It’s easy to forget that Michael Mann‘s 2006 feature film adaptation of the 1980s crime television series Miami Vice was considered a major disappointment upon release. In the 20 years since Colin Farrell and Jamie Foxx inhabited the roles of Crockett and Tubbs, the film’s cult status has grown into a beloved critical darling that has inspired a massive fanbase. At long last, a new generation is set to take another crack at this source material, with Top Gun: Maverick‘s Joseph Kosinski at the helm and Austin Butler and Oscar-winner Michael B. Jordan in the starring roles.

Set up at Universal Pictures with Nightcrawler‘s Dan Gilroy behind the page, Miami Vice ’85 is scheduled for a May 19, 2028, theatrical release. It’s been a long journey to finally get a re-imagining of Miami Vice on the screen again. Kosinski and his team have a tall task ahead of them, but Universal has curated the perfect crew for this score.

‘Top Gun: Maverick’s Joseph Kosinski Has Big Plans for Austin Butler and Michael B. Jordan’s ‘Miami Vice ’85’

A reboot of Miami Vice felt too good to be true, but the recent announcement that Joseph Kosinski will likely not return to direct Top Gun 3 indicates that he is fully committed to bringing Miami Vice ’85 into existence. We received our first glimpse of the film through loose plot details shared by Variety, which promises to be an exploration of the glamour and corruption of Miami in the mid-1980s, hence the title (Mann’s film was contemporary, making it an insightful time capsule of 2006 fashion and technology). The original TV series influenced the style and culture of the 1980s, and Kosinski’s film hopes to tap into that evergreen audience thirst for the decade’s glossy aesthetic.

After being rumored last fall, Austin Butler and Sinners‘ Michael B. Jordan, have been confirmed to play the Miami narcotics officers. Elsewhere, Butler is allegedly following Michael Mann to a follow-up to one of his own films, Heat 2. Glen Powell was initially eyed to play Crockett, which would’ve reunited him with his Top Gun: Maverick director.

Is That Tom Cruise ‘Miami Vice ’85’ Casting Rumor True?

Carlos Tischler/EyePix/INSTARimages

The most enticing rumor during the film’s development is the potential casting of Tom Cruise as the villain opposite Jordan and Butler. So far, there is no hard evidence corroborating this claim circulating online, but considering Cruise’s past partnerships with Kosinski in Oblivion and Top Gun: Maverick, as well as his pursuit of more challenging, against-type roles in a post-Mission: Impossible world, the casting wouldn’t be a shocking turn of events. This would be Cruise’s first villainous role since Collateral, coincidentally directed by Michael Mann. Not only would this expand Cruise’s horizons as an actor, but his rumored role in Miami Vice ’85 could be a passing of the baton from the past generation’s premier leading man to the faces of the next generation.

Universal Studios Continues To Take Big Creative Swings

“Premium large format” is a phrase that studios love to hear, as IMAX, Dolby, and other high-end exhibition models have proven to boost box office numbers and maintain a film’s lifespan in theaters. Variety also reported that Miami Vice ’85 will be shot for IMAX screens, optimizing the premium traits of the format. Kosinski has plenty of experience behind IMAX cameras as the director of Top Gun: Maverick and last year’s F1. The addition of IMAX photography and exhibition suggests that Universal is treating the upcoming movie as a marquee event. Along with their 2026 lineup, which includes Disclosure Day and The Odyssey, the studio has shown interest in platforming auteur voices in big-budget, star-driven projects, balanced by their reliable box office juggernauts in Illumination and Dreamworks animated movies.

Michael B. Jordan and Austin Butler Are Perfect for ‘Miami Vice ’85’

Image via NBC

Miami Vice ’85 sees its key principal creative artists entering this exciting project at the ideal time in their careers. Jordan, newly minted in the rarefied class of box office stars with critical adoration, could turn this film with an already passionate pre-existing audience into another cultural event like Sinners. Butler’s robust filmography and mindset of working with visionary directors continues with Miami Vice ’85, a reboot that nonetheless feels fresh relative to the modern landscape. Years since Elvis, he is due to carry an event movie on the strength of his name. The film was originally slated for an August 6, 2027 release, with Universal also pushing the date for its fourth installment in the Mummy franchise.

As of April 2026, the rest of the plot details, production notes, and cast of Miami Vice ’85 have remained under wraps. In an era where information spreads rapidly and constantly, the more mystery, the better. Most people don’t need to be sold on a Miami Vice reboot, let alone a two-hander starring Michael B. Jordan and Austin Butler. Let us be surprised, no matter how long we have to wait.

