While the genocidal assault on Gaza continues, Israel has stepped up a campaign of terror in the Occupied West Bank. Fearing for his life, Waleed Samer, a linguistics student who has helped The Real News film an original documentary in the West Bank over the past year, documents the day-by-day reality of living under Israel’s occupation and tells the story of his family’s harrowing escape from their Nur Shams refugee camp in the West Bank city of Tulkarm. This is his story.

Filmed by Waleed Samer
Production, voice-over, and editing by Ross Domoney

Transcript

Waleed Samer: 

Hi everyone. How are you? My name is Waleed Samer, 20 years old. 

Ross Domoney [Narrator]:

Life in Waleed’s refugee camp has become unbearable.

Waleed Samer:

Ok there is a lot of snipers around me. If I open my door they will kill me. Why I will try [to go outside]? I will not try. I will stay in my house. 

They [the Israeli army] took my grandfather’s land in 1948. So maybe this is the second chance to take my land [here] in the camp. 

Ross Domoney [Narrator]:

With only a handful of armed Palestinian fighters left, Waleed fears his camp is about to be overtaken by the army.

Waleed Samer: 

Are you worried about your cat?

Waleed’s little sister: 

Yeah.

Waleed Samer:

Because of the army?

[Waleed’s little sister nods.]

Ross Domoney [Narrator]:

Over a period of ten days, Waleed sent us footage from his phone. The Israeli army is raiding his camp on a near daily basis. Small windows of time allow for him to go outside.

Waleed Samer:

It’s like a battle here. Look what they are doing. 

Ross Domoney [Narrator]:

Nur Shams refugee camp was established by Palestinians who fled their native lands in the 1948 Nakba, where Zionist militias displaced and killed thousands to create what is today known as the state of Israel.

This is Ross Domoney reporting for The Real News. In April this year, myself and my colleague Antonis Vradis met Waleed in his camp whilst filming a documentary. He helps connect journalists like us to stories in his community so that he can fund his education. Now, months later, his ability to study or even to eat has been severely restricted as the army cuts off food and water to his camp.

Waleed Samer:

This is my brother. He wears a black t-shirt. He’s going to get some hummus and falafel. 

It’s my [first] breakfast [in] two days. We must have bread to eat [with] that. But we are really hungry. 

Ross Domoney [Narrator]:

Another day, another raid. Waleed Films from his balcony.

Waleed Samer:

Many people in the camp now if you can listen… Many people are in a stress[ful] situation and they are just trying to get out [of] the camp but they can’t. So the situation now is very dangerous. 

Ross Domoney [Narrator]:

A brief lull in the Israeli assault allows for a funeral. The leader of the camp’s battalion is buried. A farewell gun salute… A chance to go out again and signs that the army is still facing resistance.

Back at home, his parents grow increasingly worried for the safety of their children and discuss the possibility of leaving Palestine. Waleed, like any other 20-year-old, would like to relax and enjoy life.

Waleed Samer:

I don’t have any dreams here. My future here [is not] clear. I don’t know what will happen [to] me in the next one hour maybe. No one knows what will happen [to] him. So I [imagine] I have a good future in my life: I can go out and continue my study in good universities, see the people [outside] of Palestine, [outside] of the West Bank. I can move freely. No one can attack me. No one can arrest me.

Hello?

Antonis Vradis – Lecturer at St Andrew’s University:

Waleed!

Waleed Samer:

Hi habibi how are you? 

Ross Domoney [Narrator]:

Waleed gets a call from Antonis about a program that might be able to help him study.

Antonis Vradis – Lecturer at St Andrew’s University:

My university here in Scotland has a scholarship that is specifically for Palestinian students. 

Waleed Samer:

That’s nice. 

Antonis Vradis – Lecturer at St Andrew’s University:

Yeah. 

Waleed Samer:

Just imagine I finish my bachelor’s and go to Scotland university and take the masters. Oh that would be great. Every woman in life would come and marry me. The life in the last maybe three-four months has become worse here. [There is] no work or money. I don’t have the costs to pay my university, this is the hardest thing [for] me. Many things have happened. I have just started thinking I have a big future ahead of me. 

Someone [came] into my house and was asking about my dad and [I told] him my dad is not home. He told me take these two cartons of water because the IDF at the last [raid] cut off the water. 

