FED-UP locals living in a new build “ghost town” have slammed developers that left them without a high street.

There is no post office, no newsagent, no greengrocers and no convenience store in Cambourne, a few miles from Cambridge.

10

10

Advertisement

10

10

And although bus stop signs were erected in West Cambourne, no buses ever stop there.

The second pub locals were promised never materialised either.

Instead, most of the High Street is just an open space covered in grass, with a café, building society and a Turkish barbers at one end and few houses clustered at the other.

Now instead of the shops planned when work began in the 1990s, there are proposals to build another 30 townhouses and 87 flats there.

“It’s sh*t,” said one angry man out walking with his young daughter at the weekend. “Absolute sh*t.

“They just want to make money by building more houses and forget about amenities for the people who live here.”

Danny Dove, 78, sat enjoying a beer outside the Monkfield Arms, the town’s only pub, agreed.

“Apart from this place there’s not much to do here,” he said. “It’s a bit of a ghost town really.”

Seyi Daramola, 44, who had spent the afternoon shopping in Morrisons supermarket with his 11-year-old daughter Dara, reckoned the town lacks soul.

“We do need some more shops,” said Seyi, who recently moved to Cambourne from north London. “It would add a bit of character to the town.”

Mum-of-three Gaynor Cooke, 61, who moved to the town in 2003, added: “There have been a lot of broken promises.

“We were supposed to have a market square, but nothing happened with that.

“There was even talk of a golf course, but we didn’t get that either.

“Instead we just ended up with a load of estate agents!

“It would be nice to have some small, unique shops, if only a greengrocers. A bit of variety would be lovely.”

Fiona Smith, 52, out with her 13-year-old daughter Caitlin, said: “I’d like to see another pub and a second supermarket rather than more houses.

“A couple more restaurants wouldn’t go amiss, perhaps even a cinema. And we really do need a post office.”

Doctors Lahiry Deiyagala and Kokila Karunarthne, both 38, both love living in Cambourne.

But they face a 20-minute drive to Huntingdon, nine miles away, if they want to stock up with their favourite Asian foods.

“We need another supermarket – or at least a bigger one – with a wider choice of items,” said Lahiry. “That would save us a journey!”

Christine Walker, 77, out walking her dog Oscar, said: “It is doggie heaven here because we are surrounded by lovely countryside.

“And the tea shop is lovely. But there is not a lot for youngsters and we could do with another pub.”

Zac Edwards, 31, said: “It’s a very friendly town and the people are lovely. But there’s nothing here.

“The local GP practice is over-subscribed already and it’s virtually impossible to get an appointment at the two practice dentists.

“They put up bus stops in West Cambourne where I live – unfortunately, though, no buses ever stop at them.”

10

Advertisement

10

10

10

Newcrest Cambourne Ltd who have applied for planning permission for the new homes argue they are necessary to make the scheme, which contains “several” new retail units, “commercially viable”.

They claim: “This mix of uses will add to the vibrancy of the town centre bringing people living in the town centre.”

But residents have bombarded South Cambridgeshire District Council with objections.

One said: “The area really ought to be filled with just shops, community spaces and, if any residential at all, it should all be social and affordable housing only.”

Another claimed it was “outrageous” that homes were “being squeezed in to the detriment of the purpose of the High Street” and added: “The proposed application is not appropriate for the community.”

And a third added: “Cambourne has far too much residential development as it is. What we are sorely lacking is retail, services and amenities.

“We need recreational places i.e. a swimming pool (top priority), and other possibilities include cinema, bowling and restaurants. A post office is a necessity.

“We also need a wider variety of shops including alternative supermarkets (e.g. Lidl or Aldi), independent stores/organic grocers, charity shops and TK Maxx.”

But despite the lack of shops and leisure facilities, Cambourne does have one claim to fame – the first, and only, Post Box bearing the cipher of King Charles III.

Unveiled this summer by Julie Spence, the Lord-Lieutenant of Cambridgeshire, it draws visitors from around the world.

During a couple of hours on Saturday afternoon, three cyclists from London photographed themselves with it, before a couple of Dutch tourists arrived and then an excited group of university students from Cambridge.

