Connect with us

Politics

From leadership drama to ideological debate: what to look out for at Conservative party conference | Conservative leadership

Published

on

The first party conference after a defeat generally tends to be a cross between a wake, an inquest, and a beauty contest for those who believe they have the answers to what went wrong. The Conservatives’ gathering in Birmingham is set to be no different – but with a particular emphasis on the third.

So what is in store from Sunday for the embattled party faithful and remaining MPs, plus sections of the media and lobbying industry who decide it’s worth going along for a look?

Four become two

The central drama in Birmingham – for some, the only story in town – is the way it is being largely staged as an opportunity for Kemi Badenoch, Robert Jenrick, James Cleverly and Tom Tugendhat to bat their ideological eyelashes and show some policy leg to party members.

It will be MPs who decide early next month which two will make the final ballot of members, but a strong showing could boost someone’s chances, while a major gaffe could be fatal.

Advertisement

On the main stage, the candidates are split into pairs for cosy-sounding but potentially perilous “meet our candidates” Q&A sessions with members on Monday and Tuesday, while on Wednesday they will all deliver speeches. In the meantime, they will do the rounds of fringe events and media interviews. It is a punishing process, and one Tory chiefs say is very much intended to test them. Let the fun begin.

What went wrong?

Outsiders might say there is remarkably little of this given the way the party plummeted from an 80-seat majority in 2019 to just 121 seats.

There are fringe events to examine everything from internal organisation to why the Tories have been more or less abandoned by young voters, but nothing that necessarily suggests a party acknowledging the scale of the task it faces.

In part, this is about timing. The interim chair, Richard Fuller, will announce details of a review of the party’s processes, but any inquest will mainly have to wait for the new leader, who will not be announced before 2 November.

Advertisement

Why so long?

Speaking of the 2 November end to the leadership contest, expect at least some gripes about the timetable. This is so extended that Rishi Sunak, still officially in charge but only due to be in Birmingham on Sunday, and not even scheduled to make a speech, will have to lead the response to a potentially pivotal budget on 30 October.

The interim nature has brought other consequences, not least an expected dearth of corporate lobbyists, most of whom are staying at home rather than jostling for a coffee with a shadow minister who most likely won’t be in the same job, or any job, come November.

This pervading ennui is likely to see many MPs stay away, not to mention lots of activists. The Labour conference in Liverpool last week was at times so packed that movement between venues slowed to a shuffle. Birmingham could feel quite different.

The ideological direction

If it is a political truism that great political careers are often forged out of terrible defeats, the same can the case for ideological shifts, albeit often only after a false start. From 1979 came New Labour; out of 1997 came David Cameron’s slightly softer Conservatism; 2019 brought Keir Starmer. So what comes now?

Advertisement

The four leadership contenders seem mainly convinced that what their party needs is a further push to the right in hot pursuit of voters tempted by Reform UK, with a particular focus on reducing migration and, in some cases, exit from the European convention on human rights.

Is this the correct way forward for the Tories, or a cul de sac? Will the eventual winner go down in history as a Blair or a Cameron, or a Michael Howard or Jeremy Corbyn? Time will tell – but for now, everyone will have an opinion.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Labour MP Mike Amesbury filmed punching man to the ground in Cheshire | Labour

Published

on

Footage has emerged of a Labour MP punching a man to the ground and then hitting him several more times.

A video published by the Mail shows Mike Amesbury, the MP for Runcorn and Helsby, hitting the man in the face and knocking him to the floor, before standing over him and aiming six more blows at his head.

The security camera footage also shows Amesbury shouting: “You won’t threaten me again, will you?”

Amesbury said in a statement on Saturday night: “Last night I was involved in an incident that took place after I felt threatened on the street following an evening with friends. This morning I contacted Cheshire police myself to report what happened during this incident.

Advertisement

“I will not be making further comment but will, of course, cooperate with any inquiries if required by Cheshire police.”

