The stream will last for about 50 minutes, followed by a deep dive into gameplay.
Kamil Switalski/Unsplash
It’s been a busy, busy week in the world of video games. PlayStation and Xbox both held showcases amid the maelstrom of Summer Game Fest. Nintendo isn’t going to stand by and be left out of the party this time, though. Via its Nintendo Today app, the company announced a Nintendo Direct stream for June 9. It’ll start at 10AM ET and you can watch it on YouTube or below.
The Direct will run for about 50 minutes and feature games for both Nintendo Switch and Switch 2. Afterwards, we’ll slide into a Nintendo Treehouse stream, which will last for about 95 minutes and feature gameplay from several games shown during the Direct.
Advertisement
Nintendo currently has Fire Emblem: Fortune’s Weave and an exclusive FromSoftware game, The Duskbloods, on its slate for the remainder of 2026. Perhaps we’ll get release dates for those.
This year marks the 40th anniversary of the Zelda series, so maybe we’ll get some news on the franchise during this Direct too (such as another look at the upcoming movie). For what it’s worth, rumors have suggested a remake of The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time is in the works.
Apple has announced a refreshed version of the iPhone’s Screen Time features for iOS 27, giving parents a new way to ensure children only access the content that’s right for them.
Alongside iOS 27, parental controls will also extend to the iPad with iPadOS 27 and the Mac, with macOS 27.
Screen Time has long allowed parents to limit which apps their kids use, and how long they can use them. With iOS 27, announced at WWDC 2026, Apple has refreshed the way this system works.
New for iOS 27 and beyond
With iOS 27, Apple makes it easier for parents to create a new Apple Account for their children. They’ll be shown how to modify their child’s access to the apps installed on that device. More apps can be enabled over time, too.
Advertisement
Apple also announced that iOS 27 will build on an existing feature that allows children to request access to an app. With iOS 27 installed, this will be expanded to include websites, giving parents the ability to preview the site before approving it for viewing.
With Apple’s 2026 software updates, kids will also be warned if they receive an iMessage that includes blood or gore. Currently, this feature is limited to images with possible nudity.
Time Allowances will give parents more control over how long and when their children can use their devices. Building on the existing Screen Time features, Time Allowances is a clearer, more easily managed system at a time when screen time is a hot topic for parents.
To help back up this refreshed and expanded Screen Time experience, developers will be given a slew of APIs to use. Apple’s new software updates will then hook into these APIs when managing a child’s access to apps and features.
Advertisement
Apple’s new software updates are set to be made available for all of its platforms later in 2026.
Engineers as well as designers from Axiom Space and Prada pulled back the curtain last weekend in New York on the inner layer that will sit closest to astronauts during future lunar surface work. The garment forms a key piece of the AxEMU spacesuit developed for NASA’s Artemis program. Astronauts step into this form-fitting piece first. Light gray fabric stretches across the body in a streamlined silhouette while clear tubing traces deliberate paths over the torso, arms, and legs. A single red stripe runs down one sleeve as a quiet nod to Prada’s activewear roots.
Water flows through the primary network of tubes, absorbing heat from the astronaut’s muscles. That warmed liquid then travels to the portable life support system strapped to the astronaut’s back, where it releases its heat into space. Meanwhile, an entirely distinct system supplies new oxygen to the helmet and collects exhaled carbon dioxide, which is then cleaned and reused. In fact, added redundancy adds another layer of protection: a second, fully operational cooling loop runs parallel to the first. If the main system fails, the backup system takes over seamlessly, ensuring that temperature control is never disrupted during one of these excursions.
BUILD AN OFFICIAL NASA ROCKET – Kids prepare to explore outer space with the LEGO Technic NASA Artemis Space Launch System Rocket (42221) building…
3-STAGE ROCKET SEPARATION – Young builders can turn the hand crank to watch the rocket separate in 3 distinct stages: solid rocket boosters, core…
STEM BUILDING TOY FOR KIDS – This educational rocket kit was created in collaboration with NASA and ESA to showcase the authentic system that will…
Prada contributed decades of expertise in high-end textiles, unique knitting processes, and precision garment manufacturing to this project. Axiom offered aerospace expertise, life support integration, and 3D modeling tools that designed each tube route to improve cooling efficiency while allowing the wearer to move freely. The two teams worked back and forth through several different models, determining which materials performed best in certain scenarios and on different body types. A set of connectors at the waist connects the garment’s tubes directly to the rest of the suit’s systems. The entire design is suitable for eight-hour spacewalks and is built to be reused over long-duration missions, thanks to specific fibers selected with Prada’s involvement.
This suit’s inner layer outperforms the spacesuits currently deployed on the International Space Station. The earlier designs just did not have that level of built-in backup cooling, and the degree of customisation available with these newer suits is a huge advantage. Materials were also chosen to solve specific issues connected with the lunar environment, such as plasma interactions, which prior suits were never designed to handle. Axiom Space was awarded a contract from NASA to develop these suits several years ago. The qualification gear is presently being tested on the ground, with an in-space demonstration scheduled for next year, and the company is on track to support crewed trips to the lunar surface during the Artemis IV mission later this decade. [Source]
After being requested for years, Capcom is finally bringing one of its Resident Evil titles back to life. Resident Evil Veronica has been announced for a 2027 release, bringing back Resident Evil Code: Veronica–all with modernized gameplay, a reimagined storyline, and of course, next-gen visuals. The game is headed to PlayStation 5, Xbox Series X/S, Nintendo Switch 2, and PC via Steam.
