Amid the debate over the new rules, what is more important, the entertainment spectacle or driver satisfaction? And with changes being considered, what sort of things are likely to be changed? – Kevin and Tim
For this answer, I have combined two separate questions that came in. I hope Kevin and Tim don’t mind.
F1 is a sport first and entertainment second. The hope is that it should be entertaining, and effort is made to make sure that’s the case, but sport can’t be entertaining all the time. You get 0-0 draws in football as much as 5-4 thrillers. Not all rugby matches are as compelling as that between France and England on Saturday evening.
Most of the stakeholders in F1 recognise that as a truism.
Advertisement
The new rules were not arrived at from an entertainment-first standpoint, at least not initially. The engine rules were changed to attract new manufacturers – successfully – and only afterwards was it realised that the chassis rules would be problematic.
Primarily, issues revolve around the fact that with such powerful electrical systems, a nominal 50-50 split between internal combustion and electrical power, batteries of the current size, and front-axle recovery not allowed, the cars are energy starved.
It’s fair to say that many people in F1 recognise the chassis rules are a mish-mash of compromises arrived at as a sticking plaster for the engine rules, while at the same time trying to align a series of competing political positions.
It’s hardly a surprise that, in those circumstances, the rules are less than perfect, to say the least.
Advertisement
The fundamentals of the rules won’t change, but it’s recognised that some areas could be tweaked to reduce some of the bigger compromises.
It’s clear from some remarks Mercedes team boss Toto Wolff made after the race in China that certain changes that have come with the new rules are considered welcome.
“From an entertainment perspective, what we’ve seen today between Ferrari and Mercedes was good racing,” Wolff said.
“Many overtakes. We were all part of Formula 1 where there was no overtake, literally. Sometimes we’re too nostalgic about the good old years. But I think the product is good in itself. We saw quite some racing in the midfield also. And that is, I think, the positive.
Advertisement
“Qualifying flat-out would be nice. But when you look at the fans and the excitement that is there, live, the cheering when there’s overtakes and also on social media, the younger fans, the vast majority, through all the demographics, like the sport at the moment.
“We can always look at how we’re improving it. But at the moment, all the indicators say and all the data say people love it. And I spoke with Stefano (Domenicali, the F1 president). He says that, too. So, it is driving the car that, for some, is not most pleasant.”
That sounds a bit like Wolff is saying the drivers can lump it if they don’t like it.
That being said, there is widespread unease at the way the need for energy management has compromised the purity of not only the driving experience but also the essence of the sport – especially in qualifying, and especially in fast corners, many of which some drivers say are now being used for energy recovery and are no longer taken at the limit of grip.
Advertisement
At the moment, there are two levels of energy recovery. When flat out, a maximum of 250kw, in what is known in F1 jargon as ‘super-clipping’. But 350kw once the driver has lifted and/or braked.
One obvious change would be to allow the cars to super-clip – the most efficient way of recovery – at 350kw. That feels like it could happen pretty soon, perhaps even for the Miami Grand Prix in early May.
Another proposal has been to reduce the power from the electrical components from the current 350kw, to 300kw or 250kw. Then deployment would last longer.
More extensive changes, such as changing the split between internal combustion and electrical power so it was more in favour of the engine, or increasing the fuel-energy limit, would require significant changes to the power-units. So that could not happen before next year at the earliest.
Advertisement
It remains to be seen whether there is appetite for that – especially as people are already beginning to wonder what the next engine regulations will be, and exactly when they will come in.
Brighton should have been awarded a penalty in their 1-0 loss at home to Arsenal on 4 March, the Premier League’s Key Match Incidents (KMI) Panel has said.
The Seagulls were trailing to Bukayo Saka’s ninth-minute goal when they pushed forward in the third minute of first-half stoppage time.
After a cross was delivered from the left, Brighton midfielder Mats Wieffer tried to run into the box towards the flight of the ball but was hauled to the ground by Gabriel Martinelli.
Referee Chris Kavanagh allowed play to continue and it was cleared by the video assistant referee (VAR), Michael Salisbury.
Advertisement
Fabian Hurzeler complained to fourth official David Webb and the Brighton boss ended up exchanging words with Mikel Arteta on the touchline.
