Connect with us

Crypto World

How to launch your crypto exchange software in Georgia in 2026?

Published

on

AI-Powered Intelligent Document Processing

Bybit and Bitget, both amongst 10 crypto exchange software by global trading volume, entered Eastern Europe with Georgian Virtual Asset Service Provider registration in 2025. That wasn’t random but strategic.

Since then, Bybit has treated Georgia as a launchpad, not a checkbox jurisdiction. The rollouts have been deliberate and aggressive:

  • Bybit Georgia with one-click crypto purchases
  • A crypto card launch in January 2026, bridging spending and trading
  • Upcoming neobank features, including IBAN accounts expected in February

This is not how cryptocurrency exchanges behave in unstable and speculative markets. This behavior reflects predictable regulations, workable banking access, and long-run expansion economics make sense.

Georgia fits that profile.

If you’re any of those planning your cryptocurrency exchange development for launch in Georgia:

Advertisement
  • Entrepreneurs building long-term exchange businesses
  • Stock exchanges evaluating crypto and tokenized assets
  • Brokerage firms expanding into digital markets
  • Fintechs launching regulated trading infrastructure

This guide is for you.

Why is Georgia Quietly Becoming a Crypto Exchange Software Base?

Until 2023, cryptocurrency exchanges in Georgia operated in a grey, lightly supervised environment, but not anymore.

    • The National Bank of Georgia (NBG) now regulates crypto under a defined VASP framework.
    • Exchanges register instead of negotiating regulatory uncertainty.
    • AML and KYC are enforced proportionally, aligned with FATF guidance.
    • Entry and compliance costs remain far lower than in the EU, UK, or US.

To date, Georgia is officially legally clear for operators and investable for institutions that can’t touch unregulated markets.

  • Small Population, Outsized Impact

With over 3.7 million people, Georgia ranks among the top three countries in the 2025 Chainanalysis Global Crypto Adoption Index (population-adjusted). And even more important than ownership is Georgian behavior, as testified by various recent research.

    • Eastern Europe remains underbanked but crypto-active.
    • Retail traders actively move between spot trading, wallets, and DeFi protocols
    • On-chain usage remains strong relative to population size.
    • Regular use of crypto beyond speculation
    • Users are comfortable with self-custody, stablecoins, and cross-platform movement.

This creates a real user base that understands trading mechanics, adopts new financial tools quickly, and does not require heavy education to onboard. All of this also reduces friction at the launch of the crypto exchange software.

  • Favorable For Operators & Traders

Georgia’s crypto appeal is not driven by retail hype but operational hype. 

    • 0% capital gains tax for individual crypto holders
    • VAT exemption on crypto transactions
    • Crypto exchanges can scale operations without an early tax drag. They don’t pay tax when they earn profit or reinvest it, but when they pay dividends, 5% tax applies. 
    • Affordable licensing and entity setup
    • No political or regulatory hostility toward crypto businesses

For exchange founders, this directly impacts:

    • User acquisition efficiency
    • Market maker participation
    • High-frequency and professional trading activity
    • Long-term retention of active users

It also creates a clear path for stock exchanges and brokerages to introduce regulated crypto trading, tokenized assets, and hybrid digital markets. 

  • Remittances and Stablecoin Effect 

One of the strongest drivers of crypto usage in Georgia is remittances.

    • Georgia receives over $2 billion annually in cross-border remittances.
    • Major remittance corridors for Georgia include the US, Russia, and Turkey.
    • Traditional remittance fees often range between 7-10%.

Stablecoins, primarily USDT and USDC, offer a cheaper and faster alternative to traditional remittance systems, and users in Georgia already understand fiat-pegged crypto assets. Those seeking a cryptocurrency exchange software development company must build with those who can implement fiat on/off ramps along with P2P rails within crypto exchanges. 

  • Mining Legacy and Infrastructure Advantage

For years, Georgia was an active mining hub due to low energy costs and early openness to crypto operations. While large-scale mining has since normalized globally, its impact on local adoption patterns remains.

    • Georgia’s crypto adoption did not begin with trading apps. It began with infrastructure. In markets without a mining or infrastructure phase, crypto usually enters as a price chart, meme, or quick-profit instrument. In Georgia, crypto entered earlier as hardware, energy economics, wallets, custody, long-term holding, and not as a speculative instrument. That changes user psychology.
    • Mining-heavy ecosystems produce wallet-native users and not just app-only users who are comfortable with private keys and custody. They have a higher tolerance for advanced products such as derivatives, tokenized assets, on-chain settlement mechanisms, etc. So, it ultimately lowers onboarding friction and education costs for those planning advanced cryptocurrency exchange development.

