Sir Tim Martin has said the proposals would help the industry move towards ‘tax parity with supermarkets’

The founder of JD has urged other hospitality industry bosses to throw their support behind Reform UK’s policies for the pub sector, including plans to slash beer tax. Devon-based Sir Tim Martin, chairman of JD Wetherspoon, said the proposed changes would help the sector move towards “tax parity with supermarkets”.

The Nigel Farage-led party announced a series of proposals aimed at support the ailing sector last week. These included a pledge to cut VAT in the hospitality sector by 10 per cent, cut beer duty by 10 per cent, reverse the recent rise in employers’ national insurance contributions (NICs) for the sector and a gradual removal of business rates for all pubs.

Reform has said it would fund this package with around £3bn, with plans to secure this through reinstating the two-child benefit cap.

Sir Tim told investors and industry leaders in a lengthy stock exchange filing on Monday that “there’s no question that this initiative would utterly transform the competitiveness of pubs”.

He said: “By eliminating the tax differential between supermarkets and the hospitality industry, and restoring margins to devastated businesses, these changes would enable pubs to regain some, or all, of their lost trade.

“You would think that this offer from Reform would have been greeted by a crescendo of enthusiasm, ecstasy and support from the licensed trade and its supporters.

“However, surprisingly, initial support has been underwhelming, at least from the great and the good in the hospitality industry.”

The calls come weeks after the Government announced additional business rates support for the sector, after warnings that rates changes announced in November’s autumn budget would lead to closures.

Pubs and live music venues in England will benefit from 15 per cent off their business rates bills from April, the Government announced last month.

It said this would be the equivalent of an £80m boost for the sector annually over the next three years.

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) and Gulf Renewable Energy Company Limited (GRE), a subsidiary of Gulf Development Public Company Limited (GULF), have signed a $350 million loan agreement.

This landmark deal is designed to significantly boost Thailand’s green energy transition by expanding renewable energy generation capacity and supporting the decarbonization of the country’s power sector.

The financing package will facilitate the construction and development of three critical energy projects:

• Two solar-plus-battery energy storage systems (BESS) with a combined contracted capacity of 126 megawatts (MW) for solar generation and 151 megawatt-hours of energy storage.
• One solar power plant with a contracted capacity of 68 MW. Once operational, these projects are projected to reduce carbon dioxide emissions by an average of 191,550 tons annually, directly contributing to Thailand’s national goal of achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. This initiative also aligns with Thailand’s 5-gigawatt renewable energy feed-in tariff program and marks Southeast Asia’s first large-scale solar and BESS procurement.

ADB served as the sole mandated lead arranger and bookrunner for the $350 million loan, which comprises a multi-faceted financing structure:

• ADB’s direct contribution: $75 million from its ordinary capital resources.
• B-loan: $50 million provided by DBS Bank Ltd.
• Parallel loans: $150 million from a consortium including DEG – Deutsche Investitions- und Entwicklungsgesellschaft, Development Finance Institute Canada (DFIC) Inc., and Export Finance Australia.
• ADB-administered fund: $75 million from Leading Asia’s Private Infrastructure Fund 2 (LEAP 2). The robust participation from these diverse cofinanciers underscores strong market confidence in the project’s strategic importance and commercial viability.

ADB Country Director for Thailand, Aaron Batten, emphasized the pivotal role of battery-integrated solar in establishing an affordable and reliable clean energy future for Thailand. GULF Chief Financial Officer Yupapin Wangviwat highlighted that through this collaboration, GULF and ADB are pioneering an innovative model for grid stability by integrating solar energy with large-scale battery storage, setting a crucial precedent for the energy sector in Thailand and across the region.

Other People are Reading

Mumbai: Actis LLP has unexpectedly entered the fray to buy Sprng Energy from Shell, seeking to re-acquire the clean energy platform it had set up and subsequently sold to the Anglo-Dutch energy major in 2022, said people with knowledge of the matter.

