Crypto World
Onchain Data Says Ether May Have Bottomed: Will Traders Buy?
A key Ether (ETH) onchain indicator has climbed to its highest level in over three years, a level last seen when ETH bottomed during the 2022 bear market cycle.
The signal supports the case for an early bottoming phase, despite the weak spot demand and muted price action. Data suggests that ETH may stabilize near the local floor around $2,000, but a sweep of lower price levels remains possible in the coming weeks.
Ether taker flow spikes: Does this confirm the ETH bottom?
The 30-day average of positive Ether net taker volume climbed to $142 million on March 17, reaching levels last seen on July 18, 2022. The net taker volume measures the difference between aggressive buyers and sellers in derivatives markets.
A positive reading signals that market orders lean toward buyers. The recent surge aligns with prior spikes seen in mid-2022 during a correction phase.
These expansions have appeared during transitional periods where traders reposition and add exposure while the price stabilizes near a market bottom, as observed in July 2022 and August 2020.
The Ethereum Coinbase premium index has also been positive since Feb. 24, and the elevated premium levels indicate growing spot demand from US-based traders.
However, crypto analyst Pelin Ay noted that despite the drop in supply-side pressure, the price response has remained relatively muted, possibly due to a lack of dominant buy demand. The analyst said,
“The supply side is bullish, but there are no buyers. It appears that buyers still consider the current price expensive and are waiting for a new bottom.”
Related: Execution quality is the missing metric in Bitcoin and Ethereum markets
What happens if Ether falls below $2,150?
Ether’s short-term support aligns with the 100- and 200-period exponential moving averages (EMAs), but the price is compressing near an ascending trendline, with a potential breakdown placing focus on the lower liquidity zones.
The internal liquidity sits between $2,100 and $2,000 and a more pronounced cluster has formed near $1,905.
A larger liquidation cluster sits at $1,976, where over $3 billion in long positions are open. A move into this zone may trigger forced liquidations and create a short-term imbalance.
If buyers step in, this area may also act as a demand zone and support a price rebound above $2,000.
Crypto trader EliZ outlined a clear threshold at $2,000 on the daily timeframe. Holding above this level keeps the medium-term trend intact. A break below shifts the positioning toward aggressive short exposure, with the lower targets in focus.
Related: Crypto Fear and Greed rebounds off extreme lows as traders re-enter
This article does not contain investment advice or recommendations. Every investment and trading move involves risk, and readers should conduct their own research when making a decision. While we strive to provide accurate and timely information, Cointelegraph does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information in this article. This article may contain forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Cointelegraph will not be liable for any loss or damage arising from your reliance on this information.
TLDR:
- DarkSword exploits six iOS vulnerabilities, including three zero-days, requiring no user clicks to execute.
- Around 270 million iPhones running iOS 18.4 to 18.7 remain exposed until users update to iOS 26.3.
- Three threat actors, including Russian group UNC6353, are linked to the DarkSword exploit campaign.
- Apple has patched all six vulnerabilities; updating immediately is the fastest way to stay protected.
DarkSword, a newly identified iPhone exploit, is placing millions of crypto users at serious risk. Google’s Threat Intelligence Group disclosed the threat in March 2026.
The exploit targets devices running iOS 18.4 through 18.7. Estimates put the number of vulnerable iPhones at around 270 million.
The attack works silently in the background with no clicks required. A single visit to a compromised website can lead to a full device takeover.
How DarkSword Works and What Data It Can Steal
DarkSword exploits a chain of six vulnerabilities, three of which are classified as zero-days. When a user visits a fake or compromised website, hidden code activates on the device.
The process happens in the background, with no visible warnings shown to the user. There is no need for the user to click anything for the attack to succeed.
Once inside the device, attackers can access crypto wallet data and seed phrases stored on the phone. Saved passwords are also exposed, along with private conversations across Telegram, WhatsApp, and iMessage.
On top of that, the malware can extract photos, location history, and record audio through the device microphone.
Crypto Patel shared on X that attackers are specifically hunting for crypto wallet apps and seed phrases. That statement separates DarkSword from a standard espionage operation. It is a targeted financial attack designed to drain the holdings of crypto users.
The threat is especially serious for those who store seed phrases digitally. Security professionals have long advised against saving such data on a mobile device.