The Premier League Match Centre wrote on X that the VAR “deemed there was no clear and obvious error”.
But the KMI Panel voted 4:1 that a spot-kick should have been awarded on the field, and 3:2 that it was a missed VAR intervention.
The ruling said: “Martinelli is not looking at the ball, holds Weiffer into the area and prevents the Brighton player from challenging for the ball.”
Advertisement
It is the second time this season Arsenal have escaped a VAR penalty in an away game they have won 1-0.
There have now been 18 VAR errors logged this season, matching the total for the entire 2024-25 campaign.
From this same gameweek, Leeds United should have been given a penalty in their 1-0 loss at home to Sunderland for Luke O’Nien’s holding offence on Pascal Struijk.
Advertisement
The Gunners have had no VAR mistakes against them.
A crash which started a car fire and left the vehicle on its side saw emergency services called on Saturday, March 14. Cambridgeshire Police were called at around 2pm to a crash on Broadway in Bourn.
Advertisement
The vehicle that had crashed had set on fire. Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue also attended.
A crew from Cambridge along with a south roaming fire engine were called but no firefighting action was required. No one was seriously injured during the incident.
A Cambridgeshire Fire and Rescue spokesperson said: “This was a road traffic collision on Broadway in Bourn on Saturday 14th. A crew from Cambridge along with the south roaming fire engine attended however no firefighting action was required.
“The crews made the area safe and returned to their stations by 3.30pm.”
Advertisement
A spokesperson for Cambridgeshire Police said: “We were called at about 2pm to Broadway in Bourn with reports of a single vehicle collision which resulted in the car being on fire. No serious injuries.”
To get more news and top stories delivered directly to your phone, join our new WhatsApp community.Click this linkto receive your daily dose of CambridgeshireLive content.
We also treat our community members to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. If you don’t like our community, you can check out any time you like. If you’re curious, you can read ourPrivacy Notice.
Arsenal starlet Max Dowman became the Premier League’s youngest-ever goal scorer in a 2-0 win over Everton at the weekend
Mikel Arteta can draw lessons from Arsene Wenger’s mistakes in managing a developing Theo Walcott as he guides Max Dowman at Arsenal. The 16-year-old became the Premier League’s youngest-ever goalscorer at the weekend.
Arteta demonstrated confidence in the youngster on Saturday and introduced him as Arsenal chased the game versus Everton. Dowman didn’t let him down, with his 89th-minute delivery causing havoc and resulting in Viktor Gyokeres’ breakthrough. The icing on the cake arrived in stoppage time when he etched his name into the record books as the top flight’s youngest scorer.
An unavoidable excitement now envelops Dowman in circumstances reminiscent of Walcott’s breakthrough in 2006. Walcott earned a call-up to the England squad for that year’s World Cup following his displays, though Arteta can take lessons from this episode and keep Dowman grounded.
Having only joined Arsenal in January 2006, a teenage Walcott, aged 17, was selected in Sven-Goran Eriksson’s Three Lions squad for the World Cup in Germany that summer after demonstrating tremendous potential.
Walcott didn’t get a chance to play but has since confessed that the call-up was a blunder and he was swamped by attention. Speaking on The Overlap in 2023, he admitted: “Honestly, as a 17-year-old going to the World Cup for me, I should never have gone, I’ve said this.
Advertisement
“Essentially, you try telling a 17-year-old to go and say they’re not going to the World Cup for England, I wasn’t going to do that. I hadn’t asked for it but the manager saw something in me and in the end I didn’t play.”
When questioned if England or Wenger should have done more to protect him at such a tender age, Walcott responded: “Probably both I’d say, because I’d already played up an age for England, so I was already in the books of ‘Keep an eye on this kid,’ I suppose.
“I probably could’ve been protected in that sense. I knew Sven was coming into training and I didn’t think anything of it. Obviously, you’ve got Ashley [Cole] and Sol [Campbell].
“Then I remember Arsene saying, ‘He’s going to watch you’ and I’m like ok, alright, just thinking for the future type of thing. Then suddenly, that happened, and my whole life changed.”
Following the 2-0 victory over Everton on Saturday, Arteta was asked if Dowman could make a last-minute entry into Thomas Tuchel’s squad for this year’s World Cup. His simple response was: “I don’t know. I haven’t heard that. But let’s go game by game, please.”
Evidently, Wenger’s inability to shield Walcott during his teenage years was a mistake. Arteta can heed this warning and has already begun to prevent a similar problem with Dowman by discouraging any England talk, which, it seems, would be the correct course of action.
Sky Sports discounted Premier League and EFL package
Advertisement
This article contains affiliate links, we will receive a commission on any sales we generate from it. Learn more
Sky has slashed the price of its Essential TV and Sky Sports bundle for the 2025/26 season, saving £336 and offering more than 1,400 live matches across the Premier League, EFL and more.
Sky shows at least 215 live Premier League games each season, an increase of up to 100, plus Formula 1, darts, golf and more.
It announced on Tuesday when changes would be taking effect
The Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) has today confirmed when new rules will be introduced for car driving test bookings, which it said would make the system fairer and give learners control of their booking. From May 12, 2026, only learner drivers will be able to book or change a car driving test, while from June 9, 2026, location limitations will apply when moving a booked test.
Advertisement
This follows DVSA’s announcement that from March 31, 2026, the number of changes a learner driver is allowed to make to a car driving test booking will be cut to two, reduced from six. The upcoming changes, which follow a nationwide consultation on improving the booking rules, are part of a crackdown on third-party services abusing the test booking system.
They aim to reduce the reselling of driving tests and will create a level playing field for learner drivers, giving them more control over their learning to drive journey.
Roads and Buses Minister, Simon Lightwood, said: “Learning to drive is hard enough without an unfair booking system. Learners deserve clear, honest access to tests – not being ripped off by third-party sites.
“These changes put learners back in control, stop the system being gamed, and help make sure tests go to those who really need them. I welcome DVSA’s action to make things fairer and support learners on their journey to becoming safe, confident drivers.”
Advertisement
Beverley Warmington, DVSA’s new chief executive, said: “We have listened to learners, driving instructors and voices from across the driver training industry on how to make the booking rules fairer. Our priority is to stop learners being exploited by third parties and put them in control of booking their driving test. The changes announced today will help us achieve that goal and build on the more than 149,000 additional tests delivered between April 2025 and February 2026.”
Driving test booking changes from May 2026
From May 12, 2026, third parties will not be able to book or change practical car driving tests for learner drivers. This includes unofficial test booking and cancellation finder services and driving instructors.
Learners who can’t book a test on GOV.UK and need additional support will still be able to book a test by calling DVSA’s customer service centre. DVSA said it would also introduce terms and conditions for public bookings and introduce a declaration that all car learner drivers must accept before they can complete or change their test booking.
This aims to allow DVSA to take action against those who knowingly break the rules, including where third parties book a driving test on behalf of a learner. Additionally, from June 9, 2026, learners will be able to move their driving test only to the three nearest driving test centres.
Advertisement
It said that introducing a location restriction “will help deter bookings at locations where the learner doesn’t intend to take their test. This will give a clearer view on which areas have the highest demand, allowing DVSA to better manage and focus driving examiner resources”.
It added: “Introducing these changes will disrupt cancellation finding services and make it fairer for learner drivers when searching for and booking their test. When the new rules come in, learners should only ever pay the actual fee DVSA charges – £62 on weekdays and £75 on evenings, weekends and bank holidays – giving them greater control and confidence when booking a driving test.”
Driving instructors and driving schools will still be able to work with their learner drivers to agree when they are test-ready and offer advice and support throughout their learning and booking journey, including via the DVSA Ready to Pass? campaign. They will also be able to set times they’re available to take pupils to their test, preventing learners from booking tests at times that don’t work for their instructors.
Why the driving test changes are being made
The changes follow a consultation on improving driving test booking rules, which ran from May 28 to July 23, 2025 and received more than 100,000 responses. DVSA said that 70.7 per cent of respondents to the consultation agreed or strongly agreed with the idea of limiting bookings to learner drivers only. It added that 42.5 per cent agreed or strongly agreed to restricting the number of swaps or changes an individual could make to their test.
Advertisement
The consultation looked at the ways DVSA could improve the rules for booking driving tests. Of the 93,421 responses we analysed, 72 per cent of respondents were learner drivers. 7.7 per cent of respondents were parents or guardians who booked a test for a learner and 9.9 per cent of respondents were an ADI or trainee driving instructor.
Respondents were asked for their views on two main areas where DVSA could change the driving test booking system. These involved who could book and manage driving tests and how driving test changes could be managed.
Cricket legend Sunil Gavaskar has launched a scathing attack on Sunrisers Leeds for signing Pakistani spinner Abrar Ahmed, claiming the move “indirectly contributes to the deaths of Indian soldiers and civilians”.
The Indian-owned franchise’s £190,000 acquisition of Ahmed for The Hundred had initially appeared to allay fears of a ‘shadow ban’ on Pakistani players from Indian Premier League (IPL) affiliated teams. However, the decision has ignited significant controversy.
Gavaskar, a celebrated figure in Indian cricket, including a 1983 World Cup winner and the first player to reach 10,000 Test runs, delivered a withering critique in his column for the Indian newspaper Mid-Day.
“The furore created by the acquisition of a Pakistani player by the Indian owner of a franchise in The Hundred is hardly surprising,” Gavaskar wrote.
Advertisement
He highlighted the long-standing exclusion of Pakistani players from the IPL since 2009 due to geopolitical tensions.
Gavaskar argued that payments to Pakistani players, through income tax, could ultimately fund arms purchases by their government.
Abrar Ahmed was signed by Sunrisers Leeds at last week’s Hundred auction (AFP/Getty)
“Although belated, the realisation that the fees that they pay to a Pakistani player, who then pays income tax to his government which buys arms and weapons, indirectly contributes to the deaths of Indian soldiers and civilians is making Indian entities refrain from even considering having Pakistani artistes and sportspersons,” he stated.
Advertisement
He further stressed the responsibility of the owner: “Whether it is an Indian entity or an overseas subsidiary of the entity that is making the payment, if the owner is Indian then he or she is contributing to the Indian casualties. It’s as simple as that.”
Questioning the priorities, Gavaskar added: “Surely the owner should have had an understanding of the situation and discouraged the purchase. Is winning a tournament in a format that no other country plays in much more important than Indian lives?”
He concluded with a call for reversal: “There’s still time to undo the wrong and hopefully wiser counsels will prevail.”
Sunrisers Leeds, owned by Sun Group – which also controls IPL side Sunrisers Hyderabad – faced significant online backlash following the signing, leading to the suspension of their X account on the night of the auction.
Advertisement
Despite the controversy, men’s head coach Daniel Vettori had previously insisted he had received “no orders to avoid signing certain individuals”.
The Press Association has contacted Sunrisers Leeds for comment.
Mark Broadhurst, 27, was arrested in September 2024 and was charged with having an explosive substance and possession of a firearm without a licence after two homes in Chesterfield and Bolsover, Derbyshire, were searched.
The defendant, from Chesterfield, appeared at the Old Bailey on Friday via a videolink to deny having various quantities of low explosive black powder, sulphur powder and an “improvised homemade cannon” on or before September 25.
But he admitted having a firearm illegally on the same date.
Advertisement
He previously gave his address as Catterick Garrison, North Yorkshire.
A two-week trial has been set at Sheffield Crown Court for June 29.
Broadhurst, who was suspended by the British Army, was granted continued conditional bail.
Recent research has found that people with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) experience more flickers in wakefulness than others.
ADHD, which is already associated with a higher risk of sleep disorders and daytime sleepiness, is also linked to increased mind wandering and mind blanking.
This paper, published in the Journal of Neuroscience, looked at whether slow-wave brain activity, which has a “sleep-like” effect on the mind, was more common among those with undiagnosed ADHD, and whether those waves might affect people’s attention.
What did the research find?
Advertisement
The scientists looked at the brain waves of 32 people with ADHD who weren’t on medication and 31 neurotypical people during a task which required sustained attention.
They did this through electroencephalography (EEG).
During their task, the participants with ADHD seemed to have more periods of “sleep-like” slow wave activity.
And that seemed to be linked to breaks in attention, mind blanks, and mind wandering.
