The historic French hi-fi manufacturer Cabasse has entered receivership after more than 75 years in the audio industry, raising serious questions about the future of one of Europe’s most recognizable loudspeaker brands. Known for its spherical speaker designs and deep roots in French acoustic engineering, Cabasse helped shape the sound of high-end audio for generations of listeners. Now the company faces a critical restructuring process that will determine whether the iconic brand can survive.

Cabasse is hardly the only high-end audio brand to run into financial trouble as the industry shifts beneath its feet. Over the past few years, companies such as MQA, Krell Industries, Auralic, and MBL Akustikgeräte have all faced their own versions of financial turbulence as the hi-fi market continues to evolve. To its credit, Cabasse saw some of the writing on the wall years ago and began leaning heavily into wireless and connected speaker systems, while continuing to push the distinctive spherical designs that have long set the brand apart.

But the broader reality is difficult to ignore: there are simply too many brands competing for attention, and a growing number of younger listeners are choosing headphones, earbuds, and more affordable compact bookshelf speakers over the large, traditional loudspeaker systems that once defined the high-end category.

Who Is Cabasse?

Founded in 1950 by Georges Cabasse, the French company quickly established itself as one of Europe’s most technically ambitious loudspeaker manufacturers. Cabasse’s goal from the beginning was straightforward but demanding: reproduce music as faithfully as possible without coloration or distortion. That philosophy pushed the company to invest heavily in acoustic research and eventually led to its development of coaxial driver technology, aligning multiple drivers on a single axis so sound radiates from a single point source.

Cabasse’s engineering work extended well beyond home hi-fi. By the early 1950s the company was already supplying sound systems to French cinemas and large venues, and over the following decades it built loudspeakers for studios, theaters, and broadcast environments while continuing to refine its consumer loudspeaker designs. Innovation remained a defining trait of the brand, with Cabasse introducing active loudspeakers as early as the late 1950s and continuing to refine its coaxial and multi-driver technologies through the 1970s, 1980s, and 1990s.

One of Cabasse’s most recognizable achievements came with the development of its SCS (Spatially Coherent System)approach to driver integration, designed to improve phase alignment and create a more realistic soundstage. That engineering philosophy ultimately led to the creation of La Sphère, one of the most visually distinctive loudspeakers in high-end audio and a product that reinforced Cabasse’s reputation for pushing the limits of loudspeaker design.

More recently, Cabasse has tried to balance its traditional hi-fi engineering with the realities of modern listening habits. Products like the Cabasse Rialto wireless bookshelf system and the Cabasse Pearl Theatre immersive home theater platform demonstrate the company’s push toward connected audio and streaming-focused systems. At the same time, statement products such as La Sphère Evo continue to showcase the company’s commitment to ambitious acoustic engineering, combining Cabasse’s quad-coaxial driver technology with modern DSP processing and extremely high power amplification.

After more than seven decades of loudspeaker innovation, Cabasse remains one of the most recognizable names in French hi-fi, known for its distinctive spherical designs and engineering-driven approach to sound reproduction. What happens next will determine whether that legacy continues.

Cabasse Enters Receivership

French luxury hi-fi manufacturer Cabasse has been placed into receivership by the Montpellier Commercial Court, effective March 9, 2026. The proceedings follow the company’s own filing on February 27, 2026, after it declared a cessation of payments.

As one of France’s oldest and most respected audio brands, Cabasse has reportedly been struggling with falling revenues and mounting debts. Trading of Cabasse shares on Euronext Growth Paris was suspended on February 27 and resumed on March 13, 2026.

The company was acquired by Canon Inc. in 2006. In 2014, French group AwoX acquired Cabasse from Canon for €4.5 million with a strategy focused on luxury wireless audio and returning high-end speaker production to France.

AwoX, which was renamed VEOM Group in 2020, has now also filed for judicial reorganisation. VEOM Group, which also owns the Chacon and DiO home automation brands, said its financial situation deteriorated and was “exacerbated by the difficulties of its subsidiary Cabasse.”

In a statement, the company said the court-supervised process is intended to examine “solutions that could ensure the sustainability of the business, preserve jobs, and address outstanding liabilities, while also launching a search for investors through either a recovery plan or a potential divestment.”

