Connect with us

Science & Environment

How unusual has it been?

Published

on

How unusual has it been?


NASA/ISS Image of Hurricane Milton from spaceNASA/ISS

Hurricanes Helene and Milton – which have devastated parts of the south-east United States – have bookended an exceptionally busy period of tropical storms.

In less than two weeks, five hurricanes formed, which is not far off what the Atlantic would typically get in an entire year.

The storms were powerful, gaining strength with rapid speed.

Yet in early September, when hurricane activity is normally at its peak, there were peculiarly few storms.

Advertisement

So, how unusual has this hurricane season been – and what is behind it?

The season started ominously. On 2 July, Hurricane Beryl became the earliest category five hurricane to form in the Atlantic on records going back to 1920.

Just a few weeks earlier in May, US scientists had warned the 2024 season from June to November could be “extraordinary”.

It was thought that exceptionally warm Atlantic temperatures – combined with a shift in regional weather patterns – would make conditions ripe for hurricane formation.

Advertisement

So far, with seven weeks of the official season still to go, there have been nine hurricanes – two more than the Atlantic would typically get.

Bar chart showing number of named storms in the Atlantic since 1990. There is large variation from year to year, with 2005 and 2020 standing out as being particularly active seasons. Between 17 and 25 storms were forecast for 2024.

However, the total number of tropical storms – which includes hurricanes but also weaker storms – has been around average, and less than was expected at the start of the year.

After Beryl weakened, there were only four named storms, and no major hurricanes, until Helene became a tropical storm on 24 September.

That is despite warm waters in the tropical Atlantic, which should favour the growth of these storms.

Across the Main Development Region for hurricanes – an area stretching from the west coast of Africa to the Caribbean – sea surface temperatures have been around 1C above the 1991-2020 average, according to BBC analysis of data from the European climate service.

Advertisement

Atlantic temperatures have been higher over the last decade, mainly because of climate change and a natural weather pattern known as the Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation.

Map showing average sea surface temperatures across the Main Development Region for hurricanes in the Atlantic, where storms tend to form and get more powerful as they travel west, thanks to energy from warm seas. Temperatures have been higher than normal, marked by oranges. Below is a graph showing increasing temperatures in this region over this period since 1940, marked by a shift from blue to red.

The recipe for hurricane formation involves a complex mix of ingredients beyond sea temperatures, and these other conditions were not right.

“The challenge [for forecasting] is that other factors can change quickly, on the timescale of days to weeks, and can work with or against the influence of sea surface temperatures,” explains Christina Patricola, associate professor at Iowa State University.

Researchers are still working to understand why this was the case, but likely reasons include a shift to the West African monsoon and an abundance of Saharan dust.

These both hampered storm development by creating unfavourable conditions in the atmosphere.

Advertisement

But even during this period, scientists were warning that the oceans remained exceptionally warm and that intense hurricanes were still possible through the rest of the season.

And in late September, they came.

Chart showing when major hurricanes have occurred since 1940, divided into category three, four and five. Most storms have occurred around early September, shown by a high concentration of dots in the centre. Hurricane Beryl formed particularly early and is shown on the left, while Helene, Kirk and Milton formed after the usual peak, so are slightly to the right.

Starting with Helene, six tropical Atlantic storms were born in quick succession.

Fuelled by very warm waters – and now more favourable atmospheric conditions – these storms strengthened, with five becoming hurricanes.

Four of these five underwent what is known as “rapid intensification”, where maximum sustained wind speeds increase by at least 30 knots (35mph; 56km/h) in 24 hours.

Advertisement

Historical data suggests that only around one in four hurricanes rapidly intensify on average.

Rapid intensification can be particularly dangerous, because these quickly increasing wind speeds can give communities less time to prepare for a stronger storm.

Hurricane Milton strengthened by more than 90mph in 24 hours – one of the fastest such cases of intensification ever recorded, according to BBC analysis of data from the National Hurricane Center.