DarkSword now provides a concrete reason for crypto holders to reconsider how they secure sensitive information. Moving seed phrase storage offline is a practical step that reduces risk considerably.
Who Is Behind DarkSword and How to Protect Your Device
Google’s investigation linked DarkSword to three separate threat actors. Among them are Russian espionage group UNC6353, Turkish surveillance vendor PARS Defense, and an additional cluster known as UNC6748.
The presence of multiple well-resourced groups behind a single exploit makes the campaign particularly concerning.
Reported targets include users in Ukraine, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, and Malaysia. Still, because the attack spreads through websites, any iPhone user could encounter it. Location alone does not determine who is at risk. Users everywhere should treat the threat as active.
Apple acted swiftly and patched all six vulnerabilities connected to DarkSword. The fix is available through an update to iOS 26.3.
Users who delay that update remain exposed to the full scope of the exploit chain. This is the second major iOS attack reported this month, making timely updates more important than ever.
Beyond the software update, Apple’s Lockdown Mode provides an added layer of defense. Hardware wallets are the safest option for anyone holding large crypto amounts.
Avoiding suspicious websites and refraining from storing seed phrases on any phone remain practical steps every crypto user should follow.
Gold has slipped from above $5,200 while crypto bleeds and silver dumps, exposing “store of value” as a question of volatility, leverage and time horizon, not memes.
Summary
- Gold has dropped about 10–15% from its early‑March spike above $5,200 to around $4,560, but remains structurally elevated and keeps finding dip buyers near the mid‑$4,500s.
- Silver has been hit harder, sliding roughly 20% this month back toward the low‑$70s per ounce, underscoring its role as the high‑beta “altcoin” of the metals complex.
- Crypto is mirroring the direction with more violence: BTC stuck in the high‑$60,000s to low‑$70,000s, total market cap around $2.4 trillion, and Bitcoin dominance near 58% as capital hides in the least ugly risk asset.
Spot gold is trading just below $4,600 today, down roughly 10–15% from its early‑March blow‑off above $5,200, but still structurally elevated versus last year’s range. The parabolic spike has unwound, yet the metal holds a firm bid as a macro hedge, with buyers repeatedly stepping in on dips toward the mid‑$4,500s rather than capitulating en masse. Silver, by contrast, has been punished harder: spot sits around the low‑$70s per ounce after a ~20% month‑to‑date drawdown, with futures pointing to further downside if resistance near $74 holds.
Crypto is mirroring the metals’ directionality but with far more violence. Bitcoin trades around the high‑$60,000s to low‑$70,000s, off more than 4% in the last 24 hours and roughly $17,000 below its level a year ago, as leverage gets flushed out of the system. Total crypto market cap sits in the $2.4–$2.5 trillion band, with BTC dominance above 58%, underscoring how capital is crowding back into the most “respectable” corner of the asset class as altcoins underperform. The tape is classic deleveraging: failed intraday bounces, narrowing leadership, and a persistent bid for liquidity over narrative.
Set against that backdrop, the gold‑versus‑Bitcoin (BTC) framing looks less like a clean binary and more like a duration trade on macro stress. Gold below $4,600 is still signaling strong, but no longer panicked, demand for hard collateral from institutions that care about collateral rehypothecation, margin frameworks, and Basel treatment. Bitcoin around $70,000 is functioning as a high‑beta macro asset: sensitive to rates, dollar strength, and ETF flows, with predictions and technicals flagging risk of a deeper slide toward the mid‑$50,000s if support breaks. Silver, meanwhile, behaves like the altcoin of the metals complex—levered to growth and speculation, attractive on upside days, brutal when liquidity tightens.
For allocators, the positioning logic is blunt. In this regime, gold is the low‑volatility ballast: trim the chase from the $5,000 area, but keep core exposure as long as real yields and geopolitical noise stay elevated. Bitcoin is the liquid convexity leg within crypto, but it is not trading like a safe haven; sizing needs to reflect equity‑like drawdown risk, not ETF‑brochure marketing. Silver and high‑beta altcoins both belong in the same bucket: small notional, strict risk, used for targeted upside rather than any pretense of wealth preservation.
Rumors are circulating that a tentative deal has been struck between the White House and US lawmakers on stablecoin yield, potentially moving the CLARITY crypto market structure bill forward.
