertisement

“There was was also growing awareness about Putin directing interference in the U.S. 2016 election and the U.S. was certainly not going to step up to support free elections given Trump’s growing closeness to Putin so I suggested Epstein do it,” Glover said.

“I suspected these foreign groups would welcome his money in their vital, but cash-strapped work,” she added. “I have apologized to the good leaders of Freedom House for connecting this storied institution to this monster. Nothing came of that conversation. Epstein of course lied about his intent and/or ability to marshal money.”

A warning about Steve Bannon

There were tensions embedded in Epstein’s relationship with Glover, a classic establishment GOP operator, and his similarly newfound friendship with Bannon, the conservative firebrand who was separately giving him strategic advice. It’s an illustration of Epstein’s success at cracking the political world that he was able to maintain relations with both of them.

In their 2018 correspondence about unconventional presidential tickets, Epstein took care to write “(not bannon)” when telling Glover that his other “friends with great knowledge of the system” thought the third party idea was “brilliant.”

Advertisement

Glover replied back with a link to a New York Times op-ed she authored about third parties “that says something of the same.”

In December 2018, Epstein replied back to a blast from Glover sharing a POLITICO Magazine op-ed she had written about how Joe Biden should run on a unity ticket with Mitt Romney.

“[Y]ou are right of course,” Epstein wrote.

Months earlier, Glover passed along a request by the BBC to put the outlet in touch with Wolff about Epstein. Wolff forwarded it to Epstein, who told him to get more information on the matter.

Advertisement

“On the job,” Wolff replied.

Glover emailed him to say she was going to be in New York City the next day and wanted to check in. Epstein wrote back that he “would have loved to however i am in the caribean [sic] please try again next time.”

“Will do,” Glover replied. “Take care.”

In April, Glover checked in again to ask if Epstein would be free in a few days in New York City, adding “Hope all is well.” He told her he was not in town that day. But the two met up in July after Glover emailed him again asking if he was in Manhattan, adding “Hope all is great.”

Advertisement

On her way to the meeting at his Upper East Side mansion, she apologized for being a few minutes late, saying “I am so sorry!”

Among the topics of discussion at their meeting was Epstein’s dealings with Bannon.

“On reflection, I don’t think any good can come from Steve being in your sphere,” Glover wrote to Epstein the next day. “I have only met him once but there is a malice and manipulative vengeful nature there that can only cause you harm. He will use his access to you to leverage something unwelcome – not sure what, but he’s conjuring dark forces and access to you is only energizing him.”

Epstein thanked her, and added, “I will take advice.” (Despite telling her that, hecontinued to talk to Bannon up until his arrest the next year on new sex trafficking charges and sat down for interviews with Bannon for a documentary he was making.)

Advertisement

Asked why she had warned Epstein about Bannon, Glover told POLITICO that Epstein had mentioned to her he was seeing Bannon later in the day during their July 2018 meeting. “I warned Epstein away from Bannon, as I thought Bannon would block Epstein from saying what he knew about Trump,” she said.

A spokesperson for Bannon declined to comment.

The last instance of Glover in the files is in March 2019 when Epstein emailed hera link to a letter to the editor of the Times that his four lawyers had written defending Epstein and saying “the number of young women involved in the investigation has been vastly exaggerated.” It continued that the earlier “case lacked the credible and compelling proof that is required by federal criminal statutes.”

She did not reply.

Advertisement

He died by suicide in his New York jail cell five months later on Aug. 10, 2019.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Politics

Putin’s Aide Blames British Specialists Over Ukraine Strike

Published

on

Putin's Aide Blames British Specialists Over Ukraine Strike

Russia has blamed “British specialists” for helping Ukraine execute a deadly missile strike on a munitions factory.

Kyiv said it had struck one of Russia’s “most important military factories” on Tuesday, known as the Kremniy El plant, using British-supplied Storm Shadow missiles.

The site is the second-largest microelectronics manufacturer in Russia.

According to Russian authorities, at least seven civilians were killed and 42 injured in what it called a “terrorist missile attack”.

Advertisement

The Kremlin’s spokesperson, Dmitry Peskov, told reporters: “It is obvious that the launch of these missiles was impossible without British specialists.

“We are aware of this, we know it well, and we naturally take it into account.

“In order to prevent such barbaric actions by the Kyiv regime from continuing, the special military operation is being conducted.”