For cryptocurrency exchange software operators planning an initial launch, Georgia becomes a launchpad that enables:

    • Liquidity bootstrapping with high-intent users
    • Active, stablecoin-heavy order books
    • Early adoption of new products such as derivatives, tokenized assets, yield products, etc.  

Georgia vs “Popular” Crypto Jurisdictions

Jurisdiction Regulatory Clarity Tax Burden Cost to Launch Institutional Viability
EU (MiCA) High High Very High Strong, slow
USA Fragmented High Very High Legally risky
UAE High Medium High Strong
Offshore hubs Low Low Low Weak
Georgia High Low Low Strong

Regulatory Framework for Crypto Exchange Software in Georgia

Georgia’s crypto regulation doesn’t live in assumptions or interpretations but is driven by processes, filings, and enforcement. This section breaks down how the Georgian crypto exchange registration regime works in practice.

1. Who Regulates Crypto Exchange Software in Georgia?

As stated above, crypto exchange operators in Georgia have been regulated by the National Bank of Georgia (NBG) under the Law on the Registration of VASP since July 1, 2023. The Georgian Lari remains the only legal currency. However, crypto trading, custody and exchange operations are explicitly regulated under the VASP framework.

The National Bank of Georgia (NBG) does not operate like a product gatekeeper. It does not:

  • Approve or reject individual tokens
  • Certify each trading pair
  • Review every new crypto product before launch

Instead, it regulates the cryptocurrency exchange software operator, not each asset. It only evaluates whether a VASP:

  • Has proper AML/KYC controls
  • Can monitor and report suspicious activity
  • Has governance, risk, and operational controls in place
  • Can prevent market abuse, fraud, and illicit finance

Once a VASP is registered, the responsibility for what it lists lies with the exchange, not with NBG, provided it stays within the regulatory boundaries.

2. Who Must Register as a VASP?

Any entity providing crypto-related financial services from or within Georgia must register as a VASP with the NBG.

Advertisement

This includes, but is not limited to:

  • Centralized crypto exchanges: Platforms facilitating spot, derivatives, or margin trading
  • Custodial wallet providers: Services holding private keys or assets on behalf of users
  • Crypto/fiat service providers: Fiat on-ramps, off-ramps, and settlement platforms
  • OTC desks and brokerage-style platforms: Particularly relevant for institutions, high-net-worth clients, and mining firms

For stock exchanges and brokerages planning cryptocurrency exchange development, this means operations cannot be treated as a side or unregulated activity. If digital assets are offered, VASP registration becomes mandatory.

3. VASP Registration Requirements

Georgia’s VASP registration is documentation-driven and process-oriented.

A. Corporate Structure & Disclosures

Crypto exchange software applicants must submit:

Advertisement
  • Legal entity details (Georgian incorporation or registered branch)
  • Ownership structure and ultimate beneficial owners (UBOs)
  • Business model description (products, markets, target users)
  • Operational flow of funds and assets

B. AML / KYC Systems

VASP applicants applying for their wallet or crypto exchange development projects must demonstrate:

  • Risk-based customer onboarding procedures
  • Identity verification aligned with FATF guidance
  • Transaction monitoring systems
  • Suspicious activity reporting workflows
  • Sanctions screening and record retention

Georgia does not allow anonymous or privacy-focused assets that prevent traceability. Exchanges must be able to explain how illicit activity is detected and mitigated.

C. “Fit and Proper” Management Checks

Key personnel among crypto exchange software operators are assessed for:

  • Professional competence
  • Relevant financial or compliance experience
  • Clean legal and regulatory history

This applies to directors, senior management, and compliance officers

D. Reporting & Ongoing Obligations

Advertisement

Registered VASPs are required to:

  • Maintain transaction and customer records
  • Submit periodic activity and volume reports
  • Cooperate with regulatory inspections
  • Notify the NBG of material changes (ownership, services, governance)

Non-compliance can result in financial penalties, operational suspension, and deregistration as a VASP

E. Costs Associated With Georgian Cryptocurrency Exchange Software Registration

The State registration fee is approximately 1,500 GEL, and there are no excessive capital lock-up requirements. This keeps Georgia accessible for:

  • Startups with serious intent
  • Regional exchanges
  • Stock exchanges that are testing digital asset markets
  • Fintechs expanding into crypto trading

Step-by-Step: How to Launch a Crypto Exchange Software in Georgia in 2026 

1. Define the Business Model & Jurisdictional Structuring

Before the incorporation of their crypto exchange software or licensing, founders must lock in three decisions:

  • Target users (retail, institutional, remittance, regional)
  • Asset focus (crypto-only, stablecoins, tokenized assets)
  • Operating footprint (Georgia-only vs regional hub)

Those planning their crypto exchange development must learn that Georgia works best when treated as a safe gateway into Eastern Europe and a regulated operating base, and not as a domestic market or loophole jurisdiction.

Also, when you’re deciding on cryptocurrency exchange software models, you must not clone any existing random exchange. The best way is to pick models that regulators and banking environments support.

Advertisement

Top Cryptocurrency Exchange Software Development Models For Launch in Georgia Include:

A. Centralized Exchanges: Best suited for crypto exchange software development projects building fiat on/off ramps, compliance-heavy trading environments, or those targeting institutional and professional traders.

Why this works in Georgia:

  • Georgian banks are most compatible with custodial structures.
  • Easier alignment with AML and reporting expectations under the National Bank of Georgia.
  • Market makers prefer centralized custody and execution predictability.

For stock exchanges or brokerages entering crypto, a centralized exchange development model is quite low-friction. 

B. Hybrid Custody Exchange: Hybrid custody crypto exchange development combines centralized order books and matching engines with self-custodial as well as centralized wallets. 

Advertisement

Why this fits Georgia well:

  • Compliance remains centralized and auditable
  • Custody models can evolve gradually
  • Supports future expansion into tokenized assets

Georgian stock exchanges and financial institutions extending existing infrastructures without abandoning established governance models can leverage such models.

C. Niche Exchanges: Those planning a domestic cryptocurrency exchange software development must not build retail-focussed platforms but can go for focused niches including:

  • Stablecoin-focused remittance exchanges (USDT/USDC corridors)
  • Mining-community and professional trading 
  • Regional liquidity hubs serving Eastern Europe and CIS markets

2. Entity Setup in Georgia and VASP registration

Once the cryptocurrency exchange software model is finalized, it’s time to:

  • Incorporate a Georgian legal entity or register a branch
  • Define ownership and beneficial controllers
  • Appoint directors and compliance officers aligned with VASP requirements

A cryptocurrency exchange software development company can help structure an entity based on:

  • The exchange model selected above
  • Future product scope (derivatives, tokenized assets, custody)

After setting up the entity, all crypto exchange software must register as VASPs.

3. Crypto Exchange Software Development

Collaborate with your cryptocurrency exchange software development company to bring these essential components together and weave them with compliance and security.

  • High-performance matching engine and order management
  • Wallet and custody infrastructure (hot/cold segregation)
  • User accounts, balances, and permissions
  • Admin and compliance dashboards
  • APIs for liquidity providers and market makers

Now, since businesses need to build for the Georgian market, they need to devise the right fiat and banking settlement strategy to establish a workable fiat on/off ramp. They must have clear custodial structures, transparent fund flow documentation, and strong AML alignment for compliance with Georgian banks.

Also, cryptocurrency exchange software development won’t work in 2026 and beyond until it aligns with top Georgian digital asset trends. Modern platforms are expected to support:

Advertisement
  • Tokenized asset readiness, including tokenized stocks, bonds, and commodities, with clear separation between primary issuance workflows and secondary market trading, ownership traceability, transfer controls, and secondary-market structures suitable for institutional participation rather than unrestricted retail issuance.
  • Stablecoin-centric market design, where USDT and USDC function as core base pairs, enabling fiat-light settlement flows, efficient cross-border remittance use cases, and treasury, margin, and liquidity management denominated primarily in stablecoins.
  • Embedded, institutional-grade compliance technology, covering real-time transaction monitoring, on-chain analytics and risk scoring, automated regulatory and activity reporting, and rule-based alerts with full audit trails to meet ongoing supervision expectations under the NBG.