Graph showing the nine hurricanes so far in 2024, arranged by their date, and maximum sustained wind speed. After Beryl in June/July, there was a gap until Debby and Ernesto in August, followed by another gap to Francine in early September and another gap until Helene in late September. Thereafter, Isaac, Kirk, Leslie and Milton formed in quick succession. Beryl and Milton were the two strongest hurricanes, so peak highest on the graph.

Scientists at the World Weather Attribution group have found that the winds and rain from both Helene and Milton were worsened by climate change.

“One thing this hurricane season is illustrating clearly is that the impacts of climate change are here now,” explains Andra Garner from Rowan University in the US.

Advertisement

“Storms like Beryl, Helene, and Milton all strengthened from fairly weak hurricanes into major hurricanes within 12 hours or less, as they travelled over unnaturally warm ocean waters.”

Milton also took an unusual, although not unprecedented, storm path, tracking eastward through the Gulf of Mexico, where waters have been exceptionally warm.

“It is very rare to see a [category] five hurricane appearing in Gulf of Mexico,” says Xiangbo Feng, research scientist in tropical cyclones at the University of Reading.

Warmer oceans make stronger hurricanes – and rapid intensification – more likely, because it means storms can pick up more energy, potentially leading to higher wind speeds.

Advertisement

What about the rest of the season?

US forecasters are currently watching an area of thunderstorms located over the Cabo Verde Islands off the west coast of Africa.

This could develop into another tropical storm over the next couple of days, but that remains uncertain.

As for the rest of the season, high sea surface temperatures remain conducive for further storms.

Advertisement

There is also the likely development of the natural La Niña weather phenomenon in the Pacific, which often favours Atlantic hurricane formation as it affects wind patterns.

But further activity will rely on other atmospheric conditions remaining favourable, which are not easy to predict.

Either way, this season has already highlighted how warm seas fuelled by climate change are already increasing the chances of the strongest hurricanes – something that is expected to continue as the world warms further.

“Hurricanes occur naturally, and in some parts of the world they are regarded as part of life,” explains Kevin Trenberth, a distinguished scholar at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in Boulder, Colorado, USA.

Advertisement

“But human-caused climate change is supercharging them and exacerbating the risk of major damage.”



Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Science & Environment

WTI, Brent head to small weekly gain

Published

on

WTI, Brent head to small weekly gain


2025 will 'definitely' be a problematic year for oil, says OPIS' Tom Kloza

U.S. crude oil on Friday was on pace to eek out its second weekly gain in a row as Israel prepares to retaliate against Iran.

The U.S. benchmark has gained 1% this week, while global benchmark Brent is ahead 0.8%. Oil prices have gained more than 10% through Thursday’s close since Iran hit Israel with ballistic missiles last week.

“Nevertheless, sustaining bullish price momentum in oil has proven to be a high maintenance task: without additional catalysts, the ‘war’ and ‘stimulus’ premiums have shown easy susceptibility to fading,” Natasha Kaneva, head of global commodity strategy at JP Morgan, told clients in a Friday note.

Advertisement

Here are Friday’s energy prices:

  • West Texas Intermediate November contract: $75.21 per barrel, down 64 cents, or 0.84%. Year to date, U.S. crude oil has gained nearly 5%.
  • Brent December contract: $78.77 per barrel, down 63 cents, or 0.79%. Year to date, the global benchmark has increased about 2%.
  • RBOB Gasoline November contract:  $2.1414 per gallon, down 0.44%. Year to date, gasoline is ahead 1.7%.
  • Natural Gas November contract: $2.685 per gallon, up 0.37%. Year to date, gas has risen about 6%.

Israel’s security cabinet met Thursday to discuss the country’s response to Iran’s attack, according to media reports. President Joe Biden and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spoke by phone on Wednesday.

Traders have worried that Israel will hit Iran’s oil industry, potentially triggering a cycle of escalation that causes a significant disruption of supplies in the Middle East. Biden has discouraged Israel from targeting Iran’s oilfields. The Arab Gulf states have also reportedly lobbied the White House to pressure Israel to refrain from hitting Iranian energy infrastructure.

