Politics
100 public figures demand no terror sentencing for Filton 24 anti-genocide activists
Around 100 well-known public figures have signed an Artists for Palestine open letter describing the government’s plan to impose terror sentencing on four humanitarian activists as a “miscarriage of justice”.
Signatories include author Sally Rooney, activist Greta Thunberg, filmmaker Terry Gilliam, actor Steve Coogan, comedians Jen Brister and Alexei Sayle and law expert Lord John Hendy KC. After failing to gain convictions in their first trial, the state rigged the retrial of six ‘Filton 24’ activists to ensure convictions. The judge prevented the jury hearing that they had a right to acquit the defendants. He banned media from reporting on the fact that sentencing would be escalated as ‘terrorism’.
Even so, two activists were acquitted completely; all were acquitted of any violent intent. Four – Charlotte Head, Samuel Corner, Leona Kamio, and Fatema Zainab Rajwani – were convicted of criminal damage to an Israeli weapons factory. Sentencing is scheduled for this Friday, 12 June 2026. The judge has refused to recuse himself from the sentencing hearing because of the conflict of interest in his long links to UK security services.
Feeble state excuse for the Filton 24
The letter’s signatories urge judge Jeremy Johnson to drop use of a ‘terrorism connection’ in Friday’s sentencing, because imposing such sentencing after banning mention of it during the trial would be to:
bypass the jury and sentence a group of protesters as terrorists would constitute an extremely grave miscarriage of justice, with consequences far beyond this case alone,
The letter, also signed by actors Zoë Wanamaker, Miriam Margolyes, and Zawe Ashton, Palestinian writer Mohammed El-Kurd, Labour MP John McDonnell and musicians Charlotte Church and Kate Nash, notes the state’s feeble excuse for demanding terror sentencing: that the activists were trying to influence the Israeli government. Nobody believes the Israeli government was going to be influenced – the action was to damage weapons and save Palestinian lives.
Authors Marina Warner and Kamila Shamsie, scholars Paul Gilroy and Jewish academic Avi Shlaim, and actors Brian Cox and Tobias Menzies have all put their names to the call. Irish novelist Sally Rooney, herself a frequent target of Israel lobbyists for her stand against genocide, said:
Protest that poses no threat to the public simply is not terrorism. These activists may have knowingly risked their freedom in taking action, but they now face the prospect of punishment for crimes they were never convicted of and did not commit. This is an obvious effort to undermine solidarity with Palestine, but what it really undermines is UK law.
Singer Charlotte Church added:
The government failed in its duty to prevent genocide in Palestine. Now the courts are lashing out at young people who acted to try and stop it, when it’s those making weapons for Israel that should be facing jail.
Supporters have been asked to gather at Woolwich Crown Court on Friday to increase awareness of the state’s abuse of justice and process to protect Israel. The letter and signatories are reproduced below:
We, the undersigned, urge you to drop the use of the ‘terrorism connection’ in the sentencing of Charlotte Head, Samuel Corner, Leona (Ellie) Kamio, and Fatema Zainab Rajwani on June 12th 2026.
The four defendants were not charged with terrorism offences. They were not tried under terrorism laws. The jury was never informed of any proposed ‘terrorism connection’ during the trial and did not find any of the defendants guilty of any terror-related crimes. The proposed ‘terrorism connection’ is founded simply on a guilty verdict in relation to criminal damage. To bypass the jury and sentence a group of protesters as terrorists would constitute an extremely grave miscarriage of justice, with consequences far beyond this case alone.
It is a consensus view within the international legal community that Israel’s campaign of mass killing in Gaza has crossed the threshold of genocide. International law prohibits arms exports to any nation committing genocide or other atrocity crimes, but the UK has continued to supply Israel with weaponry. The defendants in this trial tried every means at their disposal to call for an end to this illegal arms supply: they marched in the streets, wrote to their MPs and joined university encampments. But the export of lethal weapons, and the mass killings they facilitated, continued.
Finally, in August 2024, the defendants took action. They entered a UK facility run by Israel’s largest arms producer, Elbit Systems, and dismantled weapons themselves. Their actions may well have saved lives. And yet, when facing trial, the defendants were not permitted to explain their motivations to the jury. Deprived of the full moral and humanitarian context, the jury found four of the six defendants guilty of ordinary criminal offences.
The conscientious motives of these activists – suppressed throughout the trial – may now be brought against them at the sentencing stage through the use of a ‘terrorism connection’. The only stated basis for this connection is that the defendants were ‘attempting to influence the Israeli government by restricting their access to weapons’. But virtually every international humanitarian organisation, including a group of expert UN Special Rapporteurs, has called for the same thing: the restriction of Israel’s access to weapons, in accordance with international law.
In this case, the purported ‘terrorism connection’ could extend the defendants’ prison sentences, require them to ‘rescind’ their deepest moral beliefs in order to be eligible for parole, and impose harsh restrictions on their freedoms even after their release. Never before has a link to terrorism been imposed at the sentencing stage in a criminal damage case. The implications for civil liberties in Britain are difficult to overstate.
Over 70,000 Palestinians have been killed in Gaza, including over 20,000 children. The Filton activists acted to uphold international law and defend human life. To sentence them on the basis of a ‘terrorism connection’ would not only be unjust and cruel: it would gravely undermine the right to protest and the impartiality of the judicial system itself. We demand that you reconsider before it is too late.
The Filton 24 letter has so far been signed by:
Alaa Abd El-Fattah, writer, campaigner, software developer
Khalid Abdalla, actor
Abubaker Abed, journalist
Susan Abulhawa, author
Mark Adderley, producer, director
Lolly Adefope, actor
Travis Alabanza, artist
Anthony Anaxagorou, poet, publisher
Huwaida Arraf, human rights attorney
Zawe Ashton, actor, playwright
Krystel Ball, independent analyst
Ronan Bennett, screenwriter
Emma Breschi, model, DJ
Jen Brister, comedian
Dunstan Bruce, musician
Debbie Campbell, ecologist
Joanna Carolan ,comedian
Grace Chatto, musician
Louise Christian, solicitor
Charlotte Church, singer-songwriter, actor
Caryl Churchill, playwright
Steve Coogan, actor, comedian, writer
Brian Cox, actor
Jasmine Cruickshank (jasmine.4.t), musician
Clare Daly, former Member of European Parliament
Jessica Darrow, actor, singer
Siobhan Davies, artist
Robert Del Naja, musician
Mohammed El Kurd, author, poet
Theo Ellis, musician
Brian Eno, composer, producer
Paapa Essiedu, actor
Bobby Gillespie, singer-songwriter
Terry Gilliam, film director, screenwriter
Paul Gilroy, writer, scholar
Lambrini Girls, band
Kerry Godliman, actor and comedian
Denise Gough, actress
Katharine Hamnett, designer
Misan Harriman, photographer
Eleanor Harrison, director
Rima Hassan, Member of European Parliment
John Hendy QC
Billy Howle, actor
Noah Huntley, actor
Sue Jones, casting director
Mali Koa Hood, musician
Florence Kosky, director
Yorgos Lanthimos, film director
Ruth Lass, actor
Paul Laverty, screenwriter
Alex Lawther, actor
Sophie Lewis, writer, scholar
Ken Loach, film director
Mikaela Loach, writer
Lowkey, rapper
Moshé Machover, professor, philosopher
Shirley Manson, musician
Miriam Margolyes, actor
Francesca Martinez, comedian, writer
Victoria Mary Clarke, writer
John McDonnell MP
Tobias Menzies, actor
Kate Nash, musician
Nyome Nicholas-Williams, model, writer
Fionn ó Loingsigh, actor
Ardal O’Hanlon, actor
Lola Olufemi, writer, researcher
Alice Oswald, poet
Maxine Peake, actor
Max Porter, writer
Bella Ramsey, actor
David Renton, barrister, historian
Sally Rooney, writer
Nadia Sawalha, TV Presenter, actor
Alexei Sayle, comedian, author, broadcaster
Graeme Segal, scholar, mathematics
Nadine Shah, singer-songwriter
Kamila Shamsie, writer
Avi Shlaim, emeritus professor of International Relations
Laila Souief, assistant professor of mathematics
Jack Steadman, musician
Maggie Steed, actor
Rahel Stephanie, chef, writer
Juliet Stevenson, actor
Joelle Taylor, writer, poet
Greta Thunberg, campaigner
Zing Tsjeng, journalist
Yanis Varoufakis, economist, academic and author
Bobby Vylan, musician
Harsha Walia, author
Mick Wallace, former MEP
Harriet Walter, actor, author
Zoë Wanamaker, actor
Marina Warner, writer, historian
Roger Waters, musician
Boff Whalley, writer and Musician
Jeremy Corbyn has called on potential new PM Andy Burnham to guarantee an independent public inquiry into UK state collusion in Israel’s genocide. Keir Starmer’s war on UK justice and human rights should put him behind bars in the Hague.
Featured image via the Canary
By Skwawkbox
Are we allowed to feel pure, cold rage yet? It’s what millions of us felt this morning as we watched footage of that barbarous assault in Belfast. However much the pleb-fearing thoughtpolice of Keir Starmer’s government might disapprove of such fury, it’s the emotion that swelled in all decent British and Irish people as they saw a brute rain stab after stab upon his sprawled, struggling victim. Good luck trying to curb the people’s rage over this act of wanton savagery.
It was truly obscene. On a dimly lit nighttime street in north Belfast, a kind of medieval butchery unfolded. A local man in his 40s was mercilessly pinned down by the knifeman. Each plunge of the knife was coldly, cruelly executed. The monster went for the man’s face, his neck, his back. The police announced this morning that the victim suffered ‘significant injuries to his eyes’. Was this an attempted eye-gouging? In the United Kingdom in 2026? Some are calling it an attempted beheading. Whichever it was, we now know the early media reports about a ‘knife incident’ were shamefully euphemistic, dolling up a monstrous atrocity in the garb of everyday crime.
Then came the most salient revelation, the one that imbued this feral exhibition of violence with political urgency – the suspect is Sudanese. The Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) tried to get the details out quickly, clearly having learned how much it riles the public when the truth about barbaric violence is withheld from us on the grounds that we’re too dumb and racist to handle it. The suspect is in his 30s, he seems to be from Sudan, and he got to Northern Ireland via Dublin. Oh, and he was granted leave to remain.
These findings change everything. Everything. Yes, only the blood-stained degenerate bears responsibility for the horrors inflicted on that innocent man. But we now know the piece of scum had an army of witless aiders and abetters. There lurks in the background of this abomination a whole regime of complicity. The wilfully oblivious technocrats who have overseen the withering of our borders. The spineless legal system that refuses to remove people who should not be here. The virtue-hoarding activist class that agitates for the right of every ‘asylum seeker’ to stay, because they cherish the spotlight of self-righteousness far more than they do the safety of working-class men and women. None of them wielded the knife, no; but all helped to pave the way for that reprobate’s presence in Belfast.
Isn’t there now a case against officialdom of reckless endangerment? Every week there are reports of horrifying rapes carried out by illegal immigrants. Working-class women and girls have suffered sickening abuse at the hands of men who came on small boats under the noses of our apathetic, cowardly rulers. People have been murdered, too. From the alleged rape gang overseen by Afghan nationals in Norwich to last night’s demented bloodletting in Belfast – when are we allowed to say this is all the bitter harvest of state failure, the predictable outcome of refusing to get a handle on who is coming here and why?
People are sick of paying the blood price of bourgeois virtue. That is increasingly how it feels to working-class communities – that they are expected to absorb the risk of letting in tens of thousands of unvetted men, while their betters absorb the glow of righteousness that comes with crying ‘Refugees welcome’. The activist class in their leafy suburbs are shielded from the social consequences of their moral theatre. It is the lower orders who suffer the fallout. Working-class girls who suddenly have 800 men from fuck knows where in the hotel at the end of their road. Women like Rhiannon Whyte, murdered by a Sudanese ‘asylum seeker’ from the very migrant hotel she worked in. This poor man in Belfast. It seems their suffering is a small price to pay for the moral gloating of our rulers.
This is why people are angry. Not because they’re racist. Not because they want all non-whites cast out of the kingdom. Such defamatory classist bile doesn’t wash anymore. No, it is the pathological nonchalance of the establishment that infuriates them, and the green light that such institutionalised cowardice gives to certain wicked men who come here. That image of the suspect in Belfast seeming to punch the air with bloodcurdling delight as his exhausted victim fought for his life – this will be burned into people’s minds. It deserves to become a defining image in the life of our nation. For it grimly embodies the twin horrors of an individual’s murderous intent and a state’s murderous indifference.
Already the political class is fretting more about the masses’ response to this apocalyptic event than the event itself. Just as Starmer lamented the calls for ‘pure, cold rage’ over the death of Henry Nowak, so they will seek to crush our outrage over the barbarism in Belfast. An MP for Northern Ireland’s Social Democratic and Labour Party is fuming about the ‘English right-wing politicians’ who might exploit this atrocity to ‘further their own ends’. Imagine witnessing such End Times violence and thinking, ‘Shit, how are people going to react?’. They are so lost. They are beyond lost.
It could have been worse. Had it not been for the intervention of passers-by – one of them using a hurling stick to beat the knifeman as the cops arrived – the victim would unquestionably have perished. The heroism of these good people deserves reward. And yet we can’t have a situation where the only thing standing between civilisation and barbarism is a hurling stick. So much moral repair is needed. And it needs to start now.
Brendan O’Neill is spiked’s chief political writer and host of the spiked podcast, The Brendan O’Neill Show. Subscribe to the podcast here. His latest book – After the Pogrom: 7 October, Israel and the Crisis of Civilisation – is available to order on Amazon UK and Amazon US now. And find Brendan on Instagram: @burntoakboy.
Just days before the start of the 2026 World Cup, the latest valuations from the website ‘Transfermarkt’ have revealed which clubs dominate the market. Paris Saint-Germain’s (PSG) rise to the top of the world’s most valuable clubs for the first time in its history, whilst Premier League clubs have exerted a striking dominance over the global elite.
Paris Saint-Germain oust giants from the top
The Parisian club has taken the top spot with a market value of €1.37 billion, ahead of second-placed Manchester City at €1.32 billion and Arsenal in third place at €1.25 billion.
This rise reflects the transformation the French club’s sporting project has undergone in recent years, relying on a group of the world’s most promising young talents and the rising market value of several of its stars, which has seen it overtake clubs that used to dominate the top of the table, such as Real Madrid and Barcelona.
Real Madrid came fourth with a value of €1.22 billion, followed by Barcelona in fifth place with €1.17 billion, whilst Chelsea retained sixth place after the value of its squad surpassed the €1 billion mark to reach €1.11 billion.
The Premier League dominates the scene
Although Paris Saint-Germain topped the list, the English Premier League was the biggest winner in the rankings, having made an exceptional showing with 11 clubs in the top 20.
Alongside Manchester City, Arsenal and Chelsea, the list included Liverpool, Manchester United, Tottenham Hotspur, Newcastle United, Nottingham Forest, Brighton, Bournemouth, Crystal Palace and Aston Villa, a clear indication of the significant economic gap between the English league and its European rivals.
Liverpool ranked eighth with a value of €940 million, whilst Manchester United came ninth with €752 million, ahead of Tottenham Hotspur and Newcastle United.
Notable surprises and the decline of some traditional powerhouses
The list was not without surprises, as Nottingham Forest managed to secure 13th place globally with a value of €578 million, ahead of established clubs such as Atlético Madrid and Juventus.
Bournemouth and Crystal Palace also made an unexpected appearance among the world’s top 20 clubs by market value, reflecting the financial boom experienced by English Premier League clubs in recent years.
In contrast, Bayern Munich came in seventh as the highest-ranked German club with a value of €958 million, whilst Inter Milan finished twelfth to top the Italian clubs with a value of €647 million, while Juventus slipped to twentieth place with a value of just €500 million.
With the World Cup fast approaching, these figures confirm that the balance of power in modern football is no longer measured by titles alone, but also by the value of the talent clubs possess and their ability to invest in the future, making the list of clubs with the highest market value a true reflection of the shifts the game is undergoing within the global economy.
List of the 20 most valuable clubs in the world
- Paris Saint-Germain — €1.37 billion
- Manchester City — €1.32 billion
- Arsenal — €1.25 billion
- Real Madrid — €1.22 billion
- Barcelona — €1.17 billion
- Chelsea — €1.11 billion
- Bayern Munich — €958 million
- Liverpool — €940 million
- Manchester United — €752 million
- Tottenham Hotspur — €700 million
- Newcastle United — €696 million
- Inter Milan — €647 million
- Nottingham Forest — €578 million
- Atlético Madrid — €577 million
- Brighton — €567 million
- Bournemouth — €566 million
- Crystal Palace — €553 million
- Aston Villa — €532 million
- Leipzig — €505 million
- Juventus — €500 million
Featured image via Getty/Franco Garland
By Alaa Shamali
The 2026 World Cup is set to enter a radically different phase in its history, following the decision to increase the number of participating teams from 32 to 48. This expansion has not only increased the number of teams but has also completely reshaped the tournament’s structure, from the group stage right through to the knockout rounds.
This change has led to an increase in the number of matches from 64 to 104, with the adoption of a completely new competition format, the biggest since the tournament’s inception.
A completely new format: 12 groups and an expanded knockout stage
In the previous format, which ran from 1998 to 2022, the tournament was organised into eight groups of four teams each, with the top two teams in each group qualifying directly for the round of 16, whilst the remaining 16 teams were eliminated.
For the 2026 World Cup, however, the number of groups has increased to 12, with four teams in each group, making the format both broader and more complex.
Under the new system, the top two teams from each group qualify directly for the round of 32, a new stage introduced to accommodate the significant expansion, bringing the total number of direct qualifiers to 24 teams.
The most significant change is that the eight best third-placed teams are given the chance to continue in the tournament by qualifying for the round of 32, bringing the total number of qualifiers for the knockout stages to 32.
Conversely, 12 teams will be eliminated immediately, namely those finishing fourth in their groups.
Criteria for determining the best third-placed teams
In the event of a tie between teams finishing third, a series of progressive criteria will be applied to determine the outcome:
First: points scored in the group stage.
Second: goal difference. Third: number of goals scored.
Fourth: fair play record.
The fair play record is based on disciplinary points as follows:
- Yellow card: 1 point
- Sending off after two yellow cards: 3 points
- Straight red card: 4 points
- Yellow card followed by a straight red card: 5 points
If the tie persists, the FIFA World Ranking is used to determine the winner.
Draw for the Round of 32
Once the 32 qualifiers have been determined, the tournament bracket is reconfigured according to a specific draw:
- The 8 group winners face the 8 third-placed teams.
- Another 4 group winners face 4 runners-up.
- The 8 runners-up also face each other in a direct knockout stage.
Final qualification table
At the end of the group stage, the places are distributed as follows:
- 12 group winners
- 12 runners-up
- 8 best third-placed teams
- 12 teams will be eliminated in the first round
This brings the number of teams qualifying for the knockout stages from 16 in the old system to 32 in the 2026 edition, ushering in a new era for the tournament that is the largest and most extensive in World Cup history.
Featured image via Getty/Orlando Ramirez
By Alaa Shamali
In what may be his strangest move yet, Tommy Robinson has released a video of himself with Elon Musk‘s father, Errol, an alleged sex offender.
Tommy Robinson is in Russia with Erroll Musk, who has been accused of sexually abusing five of his children and stepchildren. pic.twitter.com/kHKxFiVpC4
— Mukhtar (@I_amMukhtar) June 9, 2026
For clarity’s sake, we’re not saying it’s a ‘strange move’ because Errol has faced accusations of sexual abuse. After all, hanging around with alleged sex offenders is par for the course with Robinson. What’s not standard practice, however, is pissing off his wealthy backers and as we’ll get into, Elon despises his father.
Tommy Robinson and Errol Musk
Elon Musk has previously covered Robinson’s legal costs, as Robinson openly admitted. People also suspect Elon has artificially boosted Robinson’s reach on the Musk-owned X/Twitter because Robinson is all over its timeline posting suck-up posts like this:
How did I just make a full blown movie trailer with myself in it all on grok imagine 1.5
This would’ve cost 100s of thousands to produce years ago @elonmusk really doing his thing. pic.twitter.com/DYaan3LCRc — Tommy Robinson
(@TRobinsonNewEra) June 4, 2026
In the video above, Robinson says:
Enjoying my day with… This is for my ex-subscribers, Errol. Say hello to them.
Errol responds:
Hi, ex-subscribers of Tommy.
Tommy then says:
We’re gonna go and cause some trouble.
Errol retorts:
Yeah, no trouble. Doing things right.
Robinson then laughs as he says:
Trying our best to.
He likely won’t be laughing once Elon gets a look at this little love in.
The relationship between Elon and his dad
While there really is no excuse for Elon being the way he is, knowing more about his father does at least explain how we ended up with this absolute dustbin of a human being.
Elon Musk Confirms He Used Burner Account On X To Role-Play As Toddler Son https://t.co/TE6xciuk2K
— HuffPost (@HuffPost) April 8, 2024
There are ‘daddy issues’, and there’s whatever the f*ck this is. And as we said, this strange behaviour doesn’t come from nowhere.
Benzinga reported that Elon said the following about his “terrible” father:
In my experience, there is nothing you can do. Nothing, nothing. I wish. I’ve tried everything. I tried threats, rewards, intellectual arguments, emotional arguments, everything to try to change my father for the better, and he, no way, it just got worse.
Speaking on how he came to live with Errol, Elon said (summarised by the Guardian):
I felt sorry for my father, because my mother had all three kids. He seemed very sad and lonely by himself. So I thought, ‘I can be company’.
I didn’t really understand at the time what kind of person he was…It was not a good idea.
Elon isn’t the only Musk to have accused Errol of being a wretched human. A New York Times investigation revealed that Errol has faced multiple accusations of sexual abuse from family members, including:
- A stepdaughter who accused him of touching her in 1993, aged four
- The same stepdaughter accused him of sniffing her worn underwear a decade later
- Three police investigations into his behaviour
Outside of the allegations, it’s 100% confirmed that Errol fathered two children with his former stepdaughter. Oh, and Errol has also admitted to killing three men, supposedly in self-defence.
Given all this, then, it’s understandable why Elon would say:
He was such a terrible human being, you have no idea. My dad will have a carefully thought-out plan of evil. He will plan evil. Almost every crime you can possibly think of, he has done. Almost every evil thing you could possibly think of, he has done. It’s so terrible, you can’t believe it
The question is how will Elon feel about seeing his minion, Tommy Robinson, with his abuser?
Curtains for Tommy Robinson
As of right now, Elon still follows Robinson. This could change, however, because Elon is incredibly spiteful.
A good example of Elon turning on a former plaything is the case of Matt Taibbi.
Taibbi was once a well-respected investigative journalist. This changed when Elon took over Twitter, and he brought Taibbi in to curate the so-called Twitter Files — a release of internal documents exchanged between the site’s former owners.
If you’ve never heard of the ‘Twitter Files’, it’s because nothing came out which was all that surprising. As a result, many accused Taibbi of doing paid-for propaganda on behalf of a billionaire.
Things later turned sour between Elon and Taibbi because of the journalist’s relationship with Substack, a site which Elon regarded as a rival.
Since sharing links to my articles is a primary reason I come to this platform, I was alarmed and asked what was going on. I was given the option of posting articles on Twitter instead.
I’m obviously staying at Substack, and will be moving to Substack Notes next week.
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) April 7, 2023
The following messages show how things panned out:
Since @elonmusk published parts of these conversations, I might as well include others. I was under a “blanket search ban” at one point and a lot of my 1.9 million followers still don’t see my content. https://t.co/vFRtJFierF pic.twitter.com/k29MFxLUTC
— Matt Taibbi (@mtaibbi) February 15, 2024
There’s also a more recent example which exemplifies how weird and fickle Elon is.
Everything is Cheong
In late May, Musk unfollowed Ian Miles Cheong, a guy who’s made a career out of sucking up to Elon. For an example of this, see the time Cheong claimed to have “never finished GTA5” despite the fact that IT WAS HIS JOB TO PUBLISH GUIDES ON GTA 5.
Whoa! Whoa! Whoa!
You mean to tell me the game series named "Grand Theft Auto" is gonna involve doing crimes?!
Count me out, sir! — 𝕋𝕙𝕖 ℍ𝕚𝕤𝕥𝕠𝕣𝕪 𝕠𝕗 ℂ𝕙𝕚𝕟𝕒 ℙ𝕠𝕕𝕔𝕒𝕤𝕥 (@thocpodcast) December 5, 2023
Not me, Upstanding Citizen Cheong! https://t.co/tDc1NAY64n
Readers added a Community Note to this Tweet: https://t.co/yEdKu6hqQA
— Helpful Community Notes (@HelpfulNotes) December 6, 2023
The Tesla billionaire unfollowed Cheong after the man made the following observation about the mother of one of Elon’s children:
Ashley St. Claire is now trying to smash Hasan Piker. Third baby on the way, I guess. pic.twitter.com/NDBmo0zFtC
— Ian Miles Cheong (@ianmiles) May 26, 2026
It's pretty cool how some of you who act like you're friends with me are publicly gloating over Elon's decision to unfollow me. Good to know where I stand with you!
— Ian Miles Cheong (@ianmiles) May 27, 2026
As Cheong has 1.2 million followers on X, it looks like Elon may now be throttling the man’s reach.
To be clear, it’s almost certainly not the case that Musk unfollowed Cheong because he insulted the mother of his child. If we had to guess, we’d say it’s because Cheong drew attention to a conversation in which Ashley St. Claire talked at length about how weird and abusive Elon is.