Claire Redfield takes the lead again
Capcom
Just like before, Resident Evil Veronica kicks off after the events of Resident Evil 2. A couple of months after the Raccoon City disaster, Claire travels to France in search of her brother, Chris Redfield. However, the reunion goes awry with Umbrella’s special forces capturing her and sending her to Rockfort Island, which soon becomes another biological disaster zone.
This was the exact setup for Code: Veronica, which is also what set it apart from the other mainline entries in the popular franchise. It was never numbered, which made it easier for casual players to skip, but it is far from a throwaway side entry. It continues Claire and Chris Redfield’s story, leans heavily into Umbrella’s lingering mess, and helps bridge the older survival-horror era with the more dramatic tone the franchise would later embrace.
Why fans have been waiting for this remake
Resident Evil Code: Veronica has long sat in an odd place within the series, overlooked by some because it was not a numbered entry, but kept alive by a dedicated fanbase that never stopped asking for its return. With more older titles getting fresh remakes, it made sense for Veronica to be next–and Capcom did not disappoint. Resident Evil Veronica preserves the essence of the 2000 game while adding modern gameplay and a reworked story.
Advertisement
Capcom
The original Code: Veronica is beloved, but it is also one of the less forgiving classic Resident Evil games. Its old-school structure, harsh resource management, and dated controls made it memorable for the right and wrong reasons. So a modern remake could make it far more approachable without losing the nasty, isolated atmosphere that made Rockfort Island stand out.
At the moment, Capcom has only given Resident Evil Veronica a broad 2027 release window. The Steam page does not list a price or exact launch date yet, and system requirements are still marked as TBD. Even with those missing details, this is a big one for Resident Evil fans. After remakes of Resident Evil 2, Resident Evil 3, and Resident Evil 4, Code: Veronica was the obvious unfinished business. Now, it is finally getting its turn.
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Monday asked tech companies operating in the UK to prevent children from taking, sending and receiving nude images. If they fail to do so, the UK will change the law, he said.
“I am calling on tech companies operating in this country to introduce device controls that prevent children from sending and receiving sexually explicit images,” Starmer said in a speech at London Tech Week. “This is not an impossible challenge. These are some of the most innovative companies in the world and I believe they can solve it, but if they choose not to, then we will act.”
The British government is asking tech companies, including Apple and Google, to put in place device-level controls to prevent nude images of children within the next three months. It wants the technology to be available across both new and existing phones.
Advertisement
“Google is deeply committed to protecting children online. We are working constructively with UK partners to find effective, privacy-preserving solutions that deter the spread of harmful content while ensuring a safe digital environment for young people,” said a Google spokesperson in an emailed statement.
A representative for Apple didn’t immediately respond to a request for comment.
Many children, especially teenagers, take, share and receive naked photos without their parents being aware. This behavior is illegal and also puts children at risk of blackmail, bullying, sexual harassment or child exploitation. The UK is the first country to demand that tech companies help keep children safe by preventing them from taking nude photos and circulating them online.
Advertisement
In a statement supporting Starmer’s announcement on device controls, the UK’s National Crime Agency said the restrictions have the potential to stop some of the most serious forms of online child sexual abuse before they begin.
“Many of the most serious cases begin with offenders coercing children into creating and sharing sexual images of themselves,” said Graeme Biggar, NCA director general. “Once those images exist, they can be used for blackmail, humiliation and repeated exploitation. Preventing children from taking, sharing or receiving nude images can stop abuse before it starts and so would be an important step forward.”
But not everyone welcomed Starmer’s comments. “Protecting children online is vital, but these are outrageous plans that will fail to address the underlying causes of online harm,” Silkie Carlo, director of rights group Big Brother Watch, said in a statement. “This will only result in population-wide ID checks for all of us to use our phones, tablets and laptops.”
Starmer’s request isn’t designed to prevent adults from taking and sending nudes, but attempts to make the internet safer for young people can also affect adults online. The UK’s Online Safety Act requires that many corners of the internet, including Reddit, verify the ages of people accessing their services. In the same way, it’s entirely possible that this request could result in people having to prove their identity in order to use a device without a child lock.
PwC’s Raymond Martin explores his day to day at the intersection of technology and healthcare.
“I lead technology-driven transformation for PwC’s health sector clients in Ireland, helping them improve patient care, expand access to services and run more efficient operations,” said Raymond Martin, a health technology director for the organisation.
He explained that, more and more, healthcare teams are being asked to do more with the same resources, so targeted transformation using technology is often the single biggest lever for change.
Here he discusses his day to day at PwC.
Advertisement
If there is such a thing, what is a typical day in your job like?
There really isn’t one and that’s a positive. The pace of change across technology, health and business over the last five years has been astonishing and AI has put it into overdrive in the last two.
My time tends to split three ways. First, overseeing live client delivery, technology roll-outs in acute hospitals, community teams and national programmes, often involving significant redesign of care pathways to enhance collection and use of data and promote data and process standardisation. Second, working with our clinical and operational experts to shape new services based on what clients are asking for and the trends we’re seeing globally. Third, helping our PwC team evolve and working out what the market shift means for our people, their skills and their careers.
In the more than 20 years you have worked in the health-tech space, how has the landscape evolved?