“We expect that the White House is potentially encouraging Israel to target refineries instead of oil export facilities, arguing that the economic impact would be more directly felt by Iran,” Helima Croft, head of global commodities strategy at RBC Capital Markets told clients in a Thursday note.

Croft warned, however, that the U.S. influence may have waned since April, when Israel’s response to Iran’s first missile and drone attack was relatively muted.

Advertisement

Don’t miss these energy insights from CNBC PRO:



Source link

Continue Reading

Science & Environment

Tiniest ‘ruler’ ever measures distances as small as an atom’s width

Published

on

Tiniest 'ruler' ever measures distances as small as an atom's width


This fluorescent technique can precisely measure minuscule distances

Steffen J. Sahl / Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences

The tiniest “ruler” ever is so precise that it can measure the width of a single atom within a protein.

Advertisement

Proteins and other large molecules, or macromolecules, sometimes fold into the wrong shape, and this can affect the way they function. Some structural changes even play a role in conditions like Alzheimer’s disease. To understand this process, it is important to determine the exact distance between atoms – and clusters of atoms – within these macromolecules, says Steffen Sahl at the Max Planck Institute for Multidisciplinary Sciences in Germany.

“We wanted to go from a microscope that maps positions of macromolecules relative to each other, to taking this bold step of going within the macromolecule,” he says.

To construct their intramolecular “ruler”, Sahl and his colleagues used fluorescence, or the fact that some molecules glow when illuminated. They attached two fluorescent molecules to two different points on a larger protein molecule and then used a laser beam to illuminate them. Based on the light the glowing molecules released, the researchers could measure the distance between them.

Advertisement

They used this method to measure distances between the molecules of several well-understood proteins. The smallest of those distances was just 0.1 nanometres – the width of a typical atom. The fluorescent ruler also gave accurate measurements up to about 12 nanometres, meaning it had a broader measuring range than can be achieved with many traditional methods.

In one example, the researchers looked at two different forms of the same protein and found that they could distinguish between them because the same two points were 1 nanometre apart for one shape and 4 nanometres apart for the other. In another experiment, they measured tiny distances in a human bone cancer cell.

Sahl says the team achieved this precision by taking advantage of several recent technological advances, like better microscopes and fluorescent molecules that don’t flicker and don’t produce a glow that could be confused with some other effect.

“I don’t know how they got their microscopes so stable. The new technique is definitely a technical advance,” says Jonas Ries at the University of Vienna in Austria. But future studies will have to determine for which exact molecules it will prove most useful as a source of information for biologists, he says.

Advertisement

“While it boasts impressive precision, the new method may not necessarily achieve the same level of detail, or resolution, when applied to more complex biological systems,” says Kirti Prakash at The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust and Institute of Cancer Research in the UK. Additionally, he says that several other new techniques are already becoming competitive in terms of measuring smaller and smaller distances.

Sahl says his team will now work on two tracks: refining the method further and expanding their ideas about which macromolecules they can now peer inside.

Topics:



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science & Environment

What is Elon Musk’s Starship space vehicle?

Published

on


Getty Images Starship rocket launching into space with trail of fuel behind itGetty Images

Elon Musk wants his new rocket to revolutionise spaceflight. And that rocket, Starship, is now the largest and most powerful spacecraft ever built.

It’s also designed to be fully and rapidly reusable. His private company SpaceX, which is behind the creation, is hoping to develop a spaceship that can be used more like a plane than a traditional rocket system, being able to land, refuel and take off again a few hours after landing.

When will Starship’s next launch be?

While there’s no exact date set yet for the rocket’s next flight, it could be as soon as this weekend – and SpaceX is expecting big things.

Advertisement

This will be Starship’s fifth outing, and all eyes will be on the landing phases – specifically, the return of the vehicle’s bottom part, the Super Heavy booster.

So far we’ve only seen what might be called a simulated landing at sea, or ‘splashdown’. This will be the first time we hope to see the booster return to the launch pad.

