As King Charles continues to distance the monarchy from Andrew, his daughters Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie are reportedly being sidelined.
Andrew and Sarah Ferguson may already be considered unwelcome at major royal events, but now it appears their daughters, Princess Beatrice and Princess Eugenie, could also be facing growing exclusion.
Even before Prince Andrew was arrested on suspicion of misconduct in public office, King Charles had largely kept his younger brother out of the spotlight. Aside from attending a family funeral, Andrew had not appeared publicly with the rest of the Royal Family for some time.
Then last October, ahead of the release of his accuser Virginia Giuffre’s posthumous memoir, the King issued a strongly worded statement announcing that, “notwithstanding” Andrew’s denials of wrongdoing, he would formally strip him of his royal titles and styles. Since then, the controversy surrounding the monarchy has only intensified.
Although King Charles positioned himself as supportive of survivors and took decisive steps to distance the monarchy from Andrew, the release of files related to Jeffrey Epstein by the US Department of Justice has reignited public scrutiny. Newly surfaced photographs appear to show Andrew in the company of young women whose identities have been redacted. Other images reportedly show Epstein with political figures including Peter Mandelson, once again drawing attention to Andrew’s past associations.
With Andrew effectively exiled to Sandringham, attention has now turned to his daughters. Initially, it seemed that Beatrice and Eugenie might escape the scandal that engulfed their parents. In fact, Beatrice was appointed deputy patron of Outward Bound and attended a reception marking the role alongside her uncle Prince Edward at St James’s Palace last November. But in just a few months, the situation appears to have shifted dramatically.
During the Christmas period, the York sisters appeared to carry on as usual. They attended the traditional royal family lunch in London and joined King Charles and senior members of the Royal Family for church on Christmas Day. Now, however, reports suggest they may be barred from several high-profile royal events as the controversy continues.
According to reports, neither Beatrice nor Eugenie will attend Royal Ascot this year, and the restrictions could extend further. They may also be excluded from the Royal Family’s Easter Sunday church service and upcoming royal garden parties. A royal source reportedly said that King Charles believes their presence at public royal occasions could harm the monarchy’s image while the situation remains so sensitive.
Speaking about Royal Ascot, an insider told The i Paper that the sisters might still attend the races privately but would not be permitted to take part in the traditional royal carriage procession.
Royal biographer Russell Myers added that although Prince William previously invited his cousins to help host a garden party at Buckingham Palace with Catherine, Princess of Wales, it is unlikely that such invitations will continue this year. “He can’t be seen to go against the King,” Myers said, noting there is no indication William intends to take a different approach.
While King Charles is said to care deeply about his nieces, the ongoing controversy has reportedly forced him to distance the monarchy from them for the sake of its reputation. One insider told the Daily Mail that Beatrice and Eugenie have become particularly vulnerable as renewed attention is placed on their family’s links to Epstein. Although neither sister has been accused of wrongdoing, their past association with the financier has raised uncomfortable questions.
The situation has reportedly been emotionally difficult for both women, though they are said to be coping in very different ways. According to sources, Beatrice has tried to approach the crisis pragmatically but has been deeply affected by the collapse of the world she once knew and by what she perceives as the Royal Family’s cold response. Eugenie, by contrast, is said to be taking a more avoidant approach, hoping the controversy will eventually fade.
The sisters were reportedly taken by surprise by the decision to exclude them from this year’s Royal Ascot. Some commentators have pointed to signs of tension within the Royal Family long before the current scandal. Photographs from the 2017 Ascot show Catherine, now Princess of Wales, speaking with Zara Tindall while Prince William chatted with Mike Tindall. When Beatrice joined the group, observers noted a noticeable shift in body language, with William appearing to subtly position himself between her and the others.
Body language expert Judi James previously suggested that Catherine’s interaction with Beatrice in those images appeared somewhat distant, hinting that tensions between the York sisters and other royals may have existed even before the Epstein scandal intensified.
There have also long been rumours of cool relations between Catherine and the York princesses. Some reports claim that the sisters, influenced by their father, believed William was “marrying beneath his status,” which allegedly made Catherine’s early years within royal circles uncomfortable.
More recently, relations are said to have cooled further. Reports suggest that Beatrice and Eugenie were left off William and Catherine’s Christmas gift list. According to one source, once Andrew’s links to Epstein appeared more serious than initially believed, Catherine chose to distance herself from the entire York branch of the family.
The fallout has also affected Eugenie’s charitable work. She recently stepped down as patron of Anti-Slavery International, a role she had held for many years, and her name was removed from the organisation’s website amid the controversy. Both sisters have made only a handful of public appearances since the latest developments emerged.
Friends say, however, that Beatrice and Eugenie still feel a strong sense of public duty. They reportedly believe they should not be treated as though they have done something wrong, particularly given that neither has been accused of any crime.
Royal historian Andrew Lownie has suggested that both sisters are eager to maintain good relations with the Royal Family, partly because their futures — including potential business opportunities — remain tied to their royal status. Remaining princesses, he argues, allows them to maintain influence and credibility, particularly in international circles.
However, some experts believe their long-term position within the monarchy may become increasingly uncertain. Royal commentator Richard Palmer has predicted that the sisters could eventually lose their titles as the monarchy continues to streamline its ranks. In his view, being princesses who are not working royals already creates confusion, as they retain status without official duties.
Privately, the strain is said to be taking a heavy toll on Beatrice. Reports suggest she has been struggling emotionally as she confronts the allegations surrounding her father and the damage done to her family’s reputation.
Meanwhile, additional scrutiny has emerged after reports that both sisters received payments from David Rowland, a controversial billionaire associate of Prince Andrew. Sources close to the princesses have said they have no recollection of the alleged payments. Rowland previously helped settle a £1.5 million loan owed by Andrew in 2017, and he later attended Eugenie’s wedding.
Such revelations have prompted some commentators to call for greater transparency from the York family. Others argue that remaining silent may be the wiser course. Royal biographer Ingrid Seward suggested that speaking publicly could worsen the situation and that the sisters have likely been advised to keep a low profile.
Questions also remain about how well Beatrice and Eugenie knew Jeffrey Epstein. Their names appear in documents connected to him, though this alone does not indicate wrongdoing. Most observers assume their initial contact with Epstein came through their parents’ social circle. However, even as adults, the sisters appear to have had at least some level of acquaintance with him, which continues to fuel public speculation.
Get more Daily Record exclusives by signing up for free to Google’s preferred sources. Click HERE













You must be logged in to post a comment Login