4. Security and Liquidity:

Strong cryptocurrency exchange development liquidity directly impacts regulator confidence, banking relationships, and institutional adoption. So, crypto trading platforms must implement the following security essentials:

  • Hot and cold wallet segregation
  • Key management and access controls
  • Custody auditability
  • Incident response procedures

Also, for initiating trading instantly, crypto exchange software solutions need to plan liquidity mechanisms that align with the exchange model, target users, and asset scope. Georgia-based cryptocurrency exchanges typically rely on:

  • Professional market makers
  • Liquidity aggregation APIs
  • Stablecoin-denominated order books
  • OTC partnerships for large trades

5. Go-live, Audits & Scaling

Before the public launch, operators must collaborate with a cryptocurrency exchange software development company to:

  • Conduct internal and third-party audits
  • Test compliance reporting workflows
  • Validate banking and settlement flows

Post-launch, they can scale on the following:

  • Regional expansion
  • New asset classes
  • Tokenized markets
  • Institutional partnerships

Final Takeaway

Georgia’s VASP regime is designed to filter out anonymous operators, compliance-averse exchanges and regulatory arbitrage plays. It also supports predictable licensing timelines, banking relationships, institutional participation, and expansion into tokenized assets and regulated crypto products.

If you’re serious about launching a regulated crypto exchange in Georgia, Antier offers custom and compliance-ready white label cryptocurrency exchange infrastructure that regulators approve and that users trust.

Share your project requirements today!

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Nomura pushes back on crypto retreat concerns as it tightens risk controls

Published

on

Nomura pushes back on crypto retreat concerns as it tightens risk controls

Nomura Holdings pushed back against suggestions it is losing confidence in crypto, saying tighter risk controls at its Laser Digital unit are designed to limit short-term earning swings while it focuses on longer-term strategies, the bank told CoinDesk in emailed comments on Wednesday.

“Given the nature of the crypto-asset business, we recognize that a certain level of earnings volatility is inherent, and we recognize the importance of taking a medium- to long-term perspective,” the bank said. “At the same time, to limit short-term earnings swings, we have further tightened position and risk limits. We will continue to capture growth opportunities in the crypto market while strengthening our services and customer base.”

The clarification follows comments from Nomura’s chief financial officer, Hiroyuki Moriuchi, who said during an earnings briefing that the firm introduced “stricter position management” at Laser Digital to reduce risk exposure and limit earnings swings driven by crypto market volatility. Losses at the unit contributed to a 9.7% decline in Nomura’s fiscal third-quarter profit.

The bank’s strategy shift comes as the crypto market is hit by a steep decline with total value slumping by nearly half a trillion since Jan. 29, according to CoinGecko data. Bitcoin tumbled to its lowest level since President Donald Trump won re-election in early November 2024 on Tuesday, hitting a low of $72,870 although it later bounced back to over $76,000, according to CoinDesk data.

Advertisement

Nomura’s decision follows the Oct. 10 flash crash, which wiped out more than $19 billion in leveraged positions just days after bitcoin hit a record high above $126,200. Bitcoin ended the year around $87,000, roughly 31% below its peak, while total crypto market capitalization also fell over 30% to just over $3 trillion.

Nomura denied the decision means it has lost faith in the sector. “Laser Digital’s risk controls performed as designed: exposure was reduced early, losses were contained, and the firm avoided the more severe impacts felt worldwide,” it said.

The banking firm, considered Japan’s largest investment bank, with $673 billion in assets under management as of late last year, acknowledged that volatility is an unavoidable feature of the crypto business.

“By nature of the digital asset business, Laser Digital and other industry peers have beta exposure to the market,” the bank told CoinDesk. “However, risk taking at Laser Digital is at Trad-Fi institutional grade, and Q3 performance is not representative of any fundamental weakness.”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto networks respond after Vitalik Buterin told them they ‘no longer makes sense’ for Ethereum

Published

on

(Base TVL Feb 2026 / DefiLlama)

For years, Ethereum’s layer-2 networks have marketed themselves as extensions of Ethereum itself. “Arbitrum is Ethereum,” Offchain Labs co-founder Steven Goldfeder wrote on X in March 2024. “Base is Ethereum,” Coinbase’s layer-2 team posted in April 2025.

But following recent comments from Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin questioning whether Ethereum still needs a dedicated layer-2 roadmap, many of those same teams are now emphasizing something different: that rollups are not Ethereum at all.

Goldfeder, for one, struck a noticeably different tone after Buterin’s post, writing on X instead: “Arbitrum is not Ethereum.”

“It’s a core part of the ecosystem, a close-knit ally, and has enjoyed a symbiotic relationship for the last half-decade. But it is not Ethereum,” he added in the post.

Advertisement

Buterin’s remarks, which suggested that as Ethereum becomes faster and cheaper, the original rationale for layer-2s may be shifting, reignited debate over whether rollups will become less necessary as the base layer improves.

Layer-2 networks were previously incorporated into Ethereum’s roadmap to scale the network by processing transactions off the main blockchain and settling them back to Ethereum, helping reduce congestion and fees.

The debate is not abstract. Several layer-2 networks now secure billions of dollars in user funds, making them some of the largest platforms in crypto. Coinbase-backed Base holds roughly $4 billion in total value locked, while Arbitrum secures more than $2 billion, according to DefiLlama data.

(Base TVL Feb 2026 / DefiLlama)

(Base TVL Feb 2026 / DefiLlama)
Advertisement

‘Less relevant’

But leaders across the layer-2 ecosystem say this moment is being misunderstood.

Rather than signaling an existential threat, they argue, Ethereum’s progress is forcing rollups to clarify their purpose and to stand on their own.

Ben Fisch of the Espresso Foundation said Buterin’s comments reflect a logical evolution in how Ethereum’s scaling strategy is being framed.

“I think that Vitalik’s post is very consistent with that idea now that he’s saying, ‘The whole purpose of layer-2s in the first place was to scale Ethereum. Well, now we’re making Ethereum faster so they’re becoming less relevant,” Fisch said to CoinDesk in an interview.

Advertisement

Still, Fisch rejected the idea that this makes rollups obsolete.

“I think it’s the start of layer-2s flourishing and becoming independent from Ethereum,” he said.

“A layer-2 may use Ethereum as a service, but it by no means is beholden to Ethereum or what the leaders of Ethereum think.”

That perspective is increasingly echoed by layer-2 leaders themselves.

Advertisement

Base, Coinbase’s layer-2 network, welcomed improvements at the base layer, with Jesse Pollak, the head of Base, calling Ethereum scaling “a win for the entire ecosystem,” while stressing that rollups will need to offer more than lower fees.

“Going forward, L2s can’t just be ‘Ethereum but cheaper,’” Pollak said.

Polygon CEO Marc Boiron made a similar argument. Polygon recently said it would pivot its efforts to focus primarily on payments, and Boiron said Buterin’s comments were less about abandoning rollups than about raising expectations for them.

“Vitalik’s point was not that rollups are a mistake, but that scaling alone is insufficient,” Boiron told CoinDesk. “The real challenge is building a unique blockspace that works for real-world use cases like payments, where cost, reliability, and consistency matter.”

Advertisement

Others have gone further, arguing that rollups should be understood as independent platforms rather than extensions of Ethereum itself. Jing Wang, co-founder of the Optimism Foundation and CEO of OP Labs, compared layer-2s to standalone web services.

“L2s are websites. Every company will have its own, tailored to its needs. Ethereum is an open settlement standard,” Wang said to CoinDesk. “It’s important for Ethereum to stay true to those base layer values to give L2s the flexibility to customize.”

Taken together, the reactions suggest that while Buterin’s post has raised questions about the role of layer-2s, leaders across the ecosystem see it less as a threat than as a transition, one that is forcing rollups to reconcile how they’ve branded themselves with what they are now trying to become.

Read more: ‘You are not scaling Ethereum’: Vitalik Buterin issues a blunt reality check to the biggest crypto networks

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Solana Price Could Fall to $65 as Unstaking Surges 150%

Published

on

Staking Collapses

The Solana price remains under heavy pressure in early February, with the token down nearly 30% over the past 30 days and trading inside a weakening descending channel. Price continues to grind toward the lower boundary of this structure as long-term conviction fades.

At the same time, net staking activity has collapsed, exchange buying has slowed, and short-term traders are building positions again. Together, these signals suggest that more SOL is becoming available for potential selling just as technical support weakens.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Advertisement

Staking Collapse Meets Descending Channel Breakdown Risk

Solana’s latest weakness is being reinforced by a sharp drop in staking activity. The Solana staking difference metric tracks the weekly net change in SOL locked in native staking accounts. Positive values show new staking, while negative readings indicate net unstaking.

In late November, long-term conviction was strong. During the week ending November 24, staking accounts recorded net inflows of over 6.34 million SOL, marking a major accumulation phase.

That trend has now fully reversed. By mid-January, weekly staking flows had turned negative. The week ending January 19 showed net unstaking of around –449,819 SOL. By February 2, this had worsened to –1,155,788 SOL, a surge of roughly 150% in unstaking within two weeks.

Staking Collapses
Staking Collapses: Dune

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

This means a growing amount of SOL is being unlocked from staking and returned to liquid circulation. Once unstaked, these tokens can be moved to exchanges and sold immediately, increasing downside risk.

Advertisement

This collapse is happening as price trades near the lower edge of its descending channel with a 30% breakdown possibility in play.

Bearish SOL Price Structure
Bearish SOL Price Structure: TradingView

Sponsored

Sponsored

With SOL hovering near $96, the combination of technical weakness and rising liquid supply creates a dangerous setup. If selling accelerates, the channel support may not hold.

Exchange Buying Slows as Speculators Increase Exposure

Falling staking activity is now being reflected in exchange flows. Exchange Net Position Change tracks how much SOL moves onto or off exchanges over a rolling 30-day period. Negative values indicate net outflows and accumulation, while rising readings signal slowing demand.

Advertisement

On February 1, this metric stood near –2.25 million SOL, showing strong buying pressure. By February 3, it had weakened to around –1.66 million SOL. In just two days, exchange outflows dropped by nearly 26%, signaling that accumulation has slowed.

Exchange Outflow Slows Down
Exchange Outflow Slows Down: Glassnode

Sponsored

Sponsored

This decline in buying is occurring as unstaking accelerates, increasing the amount of SOL available for trading. When supply rises while demand weakens, the price becomes more vulnerable to sharp declines.

At the same time, speculative activity is rising.

Advertisement

HODL Waves data, which separates wallets based on holding time, shows that the one-day to one-week cohort increased its share from 3.51% to 5.06% between February 2 and February 3. This group represents short-term Solana holders who typically enter during volatility and exit quickly.

Speculative Cohort Buys
Speculative Cohort Buys: Glassnode

Similar behavior appeared in late January. On January 27, this cohort held 5.26% of the supply when SOL traded near $127. By January 30, their share dropped to 4.31% as the price fell to $117, a decline of nearly 8%.

This pattern suggests that speculative money is positioning for short-term bounces rather than long-term holding, increasing the risk that bounces will fade.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Advertisement

Key Solana Price Levels Still Point to $65 Risk

Technical structure continues to mirror the weakness seen in on-chain data. SOL remains locked inside a descending channel that has guided price lower since November. After losing the critical $98 support zone, the price is now trading near $96, close to the channel’s lower boundary.

If this support fails, the next major downside target lies near $67, based on Fibonacci projections. A deeper move could extend toward $65, aligning with the full measured 30% breakdown of the channel.

On the upside, recovery remains difficult. The first level that Solana must reclaim is $98, followed by stronger resistance near $117, which capped multiple rallies in January. A sustained move above $117 would be required to neutralize the bearish structure.

Solana Price Analysis
Solana Price Analysis: TradingView

Until then, downside risks remain elevated.

With staking collapsing, exchange buying weakening, and speculative positioning rising, more SOL is entering circulation just as technical support weakens. Unless long-term accumulation returns, Solana remains vulnerable to a deeper correction toward $65.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Lawsuits are piling up against Binance over Oct. 10

Published

on

Lawsuits are piling up against Binance over Oct. 10

Social media sentiment continues to turn against Binance for its alleged role in crypto liquidations on October 10.

Immediately after October 10, traders were already threatening legal action. However, this year, new lawsuits and arbitrations look to be underway, along with numerous other complaints and legal setbacks.

A simple chart of crypto asset prices illustrates the reason for the dogpile of complaints against Binance.

Following months of clear correlation with broad indices like the S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100, crypto decoupled precisely on October 10 — and has trended downward ever since.

Advertisement
Total crypto market capitalization vs. S&P 500 and Nasdaq 100. Source: TradingView

Read more: Binance’s $1B BTC buy fails to win back trust after Oct. 10

October 10 auto-deLeveraging

As the world’s largest crypto exchange, Binance had a unique role to play in October 10.

For example, flash-crash prices as low as 99.9% existed only on the exchange on that date, and it had just changed its pricing feeds and treatment of a major stablecoin, Ethena USDE.

Wintermute CEO Evgeny Gaevoy called Binance’s Auto-DeLeveraging prices “very strange,”  while Ark Invest’s Cathie Wood blamed billions in crypto liquidations on a Binance “software glitch.”