Advertisement
An increased density of slow-wave activity was also associated with more mistakes, slower reaction times, and higher self-reported sleepiness.
This, the paper said, might mean “slow waves represent a neurophysiological mechanism underlying attentional difficulties in ADHD”.
Does that mean that “sleep loops” always suggest ADHD?
Though people with ADHD had higher rates of slow-wave activity, study author Elaine Pinggal said, “Sleep-like brain activity is a normal phenomenon that happens during demanding tasks. Think of going for a long run and getting tired after a while, which makes you pause to take a break. Everyone experiences these brief moments of sleep-like activity.
Advertisement
“In people with ADHD, however, this activity occurs more frequently, and our research suggests this increased sleep-like activity may be a key brain mechanism that helps explain why these individuals have more difficulty maintaining consistent attention and performance during tasks.”
Researchers hope this finding might help to make better treatment for people with ADHD.
On Sunday night, Trump was alluded to several times over the course of the Academy Awards ceremony, most notably when Kimmel was on stage presenting awards to the year’s winning documentaries.
“As you know there are some countries whose leaders don’t support free speech,” the talk show host said. “I’m not at liberty to say which… let’s just leave it at North Korea and CBS.”
Later, he cryptically declared “oh, man is he gonna be mad his wife wasn’t nominated for this”, referencing Melania Trump’s much-panned documentary, which was released earlier this year.
Advertisement
Elsewhere, he remarked: “There are also documentaries where you walk around the White House trying on shoes.”
Before the Oscars ceremony was even over, White House director of communications Steven Cheung fired back at Kimmel on X.
Referring to Kimmel as “Mr Blackface” (a nod to the comic previously using Blackface to impersonate celebrities including Oprah Winfrey and Snoop Dogg, for which he apologised in 2020), Cheung said: “[Kimmel] is a classless hack who is self-projecting his depression and sadness onto others. He lives a pathetic existence where nobody – not even his family – enjoys his miserable company.
“The only people giving him any attention are Hollywood Elites. BUH-BYE!”
Advertisement
Jimmy Kimmel (Mr. Blackface) is a classless hack who is self-projecting his depression and sadness onto others. He lives a pathetic existence where nobody— not even his family— enjoys his miserable company. The only people giving him any attention are Hollywood Elites. BUH-BYE! https://t.co/cynWTtdidH
During a comedy monologue, the comedian had observed: “We hit some new lows over the weekend with the MAGA gang desperately trying to characterise this kid who murdered Charlie Kirk as anything other than one of them, and doing everything they can to score political points from it.”
Advertisement
After the news of Kimmel’s suspension broke, many called for a boycott of the streaming services Disney+ and Hulu (both of which are owned and operated by Disney, the parent company of ABC), with the company reported to have taken a hit of around $3 billion overnight.
Eventually, he returned to the air just days later, with Kimmel making light of the furore during his first show back.
Speaking to Variety after the Oscars, Kimmel said: “Am I exhausted? Yes, I’m exhausted! Of course! It’s ridiculous! We live in a ridiculous country.
“We always lived in a ridiculous country, but it was always ridiculous in a fun, Mr T kind of way. Now, we’ve got a different Mr T.”
Advertisement
“No, I’m not scared,” he added. “Am I hopeful? I’m always hopeful.”
The residents were in the house at the time of the shooting
Residents of a house in Newry have been ‘left badly shaken’ after a report that shots had been fired through a window of a property, PSNI say.
Advertisement
At around 9.15pm on Monday evening, March 16, it was reported that two shots had been fired through a window in the Damolly Village in Newry.
Detective Inspector Handley added: “The residents, who were in the house at the time, were uninjured however have been left badly shaken by the ordeal.
“Enquiries are ongoing and I am appealing to anyone who may have witnessed anyone suspicious or any suspicious vehicles in the area, or to anyone with CCTV, door-bell or other footage that could assist with the investigation, to contact detectives on 101 quoting 1817 16//03/26.”
Advertisement
Alternatively, information can also be provided online via http://www.psni.police.uk/makeareport/ or Crimestoppers can be contacted anonymously on 0800 555 111 or online at www.crimestoppers-uk.org
You must be logged in to post a comment Login