Politics
Miriam Cates: Starmer and Johnson are very different men, but their downfalls are very similar
Miriam Cates is the former MP for Penistone and Stocksbridge.
Among those of us who sat as Conservative MPs in the last parliament, the current political turmoil evokes a strong sense of deja-vu. The parallels between the Mandelson affair and the last weeks of Boris Johnson’s premiership are uncanny. Although Partygate and the Epstein files are worlds apart in terms of their seriousness, both scandals bolstered campaigns to oust sitting prime ministers with large parliamentary majorities.
Both Johnson and Sir Keir Starmer relied on powerful advisors who became lightning rods for backbench discontent. Although Dominic Cummings resigned 18 months before Johnson’s demise, he played a similar role to Morgan McSweeney, who on Sunday was scapegoated for the Mandelson debacle and left Downing Street. In the run up to his departure, Johnson ‘revamped’ his Number 10 operation, losing key aides Dan Rosenfeld and Munira Mirza, and bringing in Guto Hari and Steve Barclay to ‘reboot’ his comms strategy. Similarly for Starmer, Tim Allen is out, standing down to allow “a new No 10 team to be built”.
The first signs of the end for Johnson – and perhaps for Starmer – began with being publicly undermined by a string of senior MPs calling publicly for their Party leader to step down. I will never forget watching David Davis rise to his feet in a packed House of Commons in January 2022 and implore Johnson “for the love of God man; go”. Clive Lewis’ scathing tweets about our current prime minister are somewhat less rousing.
In another parallel between the two cases, the beleaguered prime ministers’ Scottish deputies were among the first to break ranks. In January 2022, Ruth Davidson declared Johnson ‘unfit for office’; on Monday, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar called for Starmer to step down. Politicians north of the border are clearly ahead of the curve.
Ultimately, Johnson was toppled by a slew of ministers resigning en masse; so far Starmer’s cabinet is holding firm, although the support expressed in their tightly coordinated loyal social media posts seems neither heartfelt nor unconditional. And, just as then-chancellor Rishi Sunak was accused of starting a covert leadership campaign early in 2022, so Wes Streeting is thought to be on manoeuvers now.
After a well-received performance at the Parliamentary Labour Party meeting on Monday, Starmer seems safe for now – as did Johnson after he won (narrowly) a vote of no confidence in June 2022. Yet as it was for Johnson, this may yet be a temporary reprieve. Seven weeks after that vote, Johnson was gone, brought down by the fallout from accusations that Chris Pincher, the deputy chief whip drunkenly groped a man in the Carlton Club. For Starmer, any number of potential bumps in the road in the coming weeks may re-ignite the smoking embers of a coup.
If Sir Keir quits, whatever the immediate catalyst for his departure – poor by-election results, a badly received spring statement or perhaps another ministerial scandal – it will not be the true cause of his undoing, just as Johnson’s poor judgement in dithering over Chris Pincher was not the primary reason for his downfall. For both prime ministers, a leadership crisis followed a steady loss of confidence among their MPs that eroded their authority with each political hiccup.
Johnson and Starmer have a tendency to U-turn under pressure; sending backbenchers out to defend unpopular policies one day which are then reversed the next is a surefire way to lose support. But it’s not only U-turns that cause disaffection. Just like Johnson’s Tories in 2022, Starmer’s Labour MPs are watching the plunging polls with horror. I remember the unease in the House of Commons tea room when the Conservative vote share started to fall below 35 per cent in the final months of 2021. The Labour Party is now polling consistently below 20 per cent; backbenchers have every reason to panic. Poor polling convinces many MPs that they have nothing to lose – and everything to gain – by switching leaders.
Of course no two events in politics or history are identical. Just because Johnson was forced out, precipitating a slow and painful Tory demise doesn’t mean the same will happen to Sir Keir and Labour. But the fact that two prime ministers of such different characters, in different parties and under different circumstances, can face such similar situations may indicate that this state of affairs has more to do with our political system than the specific weaknesses of Starmer and Johnson.
We are living through a time of acute political instability. If Starmer premiership ends this year as predicted, he will make way for Britain’s seventh Prime Minister in a decade. The last time a Party leader won a majority at a general election and then went into the next election still as Prime Minister was in 2001, a quarter of a century ago. Of course there have been many periods of turmoil in our history, but the feverish nature of politics over the last 15 years or so feels unprecedented, and shows no signs of abating. Why?
An obvious culprit is the rise of the smartphone, social media and instant messaging. The sheer quantity of information that can now be exchanged, and the ease and instantaneity of communication, have made it vastly easier for MPs to communicate their complaints and opinions with their colleagues – and with journalists – than in the past. When secret plotting involved arranging to meet unseen in dark corridors at pre-arranged times in the Palace of Westminster, there were practical barriers to arranging a mutiny.
Continuous political updates on Twitter (X) allow MPs to take the political temperature every five minutes, rather than once a day while reading the newspaper over their tea room porridge. Instant communications have sped up time; politics now operates in permanent crisis mode, with overstimulated journalists and MPs living on adrenaline, conditioned to react rather than respond to events.
More frequent polling has also made it difficult for MPs to take a longer view of the political cycle. Since 2016, reforms to polling methods have made predictions far more accurate. A few consecutive surveys that show your party is falling in popularity can no longer be dismissed, and with the constant stream of new data, MPs track the polls like a doctor tracks a critical patient’s heart beat – every fluctuation seems to demand a drastic intervention.