If you’re a Prime Video subscriber, it’s hard to look past one show as the must-watch title on the streamer at the moment. After a shaky fourth season that received mixed reviews from most critics and audiences, The Boys returned to form with an explosive Season 5 opener early last month. Since then, weekly releases have seen Karl Urban‘s Billy Butcher, Jack Quaid‘s Hughie Campbell, and more face a world dominated by Antony Starr‘s Homelander as twists and turns keep many millions of viewers gripped.

Called “one of the show’s best” seasons in Nate Richard‘s review for Collider, the final outing in Eric Kripke‘s superhero series is certainly a must-watch right now. However, it isn’t the only show proving popular on Prime Video, with an 8-part Dexter replacement quietly continuing its streaming run almost two months after its debut. The show in question is Scarpetta, based on a book series by Patricia Cornwell, which debuted on March 11 and became an instant hit on streaming, topping Amazon’s most-watched series list in its first week.

The show boasts an impressive collection of talent both in front of and behind the screen, with veteran director David Gordon Green working on a trio of Season 1 episodes. The show’s ensemble includes Nicole Kidman, Jamie Lee Curtis, Bobby Cannavale, Ariana DeBose, and Simon Baker, among many other notable faces. After its continued streaming success, Scarpetta has now hit an impressive new milestone. At the time of writing, the series has passed 50 days on the Prime Video streaming charts, as per FlixPatrol.

Nicole Kidman Is Also Dominating Another Streamer

Trust one of Hollywood’s best to simultaneously dominate two of the world’s biggest streaming platforms. As Scarpetta hits this latest milestone, Kidman’s other new project, the Apple TV hit Margo’s Got Money Troubles, continues its run near the top of the charts. Also starring the likes of Elle Fanning, Nick Offerman, and Michelle Pfeiffer, the series has gained impressive reviews from critics, scoring a near-perfect rating of 97% on review aggregator Rotten Tomatoes. Later this year, Kidman will return to a cult favorite as Practical Magic 2 hits theaters, with Kidman and Sandra Bullock reprising their roles as Gillian and Sally Owens.

Scarpetta is available to binge in full on Prime Video. Stay tuned to Collider for more of the latest streaming stories.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

March 11, 2026

Network

Prime Video

Advertisement

Showrunner

Elizabeth Sarnoff

Advertisement

Directors

David Gordon Green, Charlotte Brändström

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Some movies don’t just feel nostalgic. They feel like memory itself. Cameron Crowe’s 2000 film captures fandom, youth, music obsession, and emotional growing pains with a warmth that never tips into sentimentality. It’s a coming-of-age movie, a backstage drama, and a love letter to the kind of rock-and-roll mythology that can completely take over your life when you’re young.

Almost Famous sticks around because of how human it feels. Patrick Fugit (Gone Girl, First Man) is great as William Miller, but the movie is packed with performances that have only grown in stature over time, while Crowe understands that the allure of this world is inseparable from the loneliness inside it, and that tension gives the movie real emotional weight.

Fugit plays 15-year-old William Miller, who lands the opportunity of a lifetime writing for Rolling Stone magazine following touring rock band Stillwater. Set in the 1970s, it’s a perfect representation of the era’s rock culture as it takes viewers on William’s adventures on the road. The story is inspired by Crowe’s own experiences as a teenage journalist, and his work on the film won him an Academy Award for Best Original Screenplay. Almost Famous earned widespread praise from critics too, also nabbing a Golden Globe for Best Motion Picture – Musical or Comedy.

Who Stars in ‘Almost Famous’?

Alongside Fugit, the cast includes Kate Hudson (How to Lose a Guy in 10 Days, Glass Onion: A Knives Out Mystery) as Penny Lane, Billy Crudup (Watchmen, Big Fish) as Russell Hammond, Frances McDormand (Fargo, Three Billboards Outside Ebbing, Missouri) as Elaine Miller, Jason Lee (Vanilla Sky, Chasing Amy) as Jeff Bebe, Zooey Deschanel (Elf, 500 Days of Summer) as Anita Miller, and Philip Seymour Hoffman (Capote, The Master) as Lester Bangs.