Sitting in my house, opening my phone [to] see what is going on [outside] my house. I need some bread or something to eat. Maybe I was having some bread [or] something to eat yesterday but today I don’t have anything. 

I’m just now trying to go out from my house. When I open the door, I listen if there are any planes [drones] or something like that. I swear there is a plane [drone] above my head just filming me and quickly I close my door and come back to home. I cannot do anything. Really, the situation here is really, really bad. 

Ross Domoney [Narrator]:

Waleed sends me a picture of a charred body. It’s the last remaining fighter from his camp. After that, his messages fall silent. Despite the hardship of life in the West Bank, he would rather stay than leave. But the occupation’s violence left him no choice. Waleed leaves his homeland like his grandfather did in 1948.

Related

Hello and welcome to Working It. I’m Bethan, deputy editor of FT work and careers, standing in for Isabel this week.

Yesterday, John Hopfield and Geoffrey Hinton won the Nobel Prize for Physics for “foundational discoveries” in machine learning and artificial intelligence. Hinton quit Google last year so he could speak more freely about the risks of AI, and he used his acceptance speech to do just that.

The technology, he said, will be “wonderful in many respects”. But we should worry about “bad consequences”. Things could get “out of control”, he added, “we have no experience of what it’s like to have things smarter than us.”

I’m sure Hinton wasn’t talking about recruitment. But the nature of this technology means every sector is already being changed profoundly — including the world of work.

In the past few months, I’ve been reporting on the state of the jobs market — whether employers can find the right people, what jobseekers experience, and whether it is fair and equitable. AI has come up in nearly every conversation I’ve had. More on that below.

Will automation make applying for jobs harder?

In a recent interview, a jobseeker told me a story that made me think.

Struggling, like many candidates, to land an interview, she’d turned to an AI tool that scanned her CV. When she read its automated recommendations, she was surprised. Many of the skills she thought she had included in her resume were flagged as missing.

The problem, it appeared, was that she’d used terms that inferred skills or experience — like the name of employer — but hadn’t clearly articulated specific aptitudes, as they appeared in the job description, in the way automated screening would easily pick up.

“It was a bit of a eureka moment,” she told me. “I realised that unless I used these specific terms, I’d be missed.”

I thought this experience really reflected the weirdness facing job hunters today. You try hard to fluff up your CV and write a characterful cover letter, thoughtfully showcasing your skills. Then it gets fed into a black box and rejected, based on seemingly inscrutable criteria. Are you applying to a person or an automated process? For jobseekers, the uncertainty can feel like shouting into a void.

In the past, stories of mysterious robots were often purely speculative, says recruitment specialist Hung Lee. But increasingly they are more than rumours. Recent product innovations, he tells me, include AI screening assistants — tools he describes as “basically AIs” that “compare CVs (or job applications) against job descriptions” and rank them in order of suitability.

“Previously debunked myths” about automated application processes — such as the idea “that employers had technology that could read CVs and auto-reject them” — are “now becoming reality,” he tells me. And this is leading to an “innovation arms race . . . between tech-enabled candidates and tech-enabled recruiters” as jobseekers learn to tailor their CVs to meet the requirements of the automated screening.

Although most recruitment professionals recognise change is happening, this doesn’t yet amount to an impermeable AI-powered barrier between you and your dream job. According to research by Hays, a recruitment company, in March this year, 4 per cent of organisations — and 11 per cent of very large organisations — said they were currently using AI to evaluate applications, by scoring candidates or scanning CVs. The number is growing: 16 per cent of organisations said they would increase their use of AI to evaluate applications in the future, rising to 36 per cent among very large organisations.

Bonnie Dilber, recruiting manager at workplace tech platform Zapier, believes the idea that job applications are widely judged by AI is a “huge misconception”. While some employers will make use of tools that score candidates based on preset criteria, she says, most do not, in part because products now available are “emerging tools with lots of flaws”. Despite contending with large numbers of applications, many written with the help of AI, humans are still reading CVs, especially at smaller organisations.

I’m not sure this is reassuring for jobseekers, however. Mystery over who — or what — will review your application is not helpful. It hardly makes it easier to craft an application for the greatest chance of success.

For those wishing to “maximise conversions of applications-to-interview”, Lee’s advice is to use AI to customise a CV against specific job descriptions, then manually review it. But he advises, too, that candidates should check first if any use of AI is prohibited. Dilber says the “generic responses” of AI tools are unlikely to be the strongest submission for a competitive role.

