Connect with us

Crypto World

Is Trump’s New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh Bullish for Crypto?

Published

on

Is Trump’s New Fed Chair Kevin Warsh Bullish for Crypto?

President Donald Trump has named Kevin Warsh as his pick for the next Chair of the US Federal Reserve, setting up a leadership change at the world’s most powerful central bank in May 2026.

The nomination comes at a fragile moment. Inflation remains sticky, markets are jittery, and crypto is already under pressure from macro uncertainty. The choice of Fed chair now matters more than at any point since the pandemic.

So who is Kevin Warsh, how does he differ from Jerome Powell, and what could his appointment mean for interest rates — and for crypto markets in the second half of 2026?

Advertisement

Sponsored

Sponsored

Who Is Kevin Warsh?

Kevin Warsh is not an outsider to the Federal Reserve. His appointment will require Senate confirmation. But markets are already reacting to the policy signal behind the pick.

Warsh served as a Fed Governor from 2006 to 2011, becoming the youngest governor in the institution’s history. 

Advertisement

He worked closely with then-chair Ben Bernanke during the global financial crisis and represented the Fed at G20 meetings.

Back in 2007, Kevin Warsh Spoke at the First-Ever Fed Meeting Recorded by Cameras

After leaving the Fed, Warsh moved into academia and policy. He is currently a senior fellow at Stanford’s Hoover Institution and a frequent critic of modern central banking.

Warsh’s Monetary Policy Record: A Known Inflation Hawk

Historically, Warsh is best described as an inflation hawk.

During the 2008–2009 crisis, he repeatedly warned that aggressive easing could fuel future inflation. He opposed extended quantitative easing and pushed for a smaller Fed balance sheet, even when inflation was subdued.

This puts him at odds with the post-2020 Fed playbook.

Advertisement
The Inflation Hawk Personality Explained. Source: Investopedia

However, Warsh’s stance has evolved. In recent years, he has argued that deregulation and fiscal restraint could lower inflation naturally — allowing the Fed to cut rates without risking price instability.

That shift matters in the current cycle.

Sponsored

Sponsored

How Warsh Differs From Jerome Powell

The contrast with Jerome Powell is sharp.

Advertisement

Powell embraced emergency stimulus during COVID and initially downplayed inflation risks in 2021. That delay later forced the Fed into its most aggressive tightening cycle in decades.

Warsh has openly called that period a policy failure, arguing the Fed lost credibility by reacting too late.

He also criticizes the Fed’s expanding mandate. Warsh opposes central bank involvement in climate policy, social issues, and political signaling. Powell has been more open to these initiatives.

In short, Warsh favors a narrower, more traditional Fed — focused strictly on inflation, employment, and financial stability.

Advertisement

What This Means for Interest Rates in 2026

The Fed’s latest decision this week kept rates unchanged at 3.50%–3.75%, signaling caution after multiple cuts in 2025.

Markets currently expect the next rate cut no earlier than mid-2026.

Warsh’s appointment complicates that outlook.

Sponsored

Advertisement

Sponsored

On one hand, his inflation hawk reputation suggests discipline. He is unlikely to rush cuts without clear evidence inflation is contained.

On the other hand, Warsh has publicly supported Trump’s view that excessive regulation and fiscal expansion are inflationary. If those pressures ease, he could back faster normalization.

That creates a scenario where rate cuts resume in the second half of 2026 — but under tighter justification.

Advertisement

Warsh and Crypto: Not Anti, But Not an Evangelist

Warsh’s relationship with crypto is nuanced.

He has invested personally in crypto-related firms, including the algorithmic stablecoin project Basis and crypto asset manager Bitwise. That alone separates him from many traditional policymakers.

Back in 2021, Kevin Warsh Invested in a $70 Million Funding Round for Bitwise

At the same time, Warsh is deeply skeptical of crypto as money.

He has argued that Bitcoin’s volatility makes it unsuitable as a medium of exchange. However, he has acknowledged Bitcoin could function as a store of value, similar to gold.

Sponsored

Advertisement

Sponsored

His strongest stance is against unregulated private money. Warsh has repeatedly called for clearer rules around stablecoins and supports a wholesale US CBDC limited to interbank use, not retail consumers.

That positions him closer to regulatory clarity than outright hostility.

Could Warsh Be Bullish for Crypto?

Short term, probably not.

Advertisement

Crypto markets remain driven by liquidity, rates, and macro risk. Warsh will not take office until May, and rate policy will remain data-dependent.

But medium to long term, the picture changes.

Warsh’s emphasis on credibility, rule clarity, and a restrained Fed could reduce policy uncertainty — something crypto markets have struggled with for years.

If inflation continues to cool and Warsh supports rate cuts later in 2026, risk assets would benefit. Crypto, which remains highly sensitive to real yields and liquidity expectations, would likely respond positively.

Advertisement

Importantly, Warsh is not ideologically anti-crypto. He views blockchain as a useful technology and prefers regulation over suppression.

That alone could improve sentiment.

Warsh is unlikely to spark an immediate rally. But if his tenure brings clearer regulation, lower inflation, and a path to sustained rate cuts, the second half of 2026 could look meaningfully more constructive.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Crypto World

The ‘Digital Gold’ Narrative Fails Bitcoin (Again)

Published

on

The ‘Digital Gold’ Narrative Fails Bitcoin (Again)


The correlation between the two assets has fallen hard recently.

Bitcoin is not in its ‘digital gold’ period, asserted the CEO and founder of the analytics company CryptoQuant. He based his conclusion on the fact that the correlation between the largest cryptocurrency and the biggest precious metal has diverged massively in the past several months.

When we examine the price performance of bitcoin and gold more closely, we can clearly see where this difference comes from. The correlation between the two was mostly in the green between 2022 and mid-2024.

Then, they broke out, going into red territory for the first time in years during and after the US presidential elections at the end of 2024. BTC skyrocketed to new peaks, while gold trailed behind.

Once the precious metal started to catch up, the correlation jumped to and over 0.5 by Q3 and early Q4 of 2025. However, that’s when the entire landscape in crypto broke, while the precious metal market continued to blossom.

Bitcoin experienced one of its most painful daily corrections on October 10 that altered the industry’s fabric. In a 24-hour period, the entire market collapsed, leaving more than $19 billion in liquidations.

Advertisement

Since then, the asset has not only been unable to recover to the previous heights, but it has continuously declined in value, dropping to $63,000 as of press time. In other words, it sits 50% away from its peak.

You may also like:

In contrast, gold’s price tapped a new all-time high at $5,600 at the end of January, and, besides its instant and untypical crash to $4,400, has been mostly sitting around and above $5,000. It now trades 30% above its October 10 price of $4,000, and its market cap is north of $36.1 trillion. This means the difference between the two is roughly 30x in terms of market cap.

SPECIAL OFFER (Exclusive)

Binance Free $600 (CryptoPotato Exclusive): Use this link to register a new account and receive $600 exclusive welcome offer on Binance (full details).

LIMITED OFFER for CryptoPotato readers at Bybit: Use this link to register and open a $500 FREE position on any coin!

Advertisement

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Crypto World

Can Bhutan’s Solana-Backed Visa Revive Weak SOL Demand?

Published

on

Solana Realized Losses

Solana price has slipped below a recent consolidation range, signaling weakening short-term momentum. SOL had been trading sideways for weeks before breaking lower. 

The decline reflects muted investor demand. This cautious sentiment persists even as Solana expands real-world blockchain adoption.

Solana Bhutan Expand Collaboration

Bhutan recently launched the world’s first Solana-backed visa tailored for digital nomads. The initiative builds on the government’s earlier launch of a gold-backed token, TER, on the Solana blockchain. These developments highlight Solana’s expanding role in sovereign-backed digital infrastructure.

Government-level adoption strengthens Solana’s credibility as a scalable blockchain platform. However, adoption alone has not yet translated into immediate bullish price momentum for SOL.

Advertisement

Want more token insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Crypto Newsletter here.

Solana Holders Exhibit Concern

On-chain metrics show that SOL holders remain cautious. Realized net profit and loss data indicate investors continue selling at a loss. This pattern reflects fading confidence in a near-term rebound. Market participants appear focused on capital preservation rather than accumulation.

During the past 24 hours, as the broader crypto market declined, realized losses jumped by $68 million to $317 million. Elevated realized losses signal sustained bearish sentiment. Persistent selling pressure reduces recovery strength and reinforces short-term downside risks for the Solana price.

Solana Realized Losses
Solana Realized Losses. Source: Glassnode

Bearishness has extended into the derivatives market. Liquidation data shows short positions currently dominate long exposure. Traders appear positioned for further downside. This imbalance suggests that speculative sentiment remains defensive despite ecosystem growth.

The liquidation map reveals $1.15 billion in potential short liquidations if SOL climbs to $89. By comparison, only $242 million in long liquidations would trigger if the price falls to $67. This skew indicates greater pressure on bearish positions during sharp upward moves.

Advertisement
Solana Liquidation Map.
Solana Liquidation Map. Source: Coinglass

SOL Price Is Looking At Volatility

Solana price is trading at $76 at the time of writing. Bollinger Bands are converging, signaling an impending volatility squeeze. Such setups often precede sharp price movements. Based on prevailing bearish indicators, downside risk currently appears elevated.

If SOL loses the $73 support level, the next downside target stands near $64. A drop to this zone could trigger long liquidations. Increased forced selling may intensify volatility and deepen short-term losses for holders.

Solana Price Analysis.
Solana Price Analysis. Source: TradingView

Conversely, a shift in sentiment could support recovery. If bulls regain control, Solana price may reenter consolidation between $78 and $87. Sustained stability within this range would improve structure. A breakout above $89 could trigger $1.15 billion in short liquidations, accelerating upside momentum.