One of the best things in Almost Famous is its unforgettable soundtrack, which includes instantly recognizable hits from legends like Led Zeppelin, Elton John, and David Bowie. The soundtrack brilliantly captures the essence of the 1970s rock scene, which enhances the film’s story and provides quite a treat for music lovers. Adding to the thrill, the film also includes original songs performed by the fictional band Stillwater, with “Fever Dog” emerging as a fan favorite.

Almost Famous is streaming now on Pluto.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

September 15, 2000

Runtime

Advertisement

124 minutes

Director

Cameron Crowe

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Taylor Frankie Paul is explaining why she was seen in an embrace with Dakota Mortensen’s mom during the former couple’s custody and protective order hearing.

After a fan Instagram account shared video footage of Taylor hugging Cheyenne Cranford Mortensen inside Salt Lake City’s Third District Courthouse on Thursday, April 30, Taylor provided context via the comments section.

“That was my goodbye to a family my older kids and I loved deeply❤️‍🩹” Taylor, 31, explained. (Taylor and Dakota share 2-year-old son Ever. Taylor shares daughter Indy, 8, and son Ocean, 5, with her ex-husband Tate Paul.)

During the court hearing, a judge issued Taylor and Dakota, 33, protective orders against each other.

Related: Judge Rules on Taylor Frankie Paul and Dakota Mortensen Protective Orders

A judge has issued a big ruling regarding Taylor Frankie Paul and ex Dakota Mortensen’s ongoing legal battle. “This has been a very toxic relationship. It’s beyond the pale in a lot of ways, the toxicity,” a judge said during a protective order hearing on Thursday, April 30, regarding the pair’s custody arrangement. “What I’ve seen […]

Utah Commissioner Russell Minas ordered Taylor and Dakota to stay 100 feet away from each other for a period of three years.

Minas described their relationship as “dysfunctional” as he handed down the orders.

“This has been a very toxic relationship. It’s beyond the pale in a lot of ways, the toxicity,” Minas said on Thursday. “What I’ve seen from the evidence even post [the] last hearing, there seems to be a continuing attraction that they have for each other. … You guys have to figure out a lot here. You have to figure out how to function as coparents.”

“I’m hoping that you’re not people who just thrive on the drama and the conflict,” the judge added. “You’ve got to put your child first and shield the child from this conflict. I’m going to leave the current order in place. I need to think a little bit more about this lifting of supervision. I have mixed feelings about it.”

Dakota was granted temporary custody of Ever in March amid allegations of domestic violence between him and Taylor. Taylor is currently allowed up to eight hours of supervised visitation with the toddler.  There were no changes made to the custody arrangement on Thursday.

Dakota filed for a temporary protective order against Taylor in March amid two police investigations into domestic violence allegations involving the exes. Taylor was granted her own temporary protective order against Dakota in April.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Taylor’s attorney, Eric M. Swinyard, addressed the court hearing via a statement shared with Us Weekly on Thursday.

Advertisement

Related: What to Know About Taylor Frankie Paul and Ex Dakota’s Custody Battle

The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives stars Taylor Frankie Paul and Dakota Mortensen have tried to coparent son Ever since their fall 2024 split. Paul and Mortensen welcomed their first baby together, the MomTok content creator’s third, in March 2024, months before they called it quits. As Paul and Mortensen navigated jointly raising their son, […]

“Today’s hearing was a significant step forward as the Court entered protective orders requiring that Taylor’s ex-partner stays far away from her,” he told Us.

“Taylor was incredibly candid with the Court that she is not perfect and owned her faults, which is in direct contrast to how the other party presented their argument, despite evidence and input from law enforcement that showed otherwise,” Swinyard continued. “Taylor feels solidarity with the many survivors who have endured similar hardships behind closed doors and shared only part of their stories, and she remains grateful for the outpouring of support she continues to receive. She looks forward to continuing to cooperate with the Court to make progress in the custody case.”

There’s a film that has the kind of energy that never really goes out of style. Joe Cornish’s alien invasion thriller is funny, fast, rough around the edges in the best way, and packed with the kind of confidence that makes a cult movie stick around long after its initial release. It takes a familiar genre setup and throws it into a South London housing estate, then lets the characters, the setting, and the film’s chaotic attitude do the rest.

A huge part of what makes Attack the Block work is how naturally it balances tones. The movie is genuinely funny, but it never undercuts the danger. The creatures are properly menacing, the action is scrappy and intense, and the young cast gives the whole thing a lived-in feel that keeps it from ever seeming too polished. You can see why it became such a breakout title for John Boyega. Even before the bigger franchise work came along, he already had the screen presence to anchor something this lively.