But technology is not the only factor driving dissatisfaction with leaders. We are living through a major political realignment, where previously consensus issues like the necessity of strong borders, what it means to be British, and the importance of providing for yourself and your family are now highly contested. The splits on these issues do not always fall along traditional left-right lines, and so have fractured both Labour and Conservative parties. Although both Johnson and Starmer won large parliamentary majorities, neither prime minister ever had a true majority when it came to political direction. I’m not sure Boris ever knew his own mind on the subject of the welfare state, but had he tried to cut benefits he would have found his party just as split as Starmer’s.
The impotence of government has also played a role in discontent. Blairite reforms stripped power away from both parliament and the executive. The inability of ministers to get a grip on immigration or house building owes more to rule by quango than to the incompetence of our leaders. MPs may express discontent over the ‘direction of travel’, but there is nothing quick that prime ministers can do to fix things, instead resorting to ‘resets’ and meaningless talk about ‘values’.
There has also been a growing trend to play the man not the ball, with opposition parties and the press putting pressure on individuals to resign after mistakes, in much the same way as football managers are told to quit after a few bad performances. In the last parliament, Starmer, Angela Rayner et al made a habit of calling for scalps on an almost weekly basis. Now Kemi Badenoch and the Conservatives have taken up where Labour left off, demanding the resignations of Reeves, Rayner, Mandelson and now Starmer.
His Majesty’s Opposition of course exists to challenge the government of the day, but, to me at least, it is unclear how it is in the national interest to continually undermine the position of those in elected office, especially when there are no clear preferable alternatives. If Starmer goes, he may well be replaced by someone far to the left of him; the reaction of the markets would cause genuine pain to voters.
The current political turmoil looks set to continue for some time, and it can’t all be blamed on technology and tactics. Underlying the discontent in both Parliament and the country is a sense that Britain is in decline and that not even a government with a large majority can rescue our country. The public must shoulder some responsibility for our political paralysis; the kinds of painful reforms that are necessary to save Britain – on tax, immigration, energy and planning – are unlikely to command majority support. Most voters – and possibly many MPs – still want lower taxes and higher public spending, something that no prime minister can hope to deliver.
But politicians are to blame too. Johnson and Starmer, like many of their MPs, seem to have no motivating purpose other than ‘managing’ the country well. When ‘management’ fails, it is unsurprising that neither backbenchers nor ministers are able to hold their nerve.
So how do we escape the vortex of political instability? There is no hope to be found in the left of politics; the few individuals who might understand how to rebuild our society and economy are isolated and have insufficient support within their movements.
The answers lie on the right, and as we approach the next election, conservatives in both Reform and the Conservative Party must prepare a radical and detailed programme for government, including repealing Tony Blair’s assault on democratic power. And both parties – and their leaders – must define and communicate a vision for Britain that goes beyond good management, inspiring patriotism and preparing the public for the kind of hardship that will be inevitable if we are going to turn the country around. Stable leadership is still possible; but not for at least three more long years.
Politics
Newslinks for Wednesday 11th February 2026
Allies admit Starmer is too ‘weak’ to sack Streeting after coup speculation
“Sir Keir Starmer is currently too “weak” to sack leadership rival Wes Streeting, the UK prime minister’s allies have admitted, as an uneasy truce descended on the Labour party. The health secretary, suspected by Number 10 of being part of a coup attempt, has been forced to put his ambitions on hold, declaring on Tuesday that Starmer had his “full support”. Starmer urged cabinet ministers to get on with their jobs and to bring an end to leadership speculation, which was sparked after Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar called on Monday for the prime minister to quit. With tensions between Number 10 and Streeting running high, Starmer’s team said the aim now was to calm the situation and reach the relative safety of a House of Commons half-term recess, which starts on Thursday. “I don’t think he can sack Wes, I don’t think he has the strength to sack anyone right now,” said one Starmer ally. “He’s too weak.” A member of Starmer’s team said: “Sacking Wes would just uncork even more political chaos of the kind we’re trying to avoid.” Streeting told reporters that Starmer had not threatened to sack him. Streeting’s team strongly denied the health secretary was working with Sarwar to bring down the prime minister, in what was seen by cabinet ministers as a failed coup.” – Financial Times
- Streeting still ready to challenge Starmer despite show of unity, allies say – The Guardian
- Starmer ‘too weak’ to sack Streeting, allies admit – Daily Telegraph
- Buy Rayner and Sell Streeting, Say UK Labour Insiders as Drama Ebbs – Bloomberg
- Miliband and Burnham turn on Streeting over ‘coup attempt’ – Daily Telegraph
- Ministers warned not to copy Wes Streeting’s release of messages with Peter Mandelson – The Guardian
Comment:
- And the winner from all this is … Ed Miliband – Daniel Finkelstein, The Times
- The Starmer palace coup is a national disgrace – Ambrose Evans-Pritchard, Daily Telegraph
- Dismal PM is rudderless but what follows will be far worse… UK is being dragged into socialist future it never asked for – Ross Clark, The Sun
- Why I’ve bet on unflashy John Healey to lead Labour – Matthew Parris, The Times
- If Labour lurches to the Left, the market mayhem will make Truss fiasco look like fiscal rectitude – Alex Brummer, Daily Mail
