Connect with us

News

News diary 18-20 October: UK investment summit, Lammy visits China, Novichok inquiry begins

Published

on

News diary 18-20 October: UK investment summit, Lammy visits China, Novichok inquiry begins

A look ahead at the key events leading the news agenda next week, from the team at Foresight News.

Leading the week

Keir Starmer will be hoping to turn attention away from the Labour Party’s recent dramas and on to his priorities for government when he hosts a major investment summit in London on Monday (October 14). The summit comes after the unveiling of Labour’s new employment rights bill (and the timely appointment of a new minister for investment), and will mark an attempt by the party to tout its pro-business credentials after a less than enthusiastic response in some quarters to its plans to improve workers’ rights, all with one eye on the prime minister’s mission to deliver higher living standards by boosting growth.

With the backing of big UK banks and an impressive roster of attendees, including former Google CEO Eric Schmidt, the summit is an opportunity for the government to garner some positive headlines: a few post-summit announcements on investments from big-name firms will be a welcome antidote to the cycle of bad news in recent weeks. And the blow of missing out on some of Elon Musk’s on-stage antics will reportedly be softened by the presence of former England manager and quarter-zip icon Gareth Southgate, who could also offer some tips on how to achieve longevity in the toughest job in the country.

The long-awaited inquiry into the Novichok poisoning death of Dawn Sturgess opens on Monday (October 14) in Salisbury. Sturgess, 44, came into contact with the poison after mistaking it for a bottle of perfume in July 2018. The first week of the inquiry hears from Sturgess’ family, as well as members of the emergency response team who treated her in Amesbury. Previous hearings have described ‘astonishing observations’ that will be heard during the inquiry, with its broadcast being delayed by 15 minutes in case anyone accidentally compromises national security.

Two people who will not be appearing at the inquiry, though, are Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia. The pair were targeted in a Novichok poisoning months earlier, when the nerve agent was smeared on their door handle in what is widely believed to be a Russian assassination attempt, but both survived. Though Sturgess’ death is believed to be linked to the attack on the Skripals, inquiry chair Lord Hughes ruled that there was an ‘overwhelming risk’ of a second attack on the family if the Skripals or their location could be identified. Evidence related to the Skripals’ poisoning is scheduled to be heard later this month.

Advertisement


King Charles undertakes his most significant trip since beginning treatment for cancer when he travels to Australia on Friday (October 18) for a tour that runs through to October 23 and is followed by a State Visit to Samoa and a first Commonwealth Heads of Government Meeting as monarch. The King is reportedly due to pause his treatment for the duration of the visit, which begins in Canberra with a welcome from Prime Minister Anthony Albanese at Parliament House and features a busy schedule of solo engagements and high-profile joint events with Queen Camilla.

Content from our partners
Advertisement

Highlights for the trip include a wreath laying at the Australian War Memorial, a visit to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander memorial and a review of Royal Australian Navy in Sydney Harbour. The King will also get to engage with issues close to his heart with climate and sustainability-related visits, but the most significant part of the trip may be a meeting with Australian cancer experts Professor Georgina Long and Professor Richard Scolyer to hear about the pair’s work on melanoma treatment.

Looking abroad

David Lammy has spent the first months of his tenure as Foreign Secretary putting in an impressive amount of shoe-leather diplomacy, with trips to the United States and European capitals taking place in between travel to conflict hotspots in Ukraine and the Middle East. But Lammy’s most difficult visit yet could come during next week’s planned jaunt to China, which will be closely watched for indications of how the new Labour government plans to handle its relationship with Xi Jinping and the Chinese leadership.

In opposition Lammy held strong views about Beijing’s treatment of the Uyghurs in Xinjiang, and there will be many in Parliament – not least those MPs who remain sanctioned by the Chinese government – who will be keen to see the foreign secretary maintain a tough approach during his visit. A July meeting with top diplomat Wang Yi produced only a tepid call for stability and closer communication, meaning Lammy is under pressure to raise the thornier issues (human rights, the release of British citizen Jimmy Lai, and ties with Russia and Iran, to name a few) in his latest diplomatic expedition.

Before heading to Beijing, Lammy will be in Luxembourg on Monday (October 14) to join EU foreign ministers as part of the latest step in resetting UK-EU relations. The conflicts in the Middle East and Ukraine are both on the agenda as the wars look set to once again dominate the international news agenda next week. Ukraine’s new foreign minister Andrii Sybiha will also take part in the meeting, though in his case his participation will be virtual. On Wednesday (October 16), the first-ever EU-Gulf Cooperation Council summit will be held in Brussels, which will see leaders from Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia and the UAE join European counterparts for talks likely to be overshadowed by Israeli military action in the Middle East, including its anticipated response to Iran’s decision to fire a barrage of missiles over Israel on October 1. A two-day EU summit then follows on Thursday and Friday (October 17-18).

