Connect with us

Crypto World

Crypto Google Searches Plummet to 1-Year Lows Amid Market Crash

Published

on

Google worldwide search volume for “crypto” is hovering near a one-year low as investor sentiment cools amid a broad market downturn that has trimmed the crypto market’s total capitalization from a peak above $4.2 trillion to roughly $2.4 trillion. The global Google Trends reading for crypto sits at 30 out of 100, with the 12-month high of 100 last reached in August 2025 when market fervor and valuations were at their peak. In the United States, the pattern mirrors the wider trend but with its own rhythm: after a July high of 100, US search interest dipped below 37 in January and then rebounded to 56 in the first week of February. Taken together, these metrics paint a cautious mood among retail and institutional participants alike.

Google search data has long been used by market observers as a proxy for investor interest and potential turning points, aligning with sentiment gauges such as the Crypto Fear & Greed Index. As liquidity has cooled and volatility has persisted, traders and long-term holders have faced a challenging environment where on-chain activity and capital flows tighten alongside waning enthusiasm for risk-on bets in the crypto space. The juxtaposition of dwindling searches with continuing headlines about market stress underscores a market that remains sensitive to macro headlines, policy signals, and evolving risk appetites.

Google search data is often used as a gauge of investor sentiment and corroborates other indicators that track crowd psychology across the crypto market. As the broader market contends with macro headwinds, retail chatter and social signals continue to reflect a cautious stance, even as some pockets of volatility persist.

Investor sentiment craters as Fear & Greed Index hits record lows

The Crypto Fear & Greed Index plunged to a record low of 5 on Thursday, before ticking up to 8 by Sunday, according to CoinMarketCap. Both readings sit in the “extreme fear” territory, signaling widespread risk aversion among market participants. The latest readings echo sentiment conditions observed during past downturns, including periods that followed the Terra ecosystem collapse and the associated de-pegging event in 2022. CoinMarketCap notes that extreme fear can coexist with abrupt bursts of selling pressure, creating environments where short squeezes and liquidity gaps become more pronounced.

Advertisement

In broader terms, sentiment has moved in lockstep with price action and liquidity constraints. The market’s mood now resembles the climate seen after the Terra collapse, when contagion fears and leverage-induced liquidations amplified downside pressure. The Terra incident, which destabilized the Terra ecosystem and its dollar-pegged stablecoin, remains a reference point for how quickly confidence can erode in a highly correlated sector. The event set in motion cascading liquidations that helped accelerate a protracted bear phase in 2022, a period that many participants say still informs risk management and portfolio construction today.

The dialogue around sentiment is also fed by data-driven signals from analysts tracking social conversations and on-chain indicators. Santiment has highlighted a sharp decline in positive versus negative commentary, with crowd sentiment skewing heavily negative as traders search for a bottom to time their entries. While some investors seek capitulation points as an opportunity to accumulate, others remain wary of premature bets in an environment where liquidity can tighten quickly and price swings remain pronounced.

CoinMarketCap Fear & Greed Index plunges to record lows

The broader mood is reinforced by market structure data: daily aggregate crypto trading volume has fallen markedly from a high near $153 billion on Jan. 14 to around $87.5 billion most recently, underscoring the retreat in participation and the challenge of sustaining momentum in a risk-off regime. These shifts in activity, combined with sentiment indicators, paint a picture of a market that remains fragile and sensitive to macro catalysts and policy developments. Investors are paying closer attention to how institutions and retail players reposition their risk budgets in the face of ongoing volatility and mixed fundamentals.

Why it matters

At a fundamental level, the convergence of weak search interest, suppressed trading volumes, and extreme fear in sentiment indices matters for participants across the crypto ecosystem. For traders, the current environment reinforces the importance of risk controls, liquidity considerations, and disciplined position sizing, given the potential for rapid shifts if macro catalysts improve or if liquidity flows reaccelerate. For builders and developers, the mood underscores the need for clarity around use cases, real-world utility, and user acquisition strategies that can drive sustained engagement even when markets are challenged.

Advertisement

From a retail vantage point, the data suggest that casual interest is not being replaced by immediate price upside; rather, attention remains episodic, with bursts around major headlines and then a reversion to the mean. This dynamic can affect onboarding curves for new users and the cadence of education and tooling that platforms rely on to convert curiosity into participation. Meanwhile, for institutions, the subdued atmosphere might translate into more selective allocations, tighter diligence, and a wait-and-see posture as they gauge how the regulatory and macro landscapes unfold in the coming quarters.

The Terra episode remains a salient reminder of how quickly sentiment can flip when confidence erodes and liquidity drains. In such environments, risk models that emphasize stress-testing, collateral management, and scenario planning can be more valuable than outright exposure bets. Investors should remain mindful of the connections between search behavior, sentiment, and price action, recognizing that public interest can act as a leading indicator of potential market inflection—but not a reliable predictor on its own.

What to watch next

  • Continuing Google Trends updates on crypto search interest (worldwide and US) to spot any turning points in public curiosity.
  • Monitoring the Crypto Fear & Greed Index and related sentiment metrics on CoinMarketCap and comparable aggregators.
  • Observing developments around Terra’s ecosystem and the future trajectory of LUNA, as well as any regulatory or governance signals affecting stablecoins and cross-chain liquidity.
  • Watching liquidity dynamics and macro flows, including ETF-related product activity and institutional risk appetites, to gauge potential shifts in market participation.

Sources & verification

  • Google Trends data for Crypto worldwide and US searches (Google Trends links in the article).
  • CoinMarketCap Fear & Greed Index page for sentiment data.
  • CoinMarketCap charts page for market volume trends.
  • Terra ecosystem collapse coverage and its impact on market psychology and liquidity (2022 references cited in the article).
  • Santiment research and weekly summaries on crowd sentiment and social signals.

Market reaction and key details

What the data collectively suggest is a crypto market that remains highly sensitive to macro dynamics, liquidity conditions, and high-profile narrative events. The decline from a peak market cap above $4.2 trillion to roughly $2.4 trillion reflects not only price moves but also a broad retrenchment in risk appetite and a retreat by weaker hands who fueled the late-2021 to mid-2025 hype cycle. The rebound in US search interest in early February indicates that public attention can snap back, but whether that translates into durable capital inflows remains uncertain. As one anchor of the ecosystem, Bitcoin (CRYPTO: BTC) continues to lead price discovery, even as broader market participation ebbs and flows in response to evolving fundamentals and sentiment.

Terra’s collapse and the subsequent liquidity shock provided a stark reminder of how correlated risk exposures can be, particularly when leverage is high and confidence deteriorates. The reverberations from that event still inform risk controls, governance discussions, and the pace at which new products attempt to attract capital in a cautious environment. In the near term, the market will likely hinge on macro signals, regulatory clarity, and the interplay between sentiment indicators and actual on-chain activity.

Why it matters (expanded)

For users and investors, the current climate underscores the importance of diversification, prudent risk management, and clear investment objectives. It also highlights the value of staying informed through reliable data sources and avoiding overreliance on short-term sentiment alone. For builders in the space, the message is to emphasize tangible use cases, security, and user-friendly tooling that can withstand periods of market stress. For the market as a whole, the ongoing scrutiny around liquidity, regulatory development, and institutional participation will shape the trajectory of adoption and the resilience of the sector to shocks.

Advertisement

Ultimately, the story is one of a maturing market that continues to wrestle with volatility, narrative risk, and the pace of innovation. As investors weigh risk-adjusted returns in a downbeat environment, the data offer a sober reminder: interest can surface quickly, but sustained participation requires credibility, resilience, and real-world utility that transcends cycles.

What to watch next

  • Weekly updates on Google Trends for crypto and related terms to identify shifts in public interest.
  • Monitoring the Fear & Greed Index for potential signals that market psychology is shifting toward a more constructive phase.
  • Tracking Terra-related developments and the performance of its associated assets, including governance updates and liquidity restoration efforts.

Sources & verification

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Quantum Computers Need Millions More Qubits to Break Bitcoin, CoinShares Reports

Published

on

Existing encryption types - pre and post quantum

TLDR:

  • Breaking Bitcoin encryption requires quantum computers 100,000 times more powerful than today’s technology
  • Only 10,200 BTC in legacy addresses could cause market disruption if suddenly compromised by quantum attack
  • Cryptographically relevant quantum computers unlikely to emerge before 2030s, according to CoinShares analysis
  • Bitcoin can adopt post-quantum signatures through soft forks while maintaining defensive adaptability

 

Quantum computing poses no immediate threat to Bitcoin’s security infrastructure, according to digital asset manager CoinShares.

The firm’s latest analysis dismisses concerns about near-term vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency’s cryptographic foundation.

Current quantum technology remains decades away from breaking Bitcoin’s encryption protocols. CoinShares estimates only 1.7 million BTC faces potential exposure, representing 8% of total supply.

The research suggests institutional investors should view quantum risks as manageable engineering considerations rather than existential crises.

Advertisement

Technology Requires Decades Before Becoming Cryptographically Relevant

CoinShares’ analysis reveals breaking Bitcoin’s secp256k1 encryption demands quantum systems with millions of logical qubits.

Current quantum computers operate at approximately 105 qubits, falling dramatically short of required thresholds.

Existing encryption types - pre and post quantum

Source: CoinShares

Researchers estimate attackers would need machines 100,000 times more powerful than today’s largest quantum systems.

Advertisement

Reversing a public key within one day requires 13 million physical qubits and fault tolerance levels not yet achieved.

Breaking encryption within one hour would demand quantum computers 3 million times more advanced than current capabilities.

Each additional qubit makes maintaining system coherence exponentially more difficult, according to technical experts.

Cybersecurity firm Ledger’s Chief Technology Officer Charles Guillemet provided expert perspective on the technical challenges facing quantum development.

Advertisement

Speaking to CoinShares, Guillemet emphasized the massive scale required for cryptographic attacks. “To break current asymmetric cryptography, one would need something in the order of millions of qubits. Willow, Google’s current computer, is 105 qubits. And as soon as you add one more qubit, it becomes exponentially more difficult to maintain the coherence system,” Guillemet confirmed.

CoinShares projects cryptographically relevant quantum computers may not emerge until the 2030s or beyond. Long-term attacks on vulnerable addresses could take years to complete even after technology matures.

Short-term mempool attacks would require computations finishing in under 10 minutes, remaining infeasible for decades ahead.

Limited Vulnerability Concentrates in Legacy Address Formats

The digital asset manager’s research identifies exposure primarily in legacy Pay-to-Public-Key addresses holding roughly 1.6 million BTC.

Advertisement

Modern address formats including Pay-to-Public-Key-Hash and Pay-to-Script-Hash conceal public keys behind cryptographic hashes. These contemporary formats maintain security until owners actively spend their funds.

CoinShares determined only 10,200 BTC sit in outputs potentially causing market disruption if compromised suddenly.

Distribution and amount of quantum vulnerable coins

Source: CoinShares

The remaining vulnerable coins distribute across 32,607 individual outputs of approximately 50 BTC each. Breaking into these addresses would require millennia even under optimistic quantum advancement scenarios.

Advertisement

Bitcoin’s security framework relies on elliptic curve algorithms for authorization and SHA-256 hashing for protection.

Quantum algorithms cannot alter Bitcoin’s fixed 21 million supply cap or bypass proof-of-work validation requirements.

Grover’s algorithm reduces SHA-256 security effectively but brute-force attacks remain computationally impractical.

Renowned cryptographer Dr. Adam Back addressed Bitcoin’s capacity for defensive evolution in response to future quantum threats.

Advertisement

The Blockstream CEO and Bitcoin contributor explained the network’s adaptability to CoinShares. “Bitcoin can adopt post-quantum signatures. Schnorr signatures paved the way for more upgrades, and Bitcoin can continue evolving defensively,” Back told CoinShares.

Users retain sufficient time to migrate funds voluntarily to quantum-resistant addresses. Market impact appears minimal, with vulnerable coins likely resembling routine transactions rather than systemic shocks.

 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Are Non-Financial Use Cases in Blockchain Dead?

Published

on

Decentralization, Social Media, Web3, Web3 Decentralization Initiatives

Prominent crypto venture capitalists are clashing online about whether non-financial use cases in crypto, Web3, and blockchain have failed due to a lack of investor demand and product-market fit or if the best days for non-financial applications still lay ahead.

The debate started on Friday when Chris Dixon, a managing partner at venture capital firm a16z crypto, published an article arguing that years of “scams, extractive behavior and regulatory attacks” were the reason that non-financial use cases in crypto have not taken off.

These use cases include decentralized social media, digital identity management, decentralized media streaming platforms, digital rights platforms, Web3 video games and more.

Decentralization, Social Media, Web3, Web3 Decentralization Initiatives
Over $60.7 million in fees were paid over the last 24 hours to crypto exchanges and decentralized finance applications. Source: DeFiLlama

“Non-financial use cases for crypto have failed because no one wants them,” Haseeb Quereshi, a managing partner at crypto venture firm Dragonfly, said in a response on Sunday. He added:

“Let’s just admit it. They were bad products. They failed the market test. It was not Gensler or Sam Bankman-Fried (SBF) or Terra that caused these things to fail; it was that no one wanted any of it. Pretending otherwise is coping.”

Dixon said that as a16z crypto’s funds are managed with at least a 10-year time horizon, “building new industries takes time.”

Advertisement
Decentralization, Social Media, Web3, Web3 Decentralization Initiatives
The top 10 crypto applications by fee generation and revenue are all financial use cases. Source: DeFiLlama

“You don’t have the luxury of ‘waiting to be right’ in VC,” Nic Carter, the founding partner of venture firm Castle Island Ventures, said in a reply to Quereshi. “You need to be right about a market during the 2-3 year fund deployment period,” he said. 

The debate follows a surge of VC investment into crypto projects in 2025, which mostly flowed to tokenized real-world assets (RWAs), physical or traditional financial assets represented onchain by digital tokens.

Related: Web3 revenue shifts from blockchains to wallets and DeFi apps

Different approaches to portfolio building

Dragonfly’s portfolio is built around financial use cases and blockchain infrastructure that helps move value and risk through the onchain financial system.

Some of the firm’s investments include the Agora stablecoin and payments platform, payments infrastructure provider Rain, synthetic dollar issuer Ethena, and the Monad layer-1 blockchain network.

Advertisement