Russia’s foreign ministry also claimed the attack was premeditated.

Advertisement

It said: “Western states bear full responsibility for the consequences of this strike, which resulted in civilian casualties.

“Britain has gone beyond the norms of international law and is ready… to take the conflict to a fundamentally new level.”

But Ukrainians rejected that analysis, saying the strike targeted the facility itself not civilian infrastructure.

A UK official also told Ukrainian outlet, the Kyiv Independent, that Britain’s support for Kyiv reflects the country’s “clear right of self-defence against Russia’s illegal attacks”.

Advertisement

“We are clear that the equipment provided by the UK is intended for the defence of Ukraine. Ukraine has the right of self-defence,” the official said.

They also made it clear they do not “comment on operational details” when asked about Russia’s claim of direct UK involvement in that operation.

The UK has been sending missiles to Ukraine since May 2023 for use against Russia-occupied territories.

The criticism from Russia comes as Vladimir Putin continues to fight his war of attrition over Ukrainian land.

Advertisement

He already holds a fifth of the neighbouring European country but continues to push for more territory, even as the US attempts to negotiate new peace deals – efforts torpedoed by Putin’s refusal to compromise on his maximalist war aims.

Russia has consistently criticised the UK and other Ukrainian allies throughout the four-year war, even falsely blaming Britain for starting the war.

It’s worth remembering there is an international arrest warrant out for Putin himself for the alleged abduction of Ukrainian children.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Two Strength Tests Can Predict Your Longevity After 60

Published

on

Two Strength Tests Can Predict Your Longevity After 60

You might already know that a person’s grip strength correlates strongly with their overall health, ageing status, strength, bone density, cognitive ability, sleep, and more.

A new paper published in JAMA Network Open, which involved over 5,000 women aged 63-99, looked at how both grip strength and a “sit-to-stand” chair rise correlated to mortality.

After eight years of follow-up, they found that women who did well in both tests were less likely to die in the years after the first tests.

How did they measure both strength tests?

Advertisement

The grip strength test was measured in kilograms. The more pressure you apply to an object – like a tool called a hand dynamometer – when you squeeze it, the higher that kilogram figure is.

For every seven extra kilograms in the grip test, participants had a 12% lower mortality risk on average.

The unassisted sit-to-stand chair raises involved getting up from a seated position in a chair to standing without assistance, eg, leaning on something or pushing against an object, as quickly as possible.

They tracked participants’ speed in seconds for five unassisted sit-to-stand chair raises.

Advertisement

“When it came to chair stands, moving from the slowest time to the fastest time in 6-second increments, researchers saw a 4% lower mortality rate,” the University of Buffalo, whose researchers were involved in the study, said.

Why might strength be so linked to longevity?

“If you don’t have enough muscle strength to get up, it is going to be hard to do aerobic activities, such as walking, which is the most commonly reported recreational activity in U.S. adults ages 65 and older,” the study’s lead author, Dr Michael LaMonte, told the University of Buffalo.

“Muscular strength, in many ways, enables one to move their body from one point to another, particularly when moving against gravity… When we [can] no longer get out of the chair and move around, we are in trouble.”

Advertisement

Interestingly, the benefits of greater strength seemed to hold even when participants didn’t meet exercise guidelines for 150 minutes a week.

“We also showed that differences in body size did not explain the muscular strength relationship with death,” Dr LaMonte said. “When we scaled the strength measures to body weight and even to lean body mass, there remained significantly lower mortality.”

How can I stay strong as I age?

The research suggests that maintaining strength as we age is key to better health outcomes.

Advertisement

“Healthy ageing probably is best pursued through adequate amounts of both aerobic and muscle-strengthening physical activities,” the researcher said.

You don’t need to pump iron daily to reap the benefits, Dr LaMonte suggested: “Even using soup cans or books as a form of resistance provides stimulus to skeletal muscles and could be used by individuals for whom other options are not feasible”.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Tim Roth Talks Turning Down Role Of Snape In Harry Potter Movies

Published

on

Tim Roth Talks Turning Down Role Of Snape In Harry Potter Movies

As part of a new interview with VT, the Reservoir Dogs actor sat down with co-star Rebecca Ferguson to promote the new Peaky Blinders film, when the topic of conversation somehow turned to Harry Potter.