It’s also worth remembering, of course, that the experience of being judged in faceless application processes is not totally new. The human judgment that predates any automated screening is (was?) far from perfect. Hurried hiring managers will also scan for keywords and gloss over the nuances of each candidate. When it comes to job applications, new systems are, in many ways, repeating earlier problems. The question is whether they will help solve them — or make them worse.

This week on the Working It podcast

Corporate reorganisations are always a traumatic time for staff and managers, writes Isabel Berwick. That’s true when they happen for “good” reasons — after a merger, for example; or just because a new chief executive wants to “make their mark”.

I have often been struck by how badly most reorganisations are handled (we are all imperfect humans, after all) so for this week’s episode of the podcast I called in two workplace experts. Christine Armstrong is a researcher, speaker — and also the funniest person on LinkedIn. Along with my colleague Andrew Hill, the FT’s senior business writer, we talk about the dos and don’ts of reorganisation.

Five top stories from the world of work

1. What is the point of corporate art collections? Why do big companies collect artwork? Investment and prestige have always been part of the reason, but employers are increasingly using artwork to help tempt their workers back to the office, and strengthen relationships with clients.

2. How Jane Street rode the ETF wave to ‘obscene’ riches: This deeply reported look at an under-the-radar trading company that has become incredibly profitable is packed with fascinating insights, including an unusual approach to risk and hierarchy. 

3. CEOs turn to podcasts to control their messaging: There has been an increase, of late, in the number of senior business leaders using buzzy media productions to communicate with the world. But do these new media offerings fall short of journalism that holds those in power to account?

4. The case for office pettiness: When you send a group email, do you pay much attention to the order of the names of recipients? Perhaps you should. This column shows up some of the ridiculousness of meaningless office disputes — but also acknowledges why they might matter to some.

5. Online gig platforms focus on profits as workers return to office: I’ve always been intrigued by upstart gig platforms that allow people to more easily hire themselves out for one-off tasks. So I enjoyed this look at how names such as Fiverr or Upwork are looking for new ways to boost their profitability after slowing business post-pandemic.

One more thing

Who is government? The question might sound a bit cryptic, but I really enjoyed this Washington Post series answering it. The paper has got some great writers to profile unexpected and influential public servants working for different departments of the US government — from the Department of Justice to Nasa to Veterans’ Affairs, which oversees war cemeteries. Author John Lanchester profiles the Consumer Price Index. It made me think differently about what makes up government and how we think and write about work.

And finally . . . apply for expert AI support (and help develop good governance 🏆)

Isabel Berwick writes: The Institute for the Future of Work (Ifow) is an independent research and development institute. Among other things, it’s the home of the Pissarides Review into the Future of Work and Wellbeing. We’ve covered Ifow’s previous research about the impact on workers of AI and tech in this newsletter.

Ifow is currently running an “open call” for industry partners to join its new “Responsible AI Sandbox”. Intrigued? Here’s what Ifow’s head of partnerships, Jo Marriott, says about it:

“With the need for better governance of workplace AI becoming clear . . . Ifow is looking for businesses from across sectors, which are looking for support as they adopt new technology to improve productivity.

“Within the Sandbox, firms will gain a greater understanding of the risks and opportunities of AI deployment. Through this process, Ifow is helping to shape a pro-innovation approach to AI regulation, and will provide tools and frameworks that give firms the confidence to adopt new AI technologies in ways that support both growth and ‘good work’, and comply with existing legal regimes.”

To learn more and submit an expression of interest, please visit Ifow’s application page.

TESCO shoppers have been left raging after finding out about a major change to car parking rules.

Two branches have implemented restrictions on how long customers can park their vehicles while filling up baskets.

1

One Tesco Extra in Ryde on the Isle of Wight has now put a new policy in place restricting drivers to a maximum three hour stay when there were no restrictions before.

Between 8pm and 12am the maximum stay is now one hour and 30 minutes between 12am and 6am.

Another store in Shaftesbury, Dorset, has reduced the maximum stay for shoppers leaving their vehicles in the car park between 10pm and midnight to one hour and 15 minutes from midnight to 6am.

The Sun understands the new parking restrictions were put in place at the Ryde store this month and at the Shaftesbury Superstore in September.

The move to restrict how long customers can park their vehicles at night has been branded “selfish”, with others claiming it discriminates against shoppers working during the day.