South Cambridgeshire District Council’s Lead Cabinet Member for Communities, Cllr Henry Batchelor, said: “Cambourne is a successful and beautiful place to live and work – and the amount of open space and woodland is second to none for a new town.

“There’s a strong community engaged in all sorts of innovative projects and activities for all ages – alongside a supermarket, shops and convenience stores, hotels, schools and superb sports facilities.

“Meanwhile, we are in the process of determining a planning application which proposes further retail space on the High Street alongside new homes.

“Our aim, working with our partners, such as Cambourne’s excellent Town Council and residents, is to continue creating a vibrant town with an exemplar transport network that connects communities, allowing people the choice to leave their cars at home.”

The Sun has approached Newcrest Cambourne Ltd for comment.

10

Advertisement

10

A HOLIDAY park expert has revealed some of his top tips – and the key feature he always checks before booking.

Robbie Lane has visited dozens of holiday parks across the UK, with an ambition to one day visit them all.

5

5

Advertisement

Robbie, who runs Holiday Park Guru has been to all kinds of resorts, from the popular Center Parcs and Butlin’s to lesser-known independent sites.

But there is one feature he always makes sure they have before he books a trip there.

The former BBC journalist told Sun Online Travel: “I look for a holiday park that is walking distance to a beach, ideally with a sea view.

He added it makes it “much less hassle” especially when travelling as a family if you can avoid having to pack everything into a car.

He continued: “And it makes it much easier to fit in a quick seaside stroll after tea.”

He also said he tries to make sure the beaches that are at the holiday parks are both clean and safe for children, and gave some trips on where to find his favourites.

Robbie added: “If you want to try surfing and bodyboarding, then Devon and Cornwall are particularly good, as are parts of Wales.

“Haven, Parkdean Resorts and Away Resorts all have holiday parks next to outstanding beaches in the West Country.

“The east coast of England and Scotland has lots of very wide open beaches with big open skies and space for walking the dog.”

One holiday park Robbie previously raved about was Ladram Bay in Devon – an award-winning site with its own private beach.

The sand-washed pebble beach has a stretch of rockpools and watersports like kayaks, paddleboards and motorboats can be rented from the holiday park.

Holidaymakers who don’t fancy a bracing dip will be pleased to know there’s also a heated indoor swimming pool on-site, complete with slides.

There’s also a small pool with a children’s play area as well as an outdoor splash area with water features, spray guns and pirate ships.

Likewise, Darwin Escapes Woodside Coastal Retreat on the Isle of Wight, is one of the Holiday Park Guru’s favourite UK sites.

He previously told Sun Online Travel: “The holiday park is practically on the beach looking towards Portsmouth, it’s brilliant.”

If a holiday park isn’t next to a beach, Robbie recommends looking for an indoor swimming pool.

5

5

The Holiday Park Guru previously recommended Searles in Norfolk and Hendra Holiday Park in Cornwall as two sites with indoor pools.

Searles holiday park in Norfolk is located next to the Victorian seaside town of Hunstanton and has been welcoming families for 83 years.

There are plenty of indoor facilities, including a heated indoor pool with a jacuzzi and sauna.

For younger guests, there’s also an indoor splash pool with dual slides and interactive water features.

Meanwhile, Hendra Holiday Park near Newquay has one of the largest indoor pools in the South West.

The Oasis Fun Pools feature an indoor pool with a river-rapid, a water cannon, tipping buckets, water fountains and three water flume rides.

Earlier this year, Robbie revealed England’s top three underrated holiday parks – with private beaches, indoor water parks and jet skis for kids.

And here are the other lesser-known holiday parks named among the best in the UK.

5

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Roula Khalaf, Editor of the FT, selects her favourite stories in this weekly newsletter.

The EU will delay the start of its new electronic border system, said two people briefed on the discussions, after Germany, France and the Netherlands warned that the bloc’s computer systems were not ready.

The three countries had asked the European Commission to rethink plans to launch the “Entry/Exit System” in a month’s time because of fears that travel would be disrupted and the computer systems overwhelmed.

Germany, France and the Netherlands account for 40 per cent of passenger traffic affected by the new system, and the commission could not proceed with its plans — which had already been delayed several times — without their consent.