Spurred on by Rebecca, Tim reluctantly admitted: “I was almost in it.”

“They asked me to be in it,” he elaborated, before explaining why he ultimately chose not to pursue the role. “I initially said yes and then I thought ‘No, I’ll just [always] be Snape, that’ll be it’.”

Obviously, that role very famously went to Alan Rickman who played the creepy-but-complex Hogwarts professor in all eight of the Harry Potter films between 2001 and 2011, becoming synonymous with Snape for many generations.

Advertisement

It was previously reported that Tim had auditioned to play Snape, but ended up choosing to star in The Planet Of The Apes instead – which was filming at the same time – after deeming it too much to appear in both.

Alan was on author JK Rowling’s original “wishlist of actors” given to the film’s producers from the off, along with Robbie Coltrane, Richard Harris and Maggie Smith, who went on to play Hagrid, Dumbledore and Professor McGonagall, respectively.

Peaky Blinders: The Immortal Man is currently in select cinemas, ahead of its release on Netflix later this month.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The Ultimate Guide To Better Sleep

Published

on

The Ultimate Guide To Better Sleep

Expert comment provided by Dr Sophie Bostock, founder of The Sleep Scientist.

Want to hear something a little depressing? The average adult only gets three night’s good sleep a week, research from the Mental Health Foundation found.

In fact, 14% of those asked said they don’t get enough sleep to function normally on any day of the week.

But what is good sleep to begin with, and how can we improve ours?

Advertisement

HuffPost UK spoke to sleep expert Dr Sophie Bostock about what great sleep looks like, how to tell if you’re not well-rested, the mistakes too many of us make, and how to make it better.

What is “good sleep” anyway?

A “normal” sleep range for healthy adults is anywhere from seven to nine hours a night.

But Dr Bostock said counting the hours isn’t the only way to tell if you’re sleeping well.

Advertisement

“The best measure of how well you’re sleeping is how you feel during the day,” she explained.

“For most adults, healthy sleep means around 7-9 hours of sleep, at a similar time each night, falling asleep within about 15–30 minutes, and waking up feeling reasonably refreshed.

“Good sleepers aren’t perfect sleepers. Brief awakenings during the night are normal – the key is whether your sleep leaves you feeling capable and alert during the day.”

How can I tell if I’m not getting enough sleep?

Advertisement

Tiredness is such a common complaint among adults that it can be hard to tell when you’re truly poorly-rested.

But Dr Bostock told me there are signs.

“If you answer yes to two or more of the [below statements I’d suggest you’d benefit from more, or better quality sleep,” she said:

  • Do you lie in at weekends or rest days?

  • Do you press the snooze button multiple times?

  • Do you rely on sugar or caffeine to get you through the day?

  • Do you find yourself dozing off during the day in long meetings, on trains, or on the sofa?

  • Do you struggle to concentrate or feel irritable for no reason?

What are some common sleep mistakes?

Advertisement

The two most common sleep mistakes Dr Bostock sees are from “either ends of the ‘sleep worry’ spectrum,” she said.

The first issue is “not prioritising sleep enough,” or “treating sleep as optional – squeezing it around work, screens and social commitments”.

That can wear on your body and mind fast.

And in the other extreme, some people struggle with “worrying about sleep too much – trying too hard to sleep, which can trigger the stress response and keep the brain alert”.

Advertisement

Some sleep experts have warned against “orthosomnia,” an obsession with sleep that can paradoxically keep you up at night.

How can I improve my sleep?

Luckily, Dr Bostock said that getting better sleep is usually easier than most of us imagine.

“Sleep thrives on consistency,” she said.

Advertisement

“The most powerful habits are surprisingly simple: keep your wake-up time fairly consistent, get out into natural light during the day, and build a short wind-down buffer before bed.

“Protecting a dark, cool, quiet sleep environment can also make a big difference – even something as simple as a sleep mask can help support deeper rest.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

No Talk Between Starmer And Mandelson Over US Ambassador Role

Published

on

No Talk Between Starmer And Mandelson Over US Ambassador Role

Downing Street has admitted that Keir Starmer did not speak to Peter Mandelson directly before appointing him to be US ambassador.

The prime minister is facing intense scrutiny over the decision to give the former Labour peer such a senior role, despite his well-known friendship with the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

The Times reported overnight that Starmer delegated the vetting of Mandelson to two personal friends of the peer.