- Anyone who thinks Rayner is the answer to Britain’s problems needs their head examined – Allison Pearson, Daily Telegraph
> Today:
> Yesterday:
Starmer’s ex-No 10 spin doctor loses Labour whip over link to sex offender
“Sir Keir Starmer’s former media chief has been suspended from Labour over his links to a convicted sex offender after the Prime Minister faced pressure over the issue from his own MPs, The i Paper has learnt. Matthew Doyle, who now sits in the House of Lords, has had the Labour whip withdrawn over his campaigning for Sean Morton, an ex-Labour councillor in Moray, Scotland, after the candidate was charged with possessing indecent images of children in December 2016. Morton later admitted sex offences. It comes after The i Paper approached No 10 and Baron Doyle over pressure applied by Labour MPs on Starmer to address the issue as the PM addressed a meeting of the parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) while fighting for his political future. In a statement, Doyle apologised for his past association with Morton and admitted “extremely limited” contact with him after his conviction. Starmer asked Doyle to give up the whip after seeing off a botched coup attempt over links between another of his appointees – Peter Mandelson – and the sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.” – The i
- Lord Doyle ‘lied about link to paedophile’ claims Labour – The Times
- Starmer’s former spin doctor suspended over links to sex offender – Daily Telegraph
- Former senior aide to Starmer loses whip over friendship with sex offender – The Guardian
- Starmer plunged into fresh crisis as paedophile-linked peer and former comms chief suspended from Labour – The Independent
Comment:
- How Labour women are torpedoing Starmer’s boy’s club – Kitty Donaldson, The i
- Starmer may have survived a ‘political near death experience’ by the skin of his teeth, but insiders say it may be too late to save his party – Dan Hodges, Daily Mail
> Today:
Labour’s taxes are ‘shameful assault’ on high street says Badenoch
“Kemi Badenoch accused Labour of a “shameful assault” on our high streets amid warnings of a pandemic-like apocalypse for small businesses. The Conservative leader insisted she can reverse the decline of the nation’s town centres and kickstart a jobs boom. And she vowed to end the scourge of boarded-up shops which she blames on Labour’s punishing JobsTax and sky-high business rates. Mrs Badenoch told the Express: “This Government is hammering our high streets out of existence. I’ve spoken to businesses across the country, all of whom say that Labour’s endless tax rises and red tape are making it so much harder for them to stay afloat. This is a shameful assault on the very heart of so many communities, and it cannot continue.” Her blistering attack comes as a new report revealed soaring business rates, wage costs and energy prices are killing the high street with 38 shops closing every day.” – Daily Express
- Why Labour can be blamed for your haircut becoming more expensive – The i
- High streets under strain as SME crisis deepens, MPs warn – Drapers
Comment:
- Rachel Reeves’s ‘jobs tax’ is killing High Streets – Andrew Griffith, Daily Express
News in brief:
- The conservative case for Keir Starmer: Who will keep Left-wing factions in check? – Mary Harrington, UnHerd
- I have so much in common with Angela Rayner, so why can’t I stand her? – Angela Epstein, The Spectator
- No culture above women’s rights – Rebecca Paul, The Critic
- The Labour Party has doomed itself to oblivion – Daniel Hannan, CapX
- No one knows what Labour members want – Ethan Croft, The New Statesman
Politics
Politics Home | Labour Women Push Starmer To Dismantle ‘Boys’ Club’ After Mandelson Scandal

5 min read
As he prepares to address the women’s Parliamentary Labour Party (PLP) on Wednesday afternoon, Keir Starmer is being urged to make the Peter Mandelson scandal a watershed moment in tackling a perceived boys’ club in his party.
The revelation that the Prime Minister appointed Mandelson as US ambassador despite being aware of his links to paedophile financier Jeffrey Epstein has triggered the most perilous period of his premiership so far. In the last few days, he has lost his chief of staff and director of communications, while on Monday, Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar told him to resign.
The Mandelson affair has caused anger and frustration among Labour women in particular.
Labour had 190 women MPs elected at the 2024 general election, the largest number ever returned to the House of Commons by a single political party.
However, many women in the party believe that recent revelations over how Mandelson was appointed typify a deep-rooted misogyny within Labour, with former special adviser Baroness Ayesha Hazarika describing last week’s events as “shameful” for her party.
“I have never known rage and fury and devastation, particularly for female MPs, peers, councillors, party members, as I have over this last week,” she told Sky News at the weekend.
“This is a story about male power and a boys’ club… I’m afraid we have also seen a microcosm of that in politics, particularly Labour politics this week.”
The Starmer administration has faced accusations of being a boys’ club long before the Mandelson affair. Female Labour MPs, such as former transport secretary Louise Haigh, have complained about anonymous briefings targeting women in cabinet. At the same time, Downing Street has been accused of overlooking women to give senior jobs to men.
Seemingly recognising the strength of feeling, the Prime Minister is set to address the Women’s PLP on Wednesday afternoon.
PoliticsHome understands that Starmer has been having meetings with women across the party in recent days to listen to their concerns.
“I do think this is a real opportunity to make progress on misogyny in politics,” one Labour woman MP who preferred to remain anonymous told PoliticsHome.
Following the recent resignations of Morgan McSweeney and Tim Allan as Starmer’s chief of staff and director of communications, respectively, and the expected resignation of Chris Wormald as head of the civil service in the coming weeks, the Prime Minister’s latest government reset is seen as an opportunity to address this perceived problem.
