A week after plans were publicly announced, North Yorkshire Council bosses have pushed through an ‘asset rationalisation’ plan that includes the purchase of Resolution House by the A64 and a move of staff from Scarborough Town Hall and Ryedale House.
At a tense meeting in Malton on Tuesday (March 17), the scheme was presented as a way to avoid up to £19m of costs to upgrade “appalling working conditions” at the ageing coastal town hall site, and could see Malton’s Ryedale House office sold to make way for housing.
Anglo American, which previously had staff based at Resolution House, began marketing the site for disposal earlier this year, with a guide price of £4.5 million, but officers said the agreed price would be “substantially lower”.
The in-principle approval of the plan is subject to finalisation of a contract between Anglo American and NYC.
Local town and county councillors said they were concerned about an absence of engagement and the implications of the move on staff and residents’ access to local decision-making.
Cllr Thomas Murray, town mayor of Scarborough, said: “Scarborough Town Council was not until yesterday meaningfully included in these discussions.”
He called for “concrete changes to ensure meaningful engagement with town and parish councils”.
Cllr Gareth Dadd, deputy leader of North Yorkshire Council (NYC), emphasised that a decision had to be made quickly to secure a favourable deal.
He said: “We can’t allow our staff to work in the conditions that we’ve witnessed over the past six months.
“The business case is robust and stacks up. I wish I could disclose everything in the business case, but that will become public when the deal is finalised.
“The purchase price is substantially lower than the £4.5 million price that’s been mentioned, and we have a duty to protect the taxpayer, and the £15 million – £19 million of repairs needed is not in the public interest.”
North Yorkshire Council currently operates Scarborough Town Hall and Castle House in the town, which provide office space for employees as well as customer services.
The office spaces in Scarborough were described as “appalling” by councillors who added that “windows are falling out” on the upper floors of Ryedale House.
A provisional sum of up to £750,000 was also approved to support the establishment of new front-facing customer service points within Scarborough and Malton town centres, and to fund costs associated with the advancement of redevelopment proposals for vacated sites.
Gary Fielding, corporate director for resources, said: “The town hall is made up of four buildings and this council has inherited a considerable liability due to an absence of investment by SBC.
“The town hall site is significantly underutilised – desk utilisation is low, ranging from 14 per cent on Fridays to 42 per cent midweek – and the current proposal is for customer services to remain in the town centre at Castle House.
“We fully recognise the town hall as a heritage asset, and our aim is to ensure it is properly protected, preserved, and remains occupied and in meaningful use.”
Cllr Keane Duncan, a former member of the executive who represents Norton, said: “My hope this morning is that colleagues will be mindful of the multimillion-pound gamble this could represent without essential further work being completed.
”We should pursue efficiencies, absolutely, but we must do so responsibly, with proper scrutiny, meaningful consultation, care for our staff, respect for localism, and full confidence in a business case.”
Cllr Richard Foster, executive member for managing the environment, said: “I think it’s a gamble worth taking.”
According to a report prepared for the executive committee, the scheme would create “minimum ongoing savings in property running costs of £400,000 per annum and savings of more than £20 million in backlog maintenance liabilities across Ryedale House and Scarborough Town Hall”.
It said that “the total investment proposed in this report would achieve a payback period of less than 10 years based solely on the ongoing savings in property running costs”.
Officers said it was “entirely possible that NYC meetings could continue to be held in the town centre” and that, based on the £470,000 annual running cost of Scarborough Town Hall and the number of public meetings held there, each meeting “equates to a cost of £14,000”.
“I’m disgusted,” shouted a member of the public as they left the council meeting before the decision was approved unanimously.
You must be logged in to post a comment Login