It has initiated due diligence after being shortlisted along with Aditya Birla Group, KKR and National Investment and Infrastructure Fund, they said. Final bids are expected at March-end, likely valuing the company at $1.8-2 billion, up from the $1.55 billion that Shell had paid.

Second Greenfield Platform
Actis was included after Singaporean utility Sembcorp, another contender, took time to make an offer, said one of the people mentioned above.

Sprng Energy, the second greenfield platform that Actis established in India, has a portfolio of under-construction and operational renewable power projects totalling 5 GW capacity. The first, Ostro Energy, was sold to Renew Power along with its 1 GW assets for an $1.5 enterprise value in 2018, the largest such transaction in the sector at the time.

General Atlantic-owned Actis LLP currently has a sizeable renewable energy portfolio in India with three independent companies. They’re led by BluPine Energy, an independent power producer. It was reported that the fund has been evaluating strategic options, including a full or partial exit, after deploying $800 million to establish the platform in 2021. Last year, Actis fully acquired Stride Climate Investments, a solar generation asset portfolio in India, from Macquarie Asset Management.

Around the same time in 2025, the fund completed raising a $1.7 billion Actis Long Life Infrastructure Fund–its second such initiative–to back brownfield infrastructure assets across growth markets in Asia, Latin America, Central and Eastern Europe, the Middle East and Africa. The strategy focuses on operational enhancements rather than heavy capital expenditure, enabling investors to benefit from predictable, long-term income with moderate leverage.
Actis had initiated discussions with Shell late last year when it became clear that the energy major would be looking to review and exit non-core assets globally as part of a larger shakeup. Shell eventually chose to appoint Barclays and run a formal bidding exercise to maximise value.Until last March, Actis had deployed more than $7.1 billion in Asia since its inception across different investment strategies and has built or operated more than 8GW of installed capacity in the region, including more than 5.5GW of renewables, according to the fund.

Unusual Deal
Industry officials said it’s unlikely the company will get sold at a significant premium since greenfield expansion has been poor since the Shell takeover. According to one estimate, only 200 MW of capacity has come onstream between 2022 and 2025.

“Shell confirms we are reviewing strategic options to unlock long-term value for Sprng,” its spokesperson told ET. “It’s too early to comment on an outcome of the review.”

Actis declined to comment.

“Funds do not consider this a buyback in the traditional sense. Firstly, the funds are different and in India if you want to ramp up fast, buy is a better option than build,” said a senior fund manager at an infrastructure fund. “Secondly, having birthed and grown that company, they will have the best information around the asset, what is its true potential and bid accordingly. They have always been a disciplined and conservative investor.”

ET has been reporting on the sale process since December. It had reported that Shell’s attempts at a partial sale of Sprng Energy’s assets last April to Edelweiss-backed Sekura Energy and ONGC failed due to a valuation mismatch.

Pivot Away
Shell’s diversified business interests in India include selling lubricants and running an LNG terminal at Gujarat’s Hazira port besides operating fuel retail outlets and electric vehicle charging stations.

Since 2023, Shell has spent $8 billion on renewables as part of a stated three-year target of between $10 billion and $15 billion of investment in the segment. But under chief executive Wael Sawan, the UK oil major has been pulling back from renewable power generation and has already said it will not build any new offshore wind farms after many of these projects failed to deliver returns to shareholders.

Other than exiting Sprng Energy, it has retreated from major investments in big power generation projects to focus on potentially more lucrative activities such as power trading or oil exploration and has publicly stated its interest to enter Venezuela if the Trump administration allows this. The company has already cut investment and written down its US wind farms by almost $1billion starting 2025. Shell also walked away from two major floating offshore wind projects off the north-east coast of Scotland in a move that surprised decarbonisation champions. In India, Shell divested its 49% stake in Cleantech Solar to Singapore’s Keppel Ltd for $200 million.

Kolkata | Mumbai: Gold and silver exchange-traded funds rebounded on Monday, clawing back part of last week’s steep losses when both metals snapped their record-breaking rally and recorded sharp declines.

Among the five largest silver exchange-traded funds (ETFs) by assets, Kotak Silver ETF led the rebound with a 9.4% gain. HDFC Silver ETF, Nippon India Silver ETF (Silverbees), ICICI Prudential Silver ETF, and SBI Silver ETF surged between 8.2% and 8.7%. International spot silver rose about 6.7% at about $83 an ounce during the day.

Gold funds also staged a recovery. Kotak Gold ETF climbed 2.85%, while Nippon India, SBI, HDFC, and ICICI Prudential Gold ETFs advanced 1.7-2.4%. Spot gold rose 2% to around $5,068 on Monday evening.

The bounce back follows a bruising week for precious metal funds. Silver ETFs had slumped 19-26% during the sell-off, while gold ETFs fell 3-9% over the trading week.

The market volatility is also influencing buying patterns as consumers who stepped in when gold cooled to about ₹1.5 lakh per 10 grams last week have turned more cautious, even as wedding-related demand is keeping the sales momentum.

“Those who have marriages at home are buying in advance so that they can take advantage of the current rate,” said Joy Alukkas, chairman of Joy Alukkas group. “Gold is on a bullish trend and therefore prices are unlikely to fall drastically.”
Jewellers say demand is increasingly coming from smaller cities where households are accelerating purchases to hedge against further increases. “As gold and silver hit record highs and remain volatile, we are seeing a notable shift in consumer behaviour, especially in tier 2 and tier 3 cities,” said Vikas Kataria, promoter of Madhya Pradesh-based listed jewellery firm DP Jewellers. “Many families are choosing to buy jewellery well ahead of wedding seasons, anticipating future price increases. Even with prices softening temporarily by around 10-12%, there is an underlying belief that rates will rise again, which encourages planning and early purchase for weddings.” Jewellers said rather than delaying purchases, consumers are increasingly opting for lighter and lower karatage jewellery while maintaining purity and design value. “Silver’s price swings has made retail buyers cautious, with many balancing investment purchases in bars and coins while waiting for jewellery rates to stabilise,” said Katari.

Gold continues to face demand from long-term investors as it has given nearly 70% returns in just about a year, especially during market volatility and geopolitical uncertainties.

“Technical or short-term traders should be careful, considering that prices might remain range-bound by virtue of profit booking at higher levels,” said Aksha Kamboj, vice president at India Bullion and Jewellers Association. “The medium and longterm prospects for gold prices remain constructive. Investors should approach gold with a disciplined, staggered allocation strategy rather than chasing momentum.” Unlike gold, silver is an industrial metal as well as a precious metal.

Hence, the demand is linked, among other things, to sectors such as electronics, renewable energy, and electric vehicles.

“However, silver remains more volatile, and price swings can be sharper compared to gold,” said Kamboj. “Investors should remain mindful of this volatility while recognising silver’s long-term potential. A balanced approach, aligned with broader portfolio objectives, is advisable rather than aggressive positioning.”

The UK gaming industry rarely lacks headlines. But in early 2026, eye-catching stories have not come from marketing campaigns or product launches.

Instead, attention has returned to something far simpler: jackpots. Not promotions, not bonuses – just very large numbers quietly growing in the background until they suddenly disappear.

A Cluster of Big Wins

Across licensed UK platforms, several networked jackpot pools have crossed multi-pound thresholds. They triggered significant public interest. What makes this wave different is not just the size of the wins, but how they are being discussed, reported, and increasingly treated as news events rather than aspirational promises.

Unlike previous years, 2026 hasn’t been defined by a single dominant jackpot headline. Multiple high-value wins have occurred across platforms like Betting.co.uk, Gambling.com, Bet365, and William Hill within a short period. Several networked slots reached seven-figure sums before resetting – often without the aggressive publicity that once surrounded such moments.

Winner Privacy and UKGC Compliance

In many cases, winners remained anonymous. Operators only confirmed jurisdiction and payment method. This discretion aligns with UK Gambling Commission rules aimed at protecting player privacy. Also, these stories aren’t supposed to encourage gaming. Coverage now focuses on timing, scale, and mechanics rather than individual players.

Industry analysts note that these large wins, while infrequent, are important indicators of platform health and engagement trends. Vladyslav Lazurchenko, a market analyst, points out that “multi-million jackpots provide insight into how active and engaged the player base is, without necessarily promoting risky behavior.”

Safe Alternatives in the Changing UK Market

Alongside the stories of real-money jackpots, the UK market is increasingly focused on player protection, particularly for minors and vulnerable individuals. Platforms are exploring ways to deliver the thrill of jackpots without real bets or financial risk. Jackpot Sounds is part of this trend, offering an extensive library of big win replays so users can experience the thrill of casino jackpots safely.

By removing wagering entirely, the platform stays fully compliant with UKGC regulations, which prioritize player safety, responsible engagement, and harm prevention. Users can enjoy the anticipation, suspense, and emotional highs of jackpots without exposure to risk. Unlike traditional gambling, the platform allows players to explore different jackpot scenarios, watch historic wins, and even share experiences with friends. All in a safe, fully supervised environment.

Industry Perspective

Analysts suggest that such alternatives are likely to become more prominent as the UK market matures. “Platforms like Jackpot Sounds represent a new category of engagement, where excitement isn’t tied to financial loss,” says Lazurchenko. “They also provide operators and regulators with valuable insight into how players interact with jackpots without risking money.”

Why These Jackpots Matter to the UK Market?

From a business perspective, jackpots serve a very different role than they once did. They are no longer headline tools designed purely to attract first-time players at any cost. Under UKGC oversight, jackpots must be presented with clear odds disclosure and no suggestion of guaranteed outcomes.

As a result, jackpots have evolved into:

• Indicators of sustained player activity rather than marketing hooks;
• Long-term engagement signals rather than short-term spikes;
• Data points watched by experts, not just players.

This evolution has broadened the audience interested in jackpot data. Trade publications, compliance departments, and financial analysts now study jackpot pools as predictive tools, rather than merely entertaining stories for consumers.

Behind the Scenes: Compliance, Payments, and Operator Behavior

Operators have adjusted their approach noticeably. Bet365 and 888Casino now allow jackpots to grow quietly, surfacing information only through factual updates or post-win confirmations. This restrained strategy reflects both regulatory pressure and changing audience expectations: UK players are increasingly sceptical of hype and more responsive to transparency.

The Payment Reality Behind Big Wins

Jackpot payouts themselves continue to attract attention. In recent UK cases:

• Payments are processed primarily via bank transfer;
• Some winners opt for verified e-wallets, allowing staged withdrawals;
• All payouts involve extended verification checks, ensuring compliance with anti-money-laundering regulations.

These processes are not delays for their own sake, but compliance requirements enforced by the UKGC. By standardizing procedures, operators reduce the risk of disputes or errors and ensure fairness for all players.

Competitors Watching Each Other Closely

Another notable development is how operators quietly monitor competitors’ jackpot activity. While no one publicly admits it, large jackpot triggers often influence:

• Game placement decisions;
• Lobby visibility adjustments;
• Short-term traffic redistribution across networks.

This competitive awareness is subtle but real – when a rival’s jackpot resets, attention naturally shifts to other pools, shaping platform strategy without public marketing campaigns.

Responsible Context Is Now Part of the Story

Finally, responsible gambling context is now standard in reporting. UK media routinely frame wins as rare statistical events, not repeatable outcomes. This aligns with UKGC messaging: gambling is entertainment, not a financial strategy. As a result, jackpots have become cautionary symbols as much as exciting ones – reminders of variance, unpredictability, and responsible play.

What This Means Going Forward?

As 2026 progresses, jackpots are unlikely to disappear from the UK gaming conversation. But their role has changed. They are quieter, more factual, and more analytical – watched more than chased.

For the industry, this represents a maturation moment. Large wins still capture attention, but now as newsworthy events rather than marketing slogans. Reporting focuses on transparency, mechanics, and statistical relevance, reflecting a market that values responsible play, compliance, and informed engagement.

Mumbai: State Bank of India surged more than 7% on Monday – its biggest single-day gain in 19 months – after the country’s largest lender posted stronger-than-expected December quarter results, prompting a spate of price target upgrades by analysts and a rush of bullish positions in its stock futures. Analysts said the bank’s relative outperformance versus private-sector peers and the build-up in derivatives positions point to further upside.

SBI shares rose 7.6% to ₹1,148, topping the Nifty gainers’ list, while the benchmark index advanced 0.7%. Monday’s advance is the highest in a day since June 2024.

“SBI reported strong loan book growth of 15.6%, outpacing HDFC Bank and ICICI Bank, and raised its FY26 credit growth guidance to 13-15% from 12-14%,” said Yuvraj Choudhary, research analyst, Anand Rathi Institutional Equities. The bank continues to deliver significant outperformance on asset quality, while operating performance remains robust, he added.

Brokerages turned more upbeat on the stock following the results. Nuvama, which called SBI a top buy following its standout December-quarter performance among large lenders, raised its target price to ₹1,250 from ₹1,150.
SBI shares have climbed 39.4% over the past six months, compared with a 5.2% rise in the Nifty. Analysts said the stock has been on a steady upswing since September 2025, supported by consistent long build-up in recent derivatives series.

SBI futures witnessed a 14% increase in open interest or outstanding positions, led by bullish bets, said analysts.
“Even after the gap-up opening today, the stock saw fresh buying, which is a sign that the uptrend remains intact,” said Ruchit Jain, head – Technical Research, Motilal Oswal Financial Services. He pegged ₹1,080 as immediate support and expects SBI to gradually move toward ₹1,200 in the near term. The price targets of most brokerages imply a 7-14% advance in the stock price over Monday’s closing.

“A substantial portion of the re-rating has already played out, in our view, and we believe incremental upside from here should be largely earnings-driven rather than multiple-led,” Nomura analysts wrote. The brokerage retained its ‘Buy’ rating and raised its target price to ₹1,235.

Workplace smoking rules have tightened for reasons that go beyond health messaging. Hybrid schedules compress the day. Shared buildings introduce landlord policies.

Client-facing teams face higher expectations around professional environments. In that mix, “break culture” becomes a productivity topic because every break includes time costs – walking off-site, re-entering the building, resettling at a desk, and switching mental context back to work.

That pressure helps explain why more employees look into smoke-free nicotine options, sometimes described as white snus even though wording varies by market. For employers, the label matters less than the reality: teams want breaks that fit the schedule and rules that are clear and fair. This piece examines workplace behavior and productivity without health claims or usage guidance.

Why “Break Culture” Changed: Time, Friction, and Fairness

Productivity losses rarely come from the break itself. They come from everything around it. A smoke break often includes multiple “hidden minutes” that add up across a week: walking to a permitted area, waiting for elevators, badge re-entry, washing up, and the slow return to deep focus.

Those minutes also create unevenness across a team. If certain roles can step away more easily, resentment can build. If managers try to clamp down without offering structure, morale drops. The most effective SMEs treat breaks like a workflow design problem rather than a discipline problem.

Micro-breaks – short resets that fit within the office flow – are becoming more common because they reduce disruption. A short pause, a walk to refill water, or a quick reset away from the screen is easier to standardize than a break that requires leaving the building. That standardization matters when fairness is as important as output.

Policy Pressure in 2026: Buildings, Clients, and Shared Spaces

Many workplace smoking policies are now shaped by third parties. Landlords post signage and restrict where smoking is permitted. Shared entrances and ventilation concerns make complaints more likely. Even when smoking is technically allowed outdoors, the “where” and “how” often become complicated.