At a meeting of EU home affairs ministers on Thursday, home affairs commissioner Ylva Johansson told ministers that the start date of November 10 was not feasible, and that the commission would consider a later date, according to two officials familiar with the situation.

The commission also proposed to introduce the system in phases, rather than all at once, said four officials briefed on the talks.

“The commission asked the [council of ministers] to agree to a phased approach. France, Germany and the Netherlands agreed, and the [Hungarian] EU presidency indicated that would be a good way forward. On the basis of that, the commission can now continue to work internally on a solution,” one EU diplomat said.

Airports and airlines have also warned of queues at immigration, as the new system will require non-EU citizens to register their personal details, including fingerprints and facial images, when they first visit the bloc.

The officials said the commission would have to propose a legal change to make the phased-in approach possible, as the current legislation foresees introducing the new biometric border checks everywhere at once.

A targeted change to the legislation would require the EU Council and the European parliament to agree, which could take months. Another option could be for the commission to issue a so-called implementing act to facilitate a gradual start, the officials said.

The legal steps and potential new start date will be discussed next week at a meeting of the managing board of EU-Lisa, the EU agency charged with implementing the new system, the officials said.

Two officials said the delay to the November date meant it was possible that the new system could begin next year.

Germany’s interior ministry last month said the central computer system of EU-Lisa “still lacks the necessary stability and functionality” and therefore the required tests could not be carried out.

The European Commission did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

When selecting platforms, advisers have to reconcile two opposing interests – the needs of the client and the needs of the firm.

Platforms are products for clients, and they are the ones who almost always pay for them. But the reality is that platforms primarily provide services to advisers to help them look after their clients’ portfolios.

The two purposes have different selection criteria. There is clear evidence advisers are shifting their view of platforms and how they choose them, and that they are primarily focusing on their own needs, according to our latest UK Adviser Platforms: Platform Selection report.

This horses-for-courses approach became less relevant as platforms became more similar in their pricing and capabilities

But the good news is that maybe this is in the clients’ best interests after all.

The ‘platform as product’ approach was dominant for many years. Platforms have come in many shapes and sizes, each with their own particular features and even peculiarities.

Charging structures varied – some were great for smaller clients, while others were better for large portfolios or clients with workplace pensions.

Functionality was also different across the market. Some platforms were fine if you stuck to simple transactions, while others could handle more complicated and specialised business.

So, a firm with a range of client profiles typically used a variety of different platforms and selected them on a client-by-client basis.

Platforms may be basically quite similar but they all have their own idiosyncrasies that advisers and support staff need to master

But this horses-for-courses approach became less relevant as platforms became more similar in their pricing and capabilities. Nowadays, maximum platform charges are mostly clustered around the 0.3%-0.35% and they are expected to include almost every functionality.

Differences remain, but they have become less important, except perhaps in a few special situations.

As charges and features have converged and some platforms have become sufficiently cheap and capable for the needs of most clients, it was enough to use just one or perhaps two or three platforms.

Of course, some advisers had long ago decided to focus on a very few platforms because they had low-cost special deals with providers that were competitive for virtually all their clients – or, in a few cases, they simply had a homogeneous clientele.

Unsurprisingly, some players have called for more transparency about special deals and platform charges that mostly remain confidential

Selection on a client-by-client basis may have optimised individual client suitability (at least theoretically) but it bred inefficiencies for the advice firms that used this approach.

Platforms may be basically quite similar but they all have their own idiosyncrasies that advisers and support staff have needed to master.

Using multiple platforms means less expertise within firms in using individual platforms, together with more admin, more staff training and greater danger of mistakes. All these risks and costs are ultimately passed on to clients.

Consumer Duty’s ever-expanding requirements for advice firms is also looming over advisers’ heads. Less efficiency and higher costs limit the scope to charge clients less.

The drive for efficiency has led many advisers to think differently and more strategically about the way they select platforms. The average number of platforms advisers use has declined as they increasingly regard them as the administrative ‘plumbing’ for clients’ investments. So, what’s changed and what has stayed the same?

Advisers’ growing focus on using fewer platforms has yet to reduce platforms numbers in the market

Pricing remains important. Concentrating business onto one or two platforms allows newer platforms with whizzier tech to provide very competitive standard pricing in the mid to low teens or even less. Older platforms can often offer special deals that can match these rates or better them.

Unsurprisingly, some players have called for more transparency about special deals and platform charges that mostly remain confidential.

But clients of firms that cling to the horses-for-courses approach and pay the standard charges are probably missing out.

The adoption of adviser-controlled platforms is another sign of this shift. Larger firms are more likely to go down this route, pioneering greater control of their advice process as well as lower charges, some of which they might pass onto clients.

Another symptom is the acceleration in the volume of transfers between platforms. Over 50% of advisers have transferred assets in the last 12 months – many citing cost and service as primary drivers. Advice firm consolidation is also a powerful push factor.

Advisers’ growing focus on using fewer platforms has yet to reduce platforms numbers in the market. But with more platform switching, winners and losers are bound to emerge – with the inevitable platform consolidation to follow.

Lottie Bussell-Ahern is associate analyst at Platforum

Unlock the US Election Countdown newsletter for free

The stories that matter on money and politics in the race for the White House

The Golden State is losing its lustre.

Since 2019, over 200 companies have left California for greener pastures — the most of any American state, by far — according to announcements tracked by fDi Markets, an FT service.

Some big names have gone. Chevron, Hewlett-Packard, Palantir, and Charles Schwab have all made the move elsewhere.

At the same time, few companies are relocating to California. What explains the exodus, and lack of arrivals?

Elon Musk, in part, blames the “woke mind virus” for shifting his ventures — SpaceX and Tesla — out of the liberal state. The less hyperbolic and more realistic reason cited by businesses is the rising burdens upon enterprise.

Start with the basics. California’s tax rates aren’t exactly competitive. And, according to data from George Mason University’s Mercatus Center, it is the most regulated state in the country. As of 2023, the California Code of Regulations contains over 400k restrictions and 23mn words, the bulk of which cover “industry, commerce and development”.

So it’s no surprise that two of the biggest beneficiaries from this shift are Texas and Florida — which offer looser regulations and more competitive tax rates.

But the biggest motive for companies relocating within the US, according to an fDi markets survey, is actually talent. It’s a narrative that would seem to jar with the Silicon Valley’s status as a hub for high-skilled techies.

Well. California also has a big problem with outmigration. In the 2010s, it experienced a net loss of 1.3mn residents. That has had a knock-on impact on state coffers (its budget deficit is estimated at around a whopping $45bn).

It’s not just low-income households moving out. One would assume that tech types would be tied to California’s cluster of coders, venture capitalists, and artisanal coffee shops. But employment in IT, business services and finance has been falling in the aftermath of the pandemic. California’s share of tech jobs across America has also dropped, although this may in part reflect its relative maturity as other areas experience new growth.

People are leaving, in part, because companies are. But California is also becoming a harder place to make a living. Housing affordability is a particular problem. For measure, in San Francisco’s Bay Area, median home prices recently hit $2mn.

Many again point the finger at regulation. Density restrictions, high land costs, environmental laws and NIMBYism are all blamed for making permitting processes frustratingly long. That peeves off commercial developers, and pushes-up residential prices, which scare workers away. Work-from-home culture has also meant many tech firms have downsized offices, and employees seek bigger, but affordable homes.

Above all. Despite its, many, draws — sun-soaked beaches, Silicon Valley, Disney World — if living gets tough, people up sticks.

And things are tough: California’s Misery Index — the sum of the annual inflation and unemployment rate — has been at a premium to the US-wide measure since the start of the pandemic.

Despite all this, the Golden State remains America’s largest economy (and in nominal terms, the world’s fifth-largest economy). Silicon Valley remains the world’s tech hub. The trends, however, do not look great. Other states are getting shinier in their own right. California can no longer afford to rest on its laurels.

MARTIN Lewis has warned against paying a regular household bill monthly – and it could even be cheaper covering the cost using a credit card.

The consumer champion said to steer clear of paying for car insurance in regular instalments over the year and instead pay annually if you can.

1

In a recent poll on X, Lewis asked his followers how they pay for motor cover, with over 32% revealing they do it via monthly direct debit.

In response to the figures, Martin said he was taken aback at how many were not paying up front.

This is because when you pay monthly, the insurer classes it as you taking out a loan and charges you interest, meaning you pay more.

When you pay up front there’s no interest on top.

Martin said: “Monthly direct debit is a LOAN – they pay the year for you and loan you the money often at 20% – 40% APR way more than a typical credit card.

“I’m shocked by how many pay by monthly DD. Avoid if at all possible.”

Martin went on to say while he understood paying for car insurance monthly can help drivers budget, the APR’s charged by many big insurers mean a cheaper option can be paying annually with a credit card, ideally charging 0%.

And even some credit cards without interest-free periods charge lower rates than insurers.

APR refers to the total cost of your borrowing for the year.

Martin added: “If you have to, most would be far better to put it on a 0% card and repay it over the 12 months.

“Or even a standard high st card with APR 20%, undercuts many big insurers who charge up to 40% APR.”

The latest MSE newsletter revealed how Direct Line charges 23% APR, Aviva 16%, Esure 26% and Hedgehog 44%.

How to use a credit card to pay for car insurance

Interest-free credit cards let you spend for a set period of time without being charged interest, after which point you are.

However, you still have to make monthly repayments and if you miss them can see your 0% interest deal removed.

But they can be a good option if you need to cover an up front cost, like an annual payment for car insurance.

In this case, you would pay for your car insurance up front using the credit card, then pay off the balance each month.

This of course means you would have to work out how much you need to pay off each month so you are not left with any outstanding balance after the 0% interest period ends.

As an example, if your car insurance policy cost £480 for the year and your 0% period lasted 12 months, you would need to pay off £40 on the credit card each month.

You may also be able to pay a minimum payment each month, which makes your repayments more manageable.

However, you may breach the 0% interest period and have to pay interest on any outstanding balance which will cost you more overall.

Meanwhile, if you’re using a normal credit card to pay for your car insurance up front, paying just the minimum amount each month may be more expensive than paying your insurer monthly if it means you are paying off the loan, and the interest on that loan, over a longer time.

Of course, always bear in mind that a credit card is still borrowing and if you are using one to pay for your car insurance, try limiting it to just that and don’t use it on other spending as your repayment costs could rack up.

If you do miss monthly repayments, you can be hit with late payment fees with the typical charge around £12.

Meanwhile, not everyone will be eligible for a 0% credit card and you may be refused one if your credit rating is poor.

You can check our the best credit card deals by going on price comparison sites like MSE, MoneySuperMarket and Compare the Market.

How else to save money on car insurance

Tom Banks, car insurance expert from GoCompare previously told The Sun it’s worth parking your vehicle in a garage or driveway, if you have one, as parking off-road can lower the chances of it being vandalised or stolen.

“Insurers will deem you as less of a risk to insure, thereby lowering your premium,” he explained.

If you’ve got the budget, consider installing alarms and other safety devices in your car too.

“These could help bring your car insurance cost down, as well as keeping your vehicle safe,” Tom advised.

Up your voluntary excess as well – this is the maximum figure you have to pay if you are involved in an accident.

By increasing your excess, you are taking on more financial responsibility for your driving – insurers reward this by offering you a cheaper premium.

If you’ve recently added any modifications to your car, make sure they are included in your policy to ensure you’re covered as well.

If not, you may find your policy is invalidated and you’re forced to pay out over the odds in the case of an accident.

What is car insurance?

Consumer reporter Sam Walker talks you through what car insurance is and what it covers you for…

Car insurance pays out if your vehicle is stolen, damaged, catches on fire or is involved in an accident.

As a minimum, it protects you against any damage you case to other road users, the public or their property – these are called third parties.

You only need to claim on your car insurance when an accident is your fault.

Advertisement

If another motorist is to blame, their insurance should pay out instead.

Car insurance, unlike home insurance, is a legal requirement and if you don’t have it you can be fined up to £1,000.

You can also have your vehicle seized and destroyed.

However, you don’t need to insure your car if it is classed as “off-road”, or holds a statutory off road notification (SORN).

Advertisement

The vehicle has to be kept on private land and not a public highway though.

Do you have a money problem that needs sorting? Get in touch by emailing money-sm@news.co.uk.

Plus, you can join our Sun Money Chats and Tips Facebook group to share your tips and stories