Connect with us

Tech

When Machines Think, Human Thinking Must Go Higher

Published

on

Not long ago, I participated in an exercise that asked educators to define thinking and learning. It was a familiar prompt, one we have returned to countless times over the past decade.

This time felt different. The task was to triangulate, even pinpoint, what these concepts mean in today’s educational landscape.

The conversation was thoughtful and wide-ranging. Educators from varied contexts shared perspectives shaped by their classrooms, their students and their lived professional realities. As the discussion unfolded, a shared realization emerged: Our understanding of thinking and learning is becoming increasingly abstract.

As a chief academic officer, I spend much of my time thinking about how learning is designed and measured. Yet, in that moment, listening to educators wrestle with the meaning of thinking itself, I knew the challenge is no longer to define, but to work within a world where that definition is constantly shifting.

Advertisement

The Shift We Didn’t Plan For

Education has always adapted to new tools, but rarely at this pace. In a matter of months, technologies capable of summarizing texts, generating essays and mimicking academic voice have become widely accessible in classrooms. What once required sustained cognitive effort can now be produced in seconds.

The result is not merely a new instructional challenge; it is a fundamental shift in what it means to learn.

For generations, schools treated knowledge acquisition as the central hurdle. If students could read closely, recall accurately and write coherently, they were considered prepared. Tasks that once demonstrated understanding now signal access.

This does not make learning easier. It makes it different. And it forces us to confront an uncomfortable question: If machines can do much of what we once taught students to do, what should learning now require?

Advertisement

Literacy Beyond the Page

Bloom’s Taxonomy has long articulated cognitive rigor. Remembering led to understanding; understanding enabled application; application supported analysis, evaluation and creation.

But artificial intelligence is flattening that progression.

What once represented higher-order thinking — summarizing a text, drafting an essay, explaining a concept — is now executable at the push of a button. These tasks no longer serve as reliable indicators of mastery. They have become baseline capabilities within the learning environment.

Artificial intelligence does not invalidate Bloom’s premise; it reframes it. In an AI-rich world, the lower levels of the taxonomy are no longer destinations. They are starting points.

Advertisement

The true measures of learning now lie above them. Can students interpret nuance rather than extract information? Can they evaluate credibility instead of repeating content? Can they connect ideas across disciplines and explain why something matters?

These are not extensions of literacy. They are literacy redefined. In this sense, literacy is no longer merely technical. It is interpretive. Ethical. Strategic.

This kind of literacy cannot be automated. Automation can, however, support its development.

Designing for Thought, Not Just Performance

To meet this moment, we must rethink how learning experiences are designed: framing tasks that require judgment, designing assessments that foster analysis, and valuing ambiguity and intellectual risk.

Advertisement

When applied intentionally, automation through AI can strengthen, not dilute, this kind of learning. For students, its greatest value lies in responsiveness. Research shows that AI can adapt in real time, offering targeted practice when gaps emerge, enrichment when mastery is demonstrated and prompts that ask learners to explain their reasoning, compare approaches or revise claims as their thinking develops. It can also support deeper engagement through simulations, branching scenarios and feedback loops that respond to student choices without turning learning into a race for completion.

Just as important, automation can protect student focus. By reducing cognitive clutter, streamlining navigation, pacing tasks and offering timely hints, it keeps learners in productive struggle rather than frustration or disengagement.

For teachers, the benefit is leverage. Used well, AI functions as an instructional partner in the invisible work that consumes time but does not require uniquely human judgment. It can draft lesson variants, surface patterns across student work, suggest groupings and prepare concise summaries that help teachers see which students need support and why.

The result is not automation of teaching, but an expansion of a teacher’s capacity to teach well.

Advertisement

Practically, this means automating what can be standardized and continuously improved, collecting evidence of learning, tagging misconceptions, generating formative checks and organizing instructional options, while preserving teacher judgment as the final authority. The teacher always remains the editor-in-chief: approving, revising and applying professional discernment while the system does the work of noticing more and preparing faster.

This is the promise of AI in education: not accelerating answers but amplifying reflection; not replacing judgment but making room for it.

