John Nugent, 86, died at his address on Singleton Grove, Westhoughton on Friday, February 6.

Officers have stated that there are no suspicious circumstances surrounding his death.

GMP shared the appeal to help trace the relatives of people who have died before establishing a cause of death.

In UK law, there is no legal definition of “next of kin”, but it is usually understood to be the closest relative, whether a partner, parent, child or sibling.

It is believed John, who was born in Ireland, had previously lived in Farnworth and lived in Altrincham before that.

So far, no members of John’s family have come forward.

Those with more information should Call the Police Coroner’s Office on 0161 856 4687 as soon as possible.

The Cleveland Police officer is subject to a disciplinary hearing next month following reports of his behaviour from more than three years ago.

It is alleged that between July and October 2022, Officer X subjected Officer A to unwanted and/or inappropriate behaviour. The behaviour of Officer X was such that Officer A requested they never be crewed together again.

Read more:

Thereafter, Officer X continued to subject Officer A to unwanted and/or inappropriate behaviour. This was also at a time when Officer A was in their probationary period.

And a second allegation on the force website states that between June and October 2022, Officer X subjected Officer B to unwanted and/or inappropriate behaviour. This was also at a time when Officer B was in their probationary period.

The officer is accused of breaching the standards of professional behaviour for police officers, specifically the standards relating to equality and diversity as well as authority, respect and courtesy.

The disciplinary hearing will take place at Scotswood House, Thornaby Place, Thornaby, next month.

LIVIGNO, Italy (AP) — As the Winter Olympics opened in Milan, Vice President JD Vance hailed the competition as “one of the few things that unites the entire country.”

That unity didn’t last long.

The early days of the Milan Cortina Games have been roiled by the tumultuous political debate in the U.S. American athletes have faced persistent questions about President Donald Trump’s aggressive immigration enforcement agenda and their comfort in representing a country whose policies are increasingly controversial on the world stage.

“There’s obviously a lot going on that I’m not the biggest fan of and I think a lot of people aren’t,” American freestyle skier Hunter Hess said as he spoke of the “mixed emotions” of representing the U.S. “If it aligns with my moral values, I feel like I’m representing it. Just because I’m wearing the flag doesn’t mean I represent everything that’s going on in the U.S.”

That prompted a fast response from Trump, who said on social media that Hess was a “real loser” who “shouldn’t have tried out for the team.”

“Very hard to root for someone like this,” the president added.

The criticism of an American athlete from a U.S. president was a sharp departure from the unifying, apolitical tones the White House typically strikes during the Olympics, highlighting how the tension over the enforcement of Trump’s immigration policies has now bled into athletic competition. Other leading conservative voices, ranging from podcaster Megyn Kelly to a Republican candidate for governor in Florida, added to the critique of Hess, with some calling for him to be taken off the U.S. team.

By Monday, other top athletes who have previously found themselves in political controversy were rallying to Hess’ defense.

“In moments like these, it is really important for us to unite and kind of stand up for one another for all that’s going on,” said Chloe Kim, the two-time Olympic gold medalist whose parents are South Korean immigrants and who has faced racism throughout her career for her Asian heritage.

After her silver-medal win in slopestyle, Eileen Gu, who was born in San Francisco and competes for China, said she had been in touch with Hess, who told her she was one of the few people who could relate to what he’s going through.

“As someone who’s been caught in the crossfire before, I feel sorry for the athletes,” said Gu, whose decision to compete for China drew sharp critiques.

The Olympics are never walled off from politics

The Olympics are never walled off from political and cultural debates. The raised fists of Tommie Smith and John Carlos during the 1968 Olympics remain one of the most powerful and enduring images of protest and resistance to racial injustice in the U.S. Since then, political commentary from athletes has become more commonplace, aided by social media platforms that allow competitors to share their real-time thoughts on everything from food and nutrition to news of the day.

The comments from athletes in Italy are notable, however, because they’re coming at the biggest global sporting event to occur since federal agents killed two U.S. citizens in Minneapolis last month, reigniting a debate in the U.S. and abroad over Trump’s hard-line immigration measures.

Chris Lillis, another American freestyle skier, said he felt “heartbroken about what’s happening in the United States.”