The Bottom Line

The receivership process gives Cabasse time to stabilize operations while court administrators search for investors or potential buyers. Parent company VEOM Group, which also owns the Chacon and DiO smart-home brands, has entered judicial reorganisation as well after its financial position deteriorated alongside Cabasse’s struggles. Cabasse represented roughly 29% of VEOM’s revenue in 2025, and when internal engineering and development work are included, the brand accounted for close to half of the group’s overall activity.

What happens next will likely come down to one of two outcomes: new investors recapitalize the company and keep the brand operating, or Cabasse’s assets and technology are acquired by another audio or technology group.

For consumers, the immediate impact may be uncertainty around long-term support for existing products, including warranty service, replacement parts, and software updates for the company’s connected speaker systems. If new ownership emerges, Cabasse could continue developing its distinctive coaxial-driver loudspeakers and wireless platforms. If not, another historic European hi-fi brand may end up folded into a larger group as consolidation continues across the audio industry.

Related Reading:

from the forfeiting-the-future dept

It has long been clear: Trump needs to be removed from office before he can inflict even more damage than he already has. But he doesn’t just need to be stopped; for America to have a future he also needs to be repudiated. Impeachment speaks to each need, to both make clear his behavior is beyond anything we would ever tolerate as well as remove his capacity to continue it.

But by not even attempting to impeach him, or any of his malign administration officials, he not only remains able to wreak more destruction but he now does it with Congress’s blessing. Instead of being repudiated, his behavior is endorsed. Because one could fairly conclude that if anyone in Congress had an issue with what Trump is doing, then surely they would try to do something to stop it with the power they have. Yet, with the so far sole exception of Representative Green, who has actually tried, twice, to file impeachment articles against Trump, no one—from any party—has filed any against anyone.

Obviously many in Congress do in fact object to what Trump does—there are tweets and speeches saying as much. But it’s all sound and fury signifying nothing. Tweets and speeches do not amount to any sort of useful action. And through inaction the only message we’re sending is that no one thinks it is worth doing anything more.

A stunned and increasingly wounded world is now coming to terms with the realization that Trump’s disqualifying misbehavior is the sort of thing can happen in America, and moreover, the sort of thing that will be allowed to happen in America. His abuse of power—as well as his warmongering, war criming, corruption, ignorance, incompetence, racism, and range of other unconstitutional, illegal, and even criminal activities—is apparently something not just possible under our constitutional order but enabled. As we watch an addled monster drive us all towards disaster, with the rest of the U.S. government willingly along for the ride and no one with the constitutional authority even trying to apply the brakes, one is left to conclude that, at best, our vaunted Constitution must not provide an effective immune system to address Trump’s antidemocratic malfeasance, or, worse, that Americans are fine with all of it, because, even if there were a mechanism to stop him, there’s apparently no one with the authority to trigger it who thinks it’s worth bothering with. Both conclusions paint a very different picture of what sort of country the United States is than most had previously imagined, and it is this re-envisioning of America that will affect how others let the country and its people live in the wider world even after Trump is finally gone.

Of course, there is actually an immune system. The fundamental power to remove Trump from office—impeachment—is still there, as provided by the Constitution; the issue is that no one is willing to use it. And that unwillingness is ultimately what the world is judging, because when they wonder why no one is using it, it’s impossible to avoid concluding that no one else in the government of the United States of America, despite everything Trump is doing, thinks there’s actually a problem to address.

Perhaps this conclusion is unfair, though, so let’s take a moment to consider whether there could be any sort justification for Congress’s inaction. And, more specifically, the Democratic members of Congress, because while it’s an indefensible abdication of their own oath of office for Republican members of Congress to refuse to police Trump, because in theory he’s their guy, it’s something else for the political opposition to also refuse to, especially when he’s supposedly not their guy at all.

Perhaps that opposition may begin to explain the reluctance to take action: for better or worse, Trump was duly elected President and in general it is a good thing if democratic expressions of political will are respected, even, and especially, by those who disagree with them. As Trump himself illustrates, de-legitimizing election results is not healthy for a sustainable democracy. There may also be the pragmatic concern that taking aim at someone the people chose is bad politics, because it will antagonize the electorate so that they never vote for you, although recent polls and election results strongly suggest that this fear is unfounded. Furthermore, Trump never should have been on the ballot in the first place. As an ineligible insurrectionist he never was someone that Americans should have been able to choose to be President, and that he was nevertheless voted into office already means his reign is inherently illegitimate, and in a way that undermines our democracy more than if its legitimacy were challenged. But even setting his eligibility doubts aside, it’s one thing to acknowledge Trump as the legitimately-elected President. But it’s another entirely to allow him, as President, more power than the office actually grants him and shrug off the unconstitutional ways he abuses it. The Constitution only grants him so much, and no one has the right to grant him more by failing to check him when he has nevertheless taken it.