Republican Senator Thom Tillis and Democratic Senator Angela Alsobrooks, both members of the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, have reached an “agreement in principle,” according to a Friday Politico report.
“I think what it will do is to allow us to protect innovation, but also gives us the opportunity to prevent widespread deposit flight,” Alsobrooks said, adding that the deal prohibits stablecoin yield on “passive balances.”
Specific details of the prospective deal have yet to emerge, and Senator Tillis said the crypto industry must vet the agreement before it is finalized.
Cointelegraph reached out to the White House for details on the prospective deal but did not receive a response by the time of publication.
Speaking at the DC Blockchain Summit on Wednesday, Wyoming Senator Cynthia Lummis, one of the biggest advocates for digital asset policy on the Hill, said, “We are so close” to passing a comprehensive crypto regulatory framework.
A spokesperson for Senator Lummis told Cointelegraph on Wednesday that a deal is expected to materialize in “the next few days,” and that Senator Lummis is working to hammer out ethics language in the bill.
The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act of 2025, otherwise known as the CLARITY Act, is a major piece of crypto legislation and was widely anticipated to pass without issue after the GENIUS stablecoin framework was signed into law.
However, the bill stalled in January after major industry players, including crypto exchange Coinbase, voiced concerns, including whether stablecoin issuers could share yield with token holders.
Related: CLARITY Act risks handing crypto to centralized players: Gnosis exec
Banks are fearful that the bill will erode market share and cause deposit flight
The banking industry opposes yield-bearing stablecoins, citing concerns over the flight of bank deposits, which have yields far below 1%, and the erosion of banking market share.
Patrick Witt, the executive director of the White House Council of Advisors for Digital Assets, said that these concerns are overblown.
A wave of fresh capital will likely enter the US banking industry if dollar-pegged yield-bearing stablecoins are legalized and regulated, Witt said.
Magazine: Crypto wanted to overthrow banks, now it’s becoming them in the stablecoin fight
Google Threat Intelligence has flagged a new crypto-stealing malware named “Ghostblade” targeting Apple iOS devices. Described as part of the DarkSword family of browser-based tools, Ghostblade is engineered to siphon private keys and other sensitive data in a rapid, discreet burst rather than a continuous, always-on presence on the device.
Written in JavaScript, Ghostblade activates, harvests data from the compromised device, and relays it to malicious servers before shutting down. Researchers note that the malware’s design makes it harder to detect, as it does not require additional plugins and ceases operation once data extraction completes. Google’s threat intelligence team highlights that Ghostblade also takes steps to avoid detection by deleting crash reports that would otherwise alert Apple’s telemetry systems.
Beyond private keys, the malware is capable of accessing and transmitting messaging data from iMessage, Telegram, and WhatsApp. It can also harvest SIM card information, user identity details, multimedia files, geolocation data, and access various system settings. The broader DarkSword framework, which Ghostblade belongs to, is cited by Google as part of an evolving set of threats illustrating how attackers continually refine their toolkit to target crypto users.
For readers who track threat trends, Ghostblade sits alongside other components of the DarkSword iOS exploit chain described by Google Threat Intelligence. The set of tools is observed within a wider context of crypto-threat evolution, including reports on iOS-based exploit kits used in crypto phishing campaigns.
Key takeaways
- Ghostblade represents a JavaScript-based crypto-stealing threat on iOS, delivered as part of the DarkSword ecosystem and designed for fast data exfiltration.
- The malware operates briefly and non-continuously, reducing the likelihood of long-term device footholds and complicating detection.
- It can relay sensitive data from iMessage, Telegram, and WhatsApp, and can access SIM information, identity data, multimedia, geolocation, and system settings, while also erasing crash reports to evade discovery.
- The development aligns with a broader shift in the threat landscape toward social-engineering and data-extraction tactics that exploit human behavior, not just software vulnerabilities.
- February’s crypto-hacking losses dropped sharply to $49 million from $385 million in January, signaling a pivot from code-based intrusions to phishing and wallet-poisoning techniques, according to Nominis.
