Less than a week away from the UFC White House event that has been nearly a year in the making, it doesn’t seem like anyone is setting their sights low.

“We’re expecting Super Bowl-type numbers for this fight,” UFC CEO Dana White told TNT Fight Sports.

Advertisement

U.S. President Donald Trump, no stranger to hyperbole, at one point promised that this event would be “the greatest show on earth.” White House spokesman Davis Ingle was slightly more measured, calling it “one of the greatest and most historic sports events in history.”

Mark Shapiro, president and COO of UFC parent company TKO, has said the event will be “a once-in-a-generation moment.”

In other words, this is going to be big. Just how big — and for whom, exactly — remains to be seen.

Specific plans for the broadcast on Sunday, June 14, have been scarce so far. White has suggested that a portion of the undercard may air for free on CBS, with the top fights held in reserve for Paramount+ subscribers, but no exact schedule has been released as of yet. (Uncrowned reached out to a Paramount executive with questions about the broadcast plan, but did not receive a response.)

Advertisement

In a recent story from “The Hollywood Reporter,” executives from both TKO and Paramount suggested that one primary goal for the event is to drive signups on Paramount+, the streaming service that’s home to all UFC events under a behemoth seven-year, $7.7 billion deal.

“This is about sampling, new fans, casual viewers, a spectacle on a stage that will ultimately expand our audience, our viewership, and our success on Paramount+,” Shapiro told Wall Street analysts back in February. “We see this once-in-a-lifetime stage as a strategic investment to drive subscriber acquisition at Paramount+, massive audience sampling for the UFC overall, and Super Bowl-like earned media across the globe.”

But here’s where it gets tricky. As a network, CBS is available in almost every home in America that contains a television set. Paramount+, on the other hand, has reported somewhere around 80 million subscribers. If the UFC were to air some of the White House event prelim bouts on CBS, but keep the title fights in the main and co-main event exclusively on Paramount+, that could significantly limit the overall reach.

For the sake of comparison, the most recent Super Bowl drew an estimated 125.6 million viewers. Even if every single existing Paramount+ subscriber watched this event, the UFC would still need to pick up an additional 45 million viewers either through new subscriptions or other broadcast methods in order to hit the goal of “Super Bowl-type numbers.”

It’s not impossible, but it’s also not easy. This event will be up against the opening weekend of play in the 2026 FIFA World Cup, and potentially Game 6 of the Stanley Cup Finals. It also faces the resistance that’s now essentially built-in to any Trump-endorsed event, which is no small obstacle in a country where the President faces plummeting approval ratings.

Advertisement

That backlash potential became evident when Trump’s “Freedom 250” concert plans saw multiple artists, ranging from Martina McBride to Bret Michaels, withdraw in recent weeks. That alone suggests that Trump’s very vocal and visible association with this UFC event might be enough to turn some viewers away.

Even without polarizing political implications, MMA has long been a niche sport that appeals to a subset of American sports fans. Unarmed combat in the confines of a cage simply may not to everyone’s liking.

So what’s a reasonable bar for success? The recent MVP MMA debut on Netflix last month peaked with nearly 17 million viewers while averaging about 12.4 million, shattering the record as the most-watched U.S. MMA broadcast in history. If the UFC White House event doesn’t at least beat that mark, you’d have to think it would be a major disappointment after all this build-up and these promises of Super Bowl-level interest worldwide.

But a lot may depend on what the goal of this event really is. If it were purely about reaching the largest audience possible, you’d think it would air simultaneously on CBS and Paramount+. That would expose the UFC to the largest potential audience, while also increasing the Trump administration’s chances to come away boasting that it had met the goal of putting on a truly massive sporting event.

Advertisement

If a portion of the broadcast is limited to Paramount+, however, that would decrease the potential audience size while likely increasing the potential for immediate monetization. Telling people they have to subscribe to Paramount+ to see the top two bouts would almost certainly lead to a sudden injection of new signups. It also means inevitably playing to a smaller audience in the end, since not every viewer will be willing to add a new subscription service to their monthly bills.

There’s also the question of broader purpose for this event. If it’s truly a celebration of America, shouldn’t it be available to all Americans? Or at least those with a TV?

Then again, maybe there is something quintessentially American about charging a subscription fee even for our big birthday bash. We want big audiences, sure. But it’s paying crowds that keep the lights on.