Bitcoin has entered a highly sensitive phase after an aggressive downside continuation. The recent sell-off has pushed it into a historically reactive demand region of $60K, while broader risk sentiment remains fragile. The market is approaching a juncture where technical structure, higher-timeframe demand, and on-chain liquidity dynamics converge, making the coming sessions critical for short- to mid-term direction.

Bitcoin Price Analysis: The Daily Chart

On the daily timeframe, Bitcoin has decisively broken below its recent structure and continued to respect the descending channel, while the rejection from the middle boundary of $75K confirms that sellers remain firmly in control. The most important development is the impulsive breakdown toward the lower boundary of the channel, where the asset is now testing a major demand zone at the $60K price region that previously acted as a strong buyers’ base earlier in the cycle.

This demand area, located at the $60K region, is structurally significant as it represents the last major consolidation before the previous impulsive expansion. While prior price action on the chart confirms this zone’s historical relevance, the current interaction is far more aggressive, suggesting that any bullish reaction from this region would likely begin as a corrective bounce rather than an immediate trend reversal.

As long as Bitcoin remains below the descending channel resistance and the 100- and 200-day moving averages, the daily structure remains decisively bearish, with downside continuation still a valid risk if demand fails to absorb selling pressure.

BTC/USDT 4-Hour Chart

Zooming into the 4-hour timeframe, the bearish structure becomes even clearer. The most recent move shows a sharp sell-side expansion into the current demand zone at $60K psychological support, followed by a minor reactive bounce, which so far lacks strong follow-through.

From a short-term perspective, the key level to monitor is the nearest supply zone overhead at the $75K, formed after the last impulsive breakdown. Any corrective rebound is likely to face selling pressure as the price approaches this area, especially if volume and momentum remain weak.

As long as Bitcoin fails to reclaim and hold above this supply region, rebounds should be treated as pullbacks within a broader bearish trend rather than confirmation of a trend shift. A failure to hold the current demand zone would expose the price to a deeper downside extension toward the channel’s lower boundary of $55K.

Sentiment Analysis

The liquidation heatmap provides valuable context for the recent price behavior. The one-year BTC/USDT liquidation heatmap shows a dense liquidity pocket concentrated around and slightly below the $60K–$65K region, which aligns closely with the current price area. This clustering of liquidity suggests that this zone has been a magnet for price, driven by forced liquidations of over-leveraged long positions during the recent sell-off.

Notably, as price approaches this region, liquidation intensity declines relative to current levels, indicating that a substantial portion of downside leverage has already been unwound. This dynamic increases the probability of short-term stabilization or a reactive bounce, particularly if aggressive sellers begin to lose momentum.

However, the absence of significant liquidation clusters above current price levels implies that upside liquidity is limited in the short term, reinforcing the idea that any rebound is more likely to be corrective rather than trend-changing.

Overall, while the broader structure remains bearish, the convergence of strong historical demand and reduced downside liquidation pressure suggests that Bitcoin may attempt a relief move or consolidation phase from this zone.

TLDR:

• Dealer hedging from BlackRock IBIT structured notes amplified Bitcoin price swings at key triggers. 
• Structured products with knock-ins, auto-callables, and buffers force automatic BTC market flows. 
• Mapping issuance and barrier levels helps traders anticipate short-term Bitcoin price movements. 
• Bitcoin volatility driven by flows often occurs independently of broader market sentiment shifts.

BlackRock IBIT Bitcoin crash is drawing attention as Arthur Hayes connects dealer hedging and structured notes to BTC volatility. Traders face flows driven by automated mechanisms, not sentiment.

Bitcoin is trading at $69,324.50, up 0.86% over the past 24 hours, supported by strong trading volume of $94.1 billion. Despite the short-term rebound, BTC remains down 16.56% over the past seven days, reflecting elevated volatility. 

Recent price action shows how short-term gains can occur even as broader pressure persists, with market flows and positioning continuing to influence Bitcoin’s near-term direction.

Dealer Hedging Drives Bitcoin Volatility

Structured products tied to BlackRock’s IBIT create complex hedging dynamics. Dealers sell these notes to clients and hedge the embedded options using BTC spot or futures. 

As positions grow, their rebalancing can directly influence prices. These notes often include auto-callables, knock-ins, and downside buffers. 