Ghostblade and the DarkSword ecosystem: what’s known
Google’s researchers describe Ghostblade as a component of the DarkSword family—a suite of browser-based malware tools that target crypto users by stealing private keys and related data. Ghostblade’s JavaScript core allows rapid interaction with the device while remaining lightweight and transient. This design choice is consistent with other recent on-device threats that favor quick data exfiltration cycles over prolonged infections.
In practice, the malware’s capabilities extend beyond mere key theft. By accessing messaging apps such as iMessage, Telegram, and WhatsApp, attackers can intercept conversations, credentials, and potentially sensitive attachments. The inclusion of SIM card information and geolocation access broadens the potential attack surface, enabling more comprehensive identity theft and fraud scenarios. Crucially, the malware’s ability to wipe crash reporting further obscures activity, complicating post-infection forensics for both victims and defenders.
As part of the broader DarkSword discourse, Ghostblade underscores the ongoing arms race in on-device threat intelligence. Google Threat Intelligence has framed DarkSword as one of the latest examples illustrating how malicious actors continue to refine iOS-focused attack chains, exploiting the strong trust users place in their devices and the apps they rely on for daily communication and finance.
From code-centric intrusions to human-factor exploits
The February 2026 crypto-hacking landscape reflects a marked shift in attacker behavior. According to Nominis, total losses from crypto hacks fell to $49 million in February, a steep drop from $385 million in January. The firm attributes the decline to a pivot away from purely code-based threats toward schemes that leverage human error, including phishing attempts, wallet poisoning attacks, and other social-engineering vectors that lead users to unwittingly reveal keys or credentials.
Phishing remains a central tactic. Attackers deploy fake websites designed to resemble legitimate platforms, often with URLs that mimic real sites to lure users into entering private keys, seed phrases, or wallet passwords. When users interact with these lookalike interfaces—whether by logging in, approving transactions, or pasting sensitive data—the attackers gain direct access to funds and credentials. This shift toward human-targeted exploits has implications for how exchanges, wallets, and users must defend themselves, emphasizing user education alongside technical safeguards.
The February data point aligns with a broader industry narrative: while code-level exploits and zero-days continue to mature, a growing share of the risk to crypto holdings comes from social-engineering exploits that exploit well-established human behaviors—trust, urgency, and the habitual use of familiar interfaces. For industry observers, the takeaway is not only about patching software vulnerabilities but also about hardening the human element of security through education, more robust authentication, and safer onboarding experiences for wallet users.
Implications for users, wallets, and builders
Ghostblade’s emergence—and the accompanying trend toward human-centered attacks—highlights several practical takeaways for users and developers alike. First, device hygiene remains critical. Keeping iOS up to date, applying app and browser hardening measures, and employing hardware wallets or secure enclaves for private keys can raise the bar against rapid exfiltration attacks.
Second, users should exercise heightened caution with messaging apps and web surfaces. The convergence of on-device data access with phishing-style deception means that even seemingly benign interactions—opening a link, approving a permission, or pasting a seed phrase—can become a gateway for theft. Multi-factor authentication, authentication apps, and biometric protections can help reduce risk, but education and skepticism about unexpected prompts are equally vital.
For builders, the Ghostblade case emphasizes the importance of anti-phishing controls, secure key management flows, and transparent user warnings around sensitive operations. It also reinforces the value of continuous threat intelligence sharing—especially around on-device threats that blend browser-based tools with mobile operating system features. Cross-industry collaboration remains essential to detect novel exploitation chains before they become widely effective.
What to watch next
As Google Threat Intelligence and other researchers continue to track DarkSword-linked activity, observers should monitor updates on iOS exploit chains and the emergence of similarly stealthy, short-duration malware. The February shift toward human-factor vulnerabilities suggests a future where defenders must bolster both technical safeguards and user-facing education to reduce exposure to phishing and wallet-poisoning schemes. For readers, the next milestones include any formal threat intel advisories on iOS crypto threats, new detections from security vendors, and how major platforms adapt their anti-phishing and fraud-prevention measures in response to these evolving playbooks.
In the meantime, keeping a watchful eye on threat intelligence backstops—such as Google Threat Intelligence’s reporting on DarkSword and related iOS exploits, along with ongoing analyses from Nominis and other blockchain security researchers—will be essential for assessing risk and refining defenses against crypto-focused cybercrime.
TLDR:
- Bitcoin trades near $70K ahead of Eid 2026, aligning with recent consolidation ranges.
