Bitcoin miner TeraWulf posted a net loss of $427 million in the first quarter of 2026, up from the $61.4 million loss recorded in the same period a year earlier.

Total revenue for the quarter came in at $34 million, with high-performance computing (HPC) lease revenue accounting for $21 million, roughly 60% of the total and a 117% jump from the prior quarter, according to a Friday announcement. Bitcoin mining revenue fell 50% to around $13 million.

The HPC revenue was driven by 60 megawatts of operational critical IT capacity at Lake Mariner, one of North America’s largest HPC campuses, leased to Core42. TeraWulf is also coordinating infrastructure delivery with Fluidstack and Google, with additional capacity buildings on track for delivery in 2026.  The company ended the quarter with approximately $3.1 billion in cash.

“Our capital structure is designed to align long-term financing with contracted cash flows, supporting disciplined growth while maintaining financial flexibility,” chief financial officer Patrick Fleury said.

Related: CoreWeave shows how crypto-era infrastructure quietly became AI’s backbone

TeraWulf accelerates AI transition

In October last year, TeraWulf announced a 25-year lease deal with Fluidstack, backed by Google, worth around $9.5 billion in contracted revenues, an expansion of an earlier 10-year commitment. The miner is also building out a national pipeline of power-advantaged sites, including a newly acquired 480 MW site in Hawesville, Kentucky, a 300 MW project in Lansing, New York, and a 210 MW site in Morgantown, Maryland, with potential to scale to 1 gigawatt.

“We are building a power-advantaged platform that we believe is increasingly differentiated in a market constrained by access to power,” CEO Paul Prager said, noting that the company’s Abernathy joint venture, a 168 MW HPC project under a 25-year lease, remains on track for delivery in the fourth quarter of 2026.

Shares of WULF closed the day down 2.6%, though the stock has gained more than 105% since the start of the year and is up over 30% in the past month.

TeraWulf shares decline. Source: Yahoo! Finance

Related: Bitcoin Miner Bitdeer Liquidates Entire BTC Treasury, Holdings Fall to Zero

Riot’s data center business generates $33 million in revenue

As Cointelegraph reported, Riot Platforms posted $167.2 million in revenue for the first quarter of 2026, with its newly launched data center business contributing $33.2 million, helping offset a decline in Bitcoin mining revenue, which fell to $111.9 million from $142.9 million a year earlier.

Bitcoin miners are pivoting to AI infrastructure as shrinking margins push the industry toward more predictable revenue, with Core Scientific, MARA Holdings, Hive, Hut 8 and Iren converting mining facilities into data centers or acquiring AI compute assets.

Magazine: Bitcoin will not hit $1M by 2030, says veteran trader Peter Brandt

Emerging markets accounted for 77% of Binance users in 2026, up from 49% in 2020, as users in those countries increasingly used the exchange for savings, payments and investment access, the exchange said.

Binance Research’s latest report frames crypto adoption as a financial-access story rather than a trading story. Binance said 83% of users engaging with two or more products on the platform are based in emerging markets, while users in those markets show savings rates more than twice as high as users in developed markets.

About 36% of emerging-market Binance users with balances of at least $10 hold at least half of their portfolio in stablecoins, according to the report, which points to the pattern as “consistent with savings-oriented usage.” Globally, 28% of users meet that threshold, up from 4% in 2020.

The data points to growing use of crypto platforms as substitute financial infrastructure in markets where banking access remains limited.

The World Bank says 1.3 billion adults still lack access to financial services, while 900 million unbanked adults own a mobile phone and 530 million own a smartphone.

Binance said 4.7 billion adults lack access to credit or loans, 3.6 billion adults in low- and middle-income countries do not use digital payments or cards, and 1.4 billion savers in those countries earn no interest on deposits.

Stablecoins are central to the argument. Binance said transfers on high-performance networks can cost as little as $0.0001 and settle almost instantly, compared with a minimum of $20 for cross-border SWIFT transactions. The World Bank’s Remittance Prices Worldwide database puts the global average remittance cost above the UN target of less than 3%.

Stablecoins are, in fact, increasingly being used in emerging markets for remittances, savings and cross-border commerce, while also drawing warnings from Moody’s, the IMF and other institutions over monetary-sovereignty and financial-resilience risks.

Data from Brazil’s tax authority, for example, has shown stablecoins drive 90% of the country’s crypto volume.

The US banking lobby is mounting a last-minute push to stall the CLARITY Act just days before its scheduled Senate Banking Committee markup on May 14.

The American Bankers Association, the Bank Policy Institute, the Consumer Bankers Association, the Financial Services Forum, and the Independent Community Bankers of America issued a joint statement this week rejecting the compromise stablecoin yield language drafted by Senators Thom Tillis and Angela Alsobrooks. The coalition said the proposed language falls short of its policy goals and leaves dangerous loopholes that could trigger deposit flight from traditional banks.

The banking groups argue that Section 404 of the CLARITY Act still permits crypto platforms to offer rewards tied to account balances and how long users hold assets, which they say amounts to offering deposit interest under a different name. “Research demonstrates that yield-earning stablecoins could reduce all consumer, small-business, and farm loans by one-fifth or more,” the coalition said in its joint statement, adding that it is “imperative that Congress get this right.”

Lummis and Tillis push back

The response from the bill’s sponsors was immediate. Senator Cynthia Lummis, who chairs the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets, posted on X that the finalized bipartisan text “is the culmination of months of hard work to deliver a compromise on yield we can all live with.” Senator Tillis, who co-authored the deal, was sharper in his pushback, warning that certain factions within traditional finance may simply oppose any version of the CLARITY Act and are using the stablecoin yield debate as a mechanism to stall the legislation indefinitely.

Tillis’s closing line in his public defense left little room for ambiguity: “Some in the banking industry may not want either of these things to happen, and we respectfully agree to disagree.” The synchronized public defense from Lummis and Tillis signals the bipartisan coalition behind the compromise is holding firm as the markup window narrows.

The CLARITY Act cleared the House 294 to 134 in July 2025 and passed the Senate Agriculture Committee in January 2026, but has repeatedly stalled in the Senate Banking Committee over the stablecoin yield dispute. As crypto.news reported, senators including Cynthia Lummis and Bernie Moreno have said that failure before the May 21 Memorial Day recess could push the next viable window to 2030.

What comes next

Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott confirmed the markup hearing for May 14 at 10:30 am. The White House has set a July 4 target for passage, with crypto adviser Patrick Witt describing the stablecoin yield deal as closed. Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse said at Consensus Miami 2026 this week that the past week represented a “big positive shift” in Senate momentum.

Galaxy Digital head of research Alex Thorn has estimated the bill’s passage odds at roughly 50-50, while prediction markets currently put the figure above 60%. A HarrisX poll released this week found that 52% of registered US voters support the CLARITY Act, with 47% saying they would consider backing a candidate outside their preferred party if that candidate supported the legislation and theirs did not.

For the bill to reach the president’s desk, it must clear the Senate Banking Committee markup, survive a 60-vote floor threshold, be reconciled with the Senate Agriculture Committee version, and then reconciled with the House-passed text. Each of those steps carries its own risk of failure.

Key Highlights

• Shares of APH declined 6.29% as investors took profits after a robust earnings-driven rally
• First quarter 2026 earnings per share reached $1.06 versus analyst expectations of $0.95; sales totaled $7.62B against forecasts of $7.08B
• Analysts at Wall Street Zen and Zacks moved their ratings to “Hold” from “Buy”
• Chief Executive Richard Norwitt offloaded more than 515,000 shares during February for approximately $75.9M
• Average analyst price target stands at $176.53 supported by 13 Buy recommendations and 2 Hold ratings

Shares of Amphenol (APH) tumbled 6.29% on Friday, beginning the session at $127.72, as market participants retreated following a sustained period of appreciation.

Amphenol Corporation, APH

The decline seems driven by profit-taking dynamics rather than fundamental deterioration in the company’s operations. APH had experienced a significant run-up prior to its earnings announcement, prompting some investors to lock in gains.

The company’s first quarter 2026 performance exceeded expectations across key metrics. Earnings per share landed at $1.06, comfortably surpassing the Wall Street consensus of $0.95. Revenue figures impressed at $7.62 billion, substantially outpacing the anticipated $7.08 billion — representing a remarkable 58.4% year-over-year increase.

Looking ahead to Q2 2026, management provided earnings guidance between $1.14 and $1.16 per share. The Street’s current projection for full-year earnings stands at $4.76 per share.

Despite the impressive quarterly performance, market participants appear to be reassessing valuation levels. APH currently commands a price-to-earnings multiple of 36.70 alongside a PEG ratio of 1.20.

Analyst Rating Adjustments Create Headwinds

Wall Street Zen downgraded APH from “Buy” to “Hold” over the weekend. Zacks implemented an identical rating change in March, pointing to valuation considerations as the primary rationale.

However, the overall analyst community maintains a constructive outlook. Among the 15 firms covering the stock, 13 maintain Buy recommendations while only 2 assign Hold ratings. The consensus price objective rests at $176.53.

Evercore boosted its price target to $180 with an “Outperform” stance following the earnings release. Truist demonstrated even greater confidence, elevating its target to $200 while maintaining its “Buy” rating. Barclays similarly preserved its “Overweight” recommendation with a $180 price target.

Executive Share Sales Raise Questions

Chief Executive Officer Richard Adam Norwitt divested 515,281 shares throughout February at a mean price of $147.27, generating proceeds of approximately $75.9 million. This transaction reduced his direct stake by 21.09%.

Collectively, company insiders have disposed of 646,056 shares during the past 90 days — generating combined proceeds near $94.6 million.

While insider transactions don’t necessarily indicate problems ahead, the magnitude and timing of these sales have caught investors’ attention.

Institutional investors continue to maintain substantial holdings at 97.01% of outstanding shares. Multiple smaller investment firms established new positions during Q4 and Q1, though at relatively modest scale.

An additional consideration affecting investor sentiment involves a recent senior notes offering that elevated the debt-to-equity ratio to 1.18. While not particularly concerning, this development adds another variable for balance sheet-focused investors to monitor.

The stock’s 52-week trading range extends from $80.32 to $167.04. The 50-day moving average currently sits at $137.31, while the 200-day moving average registers at $139.35 — both positioned above the present trading price.

APH has generated a year-to-date return of 1.30%, and technical indicators continue to flash a Buy signal. The company maintains its regular quarterly dividend distribution.

To most people, trading in cryptocurrencies like bitcoin BTC$80,285.43, boils down to a simple question: Will prices go up or down?

But there’s another dimension to trading, which is volatility, a measure of how volatile prices could be regardless of direction. It’s already a hugely popular trade in stock markets, and now CME wants to bring it to bitcoin.

The world’s leading derivatives marketplace announced this week its plan to debut Bitcoin volatility futures on June 1, pending regulatory approval.

Unlike traditional bitcoin futures, the new contracts will not track the cryptocurrency’s price directly. Instead, they will refer to the CME CF Bitcoin Volatility Index (BVX), which represents the market’s expectations for bitcoin volatility over the next 4 weeks.

In simple terms, traders will be able to bet on whether bitcoin markets are about to become more chaotic or more stable, without necessarily taking a view on whether prices themselves are heading higher or lower.

“Crypto market participants are seeking regulated products that provide opportunities to gain digital assets exposure when markets move,” Giovanni Vicioso, global head of cryptocurrency products at CME Group, said in the press release. “With our new Bitcoin volatility futures, traders will be able to invest or hedge against the future volatility of bitcoin, allowing them to access a critical new layer of risk management.