At the time of writing, Home Office permanent secretary Dame Antonia Romeo is expected to replace Wormald as the first female cabinet secretary.
Many Labour women would like to see Steph Driver return to Downing Street to lead the communications operation.
“It depends [on] who gets appointed as to whether the bully boys club improves,” the same MP quoted above added.
She continued: “The women in the PLP have made the right call on each [u-turn] and have privately expressed their concerns at each and every opportunity, and haven’t been to the press. And we have been seen as disloyal for doing so.”
The MP said putting experienced women “in the real positions of power” where they are “listened to” would help the government show it is properly tackling the Mandelson scandal.
Speaking to the wider PLP on Monday night, Starmer pledged to take a more inclusive approach to government, with No 10 having regularly been accused of paying too little attention to the views of backbench MPs in the 18 months it has been in power.
The soft-left Tribune group has called for a cabinet reshuffle to ensure the PM’s senior team better reflects the parliamentary party.
Speaking to PoliticsHome, Labour MP Florence Eshalomi said that moving forward, there “needs to be regular engagement and listening when female parliamentarians raise concerns”, adding “the mistakes of that boys’ network” had been exposed.
Referring to Mandelson’s history within the party, Eshalomi asked: “Would a woman who had been sacked twice still get appointed, still get an important job? As women, we are not afforded that.”
Speaking before the Women’s PLP meeting on Wednesday, Eshalomi said she would go along with “an open mind to listen to what [Starmer] has to say.”
Labour MP Emily Darlington, who is a campaigner for equality for women in Parliament, told PoliticsHome that the Epstein case had revealed “a culture around the rich and powerful men that get protected”, adding, “the closed men’s spaces in politics continue”.
“It controls who is promoted, who is put in place, and who has power within those networks. We are seeing those two scenarios, both of those things coming together.”
Labour women are also frustrated because the Mandelson scandal and subsequent debate about a boys’ club come at the same time as the government is bringing out a strategy for tackling violence against women and girls (VAWG).
“In terms of the trust of women and girls up and down the country, we want them to believe us when we say it is a key priority for the government. It will fall on us as women parliamentarians to repair that [trust], said Eshalomi, the MP for Vauxhall and Camberwell Green.
Darlingon, the MP for Milton Keynes Central, said she wanted to see the PM and the government talk about VAWG more going forward.
“I would love to see him [Starmer] talking about this more, and this would be a good thing to come out of this scandal, especially for the victims of the biggest grooming and trafficking scandal of our age,” she told PoliticsHome.
Politics
Putin Aide Says Trump Breached Ukraine ‘Agreement’
Vladimir Putin’s most senior diplomat has accused Donald Trump of breaching Russia and America’s “Anchorage agreement” over Ukraine.
The US president rolled out the red carpet for his counterpart last August by welcoming him to a one-on-one summit in the Alaskan city.
According to Trump, the meeting was “extremely productive”, even though it did not appear to produce any concrete results.
The US president said at the time they had a “very good chance” of a ceasefire at some point and that there were “many, many points that we agreed on” without offering any further details.
Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov has suggested the two leaders struck an “Anchorage agreement” where both countries decided Ukraine would surrender the whole of the Donbas region without resistance.
This has been a long-standing demand from the Kremlin, though Ukraine has refused to support it only saying a demilitarised zone could be considered instead.
But, speaking to Russian TV BRICS this week, Lavrov claimed the White House was refusing to implement their deal and was prioritising a policy of “economy domination” instead.
Lavrov said: “They tell us that the Ukrainian issue needs to be resolved. In Anchorage, we accepted the proposal of the US. They made an offer, we agreed and the problems should have been resolved.
“It seems that they proposed it and we were ready – and now they are not.”
The US has not ever confirmed the existence of such an agreement.
Until now the Kremlin has widely avoided criticising the Trump administration, which has been much softer on Russia than any other powers in the West.
But Lavrov went so far as to accuse the States of pursuing an anti-Russia policy this week, referring to the new sanctions the West has slapped on the country.
In a separate interview with state-owned NTV, the top Russian diplomat also poured cold water on the idea that the ongoing trilateral talks with Russia, Ukraine and the US in the UAE were going well.
While Trump insisted peace is “closer than ever before”, Lavrov cautioned against being too optimistic.
He said there was “some kind of enthusiastic perception of what is happening” which should not be embraced, adding: “Negotiations are continuing… there is still a long way to go”.
“All of this would be very good if we want to achieve peace, but we are not there yet,” the diplomat said.
Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelenskyy is expected to share plans for a presidential election and a referendum on a potential peace deal, later this month, exactly four years after Putin launched his invasion.
The Trump administration has been echoing baseless Kremlin claims that Zelenskyy is a dictator, having stayed in his post past his term end – even though wartime laws usually prevent elections.
The Ukrainian president also claimed that the US wants to end the war before the start of summer, though the US ambassador to Nato Matthew Whitaker rejected that claim.
“That June deadline was mentioned by President Zelenskyy. I don’t think that is anything that the United States has put out there. We’d like it sooner rather than later,” he said.
The US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent confirmed at the start of the month that the US will choose whether to slap additional sanctions on Russia based on the progress in the peace talks.
Politics
Louis Theroux Breaks Silence On Fall-Out From Bob Vylan Interview
Admitting that it was “painful to lose a sponsor”, Louis stood by the interview, claiming: “That’s what I do. That’s my unique place in the British broadcasting landscape. I’m willing to have difficult conversations and long may it continue.”
He continued: “The interview went out a couple of days after [a terrorist incident outside a synagogue in Manchester on the holy day of Yom Kippur], and there’s a lot of fear that’s real, and I want to acknowledge that.
“At the same time I’m very proud of how we handled the interview and how we did it. But I don’t want to minimise the feelings that are going on.”
He told his X followers: “I went on the podcast and as hard as the lobby groups and media tried, they couldn’t twist anything I said. So they have resorted to lobbying for Louis’ sponsorship to be pulled in an attempt to scare others out of giving me a platform.”
Politics
Majority Of Brits Want Keir Starmer To Resign Over Mandelson Scandal
A majority of Brits believe Keir Starmer should resign over the Peter Mandelson scandal, a new poll has found.
The survey, by Public First for Politico, found that 52% think the prime minister should take responsibility for making the disgraced former peer the UK’s ambassador to Washington a year ago.
Starmer sacked Mandelson after just seven months in the post over his links to convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epstein.
Mandelson is now under police investigation over allegations he sent market sensitive information to the billionaire financier while he was business secretary in the wake of the global financial crash.
Morgan McSweeney quit as No.10 chief of staff on Sunday, saying he was taking responsibility for advising the PM to make Mandelson ambassador.
But the new poll found that the public do not believe his departure from Downing Street is enough.
While 52% think Starmer should go, just 19% think his advisers should quit rather than the prime minister.
Only 15% of voters believe no one needs to resign over the affair.
The findings are a further blow for the PM, who has faced the biggest crisis of his premiership in recent days.
Scottish Labour leader Anas Sarwar broke ranks to publicly call on Starmer to resign on Monday.
However, No.10 was able to persuade every member of the cabinet, as well as other senior Labour figures including Angela Rayner and London mayor Sadiq Khan, to pledge their loyalty to the PM.
Speaking on Tuesday, Starmer insisted he “will never walk away” from Downing Street.
He said: “There are some people in recent days who say the Labour government should have a different fight, a fight with itself, instead of a fight for the millions of people who need us to fight for them.
“And I say to them – I will never walk away from the mandate I was given to change this country, I will never walk away from the people that I’m charged with fighting for, I will never walk away from the country that I love.”
Politics
Bad Bunny Super Bowl Director Explains Tree Costumes During Show
The creative director behind Bad Bunny’s Super Bowl performance is lifting the lid on how one of his halftime show’s most talked-about details came to be.
In a new interview with Variety, creative director Harriet Cuddeford explained that this came about when the NFL wouldn’t grant Bad Bunny’s team permission to use the 25 carts that would have been necessary to bring their plans to life on the field.
Their solution, apparently, was to ditch a lot of their intended foliage in place of around 380 costumed background artists.
Cuddeford admitted: “That solution of making the plant people, and then the plant people getting on and off in time, plus all the sets and all the performers – it was audacious in every direction. There were over 330 actual cast performers in addition to the plant people. It was just huge.”
She also shared: “There’s just so many variables in live TV. Even the weather. It was on a real grass field, and there’s no roof. We had to have backup rain plans.
“There were so many things that could have caused an issue. But it just kind of almost flawlessly unfolded before our eyes. We were all just like, ‘Wow, it worked!’.”
Politics
The House | Lib Dem MP Pippa Heylings: “Reform Wants People To Go Down The Mines Again”

Pippa Heylings MP (Photography by Dinendra Haria)
8 min read
Liberal Democrat net-zero lead Pippa Heylings tells Noah Vickers the Tories have made a serious tactical error in resiling from action on climate change
As Nigel Farage kindly undertakes a thorough “spring cleaning” for the Conservatives, with the offer of a home for unhappy MPs, Kemi Badenoch’s right flank is falling away. She has not, however, changed tack to lean into her more centrist base.
With the Tories now opposed to their own 2050 net-zero target, the Liberal Democrats believe Badenoch is making a mistake – one they are happy to exploit.
Ed Davey’s party gained 60 seats from the Tories at the last election, mostly in rural and suburban areas across the south of England, and at the heart of their campaign was anger over sewage being discharged by water companies into rivers and seas.
According to Pippa Heylings, the Lib Dems’ energy spokesperson, turning the Conservatives further away from net-zero action will help her party “solidify” its grip on those formerly Conservative seats.
The 61-year-old MP for South Cambridgeshire points to polling from More in Common, which last year showed that around 25 per cent of those who voted Lib Dem consider ‘climate change and the environment’ to be one of the top issues facing the country – almost twice the proportion of the public as a whole.
“At the moment, you’ve got Reform, who are weaponising concerns around net-zero”, she says, and “the Conservatives recklessly rowing back on the very infrastructure they created to tackle climate change, which is the Climate Change Act”.
Many of the Tory MPs who now claim that the UK’s 2050 net-zero target is causing damage to the economy – like shadow cabinet member Andrew Bowie – were the same people who helped enshrine the goal into law in 2019.
“Andrew Bowie was Theresa May’s private secretary when that happened,” Heylings points out. “I can’t understand the cognitive dissonance of that – except pure politics.”
Badenoch and Farage, she says, are fighting over a relatively small minority of voters who are opposed to the net-zero target.