Commenting on the changes at the Ryde store, one shopper said on Facebook: “That’s clearly not been thought about, what happens with shoppers who need longer in the evening or is it going to be a supermarket sweep job and just grab it all while knocking things down and hope for the best?”

Another said: “Oh, great, so those that work in the day, get just one hour to dash round the store, then get in a massive queue at a till because they only have four tills open at one time.

“Discriminate against working customers.”

Commenting on the changes at the Shaftesbury store, one shopper said: “What…….They really are a bloody selfish store. I have never had any problems with parking at any time.

“And sometimes it takes longer than hour to get round the store.”

Another added: “With Christmas approaching it’s going to frustrate people wanting to do late night shopping or early hrs as not enough time allowed!”

Tesco said it doesn’t have parking limits in place at all stores, but uses “local usage” information to put measures in place where needed.

The supermarket also said parking restrictions are managed on a location-by-location basis and any changes are reviewed based on customer feedback.

A spokesperson added: “It is important to us that all our customers can find a space when they visit our stores and, where we have parking limits in place, this is to allow us to better manage spaces, and to deter anti-social behaviour in the car park at night, especially outside of opening hours.”

WHAT OTHER SUPERMARKETS DO

Customers can spend up to two hours in Sainsbury’s car parks for free.

However, some do charge you even for a quick stay, like the Superstore branch on Clapham Common.

Aldi has a limit on how long shoppers can use its car parks before being charged but this varies from store to store.

The retailer says signs are put up at each branch telling you how long you can stay for free and how much it costs beyond this point.

The amount of time you can spend in a Morrisons car park varies from branch to branch with signs in each one telling you how long you can stay for free before you are charged.

Some let you stay overnight for free, like its Aldershot branch where you are not charged for any parking between 5pm and 9am.

The latest change from Tesco is not the first in recent months to spark backlash in recent months.

Earlier this year, the UK’s biggest supermarket started charging shoppers 10p if they wanted to keep clothes hangers, as exclusively revealed by The Sun.

Tesco said it was trialling the new policy in a handful of stores in a bid to reduce plastic waste.

But one angry shopper posted on Facebook: “Never in my life have I heard so much rubbish, Tesco don’t only charge for plastic bags but now for hangers, 10p a hanger. What is the world today?

“I didn’t even want the hanger but was just in shock.”

In August, the supermarket revealed it had gone cashless at 40 of its cafes across the UK.

Shoppers have since had to order their food and drinks on a digital self-service screen and pay by card.

Martin Quinn, of Campaign for Cash told The Telegraph: “Many of the customers will be elderly or retirees who want to order in person, not press a computer screen. This is a mad decision.”

Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.

Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories

The next Conservative leader will be from the right wing of the party.

The surprise elimination on Wednesday of the final moderate Tory candidate in the race — James Cleverly — leaves Tory party members with a choice between Kemi Badenoch and Robert Jenrick.

Both have set out a staunchly right-wing prospectus, proposing a smaller state, a crackdown on immigration, and outlining scepticism about net zero targets.

As leader of the opposition, the winner will hold Sir Keir Starmer to account each week at Prime Minister’s Questions in the Commons — and will hope to lead the Tory party into a general election within the next five years.

Kemi Badenoch

Kemi Badenoch was the bookmakers’ favourite going into the Tory leadership race this summer.

The former business secretary has styled herself as a truth-teller who will deliver difficult messages to the party, which she says needs to rebuild from first principles.

She has said truth, family, citizenship, personal responsibility and equality under the law are the principles that would underpin her leadership.

Allies say she has the most intellectual critique of where the party should go, publishing a 40-page pamphlet during the party conference entitled “Conservatism in Crisis: Rise of the Bureaucratic Class”.

Her contention is that this ballooning group, who inhabit roles linked to the state, is socially intolerant and driving an economic slowdown.

She describes herself as a “net zero sceptic”, has challenged views around the rights of transgender people, and revels in attacking what she proclaims to be “left-wing nonsense”.

Known for her pugilistic style and sometimes brusque manner, her critics say she would cross a road to get into an argument, and wanders too easily into controversy. She says she fights on behalf of her party, not with it.

During the party’s annual gathering she sparked rows with suggestions that maternity pay was “excessive” and that the minimum wage too great a burden on some businesses.

Badenoch, 44, also raised eyebrows by signalling the public may back a move to charge for access to healthcare and suggesting, apparently in jest, that a large number of UK civil servants deserve to be in prison.