Note that offshore exchanges such as Deribit offer futures tied to their own bitcoin volatility indices, but these volatility markets remain relatively small and outside the scope of participation for most U.S. institutions. Moreover, the onshore crypto market still lacks a mature, CME-style bitcoin volatility futures product, so volatility exposure and hedging is primarily achieved through options and other synthetic structures.

CME’s latest offering will expand the exchange’s existing product suite, which includes bitcoin futures and options. Futures went live in December 2017 and have since become the preferred instrument for institutions seeking directional exposure and arbitrage opportunities. They have generated billions in trading volume and open interest, even surpassing offshore giant Binance at one point last year.

This trend of the institutionalization of bitcoin accelerated with the debut of 11 spot-listed bitcoin ETFs in January 2024, and the subsequent debut and rapid rise in popularity of options tied to BlackRock’s IBIT.

So, CME’s volatility futures seem like the next logical step, helping institutions manage risk beyond price direction into volatility itself, according to Sam Gaer, chief investment officer of Monarq Asset Management’s Directional Fund.

“IBIT options open interest surpassing Deribit is a clear signal of institutional demand, and vol futures are the natural next step,” Gaer told CoinDesk in a Telegram message.

Gaer pointed to the way volatility trading evolved in traditional markets, noting that the CBOE Volatility Index, VIX, also known as the fear gauge, didn’t become a deeply liquid asset class on its own. Instead, liquidity accelerated only after exchange-traded funds and broader structured products built around VIX futures created a self-reinforcing ecosystem.

In other words, the growth in volatility trading was driven by derivatives linked to the spot VIX index. Once those products existed, volume attracted more volume, eventually turning volatility into a standalone market in its own right.

“VIX futures did not reach escape velocity until the ETF ecosystem developed around the futures (not the spot index, notably), and the same flywheel dynamic applies here. Volume begets volume. If CME’s product construction and composition are clearly defined and easily disseminated, this has the potential to be a watershed moment for Bitcoin volatility as an asset class,” Gaer said.

Key Highlights

• RKLB shares climbed to a fresh 52-week peak of $105.62 following TD Cowen’s price target increase from $90 to $120 with a Buy recommendation
• First quarter 2026 revenue hit an all-time high of $200.3 million, representing a ~63% increase from the prior year and surpassing analyst projections
• Second quarter revenue outlook upgraded to a range of $225–$240 million, suggesting roughly 16% quarter-over-quarter expansion
• Total order backlog surged 108% to an unprecedented $2.2 billion, with launch services accounting for 42% and space systems making up 58%
• Major wins include a $30 million hypersonic HASTE agreement with Anduril and the strategic purchase of space robotics company Motive Space Systems

Shares of Rocket Lab (RKLB) exploded higher by 34% during Friday’s trading session, finishing at $105.55 after touching a new 52-week high of $105.62 — a dramatic leap from the previous day’s close of $78.58. Trading volume surged to 76 million shares, approximately 247% higher than the three-month daily average.

Rocket Lab USA, Inc., RKLB

The dramatic rally followed an exceptional first quarter 2026 earnings release. The company reported record revenue of $200.3 million, representing a 63% year-over-year increase that exceeded Wall Street consensus estimates. The per-share loss narrowed to just $0.07, also outperforming analyst expectations.

TD Cowen wasted no time responding to the strong results. The investment firm boosted its RKLB price objective from $90 to $120 while reaffirming its Buy recommendation, providing additional momentum to an already explosive trading day.

The impressive performance extended beyond just top-line figures. Rocket Lab’s total backlog expanded by 108% to reach an all-time high of $2.2 billion. The composition shows increasing diversification, with 42% attributed to launch services and 58% coming from space systems operations.

Executives also elevated their second quarter revenue projection to a range of $225 million through $240 million. Such performance would represent another quarterly record and indicate approximately 16% growth from the first quarter.