It’s night and day. 20 years ago, health-tech was dominated by back-office systems, heavy custom development, complex configuration projects and clinical systems that were largely paper-based or niche high tech. Delivery of any change took years.
When I started on Medicaid systems in the US in 2008, the average time from design to first release was four years and some releases might be a year apart. Five years later, working on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act in California, that had dropped to two years. The explosion of cloud infrastructure and SaaS platforms brought it down to under a year and Covid compressed it again to months.
Advertisement
During Covid, for the New Mexico Department of Health, I led a team through mobilisation of a contact centre, CRM deployment and the onboarding of hundreds of staff, beginning operations within 30 days and adding most functionality within three months of that. The challenge for us is making sure governance and methodology keep pace so speed doesn’t introduce new risk. The other big shift is the democratisation of technology. 20 years ago, technology was a niche skill. Today our clients come prepared, fluent in the tools and often using AI to enhance their own awareness and position in conversations.
How is technology transforming the future health space?
It’s hard to find a corner of healthcare that technology won’t touch. The clinician-patient relationship will remain the human core, but everything around it is changing fast. Data is the first frontier. Healthcare generates extraordinary volumes of rich data, but it has historically been trapped in silos, useful inside one system or location, invisible everywhere else.
Joining that data across boundaries unlocks huge value, like better national and local service planning for a start. With better access to clinical data and the ability to augment it with lifestyle data from wearable devices and eating habits, patients can actively manage their own health as well as their care journeys. The most obvious advantage is it gives clinicians a fuller picture of the person in front of them.
Beyond the clinical interaction, cloud platforms and AI are reshaping access to care. Virtual consultations, remote monitoring and hospital-at-home are becoming normal. AI assistants will help people build healthier habits and manage conditions preventatively. Genetic screening will drive tailored therapies into the mainstream and AI-accelerated trials will shorten the path from discovery to approval. And that’s just the start.
Advertisement
What are some of the challenges and how are they managed?
The pace of technology change is now stress-testing the governance and procurement models organisations rely on. They simply weren’t built for this rate of arrival.
Healthcare and public sector clients feel it most because they operate in highly regulated environments and rightly so. Patient safety, public confidence, data privacy and responsible use of public money are the currencies they trade in.
‘Move fast and break things’ is not a viable strategy in a hospital. Processes must be proven safe and compliant before they can be adopted. Our role is to help our clients adopt new technology at pace without compromising on those fundamentals, putting the right methodologies, assurance frameworks and clinical governance in place so innovation and safety move forward together.
Another challenge our clients are grappling with is finding the right path to adopt AI and get real return on the investment. That came through clearly in PwC’s recent Global Performance Survey. The answer is moving beyond isolated proof-of-value pilots into AI-enabled process handling at scale, and examining growth opportunities rather than just cost savings. In healthcare, that translates to taking administrative burden off frontline and back-office staff, applying AI to the problems it’s genuinely better at. That’s where real value can be unlocked.
Advertisement
Are you noticing new and emerging trends so far in 2026?
AI is the story of 2026. It has moved out of novelty and experimentation into mainstream adoption. A significant share of the population now uses it daily, including clinicians and patients. People have seen what AI does for the customer service they get from their insurance company, their utility provider, or their streaming service and they expect the same standard from their healthcare provider. Chat tools mean patients arrive at appointments better informed about their own conditions, which is changing the dynamic of consultations. We’re also seeing native AI companies turn their focus to health, which will accelerate the pipeline of AI-driven products coming to market.
Have you any advice for professionals interested in a career similar to yours?
Stay positive. There’s a lot of pessimism in the headlines about disruption and changing business models, but disruption is often the biggest accelerator of opportunity. If you look beyond the displacement headlines, there’s a bigger story about the opportunities being created by AI.
This is the fifth major technology disruption cycle of my career, starting with the dot-com crash in 2001. I was an intern expecting a graduate job that didn’t materialise because of the crash. That led to a different job and a career that took me from Ireland to the US, Canada, India, the UK and a few places in between.
Every cycle since, from the financial crash of 2008 to the cloud and SAAS revolution of 2011, even Covid, has been initially destructive but has ultimately created more opportunities for people in this industry. This is the reality we’re seeing as right now we are growing and hiring for our advisory health team.
Advertisement
My second piece of advice, don’t wait for doors to be opened for you. Ask. Tell people what you’re interested in, ask for new roles, ask for introductions, find out what’s possible. You manage your own career. That’s as true now as it has ever been.
Don’t miss out on the knowledge you need to succeed. Sign up for the Daily Brief, Silicon Republic’s digest of need-to-know sci-tech news.
Jeff Bezos is backing Flourish, a new “neuro AI” startup with $500 million in funding and a reported $2.5 billion valuation, that aims to reinvent AI by studying the brain’s architecture and building systems that learn continuously while using far less power than today’s large language models. The company’s long-term bet is that neuroscientists and AI researchers working together can uncover the brain’s “core algorithm” and eventually create brain-inspired AI that runs on a tiny fraction of current compute. Wired reports: Rob Williams knows how to pitch Jeff Bezos: You write a press release as if your product has already been built. Bezos reads it and gives a thumbs up or down. Williams went through this process a lot as an executive on Amazon’s “S-team,” in charge of software products such as Alexa, until his departure last fall. But the pitch he made a few weeks later — in December 2025 — was different. Now he was collaborating with Thomas Reardon, a neuroscientist and repeat startup founder, and approaching Bezos as a funder, not a boss. Here’s what Bezos, sitting on his yacht somewhere, read while Williams anxiously watched on Zoom: “Flourish is a neuro AI company that is solving the two most difficult problems facing AI today: power efficiency and continuous learning. We are building Cortex AI, the first synthetic intelligence system designed to match the computational capacity, learning efficiency, and power budget of the human brain.”