After an initial video showing the aftermath of the altercation was published on Saturday night, a Labour spokesperson said: “We are aware of an incident that took place last night. We understand that Mike Amesbury MP approached Cheshire police to report what happened this morning himself and that he will cooperate with any inquiries they have.”

The education secretary, Bridget Phillipson, refused to say on Sunday whether Amesbury would have the whip suspended while police investigated.

“Mike Amesbury is cooperating fully with the police,” she said. “He’s gone forward himself to the police, and it is right that the police now look into this matter, investigate and decide what action, if any, is required.”

Advertisement

Officials did not respond on Sunday after footage emerged of the incident.

Cheshire constabulary said in a statement: “At 2.48am on Saturday 26 October, police were called to reports of an assault in Frodsham. A caller reported he had been assaulted by a man in Main Street. Enquiries are ongoing.”

skip past newsletter promotion

The footage shows Amesbury talking to the man at 2.15am in the Cheshire town of Frodsham. Shortly after the man looks away, Amesbury punches him with enough force to knock him to the ground, before standing over him and hitting him repeatedly as a third man tries to prise him away.

Amesbury was a shadow minister in the housing department before the election but was not given a government job after the party came to power. He won his seat with a majority of nearly 15,000 ahead of the second-placed party, Reform UK.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Labour backbenchers accuse Keir Starmer of ‘colonial mindset’ | Labour

Published

on

Three prominent Labour backbenchers have accused Keir Starmer of an “insulting” and “colonial mindset” over his reluctance to discuss reparations for the transatlantic slave trade.

Ahead of a summit of the Commonwealth heads of government in Samoa last week, the prime minister rejected calls to discuss reparations with Caribbean and African nations, with No 10 insisting it was “not on the agenda”.

Starmer said slavery was “abhorrent” but his stance was “looking forward rather than looking backwards”, adding that he wanted to focus on discussing “current future-facing challenges” at the summit instead of “very long, endless discussions about reparations on the past”.

On Sunday the Labour MP Bell Ribeiro-Addy addressed a cross-party reparations conference in London, saying it was “very insulting [to] tell people of African descent to forget and move forward”.

Advertisement

“Reparations are not about relitigating historic injustices, they are about remedying the deep-rooted inequalities that still shape our world today,” she said. “At a time when there is growing awareness of how racial hierarchies that endure to this day were constituted to justify the enslavement and colonisation of African peoples, state-led action on reparations is sadly lacking.”

Another Labour MP, Clive Lewis, said it was surprising Starmer had thought he could take a “colonial mindset” to the summit and “dictate what could and could not be discussed”.

Diane Abbott, the first Black woman to become an MP, co-chaired the conference in London. She said the Labour party previously had plans to establish a national reparations commission but Starmer “seems to have forgotten that”.

“Reparations isn’t about the past, it is about the here and now,” she said. “The descendants of African slaves and colonised peoples continue to suffer from the consequences generations later.

Advertisement

“Real reparations aren’t just about compensation, they’re a way of tackling colonialism’s damaging legacy of racism and inequality. They are about the total system change and repair needed to heal, empower and restore dignity.”

At the conclusion of the Commonwealth heads of government meeting (Chogm), the leaders resolved that “the time has come” for a conversation on reparatory justice.

A document signed by the 56 leaders, including Starmer, stated it was time for a “meaningful, truthful and respectful conversation” about justice for the transatlantic trade in enslaved Africans and chattel enslavement, with the aim of forging “a common future based on equity”.

Ribeiro-Addy, who chairs the all-party parliamentary group for Afrikan Representation, said: “I’m very proud those nations refused to be silenced.”

Advertisement

In a press conference after the summit, Starmer downplayed the significance of the paragraph in the document that called for a conversation about reparatory justice, telling reporters it was a small part of “quite a long communique”.

“None of the discussions have been about money. Our position is very, very clear in relation to that,” he said. He added that the issue would be revisited when a delegation of Caribbean nations visits the UK next year.