A raft of Tory rising stars on the front bench have backed Badenoch during the contest, including former energy secretary Claire Coutinho and former Treasury chief secretary Laura Trott, alongside party grandees such as former Cabinet Office minister Lord Francis Maude.

Born in the UK, she grew up in Nigeria before returning to Britain as a teenager. She studied engineering and worked for private bank Coutts and in a digital role at the Spectator magazine before entering politics through the London Assembly.

Badenoch was first elected to the House of Commons in the Essex seat of Saffron Walden in 2017.

Liz Truss first put her in the cabinet as international trade secretary and women and equalities minister. Rishi Sunak appointed her business secretary.

She ran for leader after Boris Johnson resigned in 2022 and came fourth, a result that gave her the confidence to try again given her low profile going into that race.

Badenoch has two daughters and a son with her husband Hamish, who works for Deutsche Bank.

Robert Jenrick

Robert Jenrick gathered momentum early in the Tory leadership contest, topping the first two MP ballots and impressing colleagues with a slick campaign.

The former communities secretary has focused heavily on immigration, becoming the only candidate vowing outright to quit the European Convention on Human Rights, or ECHR, if he comes to power.

He is also one of only two Tory leadership candidates — the other was Tom Tugendhat — who has called for a concrete ceiling on net inward legal migration to the UK, which he says should be capped at 100,000 people a year.

Jenrick, 42, has said he would reject mass migration, focus on cheap and reliable energy, get Britain building again, cut the size of the state and build a more united country.

He opposes “crazy interim binding targets” on net zero, and has vowed to cut the international aid budget to fund an increase in defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP.

After winning the first two rounds of voting, his momentum had appeared to have stalled, when he lost ground in the third round of voting by Tory MPs on Tuesday.

Tory MPs believed then that his lacklustre speech at the party’s annual gathering in Birmingham last week may have dented his chances.

He also stoked controversy by claiming in a campaign video that Britain’s special forces are “killing rather than capturing terrorists” due to the constraints of the ECHR, raising questions about his judgment.

Jenrick is viewed as a centrist who has tacked to the right in order to curry favour in the race with the party base and MPs. However, some in the Tory fold say he is a natural right winger who kept his true colours hidden during the Coalition years when the party was led by moderate Conservatives.

He backed Remain in the EU referendum, but has since said he would back Brexit if he had his time again.

Last month he told the Financial Times that he believed the Treasury and the UK’s independent fiscal watchdog had been “gaslighting” the British public over the benefits of migration.

Right-wing Tory veterans Sir John Hayes and Mark Francois have backed Jenrick, alongside centrist former health secretary Victoria Atkins.

He won his seat of Newark in a 2014 by-election and joined the government ranks four years later, when Theresa May made him a Treasury minister.

Boris Johnson later made him housing secretary, a job in which he sparked a slew of negative headlines after he approved a controversial planning application submitted by Tory donor Richard Desmond after sitting beside him at a party fundraising dinner.

In 2019 he was one of three rising stars in the Tory party who joined forces to back Johnson for the party leadership — alongside Rishi Sunak and Oliver Dowden.

Friends said he later felt let down when Sunak arrived in No 10 and appointed Dowden as deputy prime minister, but did not give Jenrick a full cabinet role, appointing him immigration minister instead.

Jenrick dramatically resigned from the role around six weeks later, insisted Sunak’s legislation to save his Rwanda deportation plan was too weak to succeed.

He is married to Anglo-Israeli lawyer Michal Berkner, with whom he has three daughters.

IF you’re concerned about keeping warm this winter, turning the heating on doesn’t have to be the only option.

Millions are predicting tough times this winter with an increased energy price cap and a raid on winter fuel payments for pensioners.

1

But with some simple everyday household items, you could prolong having to splash out on bills.

We’ve put together a list of DIY ideas which could add some warmth to you and your home this winter for free.

However, remember that if you are vulnerable due to illness or old age and you’re really cold, you should still turn on your heating.

You should reach out your local council or supplier, and some available schemes will also be detailed at the end of this article.

It is also worth keeping in mind for all readers that the NHS currently advises to switch the heating on when temperatures dip below 15C.

But if you’re simply looking for some new ways to adapt to the colder weather, here are a few basic items you can use.

You likely already have them around the house – meaning it won’t cost you a penny.

Bubble wrap

Yes, bubble wrap. If you have this item lying around your home, you could be just steps away from some free insulation.

DIY buffs have said that if you cut some bubble wrap to fit your window, spray the window with water, then press the bubble side of the wrap against the glass, you can make your own double-glazing.

Bubble wrap is a good insulator as the air gets trapped in the bubbles and reduces heat transfer, preventing it escaping your home.

According to Urbane Eco, around 15% of heat is lost through windows.

And window insulation film can typically reduce heat loss by 35%, while double-glazing saves 70%.

By double glazing your windows, you could save £155 a year and 375kg of carbon dioxide.

While bubble wrap may not be as effective, it certainly helps the cause, and for free – the average cost of secondary glazing is £1,000 to £2,000 per window.

And if you don’t have bubble wrap at home, you can buy 5m for just £1 at Wilko and Asda.

A blanket

Another trick which can help prevent heat from escaping through windows is doubling up your curtains.

Some people buy special thermal curtains for winter, such as a set on Dunelms website which is selling for £145.

However, if you have spare curtains lying around, those will work just as well – if not, you could simply hang up a blanket for extra insulation.

If you really want to block out the cold, you could hang a quilt and attach velcro to the curtain hanger to keep it from being too heavy and falling down.

You should also remember to close your curtains during the night and open them when the sun shines, so your house can soak up all the rays.

Any fabric you have lying around

Another culprit for heat escaping the home are gaps under doors, with heat rising through rooms and up and out the house.

Draft excluders are really useful, and there are some really simple instructions online on how you can make your own.

All you need to do is measure the length of your door or window and cut a piece of fabric, sew it together and fill with stuffing.

With your own creative input and fabric prints you could end up with a prettier product than one you would buy.

If you don’t have the sewing skills then stuffing tights with old T-shirts will do the trick and you can just tie up the ends.

Tape

Another unexpected place where heat may leave your home is your letter-box or cat flap.

Sometimes these are slightly opened without you noticing and bring in cold drafts.

A simple way to patch this problem up is to seal the flap with duct tape.

If you have a cat which likes to go outdoors, you can take this off and put it back on when you need, or just keep an extra eye on when they need to be let out over the colder months.

The same trick works on draughty keyholes too.

Move your rug

Over the winter 10-20% of heat loss happens through floors on average.

Insulating your floor is a good preventative method, but can cost as much as much as £3,000 for suspended insulation, and £80 per square meter on average for solid insulation.

While it may not make quite the same impact, you’ll be surprised how much warmth could be locked in your home by covering drafty floorboards.

By moving your rug, or even your furniture, on top of these areas, you could stop a lot of precious warmth leaving the home.

Newspaper

If you have a chimney, you’ll definitely be using it to stay cosy this winter – but when its not in use, it could actually be costing you money.

All you need is a bin bag filled stuffed newspaper to fill your fireplace to stop heat escaping.

According to the chimney draught excluder brand Chimney Sweep, preventing chimney draught can cost you around £90 per year and reduce bills by about 5%.

Aluminium foil

If you are turning your heating on, it really helps to make sure you’re making the most of it.

DIY lovers have discovered they can attach aluminium foil to a large square of cardboard and place it behind their radiator so it reflects extra heat into the home and away from walls.

By enhancing your radiator use, you could have it on for less time over the day.

If you’re really worried

We’d like to remind readers that while these hacks are useful, they won’t always cut it if you’re struggling with bills this winter.

If you are in this position you could be eligible for the Household Support Fund, and information is available via the Gov.uk website.

Plenty of energy suppliers are also offering support schemes for customers, such as Octopus Energy which is offering pensioners discretionary credit of between £50 and £200 this winter.

To find out what help your supplier is offering, ring their phone line or visit their website.

Some energy support funds are also offering free electric blankets to customers who are struggling this winter.

OVO and Octopus Energy are both suppliers who have aimed at “heating the human, not the home”.

Octopus have said they will distribute 20,000 electric blankets from Dreamland to its most vulnerable customers, keeping them warm for “as little as 3p an hour”.

While OVO Energy has launched a £50 million Extra Support Package which includes complimentary energy-conserving items.

Electric blankets are also sometimes available from your council under the Household Support Fund, which renews a fresh pot of £421 million today.

To find out if this is available with your supplier or council, and whether you are eligible, go to their websites and read the terms and conditions of the scheme.

Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.

Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories