Flight cancellations and delays are increasing at New York City’s LaGuardia Airport after an Air Canada Express flight collided with a fire truck while landing late Sunday night.

At least 295 flights departing from LaGuardia were canceled as of 10:30 a.m. ET on Monday, while 15 were delayed, according to data from flight tracking website FlightAware.

The tracker also showed at least 288 flights headed to LaGuardia were canceled as of 10:30 a.m. ET on Monday, and 19 were delayed, according to FlightAware.

FlightAware’s figures show that between LaGuardia’s scheduled arrivals and departures, a total of 582 flights have been canceled and 34 delayed.

LAGUARDIA PLANE CRASH AIR TRAFFIC CONTROL AUDIO REVEALS FRANTIC CALL FOR TRUCK TO ‘STOP, STOP, STOP’

Debris hangs from a damaged Air Canada Express jet that had collided with a ground vehicle at New York’s LaGuardia Airport in Queens, New York on March 23, 2026. (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)

The Air Canada Express CRJ-900 jet, operated by the airline’s regional partner Jazz Aviation, was carrying 72 passengers and four crew members and arrived from Montreal. It was designated as Flight 4686 and the collision crushed the nose of the airliner.

Both the pilot and first officer were killed, according to Jazz and the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, while dozens of injuries were reported.

FRUSTRATED PASSENGERS LASH OUT AT LONG TSA LINES; GOP MESSAGES TO ‘THANK A DEMOCRAT’

People sit at Terminal B of LaGuardia Airport, after an Air Canada Express jet collided with a ground vehicle, in Queens, New York on March 23, 2026. (Shannon Stapleton/Reuters)

Kathryn Garcia, executive director of the Port Authority, said 32 of the 41 injured had been released, while nine remained in the hospital with “serious injuries.”

Garcia said the fire truck was responding to a separate United Airlines aircraft that had declared an emergency when it “reported an issue with odor.”

Air traffic control audio indicated that the fire truck was cleared to cross Runway 4, at taxiway “Delta,” before controllers frantically tried to get the fire truck to stop. 

TSA UNION LEADER WARNS AIRPORT SECURITY RISKS WILL ‘GET WORSE’ AS MAJOR TRAVEL EVENTS LOOM

Stranded travelers sleep on the ground as their flights were cancelled after an Air Canada Express jet collided with a ground vehicle at New York’s LaGuardia Airport in Queens, New York, on March 23, 2026. (Bing Guan/Reuters)

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) said it was deploying a team of experts to investigate the incident, while the Federal Aviation Administration said the airport was expected to remain closed until 2 p.m. ET.

LaGuardia is one of the busiest airports in the country. It served over 30 million annual passengers in 2025, according to the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, with a wide range of airlines operating at the airport.

A screen at Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport shows canceled flights to New York’s LaGuardia Airport after an Air Canada Express jet collided with a ground vehicle there, in Arlington, Virginia, on March 23, 2026. (Jonathan Ernst/Reuters)

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The flight disruptions stemming from the incident at LaGuardia come amid travel disruptions caused by the weeks-long partial government shutdown of the Transportation Security Administration (TSA), which has led to a rise in absences among workers at airport security screening lines.

Reuters contributed to this report.

Capital expenditure has been a huge obstacle for companies that rely on a lot of heavy equipment or infrastructure. Construction, logistics, mining and manufacturing firms have traditionally gone out and bought the gear they need in order to keep running.

While owning the gear gives them control, it also locks up a ton of capital, piles on maintenance bills, and leaves them exposed to the risk of underutilising their assets when they’re not in use.

A big shift is going on right now. Across multiple sectors, companies are moving away from the old model of buying and owning big-ticket assets and are instead turning to on-demand access to the gear and infrastructure they need. This change is revolutionising how capital is allocated in these businesses, and how they manage their risks.

The Problem with Being a Capital-Heavy Business

Ownership used to be seen as a necessity in industries where having access to that gear was essential to getting the job done. Contractors buy excavators, transport companies buy truck fleets, and manufacturers build extra capacity so they can meet demand without relying on outside help.

But this model creates a whole host of problems:

• You need to shell out loads of cash upfront to buy the gear.
• The gear depreciates quickly, leaving you with a fraction of what you paid for it after just a few years.
• There are ongoing costs for maintenance and storage on top of that.
• You’re stuck with the gear even when you don’t need it – which is a waste of money.
• And there’s the risk that you’ll buy a lot of gear and then struggle to use it all when demand drops.

In reality, loads of companies end up with gear that’s not being used very much. That equipment bought for peak demand just sits there idle between projects or during downturns, which means you’re throwing good money after bad on cash that’s not really generating any value.

This is getting worse as margins get tighter, competition gets fiercer, and the pressure to get your capital allocation just right gets more intense.

The Shift Towards Access Over Ownership

So, to get around these problems, companies are starting to adopt the “access over ownership” model. Instead of buying gear that may not even get used all that much, businesses are turning to leasing or renting the equipment and infrastructure they need on demand.

This model is already well established in other areas. Cloud computing made it so that you don’t need to have all the IT hardware lying around on site. Mobility platforms let people use cars without having to buy them. And the same idea is being applied to physical gear and infrastructure now.

In construction, for example, contractors are ditching their own fleets and instead using hired gear to do the job. They keep a core set of assets that they own and use, and then rent or lease the rest as needed for specific projects or phases.

This way, businesses can match their spending to their actual needs.

What Are the Financial Benefits of On-Demand Infrastructure?

One of the key benefits to this approach is that it lets you cut back on capital expenditure. By not having to shell out a fortune upfront to buy the gear, you can keep your capital free for other important priorities like expansion, updating your tech, or hiring more staff.

Some of the key financial benefits are:

• You don’t need to throw down loads of cash upfront to buy some new gear.
• Your cash flow is more predictable, because you’re only paying for the gear when you need it.
• You avoid all the depreciation costs that come from owning stuff that’s not generating a good return for you.
• You save on maintenance and storage costs.
• And your operating expenses become more predictable, which makes it easier to budget and plan.

By treating access to equipment as an operational expense, rather than a capital expense, you get more flexibility and can respond better to changing market conditions.

How On-Demand Infrastructure Improves Asset Utilisation

Another huge problem with the old model is that you end up with a lot of underused assets. Some gear gets used a lot, while other stuff just sits there idle for ages. This reduces your overall return on investment and makes it more expensive to get the job done.

But if you lease or rent the gear you need on demand, you can match your usage to your needs more closely. The gear is used when you need it, and then it’s back on the market when you don’t.

This approach also means you can get access to the specialist gear you need for specific tasks, without having to buy it and then stick it in a warehouse somewhere.

It Lets You Be More Flexible and Scalable

In today’s business world, demand can change overnight. Project pipelines can go up or down, timelines get changed, and market conditions shift. And in that kind of environment, having the flexibility to scale up or down quickly is a huge advantage.

On-demand infrastructure lets you scale your operations without being tied to a fixed asset base. If demand goes up, you can get more gear to meet the demand – and if demand drops, you can cut back and save yourself some cash.

And that’s especially useful in construction, where different projects need different types and volumes of gear at different times.

Digital platforms are making it all a lot easier to track down and get access to the gear you need. Platforms like Quotor give you a view of what’s out there, so you can find the gear you need without having to buy it yourself.

Reducing the Risk of Uncertain Markets

Finally, on-demand infrastructure reduces the long-term risk of buying a lot of gear that may not get used as much as you thought. In industries where the market is volatile – and that’s a lot of industries right now – the risk of buying gear in a boom and then having it go unused in a bust is a real problem.

But if you’re only leasing or renting the gear you need, you’re not committing to anything long-term. You can adjust your resource usage as the market changes – which means you can avoid the costs of maintaining gear that’s not being used.

This risk reduction is getting more and more important as industries have to deal with all the volatility in the market right now.

Technology is Making It All Happen

At the end of the day, all this is being made possible by the rapid advancement of digital technology. Online platforms, data analysis and real-time tracking are all making it easier for businesses to find, compare and access the resources they need.These technologies are making it a lot clearer where you can find the equipment you need and how much it’s going to set you back, which lets companies make decisions alot faster and with alot more info. And to top it off, they just make it a lot easier to get the equipment you need from multiple suppliers without all the hassle that’s usually involved.

As more and more businesses get on board with digital technology, on-demand infrastructure is going to become a whole lot more integrated into how it’s done in the industry, especially in places where equipment is a big deal.

A Shift in How Companies Approach Capital

The idea of on-demand infrastructure is part of a much bigger change in how companies think about capital – rather than just tying up their cash in physical assets they are really starting to value things like flexibility, efficiency, and being able to adapt quickly.

This shift doesn’t mean they aren’t going to own any assets anymore. Lots of companies are still going to have the equipment that really matters to them right up front. But the balance is shifting. People are getting pickier about what they own, and instead they are using access models to fill in the gaps and handle the day to day things that are hard to predict.

In construction this is a pretty fundamental change in how equipment is sourced & used.

Wrap Up

Cutting capital costs with on-demand infrastructure is more than just being cheap – it’s a way for companies to respond to the problems with the way they used to own things, and the fact that things are moving really fast.

By moving from owning things outright to accessing them as you need them, companies can do all sorts of good things like get their equipment running most of the time, reduce how much money they lose to financial risks, and use their capital in some place where it’ll get a better return. As more and more platforms for digital stuff get built out, this model is just going to keep on growing in the asset-intensive industries.

The UK property market continues to evolve, with increasing demand for speed, certainty and flexibility driving growth in the fast house sale sector.

House buying companies — often referred to as cash property buyers — have become a significant part of the market, offering homeowners an alternative to traditional estate agent sales. For many sellers, particularly those facing time pressure, these companies provide a streamlined route to completion.

However, the sector is far from uniform. Business models vary widely, from direct cash purchasers to hybrid platforms reliant on investor networks. As a result, understanding which companies deliver consistently is key.

Below is a business-focused overview of some of the leading house buying companies operating in the UK in 2026, based on scale, structure and market presence.

1. Springbok Properties

A scaled operator with structured sales models

Springbok Properties

is one of the most established and recognisable companies in the UK fast-sale property sector.

From a business standpoint, what differentiates Springbok is its multi-route sales model. Rather than relying on a single acquisition method, the company offers a range of structured solutions designed to align with different seller priorities — including speed, price and certainty.

This operational flexibility allows Springbok to handle higher volumes of transactions while maintaining relatively consistent completion timelines.

The company has also built significant brand equity, supported by a large volume of customer reviews and a strong digital presence.

Business strengths

• Nationwide operational scale
• Structured, multi-channel sales model
• Strong brand recognition and review footprint
• Ability to process high transaction volumes

For sellers and investors alike, Springbok represents one of the more mature and systemised operators within the sector.

2. The Property Buying Company

Direct acquisition model with strong market visibility

The Property Buying Company operates primarily as a direct purchaser, which simplifies the transaction process and reduces reliance on third-party buyers.

From a business perspective, this model offers clarity and speed, making it attractive to sellers seeking straightforward transactions.

The company has invested heavily in marketing, giving it strong visibility within the UK property sector.

Business strengths

• Direct buying model
• Clear and simple transaction structure
• Strong brand awareness

However, as with most direct buyers, pricing is closely tied to valuation models and risk assessment.

3. Good Move

Compliance-led positioning in a lightly regulated sector

Good Move has positioned itself as a regulated house buying company, emphasising transparency and adherence to industry standards.

In a sector where regulation is still evolving, this approach provides a degree of differentiation and appeals to sellers seeking reassurance.

From a business standpoint, Good Move’s focus on compliance reflects a broader trend toward professionalisation within the fast-sale market.

Business strengths

• Compliance-focused positioning
• Transparent communication processes
• Alignment with industry bodies

4. Property Solvers

Hybrid model with investor integration

Property Solvers operates using a hybrid approach, combining direct purchasing with access to an investor network.

This model allows the company to offer flexibility, matching sellers with different types of buyers depending on the property and circumstances.

From a business perspective, hybrid models can increase deal flow but may introduce variability in timelines and pricing.

Business strengths

• Flexible acquisition strategy
• Access to investor capital
• Nationwide coverage

5. WeBuyAnyHome

Brand-led growth within the fast-sale sector

WeBuyAnyHome is one of the most recognisable brands in the UK quick-sale property market, driven largely by its marketing strategy and national reach.

The company focuses on generating high volumes of enquiries through a simplified onboarding process.

While brand strength is a clear advantage, the underlying transaction model often depends on investor participation.

Business strengths

• Strong national brand presence
• High lead generation capacity
• Streamlined enquiry process

Sector Insights: A Market in Transition

The growth of house buying companies reflects broader structural changes within the UK property market.

Key trends include:

• Increased demand for chain-free transactions
• Rising adoption of PropTech and digital workflows
• Greater awareness of alternative selling routes
• A shift toward speed and certainty over maximum price

As a result, the sector is becoming more competitive, with companies refining their models to improve efficiency and conversion rates.

Key Considerations for Sellers

From a business and consumer perspective, due diligence remains essential.

Sellers should assess:

• Whether the company is a direct buyer or intermediary
• The transparency of the valuation process
• Evidence of completed transactions and reviews
• Membership of recognised industry bodies

Understanding these factors can help mitigate risk and ensure a smoother transaction.

Conclusion

House buying companies have established themselves as a viable and growing segment of the UK property market.

While the sector includes a wide range of operators, companies such as Springbok Properties, The Property Buying Company and Good Move demonstrate how scale, structure and transparency can differentiate businesses in an increasingly competitive landscape.

As market conditions continue to evolve, the demand for fast, reliable property transactions is likely to remain strong — ensuring that house buying companies play an increasingly important role in the future of UK real estate.