Connect with us

News

Voting for Kamala Is an Easy Choice, but It Needs a Hard Sell

Published

on

Rkennedy05

There just are not a whole lot of larger-than-life heroes left in the US.

I am not sure why, but perhaps putting it under a microscope robs most celebrity of its panache and leaves so many potential heroes floundering in their own detritus. Maybe simple fact-checking has served to dull the authority of yesteryear’s heroes and many of today’s pretenders. Then who can speak for us? Who can move us to action, and who can inspire us to care about those who nobody seems to care about?

It will come as no surprise to many that Senator Robert F. Kennedy Sr. was my last hero. He made me a better human being. In his all-too-brief moment in the sun, he grew, and I grew with him.

Do we still have heroes?

Yet amid all the talk about fallen heroes, usually in the warrior context, we rarely examine how they actually lived their lives for fear of tarnishing their moment of truth. Most importantly, we have no agreed-upon standard for the “heroic” that ensures meaningful recognition of the heroes in our midst.

Advertisement

Is one shining moment enough? Is a neighbor a “hero” who hears the cries of a child who has fallen through the ice on a pond and, at some personal risk, jumps in to save the child. Or does the neighbor need to pull it off again to fully qualify, somewhat like the Catholic Church’s requirement for a second miracle on the way to sainthood?

Given the tragedies that often surround us and threaten imminent harm, there must be a whole lot of regular people out there who always seem to answer the call. Not the usual military “heroes,” but nurses, teachers, first responders and good cops, for example. Yet, are they heroes simply for being good at what they are called to do? I don’t know. But I do know that finding those who seem to innately understand that lifting up, reaching out and seeking equity and justice for all when it may be inconvenient to do so is a good place to start looking for real “heroes.”

Villains are much easier to spot. For them, kindness and empathy are signs of weakness, and personal gain is their only hallmark of success. Greed and corruption run deep in the villain pool. And, so often, the villains are the first to tell you that their self-proclaimed “heroic” acts justify their otherwise self-absorbed lives.

Most of us fit somewhere in between, hoping that our better angels will rise to the moment, but often hoping that the test never comes. What would you do if a pregnant woman was being harassed by some young jerk on a bus? Act, or feel relieved when someone else does?

Advertisement

Do we have heroes… in politics?

You may be asking what any of this has to do with much of anything. Well, in today’s divided and troubled times, it could prove critical to find some real heroes in our political midst, to identify what makes them our heroes and then test their message.

At the core of any message that is going to resonate with me must be a commitment to policies and programs that confront the obvious and ongoing inequities in our society. Somehow, a call to a collective conscience has to replace individual vanity and greed with empathy and active caring.

While I am still wishing and hoping, no new hero has emerged in the high-stakes race for the presidency of the United States. The Democratic candidate, Vice President Kamala Harris, is not one of my heroes yet, but the Republican candidate, former President Donald Trump, is surely one of my villains. Harris seems like she actually might be able to do the job she seeks. Trump is demonstrably incapable of doing the job that he seeks. And that simple equation is good enough for me. 

Unfortunately, parsing every word and expressing every momentary concern is already distracting from the obvious. Every responsible public official should in the immediate days ahead be confronted with one question before any other: “Do you believe that a person who is a demonstrated racist, misogynist and immoral narcissist can be qualified to be president of the United States?” When they waiver or refuse to answer, you will know their answer. Ask your friends and neighbors the same question. If they waiver or refuse to answer, you will know their answer, as well.

Advertisement

None of the rest of the questions that we have really matter in the short time before the election. There is, of course, much that I would like to hear Harris and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, talk about in the coming weeks. I would prefer that they do so without allowing the reporters and news readers on the prowl for sensation and their own glory to get in the way.

The September 10 “debate” between Harris and Trump should have been eye-opening to anyone watching with any doubt about the fundamental basic qualification issue. However, these presidential debates have often proven to be short on both impact and insight. We know who Trump is, and no debate is going to alter the stench that he leaves in his wake wherever he goes. I wanted a debate so that others might see what I already know, but more importantly, I wanted an accomplished black woman to kick Trump’s fat ass. She did just that.

