Connect with us

Sports

Roy Keane makes Michael Carrick feelings clear after Wayne Rooney’s Man United demand

Published

on

Roy Keane has delivered his verdict on whether Michael Carrick should be given the permanent Manchester United head coach role after Sunday’s win against Aston Villa

Advertisement

Roy Keane has doubled down on his opinion that Michael Carrick should not be the next permanent Manchester United head coach. Carrick, 44, has done an excellent job since returning to Old Trafford on an interim basis in mid-January, winning seven and drawing one of his nine matches in charge.

It’s a run of form that has seen United move up to third in the Premier League table and put them in a strong position to secure Champions League qualification for next season. But while the Reds have enjoyed a drastic uptick in form since Carrick’s appointment, Keane does not think he is the right man to lead the club full-time.

When asked if he would appoint Carrick as United’s permanent manager in the summer, Keane said on Sky Sports: “No, I think there are better options out there.

FOLLOW OUR MAN UNITED FB PAGE! Latest news and analysis via the MEN’s Manchester United Facebook page

Advertisement

“I think the games that he has come in, he has won football matches and done a very good job. He has simplified things, but there has been no jeopardy in those games. They’ve had free weeks to prepare for those matches, it has been good timing for him, and he has done a very good job. I take my hat off to him.

“And if he does get the job in the summer, good luck to him. But I think there are far better options out there for the next manager of Man United. If Carrick had been mentioned three months ago as the next United manager you’d have been locked up. He wasn’t even in the reckoning! But with time he has got the opportunity and he has done a very good job. I just think there are better options out there.”

Meanwhile, ex-United forward Rooney shared a different opinion to Keane. Indeed, the 40-year-old told BBC 5 Live that he would give Carrick the full-time gig at the end of the season. “100 per cent he should,” Rooney responded, when asked if Carrick should be given the permanent role.

“I knew this was going happen with Michael Carrick, I know him very well, I know his character and personality,” Rooney continued. “It needed a calm head, but someone who knows the place and the players needed some love and he’s give them that. We’re seeing the players play with more quality, we’re seeing them more together as a team and they look like a very strong team.

“So, for me, why would you change? You’ve got someone come in who’s got I think the best win percentage of any Manchester United manager after that many games, so, for me, he has to get the job.”

Keane and Rooney were speaking after United further strengthened their Champions League hopes with a deserved 3-1 win against Aston Villa on Sunday. The Reds took the lead just after half-time through Casemiro but were pegged back as Villa equalised when Ross Barkley thundered a shot past Senne Lammens.

But Carrick’s side showed character and responded by going back in front as Matheus Cunha fired home before Benjamin Sesko wrapped up the win with a late strike.

Advertisement

“We can enjoy winning,” Carrick said post-match. “It’s a good feeling and something we want to keep getting used to. “We are keeping a lid on it and understanding where we are and what it takes to win games like today. We are in a good position at the moment but still a lot to play for.”

Ex-United midfielder Keane first claimed that he doesn’t think Carrick should be the club’s next permanent head coach after his second game back in January. Speaking following a 3-2 win at Arsenal, Keane praised the impact Carrick made after back-to-back wins but felt he isn’t the “right man for the job”.

“Two great performances but anyone can win two games,” Keane said at the time. If United win every game until the end of the season, I still wouldn’t be giving him the job. I still wouldn’t be convinced he’s the man for the job. Absolutely not. They need a bigger and better manager. The size of the club and the challenges they face over the next few years, you want a manager who you feel can get them winning league titles.

Advertisement

“Are we going to sit here and believe Michael Carrick can get United winning league titles? It’s not enough for me. I don’t believe he is the man to get them winning league titles.”

Next up for United is a trip to Bournemouth on Friday night. They would move six points clear of fourth-place Aston Villa, eight above Liverpool in fifth and six ahead of Chelsea in sixth with a win at the Vitality Stadium.

Get MEN Premium now for just £1 HERE – or get involved in our United WhatsApp group by clicking HERE. You can also join our United Facebook page by clicking HERE and don’t miss out on our brilliant selection of newsletters HERE.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Sports

Lionel Messi faces backlash after White House visit with Donald Trump | Football News

Published

on


Lionel Messi, widely regarded as one of the greatest soccer players of all time, has consistently avoided discussing politics publicly. However, a recent visit to the White House sparked debate in his home country of Argentina, despite Messi himself remaining silent.

 


Last week, Messi attended a reception at the White House celebrating his U.S.-based team, Inter Miami, winning the 2025 MLS Cup. The event, meant to honor the club’s achievement, quickly became politically charged when former President Donald Trump used the occasion to discuss controversial topics, including regime changes in Cuba and Iran. 
While Messi smiled politely during the proceedings, many interpreted his presence as implicit support, igniting a heated conversation back in Argentina.

 
 

Advertisement


Reactions from Argentina and beyond

 

President Javier Milei of Argentina, a known ally of Trump, praised the handshake between Messi and the former U.S. president. Critics, however, accused the soccer superstar of aligning himself with a divisive political figure. Ángel Cappa, a respected former coach and analyst, expressed his dismay in a blog post titled, “What a shame, Messi,” calling the situation “a slap in the face” to those who admired Messi’s neutrality. 

 

Advertisement


Messi has carefully maintained this stance for much of his career. Over two decades on the pitch, he has largely focused on football and philanthropy, deliberately steering clear of political controversies. Even during high-profile events like this White House visit, he refrains from commenting, leaving him vulnerable to interpretations by others.

 


Navigating politics as a sports icon

 

Advertisement


The controversy highlights the delicate position athletes often find themselves in when politics intersect with sports. Many U.S.-based teams and players have opted to skip White House visits entirely to avoid political scrutiny or the perception of endorsing a particular leader. Messi’s situation underscores how global stars can become unwitting symbols in debates they never intended to join.