As BTC approaches key barriers, dealers must act. They buy when prices rise and sell when prices fall. This creates mechanical pressure that can resemble sudden market moves.

Arthur Hayes explained that these flows are not directional bets. Instead, they are systematic hedging responses. 

For example, when a Morgan Stanley note struck near $105,000, its 75% knock-in at $78,700 forced the dealer to sell once BTC fell below that level.

In quiet markets, these actions are subtle. However, when positions are crowded, they can dominate price movements. 

As BTC crosses trigger points, flows accelerate automatically, affecting volatility clusters and market perception.

Such mechanisms also extend to correlated assets. Precious metals like silver and gold experienced heightened volatility during the Bitcoin sell-off. 

Silver fell more than 18%, and MSTR stock declined as bearish sentiment spread. Transitioning from calm to stressed conditions amplifies these effects further.

Mapping Trigger Points and Market Flows

Hayes is mapping bank-issued notes to identify key trigger zones. Each note contains invisible barriers that influence dealer hedges. 

Understanding these levels is now essential for traders seeking to anticipate flow-driven price swings.

CryptoQuant analysts confirmed that ETFs, including BlackRock IBIT, have reduced positions accumulated last year. 

This steady selling creates pressure independent of market sentiment. Therefore, price moves may reflect hedging mechanics rather than investor pessimism.

Community discussions on X support Hayes’ observations. Traders note that auto-call and knock-in levels create predictable flow points. 

These mechanical triggers can lead to accelerated selling or buying, often before public narratives emerge.

Moreover, the recent BTC rebound to $70,000 highlights how flows can reverse. Dealers adjust as triggers reset, showing how structured product mechanics shape short-term volatility. 

Hayes emphasizes that traders must adapt strategies according to issuance, positioning, and barrier geometry.

Overall, the BlackRock IBIT Bitcoin crash illustrates a shift. BTC is no longer influenced solely by macro trends or sentiment. Instead, structured product flows and hedging dynamics now play a critical role in price movements.

Tether, the issuer of the world’s most widely traded stablecoin, has frozen more than $500 million in digital assets.

The funds are linked to a massive illegal gambling and money-laundering syndicate in Turkey.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Tether Marks One of Crypto’s Largest Crackdowns

The freeze targets assets reportedly owned by Veysel Sahin, an individual Turkish prosecutors accuse of orchestrating a sprawling illegal betting network.

Notably, this move marks one of the largest single-asset seizures in the cryptocurrency sector to date.

Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino confirmed the company’s role in the crackdown, emphasizing the firm’s increasing cooperation with international law enforcement.

“Law enforcement came to us, they provided some information, we looked at the information and we acted in respect of the laws of the country. And that’s what we do when we work with the DOJ, when we work with the FBI, you name it,” he reportedly said.

Meanwhile, the enforcement action highlights a significant pivot for the British Virgin Islands-incorporated firm. Once criticized by regulators for a perceived lack of transparency, Tether has repositioned itself as a proactive partner to global police agencies.

Sponsored

Sponsored

Earlier this year, the company froze more than $180 million worth of its USDT token. In total, Tether has now frozen more than $3 billion in assets since its inception.

With a circulating supply exceeding $187 billion, Tether’s USDT token serves as the primary source of liquidity for the global cryptocurrency market. BeInCrypto previously reported that this asset serves more than 534 million users globally.

Its widespread use allows traders to move funds quickly between exchanges without relying on traditional banking rails.

However, the speed and scale of recent interventions have dismantled the “censorship-resistant” reputation that once defined the digital asset sector.

Beyond enforcement, Tether has been aggressively diversifying its USDT reserves over the past year.

The company recently announced a $150 million investment in Gold.com, and a $100 million strategic investment in Anchorage Digital, America’s first federally regulated digital asset bank.

Meanwhile, these investment follows a record-breaking financial year for the stablecoin giant.

Buoyed by $10 billion in 2025 profits, Tether has expanded its reach beyond stablecoins. The firm is now deploying capital across a diverse portfolio of internal initiatives, ranging from sports to Bitcoin mining, decentralized communications, and artificial intelligence.