For a spacecraft to be reusable, it needs to be able to land safely.

The SpaceX founder has said they will try to catch the booster in mid-air on its return to Earth using the giant mechanical arms, or ‘chopsticks’, of the launch tower – or as Musk calls it, “Mechazilla”.

Advertisement

That’s something that’s never been done before, and eventually SpaceX want to catch the Ship – the top part of the vehicle – in the same way. But that won’t happen on the upcoming test flight.

Will Starship go to Mars?

None of Starship’s missions so far have been crewed, and there’s no plans to put people aboard for the next flight either.

But Musk and his company do have grand designs that the rocket system will one day take humanity to Mars.

Advertisement

A Mars trip isn’t on the horizon just yet. But the behemoth rocket already has some impressive specs, and dwarfs all of its predecessors.

How big and powerful is Starship?

A side by side comparison of Starship with notable former rocket models, including NASA's Saturn V

Starship is the largest and most powerful rocket system which has ever flown

Starship is a two-stage vehicle. The “Ship” is the uppermost part, and that sits atop a booster called Super Heavy.

Thirty-three engines at the base of this booster produce around 74 meganewtons of thrust. To put that into perspective, it’s almost 700 times as powerful as the thrust generated by the common passenger plane, the Airbus A320neo.

Advertisement

If you’ve flown with Aer Lingus, British Airways or Lufthansa, imagine the kick of taking off in one of those planes. Then multiply that by 700.

The vehicle has grown about a metre since its second test flight in June of this year, with Starship now measuring just over 120m in total.

This additional height comes from the Super Heavy booster itself being made 1m longer.

A diagram showing Starship being assembled on the launchpad using the launch tower

It’s also about twice as powerful as the Saturn V rocket which first took humanity to the Moon’s surface.

SpaceX says that power should be able to move a payload weighing at least 150 tonnes from the launchpad to low-Earth orbit.

Advertisement
A visual aid showing Starship resting on the launchpad beside the launch tower, with details of Starship's technical specifications

The mechanical chopsticks of the launch tower are used to lift Starship’s parts into position

Both the Ship and the Super Heavy booster are fuelled with a mixture of icy-cold liquid methane and liquid oxygen fuel, known as methalox.

What has Starship done so far?

Starship has had four test flights up to now. During the first flight, the rocket system exploded early, before the Booster was able to separate.

It’s worth noting that such hiccups are part of SpaceX’s plan to speed up development by launching systems they know are not perfect and learning from the faults.

Advertisement

And each test has seen real progress – first with a hitch-free separation, and eventually a successful return, where both the Ship and the Booster made a controlled descent and hovered above the Indian Ocean and Gulf of Mexico respectively until splashing down.

Getty Images Fire and smoke hang in the sky after Starship's explosion.Getty Images

Fire and smoke hung in the sky after Starship ultimately exploded after a successful separation during its second outing

How does Starship land?

SpaceX A Super Heavy booster is worked on at Starbase in TexasSpaceX

A Super Heavy booster is worked on at Starbase in Texas

Anyone watching nearby as the booster returns to Earth can expect a thunderous boom as it slows down from supersonic speeds.

While SpaceX plan to catch the booster with the launch tower, we won’t get a similar return of the top part – the Ship – this time. When we do, it shouldn’t look too different from the Super Heavy’s descent.

Advertisement

But since there’s no launch tower on Mars, or on the Moon for that matter, the Ship also needs to be able to land on its legs.

To do that, it manoeuvres itself horizontally as it starts to descend, in what Musk has called a ‘belly-flop’ manoeuvre. This increases the drag on the vehicle, slowing it down.

SpaceX Starship performing a "belly flop" manuever while falling back to Earth before firing its engines to flip it into the vertical position
SpaceX

Starship “belly flops” back to Earth before firing its engines to flip it into the vertical position

Once the Ship gets close enough to the surface, it’s then slow enough to fire its engines in a way that flips the vehicle into a vertical position.

The Ship then uses its rockets to guide itself down safely and land on a hard pad upon its landing legs.

