Connect with us

Business

CD&R beats rivals in pursuit of €15.5bn Sanofi consumer health unit

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

An offer from US private equity firm Clayton, Dubilier & Rice has beaten rivals, pursuing French pharmaceutical company Sanofi’s consumer healthcare division, in what is set to be the largest European healthcare deal this year, according to five people with direct knowledge of the process.

The American group on Thursday edged out a submission from a consortium led by French private equity firm PAI as it nears a deal with the French seller. Negotiations between Sanofi and CD&R will now continue, the people said. A deal could be reached within days but is not yet finalised.

Advertisement

CD&R’s offer values the business, which makes over-the-counter pain management and allergy medications, such as Doliprane and Allegra, at €15.5bn. Sanofi would keep a stake of about 50 per cent in the business with a view to selling it in the next few years, the people said.

Sanofi did not immediately respond to a request for comment. CD&R and PAI declined to comment. The offer was first reported by French newspaper Les Echos.

A transaction would be the latest of several sales of consumer divisions by pharmaceutical companies, as large groups in the sector seek to dispose of steady but low-earning businesses to focus their resources on the riskier but more lucrative field of drug development.

Sanofi has been exploring options for a sale or a potential float since it announced plans to separate the division a year ago. The Opella consumer division accounts for a tenth of the group’s total sales.

Advertisement

Chief executive Paul Hudson told the Financial Times last year that a future as a publicly listed entity was “the most likely path” for the division, but Sanofi seems to now be moving towards a private equity-led takeover.

In 2021, GSK and Pfizer listed their joint-venture consumer healthcare business Haleon in London, while Johnson & Johnson of the US separated off its consumer company Kenvue in 2022.

In keeping a large stake in Opella, Sanofi would seek to benefit from the reliable earnings it offers. GSK and Pfizer also both maintained large stakes in Haleon on listing, which they have since sold down.

Hudson will now focus on improving the company’s research and development output. The executive took investors by surprise last October when he decided to scrap Sanofi’s margin target for 2025 and unveiled plans to spend an additional €2bn on research in 2024 and 2025, leading to a 19 per cent hit to the company’s share price.

Advertisement

Sanofi is heavily reliant on income from its blockbuster asthma and allergy treatment Dupixent; developed by US drugmaker Regeneron, the drug accounted for almost a quarter of sales in 2023, but will lose patent protection around 2031.

Hudson has outlined 12 potential blockbuster candidates to shareholders in a bid to convince them that he can deliver on the company’s R&D ambitions.

Reporting by Ian Johnston, Adrienne Klasa, Ivan Levingston, Oliver Barnes and Alexandra Heal

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Bit of blue sky thinking on Nato’s common defence

Published

on

Banker all-nighters create productivity paradox

Making Europe safe for democracy will take much more than just maintaining Nato country defence budgets at 2 per cent of GDP, according to the organisation’s outgoing secretary-general Jens Stoltenberg (“So far, we have called Putin’s bluff”, Lunch with FT, Life & Arts, October 5).

Probably. But wouldn’t it be possible to improve the organisation’s weapons, capabilities and troops if the national defence forces of each country were put under one command?

Maybe we could start with the Nordic countries. Why do they each have their national defence forces and not one common defence force? Are they afraid of a future conflict and possible war with each other?

Jan Erik Grindheim
Professor, University of South-Eastern Norway; and Afflliate, Civita Think Tank (Oslo), Notodden, Norway

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Ministers have to mitigate effects of renters’ rights bill

Published

on

Banker all-nighters create productivity paradox

The renters’ rights bill, which passed its second reading in the House of Commons this week, is set to be the biggest change to the private rented sector in England for over 30 years with proposed changes to ban Section 21 evictions, the introduction of open-ended tenancies and new requirements for property standards and rent increases (Report, September 12).

Propertymark is the UK’s leading membership body for property agents. While we want to see improved standards, the government must fully understand the impact these changes will have, with agents left wondering how this legislation will help meet the much-needed demand for homes for people to rent.

Our monthly Housing Insight Report shows on average eight registrations for each available property with fewer new properties coming on to the market. The bill in its current form is highly likely to exacerbate this situation with more landlords withdrawing homes from the private rented sector, frequently moving them to short-term lets.

Tax is reducing the investment appetite of new and existing landlords with higher rates of stamp duty on buy-to-let properties and the withdrawal of tax relief on mortgage interest costs. Ministers must recognise the financial implications of this bill and the impact it has on the supply of homes to rent.

Advertisement

Through the renters’ rights bill, the UK government must commit to reviewing all costs and taxes impacting on private landlords to ensure landlords continue in the market and more landlords can meet the demand for homes to rent.

Additionally, with no security of a rental term for a landlord beyond the proposed two months’ notice period and no long-term guarantee of rent, we would expect to see a significant number of landlords attracted to higher rents in the short-term letting market, which also offers them the advantage of being unregulated.

With landlords exiting the private rented sector, the result would be a reduction in the rental stock available for long-term tenants and increased rents. To help mitigate this, the government must also enact the registration of short-term rental property requirements, as passed in the Levelling-up and Regeneration Act 2023, alongside these reforms to level the playing field for landlords and the long-term rental market.

Timothy Douglas
Head of Policy and Campaigns, Propertymark, Warwick, UK

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Travel

Business travel expected to surpass pre-pandemic levels this year

Published

on

Business travel expected to surpass pre-pandemic levels this year

A new report by the World Travel & Tourism Council forecasts that global business travel will reach a record US$1.5 trillion in 2024

Continue reading Business travel expected to surpass pre-pandemic levels this year at Business Traveller.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Indian’s mocking quip on that imperial sunset clause

Published

on

Your report (October 4) that giving the Chagos Islands to Mauritius means the sun has finally set on the British empire reminds me of a comment by Krishna Menon, a defence minister in post-independence India. The British empire had reached its zenith on September 29, 1923 having acquired enormous amount of territories following the first world war. It then covered nearly 14mn square miles, 150 times the size of Great Britain. This was a quarter of the world’s land area with 460mn people, a fifth of the world’s population. George V, as King Emperor, could proudly claim that the sun never set on the British empire.

This prompted Menon, then based in London campaigning for India’s freedom, to mockingly say: “The sun never set on the empire because God doesn’t trust the British in the dark.” Now the sun has set on the empire the British will surely regain God’s trust.

Mihir Bose
London W6, UK

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Ordering foreign books in Japan is a postcode lottery

Published

on

Why are western — normally American, but in this case British — computer programmers so arrogant as to insist that the rest of the world conform to their organisation (“AI start-ups make money faster than software groups of the past”, Report, September 28)?

I wanted to buy a couple of books by the brilliant and eloquent theologian Father Timothy Radcliffe OP, soon to be Cardinal Radcliffe, an eminent eminence indeed. Bloomsbury publishes the books. Unfortunately, my address takes the form of 3-2-1-1111, Osaka 543-2100. It makes twisted sense in Japan where few of the higgledy-piggledy streets and lanes have names. However, Bloomsbury’s computer insists on rendering my address as 3211111 Osaka 5432100 without allowing any hyphens or even commas — which code I doubt even Bloomsbury’s computers would be able to fathom.

Postcodes in Japan are not as precise as in the UK, and the same code may cover several hundred urban metres. There are ways round, by writing Chōme (city district name), Banchi (block), Gō (house number) and apartment, preceded by the number for each, but this is clumsy, and Japan prefers Chōme etc with hyphens; and I do not know whether my credit card or bank would recognise the address thus rendered. I fear that Global Britain may be lost in foreign lanes where customs are different.

Kevin Rafferty
Osaka, Japan

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

How Xi’s crackdown turned China’s finance high-flyers into ‘rats’

Published

on

How Xi’s crackdown turned China’s finance high-flyers into ‘rats’
Getty Images Businessman against Chinese flag in double exposure.Getty Images

China has cracked down on businesses including real estate, technology and finance

“Now I think about it, I definitely chose the wrong industry.”

Xiao Chen*, who works in a private equity firm in China’s financial hub, Shanghai, says he is having a rough year.

For his first year in the job, he says he was paid almost 750,000 yuan ($106,200; £81,200). He was sure he would soon hit the million-yuan mark.

Three years on, he is earning half of what he made back then. His pay was frozen last year, and an annual bonus, which had been a big part of his income, vanished.

Advertisement

The “glow” of the industry has worn off, he says. It had once made him “feel fancy”. Now, he is just a “finance rat”, as he and his peers are mockingly called online.

China’s once-thriving economy, which encouraged aspiration, is now sluggish. The country’s leader, Xi Jinping, has become wary of personal wealth and the challenges of widening inequality.

Crackdowns on billionaires and businesses, from real estate to technology to finance, have been accompanied by socialist-style messaging on enduring hardship and striving for China’s prosperity. Even celebrities have been told to show off less online.

Loyalty to the Communist Party and country, people are told, now trumps the personal ambition that had transformed Chinese society in the last few decades.

Advertisement

Mr Chen’s swanky lifestyle has certainly felt the pinch from this U-turn. He traded a holiday in Europe for a cheaper option: South East Asia. And he says he “wouldn’t even think about” buying again from luxury brands like “Burberry or Louis Vuitton”.

But at least ordinary workers like him are less likely to find themselves in trouble with the law. Dozens of finance officials and banking bosses have been detained, including the former chairman of the Bank of China.

The industry is under pressure. While few companies have publicly admitted it, pay cuts in banking and investment firms are a hot topic on Chinese social media.

Posts about falling salaries have generated millions of views in recent months. And hashtags like “changing career from finance” and “quitting finance” have gained more than two million views on the popular social media platform Xiaohongshu.

Advertisement

Some finance workers have been seeing their income shrink since the start of the pandemic but many see one viral social media post as a turning point.

In July 2022, a Xiaohongshu user sparked outrage after boasting about her 29-year-old husband’s 82,500-yuan monthly pay at top financial services company, China International Capital Corporation.

People were stunned by the huge gap between what a finance worker was getting paid and their own wages. The average monthly salary in the country’s richest city, Shanghai, was just over 12,000 yuan.

It reignited a debate about incomes in the industry that had been started by another salary-flaunting online user earlier that year.

Advertisement

Those posts came just months after Xi called for “common prosperity” – a policy to narrow the growing wealth gap.

In August 2022, China’s finance ministry published new rules requiring firms to “optimise the internal income distribution and scientifically design the salary system”.

The following year, the country’s top corruption watchdog criticised the ideas of “finance elites” and the “only money matters” approach, making finance a clearer target for the country’s ongoing anti-corruption campaign.

Getty Images Shanghai skyline.Getty Images

Shanghai is a financial hub and China’s richest city

The changes came in a sweeping but discreet way, according to Alex*, a manager at a state-controlled bank in China’s capital, Beijing.

Advertisement

“You would not see the order put into written words – even if there is [an official] document it’s certainly not for people on our level to see. But everyone knows there is a cap on it [salaries] now. We just don’t know how much the cap is.”

Alex says employers are also struggling to deal with the pace of the crackdown: “In many banks, the orders could change unexpectedly fast.”

“They would issue the annual guidance in February, and by June or July, they would realise that the payment of salaries has exceeded the requirement. They then would come up with ways to set up performance goals to deduct people’s pay.”

Mr Chen says his workload has shrunk significantly as the number of companies launching shares on the stock market has fallen. Foreign investment has decreased in China, and domestic businesses have also turned cautious – because of the crackdowns and weak consumption.

Advertisement

In the past his work often involved new projects that would bring money into his firm. Now his days are mostly filled with chores like organising the data from his previous projects.

“The morale of the team has been very low, the discussion behind the bosses backs are mostly negative. People are talking what to do in three to five years.”

It’s hard to estimate if people are leaving the industry in large numbers, although there have been some layoffs. Jobs are also scarce in China now, so even a lower-paying finance job is still worth keeping.

But the frustration is evident. A user on Xiaohongshu compared switching jobs to changing seats – except, he wrote, “if you stand up you might find your seat is gone.”

Advertisement

Mr Chen says that it’s not just the authorities that have fallen out of love with finance workers, it’s Chinese society in general.

“We are no longer wanted even for a blind date. You would be told not to go once they hear you work in finance.”

*The names of the finance workers have been changed to protect their identities.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com