Last week, amid mounting pressure, a source in No 10 told the Guardian that the UK could support some forms of reparatory justice, such as restructuring financial institutions and providing debt relief.

“There is a general sense that these multilateral institutions give out loans to developing countries then charge large interest rates for repayments,” the source said.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

CCTV appears to show Labour MP punching man to the ground

Published

on

CCTV appears to show Labour MP punching man to the ground

CCTV footage has emerged appearing to show Labour MP Mike Amesbury punching a man to the ground.

In footage obtained by the Daily Mail, the Runcorn and Helsby MP is apparently seen continuing to hit the man as he lies in the street.

It comes after a different video, posted on X, purported to show Amesbury shouting and swearing at the man lying in the street in Frodsham, Cheshire.

In that clip, Amesbury can be heard shouting: “You won’t threaten the MP ever again, will you?”

Advertisement

Both Amesbury and the Labour Party have been contacted for their response.

It is not clear what happened in the build-up to the moments caught on film.

In a statement issued before the Daily Mail footage emerged, Cheshire Police said: “At 02:48 BST on Saturday 26 October police were called to reports of an assault in Frodsham.

“A caller reported he had been assaulted by a man in Main Street. Enquiries are ongoing.”

Advertisement

Posting on his own Facebook page on Saturday, the 55-year-old backbencher said: “Last night I was involved in an incident that took place after I felt threatened following an evening out with friends.

“This morning I contacted Cheshire Police myself to report what happened.

“I will not be making any further public comment but will of course cooperate with any inquiries if required by Cheshire Police.”

Amesbury has been a Labour MP in Cheshire since 2017 and served as a shadow minister between 2018 and 2024.

Advertisement

In the July general election he won his constituency with a majority of 14,696.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Cutting off Unrwa would deeply harm Israel’s reputation, says UK minister | Foreign policy

Published

on

Israel’s reputation as a democracy would be “deeply harmed” if the Knesset pressed ahead with bills this week that would end all Israeli government cooperation with the Palestinian relief agency Unrwa, the UK’s Middle East minister has said.

Hamish Falconer said such a move at a time when the humanitarian crisis in Gaza was catastrophic and worsening would “neither be in Israel’s interest or realistic”.

His remarks are the strongest criticism yet by a western government minister of the legislation, which could be voted on as early as this week unless the Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, intervenes.

He was speaking as a joint statement was released from seven European foreign ministries, including the UK’s, urging Israel to drop the proposed bill, saying: “It is crucial that Unrwa and other UN organisations be fully able to deliver humanitarian aid and their assistance to those who need it most, fulfilling their mandates effectively.”

Advertisement

Falconer demanded that more aid be allowed to enter Gaza and said too many civilians were being killed in Israeli attacks on Hamas in Gaza. He was speaking at a conference in London convened by the Israeli newspaper Haaretz.

Falconer said the measures taken by the Labour government so far did not indicate any decline in Labour support for the state of Israel, but his remarks were as sharp as any delivered by a Labour minister.

He said: “We are deeply concerned by legislation currently under consideration by the Israeli Knesset which would critically undermine Unrwa. It is neither in Israel’s interest nor realistic.

“Given the agency’s vital role in delivering aid and essential services at a time when more aid should be getting into Gaza, it is deeply harmful to Israel’s international reputation as a democratic country that its lawmakers are taking steps that would make the delivering of food, water, medicines and healthcare more difficult.”

Advertisement

He added: “The international community are clear that Unrwa and other humanitarian organisations must be fully able to deliver aid.”

Many Israelis regard Unrwa as too closely linked with Hamas and also committed to the Palestinian refugees’ right of return.

Falconer, who has recently been to the Egypt-Gaza border, said humanitarian access to Gaza remained wholly inadequate. “I saw for myself thousands of trucks waiting to cross the border,” he said. “Some had been there for months. There were warehouses full of life-saving items – medical equipment, sleeping bags and tarpaulin for the winter. There have been repeated attacks on humanitarian convoys and the level of aid getting in is far too low.”