Advertisement

All of this has been done by the Ship on its previous flight – apart from landing on a pad. So far it has only landed in the sea.

A 4-panel image showing the Ship part of Starship returning from Earth and being caught by the launch tower's mechanical arms

SpaceX hope to eventually catch the Ship using the arms of the launch tower – but they’ll only try to catch the booster this way on the next test flight

What are the challenges?

One of the purposes of test flying is to highlight problem areas, and the quick turnaround between each test flight means that weak links have to be redesigned at lightning speed.

If you get one thing wrong, the entire internal structure of the rocket could be melted by hot gases.

Advertisement
SpaceX The "Ship" is stacked on top of the Super Heavy booster. The fins sticking out from the booster help steer it back to Earth.SpaceX

What else will Starship be used for?

There are a few things Starship could be used for soon.

So far Musk has used his own rockets, like the Falcon 9 series, to launch his own commercial satellites, known as Starlink.

Those satellites have a short lifespan of around five years, and the flock in orbit needs to be constantly replenished just to keep the same number of satellites in space.

Getty Images People watch from Cape Canaveral, Florida, as SpaceX launch 49 Starlink satellites on board a Falcon 9 rocket Getty Images

People watch from Cape Canaveral, Florida, as SpaceX launch 49 Starlink satellites on board a Falcon 9 rocket

Nasa also wants to use Starship as part of its Artemis programme, which aims to establish a long-term human presence on the Moon.

Advertisement
NASA An artistic rendering of Starship on the Moon bearing the USA flag.NASA

NASA has plans to use Starship for a lunar mission in 2026

In the more distant future, Musk wants Starship to make long-haul trips to Mars and back – about a nine month trip each way.

“You could conceivably have five or six people per cabin, if you really wanted to crowd people in. But I think mostly we would expect to see two or three people per cabin, and so nominally about 100 people per flight to Mars,” Musk said.

The idea is to send the Ship part of the vehicle into low-Earth orbit, and “park” it there. It could then be refuelled in orbit by a SpaceX ‘tanker’ – essentially another Ship without the windows – for its onward journey to Mars.

It’s also conceivable that Starship could be used to launch space telescopes.

Advertisement

The Hubble telescope is about the size of a bus, and the James Webb telescope is almost three times as big as that.

To put up thousands of satellites quickly, or a bigger telescope, you need a big rocket.

Finally, Starship has also been built to carry heavy loads needed to build space stations, and eventually, infrastructure for a human presence on the Moon.

How much greenhouse gas does Starship emit?

Advertisement

A rocket that kicks 700 times harder than a passenger jet is bound to have some impact on the environment.

A draft environmental report by the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) released in July shows that the new licence SpaceX is applying for would allow them 25 launches of Starship per year.

The FAA say this would emit a total of 97,342 tonnes of CO2 equivalent – or 3,894 tonnes per launch.

In comparison, a typical car in the US emits about 4.6 tonnes of CO2 per year, according to the US Environmental Protection Agency.

Advertisement

If we crunch the numbers, that means one launch of Starship emits as much greenhouse gas as 846 cars would emit over the course of a year.

From a sheer numerical standpoint, that’s fairly insignificant compared to say, the commercial aviation industry.

But with Musk hoping to increase the number of launches to potentially hundreds per year in the future, those numbers could start adding up.



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science & Environment

Wall Street analysts downgrade Honeywell. We think they’re making a mistake.

Published

on

Wall Street analysts downgrade Honeywell. We think they're making a mistake.


Honeywell International Inc. signage is displayed on a monitor on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York.

Michael Nagle | Bloomberg | Getty Images

Advertisement

Honeywell stock received a rare downgrade from JPMorgan on Thursday. It’s the first time in more than a decade that analysts at the firm lowered their rating.



Source link

Continue Reading

Science & Environment

Shackleton’s lost ship as never seen before

Published

on

Shackleton's lost ship as never seen before


The new 3D scan lifts the veil of darkness and water from the wreck lying 3km beneath the surface

After more than 100 years hidden in the icy waters of Antarctica, Sir Ernest Shackleton’s ship Endurance has been revealed in extraordinary 3D detail.