Now that it’s streaming free on Pluto, Attack the Block is in a perfect position for rediscovery. It’s still one of the most inventive and entertaining sci-fi movies of its era, and it’s exactly the kind of film that benefits from viewers stumbling onto it and immediately wondering why it isn’t talked about even more.

The cast of the movie includes Boyega (Star Wars: The Force Awakens, They Cloned Tyrone) as Moses, Jodie Whittaker (Doctor Who, Adult Life Skills) as Sam, Alex Esmail (Casualty) as Pest, Franz Drameh (Edge of Tomorrow, Gran Turismo) as Dennis, Leeon Jones (The Intent 2) as Jerome, Simon Howard (Harriet the Spy: Blog Wars) as Biggz, and Nick Frost (Shaun of the Dead, Hot Fuzz) as Ron.

Is ‘Attack the Block’ Any Good?

Collider’s review stated that Attack the Block is a fast, funny, and genuinely great alien invasion movie that flips the genre on its head by making a group of South London teens its heroes. The film starts by asking viewers to follow characters who do something awful, but it wins you over quickly through sharp writing, strong performances, and a ton of energy. Boyega stands out right away as Moses, giving the gang’s leader real presence and making him far more interesting than he first appears.

Attack the Block is streaming now for free on Pluto.

Advertisement

Advertisement

Release Date

May 12, 2011

Runtime

Advertisement

88 minutes

Director

Joe Cornish

Advertisement

Writers

Joe Cornish

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement

Many celebrities have strong opinions about the Met Gala — but some stick to their convictions more than others.

Gwyneth Paltrow was one of the first stars to publicly admit that she didn’t have a great time at the fundraiser for The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s Costume Institute.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

“Do you want me to be honest? … It sucked,” Paltrow told USA Today in 2013. “It seems like it’s the best thing in the world, you always think, ‘Oh, my God, it’s gonna be so glamorous and amazing and you’re going to see all these people,’ and then you get there and it’s so hot and it’s so crowded and everyone’s pushing you.”

The Oscar winner added that it’s “so un-fun,” “boiling,” “too crowded” and she “did not enjoy it at all.” Despite declaring, “I’m never going again,” Paltrow returned to the Met steps in 2017 and 2019.

Scroll through for stars who have admitted they don’t want to be invited back:

The Met Gala is the most fashion-focused red carpet event of the year, but the clothes aren’t the only reason the event is such a success — there’s also a huge potential for hilarious celeb interactions.

The glamorous party brings together stars from the worlds of movies, music, sports, fashion, politics and more, meaning that celebrities who don’t usually run into each other get the chance to chat over drinks at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City.

Though it’s a highlight of Hollywood’s social calendar, it’s tough to score an invite — and even tougher to document what goes on inside. In 2015, attendees reportedly received a notice banning the use of social media during the event. The policy seems to have been relaxed in recent years, but selfies are still generally frowned upon.

Thank You!

You have successfully subscribed.

Advertisement

That hasn’t stopped some celebrities from teaming up for some truly epic mirror shots in the bathroom. In 2017, Kylie Jenner snapped a photo that included her sisters Kim Kardashian and Kendall Jenner as well as Lily Aldridge, Diddy, ASAP Rocky, Brie Larson and more.

In 2014, Beyoncé and her husband, Jay-Z, staged one of the most memorable Met Gala moments of all time when they turned a mishap into something adorable. After the “Hold Up” songstress dropped a ring she was wearing, the “99 Problems” rapper dropped to his knee to pick it up — and pretended to propose again right there on the red carpet.

Keep scrolling for a look back at the funniest celeb interactions at the Met Gala.

By Robert Scucci
| Published 13 seconds ago

The Simpsons is undeniably one of the greatest and most well-known cartoon sitcoms of all time, but the series we celebrate today was almost entirely scrapped by its producers before it even got off the ground. These days, when an animated series launches, it’s fully developed. Character quirks are established right out of the gate, the animation style is locked in, and the entire creative process is a well-oiled machine before a premiere hits the airwaves. The Simpsons, on the other hand, got off to a very rough start when it transitioned from a series of crude shorts on The Tracey Ullman Show to a full-blown animated sitcom.