As we have seen in this election cycle and before, policy proposals are often the last piece of the candidate puzzle to reach the voters. This is unfortunate because actual governing is about policies and the skill to design and implement the programs that bring those policies to life. 

This time around, we have to get the initial presidential choice right because we have seen the rapacious plan developed by Trump’s acolytes and the scores of right-wing lawyers and academics who have spent their professional lives undermining America’s institutional capacity to govern itself. If you wonder at Trump’s utter lack of any cohesive public policy statements, be assured that draconian policies are there and ready for deployment if Trump wins the upcoming election.

Advertisement

I will vote for Kamala Harris, hero or not, and I will try to do my part to ensure that others do so as well. And maybe this time, there will be enough collective energy to put her over the top simply because she is the only one in the race even arguably qualified for the job. Maybe then, we will find out if Kamala Harris is really someone special, so much more than the only responsible choice. Maybe even a generational hero.

[Hard Left Turn first published this piece.]

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own and do not necessarily reflect Fair Observer’s editorial policy.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

Helene devastated this small Ashe County town. Now its residents are feeding one another

Published

on

Raleigh News and Observer

In just a few hours, Big Horse Creek sent a 10-foot wall of water into the tiny mountain town of Lansing, destroying its row of quaint brick art shops, antique stores and cleverly named pizza parlor — Pie on the Mountain.

Hurricane Helene roared through Lansing’s section of the popular Virginia Creeper Trail and left it strewn with mud, tree trunks and a Winnebago-sized camper turned upside-down in the water.

All along Lansing’s main street, the shopkeepers pulled out soaking walls and floorboards already reeking with mildew, and they offered their canned goods and water bottles for all needy comers.

“This area has been devastated,” said Jeff Pierce, a volunteer at the fire department, “Something we’ve not seen since the 1940s. You’re familiar with Carter-Finley Stadium. Two of those, 40 feet high. That’s how much water.”

Advertisement

As rescue crews cut trees off roads and cleared branches and strips of sheet metal off bridges, the larger world began to see the extent of ruin in North Carolina’s northwest corner.

‘Caskets floating in the river’

While repairing a broken gas line in Boone, Steve Calhoun recalled the worst he’d seen in Ashe County since Friday.

”Caskets floating in the river,” he said. “People in the water and nobody can get to them. Houses in the road. Cars in trees.”

The water has receded, but locals do not expect all the area’s power to be restored for months. The roads to many remote areas, including west of Lansing, are too washed out for crews to reach.

Advertisement

They worry about those still missing, unaccounted for in the chaos.

In Lansing, the Squirrel and Nut got walloped only four months after it opened. It sold local and vintage art, including pieces made by Lora Young, who spent Saturday, Sunday and Monday grilling donated food.

”A lot of us don’t have power,” she said, “so they’re bringing us stuff out of their freezers. Need some food? We’ve got chicken grilling now.”

Volunteers feeding hundreds

At the fire department, volunteers fed 300 people barbecue though the population of the town 33 miles northeast of Boone is only 128.

Advertisement

Pierce led a prayer over the pig cooker, giving thanks and asking for guidance.

”One thing you have to understand about mountain people,” he said. “We’re resilient. We keep fighting.”

As he spoke, the shopkeepers moved up and down Lansing’s main street, shoveling mud.

Young smiled at them over her grill.

Advertisement

”You gave to,” she said. “Once you get a chance to slow down, it’ll all sink in.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

LVMH sells Off-White streetwear brand founded by Virgil Abloh

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

French luxury group LVMH has sold the streetwear brand Off-White founded by the late designer Virgil Abloh to a brand management company. 

LVMH would not disclose the terms of the deal with New-York based Bluestar Alliance, which comes nearly three years after the pioneering designer’s death in 2021. Bluestar also owns fashion brands including Scotch & Soda, Elie Tahari, Bebe and Hurley. 

