Connect with us
DAPA Banner

Sports

Why IPL teams are worth billions: Decoding RCB and RR’s valuation playbook | Business

Published

on


Indian Premier League (IPL) franchises Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) and Rajasthan Royals (RR) have raked in billion-dollar valuations, opening a window into how the cash-rich league has evolved from a cricket tournament into a tightly held sports-media economy.

 

 


This raises the question about how IPL teams are valued and whether these valuations are justified.

Advertisement

 
 


What does valuation mean in IPL’s context?

 

To understand how valuation is done, let’s first understand the difference between sale price, business value and brand value. A sale price is what a buyer agrees to pay at a point in time. A business valuation, by contrast, is an estimate of what the franchise should be worth based on expected future cash flows. Brand value is narrower still – it captures the worth of the name, identity and goodwill, but not the full business. 

Advertisement

 

Houlihan Lokey’s 2025 ‘IPL Valuation Study’ defines this distinction. It says brand value is embedded within business value, not equal to it. That is why a brand estimate and a sale price can sit far apart without either being “wrong”. 

 


The report valued RCB’s brand at $269 million and Rajasthan Royals’ at $146 million in 2025. RCPL’s revenue was ₹504 crore in FY25. 

 


Santosh N, managing partner at D&P Advisory, says the reported franchise prices are “at a significant premium to intrinsic value”. If annual revenue for an IPL team is roughly ₹700 crore to ₹800 crore, or under $80 million, then valuations of $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion imply revenue multiples of around 20x to 22x.

Advertisement

 


How are IPL teams valued?

 


The main financial method is discounted cash flow, or DCF. Houlihan Lokey says its IPL business valuation primarily hinges on the income approach, specifically DCF, which estimates the present value of projected future cash flows and terminal value discounted back to today.

 

Advertisement


For brand valuation, it uses the relief-from-royalty method, which estimates what a franchise would have had to pay to license its own brand if it did not own it. The methodology explicitly considers the role of marquee players such as Virat Kohli and MS Dhoni, along with the importance of the brand to sponsors, advertisers and fans. 


Why media rights matter most

 


The biggest anchor in any IPL valuation is the central revenue pool, especially broadcasting and league sponsorships. The Houlihan Lokey report says top franchises generate around ₹650 crore to ₹700 crore in annual revenue, with up to 80 per cent visibility secured before the tournament begins, helped by long-term media rights and front-loaded sponsorship deals.

 

Advertisement
According to Santosh, around 70 to 75 per cent of franchise revenue comes from the central pool, with only about a quarter coming from team-level sources such as sponsorships, ticket sales and merchandising. Of that central pool, he said, each team gets about ₹500 crore a year from the BCCI and around 70 to 80 per cent of that comes from broadcasting. 


This is also why IPL teams are increasingly viewed less as conventional cricket clubs and more as scarce media-linked assets. When media-rights expectations rise, franchise values tend to rise with them.

 


But Santosh also flags a constraint. The broadcasting market has consolidated, mainly by JioHotstar, making it harder to assume a sharp rise in rights values in the next cycle. “So it is difficult to argue that team revenues will rise 30 or 40 per cent, or even 20 to 30 per cent, in the near term. That is why, from a pure valuation standpoint, these numbers are hard to justify,” he says.

Advertisement

 


What makes IPL teams valuable

 


The central pool sets a floor. Team-level strengths then determine the premium.

 

Advertisement


Fan base is one factor. A large, nationwide and digitally active audience improves sponsor pull, merchandise potential and pricing power. Another factor is sponsor quality. Teams that consistently attract blue-chip partners are seen as stronger businesses, not just louder brands.

 


Houlihan Lokey’s study also argues that IPL franchises benefit from an asset-light structure, salary-cap discipline and low fixed-asset exposure compared with many global sports teams.

 

Advertisement


Scarcity matters too. There are only 10 IPL teams, and not all are realistically available for sale. “Out of 10 teams, maybe only one or two are realistically open to investment or sale. When many investors chase very few assets, premiums rise sharply,” says Santosh.

 


Why RCB’s valuation is not much higher than RR’s

 


The sale of both RCB and RR begs another question: why is the valuation of a popular franchise like RCB not significantly higher than that of RR?

Advertisement

 


On one hand, RCB boasts one of the league’s biggest fan bases, mainly driven by Virat Kohli’s stardom, a premium Bengaluru market and strong sponsor appeal. RR, on the other hand, never had a marquee player like Kohli, or boasts of a die-hard fanbase.

 


Santosh says that even though there is a gulf between the brand values of both teams, their revenues may still be nearly the same.

Advertisement

 


“Each franchise gets around ₹500 crore from the BCCI’s central pool, regardless of whether it is at the top or bottom of the table. Team-owned revenue is typically in the ₹200 crore to ₹300 crore range. A team like RR may generate around ₹220 crore on its own, while RCB may generate ₹270 crore to ₹300 crore. So the overall revenue gap remains modest,” he says.

 

  On star power, Santosh says the Kohli effect on RCB should be viewed with caution. “Virat Kohli adds value, but RCB has not yet been able to monetise that value at a dramatically higher level,” he said.

 

Advertisement


What are the risks behind these valuations?

 


The bull case is not without caveats. Santosh identifies three major risks:

 


  • Media consolidation could weaken future bidding intensity for IPL rights.

  • Regulatory or policy action affecting key advertiser categories could hurt broadcaster economics and reduce future rights aggression.

  • Some investors may be building in aggressive assumptions about a much longer IPL window, which remains uncertain because it depends on player availability, support from other cricket boards and sustained viewer appetite.