“As a country, we need to focus on respecting everybody’s rights and making sure that we’re treating our citizens as well as anybody with love and respect,” he said. “I hope that when people look at athletes competing in the Olympics, they realize that that’s the America that we’re trying to represent.”

Skiing star Mikaela Shiffrin quoted Nelson Mandela as she acknowledged “a lot of hardship in the world globally, and there’s a lot of heartbreak, there’s a lot of violence.”

“It can be tough to reconcile that when you’re also competing for medals in an Olympic event,” she said. “I’m really hoping to show up and represent my own values, values of inclusivity, values of diversity and kindness and sharing, tenacity, work ethic, showing up with my team every single day.”

For the most part, athletes are largely engaging in political conversation during news conferences when they’re specifically asked to respond to news events. At one such press event, American figure skater Amber Glenn, an outspoken LGBTQ+ rights activist, noted that the queer community is going through a “hard time” under Trump. She later said she would step back from social media after receiving threats on the platform.

Political controversy can put athletes at an uneasy intersection as they weigh whether to use their platforms to take a stance or avoid anything that might upset their fans or sponsors. During last month’s Australian Open tennis tournament, American Amanda Anisimova said questions about U.S. politics were not “relevant.” Another American player, Taylor Fritz, said he felt that “whatever I say here is going to get put in a headline and it’s going to get taken out of context.”

“So I’d really rather not do something that’s going to cause a big distraction for me in the middle of the tournament,” he said.

Back at the Olympics, U.S. speedskater Casey Dawson, said “we definitely know the whole situation going on in the USA” while noting that “politics don’t apply to us” at the Games.

“We’re here to skate,” said Dawson, who finished eighth in the men’s 5,000 meters on Sunday with Vance and his family in the stands. “We’re here to skate. We’re here to perform.”

The spotlight on the U.S. that comes with global sports will only intensify in the coming years. The U.S., along with Canada and Mexico, will host this year’s World Cup and the 2028 Summer Olympics will be held in Los Angeles. While there’s little chance that political tensions in the U.S. will ease in that time, some hope that sports will serve as a way for people to process their disagreements and ultimately come together.

“There’s this really magical thing that sport can do,” said Ashleigh Huffman, who was the chief of sports diplomacy at the State Department during the Biden and first Trump administrations. “It can lower the temperature of the room.”

___

Sloan reported from Washington. Associated Press writers Howard Fendrich and Graham Dunbar in Milan contributed to this report.

The leader of Hong Kong has celebrated the 20-year jail sentence given to British pro-democracy campaigner Jimmy Lai, saying the media tycoon had “poisoned” the city.

John Lee was defiant in the face of criticism from Western nations, including the UK, following the 78-year-old’s sentencing yesterday.

He was found guilty ​of two counts of conspiracy to collude with foreign forces and one ​count of publishing seditious materials last December.

Mr Lai denied all the charges and said he was a “political prisoner” facing persecution from Beijing. His son, Sebastien, told Sky News it was “essentially a life sentence… a death sentence”.

Sir Keir Starmer had been under pressure to raise Mr Lai’s case with China’s Xi Jinping when he visited the country last month.

While the government is seeking closer economic ties with Beijing, Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper said Mr Lai’s prosecution was “politically motivated” and expressed concern for his health.

But China remains defiant despite the criticism, which has also come from the likes of the US and the UN.

China’s London embassy described Ms Cooper’s comments as “erroneous”, and accused the UK of “interfering in Hong Kong’s rule of law”.

Since Mr Lai was sentenced, the Beijing regime has released a white paper outlining plans to further enhance a draconian national security law that has been used to clamp down on free speech and dissent in Hong Kong.

Read more:
What is the China’s national security law?

The city, which Britain handed over in 1997, was the scene of huge pro-democracy protests in 2019. The white paper described the security law as a “legal shield” that had restored order.

Mr Lee said Mr Lai’s sentencing sent a “solemn warning against malicious plots” that endanger national security, and welcomed the white paper’s publication.

Mr Lai’s sentencing came more than five years after he was arrested. The founder of the now defunct Apple Daily newspaper is a long-standing critic of ⁠the Chinese Communist Party.

‘The embodiment of what they fear’

Speaking after the verdict, Sky’s Asia correspondent Helen-Ann Smith said she spoke to Mr Lai’s biographer Mark Clifford last month.

“He’s really the embodiment of what they fear,” she cited the author and close friend of the jailed tycoon as saying.

“A principled person, absolutely refusing to back down, smart, articulate, and crucially with a platform.”

The site of Tudhoe Grange School, on Durham Road, was transformed into a 1960s police station for the seventh series of Inspector George Gently, the long-running BBC crime drama starring Martin Shaw and Lee Ingelby.

For several months, the disused school building served as the show’s production base while four 90-minute episodes were filmed across County Durham and the wider North East.

Tudhoe Grange School in Spennymoor (Image: GOOGLE MAPS)

Classrooms were converted into offices and interview rooms, while the frontage was dressed with period police cars and signage to match the drama’s 1960s setting.

At the time, Inspector George Gently was one of the BBC’s most successful crime dramas, regularly attracting audiences of around seven million viewers when episodes aired on BBC One later that year.

The decision to film in Spennymoor followed the closure of Tudhoe Grange School in 2012, when it merged with Spennymoor School to form Whitworth Park School and Sixth Form College.

Martin Shaw (Image: ARCHIVE)

While the future of the 100-year-old building was still undecided, its temporary use by the BBC ensured the site remained occupied and maintained.

Plus, with most of the series of Inspector George Gently already filmed in the region anyway, it gave producers a perfect opportunity to use the former school.

BBC representatives at the time said the school was ideally suited to the series, both visually and practically, offering a period-appropriate exterior alongside enough internal space to house sets and production offices.

Tudhoe Grange School in Spennymoor (Image: GOOGLE MAPS)

At the time, the show’s publicist, Deborah Goodman, said: “Period-wise, the school really works for us.

“It has a great frontage to put our sixties police cars out front, and the interior is great; we can make the police station sets work and have enough room for the production team to have its offices there.

“It has made a huge difference to the series to film it where it is supposed to be set, in and around Northumberland.”

Local leaders also welcomed the production, citing economic benefits for nearby businesses and the wider area, as well as the novelty of seeing a familiar local landmark appear on national television.

Now in 2026, the school’s brief transformation remains a notable moment in the town’s recent history.

When they disintegrate, governments often do so slowly, then quickly. Despite dragooned public statements of support from the cabinet, the government of Keir Starmer gives every appearance of entering that second phase.

In the wake of the scandal surrounding former Washington ambassador Peter Mandelson and his ties to deceased sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Starmer lost his chief of staff Morgan McSweeney, who had championed Mandelson for the role. Then the PM lost his press secretary, Tim Allan.

Then, in a live press conference, he lost the leader of the Scottish Labour party, Anas Sarwar. Eighteen months ago, Starmer could not have been closer to Sarwar. Now he has cut his national leader adrift and called for Starmer to resign.

Sarwar is not in Westminster. Sarwar has to fight an election in Scotland in May, and Starmer and the Westminster Labour government has been a liability for Scottish Labour for over a year. Sarwar had to act to have any chance of mounting a challenge against the governing Scottish National Party in those elections.

Sarwar’s actions may be be the most impactful, owing to the political momentum he has now so dramatically accelerated. But McSweeney’s resignation is the more significant development. The last line of defence for a prime minister is their chief of staff, and Sweeney was much more than that.

Party leaders and prime ministers have come not to be able to live without them, but so often are forced to. The chief of staff is part human, part metaphor: a conduit, a pressure valve, a lightning rod.

When forced out, their principal rarely lasts long, albeit as much for the related erosion of their authority as prime minister as in what that chief of staff may personally have provided. But McSweeney, a brilliant electoral tactician and party organiser with no experience of government, was also in the wrong job. And Starmer put him there.

The Mandelson scandal

Much of what is taking place is what takes place when governments are old, or infirm, but much is also new, or at least new in effect. To write a rudimentary historical political equation: Marconi plus Profumo equals Mandelson.

The 1912 Marconi scandal revolved around shady share dealing on the part of those around the chancellor of the exchequer, David Lloyd George. The 1963 Profumo affair involved the minister for war sharing his bed with a woman who also shared hers with the Russian naval attache – and in the year of the Cuban missile crisis.

À lire aussi :
The fall of Peter Mandelson and the many questions the UK government must now answer

Marconi remains the most serious financial scandal in modern British politics, though Lloyd George survived. John Profumo resigned, but for lying to MPs. No secrets were divulged, but the political establishment was discredited, and the lives of young women were ruined. The Mandelson scandal combines both, and to greater effect. And is still ongoing.

The effect of Epstein continues to corrode. Endless news channel recycling of footage of Starmer and Mandelson roaring with tactile laughter as they approach the cameras at the UK embassy in Washington DC only a year ago has become a visual backdrop to the crisis. The king is now routinely heckled in public over Epstein.

The end of the line?

The history of chiefs of staff is a short one. The first chief, indicative of the move to an increasingly presidential premiership, was Jonathan Powell, who served without personal controversy throughout Tony Blair’s decade as prime minister. Fiona Hill and Nick Timothy provided the political smarts for (another politically dysfunctional) prime minister, Theresa May. They accepted responsibility for the disastrous 2017 general election, but only delayed May’s defenestration.

Harold Wilson had his “kitchen cabinet”, including Marcia Williams, Joe Haines and Gerald Kaufman, who damaged the prime minister by osmosis. Margaret Thatcher was too strong a leader to need one, though she had advisers she relied on.

This is potentially much more damaging for Starmer than for any of his predecessors. It is, almost as much if not more so, McSweeney’s government as it is Starmer’s, and Starmer himself is as much McSweeney’s creation as much as he is his own man. It may have been significant that in his resignation statement McSweeney wrote: “I have always believed there are moments when you must accept your responsibility and step aside for the bigger cause.”

The McSweeney project, born in opposition, was to reclaim the Labour party from the Corbynite left, and present it as a competent and moderate alternative to a chaotic and dysfunctional period of Conservative government. Starmer, effectively, was recruited for this job by McSweeney for that purpose. To that extent the 2024 general election revealed the project to have been completely successful. Hundreds of Labour MPs owed their election to McSweeney. But then, what next?

Starmer, as with Tony Blair and David Cameron, became prime minister without any experience of government. Unlike Blair or Cameron, however, he also had no serious experience of politics: hence his need for, and appointment of, McSweeney.

For Starmer, the prime minister is the monarch’s first minister, first lord of the treasury, head of government, minister for civil service; the country’s representative internationally. He has never fully appreciated that the prime minister is also a politician. If they are not, they will soon be found out.

Political skills are not sufficient, but they are necessary. Ted Heath did not have them either, but he at least knew about governing. Starmer was found out some time ago and now a concatenation of circumstance – Mandelson, Allan, Sarwar, the looming byelection in Gorton and Denton (a formally safe seat that Labour looks set to lose), the May elections in Scotland and Wales and in English councils – has provided the moment.

McSweeney’s departure has probably clarified Starmer’s fate – he has never been weaker. But there is still no obvious alternative. This may provide Starmer with the time during which he hopes personnel changes may help provide a reset.

If this is the end for Starmer, a serious and damaging pattern in British politics and public life will have been reinforced. Since David Cameron stepped down in 2016, no prime minister has lasted more than about three years. The impatience and intolerance of voters with the political classes has increased, and will only increase further.

Starmer’s was always a dual leadership, and then premiership, held with someone who effectively saved him the trouble of thinking. He is now on his own.

Lewis Brown was convicted of making indecent images of children in July 2022 and told at the time he would have to tell police if he ever stayed at an address with youngsters present for more than 12 hours.

But he failed to tell police when he stayed at the woman’s home, and she, was shocked when she was later informed of his offending history.

Brown, 24, appeared at Durham Crown Court for sentence having admitted two breaches of a Sexual Harm Prevention Order and one of failing to comply with sex offender notification requirements.

Emily Jo Willis, prosecuting, said Brown was convicted of making indecent images of children in July 2022 and was made subject of registration as a sex offender and a Sexual Harm Prevention Order, both for five years.

Miss Willis said under the notification requirements he had to inform police within three days if he stayed at an address for more than 12 hours where a child was staying.

He was also forbidden from removing files from electronic devices without the permission of his police offender risk manager.

Miss Willis said the defendant met the woman on TikTok and developed a friendship, visiting her in the early hours of November 14, and staying there for two nights.

While he was there, he was said to have spent time with her family, but he did not disclose it to police.

When the police later spoke to her, she provided screenshots showing photos of the defendant in the presence of children.

But the defendant’s device did not include those photos and accompanying conversation, and so he must have deleted them.

The woman who said she knew Brown through friends, but was unaware he was a registered sex offender.

She said she felt ashamed having shared images with him, and she was distressed to learn he was a sex offender and she had not known, adding that she would never have allowed him to stay if she had known.

Miss Willis said although it was, “a deliberate breach”, the phone seized from the defendant contained no “compromising images”, and “no offending material.”

She added: “Although he deleted images of the children, there was no suggestion they were indecent.”

Tyler Plunkett, for Brown, of Margaret Street, Ludworth, said he had a difficult upbringing and disrupted education.

Mr Plunkett said his client’s mental health issues were “relevant” to his commission of the offences, in that he had a fear of rejection, affecting his decision-making.

He said the defendant knew he should not have stayed with the woman, but did it just to progress his friendship with her.

“In hindsight, he accepts it was a foolish thing to do.

“It’s clear he has some deficits with his thinking skills”

Judge Richard Bennett told Brown: “I can imagine the distress that she (the woman) felt when she learned the true picture about your background.”

But he said Brown was “immature” and “emotionally damaged”.

“You have had a period of time in custody to reflect on your behaviour,” he said.

“I believe the most suitable disposal is by way of a lengthy community order.”

He passed a 36-month order, to include 20 days’ attending rehabilitation activity sessions and 26 days’ on an accredited programme, both overseen by the Probation Service.

Brown was warned any further breaches would bring him back to court risking an immediate custodial sentence.

Personal finance expert Gabriel Nussbaum has shared the surprising savings benchmarks that show whether you’re ahead of most Brits – and you might be doing better than you think

Many Brits are concerned about their financial situation, but according to one personal finance expert, they may be better off than expected. Gabriel Nussbaum has revealed a surprising threshold that demonstrates when savers are outperforming the majority of the UK population – and the figures might come as a pleasant surprise.

In a recent TikTok video, Nussbaum outlined several indicators suggesting individuals are in a secure financial position. “If you have more than £1,000, you’re doing great. Second, if you have more than £5,594 in savings, that is the median savings currently in the UK, meaning that if you have more than that, you’re in the top 50%, and that’s skewed by the older generation.”

He continued: “So, if you have more than £1,000 under the age of 35, you’re doing better than 50%. If you have more than £3,500, you’re in the top 50%.”

Data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) shows that the typical UK household held approximately £5,500 in savings during 2024, suggesting many Britons may feel financially insecure despite maintaining reasonable savings levels. However, research from the Money and Pensions Service indicates that almost half of UK adults have less than £1,500 in savings, placing them at risk should unforeseen costs or emergencies arise.

The ongoing cost of living crisis has heightened concerns, with energy bills, food costs, and mortgage payments putting pressure on family finances. However, Nussbaum emphasises that modest, regular savings are more important than pursuing a massive balance immediately.

“Even putting aside a few hundred pounds a year can position you ahead of the average,” he says.

The video has sparked numerous responses online. “Who knew how well I was doing?” one user responded, whilst another acknowledged: “I feel like a success at life now, thank you for that.”

Conversely, many are becoming progressively worried: “Noted. I must do better. Less spending and more saving needed,” one person recognised, followed by another who admitted: “Oh okay, okay, so I have actually been doing worse than I first thought.”

Notably, younger savers frequently undervalue their position. ONS figures indicate that under-35s with merely £1,000 in savings are already outperforming half their age group.

By £3,500, they’ve surpassed 50% of the adult population, illustrating the benefit of early, consistent saving.

Financial advisers recommend reviewing your accounts routinely, setting up automatic transfers, and monitoring emergency funds to maximise your money. Whilst inflation may seem intimidating, establishing a buffer now – even a modest one – can make a substantial difference over time.

So, if your bank balance reaches that £3,500 milestone before your 55th birthday, take a moment to pause. According to Gabriel Nussbaum, you’re already faring better than you think – and that’s an achievement worth celebrating.

A rivalry reignites as Chelsea welcome Leeds United to Stamford Bridge in the Premier League as Liam Rosenior’s side looks to continue their fine form

Chelsea aim to extend their flawless Premier League record under Liam Rosenior as they host Leeds United at Stamford Bridge on Tuesday evening. Since Rosenior’s arrival, the Blues have secured four consecutive top-flight victories, marking a significant turnaround after failing to win any of their previous five league matches (three draws, two losses). Their resurgence has included impressive wins in a challenging stretch of London derbies—over Brentford, Crystal Palace, and West Ham United—culminating in Cole Palmer’s remarkable first-half hat-trick during Saturday’s 3–1 triumph at Wolverhampton Wanderers.

That win was the ideal response to their EFL Cup semi-final exit at the hands of Arsenal, with the home and away defeats to the Gunners representing Rosenior’s only setbacks in his first nine matches across all competitions. Chelsea currently sit fifth in the Premier League, just one point shy of the top four and four points ahead of sixth-placed Liverpool. A victory on Tuesday would not only bolster their Champions League ambitions but also see Rosenior become the first Chelsea manager since Maurizio Sarri in September 2018 to win his first three home league games in charge.

However, Chelsea will need to overcome their recent struggles in midweek fixtures, having failed to win any of their three such Premier League games this season (two draws, one loss), including a 3–1 defeat at Elland Road in December.

Leeds United, meanwhile, arrive in good spirits following a 3–1 home win over Nottingham Forest last Friday, where early goals from Jayden Bogle, Noah Okafor, and Dominic Calvert-Lewin put the result beyond doubt before Lorenzo Lucca’s late consolation. That victory helped Daniel Farke’s side bounce back after a heavy defeat to league leaders Arsenal, which remains just one of two losses in their last 12 league outings (four wins, six draws)—a notable improvement from their eight defeats in the opening 13 matches (three wins, two draws).

Now 16th in the table and six points clear of the relegation zone with 13 games remaining, Leeds will be eager to further distance themselves from danger with a positive result in London. However, their away form raises concerns, as they have lost seven of their 12 Premier League matches on the road, with only Burnley and Wolves collecting fewer points away from home this season. History is also against them at Stamford Bridge, where Leeds are winless in their last seven league visits, losing the last six, and have not celebrated a top-flight victory there since 1999.

Chelsea vs Leeds Team News

Chelsea are still expected to be without Jamie Gittens and Tosin Adarabioyo due to hamstring injuries, while Dario Essugo and Romeo Lavia continue their recoveries from thigh problems. Levi Colwill remains sidelined with a knee injury, and Filip Jorgensen’s fitness is uncertain, though Robert Sanchez is set to keep his place in goal. Andrey Santos is a doubt after picking up a knock against Wolves, but Rosenior has suggested Reece James could return after missing the last two games. Cole Palmer, fresh from his record-setting first-half hat-trick at Molineux, is likely to play just behind Joao Pedro.

For Leeds, Dominic Calvert-Lewin is expected to lead the attack, having scored both home and away against Chelsea this season—an achievement matched by teammates Jaka Bijol and Ao Tanaka. Facundo Buonanotte, whose Chelsea loan ended in January before joining Leeds, was left out of last weekend’s squad for tactical reasons and may miss out again. With Daniel James and Lukas Nmecha back, only Anton Stach is likely to be unavailable, giving manager Daniel Farke an almost fully fit squad.

Chelsea vs Leeds Prediction

• Chelsea to win and both teams to score – 15/8 ( Betfred )
• Joao Pedro to score anytime – 13/10 ( Betfred )

18+ | Gamble responsibly | gambleaware.org | Odds subject to change

Football Betting Offers

If you are on the lookout for the latest free bet offers, then look no further. Here, not only do we bring you numerous free bet offers, but all from the very best betting sites in the industry. Each bookie we recommend is fully licensed and regulated by the UK Gambling Commission, so you know you are always betting on a safe and trustworthy site.

Check out the Mirror Betting Hubs Free Bets offers here.

Full terms and conditions apply | gambleaware.org | Gamble responsibly | 18+ | UK only

READ MORE: Free Bets & Bookmaker Sign Up Offers

Gamble responsibly

Reach plc is committed to promoting safer gambling. All of our content and recommended bets are advised to those aged 18 or over. Odds are subject to change too.

We strongly encourage our readers to only ever bet what they can afford to lose. For more information, please call the National Gambling Helpline on 0808 8020 133 or visit gambleaware.org.