Day 1 of the BMPS 2026 Grand Finals is officially in the books, and what a day it was. From back-to-back chicken dinners by iQOO Reckoning Esports to Divine Gaming’s late surge to the top of the standings, the opening six matches had everything BGMI fans could ask for. While some fan favorites lived up to expectations, others will be heading into Day 2 with plenty of work left to do.

Reckoning Starts Strong With Back-to-Back Chicken Dinners

The opening match on Rondo immediately set the tone for the day. Team TAG endured a rough start after losing multiple players to Revenant XSpark and eventually became the first team eliminated from the Grand Finals. Meanwhile, iQOO SouL looked sharp early on, picking up multiple eliminations and showing signs of a strong opening. However, it was iQOO Reckoning Esports who stole the spotlight, closing out the match to secure the first chicken dinner of the Grand Finals.

The momentum continued into Match 2 on Erangel. While the early game remained relatively quiet, the action exploded during the final circles around Ferry Pier. Teams like GodLike, Divine Gaming, and Nebula Esports all looked dangerous throughout the match. The final battle came down to Nebula Esports, Genesis Esports, iQOO 8Bit, and Reckoning Esports. Despite Nebula’s strong positioning, 8Bit disrupted their plans, while Genesis Fury put together an impressive individual performance from a watchtower. In the end, Reckoning Esports emerged victorious again, securing back-to-back chicken dinners and establishing themselves as the early favorites.

Erangel Delivers Upsets and Surprises

The third match brought one of the biggest surprises of the day. After winning the first two games, Reckoning Esports became one of the earliest teams eliminated. Genesis and GodLike continued their strong performances throughout the mid-game, while teams like TAG and SouL once again struggled to convert opportunities into points. The final fight saw Gods Esports and iQOO Orangutan battle for the chicken dinner. Orangutan’s lone survivor attempted a clever smoke rotation to outplay the opposition, but the strategy fell short, allowing Gods Esports to claim the victory.

The fourth match finally delivered the military island zone that many fans had been waiting for. Unfortunately for iQOO 8Bit, their game ended before the first circle had even closed. The standout performer here was Nebula Esports. The team secured prime positioning near the center of the zone and successfully defended it against multiple challenges.

Vasista Esports tried to break through but were quickly shut down. As the match entered its closing stages, only Nebula, Orangutan, and Reckoning remained. With Nebula holding a full squad while their rivals were reduced to single players, the outcome felt inevitable. Nebula secured the chicken dinner and, more importantly, climbed into contention for the top spot overall.

Divine Gaming Turns Things Around in Miramar

If the first half belonged to Reckoning and Nebula, the Miramar matches belonged to Divine Gaming. The fifth match featured a relatively central circle, resulting in fewer risky rotations and more direct engagements. Vasista became the first team eliminated after losing a crucial fight against Revenant XSpark. GodLike once again showed flashes of brilliance, winning multiple engagements through well-timed grenades and coordinated pushes. However, they couldn’t sustain the momentum deep into the game. The final showdown came down to Genesis Esports and Divine Gaming. Despite Genesis holding the high ground, Divine managed to outplay them during a tense 3v3 battle and walked away with the chicken dinner.

The final match of the day saw another Miramar zone centered around the southwest side of El Azahar. Once again, TAG found themselves involved in multiple early-game fights, including a lengthy standoff with Gods Reign and Team Tamilas inside a church compound. While TAG picked up a few eliminations, they couldn’t capitalize on the momentum and were eventually eliminated while rotating into the safe zone. SouL’s struggles also continued. The team spent most of the match fighting from a disadvantaged position and eventually exited with just a single elimination. Genesis continued their impressive run by taking down both iQOO 8Bit and Orangutan in consecutive engagements. However, they were unable to convert that momentum into a chicken dinner.

The final battle featured Divine Gaming and Revenant XSpark. Unlike previous endgames, Divine entered the fight with all four players alive and full control of the circle. Revenant attempted to mount a challenge but simply couldn’t break through Divine’s setup. Divine Gaming secured the final chicken dinner of Day 1 and, with it, the overall lead in the standings.

If Day 1 was any indication, fans are in for another action-packed weekend of BGMI esports.

from the total-capitulation dept

If there’s one thing that Donald Trump has shown over the years, it’s that he will get his most sycophantic MAGA loyalists to insist there are perfectly obvious reasons why whatever he’s about to do is absolutely necessary… and then Trump will do the opposite, and all those hangers-on will magically change their story within minutes.

The excellent reporter Laura Jedeed has been tracking all of the excuses Trump and his team have been giving for why we absolutely had to go to war with Iran, and the very top one: eliminate their ballistic missile capability. Next: eliminate their nuclear program entirely. There was also some talk of “regime change.”

Now that Trump has signed the surrender agreement at Versailles (the traditional place to sign a total surrender agreement), the scorecard looks like this: no eliminated missile program, no eliminated nuclear program, no regime change. Also: no actual deal.

What Trump signed is a one-page memorandum of understanding with a 60-day time limit. After that, another deal needs to happen — one that may or may not actually get signed. The thing being called a historic peace agreement is, in legal terms, a note on the back of a napkin that expires in two months.

With that established: here’s what he gave away to get it.

The US backed down on everything to get the Strait of Hormuz only partially opened, in a situation where Iran still seems likely to come out of this way stronger and way more powerful than before Trump started this illegal war. Remember, before this war, the Strait was open. So with this deal we only get partially back to where things were before the war, but with a huge draw down of US military stock, over a dozen dead US soldiers, and tons of unnecessary Iranian casualties, including a school full of young girls.

Iran retains their ballistic missiles and MAGA officials have to pretend that makes sense.

And after months of screaming about how Iran could not retain any nuclear capabilities at all, Trump is now talking about how important it is for them to retain their nuclear capabilities.

Also, remember how the Trump world insisted that Obama’s JCPOA was one of the worst deals of all time?

That’s Donald Trump tweeting in 2015 about the JCPOA:

The deal with Iran will go down as one of the most incompetent ever made. The U.S. lost on virtually every point. We just don’t win anymore!

The “deal” Trump just made is a complete capitulation, a loss on every point, and way, way, way worse than what was in the JCPOA, which, in retrospect, was a genuinely good deal — carefully negotiated by actual experts — and briefly a real win for peace in the Middle East before Trump tore it up.

And remember how MAGA spent years misleadingly talking up all the money that the US supposedly “gave” Iran with the JCPOA? Or the deal Biden did to extend a Trump-era policy to unfreeze some of Iran’s frozen assets, which even Donald Trump Jr. falsely claimed was Biden “giving” Iran money?

There is now widespread reporting that this deal will unlock some $300 billion in investment for Tehran. To be precise: this isn’t the US writing a check — the deal creates the conditions for private capital to pour into the country. Trump has been pretty candid about his view on that:

“We don’t have to give them anything. But some people may want to invest. Like, what are you going to do to say ‘you can never ever invest in a country,’ I mean, it’s pretty tough.”

So: MAGA spent years insisting that financial flows to Iran — even unfreezing Iran’s own assets — would fund its military and get soldiers killed. Trump just opened Iran to hundreds of billions in new investment while leaving both the missiles and the nuclear program intact. The threat, apparently, only counts when a Democrat is president.

Obviously, ending this war is a good thing. But it never should have happened in the first place. Trump launched it without congressional authorization, in clear violation of the War Powers Act — and once it started, Congress should have stopped it cold.

The final accounting: Trump tore up the JCPOA, which he called “one of the most incompetent deals ever made.” He started an illegal war. He drew down US military stockpiles, lost over a dozen American soldiers, and killed Iranian civilians — including a school full of young girls. And he came away with a memorandum of understanding that expires in 60 days, leaving Iran with everything it had before the war started, plus full knowledge of exactly how hard Trump will push before he folds.

Trump’s own verdict on the JCPOA was: “The U.S. lost on virtually every point.” He was describing this deal.

Filed Under: donald trump, iran, iran deal, jcpoa

Two sides desperately needing a victory meet at the FIFA World Cup 2026 as Turkey face Paraguay, and you can live stream the game around the world for free.

Turkey are reeling from a shock 2-0 defeat by Australia in their opening Group D match, as the pre-tournament dark horses were left to rue some sloppy defensive play and a lack of cutting edge. Head coach Vincenzo Montella will look to rectify that against Paraguay in what already looks like a must-win game, with co-hosts USA still to come. It won’t be ideal for Montella that Turkey’s first two group matches are 1,500km apart, and the appropriately nicknamed Little Airplane will hope the journey from Vancouver to San Francisco does not take too much toll on his players. He also needs Real Madrid playmaker Arda Guler to step up.

from the good-deals-on-cool-stuff dept

The JavaScript DOM Game Developer Bundle has 8 courses to help you master coding fundamentals. Courses cover JavaScript DOM, Coding, HTML 5 Canvas, and more. You’ll learn how to create your own fun, interactive games. It’s on sale for $30.

Note: The Techdirt Deals Store is powered and curated by StackCommerce. A portion of all sales from Techdirt Deals helps support Techdirt. The products featured do not reflect endorsements by our editorial team.

Filed Under: daily deal

Day 1 of the BMPS Grand Finals got us some really exciting action from teams we didn’t expect much from. Table toppers like Divine and Nebula have solidified their place, but day two of any BGMI tournament is always for comebacks, meaning we could see SouL and GodLike mounting a big challenge. After all, a ticket to the esports world cup in Paris is on the cards, in addition to the 4 cr prize pool. Here’s what the schedule looks like for day two.

BMPS 2026 Grand Finals Day 1 Schedule & Timing

The live broadcast will begin at 2:45 PM IST. Fans can catch the games like on Krafton’s YouTube channel in Hindi, English, and a few other regional languages. Or, if you want to support your team live, head over to the Jaipur Convention Center. Tickets are available on the District app. Maps for today will include:

• Match 1 — Rondo
• Match 2 — Erangel
• Match 3 — Erangel
• Match 4 — Erangel
• Match 5 — Miramar
• Match 6 — Miramar

A total of 18 matches will be played over the course of this weekend. And the format is pretty simple. Points are awarded for each finish, and also for how long a team survives. In the end, the team with the most total points (position + finish) will be the winners.

BMPS Grand Finals Qualified Teams

OFFBEAT

Nearly 4,000 vehicles recalled for driving past closure warnings and between cones marking shut lanes

Waymo is recalling nearly 4,000 robotaxis after its vehicles repeatedly failed to recognize freeway construction zones, in some cases driving past closure signs or between cones marking closed lanes.

A total of 3,871 vehicles equipped with Waymo’s fifth-generation Automated Driving System (ADS) are affected, and the interim workaround is to restrict freeway driving until a fix is available.

Six events were logged in Phoenix, Arizona, in April, during which vehicles drove past ramp-closure signs into pre-planned freeway construction zones. The response of Waymo’s Field Safety Committee was to implement freeway driving restrictions.

There were seven incidents in May in the San Francisco Bay Area, where vehicles drove between cones designating a lane closure. According to the Safety Recall Report, this was “due to the ADS inappropriately prioritizing the avoidance of other freeway hazards and/or failing to recognize the construction zone.”

The response was further freeway driving restrictions until the company could get to the bottom of the problem. On June 8, Waymo’s Safety Board decided to conduct a recall.

Vehicles not capable of driverless operation on freeways are not affected and have not been recalled.

The recall comes a month after Waymo disclosed that flooding could confuse its vehicles on high-speed roads, prompting another software fix.

Waymo’s vehicles operate in several US cities and have recently been sighted on the streets of London, albeit with a human ready to take control if needed.

Waymo has issued several vehicle recalls over the years. There was the 2023 truck collision and a prang involving a pole in 2024. Neither was particularly serious, but did little to bolster public confidence.

In January 2026, a Waymo vehicle struck a child near an elementary school. According to the US National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) [PDF], “the child ran across the street from behind a double-parked SUV towards the school and was struck by the Waymo AV. Waymo reported that the child sustained minor injuries.”

According to Waymo, its vehicles cover more than four million fully autonomous miles each week and have logged more than 170 million in total. The company says the Waymo ADS was involved in “92 percent fewer crashes that cause serious or fatal injuries than human drivers in the same driving conditions.” ®

TL;DR: More than a decade after its original release, Dark Souls II is set to receive a significant fan-made multiplayer update. A modder is currently working on a new “seamless” co-op mode that would theoretically allow the game to be played from start to finish in a single, soul-crushing session.

A well-known FromSoftware modder named “Yui” is working on a new seamless co-op mode for Dark Souls II. The mod is planned for release on the Scholar of the First Sin edition, which includes all previously released DLC and several enhancements to the base game. In a recent post, Yui said the project is taking longer than expected, as Dark Souls II has proven to be a challenging reverse-engineering effort.

Initially announced in 2025, the mod is now approaching the stability required for an “alpha” testing phase. Yui confirmed that it has become one of their most complex and ambitious projects to date, noting that Dark Souls II is a very different beast compared to other FromSoftware Soulslike titles.

A seamless co-op mod is designed to let players cooperate and complete a game without the traditional restrictions of official multiplayer modes implemented by FromSoftware. In theory, up to six players could progress through the entire game in a single co-op session, persisting through death and carrying world progression with them.

The mod will require the Scholar of the First Sin edition of Dark Souls II, which is a 64-bit upgrade of the original 32-bit base game. Yui previously worked on several mods for other FromSoftware titles, including Dark Souls, Dark Souls III, Sekiro, Elden Ring, and Elden Ring: Nightreign. These games are built on a broadly similar engine architecture, making it relatively easier to understand their systems after working on any one of them.

By contrast, Dark Souls II appears to use a separate branch of FromSoftware’s proprietary engine. As a result, Yui effectively had to reverse engineer the game from scratch, which explains why development of the co-op mod has taken considerably longer than expected.

The mod is not yet complete, but Yui released a short video to announce the upcoming project and demonstrate that it is technically feasible. The developer plans to provide a test build of the mod for free, while bug reporting and support will be limited to project supporters via Patreon.

Dark Souls II was released in 2014, further expanding the “Soulsborne” formula introduced in Demon’s Souls and Dark Souls. The game was a critical and commercial success, and FromSoftware went on developing even more punishingly hard action-RPG titles until Elden Ring: Nightreign came to be. Elden Ring was so successful that they are now making a movie out of the game.

For years, security teams built their programs around a simple premise of if you control the identities, you can control the risk. Employees authenticate through identity providers. Service accounts connect systems. API keys let workloads talk to cloud services and databases.

The actors have been very predictable. And as a result, the identity security and governance model have followed that predictability. Now, this premise is breaking.

AI agents entered the enterprise quietly, summarizing meetings, drafting emails, helping employees find information. Most security teams didn’t think hard about them at first. They looked like productivity tools, because that is exactly what they were.

Then, organizations started connecting them to critical business services such as Salesforce, Snowflake, GitHub, Jira, production databases, and cloud environments. Now, they retrieve information, trigger workflows, update records, write and deploy code, and take actions across multiple systems.

Sometimes on the behalf of a human, sometimes autonomously, and sometimes in ways where it’s genuinely unclear which.

This makes AI agents more than just tools. It makes them identities and most enterprises have no security and governance models for them.

The pattern is consistent across organizations. A new identity layer gets built on top of existing infrastructure with almost none of the controls that identity teams spent the last decade putting in place. An agent might be created by one team, used by another, connected to five different applications, and running on credentials that were provisioned for a completely different purpose.

It got broad access early because someone needed it to work and didn’t want to slow things down. The result is a sprawl of high-privilege, low-visibility actors that most security teams can’t inventory, let alone govern.

According to a 2026 CSA survey commissioned by us here at Token Security, 82% of organizations discovered at least one AI agent created without the knowledge of security, IT, or governance teams in the past year, and 41% found this happening multiple times.

Here’s where the security conversation has gone sideways. Most of the attention on AI security has landed on model risk, such as prompt injection, jailbreaks, unsafe outputs. While these are all an important part of the agentic AI ecosystem, they don’t paint the complete picture enterprise security teams require. The most important piece they need must answer what can the agent actually access?

An agent that summarizes public documentation has limited blast radius. An agent connected to customer records, source code, financial systems, and admin-level cloud credentials is a different problem entirely.

A bad prompt, a compromised session, a malicious plugin, or a misconfigured integration can turn an overprivileged agent into a path for data exfiltration, destructive action, or lateral movement through systems that were never meant to be connected.

This is no longer theoretical, 65% of organizations experienced a security incident involving an AI agent in the past year, with 61% reporting exposure or mishandling of sensitive data as a result (source).

Getting control starts with visibility. Security teams need AI agent discovery and inventory that extends beyond just names and platforms to answer questions that actually matter.

Who owns this agent? Who can invoke it? What systems is it connected to? What credentials does it use? What can it read, write, delete, or execute in each target application?

This is harder than it sounds, because the surface isn’t obvious. A security team might know a sales assistant exists in an AI platform without knowing it runs on a Snowflake service account with admin privileges. They might know a coding agent is installed on developer endpoints without knowing which secrets, repositories, and CI/CD pipelines it can reach.

The agent itself is only part of the picture. Everything the agent’s identities can touch is the actual exposure surface.

The second piece is purpose. Security and governance can’t be purely permission-based with AI agents. It has to account for the agent’s intent. A sales prep agent only needs read access to CRM records. It doesn’t need to delete database tables.

A finance workflow agent should only read invoices. It shouldn’t be able to create new privileged users. When you understand what an agent is supposed to do, you can evaluate whether its permissions match that scope. And, in practice today, they rarely do and that gap is where the real risk lives and it only widens over time through least privilege policy drift.

Once intent is understood, enforcement becomes possible. Permissions can be trimmed to match the agent’s actual purpose, overprivileged service accounts remediated, unused credentials rotated or removed, and risky connections caught before they turn into incidents.

The part that trips up most teams is that none of this is a one-time exercise. An access review or an audit may feel like progress, but they just provide a point-in-time checkbox and a false sense of security. The reason is that agents change, instructions update, user bases shift, and integrations expand.

An agent that started as a narrow internal tool can quietly end up connected to systems it was never designed to touch, not because anyone made a bad decision, but because nobody was watching when the scope crept.

That’s why governance needs to be continuous to catch agents that start accessing applications outside their normal pattern, use unexpected credentials, or take actions that don’t fit their stated purpose.

The enterprises that succeed with AI will not be the ones that block agents entirely. They will be the ones that make agents governable and promote secure AI innovation. This means treating them as first-class identities with owners, access, behavior, risk, and lifecycle controls.

AI agents are becoming privileged insiders. Security and identity programs must now catch up before those insiders become invisible attack paths.

We’d love to show you how we’re tackling this at Token Security, book a demo to chat with our technical team so you can scale without sacrificing safety.

Sponsored and written by Token Security.

Back in 1991, Toyota offered something in select LiteAce minivans that still catches people off guard decades later. Between the front seats sat a console box that could chill drinks and freeze real ice cubes while the vehicle moved down the road. Most minivans from that era focused on basic space and reliability. This one added a practical touch few competitors matched.

The LiteAce was part of Toyota’s long-standing line of practical compact vans and wagons built for everyday use. In regions such as Japan and Canada, as well as earlier North American vehicles offered as the Toyota Van, purchasers wanting for a little more may choose higher grades with some extremely nice amenities. The Cool & Hot Box was a highlight in this category. It carried around 6 cans in the main compartment and had a small designated space for freezing. The package included two ice trays. Owners would fill them with water, place them in, and the rest was taken care of.

Sale

LEGO Technic Fast and Furious Toyota Supra MK4 Building Kit- Toy Car for Kids, Boys, and Girls, Ages…

• TOY CAR MODEL KIT– Boys and girls ages 9 and up create thrilling movie action by building one of the most iconic cars in movie history with the LEGO…
• FAST AND FURIOUS CAR – Fans will be delighted by the LEGO Toyota Supra sports car toy, which is packed with realistic details and authentic movie…
• ACTION-PACKED FEATURES– Builders assemble the 6-cylinder engine, steering, opening hood and removable Targa top roof, then recreate favorite Fast…

Cooling comes directly from the dual air-conditioning system that many of these vans were equipped with. The refrigerant just had to run across to the console to keep the trays cold, resulting in actual, solid ice cubes on long rides. There was no separate compressor, and it didn’t draw much electricity because it used the existing A/C system in an efficient manner. Simply turn on the climate control, as the ice maker works silently in the background. To top it off, it created frozen cubes rather than chilled air or ice from home.

An OttoEx video on the feature’s daily use shows a cleaner 1991 example. The van is equipped with a 2.0-liter 3Y gasoline engine with fuel injection, an automated transmission, and part-time four-wheel drive. It also included locking hubs and a two-speed transfer case, allowing it to navigate off-road with ease. Inside, the seating arrangement was rather simple, with eight people spread across three rows. The van had a Toyota CD player and cassette deck for audio, and rear heating was available for added comfort. The console fridge was right between the front seats, and once the air conditioner turned on, you could sense how chilly it was.

The van was rather compact, measuring approximately 4070mm in length, 1650mm in width, and 2100mm in wheelbase, making it easy to park. Height varied based on the roof design, but was typically between 1765 and 1965 millimeters. It weighed between 1270 and 1440 kg, depending on how you specified it. Toyota provided smaller 1.5- and 1.8-liter gasoline engines, as well as a 2.0-liter diesel, some of which were turbocharged. At the end of the day, the goal was to make things basic and strong so they would be easy to service for years to come.

Before the Previa, the Cool & Hot Box was mostly an option on higher-end trims, specifically Japanese market wagons and certain North American Toyota Van models. It wasn’t on every LiteAce, mind you; many purchasers chose not to have it, and it was removed from US versions when the lineup changed. However, in other places, the option remained on higher-end Previa models for a little longer. If you’re lucky enough to come across one of these vehicles with the original console intact, it’s now a true collector’s item. Some people have even managed to extract entire units from Japanese models, which now retail for a few hundred dollars when they crop up.
[Source]