Advertisement

New NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte will oversee his first ministerial meeting of alliance counterparts when defence ministers travel to Brussels on Thursday and Friday (October 17-18) joined, for the first time, by ministers from South Korea, Japan, Australia and New Zealand. The gathering will likely also include a meeting of the US-chaired Ukraine Contact Group after the leaders’ summit planned for this weekend was cancelled was cancelled when US President Joe Biden opted to stay home to deal with Hurricane Milton. Defence Secretary John Healey is then scheduled to head to Naples where, on Saturday (October 19), Italy is hosting the first-ever G7 defence ministers’ meeting, where the agenda – you guessed it – includes the situation in the Middle East and conflict in Ukraine. On Sunday (October 20), Healey is set to participate in a trilateral session with his Italian and Japanese counterparts, Guido Crosetto and Gen Nakatani.

Also look out for…

October 14

  • MOD Qs and terrorism protection bill in the Commons
  • EAT hearing in Benjamin Mendy case against Man City over unpaid wages
  • Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences (Nobel)
  • UN Security Council discusses Lebanon
  • Kamala Harris holds rally in Pennsylvania
  • Nancy Pelosi in conversation at Chatham House
  • Shia LaBeouf trial opens over FKA twigs abuse allegations

October 15

  • Horizon IT director at Post Office inquiry
  • UK labour market statistics
  • Hereditary Peers Bill in the Commons
  • Energy Crisis Commission publishes findings
  • Andrew Tate appeal court hearing in Romania
  • Pakistan hosts Shanghai Cooperation Organization summit
  • Bob Woodward’s book War published
  • Combined Exhibition of Advanced Technologies (CEATEC) opens

October 16

  • PMQs
  • Assisted dying bill introduced in the Commons
  • September inflation figures (uprating increases)
  • Porthmadog crash inquests
  • Stormzy on trial charged with using phone while driving
  • Donald Trump’s Univision town hall airs
  • EU Enlargement Package presented
  • Hong Kong Chief Executive delivers annual policy address
  • RIBA Stirling Prize Awards
  • Jewish holiday of Sukkot begins

October 17

  • Robert Jenrick and Kemi Badenoch participate in GB News debate
  • FCA and PRA chiefs address City Banquet
  • David Carrick in court charged with sex offences
  • Premier League holds official clubs meeting
  • Donald Trump speaks at Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner
  • Opening statements expected in Delphi double murder trial
  • Kristalina Georgieva makes IMF annual meetings curtain-raiser speech

October 18

  • UK retail sales figures
  • Sentencing of teen found guilty of Blundell’s school attack
  • First bids deadline for The Hundred

October 19

  • Elections in British Columbia (Canada) and Australian Capital Territory
  • QIPCO British Champions Series Champions Day
  • Francis Ngannou returns at PFL Saudi Arabia
  • Paul Mescal and Quentin Tarantino honoured at Academy Museum of Motion Pictures gala

October 20

  • Moldova presidential election and EU referendum
  • Parliamentary elections in Iraqi Kurdistan
  • Final report due from Kolkata rape case task force
  • Formula One: United States Grand Prix
  • NFL London Fixture: Patriots v Jaguars

Statistics, reports and results

October 14

  • OPEC monthly oil markets report
  • OBR Budget forecast round
  • Savanta UK grocery trends survey

October 15

  • Universal Credit statistics
  • Register of Political Donations
  • IEA monthly oil market report
  • Amnesty report on human rights in the EV industry
  • Greenpeace report on National Renewal Tax
  • Results from: Goldman Sachs, Bank of America, Citigroup, Johnson & Johnson, Ericsson, UnitedHealth Group, Walgreens Boots Alliance, Reach

October 16

  • IEA World Energy Outlook
  • NAO report on achieving Net Zero
  • Private rent and house price statistics
  • UK Producer Price Inflation
  • Freedom on the Net 2024
  • Chatham House paper on the war in Ukraine
  • Bayes Business School report on commercial real estate lending
  • Results from: ASML, Whitbread, Just Eat Takeaway.com, Alcoa, Morgan Stanley

October 17

  • Family Food Survey 2023
  • Smoking, drinking and drug use in young people in England (2023)
  • Quarterly CPS performance stats
  • EU inflation
  • UNCTAD Trade and Development Report
  • Savanta European consumer confidence survey
  • Results from: Netflix, TSMC and Nokia

October 18

  • China GDP and economic data press conference
  • Overseas Travel & Tourism Survey
  • Results from: Procter and Gamble, American Express

