Connect with us

Crypto World

Polymarket sues Massachusetts over prediction market rules

Published

on

Polymarket sues Massachusetts over prediction market rules

Polymarket has taken legal action against Massachusetts officials, seeking to block the state from restricting its prediction markets.

Summary

  • Polymarket sued Massachusetts officials after a court ruling against rival Kalshi.
  • The platform says federal CFTC rules override state gambling laws.
  • The case could shape how prediction markets operate across the U.S.

The move comes as U.S. regulators and courts step up scrutiny of platforms that allow users to trade on real-world events, especially in sports.

On Feb. 10, Polymarket filed a lawsuit in federal court against Massachusetts Attorney General Andrea Campbell and state gaming regulators. The company said the threat of enforcement is “immediate and concrete,” following a recent ruling against rival platform Kalshi.

Advertisement

According to Polymarket, state intervention would disrupt its national operations, fragment its user base, and force it to choose between federal compliance and state restrictions. The company argues that its markets fall under federal oversight and should not be treated as local gambling products.

Federal authority vs. state gambling laws

At the center of the case is a dispute over who has the right to regulate prediction markets.

Polymarket says its event contracts are governed by the Commodity Futures Trading Commission. Under federal law, the CFTC oversees derivatives and futures markets, including certain types of prediction products. The company claims this authority overrides state-level gambling rules.

In its complaint, Polymarket pointed to comments made on Jan. 29 by CFTC Chairman Michael Selig, who said the agency would re-assess how it handles cases testing its jurisdiction. Shortly after, the CFTC filed an amicus brief in a related lawsuit involving Crypto.com.

Advertisement

Massachusetts courts have taken a different view. Last week, a state judge refused to pause a ban on Kalshi’s sports contracts, ruling that the platform must follow state gaming laws. The judge said Congress did not intend federal regulation to replace traditional state powers over gambling.

Kalshi has appealed the decision but was denied a stay. The ruling requires the company to block Massachusetts users from sports markets within 30 days.A federal judge in Nevada also recently denied Coinbase’s request for protection from a similar enforcement action, adding to the legal pressure on prediction platforms.

Robinhood, which partners with Kalshi, is now seeking its own injunction in Massachusetts to avoid state licensing requirements.

Advertisement

Growing pressure on prediction platforms

Polymarket’s lawsuit reflects wider tensions between fast-growing prediction markets and state regulators.

In a statement posted on social media, Polymarket chief legal officer Neal Kumar said the company is fighting “for the users.” He argued that state officials are racing to shut down innovation and ignoring federal law.

He added that Massachusetts and Nevada risk missing an opportunity to support new market models that blend finance, data, and public forecasting. State officials have so far declined to comment on the lawsuit.

The case arrives as prediction markets gain mainstream attention. Jump Trading recently made investments in Polymarket and Kalshi, two platforms that have garnered institutional support. According to recent funding rounds, Polymarket is valued at approximately $9 billion. 

Advertisement

Supporters claim that by enabling users to trade on economic, sports, and election data, these markets enhance price discovery and public insight. Many contracts, according to critics, resemble unlicensed gambling and may put users at risk.

If Polymarket succeeds, it could limit the ability of states to regulate prediction markets and strengthen the CFTC’s role nationwide. A loss, however, may encourage more states to impose licensing rules or bans.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

Ethereum Enters Capitulation Zone as MVRV Turns Negative: Bottom Near?

Published

on

Latest Bitcoin & Ethereum News, Crypto Prices & Indexes

Ethereum (CRYPTO: ETH) has slipped into a zone that market watchers associate with capitulation, as on-chain signals flash bearish, yet opt for caution on whether a definitive bottom is in place. The focal point is the MVRV Z-Score, a gauge that compares current market value to the realized value, effectively measuring how much investors are paying relative to the price at which Ether last moved. A reading around -0.42 indicates Ether is trading below its realized value, a sign historically linked to stress but not a sole predictor of a lasting bottom. While some analysts argue this signals a clear capitulation phase, others warn that the current slide may not reach the extremes observed in past bear markets.

The MVRV Z-Score was designed to flag phases of euphoria or capitulation by showing when market value diverges markedly from realized value. In practice, a notably negative score has preceded bottoming behavior in prior cycles, albeit without a guaranteed timetable. Joao Wedson, a crypto Quant analyst and founder of Alphractal, described the current reading as “showing that Ethereum is indeed going through a clear capitulation process.” Yet, he cautioned that today’s data do not match the intensity of the 2018 and 2022 bear-market lows. The record low for the metric sits at -0.76, observed in December 2018, underscoring the scale of the slide that would be needed for a historical parallel.

Ether MVRV Z-Score tanks below zero in capitulation. Source: Alphractal 

The near-term horizon, however, remains contested. Wedson noted that further downside is possible before any sustained recovery takes hold, citing continued market stress and the possibility of liquidity constraints during tax season. “The market is already under stress, but historically, there is still room for further downside before a definitive structural bottom is formed,” he said. Ether’s price action has been volatile, with a sharp decline followed by a tentative rebound, complicating the call on whether the capitulation phase is nearing its end.

The recent price action has been punishing: Ether has fallen about 30% over the past two weeks, sinking to a bear-market low near $1,825 on a Friday before a modest rebound to roughly $2,100 on the following Monday. The moves come amid broader macro fragility and shifting risk sentiment within crypto markets, prompting both caution and opportunism among analysts. Some traders and researchers see this as a rare “buy fear” window, while others warn that risk remains elevated until on-chain dynamics confirm a bottom.

Advertisement

HashKey Group senior researcher Tim Sun told Cointelegraph that historical performance has reinforced the view that Ethereum’s MVRV Z-Score can be a reliable indicator for identifying bottoming zones, particularly when combined with evolving on-chain activity and long-term ecosystem development. “Judging by on-chain activity, protocol evolution, and long-term ecosystem structure, Ethereum’s fundamentals have not seen any substantive deterioration. On the contrary, they continue to improve across several key dimensions,” he said. Still, Sun stressed that current trajectories could change if the primary drivers of decline persist, suggesting that a definitive bottom remains contingent on future liquidity and demand signals.

Meanwhile, other observers offered a more optimistic read. Michaël van de Poppe, founder of MN Fund, argued that the drawdown presents a rare opportunity to consider ETH as an investable bet, noting a substantial gap between the current price and the “fair price” implied by the MVRV ratio. “I think that this is a tremendous opportunity to be looking at ETH,” he tweeted, positing that negative deviations historically precede substantial recoveries when macro and on-chain conditions align. The narrative held that Ether’s network metrics and the broader ecosystem strength underpin a case for accumulation once the weak hands have been flushed out.

Other voices joined the chorus of potential catalysts for a rebound. Andri Fauzan Adziima, Bitrue’s research lead, suggested that persistent negative MVRV zones have historically preceded strong recoveries in subsequent cycles. He contended that ETH’s network fundamentals remained robust and that a long-term accumulation stance could emerge once price risk subsides. “Brutal capitulation now, but historically one of the best ‘buy fear’ windows for ETH,” Adziima said, underscoring the tension between near-term price action and longer-term structural factors.

ETH prices have tanked back to long-term cycle lows. Source: TradingView

Market participants acknowledged that the current pullback may be overshadowed by longer-term catalysts such as network upgrades and continued ecosystem maturation, even as price action remains sensitive to near-term liquidity and macro dynamics. The narrative that “buying fear” can yield outsized returns if followed by demand recovery continues to gain traction among several traders, though it remains balanced by caution regarding April liquidity and potential tax-related squeezes.

One of the best “buy fear” windows for Ether

Despite the caution, several observers argued that the current environment could present one of the more compelling entry points for ETH in recent memory. Van de Poppe’s commentary echoed a view shared by others that a sharp deviation below fair value can precede a robust rebound when demand returns and on-chain indicators resume strengthening. The notion is that ETH’s price could be primed for a longer-term recovery even if the immediate path remains choppy.

Advertisement

As the debate continues, sentiment remains nuanced. Some participants emphasize that negative MVRV conditions have historically aligned with durable recoveries once the weak hands capitulate, while others warn that liquidity constraints around the April tax season could delay any sustained recovery. The balance between on-chain fundamentals and macro stressors will likely shape Ether’s trajectory over the coming weeks and into the next quarter.

For investors watching the tape, the key takeaway is that volatility may persist even as underlying fundamentals show resilience. The combination of a negative MVRV reading and persistent price pressure suggests that any bottoming process will require a convergence of favorable liquidity and sustained demand, rather than a simple technical bounce.

Why it matters

The ongoing discussion around Ether’s valuation and bottoming prospects matters for multiple stakeholders. For traders, MVRV-based indicators provide a framework to interpret on-chain signals amid price volatility, while investors may view the current setup as an opportunity to accumulate at a discount relative to realized value. For developers and ecosystem participants, the narrative about Ethereum’s fundamentals—network activity, upgrade timelines, and long-term growth—matters for capital allocation, governance engagement, and potential product developments that could draw renewed user interest.

From a market-wide perspective, Ethereum’s fate remains a bellwether for risk appetite in crypto markets. A clear bottom in ETH could bolster sentiment across altcoins and contribute to a broader risk-on environment, while a protracted drawdown could reinforce caution and delay recovery for other assets. In either case, the episode underscores the importance of on-chain metrics as a corroborating lens for price action, beyond headlines and short-term moves.

Advertisement

What to watch next

  • Monitor liquidity conditions around the April tax season for potential downside or relief catalysts.
  • Track on-chain indicators related to MVRV Z-Score and general network activity to assess whether a structural bottom forms.
  • Watch for sustained price stabilization above recent lows and any acceleration in demand signals that could precede a rebound.
  • Observe broader macro factors and crypto market flows that could influence risk sentiment and capital allocation.

Sources & verification

  • On-chain MVRV Z-Score interpretation and commentary by Joao Wedson of Alphractal (tweet/status referenced in the article).
  • Cointelegraph reports on Ether’s 30% decline over a two-week period and the subsequent move to around $2,100.
  • HashKey Group insights from Tim Sun regarding MVRV Z-Score reliability and Ethereum fundamentals.
  • Industry commentary from Michaël van de Poppe and Bitrue’s Andri Fauzan Adziima on negative MVRV zones and potential buy opportunities.

Risk & affiliate notice: Crypto assets are volatile and capital is at risk. This article may contain affiliate links. Read full disclosure

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

U.S. BTC ETFs register back-to-back inflows for first time in a month

Published

on

U.S. BTC ETFs register back-to-back inflows for first time in a month

For the first time in nearly a month, U.S. bitcoin exchange-traded funds (ETFs) have recorded back-to-back net inflows, snapping a redemption streak that stretched back to mid-January.

According to SoSo value data, the consecutive inflows shift began on Friday with $471.1 million in fresh capital, followed by a $144.9 million on Monday. This comes as bitcoin bounced back from Thursday’s $60,000 low to around $70,000.

In mid-January, bitcoin peaked near $98,000 after a two week rally that started at $87,000. The subsequent sell-off to $60,000 saw investors yank millions of these spot ETFs.

Broadly speaking, investors still appear confidence about the cryptocurrency’s long-term prospects, as evident from the spot ETFs’ resilient asset under management (AUM).

Advertisement

According to Checkonchain, the cumulative AUM of the 11 funds has only decreased by about 7% since early October, sliding from 1.37 million BTC to 1.29 million BTC. Bitcoin, meanwhile, is down over 40% since hitting record highs above 126,000 in October.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Crypto News & Price Indexes

Published

on

Bitcoin, Ethereum, Crypto News & Price Indexes

Ethereum has hit a zone typically associated with mass selling, with an MVRV Z-Score returning a score of -0.42 — though analysts are split on whether the price of Ether is close to bottoming out. 

The MVRV Z-Score is a metric used to assess whether a crypto asset is overvalued or undervalued by comparing its market value to its realized value, which reflects the total value of Ether based on the price at which it was last transacted. 

The metric was created to identify periods of market euphoria or capitulation when market value was considerably higher or lower than realized value.

CryptoQuant analyst and Alphractal founder and CEO, Joao Wedson, said the score “shows that Ethereum is indeed going through a clear capitulation process.”

Advertisement

However, the analyst said the data “does not compare to the intensity” seen at the major bottoms of the 2018 and 2022 bear markets. 

The lowest value in history was -0.76, recorded in December 2018, said Wedson.

Ether MVRV Z-Score tanks below zero in capitulation. Source: Alphractal 

Further downsides for ETH prices possible

The analyst cautioned that further downsides could be possible before any meaningful recovery. 

“The market is already under stress, but historically, there is still room for further downside before a definitive structural bottom is formed,” he said. 

The price of Ether has fallen 30% over the past fortnight, reaching a bear market low of $1,825 on Friday before a minor recovery to $2,100 on Monday. 

Advertisement

Related: Tom Lee tips lack of leverage and gold ‘vortex’ for Ether’s 21% slump

HashKey Group senior researcher Tim Sun told Cointelegraph that historically, Ethereum’s MVRV Z-Score “has proven to be a highly reliable indicator for tracking subsequent market shifts, particularly in identifying bottoming zones across multiple cycles.”

“Judging by on-chain activity, protocol evolution, and long-term ecosystem structure, Ethereum’s fundamentals have not seen any substantive deterioration. On the contrary, they continue to improve across several key dimensions,” he said.

However, it is premature to conclude that Ether has finished its bottoming process as long as the primary drivers of the current decline persist, he added.  

Advertisement

“Given the potential liquidity constraints associated with the upcoming April tax season, the probability of further price downside remains a significant factor.”

One of the best “buy fear” windows for Ether

Other market commentators, such as MN Fund founder Michaël van de Poppe, were a little more optimistic, stating, “I think that this is a tremendous opportunity to be looking at ETH.”

“The core reason for this is that there’s a massive gap to the ‘fair price,’” he said, referring to the MVRV ratio.

Ether is currently as undervalued as it was during the April 2025 crash, the June 2022 bottom after the Terra/Luna collapse, the March 2020 Covid crash, and the December 2018 bear market bottom.

“In all of those cases, this provided a tremendous buying opportunity for this particular asset.”

Andri Fauzan Adziima, research lead at crypto trading platform Bitrue, told Cointelegraph that negative MVRV zones “have repeatedly preceded explosive recoveries in past cycles.”

Advertisement

“With ETH’s network metrics holding strong, it feels like a prime long-term accumulation setup once the weak hands are fully flushed,” he said. 

“Brutal capitulation now, but historically one of the best ‘buy fear’ windows for ETH.” 

ETH prices have tanked back to long-term cycle lows. Source: TradingView

Magazine: Bitcoin difficulty plunges, Buterin sells off Ethereum: Hodler’s Digest