Strategic Contracts and Defense Partnerships

Along with the quarterly performance, Rocket Lab unveiled multiple strategic agreements supporting its forward outlook.

The aerospace company secured what it described as its largest-ever launch agreement, encompassing numerous Neutron and Electron missions for a client that wasn’t publicly disclosed. This deal provides substantial revenue certainty to an already expanding backlog.

Rocket Lab also secured a $30 million HASTE hypersonic launch agreement with Anduril Industries. This collaboration brings together two prominent players in the defense technology sector.

Additionally, a Space Force demonstration project with Raytheon was revealed, further validating strong demand for Rocket Lab’s launch services within the defense industry.

During the quarter, Rocket Lab completed the acquisition of Motive Space Systems, a space robotics company, in a strategic move that could position the firm for expanded involvement in upcoming exploration initiatives.

Wall Street Perspectives

Analyst sentiment leans positive overall, though opinions vary across the Street. Roth MKm increased its price objective from $90 to $100 while maintaining a Buy recommendation prior to the earnings announcement. Cantor Fitzgerald maintained its Overweight stance with an $85 target back in March.

Conversely, Wells Fargo launched coverage in April with an Equal Weight rating and a $60 price target — significantly beneath current trading levels. KeyCorp moved RKLB to Sector Weight in January.

According to MarketBeat consensus data, the stock carries a “Moderate Buy” rating with a mean price target of $90. That average now trails the actual stock price considerably after Friday’s surge.

Recent insider transactions have leaned toward selling activity. Chief Financial Officer Adam Spice offloaded approximately 62,744 shares at $69.59 during March. Insider Frank Klein disposed of 36,768 shares at $71.95 around that same period. Total insider sales over the previous 90 days reached roughly 233,449 shares valued at approximately $16.5 million.

Institutional investors control 71.78% of outstanding shares. The stock’s 50-day moving average currently stands at $72.88, while the 200-day moving average rests at $68.50, both significantly trailing current price levels.

Following Friday’s rally, Rocket Lab’s market capitalization now stands at roughly $61 billion.

Name recognition in online gambling is built on specialisation. Stake.com built its name by specialising in the crypto gambling community — a platform that understood what crypto-native players valued, built its product around those values, and became the name most associated with crypto casino culture globally. Bet365 built its name by specialising in sportsbook comprehensiveness — a platform that understood what serious sports bettors needed, built an unmatched market coverage product, and became the name most associated with comprehensive sports betting internationally.

Both names reflect genuine specialisation and genuine achievement. Both continue to attract the players their specialisation was built for.

In 2026 a platform is emerging that does not specialise in the same narrow direction as either established name. ZunaBet launched this year with a product that takes what both names do best and builds a more complete offering around it — crypto-native infrastructure at the level of the best crypto casinos, a game library that exceeds what either established platform offers in depth and provider diversity, a sportsbook that covers traditional sports and esports comprehensively, and a loyalty program that delivers transparent direct returns to every player regardless of volume. This article examines all three and explains what comes after specialisation.

Stake.com: What the Crypto Casino Name Was Built On

Stake.com’s name in crypto gambling was built on a foundation of genuine community and genuine crypto credentials. The platform understood that the crypto gambling audience valued more than just accepting Bitcoin — they valued the transparency that crypto culture emphasises, the community that forms around shared platforms and content creators, and the in-house gaming experience that reflects the provably fair principles the space had developed.

The Stake Originals library is the product of that understanding — in-house games built with transparent mechanics, available exclusively on the platform, and carrying the distinctive identity of a product built from within crypto culture rather than adapted toward it. The community that formed around Stake.com through streamer partnerships and player engagement is genuine and it produced the brand recognition the platform carries.

The crypto payment credentials are real. Native cryptocurrency processing rather than third-party layers. Withdrawals at the speed the infrastructure allows. A payment experience that reflects genuine crypto infrastructure rather than fiat banking with cryptocurrency as an option.

The limitations surface when the product is examined beyond its specialisation. The third-party game library — outside Stake Originals — is narrower than the largest dedicated casino platforms. Players who want extensive coverage from the industry’s top third-party providers find the selection more limited than what platforms built specifically around provider diversity offer. The sportsbook covers major markets but is not the product’s primary focus and reflects that in its depth. The loyalty structure delivers clear value at high volumes but is less transparent and calculable for the regular player at moderate activity levels. Geographic restrictions apply in several significant markets.

Bet365: What the Sportsbook Name Was Built On

Bet365’s name in sports betting was built on 25 years of singular investment in one direction — the most comprehensive sportsbook coverage possible. The product that resulted is the industry reference point for market access. Major global sports at full depth, minor events that other platforms do not price, in-play coverage running on competitions that competitors close before they begin, live streaming of events embedded in the platform. The name reflects genuine product leadership in the category it specialised in.

The casino grew alongside the sportsbook. A large library from established providers, strong live dealer content, polished and consistent platform experience. The product is broad and reflects the investment of an operator with the time and resources to build at scale.

The limitations are the limitations of a traditional platform built for a traditional player. Geographic restrictions eliminate the platform for the US market and several others. The loyalty program is structured around invite-only VIP tiers — the general player base operates without meaningful loyalty visibility or a clear pathway toward the levels where rewards matter. Crypto support is minimal. Fiat banking timelines apply throughout.

For the crypto-native player Bet365’s limitations are not incidental — they are structural. The platform was built for a different payment infrastructure, a different loyalty expectation, and a different player profile than the one arriving in growing numbers in 2026.

ZunaBet: Building What Comes After Both

ZunaBet launched in 2026 under Strathvale Group Ltd, operating under an Anjouan gaming license and registered in Belize. The team carries over 20 years of combined industry experience. It is not Stake.com’s community-first crypto brand and it is not Bet365’s 25-year sportsbook institution. It is a crypto-first, internationally accessible platform built to take what both names do well and construct a more complete product around those strengths while addressing what both leave open.

The game library builds what comes after both platforms’ casino offerings. ZunaBet carries 11,294 titles from 63 providers. Stake.com’s strength is Originals — a distinctive in-house product — but its third-party coverage is narrower. Bet365’s casino is substantial but not at the provider diversity level that ZunaBet reaches. Evolution for the full live dealer catalogue. Pragmatic Play across multiple product categories. Hacksaw Gaming for the high-volatility mechanics that experienced players seek. Yggdrasil for its distinctive design philosophy. BGaming for the crypto-native aesthetic. Sixty-three different creative approaches producing content with different mechanics, different volatility profiles, and different visual identities. The library sustains long-term engagement through genuine variety rather than the distinctive identity of Originals or the adequate breadth of an established casino product.

The sportsbook builds what comes after both platforms’ sports coverage for the modern player. Football, basketball, tennis, NHL, and other major global sports alongside CS2, Dota 2, League of Legends, and Valorant as genuine primary markets. Virtual sports and combat sports complete a sportsbook built around the full range of what the 2026 player bets on. The esports coverage in particular goes beyond what either established name prioritises seriously.

The payment infrastructure builds what comes after both platforms’ payment approaches. More than 20 cryptocurrencies supported natively — BTC, ETH, USDT across multiple chains, SOL, DOGE, ADA, XRP, and others. No platform processing fees. Withdrawals settling in minutes. Apps across iOS, Android, Windows, and MacOS with 24-hour live chat support. The crypto credentials are genuine and the breadth of coin support exceeds what either established platform offers.

Payments: What Each Name Built and What Comes After

The payment comparison traces three different positions on the crypto-traditional spectrum.

Stake.com built native crypto payments for the crypto-native player. The infrastructure is genuine and the withdrawal experience reflects it. The specialisation is real.

Bet365 built fiat banking payments for the traditional sports bettor. The infrastructure reflects 25 years of fiat-era operation. Bank transfer, card payment, e-wallet — each with associated timelines. The specialisation is equally real and equally limiting for the player outside its profile.

ZunaBet builds what comes after both — native crypto infrastructure at the level of the best crypto casinos but with a coin breadth that exceeds the typical crypto casino offering. Twenty-plus coins supported natively. Withdrawals in minutes. No fees beyond network costs. The payment position takes Stake.com’s crypto authenticity and extends it across a wider range of currencies and a more complete platform.

For the player who valued Stake.com’s crypto payments but wanted more — ZunaBet’s payment infrastructure is what more looks like.

Loyalty: What Each Name Built and What Comes After

The loyalty comparison reveals three different approaches to rewarding regular players.

Stake.com built a loyalty structure around rakeback and bonuses that delivers clear value at the upper end of the volume curve. The community-driven rewards ecosystem is genuine. For the regular player at moderate volume the structure is less transparent and the effective return less clearly calculable in advance.

Bet365 built a loyalty structure around invite-only VIP tiers. The rewards at those tiers are genuine. For the general player base the structure offers minimal visibility and no accessible pathway toward the levels that matter.

ZunaBet builds what comes after both through the dragon evolution loyalty system. Six tiers — Squire, Warden, Champion, Divine, Knight, and Ultimate — with a gamified mascot called Zuno and direct rakeback rates of 1%, 2%, 4%, 5%, 10%, and 20%. All tiers open to all players. All rates applying to all activity — casino and sportsbook alike. No conversion. No invitation. The transparency that Stake.com’s culture values is built into the structure explicitly and the accessibility that Bet365’s VIP system lacks is available from tier one.

Twenty percent at the Ultimate tier. Calculable before joining. Consistent throughout membership. Additional tier benefits — up to 1,000 free spins, VIP club access, double wheel spins — extend the structure beyond the core rakeback.

The Welcome Bonus

ZunaBet new players receive a bonus across three deposits totalling up to $5,000 plus 75 free spins. First deposit matched 100% up to $2,000 with 25 free spins. Second deposit matched 50% up to $1,500 with 25 spins. Third deposit matched 100% up to $1,500 with 25 spins.

Stake.com and Bet365 offer their own promotional structures for new and existing players. Current terms vary and should be confirmed directly on each platform.

The Player That Comes After Both Names

The player ZunaBet was built for is the player that comes after both established names’ primary audiences. Not the Stake.com community member whose primary relationship with the platform is through streamers and Originals. Not the Bet365 sports bettor whose primary criterion is traditional market coverage. The player who wants crypto-native infrastructure across twenty-plus coins, a game library from sixty-three providers, serious esports coverage, and a loyalty program that states its return clearly before they commit to earning it.

ZunaBet launched in 2026 and is still establishing the track record that both established names built over years of consistent operation. That gap is real and players should weigh it honestly.

But what comes after both names — the platform that takes crypto authenticity, game library depth, sportsbook breadth, and loyalty transparency and combines them in a single product — launched in 2026. That platform is ZunaBet and the player it was built for is finding it.

Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

Payward, the parent company of cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, has filed an application with the U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) for a national trust company charter. If approved, the plan would establish Payward National Trust Company to provide fiduciary custody and related services primarily for digital assets, signaling a step toward deeper integration with traditional banking infrastructure for crypto firms.

In a Friday notice, Payward said the OCC charter, if granted, would build on its current Special Purpose Depository Institution (SPDI) status established in Wyoming through Kraken Financial, and on its Federal Reserve master account, which gives it access to the U.S. payment system. The move aligns with a regulatory trend that has already seen the OCC grant similar charters to other digital-asset firms and marks a potential shift in how crypto firms access insured custody and standard banking rails.

A national trust company provides the certainty institutions require and establishes the infrastructure to build the next generation of custody,” Kraken co-CEO Arjun Sethi said. “This is not about being first; it is about getting the framework right so markets can scale with clarity, interoperability, and long-term vision for what clients will demand as these systems mature.”

The OCC’s actions to date have drawn scrutiny as it weighs applications from a mix of crypto incumbents. Earlier, the agency approved national trust charters for Ripple Labs, BitGo, Circle, Fidelity Digital Assets and Paxos in December, part of a broader push to formalize the custody and banking infrastructure underpinning digital assets. The agency’s leadership, including Jonathan Gould, Trump-era nominee who heads the OCC, has attracted attention for deploying charters in this sector while considering other high-profile filings, such as World Liberty Financial’s crypto-related bid.

Payward notes that the OCC application would extend the capabilities of Kraken Financial, the Wyoming-SPDI subsidiary, and would complement its existing Federal Reserve master account access. The charter would, in effect, aim to bridge the gap between digital-asset custody and the traditional financial system, providing a regulated framework that institutions often require for scale and interoperability.

Kraken’s broader growth ambitions and regulatory context

While the OCC process unfolds, Kraken’s parent company has been actively pursuing growth through other avenues, hinting at a broader strategy that goes beyond custody. In May, Kraken’s leadership indicated the firm could pursue a U.S. initial public offering (IPO) in the coming years—an aspiration the executives described as being “about 80% ready” to realize by 2027, contingent on market conditions and regulatory clarity. That timeline aligns with the company’s recent activity in expanding its service footprint, including partnerships and acquisitions intended to broaden its product suite beyond spot trading and into custody, derivatives and cross-border settlement.

The same period saw Kraken exiting an array of strategic deals. Payward announced the BitNominal acquisition to expand its derivatives capabilities in the U.S., and it has also disclosed a separate agreement related to Reap, a move that underscores the exchange’s push into crypto-asset offerings that require more sophisticated market infrastructure and risk management. These developments sit alongside Kraken’s broader plan to participate in the evolving ecosystem where custody, settlement, and compliance form the backbone of institutional-grade crypto services.

Kraken’s strategy also interacts with a regulatory backdrop that has become increasingly influential for crypto firms seeking to scale in the United States. The OCC’s willingness to extend charters to a growing set of digital-asset firms signals a potential path to a more formalized banking relationship for crypto companies. Still, the approvals have coincided with ongoing scrutiny over the pace and nature of such charters, particularly as the regulator weighs applications from a spectrum of players with varying business models and risk profiles. Observers will be watching how these titling decisions affect custody standards, customer protection, and the reliability of settlement rails as crypto markets mature.

What to watch next for custody, banking rails, and the crypto market

As Payward’s OCC filing proceeds, investors and users should monitor several lanes of development. First, the fate of the national trust charter itself will shape how other crypto firms structure custody and fiduciary services—potentially lowering conversion frictions for institutions seeking insured, regulated custody arrangements. Second, regulators’ evolving stance on crypto banking infrastructure—especially the interplay between SPDI-like structures and Fed settlement accounts—could influence the cost and timeliness of on- and off-ramps for institutional participants. Third, Kraken’s broader growth plan, including any public listing timeline and the success of its acquisitions and partnerships, will affect the company’s ability to finance its expansion and compete for custody, derivatives, and cross-border services in a crowded market.

Market participants should also note the tension between rapid innovation and regulatory oversight. While the OCC’s track record in approving trust charters for some major players signals a pathway for legitimate crypto custody services, policymakers continue to weigh consumer protection, anti-money-laundering controls, and systemic risk considerations. The coming months should reveal how these factors shape the trajectory of Kraken and similar firms as they seek greater alignment with traditional financial rails while preserving the benefits of decentralized finance and digital-asset innovation.

As this regulatory journey unfolds, observers should keep an eye on any updates around the OCC’s assessments, the timeline for Payward’s charter decision, and the implications for custody standards across digital assets. The outcome could influence a broader shift in how crypto firms access banking services and custody infrastructure, potentially altering the competitive landscape for U.S.-based exchanges and the institutions that serve them.