Crypto markets continue to shift as investors balance caution with the search for fresh opportunities. Established meme coins are offering mixed signals, with Dogecoin price today hovering near key levels after light gains, while volume remains soft. At the same time, the shiba inu price is moving sideways following recent volatility, keeping traders focused on whether consolidation will turn into a breakout or further decline.

Against this backdrop, BlockDAG is drawing stronger attention by offering access before public trading begins. Its final private round is live at a fixed price of $0.00025, with no vesting and full token delivery at launch. Early buyers also receive limited early trading access, a structure rarely available to retail participants. For investors tracking potential top crypto gainers, BlockDAG (BDAG) presents a clearer, earlier entry point than most market options today.

Dogecoin Price Today Shows Mixed Signals Near $0.11 Level

Dogecoin is showing mixed signals as the crypto market remains uncertain. Fear is still present, but selling pressure has slowed for now. The meme coin sector rose 3% in the last day, reaching a market value of $38.10 billion. Dogecoin gained about 2%, trading between $0.1058 and $0.11. Dogecoin price today sits near $0.1079, while daily trading volume fell sharply by over 43% to $1.26 billion. Recent data also shows $2.40 million in liquidations.

If weakness continues, Dogecoin price today could slip toward the $0.1068 support level, and deeper losses may push it below $0.1057. On the upside, a recovery could lift Dogecoin price today toward $0.1090 and possibly above $0.1102 if buying strength improves.

Shiba Inu Price Trades Sideways Amid Market Uncertainty

Shiba Inu starts February 2026 in a consolidation phase as traders closely watch price trends, on-chain data, and overall market sentiment. After strong volatility in recent months, price action has slowed, raising questions about whether a breakout or sideways movement will follow. Shiba Inu price is currently trading near $0.000006521, reflecting a 5.91% daily decline. The token holds a market cap of about $3.85 billion, while trading volume stands near $144.75 million.

Technical charts show downward pressure, with resistance around $0.00000702. Strong buying could push prices toward this level. However, if selling increases, support lies near $0.00000661, with further downside toward $0.00000600. Indicators show mixed signals, keeping the Shiba Inu price in focus for the coming weeks.

BlockDAG Final Private Round Goes Live at $0.00025

Most traders chase top crypto gainers after the move has already happened. The BlockDAG private sale flips that script by letting participants step in before price discovery even begins.

This final private round is live at $0.00025, locking in a launch valuation that public buyers won’t see again. With a projected launch price of $0.05, BDAG is positioned for a 200× upside, but only for those who secure allocation now. Once this round closes, the opportunity window shuts with it.

What makes this setup different is execution. There’s no vesting, no delayed claims, and no waiting periods. On launch day, your full allocation is delivered straight to your wallet. Clean. Simple. Immediate.

Then comes the edge most people never get: nine hours of early trading access before public markets open. That window exists for one reason: to let private sale participants position ahead of the initial volatility wave. While others rush in blind, you’re already active.

This isn’t a rolling sale or an evergreen offer. The final allocation is finite. When it fills, BDAG becomes fully distributed, forever. From that point on, exposure is limited to open-market buys at whatever price demand sets.

For anyone scanning the market for the top crypto gainers of the next cycle, this private sale isn’t about hype. It’s about timing, structure, and access, three things public markets never offer equally. The dashboard is open. Supply is moving. The clock isn’t slowing down.

BlockDAG Makes Its Case as a Future Top Crypto Gainer

As markets pause, the contrast between hesitation and opportunity is becoming clearer. Dogecoin price today and Shiba Inu price continue to reflect uncertainty, with both assets locked in tight ranges and waiting on a broader market push. For investors chasing momentum, patience is being tested.

BlockDAG, however, is operating on a different timeline. Its final private round at $0.00025 offers fixed pricing, instant ownership, and early trading access before the public rush begins. Once this window closes, entry shifts to open markets at unknown prices. For those scanning the horizon for the next wave of top crypto gainers, the choice is simple. Act early, or watch from the sidelines as demand takes over.

Private Sale: https://purchase.blockdag.network

Website: https://blockdag.network

Telegram: https://t.me/blockDAGnetworkOfficial

Discord: https://discord.gg/Q7BxghMVyu

Disclaimer: This is a Press Release provided by a third party who is responsible for the content. Please conduct your own research before taking any action based on the content.

The community was quick to pick up the inconsistency in his words, especially when it came down to BTC.

The author of the Rich Dad Poor Dad best-seller came under fire recently after making some interesting yet highly controversial comments about when he allegedly stopped buying certain assets, including BTC.

The question many community members asked was – Is he lying now, or has he been deceitful for a long time?

(When) Did Kiyosaki Lie?

The popular author and investment guru became a prominent BTC bull during the COVID crash and has frequently praised the asset. Moreover, he has been advising people to buy more BTC, as well as gold, silver, and he recently added ETH to his narrative.

What’s even more interesting is that he has made multiple posts on X indicating that he has bought more. Just a few examples include on July 1, 2025, when he literally said on X that he had “bought another bitcoin today.” At the time, the cryptocurrency traded between $105,000 and $110,000 – this is important for the story in this article.

Then, just a few weeks later, when BTC exploded above $117,000, he noted that he was “going to buy one more bitcoin asap.” Kiyosaki also explained in early 2026 that he ignores the prices of BTC and ETH and just keeps buying more.

Yet, in his most recent post on the matter, which caused significant backlash, he claimed that he stopped buying bitcoin at $6,000. Just for reference, the cryptocurrency hasn’t traded at such low levels since right after the COVID-19 crash in mid-2020. In fact, even with its recent crash to $60,000, that’s still 10x from the price he claimed.

Naturally, the ever-vigilant crypto community quickly picked up the inconsistency in his posts on X, and lashed out about being a liar – either now, or he has been lying for years.

You may also like:

More Lies?

Others went after different claims he has made throughout the years, mostly for major crashes and different investment advice he had given, many of which never materialized. Mark McGrath, for instance, brought up a chart with many of his comments and shot straight at Kiyosaki, claiming that he is “such a lying grifter.”

You’re such a lying grifter holy cow.

You’ve been pumping all 3 of these non stop daily for years and now you claim you were never buying?

How you didn’t win the financial charlatan of the year award, I’ll never understand pic.twitter.com/gv6D9mNLM4

Advertisement

— Mark McGrath (@MarkMcGrathCFP) February 6, 2026

Has the POTUS finally begun filling up the promised Bitcoin reserve? Jim Cramer claims so.

During the 2024 presidential election campaign, Donald Trump turned the tide for the cryptocurrency industry and became a vocal supporter, a significant shift from his previous stance.

He made multiple promises that the United States would become the crypto capital of the world and that his administration would do great things for Bitcoin and other assets. One of those promises got the community really excited as he said he wanted all remaining BTC to be mined in the US and claimed the country would establish a designated Bitcoin reserve.

The expectations were extremely high, which was among the reasons why BTC skyrocketed after he won the elections, and surged to consecutive all-time highs in 2025. However, a quick reality check a year after his inauguration shows there’s no such reserve, despite rumors that it would be a crypto stockpile including popular alts.

After a prolonged silent period with little to no movement on the matter, Jim Cramer just brought it up and made some serious claims.

In a recent CNBC appearance, he said he had “heard” that the president was going to fill up the Bitcoin reserve at $60,000. This became possible on Friday when the asset indeed plummeted to that level for the first time since before the presidential elections in late 2024.

There’s no proof for these claims at the time of this post. The only fund that is being filled with BTC is Binance’s SAFU initiative. The exchange has made a few consecutive BTC purchases, converting its SAFU fund from stablecoins to a Bitcoin-dominated fund.

Perfecting timing too. https://t.co/6vytzn5XGr

— CZ 🔶 BNB (@cz_binance) February 7, 2026

You may also like:

Bitcoin failed to sustain a move above $69,000 as markets opened the weekend with caution, mirroring a broader hesitancy among traders about chasing new highs amid an uncertain macro backdrop. Fresh downside risk was baked into price action as BTC slipped more than $4,000 from the daily open, signaling that the rebound into the weekend may have been a relief rally rather than a durable trend reversal. Analysts point to resistance just below or at the old 2021 all-time high, around $69,000, which is seen as a formidable barrier. Meanwhile, two CME futures gaps loom on the horizon, offering potential magnets for price if demand accelerates again.

Key points:

• Bitcoin faces a lack of acceptance above $69,000, while traders see new lows to come.

• Analysis says that the rebound into the weekend was nothing more than a “relief rally.”