The result? Lib Dems will find it easier to hold and gain seats.
“I think they’re underestimating the appetite for more on climate change,” she says of the Conservatives and Reform. “Our polling, consistently, is showing that. Energy companies are doing this polling as well, and they’re finding exactly the same.”
Voters in her constituency, she insists, “really worry” about global warming, and tell her so on the doorstep.
“What they say is: ‘I really want to know that we’re handing on a better world, because it’s a scary world now, and I want to hand on a better world to the next generation’.”
Speaking at last year’s Lib Dem conference, Heylings pledged that her party would take on “the myths being peddled” about net-zero by parties on the right. But are they doing that forcefully enough?
“We can always do better,” she admits. “We’ve got to find the cut-through in the media to hear us, but in the Chamber, time after time – if you just look at what the Lib Dems are doing – we are constantly challenging that.”
When Richard Tice chucks out his “net-stupid zero” phrase, Heylings counters it with “fracking stupid Reform”.
“Reform wants people to go down the pits again,” she argues. “They want them to go down the mines again. This is not going forwards.”
What does Heylings make of Energy Secretary Ed Miliband?
“I think he’s doing very well,” she says, particularly delighted by news that the UK has joined nine other European countries in accelerating the rollout of windfarms in the North Sea, which will be internationally linked via interconnector cables.
“We are actually looking at a collective offshore wind target that will power millions and millions of homes and will drive the costs down. To me, this is just absolutely brilliant.”
Her “one concern” is that amid such heavy focus on energy security, Miliband and his department are not paying anywhere near enough attention to the net-zero half of his brief.
“That’s why we brought forward the Climate and Nature Bill,” she says, referring to a Private Members’ Bill that the government refused to back. “We have to be looking at adaptation and resilience as well. How communities – and the environment that we’re in – can be resilient to the climate shocks we can no longer avoid.”
For Heylings, Labour’s most damaging move since taking office has been its decision to put nature against growth. Ministers have suggested there is a binary choice between, for example, protecting newts and getting homes built.
It is a “lazy” approach, she says. “You can do both growth and nature recovery. We’ve proven it. It’s what I’m dedicating my life to – that balance.”
The MP, a previous planning committee chair on her local council, adds: “I’ve worked with developers, and I know that if you get the rules clear, you’ve got policy certainty, they will absorb that need.”
Prior to her involvement in politics, Heylings worked internationally with NGOs, governments and charities, including eight years in East Africa and 15 years in Latin America and the Caribbean. In that time, she served as a policy adviser to the UK’s international climate policy programme, supported governments at global COP summits and played a key role in the creation of the Galapagos Islands Marine Reserve.
“It completely changed my outlook on the world,” she recalls. “On the interdependency of society, prosperity and natural resources. That was because I was seeing it at levels where people were living on the edge – literally, in terms of poverty.
“Climate change was already impacting those communities, so you could see immediately the impact of resource scarcity throwing whole communities into desperate situations.”
When she returned to the UK in 2012, she joined the Green Party, having been inspired by their manifesto for youth. After a couple of years, she found herself put off by the party’s anti-markets stance.
“I know that we need disruption, entrepreneurialism, innovation – we need the markets, in a regulated way. That’s what I found with the Lib Dems. I found governable policy.”
Since Zack Polanski’s election as leader, the Greens have overtaken the Lib Dems in national opinion polls, leaving her party trailing in fifth place. Does Heylings see Polanski as a threat to the Lib Dems’ ability to attract environmentally minded voters?
“What is needed right now is for the voices across all parties to be as strong as possible, to bring us back to the need to tackle the climate and environment crisis,” she replies. “So it’s good, for me, that there are loud Green Party voices as well and that they’re getting airtime.”
She appears similarly relaxed when asked why the Lib Dems are failing to make more progress of their own in the polls.
“Last year we had our best local elections and we beat – for the first time ever – both Conservatives and Labour in terms of the number of seats we won,” she says, adding that the party has continued to score impressively in council by-elections since then. “When you actually put ballots in boxes, people are choosing us.”
Yet there is clearly debate amongst the party’s MPs as to whether a wider policy prospectus and stronger messaging is needed.
One of Heylings’ disgruntled colleagues recently told The Guardian that Davey and his team must “move with significant pace towards the development of a national story for the party to tell”. Are they right about that?
“I don’t support anybody talking outside the party in that way,” says Heylings. “I think, like every party, we are internally working on that. There may be colleagues who want to work at a faster pace, but we are working on it.”
While she sees anonymous briefings to the media as unhelpful, Heylings insists she is “absolutely” in favour of an internal debate about what the national narrative should be, adding: “I want that to be as live and robust as possible – and we’re having it.”
Another reported complaint among her colleagues is that the Lib Dems lack a “big retail offer on the economy”. Does the party have one of those?
“It’s coming,” she whispers. “You will see the beginnings of that at the spring conference.”
She tells The House that this offer will “help define and differentiate us”, while also relating to her brief around climate and energy costs.
With that work under way, the MP goes so far as to claim it is possible that the Lib Dems could become Britain’s next official opposition.
“I’m very ambitious. I’m ambitious in terms of: we want to be the next official opposition. Absolutely.”
Some might say, given how the Lib Dems are currently polling, she sounds worryingly similar here to 2019-era Jo “next PM” Swinson. Does Heylings really believe that is doable? “Yes,” she replies.
“We are listening very hard right now. You can’t just go in and say, ‘This is what we’ll do’. We’re listening very hard to know, in the seats that we want to win, what else do we need to be offering, and how do we need to be offering it. You will be hearing from us.”
Politics
Politics Home Article | Will the Warm Homes Plan deliver for rural communities?

The much anticipated Warm Homes Plan was finally revealed by the government last month.
The Warm Homes Plan (WHP) shifts from a ‘fabric first’ towards a ‘heat pump first’ approach. Combined with the decision to end the Energy Company Obligation, which had a fabric-first approach, more homeowners will be encouraged to install low–carbon heating technologies.
But, are the right technologies being supported, and will rural households have access to the support needed to decarbonise their heating fairly and affordably?
While heat pumps will undoubtedly play an important role in many homes, there is no single solution that fits the diverse realities of the UK’s rural housing stock. Many rural homes are older, harder‑to‑treat, and face significant challenges with insulation, electricity supply, and installation. For these households, which often face higher levels of fuel poverty, mandating only electric solutions risks imposing high upfront and running costs, substantial disruption, and, ultimately, limited consumer uptake.
For rural MPs, the WHP must be read alongside the consultation on Exploring the Role of Alternative Clean Heating Solutions which closes on 10th February. This seeks to identify alternatives for the estimated 20 per cent of homes the government recognises might not be suitable for heat pumps.
Calor welcomes the government’s ambition and the principle of universal access outlined in the WHP. However, the plan lacks a strategic approach for rural homes as many of the technologies currently supported might not be suitable, locking them out of schemes. Fairness and consumer choice for rural households must sit at the heart of policy design.
This means ensuring that Renewable Liquid Gases (RLGs) – such as BioLPG – are fully taken forward in the government’s heat strategy.
BioLPG is already available in the UK and is fully compatible with existing heating systems, and can cut carbon emissions immediately. BioLPG, offers up to 90 per cent carbon savings compared to conventional LPG, while producing dramatically lower particulate and NOx emissions than heating oil.
Heat pumps can cost upwards of £12,000 to install in off‑grid homes, even before fabric improvements are considered. The bill for some homes can be considerably higher. In contrast, switching to BioLPG requires no disruption, protects consumer choice, and ensures a just transition for households that cannot easily electrify.
The consultation rightly acknowledges the potential of renewable liquid fuels. An ambitious and well‑designed Renewable Liquid Heating Fuel Obligation, similar to that already deployed in the transport sector, would unlock investment, give certainty to producers, and accelerate supply of RLGs at scale. It is vital the government continues its dialogue with industry to bring forward an obligation as this would enable rural households to transition quickly and affordably.
As the UK shapes its future heat policy, the priority must be a pragmatic, consumer‑led pathway that delivers emissions reduction while safeguarding rural communities. Heat pumps have an important role to play, but they are not the only answer. RLGs present a ready‑made, cost‑effective and low‑carbon solution that can work alongside electrification – not in competition with it.
If the WHP is to properly deliver for rural communities, RLGs like BioLPG must be given the full policy recognition they deserve.
Politics
Politics Home Article | Unlocking jobs and developing skills with nuclear decommissioning

NDA group apprentices attend the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Apprenticeships Parliamentary Fair.
5 min read
Skills in the nuclear sector have been high on the agenda across Westminster in recent weeks, with several successful events highlighting how future talent in nuclear is vital to the UK’s economic ambitions. During National Apprenticeship Week, the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) group is putting a spotlight on the value of early careers in unlocking talent and growth.
Over the past month, the NDA group has played a central role at two key events in Parliament, the NIA’s Nuclear Week in Parliament, and the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Apprenticeships Parliamentary Fair.
Both events were an opportunity to showcase the nuclear industry’s contribution to jobs, growth and energy security across the UK, and engage with parliamentarians and industry figures.
The NDA group, responsible for safely decommissioning the nation’s earliest nuclear sites, played a prominent role in demonstrating how decommissioning is not the end of the nuclear story, but a vital enabler of the UK’s wider nuclear ambitions.
From securing legacy facilities and safely managing nuclear waste, through to unlocking opportunities to restore land for future beneficial use, the group is increasingly trusted to do more. In the coming years, this will also include taking on decommissioning of the UK’s seven Advanced Gas-cooled Reactor stations following defueling, reflecting the breadth of expertise within the group.
The NDA group, comprising Sellafield Ltd, Nuclear Restoration Services (NRS), Nuclear Waste Services (NWS), and Nuclear Transport Solutions (NTS), oversees one of the world’s most important environmental restoration programmes. It employs 19,000 people directly – equating to 32% of the UK’s civil nuclear sector – and supports over 40,000 more jobs through its supply chain, making it central to unlocking further economic growth.
Alongside the development of the existing workforce and bringing in experienced professionals with transferable skills from other sectors, key to sustaining progress in both decommissioning and the wider civil nuclear sector is the prioritisation of early careers. As the UK nuclear workforce is set to expand, sector-wide collaboration through the National Nuclear Skills Plan has underpinned this, with NDA subsidiary Energus providing graduates and apprentices to partner organisations.
The NDA group is currently marking National Apprenticeship Week, celebrating how apprenticeships deliver long-term skills, rewarding career routes and opportunity for communities surrounding NDA sites.