Perhaps some of the reluctance to press for impeachment is out of the concern that, terrible president or no, Congress still has a job to do to run the country, and bad things can happen if it turns its attention away. But this sort of mis-prioritization can’t withstand scrutiny either. For one thing, bad things are already happening by not acting to stop Trump. And not just all the bad things he’s doing, but all the bad things that Congress is doing too, like not passing ACA subsidies, or spending its time instead doing antidemocratic things like trying to pass First Amendment-violating legislation to censor the Internet, as if this moment of looming autocracy were a good time to join in on the constitutional violations too.

Perhaps the reticence to pursue impeachment is motivated by the desire to remain cordial with colleagues across the aisle, in the hopes that it could lead to mutually-negotiated solutions. If so, however, it doesn’t seem like such politesse is paying off particularly well—after all, those ACA subsidies still haven’t been passed, and Trump remains in office, doing things that hurt Americans, including the constituents of both Democrats and Republicans, along with the rest of the world and our standing in it. While it is true that there have been some small successes managing to restrain Trump here and there using more traditional political pressure, at best such efforts are like trying to drain the ocean with a teaspoon, one issue at a time, while meanwhile a deluge of chaos drowns us all. Congress has still left us all defenseless to danger that by not even trying to do what it would take to stop it.

And even if the concern about bringing impeachment now is that it wouldn’t have the votes to pass, it would still be bad math. First, by not pressing impeachment it prevents the political calculus from evolving so that there could come to be enough votes—no one needs to join the push for it if there’s no push happening. And it makes it doubtful that there would ever be enough votes, not even after midterms—assuming, of course, that an unchecked Trump doesn’t do something to interfere with them happening. If Congress is waiting for voters to send them more colleagues who will join them in impeaching, voters will need to know that there is an impeachment effort to be joined. Yet so far there is none. Not impeaching sends the signal that impeachment isn’t warranted, and if it isn’t warranted by now, there’s little reason for anyone to think that those already not bothering to try are ever going to change their mind and start.

Ultimately, no matter what members of Congress tell themselves to try to justify why they have acquiesced to Trump instead of playing the best card the Constitution gave them to stop him, all of those excuses ultimately fall flat. Trump is destroying America, but by refusing to use the tools the Constitution gave them to stop him, it is Congress that is finishing it off for good. Not just by letting him wreck everything we’ve built for 250 years, and the lives and liberties—as well as global and economic stability—that depended on the Constitution’s promise being fulfilled. But by doing nothing it instead sends the very loud message, now reverberating around the globe, that everything he and his subordinates are doing is fine, when the reality is anything but.

And the world is noticing. When they look at America they see it not as a strong, stalwart ally, but a frail country with weak civic institutions vulnerable to capture, indifferent to such a fate as long as it doesn’t affect the price of eggs, and possibly not even then. Worse, as Congress refuses to defend America from the exigent danger Trump represents to it and the world, and through its inaction instead enable it, the world is left to conclude that Trump is what America wants, because no one governing it is saying otherwise.

Without a sign that America does not want Trump, other countries are forced to presume it does and act accordingly, even when doing so is bad for themselves and the future—and even us. Not only does it mean they can’t support us in our effort to rid ourselves of him, because there is no effort to support, but in the absence of any official pushback they have little choice but to accept him as legitimate, even though doing so only reinforces the power he is abusing and makes reclaiming America from his lawless grasp that much harder to eventually effect.

Yet there seems to be this naïve belief held by many of the same cowered members of Congress currently doing nothing that somehow the problem will magically resolve, and once Trump is somehow eventually out of office America will simply be welcomed back to the world stage as a respected member of the global order. As if all we need to do is wait for his chaotic storm to pass and then we can all pick up where we left off. And as if the world will simply forgive and forget the real and often irreparable harm Trump has been inflicting, far beyond America’s borders, and that America has been refusing to even try to lift a finger to stop.