For the first time we can see the vessel, which sank in 1915 and lies 3,000m down at the bottom of the Weddell Sea, as if the murky water has been drained away.

Advertisement

The digital scan, which is made from 25,000 high resolution images, was captured when the ship was found in 2022.

It’s been released as part of a new documentary called Endurance, which will be shown at cinemas.

The team has scoured the scan for tiny details, each of which tell a story linking the past to the present.

In the picture below you can see the plates that the crew used for daily meals, left scattered across the deck.

Advertisement
Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust / National Geographic Small white plates lie among the wreckage. They are circled to show up better.Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust / National Geographic

In the next picture there’s a single boot that might have belonged to Frank Wild, Shackleton’s second-in-command.

Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust / National Geographic A boot lying among the wreckage. It is labelled 'Explorer's boot'Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust / National Geographic

Perhaps most extraordinary of all is a flare gun that’s referenced in the journals the crew kept.

Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust / National Geographic A flare gun lies among the wreckage. It is labelled to help it stand out.Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust / National Geographic

The flare gun was fired by Frank Hurley, the expedition’s photographer, as the ship that had been the crew’s home was lost to the ice.

“Hurley gets this flare gun, and he fires the flare gun into the air with a massive detonator as a tribute to the ship,” explains Dr John Shears who led the expedition that found Endurance.

“And then in the diary, he talks about putting it down on the deck. And there we are. We come back over 100 years later, and there’s that flare gun, incredible.”

A doomed mission

Sir Ernest Shackleton was an Anglo-Irish explorer who led the Imperial Trans-Antarctic Expedition, which set out to make the first land crossing of Antarctica.

Advertisement

But the mission was doomed from the outset.

Endurance became stuck in pack ice within weeks of setting off from South Georgia.

The ship, with the crew on board, drifted for months before the order was eventually given to abandon ship. Endurance finally sank on 21 November 1915.

Shackleton and his men were forced to travel for hundreds of miles over ice, land and sea to reach safety – miraculously all 27 of the crew survived.

Advertisement

Their extraordinary story was recorded in their diaries, as well as in Frank Hurley’s photographs, which have had colour added for the Endurance documentary.

BFI/Frank Hurley A colour photograph of Sir Ernest Shackleton on deck surrounded by ship equipment covered in iceBFI/Frank Hurley

Sir Ernest Shackleton aboard the Endurance – now in colour

The ship itself remained lost until 2022.

Its discovery made headlines around the world – and the footage of Endurance revealed that it is beautifully preserved by the icy waters.

The new 3D scan was made using underwater robots that mapped the wreck from every angle, taking thousands of photographs. These were then “stitched” together to create a digital twin.

Advertisement

While footage filmed at this depth can only show parts of Endurance in the gloom, the scan shows the complete 44m long wooden wreck from bow to stern – even recording the grooves carved into the sediment as the ship skidded to a halt on the seafloor.

The model reveals how the ship was crushed by the ice – the masts toppled and parts of the deck in tatters – but the structure itself is largely intact.

Shackleton’s descendants say Endurance will never be raised – and its location in one of the most remote parts of the globe means visiting the wreck again would be extremely challenging.

But Nico Vincent from Deep Ocean Search, who developed the technology for the scans, along with Voyis Imaging and McGill University, said the digital replica offers a new way to study the ship.

Advertisement

“It’s absolutely fabulous. The wreck is almost intact like she sank yesterday,” said Mr Vincent, who was also a co-leader for the expedition.

He said the scan could be used by scientists to study the sea life that has colonised the wreck, to analyse the geology of the sea floor, and to discover new artefacts.

“So this is really a great opportunity that we can offer for the future.”

The scan belongs to the Falklands Maritime Heritage Trust who also funded and organised the expedition to find Shackleton’s ship.