At the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Apprenticeships Parliamentary Fair, NDA group apprentices shared their journeys with parliamentarians. Grace Ormesher-Southall, a fourth-year Sellafield Design Degree Apprentice, spoke highly of her time at Sellafield, saying: “I’ve had the opportunity to complete work across civil engineering, structural calculations, architectural work, project management, and CAD design.” She also reflected that she has “enjoyed playing an active role in delivering complex projects that contribute directly to Sellafield’s mission”, sentiment shared by graduates across the organisation.
With 90% of NDA group apprentices successfully securing a role within the group at the end of their scheme, apprentices are well placed to go on and work in the sector, building skills and industry in their local communities and unlocking the growth this brings.
There are also 400 apprentices set to join the group this year, who will continue to play a crucial role in delivering the NDA’s mission on behalf of the UK.
Nationally, the number of those beginning their apprenticeship schemes has risen by nearly 8% this year, driven by increases in government funding and a growing number of roles.
Minister for Skills, Baroness Jacqui Smith, said:
“Nuclear decommissioning is creating exactly the kind of skilled, well-paid careers we need more of in this country – and these jobs are being built in communities that have long been the backbone of British industry.
“This government is investing in the workforce of the future to give employers greater flexibility to train the next generation.
“By supporting high-quality apprenticeships and skills programmes, we are helping people into good jobs while strengthening the industries our economy depends on.”
Early careers were also front and centre at Nuclear Week in Parliament’s Skills and Apprenticeships Fair, hosted by Lizzi Collinge MP in January. At the event, 11 NDA group apprentices from sites across the UK again engaged with MPs to share first-hand the work they are delivering, and the skills they are gaining from their participation in the NDA group’s extensive apprenticeship programme.
Speaking at the event, Keely Salter, an NRS Health Physics Apprentice and the National Skills Academy for Nuclear (NSAN) Apprentice of the Year 2025, said her apprenticeship had helped her develop key skills to advance her career “through learning from experienced members of the team and other on‑site staff.” She added that an apprenticeship was “an environment where learning never stops” – something she hopes to share with others in her work promoting nuclear industry opportunities to local schools.
Keely is one of 1,100 apprentices and graduates currently working within the NDA group, which sees investment into such programmes as central to the delivery of its mission. With £55 million of investment into early careers each year, the group is helping grow a nuclear workforce to enable the government’s ambitions for cheap, clean, homegrown energy. In addition to early careers programmes, the NDA sponsors 150 PhD students and five post-doctoral researchers, developing advanced skills to tackle its unique and complex engineering and environmental challenges.
For more information on apprenticeships in the NDA group, visit: Early careers – The NDA group
Politics
10 Boring But Useful Buys To Help Keep You Dry In All This Rain
We hope you love the products we recommend! All of them were independently selected by our editors. Just so you know, HuffPost UK may collect a share of sales or other compensation from the links on this page if you decide to shop from them. Oh, and FYI – prices are accurate and items in stock as of time of publication.
When it rains, it pours, as they say – and this February, it looks like there’s going to be a fair amount of pouring.
With rain expected most of this month (at the time of writing), the outlook is looking pretty dreary for the next few weeks – but fear not, there are things you can certainly do (and buy) to help make it feel a lot less miserable.
From water-repelling bags to wellies to waterproof parkas, here are some of the best, if not most exciting, buys to help you brave the elements and stay comfortably dry in this terribly British weather….
-
Politics3 days agoWhy Israel is blocking foreign journalists from entering
-
NewsBeat2 days agoMia Brookes misses out on Winter Olympics medal in snowboard big air
-
Sports4 days agoJD Vance booed as Team USA enters Winter Olympics opening ceremony
-
Business3 days agoLLP registrations cross 10,000 mark for first time in Jan
-
Tech5 days agoFirst multi-coronavirus vaccine enters human testing, built on UW Medicine technology
-
Tech6 hours agoSpaceX’s mighty Starship rocket enters final testing for 12th flight
-
NewsBeat2 days agoWinter Olympics 2026: Team GB’s Mia Brookes through to snowboard big air final, and curling pair beat Italy
-
Sports2 days agoBenjamin Karl strips clothes celebrating snowboard gold medal at Olympics
-
Politics3 days agoThe Health Dangers Of Browning Your Food
-
Sports4 days ago
Former Viking Enters Hall of Fame
-
Sports5 days ago
New and Huge Defender Enter Vikings’ Mock Draft Orbit
-
Business3 days agoJulius Baer CEO calls for Swiss public register of rogue bankers to protect reputation
-
NewsBeat5 days agoSavannah Guthrie’s mother’s blood was found on porch of home, police confirm as search enters sixth day: Live
-
Business6 days agoQuiz enters administration for third time
-
Crypto World17 hours agoBlockchain.com wins UK registration nearly four years after abandoning FCA process
-
Crypto World1 day agoU.S. BTC ETFs register back-to-back inflows for first time in a month
-
NewsBeat2 days agoResidents say city high street with ‘boarded up’ shops ‘could be better’
-
Sports2 days ago
Kirk Cousins Officially Enters the Vikings’ Offseason Puzzle
-
Crypto World1 day agoEthereum Enters Capitulation Zone as MVRV Turns Negative: Bottom Near?
-
NewsBeat6 days agoStill time to enter Bolton News’ Best Hairdresser 2026 competition