A month later, I’m lunching with Reardon and Williams in the Flatiron neighborhood in New York City. Reardon gets right to the point. AI has dug itself into a hole, he says. Though increasingly powerful, large language models are greedy consumers of computer power and data. Though the inspiration for LLMs was rooted in biology, current frontier models have little in common with the human brain. A person uses about 20 watts of energy to process information; a single chip in an AI training cluster uses more than 30 times that amount. The hyperscalers require thousands of chips and gigawatts of energy, enough to power small cities. And those models need to suck up virtually all of what humans have written. Each new model requires more, more, more. For all of that, the models don’t learn. Once you train them, they’re stuck. The goal, Reardon tells me, is to build “a synthetic artificial intelligence brain that runs on 50 watts or less.” It should adapt to its conditions, be as nimble as a human mind, and burn a tiny fraction of an LLM’s compute power and energy. The proof of concept is thriving inside our skulls. “There’s something fundamentally wrong with saying, “I need to basically read every book ever written 20 times over in order to learn English,’” Reardon says. “A human baby does it with a couple hundred thousand utterances.”
Reardon and Williams haven’t figured out yet how to build systems that match the magic of a human brain. What they have is a belief that an expert, well-resourced team — of AI researchers and neuroscientists working essentially side by side — can find the answer. The neuroscientists will conduct original wet lab experiments with some of the most advanced lab equipment available, to hunt for usable intel on the brain’s architecture. They plan to release the models they’re currently developing as near-term products on the path to a full reinvention of AI. The fuzziness of the proposal didn’t bother Jeff Bezos. After reading Williams’ two-pager, he chipped in $50 million. Other funding came from Lux Capital, Google Ventures, and Catalio, among others. Bezos then almost doubled his initial stake and told Reardon he’d have given more if they’d asked. Now with a war chest of $500 million and a reported valuation of $2.5 billion, Flourish just needs to invent a new way to do AI.
By most accounts, HIGH END Vienna 2026 was a success, and that is no small thing for an industry that could use some good news as we begin the slow crawl into summer. The move from Munich to Vienna was always going to be scrutinized, second-guessed, and overanalyzed by people who spend too much time arguing about cable elevators, but the first edition in Austria appears to have landed well. The rooms were busy, the product pipeline was stronger than expected, and manufacturers showed up with enough new hardware to suggest that high-end audio may finally be catching some tailwinds again.
Good. The industry needs them.
There are already five more shows on the calendar between now and September: T.H.E. Show SoCal, CanJam London, Audio Advice Live 2026, CanJam SoCal, and CEDIA. Audio Advice Live has become a more important stop this year, and I will be joining Chris Boylan in Raleigh in early August rather than covering SWAF in Dallas in late-July.
At some point, even editors need to recharge the batteries, spend time with their kids, clean up the house, paint a few walls, and fix whatever winter broke before summer arrives to break something else. The Jersey Shore is already preparing for its annual stress test: Netflix Studios construction, World Cup traffic threatening to paralyze half the Garden State, and the return of the Bennies, who descend every year like a seasonal weather event with beach chairs, parking issues, and questionable lane discipline.
Advertisement
So yes, I’m thinking very carefully about how to manage the rest of 2026 starting in late-July.
That is especially true when eCoustics is on pace for roughly 1,200 articles, videos, and podcasts in 2026. That puts us behind only What Hi-Fi? in terms of output, and well ahead of most of the specialist audio press. That kind of schedule is not powered by Austrian pastries and blind optimism. It takes planning, travel, editing, late nights, and a team willing to do the unglamorous work that most readers never really notice.
HIGH END Vienna 2026 Proved There Is Life After Munich, Even With More Schnitzel and Viennese Caffeine
Editor-at-Large, Chris Boylan will have more to say in his Best of Show report, along with more video reports from HIGH END Vienna dropping this week. My focus here is slightly different. These are the 11 new products from the show that most caught my attention, the ones I most want to review when they become available, and the products that say something meaningful about where the market may be headed next.
Because there is a bigger point here.
Advertisement
The audio industry may be finding some momentum again, but it still needs to learn how to market itself without tripping over the same gold-plated rake. Not every new product is a “new reference.”
Arnold Schwarzenegger once said, “The worst thing I can be is the same as everybody else.” For the hi-fi industry, that might be the most useful Austrian export of the week. HIGH END Vienna 2026 proved there is still life in the category, but the brands that matter going forward will be the ones willing to stop sounding, looking, pricing, and marketing themselves exactly like everyone else.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
The Dirty Eleven: 11 Vienna 2026 Products to Review
Acoustic Energy AE Active
The Acoustic Energy AE Active is a fully analog active stand-mounted loudspeaker with Class A/B amplification, RCA and XLR inputs, room-trim controls, and an updated driver package that looks like a focused evolution of the AE1 Active.