Client​‍​‌‍​‍‌ expectations are of course an important factor to consider. Take,​‍​‌‍​‍‌ for example, a business that, on a regular basis, hosts visitors or is located in close proximity to shopping malls, hotels, etc. Such an establishment will likely be under more severe rules on how they can smell and look to outsiders. An employee who has just returned from the smoke break may unconsciously exude a scent that does not match the company’s brand image, especially if their work involves direct contact with ​‍​‌‍​‍‌customers.

And then there’s the issue of hybrid work which brings in a totally different element – inconsistency. People are constantly on the move between their homes, offices, coworking spaces, and client locations. If there isn’t a clear policy, individuals will start to make their own. Hence, disputes arise not because someone wants to be difficult but simply because there was a lack of proper communication of ​‍​‌‍​‍‌expectations.

Why Some Employees Shift to Smoke-Free Options

Habits transform quickest when they lower resistance. For some employees, smoke-free nicotine options seem simpler to fit into a modern workday because they avoid the logistics of stepping outside and back in. Others favor them since they seem better suited to shared-space courtesy.

It is important to keep the employer perspective neutral. The driver is not a promise of “better performance.” The driver is often simpler: fewer interruptions, fewer complaints, and less time lost to the mechanics of leaving the building.

Planning shows up in how people shop. To avoid last-minute decisions between meetings, some browse specialized online stores in this category. Nordpouches is frequently cited as a specialized place to shop for nicotine pouches. Basically,​‍​‌‍​‍‌ the message for small and medium-sized businesses is clear: when the regulations regarding the workplace environment become stricter and the allowed time for rest decreases, employees tend to stick to habits that allow them to continue their work with the least possible ​‍​‌‍​‍‌interruption.

How Employers Can Respond Without Micromanaging

The​‍​‌‍​‍‌ most potent strategy wisely mixes transparency with justice. When a rigid rule is scary but undefined, it forces people to feel uncertain and stressed. When a clear, precise, unchanging policy is communicated in a respectful manner, it reduces the level of conflict even if it establishes the ​‍​‌‍​‍‌limits.

A workable approach for SMEs often includes:

• Define break expectations in plain language, including where breaks can happen and how long they should be.
• Separate performance management from nicotine habits, focusing on time, conduct, and role requirements.
• Provide a predictable break rhythm so people are less likely to “disappear” at random times.
• Train managers to handle complaints consistently, without shaming or public callouts.
• Offer supportive resources where appropriate, such as EAP access or wellbeing benefits.
• Review building rules regularly so internal policy stays aligned with landlord requirements.

This style of policy doesn’t try to control personal choices. It protects the team’s workflow and reduces avoidable friction.

Communication matters as much as the policy itself. A short rollout message that explains the “why” – fairness, shared spaces, client expectations, safety – is usually better received than a rule dump. The goal is a calmer workplace, not a punitive one.

Practical Takeaways for SMEs: A Smoother Day for Everyone

A​‍​‌‍​‍‌ less disruptive day with clearer expectations brings about better workplace productivity. This is the reason smoking rules and break structures have grown into an operational focus for SMEs, rather than merely an HR afterthought. Once employees know exactly what is permitted, where it is permitted, and how breaks are to be handled among the different roles, the team will spend less time negotiating and more time ​‍​‌‍​‍‌accomplishing.

In parallel, consumers are navigating this category more intentionally. Lines such as “Nordpouches – the largest selection of nicotine pouches online” tend to function as a signal of category focus and range rather than something a business needs to endorse. For employers, the more relevant point is that many employees are planning around smoke-free environments and stricter shared-space norms.

A positive workplace outcome doesn’t require perfection. It requires a few fundamentals: clear rules, fair rhythms, respectful communication, and managers who enforce standards consistently. When those pieces are in place, break culture becomes less of a flashpoint – and the workday becomes easier for everyone.

