Politics
Will Prescott: Why Australia’s centre-right is having an identity crisis
William Prescott is a researcher at Bright Blue.
Last week, the National Party Leader, David Littleproud, announced he was withdrawing his Party from its longstanding coalition with Australia’s main centre-right party, the Liberals, for the second time since last year’s disastrous election loss. With the Australian centre-right parties now divided and losing ground and under siege from both their left and right, the only winner is Prime Minister Anthony Albanese’s Labor Party.
Since its unexpectedly large defeat at last May’s federal election, the Coalition has struggled to overcome the centre-right’s deep structural problems. Reduced to just 43 seats in the 150-member House of Representatives, the Coalition parties were all but wiped out in the major cities that most Australians call home. However, it held on more strongly in rural areas, with the more conservative, country-based National Party holding onto all of its 15 lower-house seats.
The increased relative strength of the National Party, which suddenly found itself holding more than a third of the Coalition’s total 43 seats, compared to just over a quarter after the 2022 election, immediately made itself felt. Amidst fears that the Liberals would shift to the left to win back former heartland inner-city seats, the Nationals announced in late May 2025 that they would not renew the Coalition agreement.
While the blowback was considerable, and the Nationals returned to the Coalition just over a week later, the underlying tensions remained. Ultimately, at least on the climate issue, the Nationals got their way in November last year, when Liberal Leader Sussan Ley officially ditched her Party’s 2050 net zero target.
More recently, the Nationals’ intransigence arises from a fear that their vote share is being increasingly cannibalised by Pauline Hanson’s right-populist One Nation party. An on-and-off-again feature of the Australian political landscape, Hanson’s core platform, which has barely changed since her political emergence in the mid-1990s, centres around drastically reducing immigration and a hostility to multiculturalism.
Concerningly, from a centre-right perspective, One Nation has surpassed the now-dissolved Coalition in opinion polls. According to a January 2026 Newspoll — generally considered the most trustworthy Australian pollster — One Nation’s vote share stood at 22 per cent, just ahead of the Coalition’s lamentable 21 per cent. This is up from just 6.4 per cent of the vote at last year’s election.
Especially worryingly for the Nationals, the evidence suggests that One Nation’s support is most concentrated in the same regional and rural areas that are home to many of the Coalition’s surviving MPs and Senators. Reflecting Hanson’s potential appeal to disaffected rural voters, the maverick former Nationals Leader, Barnaby Joyce — deposed by Littleproud in May 2022 — defected to One Nation in December last year out of frustration at not being reappointed to the frontbench.
Matters came to a head on Thursday last week, when, following a row over post-Bondi hate speech laws, Littleproud declared the Coalition was “untenable” so long as Ley, who has been in post since replacing Peter Dutton after last year’s election loss, remains Liberal Leader. Although the immediate crisis is not of her making, it looks set prove the final straw for Ley, who now faces an imminent leadership challenge amid poll ratings that have been dismal for some time.
Unfortunately, there is no easy road back for the embattled former Coalition parties. While pivoting to the right on immigration, cultural, and climate issues may, in the short term, help to reunite the Coalition and reclaim ground from One Nation, it will do nothing to help regain the more socially liberal urban seats it needs to unseat Labor, and which it has been losing for some time.
Between the 2019 and 2022 elections, for example, the Liberals lost seven of their former heartland seats to the socially and economically liberal ‘teal’ independents. Among the seats lost were those held by former Prime Ministers Sir Robert Menzies and Tony Abbott, as well as former Treasurer Josh Frydenberg. The only Liberal who managed to recover a teal seat at the last election was the moderate and openly gay Tim Wilson.
Amidst this centre-right infighting, the only true victor is Albanese. Despite a modest legislative record since taking office in 2022, a humiliating constitutional referendum defeat, an ongoing cost-of-living crisis and, most recently, a bungled response to the Bondi beach shootings, the absence of a viable opponent means he continues to enjoy a dominant electoral position. While, according to the latest Newspoll, Labor’s primary vote sits at a lacklustre 32 per cent, it now leads the two-party preferred vote 55 per cent to 45 per cent — Australia’s compulsory preferential voting system means this is the more significant gauge of political fortunes. Indeed, at the last election, it secured a landslide election victory with just 34.6 per cent of the primary vote.