Rife with continuity errors and wildly inconsistent animation, Season 1 of The Simpsons is a rough showcase of raw potential. It was so raw that the series was nearly canned due to a failure to launch on time, thanks to a disproportionate amount of behind-the-scenes chaos. Character design was all over the place. Barney had blonde hair, Moe and Milhouse had black hair, Smithers was a Black man, Mr. Burns’ office at the Springfield Nuclear Power Plant looked completely different, and, most insane to think about, the episode that was supposed to kick off the entire series, “Some Enchanted Evening,” ended up airing as the season finale because the animation studio they outsourced to botched the job so badly that 70 percent of the episode had to be overhauled.

While the show seemed doomed from the start, we’re fortunate that Matt Groening, James L. Brooks, and Sam Simon stuck to their guns and stuck their necks out for the show that would eventually become the master template for adult animated series for decades to come.

Animation And Continuity Was Tragically Bad

Most long-running animated series go through some growing pains on the animation front, and that’s expected. As more efficient ways to produce a show materialize, animation becomes sharper, smoother, and more fluid.

The same can be said for live-action shows, as better shooting and lighting methods are implemented and budgets are opened up to allow for more sophisticated productions, making later seasons look far superior to earlier ones. 

South Park is an excellent example of animation evolving over time. The show was originally produced in a stop-motion style with construction paper sets and characters. Once Trey Parker and Matt Stone figured out how to produce episodes using computers and editing software, the show’s aesthetic gradually improved into the style we’re familiar with today. That’s just show business, and every animated series, no matter how well-developed before premiering, will evolve visually to some degree.

For The Simpsons, though, it’s comical how inconsistent the animation is in Season 1. The original Simpsons shorts on The Tracey Ullman Show were animated by Klasky Csupo, with the process handled in-house. When The Simpsons was picked up as a series, animation duties were split across multiple studios as a cost-cutting measure because the show was the first of its kind and a massive creative risk for Fox at the time. As a result, character and background layouts were produced in Los Angeles, while coloring and filming were handled by AKOM, a South Korean animation studio.

When “Some Enchanted Evening” came back for test screenings at Gracie Films, James L. Brooks reportedly said, “This is sh*t,” the room cleared out, and the show’s future was suddenly in question. The premiere was delayed by months while the animation was reworked, and had the next completed episode been just as bad, the entire project may have been scrapped. Fortunately, “Bart the Genius” came back looking more refined, with only minor tweaks needed to get it ready for air.

The Christmas special, “Simpsons Roasting on an Open Fire,” which was originally intended to air later in the run, ended up becoming the series premiere, creating a major continuity issue with the family dynamic. In this episode, Homer, down on his luck after losing his Christmas bonus, takes a side gig as a mall Santa and loses his meager paycheck at the dog track. He then adopts the losing greyhound, Santa’s Little Helper, presenting the dog to his family as both a new pet and a Christmas gift.

With the episode order scrambled and most of the season already in the can, we’re asked to ignore the fact that The Simpsons technically begins with the family adopting a dog, only for that dog to barely appear again until Episode 11, “The Crepes of Wrath,” and even then mostly in the background. Had the episodes been completed properly from the start and aired in their intended order, there would have been a clear progression. The Simpson family would have no dog, we’d spend most of a season with them, and then they’d adopt one who would become a regular presence.

Homer Wasn’t Always A Total Idiot

These days, it’s easy to forget that “Jerkass Homer” wasn’t always the default. Back in The Tracey Ullman Show days, Dan Castellaneta’s performance had more of a Walter Matthau influence. Homer came across as a wholesome father figure. He was dimwitted at times, but he could also serve as the voice of reason when in his element.

He wasn’t outright stupid. He was a lower-middle-class guy trying to do right by his family, but with clear blind spots. He didn’t know what he didn’t know. He wasn’t willfully ignorant, but he could be selfish in the way a lot of working-class dads are when they try to carve out a little peace for themselves in a chaotic household.

By Season 2, Homer was fatter, louder, and far less self-aware. The version of Homer we recognize today was starting to take shape, but he was still in an active stage of development as Castellaneta refined his vocal delivery, and the writers worked to shape him into a more complex character. Most of Homer’s early characterization came from The Tracey Ullman Show, which made sense in short bursts, but needed to be expanded once The Simpsons became a full sitcom.

What Could Have Been

If you own The Simpsons DVDs, you can find original footage from “Some Enchanted Evening,” and it’s clear that delaying its release was the right call. Roughly 70 percent of the episode was rewritten and reanimated, and if you look closely, you can still spot traces of the original version in what ultimately aired to over 14 million viewers. It’s a rough demo and a final master, all in one episode, and it’s jarring.