He challenged Israel’s military tactics inside Gaza, saying: “Hamas is a brutal terrorist organisation, it hides behind Gazan civilians, but all parties must do everything possible to protect civilians and fully respect international humanitarian law.”

Advertisement

He said Israel “must protect civilians even if it means making difficult choices. All too often in the pursuit of Hamas we have seen civilians pay the price. The Israeli government must take all necessary precautions to avoid civilian casualties, to ensure aid can flow into Gaza and freely through all humanitarian land routes.”

Falconer also said: “As long as there is little accountability for settler violence, the government will consider further actions.”

Warning that the risk of further escalation could not be exaggerated, he called for calmer heads to prevail and urged Iran not to retaliate for Saturday’s Israeli attack. The death of the Hamas leader Yahya Sinwar presented an opportunity for a new chapter, he said, and no military solution existed to the crisis.

Speaking at the same event via video link, the former UK prime minister Tony Blair said: “Hamas cannot be allowed to continue to govern Gaza, and Israel will need to pull back to allow the development of a different governance structure for Gaza that would then enable reconstruction to take place.”

Advertisement

Blair said he knew that many in Israel doubted Gaza could ever be run differently, and many assumed a “higher level of support for Hamas than exists in reality”.

He said polls commissioned in August by the Tony Blair Institute showed that the most popular choice was an administration of Gaza representatives with international oversight and linked to the Palestinian Authority. He said the poll showed that in the West Bank there was strong agreement behind moderate to deep reform of the Palestinian Authority.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Education secretary ‘open minded’ on England smacking ban

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
Getty Images Little girl with bunches looking out a large window, inside a green wooden hut. Getty Images

The education secretary has said she is “open minded” to a ban on smacking children in England, but that there are no imminent plans to change the law.

It comes after fresh calls for a ban in England by Children’s Commissioner Dame Rachel de Souza, who suggested adopting similar measures already in place in Scotland and Wales.

Asked if she supports that proposal, Bridget Phillipson told the BBC’s Laura Kuenssberg that the government is “considering it” but legislation would not be brought forward “any time soon”.

Children’s charity the NSPCC called on new legislation “as soon as possible” as there was “mounting evidence” that physically disciplining children could be “damaging”.

Speaking on Sunday morning, Phillipson said she was keen to hear from Dame Rachel and other experts “on how [a ban] would work”.

Advertisement

She added that she thought “we do need to look at how we keep children safe”.

Phillipson added that the upcoming Children’s Wellbeing Bill, which is expected to be introduced “by the end of the year”, will address many of the issues relating to children’s care and safeguarding.

Anna Edmundson, head of policy at the NSPCC, told the BBC that calls had tripled to the charity’s helpline from adults concerned about the use of physical punishment on children.

In a statement she added: “That is why we want the Government to legislate as soon as possible to give children in England the same protection from assault afforded to adults and already in place for children in Scotland and Wales.”

Advertisement

Other charities, including Barnardo’s, have also long called for an English smacking ban and two-thirds of English people polled by YouGov in March last year said physically disciplining a child is not acceptable.

Bridget Phillipson appears on set with Laura Kuenssberg. They are both sitting on red chairs and appear to be talking. The Education Secretary wears a dark pink dress with a memorial poppy pin attached.

Bridget Phillipson on Sunday with Laura Kuenssberg

In England and Northern Ireland it is legal for a carer or parent to discipline their child physically if it is a “reasonable” punishment – but the Children Act 2004 made it illegal to assault a child causing actual or grievous bodily harm.

The previous Conservative government argued parents should be trusted to discipline their children and there were “clear laws in place” to prevent violence.

The Department for Education told the BBC earlier this week that it was now “looking closely” at the law changes made in Scotland and Wales, which came into force in 2020 and 2022 respectively, to see whether more could be done in England.