Anniversaries and awareness days

October 14

  • Columbus Day
  • Canadian Thanksgiving
  • National Dessert Day
  • UK Coffee Week (to October 20)
  • Recycle Week (to October 20)
  • European Local Democracy Week (to October 20)
  • 30 years ago: Rabin and Arafat awarded Nobel Peace Prize

October 15

  • Three years ago: Sir David Amess MP killed
  • Global Handwashing Day

October 16

  • World Food Day
  • Restart a Heart Day
  • National Dictionary Day
  • Boss’s Day
  • Seven years ago: Daphne Caruana Galizia killed

October 17

  • International Day for the Eradication of Poverty
  • Harry Potter Book Day
  • National Pasta Day
  • International Credit Union Day

October 18

  • Wear It Pink Day
  • World Menopause Day
  • EU Anti-Trafficking Day
  • Anti-Slavery Day

October 19

October 20

  • World Mission Sunday
  • World Osteoporosis Day

The news diary is provided in association with Foresight News.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our “Letters Page” blog

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

News

The Ending of ‘We Live in Time’ May Destroy You

Published

on

The Ending of 'We Live in Time' May Destroy You

Warning: This post contains spoilers for We Live in Time.

We Live in Time ends like it begins—with one crucial difference. Eggs just collected from the coop are being cracked into glass bowls on their way to becoming breakfast. Only this time, instead of a woman named Almut cooking for her sleeping partner Tobias, it’s Tobias cooking with their daughter, Ella. He teaches the young pupil how to crack the eggs on a flat surface just as Almut, a celebrated chef, taught him during an early date. Another key difference: an adorably scruffy dog stands at their feet. It’s a callback to a conversation the couple had, after learning that Almut’s ovarian cancer had recurred and was incurable, about how dogs can help children heal from loss. 

It’s a poignant bookend that speaks to the ways we keep our loved ones with us even after they’re gone. Almut had been terrified that she’d be forgotten, or that her kid would think of her as nothing more than a dead mom. The scene telegraphs Tobias’ commitment to showing Ella that her mom had a life outside of their world. 

But it’s the penultimate scene that begs further dissection. And it’s one that a lot of people might be about to dissect as We Live in Time begins to play in theaters on Oct. 11: Since the movie’s premiere at the Toronto International Film Festival in September, the A24 weepie from Brooklyn director John Crowley has garnered mostly positive reviews. In a cinematic landscape that has seen movies aimed largely at female audiences racking up box-office wins, and with a beloved and respected leading duo in Florence Pugh and Andrew Garfield, it’s clear that the appetite for a tear-jerking romance has hardly waned in the half century since Ryan O’Neal held Ali MacGraw on her deathbed in Love Story.

Advertisement

Read more: We Live in Time Asks Too Much of Us

But unlike that iconic film, We Live in Time does not take us to Almut’s death bed. It handles her death metaphorically, clearly alluding to it while keeping her final breaths offscreen and leaving the flatlining monitors to the imagination. It’s hardly novel in doing so—in fact, it harkens back to a long tradition of off-screen expirations, particularly in romantic and family dramas. And, perhaps counterintuitively, this figurative approach ends up being more sob-worthy than its more literal alternative.

We Live in Time
Grace Delaney, Andrew Garfield, and Florence Pugh in We Live in TimeCourtesy of A24

In this scene, Pugh’s Almut, now quite ill, is in Italy for a major European cooking competition when she comes upon an ice skating rink. It’s a made-for-the-movies coincidence: Al had been a competitive skater as a teenager until the death of her skating-enthusiast dad made it too painful to continue. After completing a recipe, she abruptly walks off the competition floor—taking off her chef’s hat like she knows it’s for the last time, because it is, walking up to her family in the stands, moving toward a glowing light that signifies the impending peaceful transition to the other side—we cut to their little family at the rink. She’s demonstrating her skills for the novice Ella (Grace Delaney), as Tobias looks on proudly. Then we see her on the opposite side of the rink. Dad and daughter wave to mom from afar, and she waves back, smiling beatifically. They are saying goodbye. There is a sense of acceptance. No one is sobbing. The scene ends, and we understand in a figurative sense that she is dead.

One one level, this is the stuff of extreme cheese. It left me rolling my eyes even as tears trickled out of them. And yet, on another: thank the lord almighty for sparing us from having to watch Al’s jagged last breath, taken between hollowed-out cheeks and Hollywood’s best not-quite-a-corpse makeup—and having to watch her loved ones watch it happen. We are even spared the immediate aftermath: the coffin being lowered into the earth, the child alone in a corner while well wishers three heads taller schmooze and nosh, the widower donating sweaters to Goodwill.