While Ley’s likely imminent overthrow may well pave the way for the Coalition’s restoration, it won’t solve the centre-right’s identity crisis. Pivoting to the right may put Liberal-National tensions on ice, but it will make it virtually impossible to win back the cities and, by extension, government. Pivoting to the centre, however, may help to regain the cities but risks entrenching the Liberal-National divide. Until the centre-right can unite around a compelling vision that appeals to both town and country, The Lodge will remain Albanese’s for the keeping.
Readers will probably be aware that literally as you read this, the Scottish Government is in court trying to defend its policy of letting male murderers be housed in women’s prisons by arguing that the Equality Act 2010 (as ruled on by the Supreme Court in the For Women Scotland case) is incompatible with the Human Rights Act 1998, implementing the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (commonly referred to as the ECHR).
But this article isn’t about that case.
Because today the Court Of Session issued an unrelated judgment that an entirely different piece of Scottish law is incompatible with the ECHR.
Wings readers have been following the deeply troubling case of Mark Hirst since 2021. Mark was arrested in 2020 on ludicrous charges involving a tweet constituting an alleged “breach of the peace” against the anonymous complainers who’d made false allegations of sexual assault against Alex Salmond, who’d been cleared on all counts at the High Court earlier the same year.
Seven months later Mark’s trial collapsed at Jedburgh Sheriff Court with the sheriff ruling there was no case to answer. Later that year he commenced proceedings to sue the Lord Advocate for malicious prosecution, and today – a disgraceful four years and seven months later – those proceedings reached their conclusion.
Put simply, judge Lord Lake concluded that Mark DID have grounds for a claim of malicious prosecution against the Lord Advocate – Scotland’s most senior law official, head of the Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service but controversially also a minister in the Scottish Government – but that he was obliged to dismiss the claim because the Criminal Procedure (Scotland) Act 1995, (section 170) grants prosecutors total immunity, because Mark had not been imprisoned.
Lord Lake found that this conflict in law breached Mark’s right to fair treatment.
This might seem like an arcane technical point, but is in fact incredibly serious. Scots law has been ruled flatly incompatible with international human rights law, a situation which cannot possibly be allowed to continue. The CPSA will have to be changed urgently to avoid such grave injustices from happening again, yet it would take a bold gambler to bet on the Scottish Government doing so before May’s general election, or any time soon afterwards.
(It claimed to have no time to support Ash Regan’s bill on prostitution this week, despite it mirroring official SNP policy, but the Parliament did manage to debate a ban on greyhound racing despite there being absolutely no greyhound racing in existence anywhere in Scotland.)
The irony of this extremely rare legal scenario (declarations of incompatibility are vanishingly uncommon, for the obvious reason that most laws are carefully written to avoid them) coming up twice under the same administration, and in connection with the two most shameful episodes in Scottish Government history – the conspiracy, persecution and cover-up against Alex Salmond, and the imposition of violent male criminals on vulnerable women – is hard not to appreciate.
But in a country where nobody – least of all the Crown Office – is accountable for anything, irony appreciation is just about the only thing people have left to hold on to, as Scotland’s justice system dies slowly of shame.
Keir Starmer is in East Sussex delivering a speech on £800 million of funding for deprived areas as part of Labour’s ‘Pride in Place’ scheme. Not going to distract from the scandal he is embroiled in…
You’ve probably heard that family estrangement, particularly between adult children and their parents, is on the rise (though not everyone agrees that this is a strictly modern phenomenon).
In these cases, people often choose to go “no-contact”, meaning they don’t communicate with the estranged family member at all.
But a perhaps uncountable number of adults are choosing “low-contact”, a kind of “gentler” estrangement, to help manage family schisms too.
What does “going low-contact” mean?
Per ABC News, going low contact “refers to maintaining limited or controlled communication with family members”.
In a Reddit post shared to r/raisedbynarcissists, for instance, commenters said that they use tools like “grey rocking” and giving their family members an “information diet” (i.e., not telling them information they think they won’t react well to) to set some boundaries.
Others started slowly phasing out their family members’ phone calls and cut down on visits significantly.
“My sister [has gone] low contact with our dad. She does three visits a year… The fewer times she comes, the higher the likelihood that two-thirds of the time will be reasonable. She also doesn’t do phone calls,” one Redditor wrote.
The actual terms depend on the person, but the general point – reducing contact with family members, and/or being less present, open, and vulnerable when there – seems consistent.
Why might someone go low-contact?
Speaking to ABC News, Catriona Davis-McCabe, President of the Australian Psychological Society, said: “Sometimes it’s used when people are trying to establish clear boundaries between them and their family, or potentially, they could be trying to protect themselves from harm that they perceive is happening because of their family”.
And licenced clinical social worker Edie Stark wrote that it often comes from years of repeated, and failed, attempts to “repair, tolerate, or minimise hurtful dynamics”.
Often, the person going no-contact feels there is no way for their boundaries to be respected by the family member, she added.
Perhaps they feel they undermine their parenting decisions, show up without warning or invitation, pressure or guilt-trip you into doing things you don’t want to do, or make passive-aggressive comments.
Emotional abuse, substance abuse, violence, a lack of safety, and mismatched values can also come into play.
It is rare, Dr Davis-Mcabe said, for the decision to be taken lightly: “It often involves weighing up the benefits of self-protection against the costs of severing ties, and it takes a considerable amount of reflection.”
What should I do if someone has gone low-contact with me?
Speaking to HuffPost UK previously, Dorcy Pruter, the founder of the Conscious Co-Parenting Institute, said that before full-on estrangement, “There are often early signs of withdrawal, short or transactional conversations, and emotional distance, but many parents miss them because they interpret that distance as rudeness or ingratitude, rather than disconnection”.
It is key, at this point, to reflect before acting in defence, she added.
Consider trying to “heal [your] own wounds, take radical responsibility, and become safe for their child again, even if that child never returns.
“I often tell my clients that reconnection isn’t about changing your child’s mind. It’s about transforming your own heart.”
An inquiry into the deaths of at least 30 people who drowned while trying to cross the English Channel in 2021 has found that emergency services could have prevented the deaths.
On November 24, 2021, the dinghy they were travelling on started to fill with water and capsized. To date, it is the deadliest small boat disaster on record in the English Channel.
Only two of the people on board survived. Emergency services found them nearly 12 hours after they called for help.
In total, authorities found 27 bodies and confirmed another four people were missing.
Channel crossing: a damning inquiry.
The inquiry found that staff numbers across the national network at HM Coastguard were “above what was required”. However, the recommended seasonal staffing at MRCC Dover is three operational staff for search and rescue. Importantly, this number “was not satisfied”. The inquiry found:
The only fully qualified staff member working in the search and rescue team at MRCC Dover that night was the Search and Rescue Mission Co-ordinator (SMC). The two others in the SMC’s team that night were trainees: one was partially qualified but deemed to be operational, and the other was non operational.
Shockingly, these staffing pressures meant that the SMC was unable to take a break. This:
unsurprisingly left him feeling overwhelmed and fatigued. The short staffing also resulted in an absence of appropriate supervision for the non-operational trainee, who was called on to undertake operational tasks.
Moreover, both Border Force Maritime and the RNLI lacked sufficient resources to deal with the situation.
Despite a seemingly healthy number of surface assets available on the night of 23 to 24 November 2021, HM Coastguard and Border Force were reluctant to deploy more than one, as this would have reduced the availability of an already insufficient number of assets on the following day.
A surveillance aircraft that should have provided “critical intelligence” also did not launch due to poor weather. Of course, there was no contingency plan.
Additionally, authorities missed calls and texts from the boat, or did not follow them up. This, combined with the widely held belief that the people on the boat were exaggerating their distress, meant that the coastguard underestimated the urgency of the situation.
To make matters worse, HM Coastguard did not inform the helicopter searching the area to look for people in the water. The report states:
There were problems with the search undertaken by the helicopter R163. Based on the drift analyses commissioned by the MAIB, it is likely that the area covered by R163’s search contained the swamped small boat. However, its search was not effective for locating a swamped small boat or people in the water. R163 was not tasked to incident ‘Charlie’ specifically and was not informed by HM Coastguard that it was to locate a sinking small boat or people in the water. The captain of R163 told the Inquiry that if he had been informed that there were people in the water, “that does change things”. Instead, R163 was tasked to look for the multiple small boats that were believed to be in a similar area.
Ultimately, authorities and emergency services could have prevented all of the deaths. The inquiry report concludes:
As the analysis makes clear, the flaws in HM Coastguard’s decision-making were systemic. In particular they are attributable to the inordinate pressure on HM Coastguard staff at MRCC Dover handling search and rescue for small boats, the absence of effective supervision of those staff, the limitations of the remote working model to assist them, and the belief which had developed among HM Coastguard personnel that callers from small boats regularly exaggerated their level of distress.
This article contains graphic details of rape and sexual assault.
The latest tranche of Epstein documents have provided further evidence that he was not only a vile paedophile, he was also an appalling racist. We’ve previously covered Epstein’s sickening fantasies about using the supposedly “superior gene pool” of himself and the children he raped to create a “super-race”.
However, the new files provide further evidence of his eugenicist views. In an email to linguist and political dissident Noam Chomsky, the now-dead former financier suggested that Black people are less intelligent than others:
The test score gap amongst African-Americans is well documented. 20 years of testing. Many countries. James Watson had some of his private views made public and hence his dismissal from society. He told me that after one sentence he became an un-person. Making things better might require accepting some uncomfortable facts. You told me that.
Epstein – racist views and racist friends
James Watson was a Nobel Prize winner alongside Francis Crick, Maurice Wilkins, and Rosalind Franklin following their discovery of DNA. He was also a horrible racist. He said:
There’s a difference on the average between blacks and whites in IQ tests. I would say the difference is genetic.
Watson described himself as “gloomy” regarding Africa’s prospects due to his claim that:
…all our social policies are based on the fact that their intelligence is the same as ours — whereas all the testing says not really.
Epstein appeared to indicate in another email that he was meeting Watson for breakfast. A white supremacist podcaster called Jean-François Gariépy also says Epstein gave him $25,000.
Epstein was of course a major backer of the world’s leading racist endeavour, the genocidal land theft project that is so-called ‘Israel’. He was a likely Mossad spy and has been pictured wearing an Israeli Genocide Forces sweatshirt. He was also a close friend of former ‘Israeli’ prime minister Ehud Barak. It is alleged Barak was the man who Virginia Giuffre alleged raped her “more savagely than anyone had before”.
Former ‘Israeli’ PM bemoans “quality” of African and Arab people
Now, in a newly released audio recording, Barak can be heard in conversation with Epstein. Adding an extra layer of racism to his already racist desire to have new arrivals to ‘Israel’ steal Palestinian land, Barak talks of controlling the “quality” of these aspiring land thieves. He says:
…we can control the quality much more effectively than our ancestors, or the founding fathers of Israel, could deal with the waves. [It] was a kind of salvation wave from North Africa, from the Arabs, from wherever.
They took whatever came, just to save people. Now we can be selective.
Note the use of “whatever”, rather than “whoever”, as if Black and Arab people are just convenient objects to pad out the settler-colony’s demographics. Rather than what he clearly sees as sub-standard material, the Nazi instead wants another “one million Russians”.
A number similar to that came to invade historic Palestine in the immediate aftermath of the Soviet Union’s collapse. Given it’s a conversation with a child rapist, Barak – being the sickening creep he is – inevitably turns the conversation in a smutty direction, saying:
I think that many will prefer it to be Belorussians [who arrive]. Many young, handsome girls will come. Tall, thin.
This is the only moment Epstein can be heard in the recording, letting out a chuckle.
Zionism is a fundamentally racist ideology
Of course, this all makes sense, given Zionism is a fundamentally racist project at its core. It grants one ethnic group exclusive rights to land they have no claim on, as they exterminate the native inhabitants. The racism which Barak espouses has just been an additional stain on top of that underlying bigotry.
Historian Avi Shlaim has recounted his early experiences of racism as an Arab Jew upon his family’s arrival from Iraq. Ethiopian Jews who arrived in the Zionist pseudo-state were sterilised, so they couldn’t outnumber the preferred white population. Arab people in ‘Israel’ are denied the same provision of services as their Jewish counterparts, including access to bomb shelters.
It’s not only racism that the Zionist entity shares with Epstein. It is also a vehicle for mass sexual abuse. Paedophiles have used the apartheid colony as a means of evading justice elsewhere. The most senior figures in the Zionist government have refrained from deporting such individuals.
Palestinian children are routinely sexually assaulted in the brutal prison system run by the terrorists in West Jerusalem. Children are “hit or touched on the genitals”, with 69% being strip searched.
Palestinians have recounted systematic sexual abuse in the ‘Israeli’ system of torture camps. Those kidnapped describe being raped with dogs, iron bars and batons. Tamer Qarmut was kidnapped from Gaza in November 2023. He described his abuse:
He [the guard[ shoved a wooden stick up my anus, left it there for about a minute, and pulled it out. Then he shoved it back in, even harder, and I screamed at the top of my lungs. After a minute, he pulled the stick out again, told me to open my mouth, pushed the stick into my mouth and forced me to lick it.
Knesset members have defended the right to rape kidnapped Palestinians. They even staged a violent protest at a torture centre when it appeared rapists may be held to account for their crimes.
The Zionist entity is effectively Epstein in ‘state’ form. A project of massive racism, violence and sexual abuse, allowed to continue its crimes way beyond the time it should have been held to account.
Featured image via the Canary
Justin Bieber certainly turned heads at the recent Grammy Awards when he performed in nothing but his satin boxers – but it turns out this was actually a subtle marketing opportunity.
During a very stripped-back performance of Yukon on Sunday night, the Canadian star took to the stage in just lavender boxer shorts and socks, debuting a rumoured new tattoo in honour of his wife Hailey in the process.
It now looks like Justin – who was nominated for four gongs at the ceremony – was also using his return to the Grammys stage to market his own fashion brand, Skylrk, as it’s since been pointed out that the brand’s double-blob logo was visible on the boxers, embroidered in crystal patches.
John Salangsang/Shutterstock
Justin launched Skylrk in July last year, offering comfort-oriented pieces, including $250 (£185) pleated jeans, $200 (£148) sunglasses and $80 (£60) slides.
Of course, the As Long As You Love Me singer is no stranger to overseeing his own own clothing label – in 2018 he co-launched his former venture, Drew House, before finally pulling out of the brand in April 2025 after months of rumoured in-fighting and conflicts with the co-owner, Ryan Good. Months later, he started Skylrk, and has since been sharing prototypes and designs on his social media pages.
Justin’s decision to wear just his brand’s underwear was apparently one he made right at the last minute.
During a recent interview with Rolling Stone, the Grammys’ executive producer explained that, unlike most artists, Justin hadn’t heavily pre-planned his look days before the performance.
“When we had reached out to him about his creative, he was just like, ‘I’m just going to get on stage and sing’,” producer Ben Winston said.
He also revealed that Justin barely used his allotted time to rehearse and left after around 15 minutes of his 90-minute slot, happy with the results.
“It was all him. It was a career-defining moment for him. It was so different to what we’ve seen over the years,” Winston added.
Justin’s next major performance will be in April, as he headlines Coachella – and we wonder if he’ll debut another piece from the Skylrk line.
Reform UK and its leader Nigel Farage are no party of the people. Their emerging Epstein links show how their relationships with unaccountable transnational ruling elites let them play politics on easy mode. What has changed is that we’re starting to see more and more receipts.
If Farage’s outfit knows one thing it is money. A privately-educated banker himself, Farage has always played the tweed populist while making money moves behind the scenes. For example, this virulent critic of Muslims and Islam was in the Middle East last week ago courting UAE billionaire’s for donations.
But there is more. Property tycoon billionaire and Reform treasurer Nick Candy has now been revealed as an associate of late child-rapist, Zionist, and fascist Jeffrey Epstein.
Reform have an Epstein problem
As Skwawkbox reported recently, the Epstein files name Candy in relation to Epstein. There was even an email talking about Candy’s property firm selling a London flat for Epstein.
The emails appear to show, among other things, that Epstein was a fan of Candy, that Candy and Epstein appear to have swapped phone numbers through a third party, spoke directly – and that disgraced Labour grandee Peter Mandelson was also in the mix.
You should read the full report here.
A former Tory donor, Candy shifted to Reform UK in 2024 and now serves as their treasurer. He even promised the party a massive sum to support their bid for office. Even far-right tech baron Elon Musk – another Epstein associate – approved of the move.
Candy’s job is to elicit money for the nativist party whose officials have spent the last week dodging questions on Epstein. One even threatened to storm out of a TV interview when pushed on the party’s connections to Epstein.
Needless to say the full extent of Candy’s – and his financial dealings – with Epstein are still hazy. Yet the pair’s apparently rather collegiate relationship tells a story.
Questions to answer
Tax expert and economist Richard Murphy drew out some of the contradictions in the Reform UK/Epstein relationship.
Murphy wrote on 5 February:
In December 2024, Candy announced that he had quit the Conservatives and would “become the treasurer for Reform UK”. He then joined Nigel Farage and Elon Musk at a strategy meeting at Donald Trump’s Florida mansion, the latter two of whom also appear in the Epstein files.
Adding:
The trio’s names all appear in a tranche of three million documents released by the US Department of Justice last Friday
Murphy rightly noted:
Appearing in the Epstein files is not an indication of wrongdoing.
But as he pointed out questions remained. And that no Reform MP seemed to have attended the debate on Epstein and Mandelson on 4 February:
That is true, but questions still need to be asked about this and about why, apparently, no Reform MP thought it appropriate to be in the Commons yesterday. Why could that be?
But what are we to make of it all? Because treating Epstein as an aberration, rather than a product or expression of a system, rather misses the point.
Global transnational elites
Epstein was many things. And by all credible accounts every single one of those things was reprehensible. He was a prolific (and prolifically self-serving) operator in international affairs: connector, deal-maker, and schmoozer. Epstein was one figure in an amoral network of transnational elites, dealing in information and brokering power.
He traded in what he and his vile cohorts considered nothing more than property, be it human (his sex-trafficked victims seem to be regularly sidelined in all this) or inanimate. His own politics were clearly of the furthest right.
Ultimately men like these – and they are overwhelmingly men – want to make a world in their own image. With that in mind organisations like Reform UK – led by people with bottomless reserves of base viciousness, bigotry and ambition – are going to have a profound appeal for powerful, hyper-rich grotesques like Epstein.
The core truth is Reform UK aren’t popular, they’re just connected. They’re the electoral wing of a propertied global cartel. Underneath the pint-swilling, faux-populist trappings they represent an identifiable set of class interests. Those interests, as it happens, are the same values as tech barons, billionaires, bankers and property tycoons, petro-lords and bought-and-paid-for politicians and abusers whose names are all over Epstein’s gruesome files.
Featured image via the Canary
Piers Corbyn, brother of Jeremy Corbyn, is officially on the ballot for the Your Party Central Executive Committee (CEC) in elections ending 5 January. This is despite Piers’s links to various conspiracy theories.
A pale imitation of his younger brother
Corbyn passed the ballot with 103 votes as an independent yesterday. Since then, people have raised their concerns:
Piers Corbyn is a climate change denier who has been protesting outside refugee hotels alongside fascists of late. The fact that he’s allowed to be in YourParty, nevermind that he has been endorsed for its CEC by 102 London members, is shocking. https://t.co/jZBIpwk87p
— Adam Ramsay (@AdamRamsay) February 4, 2026
Piers has a long history of controversial beliefs, having been very active in the anti-vax movement, leading to his arrest on several occasions. He didn’t stop there, going on to harass NHS workers, accusing them of murder. He also turned up at a drag story time in Brighton screaming “Your parents were straight!”
To be fair, some of the above is kind of tame compared to the time Piers was arrested on suspicion of inciting arson.
Observers have also clocked Piers holding signs saying ‘Stop the Boats’ outside of migrant hotels:
🇬🇧🚨 PIERS CORBYN, brother of JEREMY CORBYN, has arrived at the Bell MIGRANT Hotel in Epping to offer his support.
“I’m here to support the campaign to close this hotel. The boats should be STOPPED. The government is using this CRISIS to bring in DIGITAL ID. We don’t need… https://t.co/536Yj9lkek pic.twitter.com/O7rqq12SVK
— VoxPopuli (@vpopulimedia) August 8, 2025
Just yesterday, he tweeted this:
AND now:
Zach Polanski the conman.
Fact: Man-Made ClimateChange does Not Exist – Download https://t.co/qXisckHYmJ https://t.co/OsYEcRbTUO pic.twitter.com/xulHiKnylA— Piers Corbyn (@Piers_Corbyn) February 3, 2026
Do you see what we’re getting at here?
Is this really who Your Party wants?
The presence of Piers on the ballot poses a significant question for Your Party members.
Will the membership reject his toxic brand of conspiracy-led politics?
Or, will Piers find a powerful new platform for his controversial views?
It all feels a bit ‘nepo sibling’ to us.
Featured image via Daily Record
Looks like he’s seen a ghost…
The post The Mandelson scandal has exploded the myth of McSweeney appeared first on spiked.
Wings Over Scotland | A Stitch In Timing
France vs Ireland live: Latest score and updates as title hopefuls collide in huge Six Nations opener
Beyond the lakehouse: Fundamental’s NEXUS bypasses manual ETL with a native foundation model for tabular data
-
Crypto World6 days agoSmart energy pays enters the US market, targeting scalable financial infrastructure
-
Crypto World7 days agoSoftware stocks enter bear market on AI disruption fear with ServiceNow plunging 10%
-
Politics6 days agoWhy is the NHS registering babies as ‘theybies’?
-
Crypto World7 days agoAdam Back says Liquid BTC is collateralized after dashboard problem
-
Video3 days agoWhen Money Enters #motivation #mindset #selfimprovement
-
Fashion6 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Tech1 day agoWikipedia volunteers spent years cataloging AI tells. Now there’s a plugin to avoid them.
-
NewsBeat6 days agoDonald Trump Criticises Keir Starmer Over China Discussions
-
Politics3 days agoSky News Presenter Criticises Lord Mandelson As Greedy And Duplicitous
-
Crypto World5 days agoU.S. government enters partial shutdown, here’s how it impacts bitcoin and ether
-
Sports5 days agoSinner battles Australian Open heat to enter last 16, injured Osaka pulls out
-
Crypto World5 days agoBitcoin Drops Below $80K, But New Buyers are Entering the Market
-
Crypto World3 days agoMarket Analysis: GBP/USD Retreats From Highs As EUR/GBP Enters Holding Pattern
-
Crypto World6 days agoKuCoin CEO on MiCA, Europe entering new era of compliance
-
Business6 days ago
Entergy declares quarterly dividend of $0.64 per share
-
NewsBeat5 hours agoStill time to enter Bolton News’ Best Hairdresser 2026 competition
-
Sports3 days agoShannon Birchard enters Canadian curling history with sixth Scotties title
-
NewsBeat2 days agoUS-brokered Russia-Ukraine talks are resuming this week
-
NewsBeat3 days agoGAME to close all standalone stores in the UK after it enters administration
-
Crypto World2 days agoRussia’s Largest Bitcoin Miner BitRiver Enters Bankruptcy Proceedings: Report