A post with millions of impressions also called out errors in Binance’s pricing oracles for cross-margin unified accounts.

Advertisement

Ethena USDE played a particularly important role in Binance’s October 10 liquidations. After crashing to less than $0.67 on Binance, USDE has regained its $1 peg but has shed more than half its market capitalization since 10/10.

Binance attempts to restore confidence

Without admitting to responsibility, Binance nonetheless quickly — and voluntarily — agreed to pay huge sums of money to customers that suffered losses on that date.

Advertisement

Shortly after the event, Binance announced $328 million in compensation plus another $400 million worth of loans and vouchers.

In another attempt restore confidence amid the bearish knock-on effects of October 10, Binance announced in late January 2026 that it would use its entire $1 billion SAFU (Secure Asset Fund for Users) emergency reserve to buy bitcoin (BTC) over a 30-day period.

It has not helped much. The giant BTC buy failed to win back its fans-turned-critics, with negative topics about Binance still trending on social media on a nearly daily basis.

As pressure continues to build over the exchange’s role in the historic liquidation event, founder Changpeng Zhao has blamed fake social media and unrelated bitcoin traders for bearishness.

Advertisement

He also attempted to divert blame from Binance onto Donald Trump for the crash, saying, “It’s pretty clear that the tariff announcements preceded the crash, not Binance system issues or Binance doing anything.”

Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Wall Street giant CME Group is eyeing its own ‘CME Coin,’ CEO says

Published

on

Wall Street giant CME Group is eyeing its own 'CME Coin,' CEO says

CME Group CEO Terry Duffy has suggested the derivatives giant is exploring launching its own cryptocurrency.

In response to a question from Morgan Stanley’s Michael Cyprys during the company’s latest earnings call, Duffy confirmed the firm is exploring “initiatives with our own coin that we could potentially put on a decentralized network.”

The comment was brief and came in response to a question about the role of tokenized collateral. In response, Duffy first noted that the world’s largest derivatives exchange is carefully reviewing different forms of margin.

“So if you were to give me a token from a systemically important financial institution, I would probably be more comfortable than maybe a third or fourth-tier bank trying to issue a token for margin,” Duffy said. “Not only are we looking at tokenized cash, we’re looking at different initiatives with our own coin.”

Advertisement

The company is already working on a “tokenized cash” solution with Google that’s set to come out later this year and will involve a depository bank facilitating transactions. The “own coin” Duffy referenced appears to be a different token that the firm could “potentially put on a decentralized network for other of our industry participants to use.”

The CME declined to clarify whether this “coin” would function as a stablecoin, settlement token or something else entirely when asked by CoinDesk.

However, if such an initiative goes through, the implications are significant.

While CME Group has previously flagged tokenization as a general area of interest, CEO Terry Duffy’s comments this week mark the first time the exchange has explicitly floated the concept of a proprietary, CME-issued asset running on a decentralized network.

Advertisement

The firm is set to launch 24/7 trading for all crypto futures in the second quarter of the year, and is also set to soon offer cardano, chainlink and stellar futures contracts.

CME’s average daily crypto trading volume hit $12 billion last year, with its micro-ether and micro-bitcoin futures contracts being top performers.

The launch wouldn’t make CME the first traditional finance giant to launch its own token. JPMorgan has recently rolled out tokenized deposits on Coinbase’s layer-2 blockchain Base via its so-called JPM Coin (JPMD), quietly rewiring how Wall Street moves money.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitnomial Lists First US-regulated Tezos Futures

Published

on

XRP, Derivatives, Tezos, Bitcoin Futures, Cardano, Futures

The Chicago-based cryptocurrency exchange Bitnomial has launched futures tied to Tezos’s XTZ token, marking the first time the asset has a futures market on a US Commodity Futures Trading Commission-regulated exchange.

According to Wednesday’s announcement, the futures contracts are live and allow institutional and retail traders to gain exposure to XTZ (XTZ) price movements using either cryptocurrency or US dollars as margin.

Futures contracts let traders hedge risk or gain price exposure by agreeing to buy or sell an asset at a set price on a future date, without holding the asset itself.

Regulated futures markets are often viewed as a prerequisite for broader institutional participation in the US, including potential spot exchange-traded funds (ETFs), because they provide standardized price discovery and oversight under the CFTC.

Advertisement