The movie has, until this point, been rather forthright about the pain of advanced cancer and the treatment that ravages a body in trying to stave off death. Hair loss, nausea, exhaustion, bruising, random bloody noses, the interruption to intimacy. It’s all so awful that Almut considers forgoing treatment altogether so that she can try to really live for six months rather than suffer for 12. It’s about the indignities, too. In one scene, she looks on as another chemo patient nods off to sleep during an infusion, her red wig moving out of place as her head falls toward her shoulder. A nurse comes by and tenderly moves it back into place: the woman doesn’t need to be embarrassed on top of everything else, the nurse knows; her job goes beyond the purely physical.

Advertisement

But We Live in Time stops short of bearing witness to death. It’s in good company in screenwriter Nick Payne’s choice to opt for metaphorical subtlety, especially when it comes to young moms and cancer. Any millennial pop-culture enthusiast worth their salt sobbed over the ending of Stepmom (1998), when Susan Sarandon’s dying mother insists on taking a family photo that includes the young stepmother (Julia Roberts) she’s given grief to throughout the movie. The two women hold hands as the Nikon flashes, “Ain’t No Mountain High Enough” prompts the viewer to cry and smile simultaneously and the photo fades to black, signifying her death, the family moving on but holding her memory dear. In the 1988 tear duct obliterator Beaches, Barbara Hershey’s Hillary sits in an Adirondack chair in the salty air. She hugs her young daughter then returns to watching a yellow sun sink against a mauve sky. Her BFF C.C. (Bette Midler) smiles in her direction, “The Wind Beneath My Wings” triggers the lacrimal glands, and someone literally rides off into the sunset on a white horse. Cut to black funeral limos. In Spike Lee’s Crooklyn (1994), we see Alfre Woodard’s Carolyn weak in a hospital bed receiving her final farewell kisses from daughter Troy (Zelda Harris) shortly before we see Troy in her PJs, refusing to dress for the funeral.

Other films take the tack of film-it-or-it-didn’t-happen. Terms of Endearment (1983) shows us the death of Debra Winger’s cancer-stricken but still very pretty mother of three: her hand falls limp beside her hospital bed, the camera panning up to the faces of her mother (Shirley MacLaine) and estranged husband (Jeff Daniels), taking in the loss. In 2016’s Other People, Molly Shannon’s matriarch dies 49 seconds into the movie—the screen is black and we can only hear the sounds of her family members, pig-piled on the bed around her, sobbing; we don’t see the moment of her death but the millisecond after. In last year’s Maestro, Bradley Cooper’s Leonard Bernstein embraces Carey Mulligan’s pale, weak, headscarf-wearing Felicia Montealegre as she flutters her eyelids and groans quietly; the camera cuts to the window overlooking the verdant green lawn and the sea. Moments later, he’s running onto that same lawn to embrace his children in their grief.

Maestro
Felicia Montealegre (Carey Mulligan) in a headscarf, back toward the camera, with Leonard Bernstein (Bradley Cooper) and their children shortly before her death in MaestroCourtesy of Netflix

There is no one right way to depict death on screen. Movies are about life, and death is a part of life. If you’ve lost a loved one to cancer or something like it, then the movies are either a perpetual trigger, or inexpensive therapy, or both. If you can’t bring yourself to access that grief without an external prompt, you can knowingly sit yourself down for a film that promises to demagnetize them through sheer will and swooning violins. There is a thin line between gratuitous and tasteful, maudlin and real, and that line is not located in the same place for every viewer. A wet cheek competition between Beaches and Terms of Endearment is bound to be too close to call.

But in the case of We Live in Time, I felt simultaneously spared the retraumatization of reliving painful memories shot for shot, and invited to access those same memories to fill in the movie’s intentional gaps. One might argue the scene lacks the gut-punch of Winger or Shannon or Mulligan fading away before our eyes; it is a PG moment in an R-rated movie. The film has given us sex and childbirth, why stop short of death? 

But for a movie defined by grief and loss, whose trailer promises to lift you up, tear you to shreds, then expel you from the theater a little more wizened to the way life giveth and then taketh away, this channeling of Tara Lipinski at death’s door ultimately works. It continues in the long cornball tradition of “did you ever know that you’re my hero,” of Marvin and Tammy dancing playfully on Ms. Sarandon’s grave. A reprieve without sacrificing a release. The memories get folded into the mundane like eggs into pancake batter. Life goes on. It has to.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

What we learned from the Post Office boss

Published

on

What we learned from the Post Office boss
PA Media Post Office chief executive Nick Read arriving to give evidence to the Post Office Horizon IT inquiryPA Media

All eyes were on outgoing Post Office chief executive Nick Read this week as he spent three days in front of the inquiry into the Horizon IT scandal.

Mr Read replaced former boss Paula Vennels in 2019 and was brought in to “right the wrongs of the past”.

Wrongful prosecutions may have stopped, but he still had questions to answer about how much the organisation has really changed when he gave evidence.

Mr Read had taken leave of absence from his day job to prepare for the inquiry.

Unlike the appearance of his predecessor, Paula Vennells, there were no tears. But there were some key revelations.

Advertisement

Here are five things we learned from his evidence.

Told not to ‘dig into’ the past

It has become clear that, either by accident or design, Mr Read was not made aware of the scale of the challenge facing him at the Post Office.

Between 1999 and 2015, hundreds of sub-postmasters were wrongly prosecuted when faulty Horizon accounting software made it look as though money was missing from branches.

Advertisement

When Mr Read took the top job in September 2019, the organisation had just lost one High Court judgement to a group of those wrongfully prosecuted sub-postmasters and was about to lose another.

However, there was no reference to the ongoing legal challenges in his job description. The flawed IT system Horizon was not mentioned once.

In fact, the Post Office’s top lawyer reportedly told Mr Read not to “dig into” what had happened in the past.

He was even told there was no “huge PR risk”. He said the organisation was partly in denial, partly in paralysis.

Advertisement

Regarding the people who came before him, Mr Read told the inquiry that many of the Post Office’s former leaders “appear not to have been held to account”.

Frustrated about his own pay

Mr Read’s leadership has been dogged by controversy about his own remuneration. His former HR director claimed he was “obsessed” with getting a pay rise.

He admitted he had been “frustrated at times”, had repeatedly lobbied for more money, and even took legal and PR advice from friends.

Advertisement

Mr Read said it never became a distraction, but did apologise for how “poor” it looked given so many victims are still waiting for compensation.

Claims about bullying, misogyny, and pay had come from people who had left under a cloud, he said.

He even alleged, in his written witness statement, that one of those people, former chair Henry Staunton, had fallen asleep in board meetings.

Government using Post Office as a ‘shield’

Advertisement

New figures released this week show that £363m has already been paid out to former sub-postmasters in financial redress, but many are still waiting.

Before Mr Read began giving his evidence, the inquiry chair emotionally revealed that another victim passed away last week without ever receiving the money she was owed.

The Post Office boss said it was of “deep regret” to him that the process was taking so long. He blamed bureaucracy, not prejudice or penny pinching.

He said it was “astonishing” that it was his organisation managing some of the schemes, given the lack of trust people have in the Post Office.

Advertisement

Could the government be using the Post Office as a “shield” to remove itself from compensation decisions? “That could be a description, yes,” he admitted.

Getty Images Red Post Office sign, with Bureau de Change on a smaller sign hanging underneath itGetty Images

Staff implicated by the scandal still working

For many sub-postmasters, the continued employment of people who investigated them or were at the Post Office at the height of the scandal is a bone of contention.

Mr Read revealed three employees are still being investigated as part of Project Phoenix. That means they’ve been accused of wrongdoing.

He also admitted a “handful” of investigators were still with the organisation – albeit in different roles now.

Advertisement

The chief executive wanted to assure the inquiry he would not ignore specific allegations and would ask people to step back from roles if it helped with sub-postmaster confidence.

However, when he was shown meeting notes suggesting ministers were happy for the Post Office to be more robust and not worry about employment tribunals, Mr Read was forced to admit they had struggled to “move people on” from the organisation.

Contract for sub-postmasters is ‘heavy-handed’

“Where has the money gone?” It is one of the many, as yet, unanswered questions in this scandal.

Advertisement

Mr Read was repeatedly questioned about the whereabouts of the cash put up by sub-postmasters to cover apparent shortfalls in their branch accounts. The boss put a new figure on the missing money: £36m.

Mr Read said he was annoyed it was proving difficult to work out.

He expressed surprise at survey results suggesting sub-postmasters are still facing problems and using their own savings to make losses good.

Meanwhile, inquiry lawyers pointed to new sub-postmaster contracts which still refer to the Post Office’s investigatory powers, including evidential interview processes under caution. Mr Read admitted this might be “heavy-handed”.

Advertisement

Mr Read’s evidence might now be complete, but he has several months left in the role. He assured the inquiry he would spend the time working to bring about more change. Sub-postmasters will be watching closely.

Source link

Continue Reading

Travel

The pretty Europe train ride that goes through medieval cities, ancient castles and beer spas

Published

on

Max Molyneux took a pretty European train ride that goes through medieval cities and ancient castles

STARING at the gigantic copper cauldron where the King of England used to bathe, I kick myself for ­forgetting my swimmers.

It’s not often you get the chance to share the same hot tub as the supreme ruler of the British Empire.

Max Molyneux took a pretty European train ride that goes through medieval cities and ancient castles

5

Max Molyneux took a pretty European train ride that goes through medieval cities and ancient castlesCredit: Supplied
Max's journey began in Prague

5

Advertisement
Max’s journey began in PragueCredit: Getty

I’m in a spa town deep in a Bohemian forest, unearthing areas of the Czech Republic I’d never heard of.

For three exciting days I would be exploring this beautiful central European country entirely by rail.

My journey begins in Prague. The beautiful capital city on the Vltava River is packed with history.

Climbing the hill up to Prague castle is a must.

Advertisement

The fortress is the largest castle complex in the world. Inside its towering walls are historical buildings and museums including the Old Royal Palace and the city’s gothic temple, St Vitus Cathedral.

That evening I catch a train west.

Unlike those in the UK, trains in Czechia run smoothly and are dirt cheap.

Prague is soon far behind as the IC 558 train trundles along, following the Berounka river’s meandering path through the countryside.

Advertisement

I catch snapshots through the window.

Paddle boarders punt down the river.

The ‘ultimate city break’ just a few hours from the UK with beer spas and lager for £1.50

Giggling kids tumble down a giant inflatable slide at a village fete.

As the sun sets the train pulls into the serene spa town of Marianske Lazne in the deep Bohemian forest.

Advertisement

Since local monks discovered the mineral-rich springs in the early 19th century, people have been coming here to drink, bathe in, and even inject the healing water and gases that bubble out of the ground.

The town’s heyday was in the Victorian era when spa treatments were popular among high society.

One such spa obsessive was King Edward VII, who visited Marianske Lanze nine times for weight-loss treatments in a purpose-built room at the Nové Lázně spa.

The hotel is still there and for a hefty price, guests can book a session in the large copper bath he used.

Advertisement

My own treatment takes place at the Falkensteiner hotel and spa, a five-star resort with a 2,500sq metre spa complex, 162 rooms, heated pool, excellent restaurant and stylish bar.

After a buffet breakfast, I’m ushered into a dimly lit wood-panelled room where a bath of warm water the colour of milky tea is waiting.

Max at a beer spa

5

Max at a beer spaCredit: Supplied

The slightly sparkling mineral-rich water is pumped directly from the hotel’s own Alexandra Spring, 800 metres away.

Advertisement

The treatment is said to widen blood vessels, lowering blood pressure and improving circulation to relax the mind and body.

The health benefits of spa treatments like this are taken seriously.
Drinking fountains dotted around the town deliver water from the local springs.

Iron-rich and metallic- tasting it is believed to help alleviate inflammation. I hope it does, because it tastes revolting.

Staying at the spa resort hotels is pricey.

Advertisement

But there are plenty of cheaper hotels in the town and treatments at the spa complexes are available for walk-in customers too.

Czechs are the world’s most prolific beer drinkers, consuming 184.1 litres of it each every year.

Nowhere is this obsession more obvious than in my next stop, the city of Pilsen.

It’s just over an hour away by rail and my train ticket costs the equivalent of £6.

Advertisement

Home of the world-famous Pilsner beer, the town is swimming in the stuff and by the end of the day, I will be too — literally.

Among the most popular brews is the famous Pilsner Urquell. The first ever pilsner beer, it has been brewed here since 1842.

A tour of the Pilsner Urquell brewery is fascinating.

The 90-minute walk-through shows the original brewing method and vats from the early 19th century.

Advertisement

Then, the modern, vastly scaled-up operation, where staggering amounts are brewed, bottled then shipped worldwide.

The tour ends in the miles of subterranean tunnels where the beer was once stored.

Here, brewmasters keep the traditional method alive, brewing the Pilsner in oak barrels.

Comparisons are regularly made to the modern method to ensure it tastes authentic.

Advertisement

And you can judge for yourself, with a glass of cold Pilsner poured straight from the barrel at the end.

I head off to soak up some more beer, this time through my pores.

On the outskirts of Pilsen, at the Purkmistr Brewery, an interesting mash-up has spawned the “beer spa” — a big wooden bathtub full of warm, hoppy lager, minus the alcohol (it dries out the skin).

Submerged up to my neck in barley, hops and yeast with a large keg of pilsner within arm’s reach and Oasis’s Wonderwall playing over the complex’s sound system, I feel I have achieved lager-nirvana.

Advertisement
The serene spa town of Marianske Lazne is deep in the Bohemian forest

5

The serene spa town of Marianske Lazne is deep in the Bohemian forestCredit: Getty
Pilsen is home to the world-famous Pilsner beer

5

Pilsen is home to the world-famous Pilsner beerCredit: Getty

GO: Czech Republic

GETTING THERE: Wizz Air flies from Luton to Prague from £17.99 each way.

Advertisement

See wizzair.com.

For Czech Railway ­tickets see https://cd.cz.

STAY THERE: One night’s B&B at the 5* Falkensteiner Hotel & Spa is from £162.45 per night.

For more information see falkensteiner.com.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

Households to get cost of living payments of up to £500 this month – how to check if you’re eligible

Published

on

Households to get cost of living payments of up to £500 this month - how to check if you're eligible

HOUSEHOLDS across England can get up to a whopping £2,665 worth of cost of living payments this month.

The money comes via the Household Support Fund (HSF) which is worth £421million in total.

Households could be entitled to some free cash

1

Households could be entitled to some free cashCredit: Getty

The fund has been split up between councils in England who are in charge of distributing their allocation before the end of September.

Advertisement

What you can get depends on where you live, as each local authority has been given its own unique amount.

Now households across England are being offered a collective of £2,665 cost of living payments – with up to £500 per household depending on your location.

The government recently encouraged state pensioners who have just missed out on a Winter Fuel Payment to claim money from the Household Support Fund where they live instead.

Discussing the fund, the government said: “Over a million pensioners will still receive the Winter Fuel Payments, and our drive to boost Pension Credit take up has already seen a 152per cent increase in claims.

Advertisement

“Many others will also benefit from the £150 Warm Home Discount to help with energy bills overwinter while our extension of the Household Support Fund will help with the cost of food, heating and bills.”

Below is a list of councils known to be offering support and how much:

  • Brent: £500
  • Blackpool: £300
  • Rutland: £200
  • Herefordshire: £500
  • Sunderland: £220
  • Bracknell Forest: £315
  • Rotherham: £250
  • Wiltshire: £200
  • Cambridgeshire: £110

You will only receive the payment if you were found to have been eligible after applying.

Anyone who qualifies for help will have received an email telling them.

Martin Lewis issues warning to anyone aged under 22 – do you have £2,000 in a forgotten account

A maximum of one payment will be made per household and any payments are being made direct into bank accounts.

Advertisement

Some councils started distributing help in April and have already depleted their share, so you might have missed out for now.

The Household Support Fund has been extended multiple times since its inception in October 2021, so it may be extended again though.

There are currently a number of councils offering help via the HSF.

Leicestershire Council is handing out payments worth £300 to thousands of households.

Advertisement

Households in Stockport can claim up to £315 worth of free supermarket vouchers to help with the cost of living.

Meanwhile, Wokingham Council is handing out grants worth up to £140.

If you want to check if you are eligible for help, contact your local council.

You can find what council area you fall under by using the Government’s council locator tool.

Advertisement

How else to get help with the cost of living

If you’re not eligible for the Household Support Fund in your local area, it’s worth checking if you qualify for benefits.

Recent figures from Policy in Practice reveal millions of people aren’t claiming the extra help when they could be.

In total, £23billion went unclaimed over the last financial year, with £8.3billion worth of Universal Credit not claimed for.

You can apply for benefits on the Government’s website.

Advertisement

It’s not just extra money you get from benefits either, with a number opening up additional perks.

Those on Universal Credit can get help covering the cost of childcare, for example, while those on Pension Credit can get a free TV licence.

Those on the Guarantee Credit element of Pension Credit also qualify for the Warm Home Discount – a £150 discount off energy bills once a year.

Advertisement

You may also be able to get grants to cover your energy bills if you’ve fallen into arrears.

A number of energy firms offer grants to struggling customers, including Scottish Power, Octopus Energy and British Gas.

If you’re struggling to pay your bills, speak to your supplier to see if they can give you any help.

Household Support Fund explained

Advertisement

Sun Savers Editor Lana Clements explains what you need to know about the Household Support Fund.

If you’re battling to afford energy and water bills, food or other essential items and services, the Household Support Fund can act as a vital lifeline.

The financial support is a little-known way for struggling families to get extra help with the cost of living.

Every council in England has been given a share of £421million cash by the government to distribute to local low income households.

Advertisement

Each local authority chooses how to pass on the support. Some offer vouchers whereas others give direct cash payments.

In many instances, the value of support is worth hundreds of pounds to individual families.

Just as the support varies between councils, so does the criteria for qualifying.

Many councils offer the help to households on selected benefits or they may base help on the level of household income.

Advertisement

The key is to get in touch with your local authority to see exactly what support is on offer.

And don’t delay, the scheme has been extended until April 2025 but your council may dish out their share of the Household Support Fund before this date.

Once the cash is gone, you may find they cannot provide any extra help so it’s crucial you apply as soon as possible.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

News

Observer falls outside Scott Trust’s ‘core responsibilities’, minutes from 1993 suggest

Published

on

Observer falls outside Scott Trust's 'core responsibilities', minutes from 1993 suggest

New evidence has come to light from a Scott Trust meeting that appears to support Guardian Media Group senior management’s contention that The Observer does not have the same protections in place as The Guardian.

GMG is owned by the Scott Trust whose purpose, as set out in 1992, is “to secure the financial and editorial independence of The Guardian in perpetuity”.

The Observer was bought by GMG in 1993 and the company is now in talks to sell the world’s oldest Sunday newspaper title to Tortoise Media, prompting fierce opposition from staff and from leading UK cultural figures.

Press Gazette has seen notes from a meeting of the Scott Trust that year which appears to support the contention that the body always intended for The Observer to be treated differently from The Guardian (which the Scott Trust has owned since 1936).

The joint Guardian and Observer NUJ chapel passed a motion of no confidence in their owners on 19 September saying the proposed sale of The Observer was a “betrayal of the Scott Trust’s commitment to The Observer as part of the Guardian News and Media Family”.

Advertisement


And three former editors of The Observer this week noted in a letter to the Scott Trust that when The Guardian bought the title in 1993, then chair of the trust Hugo Young said: “The trust safeguards will be fully extended to The Observer, which will be edited independently of The Guardian and retain its separate character.”

Content from our partners
Advertisement

But Press Gazette has seen a note from the minutes of a 1993 meeting of The Scott Trust which said: “Mr Young felt that although we would want it to succeed, and it would have the benefits conferred to it as any other company owned by the trust, The Observer couldn’t be viewed in the same light as The Guardian.

“Mr Jonathan Scott [another member of the Trust] said that The Observer fell outside the Trust’s core responsibilities and agreed while every effort should be made to make it profitable, it shouldn’t be to the detriment of The Guardian.”

Guardian Media Group management believes that the Hugo Young quote used in the letter from former Observer editors related only to editorial independence.

In a statement accompanying the 2023/2024 Guardian accounts current chair of the trust Ole Jaco Sunder said: “We must be honest about areas of the business that are not part of our future growth and adapt.”

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Press Gazette understands that the 70 Observer staff who would transfer across to Tortoise Media are finally set to get more information.

Staff are concerned about their job security and want to know who is funding the bid for The Observer. They are also concerned that promised investment of £5m per year will be insufficient to support the title as a standalone business.

Around 80 leading UK cultural figures have signed an open letter to the Scott Trust describing proposals to sell The Observer as “a betrayal” of liberal journalism.

Press Gazette understands that further disclosure from Tortoise Media to Observer staff has been hampered by the fact negotiations have been ongoing but that it is now able to share more details next week.

Advertisement

Speaking on his Media Confidential podcast this week, former Guardian editor and Scott Trust member Alan Rusbridger noted that the Scott Trust’s publicly stated “subsidiary purpose” is “in promoting the causes of freedom in the press and liberal journalism, both in Britain and elsewhere”. He said: “That is code for The Observer.”

Guardian Media Group’s 1993 annual report described The Observer as a “natural stablemate” of The Guardian and noted that it was integrated into the business “in such a manner as would protect its long term future”.

Email pged@pressgazette.co.uk to point out mistakes, provide story tips or send in a letter for publication on our “Letters Page” blog

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Reeves should resist the temptation to ditch IFRS

Published

on

I fear that in the Budget this month UK chancellor Rachel Reeves may be seduced by the proposal your distinguished contributing editor Andy Haldane puts forward for jettisoning International Financial Reporting Standards — the accounting rules for public companies (Opinion, FT Weekend, August 5).

Deriding these standards as probably “not . . . among the finest inventions of the human mind”, Haldane contends that they have materially damped business investment in the EU and the UK, and delayed decarbonisation. The suggestion is that by decreeing they be ditched the chancellor could boost investment, raise gross domestic product, cut carbon emissions and burnish her reputation for cutting red tape — and all this without spending government money. On the face of it, a very tempting addition to her other measures due to be announced on October 30.

I normally find Haldane’s pieces persuasive. But not this time, because he seriously misunderstands the current form and past development of international, UK and US financial reporting standards (admittedly, not a quick and easy read for a non-accountant). This negatively impacts the force of his statistical work and the heroic inferences he seeks to draw.

And he has turned a blind eye to the significant body of rigorous peer-reviewed analysis of relevant data by independent experts, which presents a markedly contrary picture and concludes that, by reducing information asymmetry in financial markets and increasing transparency, adoption of IFRS has lowered the cost of capital and stimulated, rather than eroded, funding of business investment.

Advertisement

Haldane’s suggested policy would be counter-productive. The chancellor would do well to resist this tempting policy choice.

Geoff Meeks
Emeritus Professor and Fellow
Judge Business School, University of Cambridge, Cambridgeshire, UK

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending