Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Tech

Crypto-Funded Chinese Peptide Labs Are Booming

Published

on

Meta has been quietly stashing dormant face recognition code on more than 50 million phones, WIRED reported this week, tucked inside the companion app that pairs with its Ray-Ban and Oakley smart glasses. If activated, the feature—known internally as NameTag—would let wearers identify people in front of them by matching captured faces against a biometric gallery sitting on the user’s device. It’s the same kind of technology Meta said it walked away from in 2021, after paying out billions of dollars to settle biometric privacy lawsuits in Texas and Illinois.

Meanwhile, xAI is asking a federal judge to force four people suing the company over Grok-generated deepfake nudes to drop their pseudonyms and litigate under their real names—including one plaintiff who alleges the chatbot was used to fabricate sexual images of her as a child. The plaintiffs say they’d sooner drop the suit than submit to harassment and doxing from Musk’s online supporters. xAI’s lawyers, however, claim that since the deepfakes will remain under seal, there’s “nothing inherently stigmatizing” about naming the people in them.

Google rolled out a new Android feature this week aimed at the wave of AI-powered impersonation scams that help fraudsters spoof a familiar number and clone a person’s voice. Packaged with Google Dialer and shipping to phones running Android 12 or later, it pings the caller’s device for a silent cryptographic handshake. If the call is fake, Android will flag it and strip the contact photo from the screen, but only if both ends are on Google Dialer, which leaves iPhones out of the picture.

WIRED also reported this week that the Manhattan Institute—the same right-wing think tank that engineered the 1990s broken-windows policing and the Trump administration’s anti-DEI push—is now shopping model legislation to turn minor protest-related offenses into felonies under a novel theory it calls “civil terrorism.”

Advertisement

Researchers have detailed a clever new browser side-channel attack called FROST that fingerprints other tabs—and sometimes the apps on your device—by measuring how long it takes to read from a sandboxed file on your SSD. The attack runs entirely in JavaScript and feeds the timing traces through a neural network trained on the I/O signatures of common software. No evidence so far anyone is using it in the wild.

And that’s not all. Each week, we round up the security and privacy news we didn’t cover in-depth ourselves. Click the headlines to read the full stories, and stay safe out there.

The supplements known as peptides—chains of amino acids that promise to help those who smear, ingest, or inject them achieve everything from weight loss to skin rejuvenation—have become their own largely unregulated pharmaceutical subindustry. So it figures that their growth is being fueled by cryptocurrency, often sent directly to the Chinese labs that sell these mysterious panaceas.

Crypto-tracing firm Chainalysis this week published an analysis of crypto flows to peptide sellers, a gray market that the company now measures at more than $100 million a year and growing. Chainalysis specifically found that some of the same Chinese labs that were previously selling fentanyl precursors have now switched to manufacturing and selling peptides. The transition, Chainalysis believes, is designed to cash in on the wave of “looksmaxing” hype across social media that has pushed peptide sales—and to avoid the risk of a law enforcement crackdown on opioid manufacturers.

Advertisement

AI can do all kinds of things if you just ask it: Code an app, touch up your photos, or even hack President Barack Obama’s Instagram account. Since Meta announced in March that its account support will be increasingly automated with AI, including for functions like updating your password, hackers found that they could exploit the tool to reset the password and take over accounts of even high-profile users and celebrities. Among the victims, as reported by 404 Media, are Obama, the chief master sergeant of the US Space Force, and makeup chain Sephora. Meta says the issue is now fixed and affected accounts have been secured. But the wave of takeovers illustrates the risks of off-loading security functions to AI—particularly at companies like Meta, which has very publicly touted its all-in approach to adopting AI across the company.

When AI firm Anthropic rolled out its powerful Mythos tool to a select group of organizations for testing, it raised eyebrows by including the US National Security Agency on that initial access list. Mythos, after all, is reportedly capable of finding previously hidden, hackable vulnerabilities in software with alarming speed, raising fears that it could be used for automated mass surveillance and cyberattacks. But the NSA also has a defensive mission, and initial reporting suggested the agency might just be using Anthropic’s tool to find bugs in popular software used by Americans—such as Microsoft’s—with the goal of better securing it. Yet the Financial Times now reports that Anthropic is helping the NSA take its use of Mythos a step further, deploying Anthropic’s own engineers to the agency to help it learn to use the AI tool—including for offensive hacking. The FT couldn’t confirm that Mythos is being used in active hacking operations. But given the growing use of AI for state-sponsored hacking, it would be a surprise if the US is not joining the field of modern-day automated cyberintrusions.

US president Donald Trump has picked Bill Pulte to temporarily act as director of national intelligence. Pulte replaces Tulsi Gabbard, who recently stepped down from the role citing her husband’s health issues. Trump has said he is considering other people for the permanent job, but that confirmation process can take months.

As acting director, Pulte would be responsible for the entire US intelligence community, coordinating 18 different agencies including the Central Intelligence Agency and NSA.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Tech

Former Cop Arrested For Not Being Sufficiently Reverential Of Charlie Kirk’s Corpse Scores $835K Lawsuit Settlement

Published

on

from the whiny-ass-debate-me-bros dept

MAGA got itself a martyr when Charlie Kirk was killed. The “violent left,” etc. as they say. One of it’s own practiced what he preached and his life was ended prematurely by someone practicing what Kirk preached.

I mean, this is a direct quote of Charlie Kirk:

Kirk argued that the benefits of having guns in many American hands outweighed the costs. Gun deaths were inevitable in such a heavily armed society, he admitted, but the prevalence of firearms allowed citizens to “defend yourself against a tyrannical government”.

“I think it’s worth it,” he said. “I think it’s worth it to have a cost of, unfortunately, some gun deaths every single year so that we can have the second amendment to protect our other God-given rights. That is a prudent deal. It’s rational.”

The most charitable reading of this quote suggests that Kirk has embraced Thomas Jefferson — “”The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants” — but decided the “patriots” and/or “tyrants” must be, occasionally, innocent people, including elementary school students.

Advertisement

The least charitable reading is this: Charlie Kirk doesn’t care how many of your kids are killed so long as he (and his fellow debate me bro grifters) still have access to firearms. And as for the “second amendment protects the other God-given rights), get the fuck out of here. The last time any of these God, Guns, and Gadsden flag motherfuckers ever went after the government, they did it to fully embrace tyranny while attempting to destroy democracy.

So, when someone says something pointed to say about Charlie Kirk’s live-by-the-gun, die-by-the-gun philosophy, they’re in the right (as in “correct,” rather than being part of the “right”).

Late last year, someone not sufficiently supportive of Kirk’s martyrdom got arrested. Somewhat surprisingly, this person was a former law enforcement officer, which didn’t put him beyond the reach of a current law enforcement official who was a big fan of Charlie Kirk. Perry County (Tennessee) sheriff Nick Weems took it upon himself to take offense on behalf of everyone in his jurisdiction and arrested former cop Larry Bushart for simply quoting Donald Trump in response to Charlie Kirk’s shooting:

One of his posts was a photo of President Donald Trump, along with the quote “We have to get over it,” drawing from his response to a school shooting in Perry, Iowa, in 2024. 

Weems pretended that this post caused mass hysteria in Perry County, Tennessee. First, he claimed he was justified in arresting Larry Bushart because Bushart refused to take the post down. “What kind of person just says he don’t care?” asked the sheriff, who apparently thinks the First Amendment only applies to people who care what law enforcement officers say when they’re in the process of violating people’s rights.

Advertisement

Then he lied to everyone — something exposed by none other than Lexington PD officers. He later admitted investigators knew Bushart wasn’t referring to Perry County or its schools in his Facebook post, which meant the post couldn’t possibly hope to satisfy even the vague and expansive contours of a local law that’s supposed to curb school shootings by punishing online threats.

Sheriff Weems claimed “mass hysteria” was the result of Bushart’s post. A public records request to the Perry County School District for documents by FIRE (Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, which represented Bushart in this case) pertaining to this post was met with a “no related records” response, which strongly suggests no parent, student, teacher, or administrator thought Bushart’s post was some sort of threat against local schools or students.

The end result of Weems’ asinine attempt to punish someone for indirectly maligning Kirk’s cooling corpse? A sizable settlement that taxpayers might want to remember the next time Weems is up for election:

A Tennessee man who was jailed for 37 days over a Facebook post he shared after the killing of Charlie Kirk has agreed to a $835,000 settlement with the sheriff who detained him, his lawyers said on Wednesday.

[…]

Advertisement

In the posts, he shared memes that accused Mr. Kirk’s organization, Turning Point USA, of perpetrating hate and another that included past comments from President Trump about moving past a school shooting. The sheriff’s office in Perry County, Tenn., claimed that with those posts, he had threatened violence.

His bail was set at $2 million, and he remained in jail until the charge against him was dropped.

Check out that last sentence. Voters might also want to keep this in mind the next time local judges are up for election (or, if appointed, the people who appoint these judges are up for election).

Look, even if I didn’t think Charlie Kirk was a terrible person with reprehensible ideas/ideals, I’d still speak up for everyone’s right to treat his death with whatever level of respect they thought it deserved. “Too soon” is in the eye of the beholder, which definitely isn’t the objective approach needed to address cases involving personal expression.

Advertisement

Even if I thought Larry Bushart was extremely careless in his wording or was perhaps trying to tease out an inference that could conceivably be seen as “threatening,” there’s no excuse for what happened here.

“No one should be hauled off to jail in the dark of night over a harmless meme just because the authorities disagree with its message,” Adam Steinbaugh, a senior attorney with the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression, a free speech legal advocacy group that represents Mr. Bushart, said in a statement. “We’re pleased that Larry has been compensated for this injustice, but local law enforcement never should have forced him to endure this ordeal in the first place.”

No law enforcement officer worth their paycheck would have engaged in this arrest. (And, indeed, it looks as though the first officers on the scene from the Lexington PD saw this as an unconstitutional attack on someone’s protected rights.) And no judge should have signed off on a $2 million bail request over a post only one person — that being Sheriff Weems — seemed to feel was illegal.

Bushart wins. Tennessee residents also win, but they’re stuck with the bill. Sheriff Weems loses, but unless he’s ousted from office, he’ll learn nothing from this experience, since this won’t be coming out of his own pocket. The First Amendment has been vindicated, but Sheriff Weems (and the people who support him) made it clear it will always be under attack so long as MAGA acolytes remain in positions of power.

Filed Under: 1st amendment, bogus arrest, censorship, charlie kirk, donald trump, free speech, gun violence, larry bushart, perry county, sheriff nick weems, tennessee

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

NYT Connections hints and answers for Sunday, June 7 (game #1092)

Published

on

Looking for a different day?

A new NYT Connections puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Saturday’s puzzle instead then click here: NYT Connections hints and answers for Saturday, June 6 (game #1091).

Good morning! Let’s play Connections, the NYT’s clever word game that challenges you to group answers in various categories. It can be tough, so read on if you need Connections hints.

What should you do once you’ve finished? Why, play some more word games of course. I’ve also got daily Strands hints and answers and Quordle hints and answers articles if you need help for those too, while Marc’s Wordle today page covers the original viral word game.

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Quordle hints and answers for Sunday, June 7 (game #1595)

Published

on

Looking for a different day?

A new Quordle puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Saturday’s puzzle instead then click here: Quordle hints and answers for Saturday, June 6 (game #1594).

Quordle was one of the original Wordle alternatives and is still going strong now more than 1,400 games later. It offers a genuine challenge, though, so read on if you need some Quordle hints today – or scroll down further for the answers.

Enjoy playing word games? You can also check out my NYT Connections today and NYT Strands today pages for hints and answers for those puzzles, while Marc’s Wordle today column covers the original viral word game.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

NYT Strands hints and answers for Sunday, June 7 (game #826)

Published

on

Looking for a different day?

A new NYT Strands puzzle appears at midnight each day for your time zone – which means that some people are always playing ‘today’s game’ while others are playing ‘yesterday’s’. If you’re looking for Saturday’s puzzle instead then click here: NYT Strands hints and answers for Saturday, June 6 (game #825).

Strands is the NYT’s latest word game after the likes of Wordle, Spelling Bee and Connections – and it’s great fun. It can be difficult, though, so read on for my Strands hints.

Want more word-based fun? Then check out my NYT Connections today and Quordle today pages for hints and answers for those games, and Marc’s Wordle today page for the original viral word game.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Anthropic is blacklisted by the Pentagon and being used by the NSA at the same time

Published

on


The Financial Times reports that Anthropic has installed half a dozen engineers inside the NSA as forward-deployed staff. Their job is said to involve guiding the agency’s use of Claude Mythos and customizing the model for specific applications.
Read Entire Article
Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Argentina vs Honduras free streams: How to watch World Cup warm-up

Published

on

Watch Argentina vs Honduras live streams to see how the defending champions shape up before the 2026 World Cup. Can they become only the third team in history to retain the title? Early signs suggest that Lionel Messi’s men are indeed capable of doing that.

After their March friendly against Spain was cancelled, Argentina went on to decimate Mauritania and Zambia and have now won five successive friendlies. They will look to extend that run against Honduras.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

This $79.99 Google TV Streamer 4K is an easy upgrade for old sets

Published

on

There comes a point with an ageing television where the picture is still perfectly watchable, but the smart platform it shipped with has become too slow, too limited, or simply too frustrating to use every day.

Plugging in a dedicated streamer is the most cost-effective way to solve that problem, and the Google TV Streamer 4K is currently down from $99.99 to $79.99, saving you $20 in a 20% discount.

Google TV streamer 4k on a stone backgroundGoogle TV streamer 4k on a stone background

The Google TV 4K streamer is 20% off at the moment, making it an easy upgrade for non‑smart sets or TVs that are on their last legs

For anyone whose current TV setup is either too slow or simply absent, this Google TV deal can fix that without spending much at all.

Advertisement

View Deal

Everything you watch across your streaming services lives on a single home screen with the Google TV Streamer 4K, with tailored recommendations pulling from your viewing habits rather than pushing whatever a platform wants you to watch next.

Advertisement

The picture itself is delivered in 4K HDR with Dolby Vision support, and Dolby Atmos compatibility means that if your speaker setup can handle it, the audio keeps pace with what the display is doing rather than falling behind.

Under the hood, the processor is 22% faster than Chromecast with Google TV (its previous generation) and comes with twice the memory, which in practice means menus respond immediately and switching between apps does not involve the kind of lag that makes a streamer feel like more trouble than it is worth.

Advertisement

The Whatsapp LogoThe Whatsapp Logo

Get Updates Straight to Your WhatsApp

Advertisement

Join Now

32GB of onboard storage gives you enough room to install a broad range of apps without having to make difficult choices about what to keep, and the Google TV Streamer 4K also pulls in over 800 free live channels through services like Pluto TV and Tubi at no extra cost.

Advertisement

The redesigned remote includes a customisable shortcut button, voice control for search and smart home commands, and a find-my-remote function that makes it ring when it inevitably disappears between the sofa cushions.

If your living space runs on Google Nest products, the home panel on the Google TV Streamer 4K lets you check camera feeds, adjust lighting, and manage connected devices directly from your television without switching inputs or picking up your phone.

The $20 saving brings a genuinely capable streaming box down to $79.99, and for anyone whose current setup is either too slow or simply absent, this is a tidy way to fix that without spending much at all.

Advertisement

Advertisement

SQUIRREL_PLAYLIST_10148964

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Audi’s 1,001 PS Nuvolari is its fastest car ever, and it’s not electric

Published

on

TL;DR

Audi revealed the Nuvolari, a 1,001 PS hybrid supercar with a 10,000-rpm V8 and three electric motors. Only 499 will be built. Deliveries start in 2027.

Audi has revealed the Nuvolari, the fastest and most powerful production vehicle in its history. The hybrid supercar produces 1,001 PS (736 kW) from a 4.0-litre V8 biturbo paired with three axial flux electric motors. Only 499 will be built, starting at €600,000.

The V8 alone delivers 800 PS and revs to 10,000 rpm, territory previously reserved for motorsport. Each of the three electric motors adds 110 kW. Combined, the powertrain launches the car from 0 to 100 km/h in 2.6 seconds and 0 to 200 km/h in 6.8 seconds, with a top speed above 350 km/h.

The Nuvolari shares its platform with the Lamborghini Temerario, which produces 920 PS. But Audi pushed the output higher and added its own tech, including a system called quattro predictive ride. It processes steering angle, acceleration, yaw rate, and grip level in real time, coordinating the electric motors, brakes, and aerodynamic surfaces as a unified network.

Advertisement

The body is almost entirely carbon fibre reinforced polymer, built on an Audi Space Frame. Active aerodynamic surfaces, inspired by Formula 1, adjust position to generate downforce on demand. A vertical frame made of 64 individually angled tiles channels air through a concealed S-duct.

Advertisement

It is a plug-in hybrid, not a pure EV, at a time when Europe’s cumulative EV investment has passed €200 billion. Weighted fuel consumption sits at 11.3 l/100 km combined with 7.8 kWh/100 km of electric use. CO2 emissions land at 270 g/km. Those are preliminary figures, but they make clear this car is built for performance, not efficiency.

The timing is notable. Audi had signalled a push toward full electrification, but the Nuvolari is a combustion-led halo car arriving as the brand enters Formula 1 in 2026 and works to rebuild its performance credentials. It also comes as foreign automakers struggle to compete in China, where domestic brands now control 70% of the market. CEO Gernot Döllner said the car shows how Audi is “taking ‘Vorsprung durch Technik’ into a new era.

The name honours Tazio Nuvolari, one of the most celebrated racing drivers to represent the four rings. Ferdinand Porsche once called him “the greatest driver of the past, the present and the future.” Order books open in late 2026, with deliveries beginning in the first half of 2027.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Ladybird Browser Stops Accepting Public Pull Requests

Published

on

The Ladybird browser isn’t opposed to AI coding tools, but it’s just brought a new change to their code-contributing policies.

February 23: “Ladybird adopts Rust, with help from AI.”
I used Claude Code and Codex for the translation. This was human-directed, not autonomous code generation. I decided what to port, in what order, and what the Rust code should look like. It was hundreds of small prompts, steering the agents where things needed to go… The requirement from the start was byte-for-byte identical output from both pipelines. The result was about 25,000 lines of Rust, and the entire port took about two weeks. The same work would have taken me multiple months to do by hand.
June 5 (Friday):

We will no longer accept public pull requests… A pull request no longer tells us as much as it used to about the person submitting it. A substantial patch used to imply substantial effort, and that effort was a reasonable proxy for good faith. That assumption no longer holds….

We have already seen patient, well-resourced campaigns in open source to earn maintainer trust and abuse it. What has changed is how much faster and cheaper it has become to produce work that looks like a serious contribution… Whether code was typed by hand is beside the point. What matters is who is responsible for it once it enters the browser. Ladybird is becoming a browser for real users. The people introducing changes to it must be the people who decide those changes belong in the project, and who will answer for the consequences.

As part of this change, we will close all currently open public pull requests. We are grateful for the work people put into them, but keeping the existing queue open would keep that contribution path open in practice. There is no perfect time to make this change, so we are making it now. Going forward, pull requests will only be available to project maintainers. There will not be a separate process for submitting patches by other means. We do not want to create a shadow contribution system through issues, comments, email, or forks…

Advertisement

Outside involvement still matters: clear bug reports, reductions, website testing, standards discussion, design discussion, security reports, and technical feedback all help move the project forward. This is the right change for Ladybird now. We are preparing to ship a browser to real users, and our development process has to match that responsibility.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Netflix says there is no future for theatrical releases in its streaming universe

Published

on

Netflix may be willing to send Greta Gerwig’s upcoming Narnia movie into theaters, but if anyone in Hollywood was hoping that decision signaled a broader change of heart, the company just slammed that door shut.

In a candid interview with The New York Times, Netflix film chairman Dan Lin made it clear that the streamer’s relationship with movie theaters remains largely unchanged. While Gerwig’s Narnia is expected to receive a full theatrical release before arriving on Netflix, Lin described the project as an exception rather than the start of a new strategy. More notably, he suggested Netflix has little interest in accommodating filmmakers who continue to prioritize traditional theatrical runs.

“There is a group of filmmakers who still want theatrical,” Lin said. “Those are filmmakers that we’ve accepted we just won’t work with.” It’s a remarkably direct statement, but it also reflects the confidence of a company that no longer feels the need to play by Hollywood’s old rules.

Netflix no longer needs theaters to prove itself

A few years ago, Netflix spent considerable energy convincing filmmakers that it could be both a streaming giant and a legitimate movie studio. Under former film chief Scott Stuber, the company aggressively pursued acclaimed directors, handed out sizable budgets, and occasionally fought for theatrical releases to attract awards attention.

Advertisement

The environment today looks very different. Netflix won the streaming wars, at least by most conventional measures. It has hundreds of millions of subscribers, dominates the viewing charts, and operates from a position of strength while traditional studios continue to search for sustainable business models. As Lin sees it, the company no longer needs movie theaters to validate its films or its reputation.

Instead, the focus has shifted toward making movies specifically for Netflix audiences. Lin has spent the past two years pushing a strategy centered on producing fewer films, spending more carefully, and concentrating on projects that can attract viewers directly to the platform.

That approach has already generated successes such as Apex, which crossed 100 million views during its first month on the service, and People We Meet on Vacation, a romantic comedy that drew millions of viewers while turning relatively unknown actors into recognizable Netflix stars.

The great theatre divide isn’t going away

The tension between streaming and theatrical exhibition has never really disappeared. Many filmmakers still argue that movies are designed to be experienced on giant screens with packed audiences. For directors, theatrical runs can also create cultural momentum, awards consideration, and a level of prestige that streaming premieres often struggle to replicate.

Netflix, however, continues to view the equation differently. Lin’s comments suggest the company is comfortable walking away from creators whose demands don’t align with its business model. That’s a notable shift from earlier years, when Netflix often seemed eager to win over skeptical Hollywood talent at almost any cost.

Advertisement

The Narnia release demonstrates that exceptions can still occur when a project is large enough or a filmmaker has sufficient leverage. But Netflix appears determined to keep those exceptions rare. The company sees its future inside its app, not at the multiplex.

For movie lovers, that may be disappointing. There’s something undeniably magical about watching a major fantasy epic unfold on a giant screen surrounded by strangers. Yet Netflix’s position is increasingly difficult to argue against from a business perspective. If a movie can reach tens of millions of viewers worldwide without relying on ticket sales, the streamer sees little reason to share the spotlight with theaters.

So while Narnia may get its moment under the cinema marquee, don’t mistake it for a revival of Netflix’s theatrical ambitions. According to the executive overseeing the company’s movie division, that chapter was never meant to be reopened.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025