Connect with us

Crypto World

SEC’s Paul Atkins Pushes Congress to Sign CLARITY Act

Published

on

21Shares Introduces JitoSOL ETP to Offer Staking Rewards via Solana

TLDR:

  • SEC Chair Paul Atkins urges Congress to pass the CLARITY Act for clear crypto rules. 
  • Senate Agriculture Committee advances bill expanding CFTC authority over digital assets. 
  • Industry leaders like Coinbase and Ripple welcome clarity for institutional participation. 
  • Prediction markets show growing confidence that the CLARITY Act will pass in 2026. 

 

The CLARITY Act is gaining momentum as SEC Chair Paul Atkins urges Congress to act. The bill seeks to define crypto market rules, protect consumers, and provide legal certainty for both retail and institutional participants in the U.S.

SEC Chair Calls for Immediate Congressional Action

SEC Chair Paul Atkins has publicly urged Congress to pass the CLARITY Act without delay. He stated that current frameworks for cryptocurrency oversight are insufficient to guide the rapidly evolving industry. 

The emphasis is on creating rules through legislation rather than relying on enforcement actions or lawsuits. Atkins highlighted that regulatory uncertainty has become a risk to the market rather than a safeguard for investors. 

He emphasized the importance of clearly defining jurisdiction, protecting consumers, and allowing institutions to operate with legal certainty. The SEC is actively seeking congressional support to implement these measures.

During a joint session with CFTC Chair Michael Salig, both regulators confirmed their commitment to harmonizing regulatory approaches. 

Advertisement

The collaboration aims to provide confidence to market participants and ensure that the United States maintains a leadership position in the global cryptocurrency market.

Coinbase’s chief policy officer described the session as “extremely impressive,” noting Chairman Salig’s focus on bringing global crypto markets back to U.S. oversight. 

The CLARITY Act is not intended to boost prices but to provide clear rules, allowing both retail and institutional participants to operate with certainty.

Atkins also indicated that delay is no longer acceptable. By publicly urging Congress, the SEC signals that a clear regulatory framework is essential for stable and predictable market operations.

Advertisement

Legislative and Industry Support Builds

The Senate Agriculture Committee recently voted 12-11 to advance cryptocurrency market structure legislation, expanding CFTC authority over digital commodities, including Bitcoin.

The bill complements the CLARITY Act framework passed by the House in 2025 and seeks to clarify the roles of the SEC and CFTC in market oversight.

Industry leaders have welcomed this development. Brad Garlinghouse of Ripple Labs stated, “Clarity is better than chaos.” Coinbase worked with banking institutions to rewrite parts of the market structure bill, addressing the concerns of both traditional and digital finance stakeholders.

Prediction markets tracking the bill show odds of passage rising from 20% to 60%, reflecting growing confidence among investors and policymakers. White House crypto czar David Sacks has convened meetings with banks, trade groups, and crypto firms to discuss the CLARITY Act.

Advertisement

If this momentum continues, the legislation could mark the end of the “wild west” environment for U.S. crypto markets. Clearer rules are expected to foster broader institutional participation, provide legal certainty, and support long-term growth across the digital asset ecosystem.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Ethereum L2 Builders Debate Scaling Role After Vitalik’s Rollup Rethink

Published

on

Ethereum L2 Builders Debate Scaling Role After Vitalik’s Rollup Rethink

Several layer-2 builders responded after Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin said the original vision of L2s as the primary scaling engine “no longer makes sense,” calling for a shift toward specialization.

In a Wednesday post, Buterin argued that many L2s have failed to fully inherit Ethereum’s security due to continued reliance on multisig bridges, while the base layer is increasingly capable of handling more throughput via gas-limit increases and future native rollups.

The comments prompted responses from Ethereum layer 2s, who broadly agreed that rollups must evolve beyond being cheaper versions of Ethereum but diverged on whether scaling should remain central to their role.

The Ethereum ecosystem is grappling with a shifting roadmap that aims to make the base layer more capable, while L2s reposition themselves as specialized environments serving distinct technical needs.

Advertisement

Ethereum L2 builders accept shift, differ on scaling’s role

Karl Floersch, a co-founder of the Optimism Foundation, said in an X post that he welcomed the challenge of building a modular L2 stack that supports “the full spectrum of decentralization.”

Source: Karl Floersch

He also acknowledged that major hurdles exist. These include long withdrawal windows, the lack of production-ready Stage 2 proofs and insufficient tooling for cross-chain apps. 

“Stage 2 isn’t production-ready,” Floersch wrote, adding that existing proofs are not yet secure enough to support major bridges. He also supported native Ethereum precompile for rollups, a concept that Buterin recently emphasized as a way to make trustless verification more accessible.

Steven Goldfeder, the co-founder of Arbitrum developer Offchain Labs, took a more forceful stance in a lengthy X thread. He argued that while the rollup model has evolved, scaling remains a core value of L2s. 

Goldfeder said Arbitrum was not built as a “service to Ethereum,” but because Ethereum provides a high-security, low-cost settlement layer that makes large-scale rollups viable.

Advertisement
Source: Steven Goldfeder

He also pushed back on the idea that a scaled Ethereum mainnet could replace the throughput currently handled by L2 networks. Goldfeder cited periods of high activity when Arbitrum and Base processed over 1,000 transactions per second, while Ethereum handled fewer. 

He warned that if Ethereum was perceived to be hostile to rollups, institutions might launch independent layer-1 chains rather than deploy on Ethereum. 

Related: Stablecoin ‘dust’ txs on Ethereum triple post-Fusaka: Coin Metrics

Base frames differentiation, Starknet hints alignment

Jesse Pollak, head of Base, said in an X post that Ethereum’s L1 scaling was “a win for the entire ecosystem.” He agreed that L2s cannot just be “Ethereum but cheaper.” 

Pollak said Base has focused on onboarding users and developers while working toward Stage 2 decentralization, adding that differentiation through applications, account abstraction and privacy features align with the direction Buterin outlined. 

Advertisement
Source: Jesse Pollak

StarkWare CEO Eli Ben-Sasson, whose company develops the non-EVM Starknet rollup, offered a brief but pointed reaction on X, writing: “Say Starknet without saying Starknet.”

Ben-Sasson’s comment hinted that some ZK-native L2s see themselves as already fitting the specialized role Buterin described.

Magazine: Ethereum’s Fusaka fork explained for dummies: What the hell is PeerDAS?