• Two CME futures gaps provide potential targets for BTC price upside.

BTC price bottom “not in,” analysis warns

Data from TradingView showed BTC price action dropping more than $4,000 versus the daily open. With the old 2021 all-time high increasingly turning to resistance, cautious traders rejected the notion of a quick revival. The immediate takeaway among several market observers was that the weekend rally looked more like a relief bounce than a sustainable bottom formation.

“TLDR: The bottom for BTC is not in. My priority right now is capital preservation,” said Keith Alan, cofounder of trading resource Material Indicators, in a post on X the day before the latest price action. His warning captured a broader mood among traders who view the market as exposed to further downside risk before any durable upward momentum could reassert itself. A separate blockquote captured his sentiment: “If you’re thinking, ‘We’re so back,’ we’re not. There is literally no evidence of that yet.”

Advertisement

Alan also highlighted the significance of the 2021 peak around $69,000, describing it as an “important” level within what he characterized as an ongoing relief rally. He added that the recent move was “a gift yesterday,” but warned that lower prices may come before a renewed bull-market cycle could take hold.

Zooming out, market analyst Rekt Capital also argued that the most pronounced downside pressure may still be ahead. In a post on X, he likened BTC/USD’s behavior to the late-2022 bear market, suggesting that a recurring historical pattern—where a fourth consecutive cycle echoes a familiar base formation—points to further weakness before a potential bottom is established. “This is the 4th consecutive cycle that this historical tendency has continued. And history suggests there’s more downside to come,” he wrote, underscoring the stubborn risk that BTC could test lower support before a broader recovery materializes.

Bitcoin bulls bet on CME gap fills

Saturday’s retracement, meanwhile, left a new potential “gap” in CME Group’s Bitcoin futures market. This development has kept a subset of traders focused on classic short-term price magnets, with the market watching two CME gaps that could act as catalysts if prices rally in the near term.

Related: Bitcoin beats FTX, COVID-19 crash with record dive below 200-day trend line

A short-term magnet narrative has re-emerged, centered on a gap near $84,000 and a separate level that could pull prices higher if demand re-emerges. Traders argued that such gaps often attract price action as liquidity cycles through the market, even if the longer-term trend remains uncertain. The chatter around CME gaps aligns with a broader view that a relief rally could redraw price trajectories in the near term, though it is not a guarantee of a lasting bounce.

Advertisement

Will we see this #Bitcoin CME Gap filled next week?

$84,215 🎯 pic.twitter.com/ZHaKynuR3F

— Elja (@Eljaboom) February 7, 2026

In parallel, traders like Michaël van de Poppe, a veteran analyst and founder of various crypto ventures, voiced a more constructive near-term view. He forecast a continuation pattern where a correction gives way to a move toward the CME gap and beyond, suggesting that the next week could carry BTC toward the $75,000-and-higher zone if momentum reasserts. “Today: correction day. Tomorrow: back up again towards the CME gap. Next week: continuation to $75k+,” he wrote in a post on X, signaling that the possibility of a rebound is not dismissed by some observers.

Notably, Samson Mow, CEO of Bitcoin-adoption firm JAN3, framed the event as a test of whether large-scale corporate buyers will step in to buy BTC at the new price levels. He described the higher CME gap as one of two questions every financial analyst should be asking: whether institutional demand can absorb the selling pressure given the 15-month low in BTC prices, and whether corporate treasury activity will pick up as prices drift lower. “I believe the answers are not for long and very soon,” he concluded in a post on X, signaling that the near term could reveal significant shifts in demand just as price action wobbles around key levels.

//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Why it matters

The present price action matters because it tests the resilience of BTC’s uptrend hypothesis at a time when macro uncertainties linger. A failure to sustain moves beyond critical resistance around $69,000 reinforces the notion that the market is wrestling with a structural pivot rather than a short-lived surge. The CME gaps add a practical, price-target dimension to the debate: if price finds buyers near those gaps, it could spur a corrective rally that lasts into the following week; if not, the risk-off mood may extend and push BTC toward the lower end of recent ranges.

Moreover, the discourse around corporate treasury demand—an ongoing theme in crypto markets—could shape the supply/demand balance in the months ahead. If large buyers re-enter at these levels, they could provide a floor that mitigates downside risk and sets the stage for a broader recovery. Conversely, persistent macro weak spots or a fresh risk-off impulse could keep BTC mired in a corrective phase, testing support levels that traders have watched since late 2025.