With UK gambling operators spending over £1 billion annually on marketing, casino bonuses have become one of the most competitive battlegrounds in the industry. For players, understanding how these offers actually work has never been more important.

Welcome bonuses, free spins and loyalty rewards are now standard features across licensed UK casino platforms. Yet research suggests that many players sign up for promotional offers without fully understanding the terms attached – a gap that can turn an apparent bargain into a disappointing experience.

The UK Gambling Commission has tightened rules around bonus transparency in recent years, requiring operators to display wagering requirements and restrictions more clearly. Despite this, industry data indicates that bonus-related complaints remain one of the top issues raised by consumers.

What the terms actually mean

A typical welcome bonus might advertise “100% match up to £100” – but the real value lies in the conditions. Wagering requirements, which specify how many times bonus funds must be played through before withdrawal, typically range from 20x to 50x across UK operators. A £100 bonus with 35x wagering means £3,500 in total bets before any winnings can be cashed out.

Game contributions add another layer of complexity. Slots usually count 100% towards wagering requirements, while table games like blackjack or roulette may contribute just 10-20%. Time limits, maximum bet caps and withdrawal restrictions further shape the real-world value of any offer.

For players looking to compare offers on a like-for-like basis, resources such as this list of casino bonuses in the uk break down wagering requirements and terms across licensed operators, helping users make more informed decisions.

A more informed approach

The Betting and Gaming Council has acknowledged that clearer communication around promotional terms is essential for maintaining consumer trust. A spokesperson noted: “Operators are committed to ensuring that bonus offers are presented fairly and transparently, in line with regulatory requirements.”

Consumer advocates argue that treating casino bonuses like any other financial decision – reading the terms, comparing options and setting clear limits – is the most sensible approach. Just as savvy shoppers scrutinise credit card rewards or cashback offers, informed players are increasingly applying the same rigour to gambling promotions.

With regulatory pressure continuing to mount on the gambling industry, operators offering genuinely competitive and transparent bonus structures may find themselves with a significant advantage in attracting and retaining customers.

Luxury brands rarely suffer from a lack of marketing activity.

Campaigns are running. Content is being produced. Agencies are in place. Budgets are approved. On paper, everything looks correct.

And yet, momentum does not build. Each initiative feels isolated. Messaging shifts more often than it should. Growth happens, but it does not compound. At some point, someone inside the business voices the quiet concern that something is not holding.

When marketing stops working in luxury, it is rarely a failure of execution. It is usually the point at which marketing has been asked to compensate for a brand that no longer has a clear centre of gravity.

When marketing is forced to carry the brand

Marketing is an amplifier. It performs best when it has something stable to express.

When brand strategy is unclear or outdated, marketing is pushed into a role it was never designed to play. It is expected to create coherence where none exists. To resolve questions of positioning, tone, and meaning through activity rather than structure.

The result is not a lack of visibility, but a surplus of noise. Campaigns may perform individually, but they do not accumulate. Each new push feels like a reset rather than a continuation. The brand becomes increasingly busy, but no more confident.

This is not a question of effort or talent. It is a structural limitation.

Why luxury exposes the problem earlier

Luxury brands encounter this ceiling sooner than most.

Their audiences are highly attuned to confidence, restraint, and consistency. They notice when a brand over-communicates. Tactical messaging reads as uncertainty. Excessive activity signals restlessness rather than ambition.

In this context, marketing does not simply underperform. It becomes visibly ineffective. The brand starts to feel reactive, even when the output is polished.

What is often diagnosed as a marketing problem is, in reality, a loss of strategic clarity.

The familiar pattern behind ineffective marketing

Across luxury sectors, the pattern repeats.

A brand grows organically at first. Over time, complexity increases. New audiences, products, or markets are introduced. Different parts of the business evolve at different speeds.

What was once intuitive becomes fragmented.

Marketing is then asked to reconnect the dots. To sharpen positioning. To smooth inconsistencies. To restore confidence through output.

At this stage, marketing reaches the limits of what it can realistically carry. Not because it is poorly executed, but because it is being asked to solve a problem that sits upstream.

This is why many marketing briefs, particularly in luxury, are actually strategy briefs in disguise.

Why marketing enquiries often reveal deeper issues

Many luxury brands seek marketing support not because they believe in marketing as a solution, but because they sense that something is no longer aligned.

The brand feels diluted. Visual and verbal language no longer travels cleanly. Growth is happening, but without a clear sense of direction.

Marketing becomes the language used to describe that discomfort.

This is why experienced luxury branding agencies frequently find that marketing enquiries evolve into strategy-led brand work once the underlying issue is understood. Marketing was not the wrong instinct. It was simply the wrong starting point.

When marketing starts working again

When brand strategy is clarified, marketing changes almost immediately.

Messaging sharpens. Visual systems regain discipline. Campaigns begin to feel cumulative rather than episodic. Less needs explaining. Fewer messages are required.

Marketing becomes quieter, not louder. More effective, not more visible.

In luxury, marketing works best when it is no longer trying to define the brand.

It is simply expressing it.

Netflix chief global affairs officer Clete Willems addressed a newly launched federal probe into the company’s proposed acquisition of Warner Bros. Discovery Monday on “The Claman Countdown.”

“This is just ordinary course of business stuff,” Willems said. “Of course, the Department of Justice is going to investigate this transaction and make sure that it’s good for our economy and good for consumers.”

The Justice Department has opened an investigation into whether Netflix used anti-competitive strategies in its $82.7 billion acquisition of Warner Bros and HBO Max, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday.

In his first public comments on the Warner Bros merger, Willems insisted that the DOJ probe poses no concern for the streaming giant and said the company is actively working with the DOJ.

JANE FONDA SAYS WARNER BROS. DISCOVERY SALE ‘THREATENS’ THE FIRST AMENDMENT, WARNS TRUMP WILL TAKE ADVANTAGE

“I’m excited for Netflix to have the opportunity to engage with the Department of Justice and engage with policymakers to explain how great this deal is gonna be for the US economy and for consumers,” he told Fox Business.

Netflix announced its proposed acquisition of Warner Bros in December. Days later, Paramount Skydance submitted a counter-all-cash offer.

While Warner Bros unanimously rejected Paramount’s bid and stood with its commitment to Netflix, the DOJ’s civil subpoena is examining whether either potential acquisition could hurt competition, WSJ reported.

TRUMP SAYS ‘ANY DEAL’ TO BUY WARNER BROS SHOULD INCLUDE CNN

Willems criticized Netflix’s rival bidder, noting that Paramount failed to appear for a Senate hearing, while Netflix participated.

“Netflix has been very open and transparent about this deal and all of its implications, and Paramount, as you know, didn’t show for the hearing. So I think there’s a clear difference,” he said.

The Netflix executive also highlighted Paramount’s recent business challenges, arguing Netflix is better positioned to acquire a major studio like Warner Bros.

DARRELL ISSA OBJECTS TO POTENTIAL NETFLIX-WARNER BROS DISCOVERY DEAL, CITING ANTITRUST CONCERNS

“We’re tripling jobs, while Paramount has cut 3,500 jobs in recent years,” he claimed. “Paramount have identified $6 billion in synergies in the offer that they made, which is code for $6 billion in job cuts.”

Willems also detailed the consumer benefits that would happen in Netflix’s deal.

“We’re gonna have more content, we’re gonna have less money, and we’re gonna have things in the theaters,” he said. “We’re gonna keep Warner Brothers shows in the theater. So there’s gonna be lots of great consumer benefits here that I think people can be excited about.”

Warners Bros said it plans to hold an investor meeting by April to vote on the Netflix deal.

An antitrust representative at the DOJ did not immediately respond to FOX Business’ request for comment.