St. Claire has said the following about Musk:
No one’s going to believe me, but he was so much more normal before I got pregnant. It was a very normal conversation. His demeanor was normal. I know I’m going to get roasted for this, but in private, he was funny, but then it just got so f–king weird, man.
Singer Grimes has also accused Musk of being manipulative and controlling in regards to their parental arrangements. It doesn’t end there, either, as the Atlantic reported:
Musk has an undisclosed number of children that is likely well above the 14 already publicly known, and he’s shown no obvious intention to stop sowing his seed.
But perhaps more interesting than the presence of contracts between Musk and his harem of mothers is the apparent absence of traditional family ties. He appears to acknowledge few, if any, bonds of genuine duty and responsibility among family members, much less bonds of care or love.
Musk seems to have reduced traditional family relationships to mere financial arrangements, undermining longtime conservative agreement around the importance of family.
What goes around comes around
All this is a roundabout way of noting that Elon is a weird and spiteful creature who is every bit the progeny of his father, which could be a problem for Tommy Robinson.
If he does lose Elon, though, he will still have his Zionist backers, as Lowkey exposed in the following thread and video:
Tommy Robinson has previously stated he would "fight for Israel in a war."
This thread examines Robinson and EDL's very clear material relationship with the Zionist Movement and considers the possibility that the racist attacks and pogroms in Britain are part of that fight.
— Lowkey (@Lowkey0nline) August 4, 2024
Featured image via Leon Neal/ Kevin Dietsch/ Getty Images
By Willem Moore
Christian Eriksen’s collapse during Denmark’s friendly against Ukraine sent a jolt through the Nature Energy Park crowd and brought the match to an immediate halt. What began as a routine warm‑up fixture ahead of the summer schedule turned into a moment of collective fear, one that revived memories no Danish supporter ever wanted to relive.
The 34‑year‑old midfielder went down shortly after the hour mark, appearing to clutch his chest before falling to the turf. Players reacted instantly, waving urgently for medical staff while forming a protective circle around him. The stadium, loud only minutes earlier, fell into a stunned, suspended silence.
Within minutes, the referee abandoned the match. Supporters were told the players would not return.
Eriksen reassurance from home
Hours later, the tension eased. Eriksen released a short statement confirming he was back home, recovering, and doing well. It was the message Denmark and much of the football world needed to hear.
He clarified that the incident was not a repeat of his cardiac arrest at Euro 2020. Instead, his implantable cardioverter‑defibrillator (ICD), fitted after that life‑threatening episode, had activated as designed. The device had done its job. He emphasised that he felt stable, was in good spirits, and was already focusing on rest with his family.
The tone was calm, measured, and reassuring, mirroring the way he plays on the pitch.
Echoes of Copenhagen
For many watching, the scene in Odense was painfully familiar. Eriksen’s collapse at Euro 2020 remains one of the most harrowing moments in modern football. His heart stopped on the pitch. CPR was administered. Teammates shielded him from cameras. The world held its breath.
That day changed the trajectory of his career. Italian regulations prevented him from continuing at Inter Milan with an ICD, prompting his return to the Premier League with Brentford in 2022. His performances there earned him a move to Manchester United, where he made over 100 appearances and lifted both the Carabao Cup and FA Cup before moving to Wolfsburg in 2025.
Through it all, Eriksen has been open about his recovery, his gratitude, and his determination to keep playing. Saturday’s incident was a reminder of the journey he has already travelled and the resilience that defines him.
Players’ immediate response
The reaction on the pitch was swift and emotional. Denmark captain Simon Kjær, who played a crucial role in Eriksen’s care in 2021, was among the first to call for medical assistance. Ukrainian players, visibly shaken, stepped back to allow space while joining the applause as Eriksen was taken off.
Some players were in tears. Others knelt, heads bowed. It was a moment that stripped away rivalry and left only human concern.
Medical clarity
Eriksen will undergo further tests in the coming days, but early indications suggest he avoided serious complications. His club, Wolfsburg, issued a brief statement echoing Denmark’s update and offering full support.
For now, there is no timeline on his return to training. That will come later. The priority is stability, rest, and careful monitoring.
In Denmark, the relief was palpable. Supporters who had lived through the trauma of 2021 feared the worst when Eriksen fell. The news that he was home, recovering, and in good condition brought a collective exhale.
Messages of support poured in from across Europe, teammates, former clubs, rival players, and supporters who have followed his remarkable comeback story. Eriksen has long been one of football’s most admired figures, not just for his talent but for the grace with which he has navigated adversity.
Featured Image via Stuart Franklin/Getty Images
By Faz Ali
Somalia’s top referee, Omar Abdulkadir Artan, has been dramatically ruled out of the 2026 World Cup after being denied entry to the United States, ending what would have been a landmark moment for Somali football. The 34‑year‑old, voted Africa’s best referee in 2025, was set to become the first Somali official to take charge at a men’s World Cup finals. Instead, he was forced to fly back to Istanbul after being turned away at Miami International Airport.
FIFA confirmed the decision late on Monday, acknowledging that one of Africa’s most respected officials would not be part of the tournament after US authorities refused him entry.
A dream shattered at the final checkpoint
Artan travelled to Miami believing he held the correct visa to work at the tournament. Somalia remains on the US travel‑ban list, but he had been assured he could enter under the accreditation and documentation provided for World Cup officials. That confidence evaporated the moment he landed.
According to US Customs and Border Protection, Artan was subjected to “additional inspection” upon arrival on Saturday as officers assessed whether he met the criteria for entry. After hours of checks, he was deemed “inadmissible due to vetting concerns” and denied entry.
He was placed on a return flight to Istanbul, where he had been based for refereeing assignments in recent seasons.
FIFA: ‘Host governments determine who receives a visa’
FIFA moved quickly to clarify its position, stressing that it has no authority over immigration decisions made by host nations.
A spokesperson said:
“FIFA can confirm that match official Omar Abdulkadir Artan will be unable to train and officiate at the FIFA World Cup 2026 after he was denied entry into the United States. FIFA is not involved in host country immigration processes, including visa adjudications, and has been informed by authorities that Mr Artan’s status will not be changed at present. In line with previous FIFA events, a host government ultimately determines who receives a visa and who is admitted into their country.”
The statement leaves no room for appeal. With the tournament days away, FIFA has already begun the process of replacing Artan within its refereeing pool.
A historic first that never materialised
For Somalia, Artan’s appointment was more than a personal milestone — it was a national breakthrough. No Somali referee had ever been selected for a men’s World Cup finals. His rise through African football, culminating in being named CAF Referee of the Year in 2025, had been celebrated across the continent.
His absence now leaves a glaring void.
Artan had been scheduled to join the final pre‑tournament training camp in the US, where referees undergo fitness testing, VAR calibration sessions, and match‑specific briefings. Instead, he watched his World Cup dream collapse at the airport gate.
Somali officials condemn the decision
News of the visa denial sparked immediate frustration within Somali sporting circles. Ciise Aden Abshir, an advisor to Somalia’s Ministry of Sports, told Agence France-Presse:
Omar is among Africa’s most respected referees and deserves the support of the entire football community. Denying him entry and preventing him officiating harms not only him personally but also undermines football’s commitment to fairness, merit and the spirit of fair play.
The sentiment has been echoed across Somali media, where Artan’s story had been held up as proof that Somali football could produce world‑class officials despite decades of instability at home.
A wider problem of visa complications
Artan’s case is not isolated. In recent weeks, multiple athletes, journalists, and officials from countries on US travel‑restriction lists have reported delays or denials in securing visas for the World Cup. While FIFA has insisted it is working with US authorities to streamline the process, the governing body has repeatedly emphasised that it cannot override immigration decisions.
For referees, the stakes are particularly high. Unlike players, who travel with national teams and federations, match officials must meet strict logistical and training deadlines. Missing even a few days of preparation can rule them out of the tournament entirely.
Artan’s removal underscores the fragility of that system.
A career defined by resilience
Artan’s rise through the refereeing ranks has been anything but straightforward. Born and raised in Mogadishu, he began officiating in local leagues before earning CAF recognition for his composure, fitness, and command of matches. His performances in the CAF Champions League and Africa Cup of Nations qualifiers earned him a place on FIFA’s elite list.
By 2025, he had become one of the most trusted referees on the continent, praised for his calm authority and ability to manage high‑pressure fixtures. His selection for the 2026 World Cup was widely viewed as overdue recognition.
That journey now hits an unexpected and painful halt.
What happens next for FIFA and African officiating
FIFA will now reassign Artan’s scheduled matches to other officials, likely drawing from its standby list. The Confederation of African Football (CAF) is expected to push for another African referee to be added to the roster, though time is running short.
For African officiating, Artan’s exclusion is a symbolic blow. His presence at the World Cup would have represented a step forward for Somali football and a broader statement about the continent’s refereeing depth.
Instead, the conversation has shifted to immigration policy, travel bans, and the complexities of hosting a global tournament across multiple countries with differing entry rules.
For Artan, the disappointment is profound. For Somalia, it is a missed moment of global visibility. For FIFA, it is another reminder of the corruption when tournaments intersect with geopolitics.
The World Cup will go on without him. The image of a top African referee being turned away at a US airport days before the biggest tournament of his life will linger a stark reminder that even in football, borders can still close doors that talent alone cannot open.
Featured Image via Khaled Desouki/Getty Images
By Faz Ali
After three packed days of music in some of London’s finest grassroots music venues, the inaugural edition of Bulletproof Festival has concluded.
Jeremy Corbyn’s Peace & Justice Project founded Bulletproof Festival as part of the Music For The Many campaign. It aims to support grassroots music venues, UK live music and new artists.
The inaugural edition of the festival was headlined by Maruja, SPRINTS, and Pussy Riot who performed their new production Riot Days.
There were also performances from CQ Wrestling, SNAYX, The Oozes, Currls, Cody Frost, Dead Air, Hongza, YARD, Jools, and many more. Fast-rising live band Westside Cowboy performed a secret set on the Friday night of the event.
EartH in Hackney was the main stage, with a second stage rotating between The Victoria, Shacklewell Arms and The Jago. Overall, Bulletproof Festival brought together thousands of people in support of independent venues and action to ensure the long-term sustainability of live music.
Founder of the Peace & Justice Project and Your Party leader Jeremy Corbyn addressed the crowd and introduced Maruja on the first night of the event. Corbyn said:
We have built a festival from scratch to raise the plight of Britain’s grassroots music venues. We call on the government to act to fund live music and support the next generation of artists.
We also call on the government to end its censorship of those speaking out against social injustice and the ongoing genocide in Gaza.
Bulletproof Festival’s lead organiser Samuel Sweek said:
Bulletproof was set up to show that independent music venues and community creative spaces have an absolutely invaluable role in the music industry, where the power dynamic between up-and-coming artists and small venues against the huge sponsorship deals of massive arenas, stadiums and festivals couldn’t be more stark.
We’ve shown that things can be different, things can be fairer and that the heart of British live music is still beating.
Featured image via Bekky Calver
By The Canary
4 min read
The chair of the Red Wall caucus of Labour MPs has called on ministers to keep British oil and gas in the energy mix as the government’s net zero policy comes under backbench pressure.
Jo White, the Labour MP for Bassetlaw, told PoliticsHome that North Sea reserves should be kept in the picture until the UK has shifted to homegrown green energy.
“We need an energy policy that lifts the foot off the throttle for UK growth and jobs by ensuring that the severe impacts of rising costs from imported energy are mitigated through targeted interventions, a faster shift to home-grown green energy production, and keeps UK oil and gas in the mix until that point is reached,” said White, whose caucus is made up of Labour MPs representing seats in the North and the Midlands.
The government is under pressure to take more action to protect household bills from the effects of the Iran war on global energy prices.
At the same time, questions over Keir Starmer’s future in No 10 have given rise to debates about the direction of government policy, such as the net zero agenda.
Ed Miliband, Secretary of State for Energy Security and Net Zero, is opposed to new drilling for gas and oil in the North Sea, arguing that it would not bring down energy bills as some of Labour’s political rivals claim.
However, this position is coming under pressure from within the Labour Party. Andy Burnham, who is expected to launch a bid to become prime minister if he wins the Makerfield by-election, recently said he’s got “something of an open mind” and no “fixed position”.
Earlier this week, Gary Smith, General Secretary of the Labour-supporting GMB union, compared the government’s net zero agenda to the deindustrialisation policies of Margaret Thatcher, saying it is “closing factories, hitting investment and hitting jobs”. He told Times Radio that the policy of phasing out North Sea oil and gas was “economic madness”, warning that it would result in thousands of job losses.
Luke Akehurst, Labour MP for North Durham, said the government must “listen carefully” to Smith’s intervention and take a “pragmatic” approach to energy policy.
“I do think ministers need to listen carefully to what the GMB, one of Labour’s largest affiliates, is saying about the industrial and employment impact of our energy policies, and take a pragmatic approach that safeguards well-paid, unionised jobs in the oil and gas sector,” he told PoliticsHome.
“The promised ‘green industrial revolution’ hasn’t involved enough job creation yet here in the UK. My constituents don’t get any jobs from the mass import of solar panels from China.”
Jonathan Hinder, MP for Pendle and Clitheroe, added: “Britain must be pragmatic in our energy transition. We need oil and gas, and will do so for many decades to come. It is common sense to use our own resources as much as possible, supporting jobs and tax receipts in the process, rather than relying on foreign imports.”
Last month, former Labour prime minister Tony Blair urged the government to slow down its net zero agenda and prioritise cheap energy over clean energy. He told the News Agents podcast that China’s president Xi Jinping “is not sitting there in Beijing saying: ‘I wonder what that Ed Miliband thinks it [about global energy policy]’.”
Henry Tufnell, Labour MP for Mid and South Pembrokeshire, said the government “must take stock and change course if we are to protect British Industry and the communities and livelihoods that it sustains”.
“UK energy prices that are four times more expensive than the USA and six times more expensive than Texas cannot support a competitive industrial base,” he told PoliticsHome.
In a sign of the divide within Labour, Miatta Fahnbulleh, the former energy minister who is helping Burnham build policy ahead of a bid to replace Starmer, recently told PoliticsHome that Blair was “wrong” about net zero in his intervention.
“There is a global industry that is building up around the green transition around renewables,” she said.
“China is at the absolute forefront of that. Why the hell would we not want a piece of that? Why would we not want to be on the front foot?”
Politics
ICC prosecutor suspended over alleged sexual misconduct in ‘politically motivated smear campaign’
The International Criminal Court’s (ICC) chief prosecutor Karim Khan has been suspended from his duties following an investigation into allegations of sexual misconduct. Khan has now been referred to disciplinary proceedings which will see a vote by all 125 ICC member states, with the upcoming vote set to decide his fate.
However, prior reports regarding the investigation suggested that three judges found that the evidence was not conclusive, despite a UN probe initially finding a “factual basis” for the allegations of sexual misconduct raised by a female aide.
Khan has refuted the allegations levelled against him as a “politically motivated smear campaign,” stating:
The decision is unlawful, procedurally unfair and unsupported by evidence.
As a result, fresh concerns are raised as to why this has now resulted in a member-state vote which could kick Khan out of the ICC.
Moreover, this grows particularly concerning in light of threats and sanctions imposed by Western states towards Khan and the court itself following his decision to issue arrest warrants for genocidal Israeli leaders.
BREAKING: ICC chief prosecutor Karim Khan has been suspended pending a vote by member states after a probe found he committed serious misconduct.
Khan denies the allegations and faces a possible removal vote.
— Al Jazeera Breaking News (@AJENews) June 8, 2026
More on https://t.co/5H0QqpfIYw pic.twitter.com/mmSG5phi1t
ICC: Khan denies any wrongdoing, and evidence is inconclusive
Khan will now face a vote by all 125 member states, but further disciplinary action will require at least 65 states to decide against him. Nevertheless, prior reports surrounding the allegations, which prompted Khan to take a voluntary leave of absence when first raised, suggest that there is not conclusive evidence to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the claims are valid and legitimate.
Despite that lack of evidence, the bureau – the executive committee of the court’s oversight body – has chosen to refer to a member state vote after making its own decision regarding Khan’s disciplinary proceedings. Frustratingly, the executive committee has not offered an explanation for why it chose to formally suspend Khan, despite reports from Reuters and the Associated Press that a three-judge panel selected to assess the case found that the evidence was not conclusive enough to support the allegations.
However, any faint prospect of understanding the rationale behind such a strong rebuke of the ICC prosecutor will be challenging, given that the Bureau has stated:
The decision of the Bureau and the related documentation will remain confidential.
In contrast, Khan has come under significant pressure, receiving threats and sanctions by leaders of Western states following his principled decision to issue arrest warrants for genocidal Israeli leaders, PM Benjamin Netanyahu and former minister of defence Yoav Gallant. Since charging the pair with war crimes and crimes against humanity seen in Gaza, the ICC and its prosecutor have faced widespread political pressuring to withdraw the warrants.
Defiantly, and in keeping with his stated commitment to upholding international law, Khan has stood by his position and resisted attempts by pro-Zionist governments and political actors in the West to pressure him into silence.
ICC prosecutor Karim Khan remains defiant and set on justice for victims of genocide, as US sustain sanctions on him and his family
By @MaddisonW92 https://t.co/xF9OGt5Hlu — Canary (@TheCanaryUK) June 3, 2026
Sanctions and threats from Western pro-Zionist leaders
Khan has condemned the decision taken as a politically motivated smear campaign. A majority of 21 diplomats sitting on the executive committee recommended the finding of ‘serious misconduct’ despite three judges finding no real evidence of wrongdoing. Given the lack of evidence and the strong position taken by this executive body, the suggestion of sinister political motivations being at play is hard to discount.
After all, we know that then-foreign secretary David Cameron threatened Khan in an attempt to intimidate him into refraining from issuing arrest warrants, saying that the UK would withdraw from the ICC if he didn’t. Khan did not back down, and we are still a member of the ICC – but resistance to holding Israel accountable for its flagrant war crimes, abuses, and crimes against humanity is still going strong as the UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office (FCDO) ‘lost’ all recorded evidence of Israel’s crimes.
Furthermore, and likely relevant to his subsequent character assassination, a British-Israeli lawyer acting on Netanyahu’s behalf reportedly warned Khan in May 2025 that, unless the ICC abandoned the case against the Zionist, genocidal leader, they would “destroy” both the prosecutor and the court itself. Such a warning is surely designed not merely to influence a legal proceeding, but to intimidate the very institution charged with upholding international law.
This state-led intimidation should be illegal
The law rightly treats the intimidation of jurors as a serious offence because it undermines the integrity of the judicial process. In the same way, attempts to pressure or coerce an international court and its officials should bring equal criminality. But that principle only holds if Western leaders are, in practice, prepared to defend the rule of law consistently and without fear or favour.
Nonetheless, this principled, moral leadership certainly won’t come from the US. We wrote recently about Khan’s dogged resistance to the US’ abusive, maligned pressure – which saw unfair, and arguably illegal, sanctions applied against himself and his children by US President Trump:
Khan opened up about the coercive agenda at play to intimidate him as he pursues justice and accountability for the tens of thousands of victims of flagrant war crimes and crimes against humanity.
In response, Khan defiantly centered those who have lost everything as a result of imperialist aggression, saying:
“.. it’s not about us. It’s about victims and their right to justice.
They’re not worthless. They’re not numbers. They’re not abstract concepts.
They’re people that have lost their babies, their wives, their husbands, their grandparents.”
Sanctions didn’t work – now they’re weaponising disciplinary processes
Therefore, Khan argues that this may be yet another attempt at intimidation and silencing by the powers he believes dominate the West—Israel and its closely aligned allies in the United States and the United Kingdom.
Regardless of the cynical and potentially subversive agenda that may be driving these actions against him, the member states will ultimately decide any further steps through a vote. International law must matter. Without it, the world risks descending into barbarism, where the most powerful actors remain untouchable and can act with complete impunity. In such a status quo, no one can truly be safe.
Featured image via Getty/Michael M. Santiago
Keir Starmer has launched the latest crap policy that he thinks will save his failing premiership: an AI jobcentre advisor – because that’s exactly what the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) need.
DWP and AI needs to walk the plank
The Prime Minister announced at London Tech Week that the DWP had developed the new ‘AI work assistant’. Starmer called the tool a ‘jobcentre in your pocket’ and said it would help unemployed people find work and help build them CVs.
Science editor at The Times, Tom Whipple decided to give it a go, with a twist.
He wrote on Twitter:
I tried the government’s new AI “Jobcentre in your pocket” chatbot. Could it write me a CV? It could.
It also suggested that I should consider employment law and whether I’ve been discriminated against.
Key detail: I’m a parrot.
As Whipple wrote, he asked the robot to ask him to not help him, but Long John Silver’s faithful parrot from Treasure Island.
The journalist details that the AI told him repeating a phrase over and over (‘pieces of eight’) wasn’t an issue. This simply made him an expert in verbal communications. The parrot didn’t just sit on Long John Silver’s shoulder cracking wise, he was responsible for ‘supporting senior figures in client-facing work’.
The AI did flag up that the parrot (real name Captain Flint, according to the book) did have one issue, a significant gap in employment. But that tends to happen when the book you’re in was written in the 18th century, doesn’t it?
Despite the ridiculousness, the AI did produce a CV for the parrot, it even included a glowing endorsement from his previous employer:
Who’s a pretty boy, then?
-Former employer, Maritime industry
Let’s be clear, whilst this was hilarious, it was a rather smug middle-class approach. All this really proves is that the AI is indeed a robot that can’t identify context clues and so set on its directive, it won’t deviate from it. This side-quest of Whipple’s doesn’t really drill down into how sinister using AI to push someone into work is.
What will the AI force disabled people into?
As the Canary’s Hannah Sharland has previously reported, the DWP has previously funnelled £1.5 million into AI companies. As Sharland explained, the department is weaponising AI against disabled people to force them into work:
What we have is AI spying on sick people in work, and AI spying on sick people not in work. Ultimately, this new DWP AI guff is just the government’s latest dodgy gambit to bring sick and disabled people under the thumb of the exploitative capitalist market.
It’s especially hypocritical that the department continues to use AI when it previously demonised disabled benefits claimants for using AI to complete needlessly traumatic and long PIP forms.
Back in March, the I paper ran with:
‘Dangerous’ over-dependence on AI tools leaves disabled people using wrong or irrelevant information on their forms, say benefits advisers.
The real story here was that the DWP was refusing to release PIP assessor training manuals, but the department covered that up by claiming that they could be fed into AI. And while they don’t want people using AI to fill in the forms, they use AI to make benefits decisions. This is despite findings that AI use is much more likely to target vulnerable claimants.
The DWP has designed an AI that will manipulate people into work no matter what. Sure, in this case it’s a fictional parrot, but what happens when a disabled person who would desperately need support at work starts talking to it, will the machine pinpoint this safeguarding issue? Or will it twist the claimant’s words and massage them to make them more desirable to employers?
Whilst disabled people are being forced into employment without the support they need, a tool like this is dangerous and just another way the DWP will make disabled people’s lives harder.
Featured image via Getty/Justin Sullivan
STOP: The New 1% of XRP…
Hayling care home residents celebrate D-Day
Strait of Hormuz is the factor affecting all energy markets, VP says
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread: Evereve – Corporette.com
-
Crypto World4 days agoJensen Huang Approves Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron for NVIDIA (NVDA) HBM4 Memory Supply
-
Sports7 days agoFrench Open 2026 results: Alexander Zverev beats Rafael Jodar and will play Jakub Mensik in semi-finals
-
Business7 days agoTrump Taps Housing Chief Bill Pulte as Acting Intelligence Director After Gabbard Exit
-
Crypto World1 day agoAnatomy of the June crypto crash: Fed, Iran, Saylor
-
NewsBeat7 days agoRepublicans balk at Trump’s attempt to appoint a MAGA enforcer to lead National Intelligence
-
Crypto World3 days agoSenator Cynthia Lummis Calls CLARITY Act the Most Consequential Financial Legislation of This Generation
-
Business3 days agoThe Pain Points Taking a Fragile Tech Rally Down a Notch
-
Entertainment3 days agoThe Best Mystery Series of All Time Is Surging on Streaming 30 Years After It Ended
-
Tech2 days agoMicrosoft unveils seven homegrown AI models in new bid for ‘long term self-sufficiency’
-
Tech4 days agoMicrosoft launches MXC, an OS-level sandbox for AI agents, with OpenAI and Nvidia already on board
-
NewsBeat2 days agoAlexander Zverev wins the French Open to finally earn a 1st Grand Slam title
-
Crypto World4 days ago
LBank Surpasses 25 Million Users Worldwide as AFA Partnership Continues to Drive Global Growth
-
Business7 days agoPagerDuty, Inc. (PD) Presents at Bank of America 2026 Global Technology Conference Transcript
-
Tech4 days agoSuspicious Polyfill login prompts pop up on Toshiba, Muji websites
-
Crypto World2 days agoTrump’s AI Ownership Plan Could Benefit Anthropic at OpenAI’s Expense
-
Business4 days ago(VIDEO) Justin Bieber Delivers Surprise Happy Birthday Serenade to Diners at Los Angeles Mexican Restaurant
-
Tech4 days agoMeta steals a tactic from Tesla and builds data centers in tents
-
Tech4 days agoRCS Messages Between iPhone and Android Get End-to-End Encryption With iOS 26.5
-
Business7 days ago
Asia stocks rise past US-Iran jitters; Nikkei hits record high on stimulus cheer
You must be logged in to post a comment Login