The finished episode plays like a confident introduction to the Simpson family. After heavy revisions, each character feels distinct enough to carry forward into future seasons. The strange reality, though, is that we only got that version because the original was bad enough to force a complete overhaul.

But show business is still a business. To keep the show alive, episodes had to air, intended order or not. Because of that, Season 1 doesn’t make much sense from a continuity, and sometimes, even a characterization standpoint. When you consider the alternative, it had to happen this way, or we probably wouldn’t still be talking about The Simpsons in 2026.

The Simpsons had a chaotic start, and Season 1 still holds up as a diamond in the rough. What’s more frustrating to think about is how many creators today will never get the same level of leeway. There are likely countless shows that never made it past a rough first pass because studios decided they weren’t worth the trouble.

There’s no denying that The Simpsons helped pave the way for shows like South Park and Family Guy to become household names, but it’s wild to think about how many missteps happened behind the scenes before the show truly hit its stride.

Like the rest of the world, Netflix has lately found an interest in the fascinating world of cults. However, its newest venture isn’t a true-crime documentary fans may be used to, but a six-part drama series starring Christopher Eccleston. Unlike the optimistic preacher he plays in HBO’s The Leftovers, Eccleston’s role as Mr. Phillips, the leader of a religious cult, is something quite different.

Unchosen follows a strict religious sect in the UK that has all the makings of a dangerous cult. At the center of it all is Rosie (Molly Windsor), a devout wife and mother, who starts to get disillusioned by the only world she has ever known. Though the cult swears off any contact with the outside world or modern technology, Rosie is relieved when her brother-in-law, Isaac (Aston McAuley), possesses a contraband phone, which allows them to call an ambulance when her daughter Grace almost drowns. This one event causes a chain reaction that makes Rosie start to question the world that she has always accepted.

Cults are often a source of fascination, but Unchosen doesn’t exploit the pain of others for entertainment value. The series is inspired by the real stories of cult survivors who were affected by religious indoctrination.

‘Unchosen’ Delves Into the Real World of Religious Cults

The opening text of Unchosen Episode 1 establishes that there are over 2,000 active religious cults spread across the United Kingdom. The Netflix series is completely fictionalized, but the realities of these communities inspired the show’s creatives. Series creator Julie Gearey reached out to many real-life former cult members, as she told Tudum.

“What we found was that quite a lot of them were traumatized. It was important to reassure them as much as we could that, firstly, nobody watching the show would ever recognize them and, secondly, that whatever they had to say about the emotional experience of being involved, we would try to respect and reflect as truthfully as possible within the show.”

The story at the center of Unchosen is more romantic than a show like this may typically have. The catalyst for Rosie’s separation from the cult is represented by the man who saved her daughter’s life. Played by Hawkeye’s Fra Fee, an escaped convict by the name of Sam dives into the pond where Rosie’s daughter starts to drown. He saves her, and immediately, Rosie is drawn to him. The titular “unchosen” man is outside the community and a direct contrast to Rosie’s fanatical and controlling husband, Adam (Asa Butterfield). A spark starts to kindle between Rosie and Sam, an obvious violation of the cult’s rules.

Sam notes that Rosie’s world has a lot of these rules, as she starts to buckle beneath the weight of it. This setup is an exciting way to attract viewers to the story, but the reality of these characters is close to these cults in real life. Like Rosie’s day-to-day, many of these cults are hierarchical, placing women beneath their husbands. They are not allowed to question the men or have minds of their own in many cases. Unchosen has invented many of the more narratively dramatic aspects, but the core emotional resonance is what is truthful.

Grearey’s series protects the identities of the real-life cult survivors by doing this, but is still able to communicate the dangers of these types of communities. The creator also doesn’t punch down on these stories and offers empathy for those inside these places.

“I think there’s a real comfort and support in these groups. You don’t have to worry about where you’re going to live, what you eat, or whether you’ve got any friends. It’s a very, very secure social structure … When it works, it really works, but if you start to question their methods … that’s where the problems start.”

With that in mind, there is no question as to why Unchosen is doing so well on Netflix. Other series, such as Ryan Murphy’s world of serial killers, seem to take all the wrong lessons from true crime. The fictional sect in Unchosen isn’t admired in any way, but it also doesn’t judge the characters who find refuge inside it. The truthful telling of these people’s experiences has resulted in a series unlike anything else on the platform.