That may sound almost quaint in 2026, which is precisely why I want to hear it. Most active speakers now arrive with apps, firmware updates, streaming platforms, Bluetooth logos, and enough software baggage to make you wonder whether you bought loudspeakers or adopted a small IT department. Acoustic Energy has gone in the other direction: wired inputs, analog signal path, onboard amplification, and a very clear focus on the box, the drivers, and the amplifier doing their jobs properly. Radical stuff, apparently.
Advertisement
I want to hear whether Acoustic Energy has improved on the AE1 Active without sanding down the speed, impact, and immediacy that made the original such a compelling compact loudspeaker. The real test will be placement, bass control, tonal balance at sane listening levels, and whether the room-trim controls are actually useful in smaller spaces, and not just switches added to make the rear panel look busy.
The other part of the review is the use case. The AE Active has a very limited number of inputs, so I want to hear how it interacts with the preamp sections in a range of network players and DAC/preamps. If the source/preamp pairing matters, and with active loudspeakers, it usually does — that needs to be part of the review, not an afterthought buried somewhere between “nice imaging” and “good for desktop use.”
The Klipsch Rebellion is a premium Heritage-inspired standmount loudspeaker based on Paul W. Klipsch’s rare 1958 H8 design, using a K-702 tweeter mounted to a K-703 Tractrix horn with Mumps technology, a new K-81-EP woofer, and a rear Tractrix flare port.
Klipsch has been leaning hard into its 80th anniversary, and the Rebellion is far more interesting to me than another nostalgia badge glued to a walnut box. It is not cheap at $2,599 per pair, but the idea of a compact Heritage-flavored Klipsch loudspeaker that does not require La Scala real estate or a second mortgage has real appeal. The category needs speakers with high sensitivity, dynamics, personality, and some actual fun baked into the cabinet, because not everyone wants another polite rectangular box that sounds like it was voiced during a faculty meeting.
Advertisement
What I want to test is how flexible the Rebellion really is with amplification. On paper, this could be a very interesting match for everything from affordable Class D amplifiers like WiiM’s current crop, to older Class A/B integrated amps from NAD, Cambridge, and Rega, to tube integrated amplifiers from a wide range of manufacturers. The review has to find out whether the Rebellion keeps the Klipsch energy and immediacy without getting shouty, whether it can work in real rooms without punishing placement, and whether it has enough tonal refinement to win over listeners who like the Heritage attitude but do not want to live inside a live PA system.
The Cambridge Audio Evo 300 is a 300Wpc streaming amplifier built around Hypex NCOREx power, StreamMagic Gen 4, HDMI eARC, MM phono, and the same basic “just add speakers and stop building equipment towers” argument that has made the Evo series so compelling.
The extra power is the headline, but it is not the only thing I care about. The Evo 75, Evo 150, and Evo 150 SE never really ran out of gas with the speakers I tried them with, including models from Q Acoustics, Acoustic Energy, PSB, Focal, and others. More power is rarely a bad thing, unless we are talking about politicians or subwoofers in apartments, but the Evo platform was already more capable than some people gave it credit for.
What I want to test is whether Cambridge has actually moved the amplifier section forward, not just added a bigger number to the brochure. Does the Hypex NCOREx implementation sound cleaner, faster, and more composed than the earlier Evo models? Is StreamMagic Gen 4 easier to use day to day? Does HDMI eARC behave properly with real TVs? Does the MM phono input feel like a serious part of the product or a convenience feature? The Evo 300 needs to prove that it is not just the Evo with more horsepower, but a more complete streaming amplifier for people who want fewer boxes without lowering their standards.
The Canvas L is a premium TV-mounted active speaker system that now supports larger screen sizes, offers more finish and grille options, and uses BACCH 3D+ processing to make the case that a very serious “soundbar” can replace a conventional front-channel system.
The price has gone up. A lot. That does not automatically make it a problem, but it does move the Canvas L into a very different conversation, especially when buyers can also look at strong active loudspeakers, compact 3.0 or 3.1 systems, and increasingly ambitious lifestyle audio products from brands with serious hi-fi credibility. The ability to pair it with larger TVs makes sense because that is where the market has gone, and I like the grille options because not everyone wants their living room to look like a demo room at an audio show staffed by people named Lars.
Can the Canvas L can actually replace a proper 3.0 or 3.1 system through output, tonal scale, dialogue clarity, center image stability, and BACCH 3D+ spatial processing — especially because there is no separate subwoofer in the system. I was a guinea pig for the original BACCH work at the lab in Princeton and at the designer’s home, and I have wanted this technology to work properly in a real consumer product for probably eight or nine years. The review has to answer the uncomfortable question: is this finally the elegant living-room solution that can satisfy movie and music listeners, or is it still asking too much from one very expensive box attached to a television?
The DALI VEGA is a $4,500 single-box wireless hi-fi system with ten in-house-developed drivers, 400 watts of Class D amplification, BluOS streaming, HDMI ARC, AirPlay 2, TIDAL Connect, Spotify Connect, and adaptive processing that lets it work horizontally or vertically.
This type of system is becoming a real category, and I am perfectly fine with that. Products like the VEGA, Focal’s Mu-so Hekla, Canvas L, LIVEBOX, and Ruark’s larger all-in-one console systems are forcing people to pay attention because they are not just Bluetooth speakers with better tailoring. They are aimed at people who want serious sound without separates, speaker cables, and a rack that looks like it belongs in a regional airport control room.