Advertisement

“LVMH is proud of the legacy that Off-White has built under Virgil Abloh’s visionary leadership. Bluestar Alliance is the perfect partner to carry that legacy forward,” the Paris-listed group controlled by Bernard Arnault said in a statement.

“The acquisition of Off-White . . . will allow for the continuation of the cultural and creative momentum that Virgil ignited,” Bluestar chief executive Joey Gabbay said. 

In 2021 LVMH increased its minority stake to take control of Off-White for an undisclosed sum, months before Abloh’s untimely death. At the time of the deal the group had envisioned an expanded role for Abloh across LVMH to launch brands and collaborations. 

The American creative had been hired to design menswear at Louis Vuitton, the group’s main revenue and profitability driver, in 2018.

Advertisement

The move surprised some in the fashion industry but paid off as LVMH was looking to diversify its audience and younger consumers flocked towards an aesthetic that mixed sneakers and camouflage with formalwear. 

Virgil Abloh passed away from cancer in November 2021 at the age of 41
Virgil Abloh passed away from cancer in November 2021 at the age of 41 © Reuters

However, carrying on Off-White’s legacy without its founder has proved difficult, coinciding with declining demand for streetwear and a slowing global market for luxury goods. 

A push upmarket by the brand was not well received by consumers and wholesale buyers.

An additional layer of complexity was added by the fact that, while LVMH’s purchase gave it ownership of the Off-White trademarks, the label’s operating company — in which LVMH also took a minority stake — still has a licensing agreement in place with New Guards Group, owned by financially troubled online retailer Farfetch.

However, the licensing deal will be up for renegotiation next year. 

Advertisement

Executives at both New Guards Group and LVMH said shortly after Abloh’s passing that he had left behind a large legacy of ideas and plans that would continue to fuel the brand. 

However, Off-White chief executive Cristiano Fagnani described a “critical situation” by the time he took over in 2023 in an interview with Business of Fashion. This was “in part due to the decision to shift positioning; in part due to the challenging situation at Farfetch”.

Since then the brand has looked to revive its fortunes, including debuting at New York Fashion Week earlier this month.

And last week, Off-White announced a partnership with the women’s NBA basketball team New York Liberty, the latest in a wider embrace of women’s sports by luxury fashion brands.

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Sara Germano

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

Tycoon Mike Ashley moves to seize luxury brand Mulberry with £83million offer

Published

on

Tycoon Mike Ashley moves to seize luxury brand Mulberry with £83million offer

MULBERRY faces a handbagging from Mike Ashley after the tycoon launched an £83million offer and declared the luxury brand’s “status quo is an untenable position”.

Mr Ashley’s Frasers Group, which already owns a 37 per cent stake in Mulberry, launched its 130p-a-share bid after complaining it had been blindsided by Mulberry’s cash call on Friday night.

Tycoon Mike Ashley has launched an £83million offer for Muberry

3

Tycoon Mike Ashley has launched an £83million offer for Muberry

Mulberry, which is best known for its £1,195 Alexa handbags, wants to tap investors for £10million after slumping sales knocked it to a loss.

Advertisement

Mulberry’s shares had started the day plunging by 12 per cent on the back of its cash call, but Mr Ashley’s takeover approach sent them rebounding 5.5 per cent higher.

Frasers had briefly considered a takeover in November 2020 when Mulberry was worth £124million.

Frasers said: “We believe the status quo to be an untenable position for Frasers and the other minority holders of Mulberry shares . . . we believe Frasers to be the best steward for returning Mulberry to profitability.”

Mr Ashley will now have to go head to head with Mulberry’s biggest investor, Challice, which owns 56 per cent and is controlled by the Singaporean entrepreneur Christina Ong.

Advertisement

Mulberry’s annual report, released on Friday night, revealed it could breach its banking covenants if its sales tumbled by a worst-case scenario of 14 per cent.

It is understood that Mulberry and the Ong family will reject Mr Ashley’s approach as a lowball attempt.

Sources highlighted Ms Ong had been a long term investor and supportive of the cashcall and Mulberry’s recent hiring of new chief exec Andrea Baldo from Ganni.

Saga opens old wound

Current Mulberry saga has been a painful reminder of Mike Ashley's Debenhams car crash

3

Advertisement
Current Mulberry saga has been a painful reminder of Mike Ashley’s Debenhams car crashCredit: Alamy

THE MULBERRY saga has been a painful reminder for Mike Ashley of his car crash at Debenhams.

His £180million stake was wiped out when the store hit the wall after repeatedly turning down his overtures. Even in administration it snubbed him.

I went to a jumble sale & hit the jackpot – I left with a Mulberry bag for 30 PENCE, and two sacks of clothes for a quid

Alongside its takeover approach, Frasers Group said yesterday as it made a play for Mulberry: “Frasers will not accept another Debenhams situation where a perfectly viable business is run into administration.”

At Debenhams, Mr Ashley offered the department store a loan lifeline, but only with hefty conditions.

Advertisement

It appears Mulberry is from the same playbook.

He may just want better terms for Mulberry bags in Flannels and House of Fraser shops.

Aston on the kids

SPORTS car-maker Aston Martin shed almost a quarter of its value yesterday after issuing another profit warning.

Advertisement

The brand, favoured by James Bond, said it would make 1,000 fewer cars this year because of supply chain snags.

The warning came as its losses hit £216.7million, up from £142.2million last year.

In further woes for the car industry, Vauxhall owner Stellantis slashed its profit margin forecasts for next year.

eBay fee on sales ditched

eBay is set to scrap fees for sellers in a bid to compete with Facebook Marketplace, Vinted and Depop

3

Advertisement
eBay is set to scrap fees for sellers in a bid to compete with Facebook Marketplace, Vinted and DepopCredit: Alamy

EBAY is scrapping fees for sellers on all items from today so users keep the cash they make from flogging their unwanted goods.

Typically selling an item for £20 would cost £3 in fees and charges per sale on eBay.

The online marketplace is reacting to competition from Facebook Marketplace, Vinted and Depop in a bid to boost revenues.

Research reveals Brits have about 294million unused items lying about their homes, which could generate £9billion.

Advertisement

Half of households have between £50 and £300 of unused items ready to sell, with the most common being clothes, DVDs and tech items.

Kirsty Keoghan, boss of ebay UK, said: “The average household is sitting on money from items they aren’t using.”

eBay has introduced AI tech to help sellers write product descriptions and remove messy backgrounds from product photos.

A tonic for LSE

Advertisement

A PROTEIN powder and vitamins business founded by a former scaffolder is giving the London Stock Exchange a much-needed boost.

Applied Nutrition, set up by Thomas Ryder in 2014, confirmed yesterday plans for a flotation that will value it at £500million.

Ordinary investors will also be able to invest in the listing via a share offer through broker Retailbook.

Last year Applied Nutrition made £86million in revenue.

Advertisement

Mr Ryder said: “We are only scratching the surface of our growth opportunity.”

REA moving on

AUSTRALIA’S REA GROUP has dropped its pursuit of Rightmove after the UK property website rejected a fourth £6.2billion offer.

REA said that it was “disappointed” that Rightmove did not give it extra time ahead of a bid deadline of yesterday, which it said “impeded our ability to make a firm offer”.

Rightmove said REA’s offer was still “unattractive”.

Advertisement

Shares in Rightmove fell by 7.6 per cent to 617.40.

REA Group is majority-owned by News Corp, which also owns The Sun.


HOUSE prices have climbed at the fastest rate in two years.

They were 3.2 per cent higher last month compared with last year, said Nationwide.

Advertisement

Prices rose by 0.7 per cent on the previous month, taking the average property value to £266,094.

Source link

Continue Reading

CryptoCurrency

Trump’s call for a bitcoin strategic reserve is a very bad idea

Published

on


Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The writer is chief executive of Investment Management Associates and author of several books including Soul in the Game — The Art of a Meaningful Life

Advertisement

Politics in the US has turned into one of our biggest sports. Politics has also turned us tribal — we want to win at any cost. Most importantly, we get so engrossed in the sport that we don’t realise that our future — and the future of our children — is the ball we are playing with.

At the end of July, Donald Trump called for the US to be “crypto capital of the planet” and a “bitcoin superpower”. As part of that, he promised to build a bitcoin strategic reserve. I understand why Trump is doing this; he is a politician and support for cryptocurrency means endorsements from crypto bros.

Who knows whether any policy idea offered as a campaign promise would become a reality if he is re-elected to the White House? But if this one did, it would be dangerous for the US. It is not a game where tribal support should override common sense. Let me explain why.

Bitcoin promotion by the White House would chip away at the status of the dollar at a time when sentiment towards the currency is likely to be tested.

Advertisement

Money is more than just green paper with the faces of dead presidents. There are many ways to define it. One way to look at it is as a claim on a country’s productive power and assets, reflecting the value of a nation’s economic output.

Another way to look at money is as a story. It’s a narrative told through everyday actions such as going to the grocery store and trading dollar bills for milk, eggs and doughnuts. As a society, we believe in the story of the intrinsic value of currency. This mass belief is incredibly important for society’s wellbeing.

A reserve currency is a global story. Many people in many countries, who may or may not have visited the US or done business with it, bought into the story that it was a democracy and that its capitalist, free-market economy made it the strongest in the world. And hey, we were responsible with our finances — our debt was manageable, and though we ran budget deficits, they were not huge.

No longer. Today our $27tn economy has $35tn in debt. We collect $4.4tn in taxes, but we spend $6.3tn — we’re running a 5.6 per cent budget deficit. Already, our finances don’t inspire a lot of confidence in the dollar. As we print more dollars every year to finance our growing budget deficits, the dollar story of an all-mighty reserve currency is losing its lustre.

Advertisement

Anyone who is paying attention is already starting to question the trajectory of our finances as well as the state of our political system. We used to have the undisputed reserve currency because we were great on both an absolute and a relative basis. Today, for some, we are just the best alternative, not because we are so awesome but because we are a less-dirty shirt in the old laundry basket.

This brings us to Trump’s rhetoric about wanting the US to build bitcoin strategic reserves. If he’s elected, this governmental policy would change bitcoin’s story, legitimising it and boosting the case to use it as reserve currency.

Bitcoin is not controlled by anyone, including the US government. We cannot print more of it to finance student or medical debt forgiveness, help out with first-time buyer downpayments, or deliver tax cuts when we are running huge budget deficits. Nor can our politicians print more of it to finance their campaign promises that we as a country cannot afford, just to buy themselves more votes. Yet bitcoin, just like gold, looks shinier with every empty campaign promise and every trillion dollars we add to our debt. What will happen if strangers fall in love with another story that is not green and doesn’t have pictures of the US presidents?

Well, the dollar is very unlikely to be replaced as the dominant reserve currency by an alternative any time soon given its role in trade and the global financial system. But it is being increasingly challenged by both fiat and digital currencies. This is not just a question of the economic fundamentals; other countries are diversifying their reserve holdings of currencies.

In such an environment, the US president and presidential candidates should be the dollar’s biggest salespeople rather than supporting an alternative. The bitcoin story should not be promoted — it should not even be accepted as a form of donation to candidates for the position of US president. Bitcoin is not going to make America great. What will help this country continue to be great is getting our debt and deficits under our control.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

CryptoCurrency

Coinbase to add proof of reserves to Bitcoin wrapper cbBTC

Published

on

Coinbase to add proof of reserves to Bitcoin wrapper cbBTC


Adding proof of reserves will head off concerns about Coinbase’s perceived lack of transparency.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

CryptoCurrency

Debunking the 'Binance manipulator' theory: 3 reasons why the allegation falls short

Published

on

Debunking the 'Binance manipulator' theory: 3 reasons why the allegation falls short


Conspiracy theories about market manipulation run rampant in crypto social media, but the accusations of a “Binance manipulator” are pretty easy to debunk. 



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com