Taken together, the footage from trading desks shows a market that remains finely poised between a cautious, risk-averse stance and a renewed appetite for risk-taking when specific technical benchmarks align with liquidity drivers. The result is a price story that is less about a single breakout and more about the tug of war between macro-impacted liquidity and market structure signals like CME gaps and key resistance levels.

What to watch next

• Watch how BTC trades around the CME gap near $84,000 in the coming days and whether price action tests that area again.
• Monitor whether buyers reappear near the mid-to-upper $70k region, potentially signaling a shift in the short-term trend.
• Look for any signs of renewed institutional or corporate BTC treasury activity as prices approach critical levels.
• Assess macro cues and liquidity conditions, since they likely will continue shaping volatility and the pace of any potential relief rallies.

Sources & verification

• TradingView BTCUSD price data referenced in the price action discussion.
• Comments from Keith Alan (Material Indicators) on BTC’s bottom and capital preservation, shared on X.
• Analysis from Rekt Capital regarding cycle patterns and potential downside in BTC/USD.
• Forecasts from Michaël van de Poppe on CME gaps and near-term targets.
• Remarks from Samson Mow on corporate BTC treasury activity and near-term demand dynamics.

What the market is watching next

The coming days will be telling for BTC’s near-term orientation. If the price can reclaim and sustain a move above the $75,000–$80,000 range and, more broadly, approach the CME gap around $84,000, bulls may gain a foothold that could catalyze a more substantive rebound. Conversely, if selling pressure intensifies and price breaks back toward the mid-$60,000s, the market could extend the current corrective phase while traders reassess whether a longer bear-market cycle has run its course. As always, liquidity, macro risk sentiment, and institutional participation will remain the key variables shaping outcomes in the weeks ahead.

Bitcoin ETFs recorded $330.67 million in net inflows on February 6, ending a three-day outflow streak that drained $1.25 billion from products.

BlackRock’s IBIT led with $231.62 million in inflows. At the same time, Ark & 21Shares’ ARKB has brought in $43.25 million and Bitwise’s BITB posted $28.70 million in inflows.

The reversal came as Bitcoin (BTC) price climbed 6.6% over 24 hours and quickly fell to the $67,000 level.

Total net assets under management rose to approximately $105 billion from $80.76 billion on February 5, while cumulative total net inflow reached $54.65 billion. VanEck’s HODL and Fidelity’s FBTC showed no updated data for the trading session.

February 2-5 posted $1.25B in Bitcoin ETFs redemption

The three-day selling wave began February 3 with $272.02 million in outflows, followed by the streak’s largest single-day withdrawal of $544.94 million on February 4.

February 5 recorded $434.15 million in Bitcoin ETFs redemptions before buying pressure resumed.

February 2 briefly interrupted the selling with $561.89 million in inflows, but failed to establish sustained surge.

Total net assets fell from $100.38 billion on February 2 to a low of $80.76 billion on February 5 before recovering with February 6’s inflows.

Grayscale’s mini BTC trust attracted $20.13 million while the primary GBTC product recorded zero flows. Invesco’s BTCO posted $6.97 million in inflows. Valkyrie’s BRRR, Franklin’s EZBC, WisdomTree’s BTCW, and Hashdex’s DEFI all recorded zero activity.

BlackRock’s IBIT maintains $61.84 billion in cumulative net inflows. Grayscale’s GBTC holds -$25.88 billion in net outflows since converting from a trust structure.

Fidelity’s FBTC has accumulated approximately $11.08 billion in cumulative inflows based on available data.

Ethereum posts $21 million in outflows as BlackRock withdraws

Ethereum spot ETFs recorded $21.37 million in net outflows on February 6 despite Bitcoin’s reversal to positive flows.

BlackRock’s ETHA accounted for $45.44 million in redemptions, offsetting positive flows from four other products.

Bitwise’s ETHW led Ethereum inflows with $11.80 million, followed by Grayscale’s mini ETH trust at $6.80 million, VanEck’s ETHV at $3.01 million, and Invesco’s QETH at $2.45 million. Grayscale’s ETHE, Franklin’s EZET, and 21Shares’ TETH recorded zero flows.

Total net assets for Ethereum products fell to $10.90 billion from $13.69 billion on February 2. Cumulative total net inflow dropped to $11.80 billion.

Ethereum has posted outflows in three of the past four trading days, with February 4 and 5 recording $79.48 million and $80.79 million in withdrawals respectively.

February 3 provided brief relief with $14.06 million in inflows before redemptions resumed.

TLDR:

• January 2026 recorded 108,435 layoffs, the highest January figure since the 2009 recession period.

• Job openings plummeted to 6.54 million while hiring plans hit record lows at just 5,306 in January.

• Housing market shows 47% more sellers than buyers, creating 630,000 excess sellers—a record imbalance.

• Corporate credit stress affects 14-15% of bond segments as inflation trends below 1%, risking deflation.
  

The U.S. economy faces mounting questions about a potential recession as critical economic indicators deteriorate across multiple sectors.

January 2026 witnessed 108,435 announced layoffs, the highest January figure since the 2009 recession, raising alarm bells about economic health.

Labor market weakness, housing imbalances, and credit stress are converging in patterns that historically precede economic contractions, prompting analysts to assess whether the nation is approaching a downturn.

Labor Market Collapse Points Toward Economic Slowdown

The labor market is delivering the strongest early warning signals of potential recession, with job data weakening at an alarming rate.

According to Bull Theory, a market analysis platform, the situation is particularly concerning because “jobs usually weaken before the economy officially slows.”

Weekly jobless claims jumped to 231,000, exceeding expectations and indicating more workers are filing for unemployment benefits.

This acceleration in layoffs suggests companies are not conducting normal seasonal restructuring but preparing for significantly weaker growth ahead.

Bull Theory emphasized that January’s layoff numbers represent something more serious, noting “that is not normal seasonal restructuring” but rather “companies preparing for weaker growth ahead.”

Job openings have fallen sharply to approximately 6.54 million according to JOLTS data, marking the lowest level since 2020.

When job openings decline while layoffs simultaneously increase, displaced workers face fewer opportunities for reemployment.

Hiring has effectively collapsed, with companies announcing just 5,306 hiring plans in January, the lowest level ever recorded for that month. Businesses are freezing expansion rather than growing their workforce, a clear sign of anticipated economic weakness.

Housing and Bond Markets Flash Recession Warnings

The housing market is displaying critical recession indicators through unprecedented imbalances between supply and demand.

Approximately 47% more sellers than buyers currently exist, equal to roughly 630,000 excess sellers representing the widest gap ever recorded.

Bull Theory analyzed this phenomenon, explaining that “when sellers heavily outnumber buyers, it means people want liquidity” as they prefer “cash instead of holding property risk.”

Housing slowdowns create cascading effects throughout the broader economy, impacting construction, lending, materials, and employment sectors simultaneously.

When real estate transactions freeze, the economic slowdown broadens beyond housing into adjacent industries. Consumer confidence surveys are already showing multi-year lows as job uncertainty spreads, leading households to reduce spending on homes, cars, travel, and discretionary purchases.

The Treasury yield curve is bear steepening again, with long-term yields rising faster than short-term rates near four-year highs.

Investors are demanding higher returns to hold long-term U.S. debt, reflecting concerns the analysis identifies as worries about “fiscal deficits, debt levels, and long-term growth outlook.”

Historically, yield curve shifts of this nature have preceded recessions multiple times, making the current trend particularly concerning for economic forecasters.

Credit Stress and Deflation Risks Intensify Recession Probability

Corporate credit markets are showing dangerous stress levels, with approximately 14% to 15% of certain bond segments either distressed or facing high default risk.

When companies encounter debt pressure, they respond with aggressive cost-cutting measures including layoffs, reduced spending, and halted expansion.

Business bankruptcy filings have been climbing steadily, disrupting supply chains and removing liquidity from the financial system.

Another overlooked recession risk involves disinflation moving dangerously close to deflation territory. Real-time inflation trackers like Truflation show inflation trending near or below 1%, far beneath the Federal Reserve’s 2% target.

Bull Theory warned that “if inflation falls too fast, spending slows because people expect lower prices later,” adding that “deflation cycles are historically more damaging than inflation.”

The Federal Reserve maintains a relatively hawkish tone despite weakening forward indicators, continuing to emphasize inflation risks while labor, housing, and credit data soften.

Bull Theory assessed the overall situation, stating that when combining all these factors, “you get a macro backdrop that historically aligns with late-cycle slowdown phases.”

However, the analysis clarified that “this does not mean recession is officially here yet” but rather “the economy is becoming fragile and markets are starting to react to that risk.”

Bitcoin’s sharp decline — nearly 50% from its all-time highs reached just months ago — has reignited debate over the cryptocurrency’s stability, but hedge fund veteran Gary Bode says the selloff is a feature of the asset’s inherent volatility rather than a sign of a broader crisis.

In a post on X, Bode noted that while the recent price drop is “unpleasant and jarring,” it is not unusual in bitcoin’s history. “80% – 90% drawdowns are common,” he said. “Those who have been willing to stomach the always-temporary volatility have been well-rewarded with incredible long-term returns.”

Much of the recent turbulence, he said, can be traced to market reactions to the nomination of Kevin Warsh to succeed Jerome Powell as Federal Reserve chair. Investors interpreted the move as a signal that the Fed might adopt a hawkish stance, raising interest rates and making zero-yield assets such as bitcoin, gold, and silver relatively less attractive. Margin calls on leveraged positions amplified the decline, causing a cascade of forced selling.

Bode, however, disputes the market’s interpretation. He pointed to Warsh’s public statements supporting lower rates and notes from President Trump suggesting Warsh promised a lower fed funds rate. Combined with Congress’ ongoing multi-trillion-dollar deficits, Bode argued, the Fed has limited ability to influence longer-term Treasury yields — a key factor in corporate borrowing and mortgage rates. “I think the market got this one wrong” he said, emphasizing that perception, rather than fundamentals, drove much of the recent selling.

Other commonly cited explanations, he said, also fail to tell the full story. One theory is that “whales” — early bitcoin holders who mined or purchased coins when prices were near zero — are offloading holdings. While Bode acknowledges that large wallets have been active and some big sellers have emerged, he frames these moves as profit-taking rather than an indication of long-term weakness. “The technical skill of the early adopters and miners is something to be applauded,” he said. “That doesn’t mean that their sales (full or partial) tell us much about the future of bitcoin.”

Bode also flagged Strategy ($MSTR) as a potential source of short-term pressure. The company’s stock fell after bitcoin slid below the prices at which Strategy purchased many of its holdings, prompting fears that Saylor might sell. Bode described this risk as real but limited, comparing it to when Warren Buffett buys a large stake in a company: investors like the support but worry about eventual sales. He stressed that bitcoin itself would survive such events, though prices could temporarily dip.

Another factor is the rise of “paper” bitcoin — financial instruments such as exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and derivatives that track the crypto asset’s price without requiring ownership of the underlying coins. While these instruments increase the effective supply available for trading, they do not alter bitcoin’s hard cap of 21 million coins, which Bode said remains a crucial anchor for long-term value. He drew parallels to the silver market, where increased paper trading initially suppresses prices until physical demand pushes them higher.

Some analysts have suggested that rising energy prices could hurt bitcoin mining and reduce the network’s hash rate, potentially lowering long-term prices. Bode calls this theory overblown.

Historical data shows that past bitcoin price drops did not consistently result in hash rate declines, and when declines did occur, they lagged months behind the price drop.

He also pointed to emerging energy technologies — including small modular nuclear reactors and solar-powered AI data centers — that could provide low-cost power for mining in the future.

Bode also addressed critiques that bitcoin is not a “store of value.” While some argue that its volatility disqualifies it from this role, Bode points out that nearly every asset carries risk — including fiat currencies backed by heavily indebted governments. “[…] Gold does require energy to secure unless you’re comfortable leaving it on your front porch,” he said. “Paper Bitcoin can influence the short-term price, but long-term, there are 21MM coins that will be issued and if you want to own Bitcoin, that’s the real asset. Bitcoin is permissionless and requires no trust in a counterparty.”

Ultimately, Bode’s assessment frames the recent decline as a natural consequence of bitcoin’s design. Volatility is part of the game and those willing to endure it may ultimately be rewarded. For investors, the key takeaway is that price swings, no matter how dramatic, are not necessarily a signal of systemic risk.