Advertisement

Posting on X last week, Dame Rachel said a ban on any kind of corporal punishment, including smacking, hitting, slapping and shaking, could stop lower level violence from escalating.

“If we are serious about keeping every child safe, it’s time England takes this necessary step,” she said.

“Too many children have been harmed or killed at the hands of the people who should love and care for them most.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

David Amess’s daughter says Prevent anti-terror scheme ‘isn’t fit for purpose’ | UK security and counter-terrorism

Published

on

The daughter of the murdered MP David Amess has criticised Home Office failures that meant her father’s killer was unmonitored for years before the attack, saying the Prevent programme “isn’t fit for purpose”.

Speaking to the Sunday Times, Katie Amess condemned the fact her father’s killer was known to authorities but his case was closed due to “an admin error”.

“We know the guy did it,” said Katie. “I just want to know how and why he was allowed to … What has been changed to ensure that this never happens again and that another family doesn’t have to go through the absolute heartbreak and trauma that has just shattered our world?

“My father gave 40 years of his life, day in, day out, to his people and his country. He is owed the decency and the respect to find out where he was failed.”

Advertisement

Ali Harbi Ali was convicted of stabbing Amess to death on 15 October 2021 at a church in Leigh-on-Sea, Essex, where the Conservative MP had been holding an advice surgery for people in his Southend West constituency.

It was later revealed that Ali had been referred to the government’s anti-radicalisation Prevent programme, and then for more intensive support through the Channel counter-terrorism programme before his case was closed. He went on to spend at least two years researching which MP to murder.

He told police he had carried out the killing because he was angered by western actions in Syria and saw himself as a soldier of Islamic State.

Katie Amess says the family was told ‘an admin error’ meant her father’s killer was left unmonitored. Photograph: Geoff Pugh/Shutterstock

Katie Amess said the family were told Ali’s case was not followed up in the programme “due to an admin error” that meant a second meeting with the then 18-year-old did not take place.

Advertisement

The newspaper reported that Lincoln Brookes, the senior coroner for Essex, said there had been “some shortcomings” in the Prevent programme and Ali’s case was closed even though problems had not been addressed.

Brookes said “record-keeping is problematic and the rationale for certain decisions was not explicit” and “an opportunity to assess whether or not any progress had been made was missed”.

However, the coroner concluded the programme would not necessarily have prevented the attack and that it “would be speculative to assume that national security services do, should or could, detect and track every Islamic State sympathiser”.

Amess’s family pushed for an inquest to consider the state’s failings in the run-up to Ali’s attack, but in July Brookes ruled there was not enough evidence to justify holding one.

Advertisement

Katie Amess, an actor who lives in California, said she had been diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, while her mother, Julia, 70, who was married to Amess for nearly 40 years, moved out of the family home of three decades in Southend because it was too painful to stay.

“It’s just the most unbearable, unspeakable pain. We’ve lost a great, great man who can’t be replaced. Now I just want to make him proud by fighting back against being told no to something that we should be allowed to know. I can’t accept this,” she said.

“He was reported. People were trying to help us. And so why was he allowed to just go on and do whatever he wanted for seven years? What happened to my dad should not have been an admin error.”

The family wants greater protection for all MPs and is pushing for more answers about what happened to Amess, and how his killer evaded authorities for so long.

Advertisement

“It’s pretty obvious that Prevent isn’t fit for purpose, it has consistently failed people,” Katie Amess said. “It failed me. It failed my family catastrophically, it failed the public and also it failed other members of parliament.”

A Home Office spokesperson said: “Our thoughts continue to be with Sir David Amess’ family and friends. The attack on Sir David Amess was an awful tragedy, the safety of members of parliament is paramount and significant work has been taken forward in response to his tragic killing.

“Prevent is a vital tool to stop people from becoming terrorists or supporting terrorism and tackles all ideological causes of terrorism.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com