The author would like to acknowledge the support of Creatium CEO and founder, Dr. Deepak Sekar, in developing this article.


In a world where machines can read, write and summarize, literacy must mean something more demanding: the ability to interpret nuance, evaluate credibility, integrate ideas and make reasoned judgments. At Lincoln Learning Solutions, our aim is not to compete with intelligent tools, but to design experiences using those tools that strengthen students’ capacity to think critically about what they read, write and create, and to help them explain why ideas matter, how meaning is constructed and what responsible choices follow.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Tech

US Had Almost No Job Growth in 2025

Published

on

An anonymous reader shares a report: The U.S. economy experienced almost zero job growth in 2025, according to revised federal data. On a more encouraging note: hiring has picked up in 2026. Preliminary data had indicated that the U.S. economy added 584,000 jobs last year. But the Bureau of Labor Statistics revised that number after it received additional state data, and found that the labor market had added 181,000 jobs in all of 2025. This is far fewer than the 1.46 million jobs that were added in 2024.

One bright spot was last month, when hiring increased by 130,000 roles. This was significantly more than the 55,000 additions that had been expected by economists. “Job gains occurred in health care, social assistance, and construction, while federal government and financial activities lost jobs,” BLS said in a statement.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Why Diesel Fuel Is So Much Cheaper In The US Than Europe

Published

on





While most of us ride around in cars powered by gasoline, diesel discreetly powers armies of trucks and even some cars, too. Diesel, with its unique smell and the throaty engine hum it creates, never supplanted gasoline as the dominant fuel in the U.S. And contrary to what you may have heard, it is cheaper here — on the whole — compared to what Europeans pay, despite them having a much broader contingent of automobiles using it. To highlight the difference, the proportion of diesel cars on the road in the U.S. was very low at around 5 % in 2025, compared to Europe with 18 % as of 2023. This becomes apparent quickly when visiting the old world, where smaller, more fuel-efficient diesel cars pepper the landscape, navigating narrow roads and dense city centers perhaps more easily than, say, a Chevy Tahoe or Suburban

The difference in fuel price between the U.S. and Europe is largely driven by taxation, reliance on imports, and geopolitical instability. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), the current U.S. gasoline price sits at a national average of $2.87 per gallon, at the time of publishing, while diesel is priced at $3.68 per gallon. Conversely, if we consider the European numbers, we see that on average across the EU, diesel fetches $7.02 per gallon, which is roughly a 91% increase over American prices. And for comparison’s sake, we note that the average European gasoline prices work out to $7.21 per gallon.

Advertisement

An ever changing market

If we zoom in on the primary factors driving this price disparity, we see how government involvement in the price structure is at play. The U.S. is an energy powerhouse, able to refine enough diesel to meet domestic demands and even export some surplus. Conversely, due to driving culture and more widespread adoption of diesel, Europe naturally has higher demands. Historically, this led to significant reliance on Russia, with the EU having imported 40% of its diesel from the former Soviet state, pre-2023 sanctions, for example. The Union does refine the majority of its own fuel, though, and thanks to the conflict in Ukraine, its imports have shifted towards Saudi Arabia, China, South Korea, and the U.S. What’s more, taxation is higher across the EU, with diesel getting a minimum excise duty of $1.47 per gallon on average, plus a value-added tax (VAT). Meanwhile, we see roughly $0.60 of tax per gallon here, making a 223% higher tax rate for EU customers, broadly speaking.

However, as with any commodity, oil prices fluctuate widely — especially in an era fraught with so much conflict across the globe. It’s already a complex ecosystem with many levers, so we can’t assume that American diesel will always be cheaper, writ large, or lower priced in individual states when compared to specific EU nations. Take, for example when, back in 2022, California’s diesel prices hit an average of $6.03 per gallon, while Malta, with some of the lowest excise duties in the EU, was paying around $4.58 for the same amount of fuel. This highlights how generalizing cost disparities within commodity markets is fraught with caveats, thanks to taxes, refining costs, crude pricing, wars, and distribution charges.

Advertisement



Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

A Hellish ‘Hothouse Earth’ Getting Closer, Scientists Say

Published

on

The world is closer than thought to a “point of no return” after which runaway global heating cannot be stopped, scientists have said. From a report: Continued global heating could trigger climate tipping points, leading to a cascade of further tipping points and feedback loops, they said. This would lock the world into a new and hellish “hothouse Earth” climate far worse than the 2-3C temperature rise the world is on track to reach.

The climate would also be very different to the benign conditions of the past 11,000 years, during which the whole of human civilisation developed. At just 1.3C of global heating in recent years, extreme weather is already taking lives and destroying livelihoods across the globe. At 3-4C, “the economy and society will cease to function as we know it,” scientists said last week, but a hothouse Earth would be even more fiery. The public and politicians were largely unaware of the risk of passing the point of no return, the researchers said.

The group said they were issuing their warning because while rapid and immediate cuts to fossil fuel burning were challenging, reversing course was likely to be impossible once on the path to a hothouse Earth, even if emissions were eventually slashed. It was difficult to predict when climate tipping points would be triggered, making precaution vital, said Dr Christopher Wolf, a scientist at Terrestrial Ecosystems Research Associates in the US. Wolf is a member of a study team that includes Prof Johan Rockstrom at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany and Prof Hans Joachim Schellnhuber at the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis in Austria.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Conner returns with a tiny $19 Pocket Cloud offering fast backups, expandable storage, and charging all in your pocket

Published

on


  • Conner’s Pocket Cloud fits in a pocket while handling phone backups effectively
  • Dual USB-C ports allow for simultaneous charging and data transfer
  • Users can record 4K video directly to removable microSD storage

Conner, the company which has previously launched 1.8-inch, 2.5-inch, and 3.5-inch hard drives, has shifted focus to mobile storage with its new Pocket Cloud.

This device is designed to provide portable, on-the-go storage for smartphones without relying on traditional cloud subscriptions.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

‘Best of both worlds’: Seattle startup founder community Foundations is expanding to San Francisco

Published

on

An event at Seattle’s Foundations. (Foundations Photo)

Foundations, the Seattle-based founder community that operates a startup accelerator and co-working space, is opening a new location in San Francisco — extending its footprint beyond the Pacific Northwest for the first time.

The expansion is not about abandoning Seattle so much as helping Seattle founders succeed, said Aviel Ginzburg, the venture capitalist who co-founded Foundations in 2024. Ginzburg said the goal is to support Seattle-founded companies that increasingly split time between the two tech hubs, rather than to recruit Bay Area startups.

“It’s about giving our community the best of both worlds,” he wrote in a blog post. “No more choosing sides; we’re bridging the gap to empower founders wherever their journey takes them.”

The new San Francisco office, expected to open in the second quarter, is roughly 5,000 square feet — similar in size to Foundations’ original Capitol Hill location in Seattle. Foundations members will be able to use both the Seattle and San Francisco spaces.

Ginzburg framed the move as a response to shifting market dynamics, with stronger startup momentum in the Bay Area and growing hurdles for Seattle-based founders, specifically related to hiring.

Advertisement

Last week GeekWire reported on Seattle entrepreneurs who are relocating to San Francisco, drawn by the city’s AI boom and serendipitous encounters that are harder to find in Seattle.

Ginzburg said one or two Foundations member companies relocate to San Francisco every month, and teams that stay in Seattle are spending more time in the Bay Area.

“Seattle remains an incredible place for deep tech work, with its engineering depth and quality-of-life perks, but SF’s density of ambitious startups, AI innovation, and investor networks are unmatched, and the divide is growing,” Ginzburg wrote.

He told GeekWire that the move is not motivated by tax or political concerns, but acknowledged that proposed legislation in Olympia — including bills that would tax gains from qualified small business stock — “is just going to increase our headwinds.”

Advertisement

Ginzburg, a general partner at Seattle venture firm Founders’ Co-op, noted that San Francisco is not without its own drawbacks for founders. “By expanding Foundations to SF, we’re slaying the false choice,” he wrote in the blog post. “Our members get access to both ecosystems without giving up their hard-earned community of practice: Seattle’s grounded talent AND the Bay Area’s electric pace.”

He said Foundations is updating its mission from “making Seattle a better place to be a founder” to “make Seattle founders successful” — regardless of where they’re physically located.

Other Seattle-based startup groups have made similar moves in recent years. Longtime VC firm Madrona opened a Silicon Valley office in 2022. Matt McIlwain, managing director at Madrona, told GeekWire last year that having a presence in Silicon Valley “gives us some information flow, some people flow that’s highly complimentary to what we do here.”

Flying Fish, another established investment firm, also expanded its purview beyond the Pacific Northwest in 2022.

Advertisement

Foundations co-founder Tyler Brown is already based in San Francisco to help run the new office. Ginzburg said he’ll be making more trips to the Bay Area.

Meanwhile, Foundations is also adding another 5,000 square feet in Seattle at the Capitol Hill location. A plan to expand to the Eastside has been delayed.

Foundations launched two years ago as a way to support early stage founders, filling a gap left by the departure of Techstars Seattle. The group now has 290 active members, and has worked closely with 68 founders-in-residence that participate in an accelerator program and have raised more than $70 million collectively. Ginzburg recently brought on Seattle investor Peter Mueller to help run operations.

Foundations operates as a benefit corporation, a legal distinction designed for entities that want to turn a profit and also prioritize social and public good. The organization set up its business model so that it could fund operations without requiring an exchange of equity with participating entrepreneurs.

Advertisement

It’s one of several startup groups in the Seattle region aiming to help founders, including the AI2 Incubator and its AI House, Pioneer Square Labs, Plug and Play, and several others.

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Rediscovering the Legacy of Chemist Jan Czochralski

Published

on

During times of political turmoil, history often gets rewritten, erased, or lost. That is what happened to the legacy of Jan Czochralski, a Polish chemist whose contributions to semiconductor manufacturing were expunged after World War II.

In 1916 he invented a method for growing single crystals of semiconductors, metals, and synthetic gemstones. The process, now known as the Czochralski method, allows scientists to have more control over a semiconductor’s quality.

After the war ended, Czochralski was falsely accused by the Polish government of collaborating with the Germans and betraying his country, according to an article published by the International Union of Crystallography. The allegation apparently ended his academic career as a professor at the Warsaw University of Technology and led to the erasure of his name and work from the school’s records.

He died in 1953 in obscurity in his hometown of Kcynia.

Advertisement

The Czochralski method was honored in 2019 with an IEEE Milestone for enabling the development of semiconductor devices and modern electronics. Administered by the IEEE History Center and supported by donors, the Milestone program recognizes outstanding technical developments around the world.

Inspired by the IEEE recognition, Czochralski’s grandson Fred Schmidt and his great-grandnephew Sylwester Czochralski launched the JanCZ project. The initiative, which aims to educate the public about Czochralski’s life and scientific impact, maintains two websites—one in English and the other in Polish.

“Discovering the [IEEE Milestone] plaque changed my entire mission,” Schmidt says. “It inspired me to engage with Poland, my family history, and my grandfather’s story [on] a more personal level. The [Milestone] is an important award of validation and recognition. It’s a big part of what I’m building my entire case and my story around as I promote the Jan Czochralski legacy and history to the Western world.”

Schmidt, who lives in Texas, is seeking to produce a biopic, translate a Polish biography to English, and turn the chemist’s former homes in Kcynia and Warsaw into museums. The Jan Czochralski Remembrance Foundation has been established by Schmidt to help fund the projects.

Advertisement

The life of the Polish chemist

Before Czochralski’s birth in 1885, Kcynia became part of the German Empire in 1871. Although his family identified as Polish and spoke the language at home, they couldn’t publicly acknowledge their culture, Schmidt says.

When it came time for Czochralski to go to university, rather than attend one in Warsaw, he did what many Germans did at the time: He attended one in Berlin.

After graduating with a bachelor’s degree in metal chemistry in 1907 from the Königlich Technische Hochschule in Charlottenburg (now Technische Universität Berlin), he joined Allgemeine Elektricitäts-Gesellschaft in Berlin as an engineer.

Czochralski experimented with materials to find new formulations that could improve the electrical cables and machinery during the early electrical age, according to a Material World article.

Advertisement

While investigating the crystallization rates of metal, Czochralski accidentally dipped his pen into a pot of molten tin instead of an inkwell. A tin filament formed on the pen’s tip—which he found interesting. Through research, he proved that the filament was a single crystal. His discovery prompted him to experiment with the bulk production of semiconductor crystals.

His paper on what he called the Czochralski method was published in 1918 in the German chemistry journal Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie, but he never found an application for it. (The method wasn’t used until 1948, when Bell Labs engineers Gordon Kidd Teal and J.B. Little adapted it to grow single germanium crystals for their semiconductor production, according to Material World.)

Czochralski continued working in metal science, founding and directing a research laboratory in 1917 at Metallgesellschaft in Frankfurt. In 1919 he was one of the founding members of the German Society for Metals Science, in Sankt Augustin. He served as its president until 1925.

Around that time he developed an innovation that led to his wealth and fame, Schmidt says. Called “B-metal,” the metal alloy was a less expensive alternative to the tin used in manufacturing railroad carriage bearings. Czochralski’s alloy was patented by the German railway Deutsche Bahn and played a significant role in advancing rail transport in Germany, Poland, the Soviet Union, the United Kingdom, and the United States, according to Material World.

Advertisement

“Launching this initiative has been fulfilling and personally rewarding work. My grandfather died in obscurity without ever seeing the results of his work, and my mother spent her entire adult life trying to right these wrongs.”

The achievement brought Czochralski many opportunities. In 1925 he became president of the GDMB Society of Metallurgists and Miners, in Clausthal-Zellerfeld, Germany. Henry Ford invited Czochralski to visit his factories and offered him the position of director at Ford’s new aluminum factory in Detroit. Czochralski declined the offer, longing to return to Poland, Schmidt says. Instead, Czochralski left Germany to become a professor of metallurgy and metal research at the Warsaw University of Technology, at the invitation of Polish President Ignacy Mościcki.

“During World War II, the Nazis took over his laboratories at the university,” Schmidt says. “He had to cooperate with them or die. At night, he and his team [at the university] worked with the Polish resistance and the Polish Army to fight the Nazis.”

After the war ended, Czochralski was arrested in 1945 and charged with betraying Poland. Although he was able to clear his name, damage was done. He left Warsaw and returned to Kcynia, where he ran a small pharmaceutical business until he died in 1953, according to the JanCZ project.

Advertisement

Launching the JanCZ project

Schmidt was born in Czochralski’s home in Kcynia in 1955, two years after his grandfather’s death. He was named Klemens Jan Borys Czochralski. He and his mother (Czochralski’s youngest daughter) emigrated in 1958 when Schmidt was 3 years old, moving to Detroit as refugees. When he was 13, he became a U.S. citizen. He changed his name to Fred Schmidt after his mother married his stepfather.

Schmidt heard stories about his grandfather from his mother his whole life, but he says that “as a teenager, I was just interested in hanging out with my friends, going to school, and working. I really didn’t want much to do with it [family history], because it seemed hard to believe.”

Portrait of Jan Czochralski in a suit jacket and tie. Portrait of Jan Czochralski Byla Sobie Fotka

In 2013 Polish scientist Pawel E. Tomaszewski contacted Schmidt to interview him for a Polish TV documentary about his grandfather.

“He had corresponded with my mother [who’d died 20 years earlier] for previously published biographies about Czochralski,” Schmidt says. “I had some boxes of her things that I started going through to prepare for the interview, and I found original manuscripts and papers he [his grandfather] published about his work.”

Advertisement

The TV crew traveled to the United States and interviewed him for the documentary, Schmidt says, adding, “It was the first time I’d ever had to reckon with the Jan Czochralski story, my connection, my original name, and my birthplace. It was both a very cathartic and traumatic experience for me.”

Ten years after participating in the documentary, Schmidt says, he decided to reconnect with his roots.

“It took me that long to process it [what he learned] and figure out my role in this story,” he says. “That really came to life with my decision to reapply for Polish citizenship, reacquaint myself with the country, and meet my family there.”

In 2024 he visited the Warsaw University of Technology and saw the IEEE Milestone plaque honoring his grandfather’s contribution to technology.

Advertisement

“Once I learned what the Milestone award represented, I thought, Whoa, that’s big,” he says.

Sharing the story with the Western world

Since 2023, Schmidt has dedicated himself to publicizing his grandfather’s story, primarily in the West because he doesn’t speak Polish. Sylwester Czochralski manages the work in Poland, with Schmidt’s input.

Most of the available writing about Czochralski is in Polish, Schmidt says, so his goal is to “spread his story to English-speaking countries.”

He aims to do that, he says, through a biography written by Tomaszewski in Polish that will be translated to English, and a film. The movie is in development by Sywester Banaszkiewicz, who produced and directed the 2014 documentary in Poland. Schmidt says he hopes the movie will be similar to the 2023 biopic about J. Robert Oppenheimer, the theoretical physicist who helped develop the world’s first nuclear weapons during World War II.

Advertisement

The English and Polish versions of the website take visitors through Czochralski’s life and his work. They highlight media coverage of the chemist, including newspaper articles, films, and informational videos posted by YouTube creators.

Schmidt is working with the Czochralski Research and Development Institute in Toruń, Poland, to purchase his grandfather’s home in Kcynia and the mansion he lived in while he was a professor in Warsaw. The institute is a collection of labs and initiatives dedicated to honoring the chemist’s work.

“It’s going to be a long, fun journey, and we have a lot of momentum,” Schmidt says of his plans to turn the residences into museums.

“Launching this initiative has been fulfilling and personally rewarding work,” he says. “My grandfather died in obscurity without ever seeing the results of his work, and my mother spent her entire adult life trying to right these wrongs.

Advertisement

“I’m on an accelerated course to make it [her goal] happen to the best of my ability.”

From Your Site Articles

Related Articles Around the Web

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

The ICE Expansion Won’t Happen in the Dark

Published

on

On Tuesday, WIRED published details of ICE’s planned expansion into more than 150 office spaces across the United States, including 54 specific addresses. If you haven’t read that yet, you should, not least because there’s probably one not far from you.

ICE has designs on every major US city. It plans to not only occupy existing government spaces but share hallways and elevator bays with medical offices and small businesses. It will be down the street from daycares and within walking distance of churches and treatment centers. Its enforcement officers and lawyers will have cubicles a modest drive away from giant warehouses that have been tapped to hold thousands of humans that ICE will detain.

Normally a leasing frenzy like this would happen out in the open; it would involve multiple bids, renovations of selected spaces, all the process and bureaucracy that makes government work slow but accountable. Not so here. The General Services Administration, which manages federal government properties, was asked to skip standard operating procedures in favor of speed and discretion. Internal documents reviewed by WIRED make clear that these locations, and the way in which they were acquired or planned, were intended to be a secret from the start.

They should not be. Which is why we published them.

Advertisement

ICE has more than $75 billion at its disposal, along with at least 22,000 officers and agents. Its occupation of Minneapolis is not an anomaly; it’s a blueprint. Communities deserve to know that they might be next. People have a right to know who their neighbors are, especially when they amount to an invading force.

What we’ve reported so far fills in only part of the puzzle. It shows what ICE had planned as of January, not beyond. More than 100 addresses remain unknown, some of them in high-concentration states like New York and New Jersey. The specific nature of the work being done in some of these offices remains unclear, as is how long ICE plans to be there.

The need to resolve these questions is urgent as ICE continues to metastasize. At the same time, the Department of Justice has become increasingly aggressive in its dealings with journalists, and has repeatedly claimed that revealing any identifying information about ICE agents or their activities is “doxing.” In Minnesota and beyond, ICE and CBP agents have treated observers as enemies, arresting and reportedly harassing them with increased frequency. The DOJ has been quick to label any perceived interference with ICE activity as a crime.

The Trump administration moves quickly by design, banking on the inability of courts, lawmakers, and journalists to keep pace. WIRED will continue to report on this story until we have the answers.

Advertisement

Knowing where ICE will go next is not the same as stopping the agency’s campaign of cruelty and violence. But it gives communities time to prepare for a surge of immigration enforcement in their streets. It gives legislators both locally and nationally insight into the unchecked scope of ICE. And it signals to the administration that it cannot act with impunity, or at the very least total secrecy.

So please, go look where ICE is setting up shop near you. And know that there’s plenty more of this story to tell.


This is an edition of the Inner Loop newsletter. Read previous newsletters here.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Tech

Apple didn't forget macOS Sonoma, macOS Sequoia & iOS 18 on patch day

Published

on

Updates to macOS Sonoma 14.8.4, macOS Sequoia 15.7.4, and iOS 18.7.5 are now available, extending security fixes to older Apple devices alongside the company’s 26.3 releases.

Colorful abstract background of blue and orange light rays radiating outward, with large white text reading Sequoia and smaller text above reading macOS
macOS Sequoia

Apple released updates on February 11 along with macOS Tahoe 26.3, iOS 26.3, iPadOS 26.3, tvOS 26.3, watchOS 26.3, and visionOS 26.3. The security content pages for the older-branch releases show multiple CVE patches in shared system components.
None of these pages mention that the vulnerabilities were actively exploited. Across all three platforms, Apple addressed overlapping issues in CoreAudio, CoreMedia, CFNetwork, the kernel, Sandbox, Wi-Fi, and ImageIO.
Continue Reading on AppleInsider | Discuss on our Forums

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

Seattle startup Integrate lands $17M to expand its super-secure project management tool for defense tech

Published

on

The team at Seattle startup Integrate. (Integrate Photo)

Seattle’s Integrate on Wednesday announced $17 million in new funding to broaden the scope of its super-secure project management tool that targets complex operations in defense, space and other sectors.

Integrate landed a $25 million contract last June from the U.S. Space Force to support the deployment of its software, which enables collaboration between government teams and commercial space contractors.

The company has built the only project management platform adopted by the Joint Worldwide Intelligence Communications System, a classified environment that includes top-secret projects involving multiple clearance levels and hundreds of companies.

“For too long, governments have wasted billions on bespoke, custom products that ultimately fall short in advertised capabilities, security, and availability. The tides are turning on widespread government inefficiency, and commercial ‘off-the-shelf’ products are becoming the new norm,” John Conafay, CEO and co-founder of Integrate, said in a statement.

Prior to launching Integrate in 2022, Conafay worked for a series of commercial space ventures and was with the U.S. Air Force early in his career. Conafay told GeekWire last year that the company was turning a profit.

In addition to customers in defense and space sectors, the startup is also fielding interest from automotive companies building both electric- and combustion-powered vehicles, as well as businesses in renewable energy and maritime.

The Series A round was led by FPV Ventures with participation from Fuse VC and Rsquared VC. Returning investors include New Vista, Hyperplane and Riot Ventures. The new capital brings the company’s total funding to $22 million. The startup employs 28 people.

FPV Ventures co-founder and managing partner Wesley Chan is joining Integrate’s board of directors as part of the deal. Chan was an early investor in Canva, Robinhood and Plaid and other software giants.

Advertisement

“It’s clear that the market has an appetite for technologies that are additive to the massive global defense tech sector,” said Chan. “Integrate’s AI-native platform has the potential to upend the market and accelerate the speed of innovation as we know it.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Tech

The System Of Checks And Balances Doesn’t Work When One Branch Refuses To Play By The Rules

Published

on

from the fuck-em-for-existing-I-guess dept

Technically — TECHNICALLY! — we still have a system that relies on three co-equal branches to ensure that any single branch can’t steamroll the rest of the system (along with the nation it’s supposed to serve) to seize an unequal amount of power.

Technically.

What we’re seeing now is something else entirely. The judicial branch is headed by people who are willing to give the executive branch what it wants, so long as the executive branch is headed by the Republican party. The legislative branch — fully compromised by MAGA bootlickers — has decided to simply not do its job, allowing the executive branch to seize even more power. The executive branch is now just a throne for a king — a man who feels he shouldn’t have to answer to anyone — not even his voting bloc — so long as he remains in power.

The courts can act as a check against executive overreach. But as we’ve seen time and time again, this position means nothing if you’re powerless to enforce it. And that has led to multiple executive officials telling the courts to go fuck themselves when they hand down rulings the administration doesn’t like. A current sitting appellate judge no less made a name for himself in the Trump administration by demonstrating his contempt for the judicial system he’s now an integral part of.

Advertisement

Only good things can come from this! MAGA indeed!

And while this is only one person’s retelling their experience of being caught in the gears of Trump’s anti-brown people activities, it’s illustrative of what little it matters that there are three co-equal branches when one branch makes it clear on a daily basis that it considers itself to be more equal than the rest of them. (via Kathleen Clark on Bluesky)

This is from a sworn statement [PDF] in ongoing litigation against the federal government, as told by “O.,” a Guatemalan resident of Minnesota who has both a pending asylum application as well as a Juvenile Status proceeding still undergoing in the US. None of that mattered to ICE officers, who arrested him in January 2026 and — within 24 hours — shipped him off to a detention center more than a thousand miles from his home.

O. was denied meals, access to phones, access to legal representation, stuffed into overcrowded cells, and generally mistreated by the government that once might have honestly considered the merits of his asylum application.

Advertisement

But the real dirt is this part of the sworn statement, which again exposes this administration’s complete disinterest in adhering to orders from US courts, much less even paying the merest of lip service to rights long considered to be derived from none other than the “Creator” himself.

ICE did not tell me that my attorney had been trying to call me and contact me while I was in Texas. They didn’t tell me my attorney Kim, had retained another attorney, Kira Kelley, to file a habeas petition on my behalf, or that a court had granted it and ordered my release. They just kept holding me there and occasionally trying to get me to self-deport.

[…]

I was put in a cold cell where I had to sleep on the bare cement floor. Around 10 in the morning my cellmate asked to speak to an ICE officer. Three officers came into the cell so I had a chance to speak to them too. One officer told me that I “had no chance of returning to Minnesota” and that “the best thing for [me] is self-deportation.” She told me that if I fought my case, I would spend two to three more months here in El Paso. She offered me $2600 to self-deport. I refused. I wanted to talk to my attorney. They didn’t tell me the judge had already ordered my release and return to Minnesota. If I hadn’t managed to talk to my attorney who told me a while back that I was ordered released, I might have given up at this point and signed the self deportation forms because the conditions were so unbearable.

So… you see the problem. A court can order a release. But the court relies on the government to carry out this instruction. If it doesn’t, the court likely won’t know for days or weeks or months. At that point, a new set of rights abuses will have been inflicted on people who should have been freed. When the government is finally asked to answer for this, it will again engage in a bunch of bluster and obfuscation, forcing the court system to treat the administration like a member of the system of checks and balances even when it’s immediately clear the executive branch has no desire to be checked and/or balanced.

Advertisement

While more judges are now treating the executive branch as a hostile force unwilling to behave honestly or recognize restraints on its power, the imbalance continues to shift in the administration’s favor, largely because it can engage in abusive acts at scale, while the court is restrained to the cases presented to it.

But if you’re outside of the system, you can clearly see what’s happening and see what the future holds if one-third of the government refuses to do its job (the GOP-led Congress) and the other third can’t handle the tidal wave of abuses being presented to it daily. The executive branch will become a kingdom that fears nothing and answers to no one. But the bigger problem is this: most Americans will see this and understand that this will ultimately destroy democracy. Unfortunately, there’s a significant number of voters who actually welcome these developments, figuring it’s better to lick the boots of someone who prefers to rule in hell, rather than serve the United States.

Filed Under: cbp, dhs, mass deportation, trump administration

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025