- Historical Eid periods show mixed outcomes despite recurring increases in trading activity.
- Market participation often rises during Eid due to higher liquidity and festive spending.
- Price movements during Eid reflect broader cycles rather than fixed seasonal direction.
Bitcoin is trading near $70,000 as Eid 2026 approaches, reflecting steady market conditions. Historical data show that Eid periods often bring increased activity, though price direction varies each year depending on broader market cycles and liquidity conditions.
Bitcoin Holds Near $70K Ahead of Eid 2026
Recent market data places Bitcoin at $69,764.71, with a 0.23% daily increase. Estimates suggest a range between $65,000 and $75,000 during Eid 2026. This aligns with the consolidation seen throughout March.
A post from Syndicate Official noted similar expectations. The tweet pointed to current trading levels between $68,000 and $70,000. Such projections reflect cautious market positioning ahead of the holiday period.
Compared to past Eid cycles, current levels remain elevated. In 2024, Bitcoin traded near $69,350 during Eid. Meanwhile, 2023 and 2022 recorded lower levels at $27,270 and $38,520. This contrast shows stronger market positioning entering 2026.
Earlier cycles also showed upward movement. Bitcoin reached $2,590 in 2017 and $8,720 in 2020 during Eid periods. These shifts followed broader market expansions rather than isolated seasonal drivers.
Comparing Past Eid Cycles and Market Behavior
Historical patterns show increased trading activity during Eid. Liquidity often rises due to bonuses and festive spending. As a result, short-term buying pressure tends to increase during this period.
However, price direction has not remained consistent. While some years recorded gains, others showed declines despite higher participation. This indicates that external market conditions continue to guide price movement.
Social media discussions frequently mention the “Eid effect” in crypto markets. These narratives often point to higher retail engagement. Still, data suggest that broader trends remain the dominant factor in price behavior.
Institutional players also monitor these periods closely. Increased retail activity can create short bursts of volatility. Even so, overall direction depends on macro trends and ongoing market cycles.
While ETF outflows grabbed attention, about $13b quietly moved into crypto via OTC, prime brokerage, and private funds, showing institutional demand runs deeper than ETF dashboards.
Summary
- A Daily Chain briefing highlights roughly $13b in capital flowing into crypto this week via prime brokers, OTC desks, structured products, and private vehicles that never show up in ETF flow reports.
- Finery Markets data show institutional crypto spot OTC volumes jumped 109% year-over-year in 2025, far outpacing the 9% growth in top-20 CEX spot trading as large players favor discreet block execution.
- BlackRock’s recent $140m transfer of 47,728 ETH and 544 BTC to Coinbase Prime is a visible example of this “shadow” institutional channel, reinforcing that ETF data understates real big-money demand.
While Bitcoin (BTC) spot ETF outflows dominated market commentary this week — including a $129 million net redemption on Wednesday that snapped a seven-day inflow streak — a far larger and largely unreported capital movement was taking place in parallel: approximately $13 billion flowing into crypto through institutional channels that operate entirely outside the ETF wrapper and below the radar of most retail-facing data providers.
The figure, highlighted in today’s Daily Chain briefing, refers to capital moving through prime brokerage desks, OTC trading facilities, structured products, and private fund vehicles — the infrastructure layer that services sovereign wealth funds, family offices, hedge funds, and corporate treasuries that either cannot or choose not to access crypto through publicly listed ETFs. This distinction matters enormously for understanding the true state of institutional demand, which headline ETF flow data alone systematically understates.
The scale of this hidden layer has grown dramatically. Institutional crypto spot OTC trading rose 109% year-over-year in 2025, according to data from Finery Markets, as large players increasingly favored the price certainty, reduced market impact, and counterparty discretion that OTC desks offer over exchange-based trading. BlackRock’s $140 million deposit into Coinbase Prime earlier today is one visible example of this dynamic — a transaction that occurred entirely off-exchange and would not appear in any ETF flow report.
The $13 billion figure reframes this week’s narrative. The surface-level story — ETF outflows, fear readings, post-FOMC selling — has been unambiguously negative. But beneath it, a parallel institutional market has continued to absorb and deploy capital at a scale that dwarfs the retail-visible flows. This divergence between what the ETF dashboard shows and what is actually moving through institutional rails has become one of the defining features of the 2026 crypto market structure.
It also reflects a broader maturation of the ecosystem. Early institutional Bitcoin exposure was almost entirely channeled through Grayscale’s GBTC or other listed vehicles. Today, the institutional toolkit includes prime brokerage, segregated custody, structured notes, repo-backed leverage products, and direct OTC block trades — each serving different risk, regulatory, and operational requirements. US spot Bitcoin ETFs, for all their profile, now represent just one of many on-ramps.
For market observers, the practical implication is clear: judging the health of institutional crypto demand by ETF flows alone produces a distorted picture. The real money — sovereign funds, large family offices, multi-strategy hedge funds — has always operated in the shadows of the ledger, and the $13 billion moving through those channels this week suggests that conviction among the largest players remains considerably more intact than the fear index of 28 might imply.
Liu also added “head of gaming” at Solana Foundation to her X bio, in what appears to be a pointed joke.
Solana Foundation president Lily Liu said blockchain gaming is dead in an X post today, March 20. A later, self-proclaimed “shitpost” from the Foundation’s chief product officer poked fun at Liu’s statement, but the original post had already set off a wave of comments, both criticizing Liu’s take, and defending the future of web3 gaming.
Liu’s statement, which reads “Also, gaming on a blockchain is not coming back,” was a response to a March 18 X post from Polymarket claiming, somewhat misleadingly, that Meta is shutting down its metaverse division.
In what appears to be an act of self-aware irony, as of today, Liu’s X bio also says she is not only president, but also the “head of gaming” at Solana Foundation, a title that is absent from the exec’s LinkedIn and other profile bios.
No such role appears in any official Solana Foundation communications or staff listings The Defiant could find, strongly suggesting the title was meant to be ironic.
X account Solana Gaming added to the confusion with a post congratulating Liu on her new role as the Foundation’s head of gaming.
Liu has been notably dismissive of the blockchain gaming meta in recent months. In a more extended X post on Feb. 5, Liu said blockchain networks should focus on finance and tech for core use cases, writing:
“I am happy the misadventures around things like gaming in particular are fully dead and over.”
The Solana Foundation president continued, “This blockchain adventure has always been about finance: open financial rails for anyone and everyone on the internet.”
As The Defiant reported last April, MagicBlock’s $7.5 million seed round to build real-time gaming infrastructure on Solana was backed by Solana co-founder Anatoly Yakovenko himself.
Web3 Gaming’s Struggle
As The Defiant reported previously, blockchain-based and crypto-integrated games have struggled to sustain demand. While monthly investments in web3 gaming projects were in the tens of millions of dollars last year, per data from DappRadar, that interest is far lower than capital flows during the sector’s peak in 2021, when blockchain games raked in a total of $4 billion from venture capital firms.
Is Meta’s Metaverse Also Dead?
The Polymarket post about Meta’s metaverse shutdown, which Liu’s post today was a response to, was itself notably misleading. As WIRED reported yesterday, what Meta, the parent company of Facebook, WhatsApp, and Instagram, actually announced was the shutdown of its online, multi-player game Horizon Worlds in VR, reportedly via an email to users on Tuesday. Horizon Worlds, which is also referred to as a metaverse platform, is a project developed by Reality Labs, Meta’s metaverse arm.
However, the tech giant then quickly reversed course, with CTO Andrew Bosworth just days later stating that, in response to users, the company had decided to keep Horizon Worlds running in VR to support existing games and fans, though with limited support, and no new games or major investments.
This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.
The exchange is offering leveraged contracts on major technology stocks and ETFs.
Coinbase on Friday rolled out perpetual futures contracts tied to U.S. equities, becoming one of the first major centralized exchanges to offer the product and expanding its derivatives lineup beyond crypto.
The contracts cover all seven Magnificent 7 stocks — Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Meta, and Tesla — as well as ETF perpetuals tracking the S&P 500 (SPY) and Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) in select jurisdictions. They are available to eligible non-U.S. retail users on Coinbase Advanced and to institutions on Coinbase International Exchange.
The contracts trade around the clock, are cash-settled in USDC, and offer up to 10x leverage on individual stocks and 20x on ETF products. Like crypto perpetuals, they have no expiration date and use a funding rate mechanism to track spot prices.
Competing With DeFi
The launch positions Coinbase against decentralized platforms that have already built significant traction in equity-linked perpetuals. TradeXYZ, the perpetuals arm of Hyperliquid tokenization layer Unit, has crossed $1.4 billion in open interest and routinely processes more than $1 billion in daily volume, according to DeFiLlama.
Earlier this week, the platformlanded a license from S&P Dow Jones Indices to launch the first officially sanctioned S&P 500 perpetual futures contract on-chain — a milestone that lends institutional credibility to the DeFi side of the equity perps market.
Coinbase acknowledged in itsblog post that much of the demand for continuous equity exposure has been concentrated on decentralized venues.
The launch follows Coinbase’s recent push into European derivatives, where its MiFID-regulated entity began offering crypto futures across 26 countries earlier this month. The company said it plans to expand the lineup over time, adding more equities, indices, commodities, and other globally traded assets.
This article was written with the assistance of AI workflows. All our stories are curated, edited and fact-checked by a human.
The two U.S. senators negotiating a controversial provision in the crypto industry’s market structure bill — Republican Thom Tillis and Democrat Angela Alsobrooks — have reportedly agreed on a compromise that could advance the industry’s top priority to the next stage in the Senate.
The two were reported by Politico to have agreed in principle on an approach to stablecoin yield in the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, and that potentially knocks down one of the top unresolved issues in the wide-ranging bill. Still, no further details emerged, other than Alsobrooks reiterating that the yield accord would bar rewards on passive balances of stablecoins.
Bankers had argued that stablecoin rewards on holdings of the U.S. dollar-tied tokens could closely resemble interest on bank deposits, and any threat to that core component of U.S. banking could put lending at risk. Both Alsobrooks and Tillis had agreed to find an approach that wouldn’t threaten banking.
“Sen. Tillis and I do have an agreement in principle,” Alsobrooks told Politico on Friday. “We’ve come a long way. And I think what it will do is to allow us to protect innovation, but also gives us the opportunity to prevent widespread deposit flight.”
The White House was reviewing updated legislative text on Thursday, CoinDesk previously reported. White House officials didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment on the Friday development.
Industry insiders have told CoinDesk that they were aware of a new compromise, but they haven’t yet seen the legislative text that the senators agreed on.
Though the stablecoin question was at the forefront of the Clarity Act negotiations, there remain a number of other points to iron out, including the bill’s treatment of decentralized finance (DeFi), a corner of the sector in which some Democrats had expressed unease over illicit finance.
Lawmakers have suggested in recent days that the Clarity Act could get a Senate Banking Committee hearing late next month. If it’s approved there, it advances toward the Senate floor, though it first needs to be melded with a similar version that already passed in the Senate Agriculture Committee.
Senator Cynthia Lummis, the Republican atop the banking panel’s crypto subcommittee, said earlier this week she expected a hearing in the latter half of April. She posted on image Friday on social media site X that depict a “yield” sign.
Advocates have been hoping for a May resolution of the years-long legislative effort. But Senate floor time is at a premium, and it’s under some threat from unrelated issues, such as the Republican’s voter-ID bill and the back-and-forth over the war in Iran.
Read More: Key U.S. senator on crypto market structure bill negotiation: ‘We think we’ve got it’
UPDATE (March 20, 2026, 15:36 UTC): Adds quote from Senator Alsobrooks and tweet from Senator Lummis.
Google just disclosed a vulnerability that targets iPhone crypto wallets and could have affected an estimated 270 million Apple devices.
The DarkSword exploit, which strings together multiple zero-day vulnerabilities, is still live today and affects iPhones running iOS 18.4 through 18.7, updates that were released between April and September last year.
Up-to-date Apple devices use iOS 26.3.1. However, because many people don’t automatically upgrade, 24% of all iPhones still use iOS 18 according to Apple’s own data.
DarkSword allows hackers to orchestrate six vulnerabilities together to silently compromise devices, dump their Keychain databases, and vacuum up crypto wallet data.
Frequently targeted apps by DarkSword hackers include crypto wallets MetaMask, Phantom, and dozens of others by Coinbase, Ledger, and more. Visiting a poisoned website in Safari is all it takes to trigger the attack.
Google’s Threat Intelligence Group has observed Russian state-linked hackers, a Turkish surveillance vendor, and another threat cluster wielding DarkSword against targets in Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Malaysia, and Ukraine since at least November 2025.
Read more: Legacy DeFi platforms lose $27M as hacking spree continues into 2026
Zero-day access to iPhone crypto wallet files
DarkSword isn’t a keylogger or clipboard sniffer; it gains kernel-level access, then injects JavaScript into privileged iOS system processes to pillage the device.
The sinister toolkit hunts specifically for crypto wallet files, scanning for apps matching terms like “metamask,” “ledger,” “trezor,” “phantom,” “coinbase,” “binance,” and “kraken.” It grabs whatever wallet data it finds.
It can also pull the device’s Keychain database which is an Apple system-level storage service for passwords.
DarkSword can also access WiFi passwords, iCloud data, Safari cookies, iMessages, WhatsApp histories, call logs, location histories, photos, and encryption keys protecting stored credentials called keybags.
Read more: Venus Protocol hacker lost $4.7M after nine months of planning
All six vulnerabilities have now received patches if an iPhone user upgrades their operating system.
Apple addressed most in iOS 18.7.2 and 18.7.3. However, if their passwords, files, or crypto wallet data have already been stolen, all of those credentials and personal security implications would have to be re-secured.
Got a tip? Send us an email securely via Protos Leaks. For more informed news, follow us on X, Bluesky, and Google News, or subscribe to our YouTube channel.
Mohamed Salah faces race to be fit to make FA Cup tie against Manchester City
Mac gaming is better than ever, and it still sucks
Bitcoin Live Trading: Final Warning Before The Next Big Move? Watch This Level! EP1939
Smart energy pays enters the US market, targeting scalable financial infrastructure
Why Israel is blocking foreign journalists from entering
Bitcoin: We’re Entering The Most Dangerous Phase
Bitcoin Live Trading: Final Warning Before The Next Big Move? Watch This Level! EP1939
Part 1 Funcionalidade Sistema Goat Ibex (Open Finance) #openfinance #vendas #erp #estoque #finance
Overdraft Against FDs#Finance options#Benefits #trending
-
Crypto World7 days ago
HYPE Token Enters Net Deflation as HyperCore Buybacks Outpace Staking Rewards
-
Tech5 days agoYour Legally Registered ‘Motorcycle’ Might Not Count Under Proposed US Law
-
Tech3 days agoAre Split Spacebars the Next Big Gaming Keyboard Trend?
-
Sports6 days ago
Why Duke and Michigan Are Dead Even Entering Selection Sunday
-
Business5 days agoSearch for Savannah Guthrie’s Mother Enters Seventh Week with No Arrests
-
Business6 days agoUS Airports Launch Donation Drives for Unpaid TSA Workers as Partial Government Shutdown Enters Fifth Week
-
Crypto World6 days ago
Coinbase and Bybit in Investment Talks: Could Bybit Finally Enter the US Crypto Market?
-
Politics3 hours agoJenni Murray, Long-Serving Woman’s Hour Presenter, Dies Aged 75
-
Business4 days agoAustralian shares drop as Iran war enters third week
-
Business6 days agoCountry star Brantley Gilbert enters growing non-alcoholic beer market
-
Politics3 days agoThe House | The new register to protect children from their abusers shows Parliament at its best
-
Crypto World4 days agoCrypto Lender BlockFills Enters Chapter 11 with Up to $500M in Liabilities
-
News Videos2 days agoRBA board divided on rate cut, unusually buoyant share market | Finance Report | ABC NEWS
-
Fashion4 days ago25 Celebrities with Curly Hair That Are Naturally Beautiful
-
Tech17 hours agoinKONBINI Lets You Spend Summer Days Behind the Register
-
Crypto World2 days agoCanada’s FINTRAC revokes registrations of 23 crypto MSBs in AML crackdown
-
Politics3 days agoReal-time pollution monitoring calls after boy nearly dies
-
Fashion4 hours agoWeekend Open Thread: Adidas – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World6 days agoCrypto Losses Drop 87% in February, But Hackers Are Now Targeting People, Not Code
-
NewsBeat2 days agoResidents in North Lanarkshire reminded to register to vote in Scottish Parliament Election
You must be logged in to post a comment Login