 


Messi maintains focus on football

 

Advertisement


Despite the backlash, Messi continues to concentrate on his club and personal achievements. Representatives from Inter Miami did not comment on the White House incident, emphasizing that Messi’s priority remains his sport. For fans and analysts alike, the focus remains on Messi’s contributions on the field rather than off it.

 


In a world where sports and politics frequently collide, Messi’s experience serves as a reminder that even the most apolitical athletes can be drawn into controversies simply by appearing in high-profile events.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

March Madness (Home)

Published

on

March Madness (Home)

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Bangladesh Clinch ODI series Against Pakistan With Narrow 11-Run Victory

Published

on

Pakistan beat Bangladesh to win ODI series© AFP




Advertisement

Bangladesh defeated Pakistan by 11 runs in a thrilling third ODI at the Sher-e-Bangla National Stadium on Sunday, securing the three-match series 2-1. Batting first, Bangladesh posted a competitive total of 290/5 in their allotted 50 overs. The innings was anchored by a brilliant century from Tanzid Hasan Tamim, whose elegant strokeplay set the tone for the innings. Litton Das provided a steady 41, while Towhid Hridoy contributed a vital 48, ensuring Bangladesh maintained momentum through the middle overs. The partnership efforts and timely acceleration in the final overs helped Bangladesh set a challenging target for Pakistan. In reply, Pakistan showed resilience, with Salman Agha producing a fighting century to keep his team in contention. Saad Masood (38) and Shaheen Afridi (37) also added crucial runs, but the chase fell short as Bangladesh bowlers struck at critical junctures.

Taskin Ahmed led the bowling attack with composure, scalping four wickets, while Mustafizur Rahman also chipped in with three wickets, restricting Pakistan to 279 and securing a thrilling 11-run victory. Bangladesh hold their nerve to seal the series. A cracker of a game after two one-sided ones before.

Bangladesh captain Mehidy Hasan Miraz, after the match, said, “Definitely, it was an excellent match. And yes, sometimes I was also afraid, like, you know, the boys played really well in the last over, 14 runs. Everybody is afraid. (on their score) Definitely. I think it was an excellent wicket. If we could get 300, it would definitely be better. But it’s still well. We’re playing well, especially with Amim, the way he batted. And definitely, they played really, really well. And then the little dash and Shankal and Tawhid, they played really well.”

Advertisement

Topics mentioned in this article

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

NFL fans react as Dallas Goedert reaches agreement with Eagles to return for 9th season in Philly

Published

on

Dallas Goedert will remain in the City of Brotherly Love for a ninth straight season.

On Sunday, the Philadelphia Eagles were reported to have re-signed the veteran tight end to a one-year, $7-million contract:

Sources: Tight end Dallas Goedert reached agreement today on a one-year deal to return to the Eagles for his ninth season in Philadelphia.

Advertisement

Reaction to it, however, was skeptical:

Advertisement

Looking to predict NFL playoff Scenarios? Try our NFL Playoff Predictor for real-time simulations and stay ahead of the game!

@AdamSchefter This means AJ Brown is gone

@AdamSchefter They just refuse to do a rebuild

@AdamSchefter One year deal? Either Dallas Goedert isn’t confident in his future, or the Eagles don’t trust him long term.

Advertisement

@AdamSchefter Damn I was hoping he would get signed somewhere else

@AdamSchefter Ok, but I want that TE from Oregon in the draft.

@AdamSchefter ANOTHER AWFUL SIGNING FOR THE EAGLES LMAOO. NFL RECORD FOR THE WORST SIGNINGS IN FREE AGENT HISTORY LMAOO😭😭🤣🤣🤣

The move ensures some continuity for an offense that is still undecided on whether to trade away AJ Brown. The star wideout had been very vocal about wanting out of the Eagles throughout the 2025 season as he struggled under Kevin Patullo’s system.

Advertisement

Amidst all that, Goedert emerged as an unlikely scoring threat, catching a team- and career-high 11 touchdowns in 15 regular-season games. In the Eagles’ wild-card loss to the San Francisco 49ers, he became the first tight end in NFL history to rush for a touchdown in a playoff game (he also caught another).


ALSO READ: Eagles insider reveals team’s interest in $70,161,063 worth TE amid Dallas Goedert’s uncertain future in free agency

ALSO READ: “It’s time to draft his successor”: NFL fans react to Eagles GM Howie Roseman’s comment on Dallas Goedert’s future


Insider shared thoughts on what Dallas Goedert staying with Eagles would mean for AJ Brown

During a recent appearance on Anthony Gargano’s eponymous show, Mike Garafolo posited that Dallas Goedert‘s and AJ Brown’s futures in Philadelphia were “interconnected” and that they could afford to lose one or the other, but not both:

Advertisement

“They’re going to have to (make a decision), one way or another. Now, the Goedert window being moved back was not just for Goedert, that was for A.J. as well … If you lose Goedert, you take a huge cap hit. If you trade A.J., you take a huge cap hit. So there’s not going to be an A.J. trade and a Goedert release. It’s going to be one or the other.”

Later that day on the NFL Network’s The Insiders, he further explained:

“The Eagles can’t pay Goedert if they’re keeping Brown. … But I’m sure Howie’s going to continue to have conversations …about A.J. Brown over the weekend. We’ll see. He’s still an Eagle right now. Will he be? At this point, I don’t know. I’m tired of guessing. We’ll let you know.”

Brown is entering the final year of a $100-million extension that he signed in 2022 upon being traded from the Tennessee Titans. After 2026, he will begin another extension, this time lasting three seasons and costing $96 million.