 


Why buyers may still pay up

 

Advertisement


Santosh says that these assets are not being bought like hold-forever dividend plays. “These (teams) are like trophy assets. For many investors, especially ultra-rich individuals and strategic buyers, the appeal may go beyond return on investment. Ownership brings status, access, visibility and proximity to the worlds of sport, entertainment and business,” he says.

 


The second reason is the exit value. According to Santosh, investors may believe that five or six years from now, demand for these assets will remain strong and someone else will be willing to pay $2.5 billion or $3 billion. In that case, their return comes from capital appreciation, not operating cash flow.

 

Advertisement


“So this is not a hold-forever, collect-dividends investment. It is more likely a prestige asset plus a bet on future resale at a higher price,” he says.

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Sports

‘Hardest golf course in the world’ battering scorecards again this week

Published

on

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Sports

Myzone says it's adding strength training to the mix with HFA announcement

Published

on

Myzone has unveiled three product innovations that are in development as part of its
expanding Motivation Technology (MoTech) ecosystem. 

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Ex-wife of Eagles star Brent Celek goes public with Hollis Thomas

Published

on

NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

An Eagles love story has taken off in the City of Brotherly Love.

Susie Celek, the ex-wife of Super Bowl champion Brent Celek, took to social media this week to reveal her relationship with former Eagles player Hollis Thomas.

Susie shared a video of her and Thomas during various outings, highlighting moments of affection. 

Advertisement

She captioned it, “Life trends show I’m not big on commitment, but I’m stuck on you, big man.” Lionel Richie’s “Stuck on You” was attached to the post.

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Brent Celek and teammates celebrate

Jason Kelce (62), Brent Celek (87) and Zach Ertz (86) of the Philadelphia Eagles celebrate Ertz’s touchdown against the New England Patriots during the fourth quarter in the Super Bowl at U.S. Bank Stadium Feb. 4, 2018, in Minneapolis.  (Gregory Shamus/Getty Images)

The timing of the start of Susie’s relationship with Thomas and the end of her marriage to Celek is unclear.

KYLIE KELCE REVEALS HER ‘DOS AND DON’TS’ OF TALKING TO POSTPARTUM WOMEN: ‘OH, I’M SO SERIOUS’

Advertisement

Celek spent his entire NFL career with the Eagles, helping the franchise win its first Super Bowl title in 2017. He retired after the 2017 season. The tight end missed only one game in his 11-year career.

Brent Celek scores a touchdown

Brent Celek of the Philadelphia Eagles scores a touchdown during the first quarter of a game against the Los Angeles Rams at the Los Angeles Memorial Coliseum Dec. 10, 2017, in Los Angeles.   (Gross/Getty Images)

He finished his career with just under 5,000 receiving yards and 31 touchdowns. Thomas signed with the Eagles in 1996 and left after the 2005 season, two years before Celek joined the franchise.

Brent Celek celebrates after a game

Philadelphia Eagles tight end Brent Celek celebrates after defeating the New England Patriots in the Super Bowl at U.S. Bank Stadium Feb, 4, 2018, in Minneapolis. (Brad Rempel/USA Today Sports)

CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

Thomas spent three seasons with the New Orleans Saints and later had stints with the Rams and Carolina Panthers before retiring after the 2009 season.

Advertisement

Follow Fox News Digital’s sports coverage on X, and subscribe to the Fox News Sports Huddle newsletter.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Sports

Roger Penske’s NASCAR driver says new horsepower will shake up Martinsville weekend

Published

on

Team Penske’s Austin Cindric explained how NASCAR’s horsepower bump will produce extreme tire falloff at Martinsville Speedway. He expects drivers to step off the throttle to preserve rubber.

NASCAR’s 750-horsepower package at Darlington led to 16 lead changes among eight drivers. Many drivers praised the package for its passing ability, but maintained that the front-end nose wash was still a predominant struggle. Joey Logano, in particular, wanted more tire falloff for better racing.

The onus is now upon Goodyear to deliver the right balance between degradation and durability. The last time Goodyear brought softer sets was at Bristol, where tire wear and corded sets produced a chaotic race.

Advertisement

Cindric believes in a similar occurrence at Martinsville this year.

“We’ve trended over the last few years of going to tires that definitely wear out more and more at Martinsville,” he said via X/SiriusXM,”On top of that, now we’re adding adding the power and you know, there were times last year Martinsville where you start to get a full throttle as the right rear and the right front tires fall off, so I definitely think it’s going to make an impact, probably more so than maybe anywhere else.”

“We’re doing two u-turns and coming from a stop in comparison to most the places we go. So from what I did on the sim today and everything else, I think it’s definitely going to make an impact and you’re definitely going to have to be pretty nice to those tires,” Cindric added.

Austin Cindric finished among the top-5 at Darlington, making it his maiden top-10 of the season as well. His teammate Ryan Blaney finished among the podium places and took home 42 points.


Dale Earnhardt Jr. shares verdict on NASCAR’s horsepower package at Darlington

Dale Earnhardt Jr. dropped an honest take on NASCAR’s 750-horsepower package at the recently concluded Goodyear 400 at Darlington Raceway. The Cup Series veteran believes NASCAR can ‘move forward’ with the change.

He also noted that removing downforce from underneath the car and stripping away the diffuser aided the racing product. On the latest episode of Dalr Jr. Download, Earnhardt said,

Advertisement

“It didn’t do anything bad. It didn’t produce anything extraordinary. I think it’s Darlington….Goodyear’s done some great work on the tire. We had guys that were able to pass, able to make moves.”

The 293-lap event saw Tyler Reddick win his fourth trophy in six races, a feat last achieved by Bill Elliott in 1992. The 23XI Racing driver had to overcome a multitude of issues and managed to beat a dominant Brad Keselowski by more than five seconds.

Keselowski was disappointed to lose, but admitted it would’ve been worse if he had the fastest car and still came up short.