The world will not. Failing to impeach, among all its other infirmities, is a long-term foreign policy problem. Without impeachment, to not just dislodge Trump from office so he can no longer hurt us anymore but unequivocally condemn the harm he has already inflicted, and not just on ourselves, we will be resented, and rightly so. Not for what Trump has himself done, but for what we have been glad to let him do to us all.

Filed Under: congress, donald trump, impeachment, reputation

I’ve lost track of how much money I’ve spent on my kitchen in the last decade or so. You see, I have a thing for affordable cooking tech, all so I can experiment. More often than not, I might have used an item once only, then it’s forgotten in a drawer.

Nonetheless, I still keep hunting them down and I’ve listed 12 of my finds from Amazon’s ongoing Big Smile Sale.

Apple is taking another run at the premium wireless headphone market with the updated AirPods Max 2, a product that attempts to push its over-ear lineup closer to the center of Apple’s broader audio ecosystem. Powered by the company’s H2 chip, the new model brings a combination of lossless audio support (24-bit/48 kHz via USB-C), Personalized Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking, Adaptive EQ, and enhanced active noise cancellation; all designed to deliver more detailed playback across music, films, and games while integrating tightly with Apple devices and services. 

But the technology story only tells part of what Apple is trying to accomplish. The wireless headphone category has become one of the most crowded segments in consumer audio, dominated by strong incumbents like Sony WH‑1000XM6, Bose QuietComfort Ultra Headphones, and Sennheiser Momentum 4 Wireless, while more traditional hi-fi brands such as Focal Bathys and Bowers & Wilkins Px8 S2 have pushed into the category with higher-end designs that emphasize sound quality and materials.

But the bigger story isn’t just the technology. Apple is trying to tighten its grip on the ecosystem advantage that has driven the success of the broader AirPods lineup. Rather than competing strictly on traditional audiophile metrics, the AirPods Max 2 are positioned as a seamless extension of the Apple platform, working across iPhone, iPad, Mac, Apple TV, and Apple Music with features designed to adapt automatically to the listener and their environment.

In other words, the battle Apple is fighting isn’t just about noise cancellation or battery life. It’s about whether the company can convince buyers that ecosystem integration and advanced processing are as important as raw headphone performance in a market where established audio brands have spent decades refining the fundamentals.

Design, Controls, and Comfort

The AirPods Max 2 retain the industrial design language that defined the original model, combining aluminum ear cups, a stainless steel headband frame, and Apple’s signature Digital Crown control system. The overall design focuses on durability and consistent fit while maintaining the acoustic seal necessary for effective noise cancellation and accurate playback.

Control of playback and calls is handled through the Digital Crown, which allows users to press once to play or pause music, take a photo or video, or mute and unmute during calls. Pressing twice skips tracks or ends calls, while rotating the crown adjusts volume with precise incremental control. A separate noise control button manages listening modes such as Active Noise Cancellation and Transparency.

Comfort remains a major design priority. The headband canopy is constructed from a breathable knit mesh, designed to distribute weight more evenly across the head to reduce pressure during extended listening sessions. This structure works with the stainless steel frame to provide stability while maintaining flexibility.

The ear cushions use acoustically engineered memory foam paired with a custom mesh textile that helps maintain a consistent fit and seal around the ear. The aluminum ear cups rotate independently to balance pressure and adapt to different head shapes.

Adjustability comes from telescoping arms that extend smoothly from the stainless steel headband. Once positioned, the arms stay in place to maintain a consistent fit and listening position without requiring frequent readjustment.

Communication and Smart Listening Features

Apple is positioning the AirPods Max 2 as more than a traditional pair of wireless headphones by expanding their communication capabilities through features powered by Apple Intelligence and the H2 processing platform.

One of the most notable additions is Live Translation, designed to help bridge language barriers in real time. By pressing and holding the listening mode button, the headphones can translate spoken language directly into the listener’s preferred language through the ear cups. The feature is intended to simplify everyday conversations when traveling, working internationally, or interacting with people who speak different languages.

Apple has also refined how the headphones respond during conversations with Conversation Awareness. When the user begins speaking, the system automatically lowers the volume of music or other audio while amplifying nearby voices. Once the conversation ends, playback gradually returns to its previous volume without requiring manual adjustments.

Environmental listening modes also receive updates with Loud Sound Reduction and Personalized Volume. Enabled in Transparency and Adaptive Audio modes, Loud Sound Reduction helps soften sudden environmental noise while preserving overall audio clarity. Personalized Volume learns the user’s listening preferences and adjusts playback levels automatically based on surroundings, whether commuting, walking outdoors, or working in quieter environments.

Battery Life, Siri Integration, and Apple Ecosystem Features

Apple has also focused on everyday usability with improvements centered on battery life, voice control, and deeper integration across the Apple ecosystem.

The AirPods Max 2 provide up to 20 hours of listening or video playback with Active Noise Cancellation and Spatial Audio enabled, placing them within the expected range for premium wireless headphones used during travel, commuting, or extended listening sessions.

Voice interaction is handled through Siri, which can be activated simply by saying “Siri” or “Hey Siri.” Users can request music playback, place calls, check calendar events, or ask for directions without touching their device. Apple has also introduced gesture-based responses, allowing users to nod or shake their head when Siri asks whether to read messages, answer calls, or manage notifications.

Device integration remains one of Apple’s key strengths. Automatic Switching allows the headphones to transition seamlessly between Apple devices without manual reconnection. For example, a user listening to music on a Mac can answer an incoming call on an iPhone, with the AirPods Max 2 automatically shifting to the active device.

Additional convenience features include on-head detection, which pauses playback when the headphones are removed and resumes audio when they are placed back on.

Apple also continues to support Audio Sharing, enabling two pairs of compatible AirPods or Beats headphones to listen to the same audio stream from a single iPhone, iPad, Mac, or Apple TV.

Charging has also been updated with USB-C connectivity, aligning the headphones with Apple’s current device ecosystem and allowing users to charge them using the same cable as an iPhone, iPad, or Mac.

Key Technology, Sensors, and Technical Specifications

Beyond its core listening features, the AirPods Max 2 incorporate a combination of sensors, microphones, and processing technology designed to improve sound performance, communication clarity, and system responsiveness.

At the center of the design is the Apple H2 chip, installed in each ear cup. This dual-chip configuration processes features such as active noise cancellation, spatial audio calculations, and real-time listening adjustments. The headphones also use an Apple-designed dynamic driver paired with a custom high dynamic range amplifier, engineered to maintain clarity and control across a wide range of music and listening levels.

The AirPods Max 2 rely on a network of nine microphones to manage noise cancellation and voice communication. Eight microphones focus on monitoring environmental sound for Active Noise Cancellation, while a combination of three microphones handles voice pickup for clearer calls and voice commands.

Multiple sensors also contribute to automatic system behavior and spatial audio tracking. These include optical sensors, position sensors, and case-detection sensors in each ear cup, along with accelerometers in both ear cups and a gyroscope in the left ear cup. Together, these components support features such as dynamic head tracking, automatic playback control, and accurate positioning for spatial audio.

Wireless connectivity is provided through Bluetooth 5.3, supporting stable connections with Apple devices and other compatible hardware. For wired listening, USB-C connectivity allows lossless audio playback and ultra-low latency performance, which may be useful for video production, gaming, or other applications where timing accuracy matters.

Physically, the AirPods Max 2 measure 7.37 inches (187.3 mm) in height, 6.64 inches (168.6 mm) in width, and 3.28 inches (83.4 mm) in depth, with a weight of 13.6 ounces (386.2 grams) including the ear cushions. The included Smart Case, weighing 4.74 ounces (134.5 grams), places the headphones into an ultra-low-power state to help conserve battery charge during storage.

Charging is handled through USB-C, while the battery delivers up to 20 hours of listening time with Active Noise Cancellation enabled.

The headphones also support several accessibility features, including Live Listen audio, customizable headphone levels, and Apple’s Headphone Accommodations settings, which allow users to tailor audio output based on individual hearing preferences.

AirPods Max 2 are fully compatible with iPhone, iPad, Apple Watch, Mac, Apple TV, and Apple Vision Pro devices running current versions of Apple’s operating systems. They can also function as standard Bluetooth headphones with non-Apple devices, though some advanced features may be limited outside the Apple ecosystem.

The Bottom Line

At $549, the AirPods Max 2 sit in the same premium wireless category as models from Sony, Bose, Sennheiser, Bowers & Wilkins, and Focal—but Apple is playing a different game. While many competitors focus primarily on noise cancellation or sound tuning, Apple’s advantage lies in ecosystem integration and computational audio.

Features like lossless audio over USB-C, Personalized Spatial Audio with dynamic head tracking, Live Translation, and seamless device switching across iPhone, Mac, iPad, and Apple TV create an experience that goes beyond traditional headphone performance. The dual H2 chip architecture, deep Siri integration, and features like Conversation Awareness and Personalized Volume also emphasize adaptive listening and real-time processing.

For listeners already invested in Apple’s ecosystem, that level of integration may be the AirPods Max 2’s biggest differentiator. Competing models from Sony, Bose, and Sennheiser may offer longer battery life or different sound signatures, while brands like Focal and Bowers & Wilkins lean more heavily into audiophile tuning and materials. Apple’s approach focuses instead on smart listening features, spatial audio processing, and seamless device interaction, which together define what makes the AirPods Max 2 distinct at this price point.

Where to buy: $549 at Apple (Available March 25, 2026)

Related Reading:

‘This is a speculative report about theoretical approaches,’ Meta responds.

Meta is planning a fresh round of layoffs that could affect 20pc or more of the company’s global workforce, reported Reuters.

The layoffs, which could affect around 15,800 jobs, are meant to offset Meta’s massive AI spend and prepare the company for AI-assisted work instead, sources told the publication. Meta employs nearly 79,000 globally, with around 1,700 in Ireland.

Meta did not verify the contents of the report. A company spokesperson told SiliconRepublic.com: “This is a speculative report about theoretical approaches.”

The Facebook parent, much like many in the Big Tech league, has cut thousands of jobs in recent years in favour of spending billions for its AI build-out.

Meta laid off 5pc of global staff, targeting its “lowest performers”, in early 2025, amounting to around 3,600 people at the time. In October, it cut 600 jobs from its AI division, Superintelligence Labs. In 2022, it cut 11,000 jobs globally, with Irish workers affected, and in 2023, it laid off 10,000 worldwide.

Headcount in Ireland was cut by 20pc in 2024, which followed an 18pc decline during 2023. In early 2025, Meta employed around 2,000 in the country. That number is now down by around 300.

Reports from January 2026 suggested that Meta could cut 10pc of its Reality Labs division, which employs roughly 15,000. In December, it was speculated that the company would be reducing the budget and cutting staff for its ‘metaverse’, to include the ‘Horizon Worlds’ project and its Quest virtual reality unit.

Meta expects its total expenses for the year to be as high as $135bn, driven by an increased investment to support its Superintelligence Labs efforts as well as its core business. The company has been building its own in-house hardware, and poaching key talent from its rivals to boost its AI efforts.

In February, Meta announced a multi-year chip deal with Nvidia that would reportedly cost the company billions of dollars. It struck a $14.2bn deal with CoreWeave for its cloud compute power four months earlier. Meanwhile, a $10bn deal with Google for its cloud services is also speculated.

Recently, Meta spent as much as $3bn to acquire the Chinese-founded AI start-up Manus. Earlier this month, it acquired the viral social platform for AI bots, Moltbook, for an undisclosed amount.

Meta stocks fell by as much as 23pc from their August peak since last Friday (13 March). Investors are also concerned after the company delayed its much anticipated AI model Avocado.

Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.

SpaceX chief Elon Musk said in February that the mighty Starship rocket would embark on its 12th test flight this month, although several more recent reports have suggested that it might not leave the launchpad until early April.

Preflight tests on the Starship rocket have been underway at SpaceX’s Starbase facility in southern Texas as the team works to ready the rocket for showtime.

In an important step toward launch day, the first-stage Super Heavy — the most powerful booster ever to fly — underwent a ground-based engine test, known as a static fire, on Monday.

NASASpaceflight, which has a number of cameras trained on the Starbase site, shared some footage of the test.

It feels like a long old while since Baby Jane Doe (who’s looking good and taking formula well) was the talking point of The Pitt season 2. The shift has gotten more difficult over the last few hours, but the worst is yet to come.

The ER is currently under digital lockdown to prevent a cyber attack, meaning no computer records can be accessed, the number of patients practically doubles every five seconds, and replacement Dr. Al-Hashimi (Sepideh Moafi) isn’t making life easier for anyone.