Advertisement

The Endurance documentary is premiering at the London Film Festival on 12 October and will be released in cinemas in the UK on 14 October.

Additional reporting Kevin Church



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Science & Environment

Nature decline is now nearing dangerous tipping points, WWF warns

Published

on

Nature decline is now nearing dangerous tipping points, WWF warns


Getty Images Orang utan with babyGetty Images

Wildlife populations have plummeted, mainly due to habitat loss, WWF figures reveal

Human activity is continuing to drive what conservation charity the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) calls a “catastrophic” loss of species.

From elephants in tropical forests to hawksbill turtles off the Great Barrier Reef, populations are plummeting, according to a stocktake of the world’s wildlife.

The Living Planet Report, a comprehensive overview of the state of the natural world, reveals global wildlife populations have shrunk by an average of 73% in the past 50 years.

Advertisement

The loss of wild spaces was “putting many ecosystems on the brink”, WWF UK head Tanya Steele said, and many habitats, from the Amazon to coral reefs, were “on the edge of very dangerous tipping points”.

© Shutterstock / COULANGES / WWF-Sweden A pair of pink river dolphins© Shutterstock / COULANGES / WWF-Sweden

River dolphins are rapidly disappearing along with their natural habitats

The report is based on the Living Planet Index of more than 5,000 bird, mammal, amphibian, reptile and fish population counts over five decades.

Among many snapshots of human-induced wildlife loss, it reveals 60% of the world’s Amazon pink river dolphins have been wiped out by pollution and other threats, including mining and civil unrest.

It also captured hopeful signs of conservation success.

Advertisement

A sub-population of mountain gorillas in the Virunga Mountains of East Africa increased by about 3% per year between 2010 and 2016, for example.

But the WWF said these “isolated successes are not enough, amid a backdrop of the widespread destruction of habitats”.

Tom Oliver, professor of ecology at the University of Reading, who is unconnected with the report, said when this information was combined with other datasets, insect declines for example, “we can piece together a robust – and worrying – picture of global biodiversity collapse”.

Getty Images Mountain gorilla mother and baby in the Virunga MountainsGetty Images

There are hopeful signs of recovery for one great ape, the mountain gorilla, following decades of conservation work

The report found habitat degradation and loss was the biggest threat to wildlife, followed by overexploitation, invasive species, disease, climate change and pollution.

Advertisement

Lead author and WWF chief scientific adviser Mike Barrett said through human action, “particularly the way that we produce and consume our food, we are increasingly losing natural habitat”.

The report also warns nature loss and climate change are fast pushing the world towards irreversible tipping points, including the potential “collapse” of the Amazon rainforest, whereby it can no longer lock away planet-warming carbon and mitigate the impacts of climate change.

Getty Images Hawksbill turtleGetty Images

Hawksbill turtles are in decline, with nesting females in north-east Queensland, Australia, falling by 57% over 28 years

“Please don’t just feel sad about the loss of nature,” Mr Barrett said.

“Be aware that this is now a fundamental threat to humanity and we’ve really got to do something now.”

Advertisement

Valentina Marconi, from the Zoological Society of London’s Institute of Zoology, told BBC News the natural world was in a “precarious position” but with urgent, collective action from world leaders “we still have the chance to reverse this”.

 © WWF-Aus / Chris Johnson A chinstrap penguin (Pygoscelis antarcticus) balancing on one foot, Antarctic Peninsula, January 2018. © WWF-Aus / Chris Johnson

The report measures declines in bird species such as chinstrap penguins, in Antarctica
© Jacqueline Lisboa / WWF-Brazil Fires in the Brasília National Park, Brazil© Jacqueline Lisboa / WWF-Brazil

Habitat loss is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity

Ms Steele said the report was an “incredible wake-up call”.

“Healthy ecosystems underpin our health, prosperity and wellbeing,” she told BBC News.

“We don’t think this sits on the shoulders of the average citizen – it’s the responsibility of business and of government.

Advertisement

“We need to look after our land and our most precious wild places for future generations.”



Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com