The Naim influence is obvious; sorry, Salisbury, everyone found the big dial — but the category has moved beyond imitation. The Naim/Focal room at AXPONA 2026 was standing-room-only primarily because of the Mu-so Hekla demo, and people were not pretending to be impressed. They were impressed.
What I want to test is whether the VEGA can work as well in real rooms as it does on paper. The Adaptive Orientation Adjustment is not a gimmick if it can make the system sound convincing both horizontally on furniture and vertically on a wall, but that has to be tested with real placement compromises, not a brochure-perfect room with one chair and no family members. The dog can stay.
Advertisement
I want to hear whether DALI’s Adaptive Stereo Enhancement creates real width and scale without turning everything into processed vapor, whether the bass has enough weight without getting thick, and whether BluOS, HDMI ARC, presets, EQ, wall-distance adjustment, and that rather lovely control dial make the VEGA feel like a proper living-room hi-fi system rather than another expensive lifestyle object asking for Scandinavian forgiveness.
The Eversolo DMP-A8 Gen 2 is a digital hub that combines streaming, DAC, preamp, local music-server functionality, internal SSD support, HDMI ARC, subwoofer control, balanced analog outputs, AKM DAC architecture, Wi-Fi 6, and SFP fiber networking in one very polished box.
Advertisement. Scroll to continue reading.
Eversolo has become a serious player in network audio because its products usually offer strong hardware, useful software, and a feature set that makes some more expensive streamers look a little thin. The original DMP-A8 already made a strong case as a flexible digital front end, so the Gen 2 is interesting because it appears to refine the platform rather than reinvent it. The move to AKM, the addition of SFP fiber networking, broader system-control features, and continued emphasis on local storage all suggest Eversolo understands that many listeners want one digital component that can handle streaming, files, TV audio, and preamp duties.
Advertisement
What I want to test is whether the DMP-A8 Gen 2 improves the parts that matter in daily use. Does the AKM-based DAC architecture change the tonal balance or presentation in a meaningful way? Is the preamp section good enough to drive active speakers or a serious power amplifier without making a dedicated preamp feel mandatory? Does SFP fiber networking offer a practical benefit in a real home network, or is it mostly there for the people who already own three Ethernet switches and strong opinions about optical isolation?
The Meze Audio ARTA is a $6,000 open-back flagship headphone built around a new 225-ohm Rinaro Isodynamic Hybrid Array driver, with the kind of industrial design, materials, and Romanian craftsmanship that have become central to Meze’s identity.
Having owned the Empyrean II for a few years, I can attest to how good Meze can be when it gets the balance right. The Empyrean II is brilliant from both a design and performance perspective: comfortable, beautifully made, musically generous, and far more than a piece of headphone jewelry for people who alphabetize their cables. That is why the ARTA interests me, but also why the price gives me pause. At $6,000, it is walking straight into the same rarefied air occupied by statement headphones from Audeze, HiFiMAN, ZMF, and others. The question is not whether Meze can build something spectacular. It can. The question is whether the ARTA can be thousands of dollars better in ways that matter.
What I want to test is whether we are getting too close to the sun in the head-fi space. If the ARTA is spectacular, I will be thrilled, because I have invested a lot of money and professional capital in this Romanian brand and still believe Meze brings something different to the category. But spectacular is now the entry fee at this price. I want to hear whether the ARTA delivers more resolution, scale, speed, tonal sophistication, and emotional pull than the Empyrean II without losing the comfort and humanity that make Meze special.
Advertisement
Compared with $1 million loudspeakers, perhaps a $6,000 headphone is a bargain even after you add the amplifier, DAC, source, cables, stand, and the quiet room you apparently now need to justify listening to music by yourself.
The Questyle QMS system pairs the iXStreamer with the E5 and E4 wireless active bookshelf speakers, using SEAS drivers, Wi-Fi 6, LDAC, aptX, HDMI ARC/eARC, and Questyle’s own DAC/amplification thinking to build a more serious lossless wireless ecosystem.
This will not be cheap, and nobody should pretend otherwise. Questyle makes superb products, even if not every one of them has landed on my “Best of” list, because the company usually tries to do something different rather than just chase the same safe feature set as everyone else.
What I want to test is whether Questyle can make the system feel like real hi-fi and not just another premium wireless speaker platform. The E5, especially the Oceanic Blue co-branded SEAS version, is the one I want in for review because the concept only works if the loudspeakers deliver proper imaging, scale, tonal balance, and low-latency stability with TV, streaming, and hi-res playback.
Advertisement
I also want to know whether the iXStreamer actually makes the ecosystem easier to use, whether HDMI ARC/eARC behaves properly, and whether Questyle’s current-mode DNA translates into active loudspeakers without turning the whole thing into an expensive proof-of-concept for people who already own three DACs and still claim they are “simplifying.”
The Ruark R710 is a new CD hi-fi console in Ruark’s 100 Series, designed to sit above the R610 and work as a more ambitious all-in-one music system for listeners who still want CD playback, streaming, proper amplification, strong industrial design, and a system that does not require a rack of boring boxes.
I already heard the Talisman-R loudspeakers at a show, and they made a strong case for Ruark being far more than the company North American audiophiles seem determined to file under “nice radios.” But the R710 was the piece hiding in the wings, and that is the one that may tell us even more about where Ruark is headed. I have reviewed most of the brand’s recent kit, and the frustrating part is that it is consistently better than a lot of people on this side of the Atlantic seem willing to admit.
Advertisement
What I want to test is whether the R710 can finally make more North American listeners take Ruark seriously as a proper hi-fi brand, not just a lifestyle-audio company with good manners and better woodwork. The review needs to answer whether the R710 has enough amplifier control, scale, streaming stability, CD playback quality, and system flexibility to justify its position above the R610, especially with the Talisman-R as the obvious partner. Ruark has the design language, the usability, and the musical instincts. Now I want to know whether the R710 has the authority to make the “real audiophile gear” crowd stop smirking long enough to actually listen.
The Ruark Talisman-R is a compact two-way floorstanding loudspeaker; roughly 33.5 inches tall, rated at 87 dB sensitivity, with a 6-ohm nominal impedance that dips to 3.8 ohms, and Ruark recommends amplifiers between 50 and 250 watts.
Ruark is clearly positioning the Talisman-R as the natural partner for the new R710 CD hi-fi console, and that makes sense. But this speaker should not be treated as some locked-in accessory for one Ruark system. Those amplifier requirements open the door to a wide range of gear: modern Class D integrated amplifiers, older Class A/B amps, British integrateds with some grip and warmth, and better streaming amplifiers that need a compact floorstander with actual personality.
What I want to test is whether the Talisman-R is the Ruark product that finally makes more North American listeners stop treating the brand like a polite British radio company and start seeing it as serious hi-fi. If I had to pick a pair of speakers I am likely to buy by the end of 2026 for my new office, these, the Dynaudio Legend, and the DeVore Fidelity o/baby are the three strongest contenders. That is not a small compliment. I want to find out whether the Talisman-R has the tonal density, imaging, bass control, and amplifier flexibility to earn that spot — or whether I’m just being seduced again by British woodwork and my own terrible weakness for compact floorstanders.
The iFi iDSD GR2 is a $529 portable DAC/headphone amplifier with a Burr-Brown PCM1795 DAC, USB-C and S/PDIF inputs, 3.5mm and 4.4mm headphone outputs, Bluetooth with LDAC and aptX Lossless, iFi’s Nexis app control, and up to 1,513mW RMS into 32 ohms.
iFi has been very good at making portable DAC/amps that feel overbuilt in the right ways, but the category has become crowded, aggressive, and surprisingly good at lower prices. That makes the GR2 interesting because it has to justify itself against dongles, desktop DAC/amps, and wireless headphones that keep getting better. The price is reasonable by iFi standards, and it is lower than the outgoing xDSD Gryphon, but $529 is still real money for a device that many people will carry around, drop in a bag, and eventually panic-search for under a car seat.
What I want to test is whether the GR2 still makes sense in 2026 as a serious portable hub. Does the Burr-Brown PCM1795 implementation deliver the tonal density and smoothness iFi fans expect without getting too soft? Is the output powerful enough for more demanding headphones without turning sensitive IEMs into a hiss festival? Does Bluetooth sound good enough to be useful rather than merely convenient? And does the Nexis app, touchscreen interface, battery life, and hybrid power system make the GR2 easier to live with day to day, or is this another portable box that sounds excellent but demands the patience of someone assembling IKEA furniture in the dark?
London Tech Week opened the way these events increasingly do: with a leaderboard of investment pledges. By the end of the first morning, the UK had collected several billion pounds in AI commitments, most of it aimed at the unglamorous machinery of compute.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer kicked off the keynotes with a new national AI compute strategy, including £400mn to buy specialist AI chips and expand the country’s computing capacity, part of a push he framed around keeping British firms able to “start here, scale here and stay here”.
The bigger numbers came from industry.
AMD committed up to £2bn over five years, backing high-performance computing with the University of Cambridge and Imperial College and taking direct stakes in UK startups, with chief executive Lisa Su on stage to announce it.
Advertisement
Cloud provider Nebius pledged around £1.7bn to build out UK AI capacity, funding three new deployments of Nvidia infrastructure that will reach 65 megawatts by 2027 and expanding its London R&D hub.
London’s mayor, Sadiq Khan, added a smaller but pointedly different commitment: £12mn to help the city’s small businesses actually adopt AI, through readiness checks and mentoring, rather than build it. The Prince of Wales is due to appear later in the week, tying technology to his Homewards anti-homelessness initiative.
The backdrop is a UK tech sector that, by Tech Nation’s count, is now worth £1.2tn, with British AI startups raising more than £8.2bn in venture capital in the first half of 2026 alone, close to half of all European tech investment by the prime minister’s reckoning. Europe’s IT spending is forecast to grow 8.2 per cent this year to $1.3tn, its fastest in half a decade.
For a country anxious about being squeezed between the US and China, the figures are a useful retort.
There is a familiar tension under the optimism. Much of the money is for compute infrastructure, and most of that infrastructure runs on American technology: AMD’s chips, and Nvidia’s hardware inside Nebius’s data centres.
Advertisement
The UK’s sovereign-AI ambitions, real as they are, still lean heavily on US suppliers, a dependence the same week’s launch of Cosine’s home-grown “Lumen Sovereign” model was explicitly designed to chip away at. Building capacity in Britain is not the same as owning the stack.
Still, for one morning at Olympia, the direction of travel was clear, and loud.
Between government money, a US chipmaker’s billions, and a cloud firm’s data centres, the UK is betting it can be the place where Europe’s AI gets built. The harder question, as ever, is whether that turns into companies, jobs, and breakthroughs that stay, or simply more rented compute.
London Tech Week runs until 10 June, with the pitches, and the pledges, set to keep coming.
Miasma worm shapeshifts, but cloud secret-scouting remains the goal
Microsoft’s GitHub has disabled over 70 repositories after they were reportedly compromised by a worm in the latest open source supply chain attack.
The code shack took down 73 repos within the space of 105 seconds after its alarms were tripped on Friday, June 5, after detecting signs of the Miasma worm infecting its projects, according to StepSecurity’s co-founder and CTO, Ashish Kurmi.
Advertisement
Users reported issues quickly on Friday, after visits to those repos all resulted in the same message displayed, indicating that they had been disabled due to terms of service violations.
According to StepSecurity’s analysis, the attack kicked off after a compromised contributor account pushed a malicious commit to Azure/durabletask. The commit dropped configuration files that triggered remote code execution on machines when a developer opened the repo in an IDE or AI coding tool, such as Claude Code, Gemini CLI, and Cursor.
Several developers soon reported broken CI/CD pipelines, a support thread showed, although a moderator said at the time this was due to “an internal management issue.”
“The repo that most immediately caused issues was Azure/functions-action,” Kurmi wrote, used to deploy code to Azure. With it being taken down, every workflow that referenced Azure/functions-action@v1 stopped resolving.
Advertisement
GitHub stepped in a few hours after the repos were infected by the malicious commit. Its automated detections kicked in and disabled the repos in under two minutes, in two separate waves.
However, it was the borking of the durabletask family that hinted at the bigger picture, that the attack was indeed a re-opening of the previous Miasma worm attack that hit Microsoft last month.
Microsoft’s durabletask PyPi package was a previous target of the Miasma worm on May 19. Within a 35-minute window, three versions of the package were uploaded to PyPi, which planted infostealers on developers’ machines, specifically sniffing out cloud secrets and developer tool configurations on Linux systems.
Crucially, the re-targeting of durabletask suggests the tokens associated with the compromised developer account used to execute the PyPi attack were not fully rotated, allowing an attacker to gain access and push commits to GitHub, Kurmi said.
Advertisement
It was either that, or the contributor was re-compromised through the worm’s own propagation loop, or a different contributor’s token was used but the attacker altered the metadata to make it look like a repeated attack.
Cybercrime group TeamPCP claimed responsibility for developing Mini Shai Hulud, which itself is named after an earlier worm of the same name, sans “mini.”
However, because TeamPCP open-sourced Mini Shai Hulud, it’s difficult to tell whether it was also behind Miasma or if someone else took the reins on the follow-up project.
Advertisement
StepSecurity also reported that two days before the Microsoft attack, the same worm was making a nuisance of itself at npm, compromising more than 50 packages, including a Vapi.ai SDK with more than 408,000 monthly downloads.
The Register asked Microsoft for comment, but it did not immediately respond. ®
Photo credit: Sonny Dickson New photos of a production-style dummy device for Apple’s first foldable iPhone have surfaced online. They come from leaker Sonny Dickson and offer the clearest view of the design yet. Sonny Dickson, the leaker, provided images from several perspectives. The unit appears in both closed and fully open variants, with a screen installed for a more realistic appearance than the previous crude iteration.
When you turn the device off, it shows a compact exterior display that is about 5.5 inches across. The front-facing camera is located in the center, with a circular cutout at the top. If you are familiar with the traditional iPhone, you will see that this one is somewhat shorter and wider, similar to a passport held upright. However, when you fold it open, the experience changes dramatically. The internal display stretches to about 7.8 inches and has a broader, shorter aspect ratio, akin to an iPad mini. That leaves plenty of room for apps, videos, and split-screen work, assuming the software can adjust to the new configuration.
Unfold extraordinary with Google Pixel 10 Pro Fold; with Pixel’s largest screen and Gemini, Google’s most advanced AI, it’s made for…
Unlocked Android phone gives you the flexibility to change carriers and choose your own data plan[2]; it works with Google Fi, Verizon, T-Mobile…
The gearless, high-strength hinge makes it durable enough to handle about 10 years of folding[3]; plus, Pixel 10 Pro Fold is built with Corning…
In the close-up images, you can notice a little round camera hole in the upper-left corner of the huge inner screen. Apple used a similar technique to previous Android foldables here, marking the first time this format has been used on an iPhone display. The vertical wrinkle down the middle of the interior screen is one of the most noticeable features. It appears faint on the dummy, but speculations suggest that Apple was able to reduce the depth and angle of the fold by changing the hinge. With some fancy glass and adhesives, the crease should be even harder to see on the finished units.
When the device is closed, a horizontal camera bar occupies a portion of the rear. Two lenses are side by side on a raised plateau that resembles the camera section of the iPhone Air, but no telephoto lens is seen at this time, and there is a small cluster of holes for the rear microphone. Other notable elements in the photographs include a titanium frame, volume controls relocated to the top edge, and a side button with Touch ID for unlocking and making payments, as this design does not appear to have Face ID.
Rumors suggest that there will just be one color option available at launch. White is the only color indicated in recent leaks, though we may see different colors later, as Apple has done with previous iPhone releases. It all comes together to create a device that fits in your pocket for everyday use and transforms into something resembling a small tablet when opened. The outer screen is ideal for fast peeks and calls without having to unfold the entire device, while the inner screen is far more comfortable for long-term tasks. [Source]
You must be logged in to post a comment Login