The prime minister was also warned by his national security adviser Jonathan Powell that the vetting process seemed “weirdly rushed”, while the head of the Foreign Office Sir Philip Barton also raised concerns.

Advertisement

When asked by reporters if it’s true the prime minister did not speak to Mandelson directly before giving him the job, Starmer’s spokesperson said: “The full process at the time of the appointment was followed.

“There is no requirement for a formal interview with the prime minister as part of that process.

“The prime minister received advice on options surrounding the appointment, as well as due diligence advice in the usual way.

“As you know the due diligence noted public reporting on Peter Mandelson’s relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.

Advertisement

“Questions were then put to Mandelson by advisers in No.10.”

The representative added: “Peter Mandelson responded, but it’s clear that there are lessons to be learnt from this and shortcomings in that process have been highlighted.”

He said: “A number of reforms have been brought in and the prime minister is determined to see those through.”

Pressed over why Starmer did not interview Mandelson, he said: “The full process that was in place at the time was followed.

Advertisement

“You’ve heard from the prime minister yesterday when he reiterated his apology to the victims of Jeffrey Epstein for appointing Peter Mandelson.”

Starmer said on Thursday: “It was my mistake and I take responsibility in relation to it.”

Asked if the prime minister’s former chief of staff, Morgan McSweeney, was involved in interviewing Mandelson, the spokesperson said: “Im not going to comment ahead of any future releases and clearly there’s also some document which we have alluded to already which are part of the police investigation.”

The Times reported that Starmer instructed McSweeney, a personal friend to Mandelson, to ask him just three questions about his connections to Epstein.

Advertisement

McSweeney allegedly did not express any views about Mandelson’s responses.

His replies were then reportedly assessed by No.10′s then-director of communications, Matthew Doyle, who was also a personal friend to Mandelson.

Doyle reportedly said he was “satisfied” with the peer’s answers.

The government released its first tranche of documents related to the vetting around the peer’s appointment this week.

Advertisement

Some information is being withheld while Scotland Yard carries out its own probe into Mandelson over allegations of misconduct in public office.

Mandelson denies all allegations of wrongdoing.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

3 Best Table Tennis Tables To Buy In 2026: Expert Guide

Published

on

Eat your heart out, Chalamet.

With Marty Supreme hitting the big screen and London hosting the World Championships for the first time in a century, 2026 is officially the year of table tennis.

Once seen as a ‘basement sport’, it’s now having a serious renaissance thanks to Timothée Chalamet’s pencil-moustached protagonist. According to travel booking platform Bokun, Google searches for “table tennis championships” and “table tennis games near me” have increased by a whopping 5,000 percent in the past month.

But what if we want a go ourselves? As the weather improves (AT LAST) here in the UK, there’s no better time to start thinking about an exciting new addition to our garden spaces.

Advertisement

To help you avoid buying a “one-season wonder,” we asked Cornilleau – one of Europe’s leading brands for outdoor table tennis – for their best picks for every budget.

From The £125 ‘Space-Saver’ To The Pro-Grade Garden Setup

Eat your heart out, Chalamet.
Eat your heart out, Chalamet.

For anyone looking to get into table tennis seriously it has to be the Cornilleau 700X Performance Outdoor Table. It offers a consistent, competition-style bounce, while the reinforced 60 mm frame keeps play stable during faster rallies (because we can’t afford any wobbles when we’re going for gold).

Built to stay outdoors year-round, it uses weather-resistant materials and comes with a 10-year warranty (!) and long-term reparability.

For affordable family fun: Cornilleau 100X Sport Outdoor Table, £499

Durable, weather-resistant materials and safety locking points mean it can handle players of all ages.
Durable, weather-resistant materials and safety locking points mean it can handle players of all ages.

The 100X Sport Outdoor Table is perfect for families who want an easy excuse to get everyone off their devices and outside in summer. Affordable but well built, this table’s compact design, large wheels and simple folding system make it quick to set up for a game and just as easy to tuck away afterwards.

For mini games: Cornilleau Mini Indoor Table, £125

Coming to an office near you soon.
Coming to an office near you soon.

If you’re tight on space but still want to get involved, the Mini Indoor Table makes quick games easy. Compact and lightweight, it sets up in minutes and can turn a living room, office or bedroom into a temporary games zone (apologies to my co-workers in advance).

At just 15kg it is easy to move around, and with paddles and balls included, it is ready for spontaneous matches whenever you have a spare half hour.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Ministers Face “Staggeringly Expensive” Energy Bill Support Without Targeted Scheme

Published

on

Ministers Face “Staggeringly Expensive” Energy Bill Support Without More Targeted Scheme
Ministers Face “Staggeringly Expensive” Energy Bill Support Without More Targeted Scheme


4 min read

A government intervention to protect energy bills from the impact of the Iran war risks being “staggeringly expensive”, a leading economist has said.

Advertisement

Paul Johnson, a former director of the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank, said Whitehall had not carried out the necessary work to produce a more “targeted” scheme than the support made available to households in 2022 following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

Johnson, now a senior adviser at the consultancy Frontier Economics, said it means that if the Keir Starmer government decides to step in to protect household bills from rising energy prices, it will be “just very, very expensive”.

Speaking on The Rundown podcast from PoliticsHome, the leading economist said he had urged the previous Conservative government to invest “serious” money in data collection to develop a more targeted scheme, but that this work was not undertaken.

Johnson explained that a more “sensible” scheme would allow the government to provide support to those who need it most, rather than to all households.

Advertisement

Appearing alongside him on this week’s episode was Bill Esterson, Labour MP for Sefton Central and chair of the energy security and net zero committee. 

They appeared on the podcast as the US and Israel’s war with Iran continues. The conflict has had a major impact on international energy prices, largely due to disruption in the Strait of Hormuz, a vital shipping lane responsible for around 20 per cent of the world’s oil supply. 

Esterson agreed with Johnson that the “data sharing just isn’t there” to create more targeted support for energy bills, despite calls from within the industry and his committee.

Advertisement

The Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) watchdog estimated that ministers spent almost £80bn on energy support for both households and businesses in the two fiscal years after Vladimir Putin’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Earlier this week, Starmer warned that the UK is exposed to international price shocks, as it was at the onset of the Ukraine war, saying “the longer this [conflict] goes on, the more likely the potential for an impact on our economy, impact into the lives and households of everybody and every business”.

On Wednesday, Chancellor Rachel Reeves acknowledged the government may have to step in to protect energy bills, telling the Treasury select committee that “nothing is off the table”.

‘We are looking at a whole range of different scenarios,” she told MPs.

Advertisement

“One reason why any future package, if it were necessary, would be more affordable is that we are now less reliant on international energy price movements than we were before Russia invaded Ukraine, because we have invested more in homegrown, renewable energy.”

She added: “We are looking at targeted support as well as broader measures, but it is just too early to say what is needed.”

Reeves
Chancellor Rachel Reeves this week said it was “too early” to know what support will be needed to protect households from rising energy prices (Alamy)

Johnson told The Rundown that lessons from the 2022 support package, which included a £400 grant for all domestic energy customers, on how to spend the money more effectively, have not been learned.

“What was announced then [in 2022] was staggeringly expensive and staggeringly generous, and it’s partly because it held everybody’s bills down,” he said.

“It was staggeringly expensive, and the reason was that the government simply didn’t have the information that allowed them to target this in a sensible way at people who had a combination of relatively low incomes and relatively high spending on energy.

Advertisement

“And I remember saying at the time it would be worth investing a couple of billion quid, I mean serious money, in making this information available. 

“Now, as far as I’m aware, they still don’t have anything which would allow them to target, and so, therefore, if this [Iran war] does go on a long time and the prices go up really significantly, I suspect that the political pressure to keep everyone’s bills down again will be very significant. 

“And then that does become just very, very expensive, and it’s even harder now than it was four or five years ago because debt is so high.”

Esterson added: “The data sharing just isn’t there. It’s a call that all of the major retailers have made to enable the kind of action that Paul’s been outlining there. It will be very, very important. 

Advertisement

“It’s one of the recommendations we’ve made as a committee. Hopefully, the government will listen to it.”

The Labour MP added that there is “going to be the need for other policy measures” if higher energy prices last beyond the start of July, when the current Ofgem price cap expires.

  • Click here to listen to the full conversation on the latest episode of The Rundown, or search for ‘PoliticsHome’ wherever you get your podcasts.

 

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Daniel Pitt: A Canadian has showed us how powerful, policy rooted in ‘our ancient English liberty’, can be

Published

on

Daniel Pitt: A Canadian has showed us how powerful, policy rooted in 'our ancient English liberty', can be

Dr Daniel Pitt is an Honorary Fellow at the University of Buckingham. 

British politics lacks an informed discourse about our constitution and its traditions. This is unfortunate as we govern through discourse.

We even have Reform UK politicians calling themselves ‘Shadow Chancellor’ and ‘Shadow Home Secretary’, which is outright nonsense, and it also lacks constitutional morality.

Sadly, our constitutional edifice is strewn with New Labour’s carbuncles. We need the policies to make both precise incisions to drain the carbuncles and a course of antibiotics.

Advertisement

So, it was a breath of fresh air to watch Pierre Poilievre, the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada, in a video of him visiting Runnymede during his trip to Britain. The video is simply but sublimely titled ‘Our ancient English liberty’.

Poilievre’s video is powerful with imagery of place, a story of a shared common constitutional tradition, and it also provides Canadians with a sense of self that stretches across time and an ocean. The best of all, it succeeded in showing that our constitutional tradition lives and breathes whilst embedding it within the Canadian national identity.

One can nitpick about some of the details in the video, such as the claim that the Magna Carta was ‘signed’ by King John; in fact, his seal was appended to the charter.

Indeed, the Magna Carta myth has become a fundamental part of our self-image, especially during the nineteenth century, but the myth is fading away.

Advertisement

But which Magna Carta? The 1215 version had a very brief lifespan indeed, as Pope Innocent III repudiated it. The 1216 version is far more conservative than its more radical 1215 counterpart, because the radical elements were removed by Henry III’s man. It was reissued again in 1217, and the provisions in relation to the forests were put in a separate charter called The Charter of the Forest. It was again reissued in 1225.

It took until 1297 to have statutory form with the title The Great Charter of The Liberties of England, and of The Liberties of The Forest.

The charter was not about universal rights or freedom but about power politics and averting a civil war. It unintentionally, through an invisible hand, created a legal order that was established by solving specific conflicts. Of course, the charter itself was just a political solution to a political struggle.

There is chaos and contingency in actual history, yet great men and women can change it. A stateman’s narrative must be and is a much simpler one than a historian’s.

Advertisement

Statemen can be more romantic and mythologise; they can try to shape the political culture in which they operate. Their oratory should use powerful imagery to tell a national story with a swift-moving narrative that provides an interpretation of who we are and where we are going.

Yes, myth will be part of their story, our story. The best conservative orators, from both sides of the Atlantic Ocean, such as Ronald Reagan and Winston Churchill, employed these skills. It is the role of the Conservative statesmen to provide good myths, as Benjamin Disraeli knew all too well.

The reason for this is that our national identity is driven by the moral imagination of great people and their interpretations of great events.

Our national story can reveal itself in the form of myth and symbols. Myths are not necessarily falsehoods; on the contrary, they are essential truths that are packaged in a story. This style of communication is impactful because human beings are narrative-driven creatures and love a good story. This is a backwards-looking process which creates our nation’s story, which we then tell ourselves and pass on to our children and grandchildren.

Advertisement

Our civic national identity is closely connected with our sense of sharing a common tradition and a set of manners. This involves an awareness of our common history and the great continuity of this history. Both our constitution and our culture, which are mutually reinforcing, show elements of this continuity. However, we have to treat those carbuncles.

Critical events and documents, such as Magna Carta, provide us with an opportunity to renew and reclaim our national story that has a deep meaning and which makes sense to us today. Poilievre did this as easily as eating an apple. We need to learn from it.

As George Orwell indicates, “myths which are believed in tend to become true”. Why? According to Orwell, this is because we will try to live them.

These myths facilitate a bond of sympathy between us, creating a national spirit, which is unmistakable in our constitutional traditions. New Labour’s carbuncles are a repudiation of this tradition, and the Conservatives must reaffirm our impressive constitutional tradition. This idea of belonging to a historical constitutional tradition leads us to believe that we are part of a collective national identity, and that is why constitutional reform matters.

Advertisement

These national myths, including the Magna Carta myth, are a powerful way of recruiting loyalty to our constitutional tradition and to our country. The stories and myths that we tell ourselves are a product of a shared loyalty. Poilievre’s video on Magna Carta is an exemplar for us to learn from.

Wrapping up policy proposals within a grand narrative of their historical importance and situating them within a long national story has powerful imagery that can move the conservative soul.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

From Scalloped Plates To Ribbed Glassware: 11 Elegant Homeware Buys For Your 2026 Dinner Parties

Published

on

From Scalloped Plates To Ribbed Glassware: 11 Elegant Homeware Buys For Your 2026 Dinner Parties

We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI – prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.

There’s something about the ideal of being a great host that is just so uniquely appealing.

Maybe it’s the retro glamour of it all – in any decade, the idea of being an it-girl who’s got it all figured out always seems to go hand-in-hand with the ability to throw a great party.

If you’ve got the urge to boost your hosting skills, here’s everything you need to throw the dinner party of your dreams – from statement salt and pepper shakers to chic napkins and lots more.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

The House Article | Ten years shorter: the coastal inequality that Britain must confront

Published

on

Ten years shorter: the coastal inequality that Britain must confront
Ten years shorter: the coastal inequality that Britain must confront

(Mim Friday / Alamy)


3 min read

My son was born in Blackpool. As a bald fact it means he is likely to live 10 years less than a boy born in Hampshire. A decade stolen before he has even had the chance to live them. Not fate. Not chance. Policy choices.

Advertisement

Life expectancy is shaped by the decisions we take in Parliament. Decades of uneven investment have carved inequality into the lives of children in coastal towns. Unless we act with urgency, they will inherit a Britain that rewards wealth and punishes geography.

When Keir Starmer visited my by-election in May 2024, he spoke about the pride and ambition of our town and the frustration when that pride is met with neglect rather than investment. He was right. Blackpool has never lacked pride or ambition. What it has lacked is sustained commitment from those with the power to change things.

Nine of England’s 10 most deprived neighbourhoods are in coastal communities, seven being in Blackpool alone. Low wages, poor health, insecure work and deep-rooted disadvantage are not isolated problems; they are symptoms of a national economic model that has left coastal communities behind.

Advertisement

If we are serious about rebalancing Britain, we must confront the system that has historically channelled investment away from towns like ours. That is why reforms to the Treasury’s Green Book are so significant. For years, benefit-cost ratios were treated as a blunt pass-or-fail test. Projects in already prosperous areas where returns are easier to measure, scored highest. Places with entrenched deprivation, where social returns are transformative but harder to quantify, were too often marked down.

The updated guidance allows investment decisions to account properly for social impact and regional need. In simple terms, coastal towns finally get a fairer hearing.

This is not abstract policy. It means transport, housing or regeneration projects in deprived communities can be judged on their ability to reduce inequality, improve health and raise wages, not simply on short-term financial return. The framework for change is there. What matters now is the resolve to use it boldly.

Advertisement

Economic rebalancing must move from rhetoric to reality. Growth has too often been concentrated in the South while coastal towns remain trapped in cycles of seasonal, low-paid work. For Blackpool, that means attracting high-value employment with clear routes for progression. Government should lead by incentivising private investment and backing sectors such as clean energy, digital services, health innovation and our visitor economy.

Coastal communities also face distinct challenges: ageing populations, fragile local economies, housing pressures, poor connectivity and stark health inequalities. These issues cut across departments, yet responsibility in Whitehall remains fragmented. That is why the recommendation of the House of Lords for a dedicated coastal communities minister deserves serious consideration. Coastal Britain cannot remain everyone’s secondary responsibility and no one’s primary focus. A dedicated minister would provide co-ordination, accountability and a clear voice to ensure policy is coherent rather than piecemeal.

Health inequality remains the starkest injustice. The life expectancy gap between Blackpool and Hampshire is preventable. Prevention, early intervention and properly funded local health services must sit at the heart of our agenda, because without health, opportunity is hollow.

People in coastal communities are not asking for favours; they are asking for fairness, investment that reflects need, decisions that respect local knowledge and change visible in everyday life. Pride without progress becomes frustration. Ambition without delivery becomes disillusionment.

Advertisement

When Blackpool succeeds, Britain succeeds. The test before us is simple: will we use the power of government to close the gap or allow another generation, including my son, to inherit neglect measured in years they never get to live? 

Chris Webb is the Labour MP for Blackpool South

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025