Source link

Continue Reading

Crypto World

Crypto Execs Push Back on Viral Claim

Published

on

Crypto Execs Push Back on Viral Claim

A market analysis viewed almost 5 million times on X states that Bitcoin derivatives have turned the cryptocurrency’s 21-million-supply cap into a “theoretically infinite” one.

Past Bitcoin (BTC) falls had a clear catalyst, but sharp drops in the opening months of 2026 have sparked several theories, ranging from digital asset treasuries (DATs) blowing up under pressure to a lingering hangover from October’s mass liquidation cascade.

Robert Kendall, author of “The Kendall Report,” claimed he cracked it in his viral X post. He argued that Bitcoin’s valuation logic based on fixed supply “died” once cash-settled futures, exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and other financial instruments were layered on top of the asset.

However, executives and researchers across the digital asset industry rejected Kendall’s analysis. Several told Cointelegraph that leverage affects price dynamics without changing Bitcoin’s underlying supply.

Advertisement
Kendall suggested that derivatives undermine Bitcoin’s scarcity. Source: Robert Kendall

Harriet Browning, vice president of sales at institutional staking company Twinstake, told Cointelegraph, “When institutions allocate via ETFs and DATs, they are not diluting scarcity, as there will still only ever be 21 million. They are not minting new Bitcoin.”

“Instead, they are putting Bitcoin into the hands of long-term institutional holders who deeply understand its value proposition, not speculative traders looking for a quick exit,” she added.

Scarcity, lost coins and the question of effective float

When Bitcoin was first introduced to the world, the only way to acquire it was to buy it from other enthusiasts, mine it or trade it for pizza. Soon, crypto exchanges became available and opened retail access to the spot market.

In 2026, investors can also gain exposure through financial products built on spot crypto. To put it simply, Bitcoin now has a paper market of its own. However, skeptics of Kendall’s analysis said that a paper market does not damage Bitcoin’s scarcity.

“Gold has a massive paper market in futures, ETFs and unallocated accounts that dwarfs physical supply, yet nobody argues gold isn’t scarce. Paper claims don’t change the amount of gold in the ground, and the same logic applies to Bitcoin,” Luke Nolan, a senior research associate at CoinShares, told Cointelegraph.

Advertisement

Bitcoin is often compared to gold for similarities like headlining the internet generation’s own gold rush, being a store of value and being a hedge against currency debasement. It is also programmed to a hard supply cap that doesn’t fluctuate even when investment products are built on top of it, much like a gold bar wouldn’t magically sprout out of its own derivatives.

Bitcoin is often compared to gold, but the metal smashed records, while its digital counterpart struggled. Source: TradingView

Like precious metals, new Bitcoin enters the market through a process called mining. Instead of digging the earth, the system rewards those who verify transactions on the blockchain about every 10 minutes. Those rewards are sliced in half every four years, so Bitcoin’s supply growth slows over time, along with the amount of virgin Bitcoin entering the economy.

As of February, about 19.99 million BTC has been mined, though Nolan calls this metric misleading, as not all of these coins are available for investors. Users can lose their passwords or take them to their graves. Up to 4 million coins are estimated to be permanently lost.

In September, 14.3 million BTC, or over 71% of mined coins, was counted in Bitcoin’s illiquid supply. Source: Glassnode

With more spot Bitcoin becoming inaccessible, Nolan claimed that the institutional access layer actually reinforces Bitcoin’s scarcity.

“Spot ETFs require physical BTC to be held in custody, and in 2025 alone, combined ETF and corporate treasury holdings grew significantly. That is real supply being pulled off the market,” he said.

Related: Are quantum-proof Bitcoin wallets insurance or a fear tax?

Advertisement

Bitcoin’s shift to derivatives-led price formation

Even critics of Kendall’s supply argument acknowledge that Bitcoin’s short-term price discovery now leans heavily on instruments tied to institutional markets.

Derivative activity has increasingly shifted to traditional finance venues. CME futures overtook Binance in BTC futures open interest in late 2023, although Binance recently regained the lead.

Binance and CME have traded leads in BTC futures open interest as of late. Source: CoinGlass

“Derivatives markets have become the primary venue for expressing institutional views on Bitcoin, and as a result, they now play a central role in spot price discovery,” said Browning.

Browning added that derivatives and ETFs influence Bitcoin’s spot price through three main transmission channels.

First, markets like CME influence short-term price discovery because institutional traders express their bullish or bearish views in futures before the spot market. When futures prices diverge from spot prices, traders opt for arbitrage strategies, such as basis trades, to close the gap. According to Browning, hedge funds routinely buy spot Bitcoin or its ETFs while shorting CME futures to capture the premium between the two.

Advertisement

Second, when banks sell Bitcoin-linked notes to clients, they typically hedge their exposure by buying Bitcoin through ETFs, effectively creating more spot demand.

Related: Banks can’t seem to service crypto, even as it goes mainstream

Third, crypto-native perpetual futures can spill over into the spot market through funding-rate arbitrage. When funding rates are positive, heavy long positioning encourages traders to buy spot Bitcoin and short futures to earn funding payments, adding spot demand. When funding turns negative, that flow can reverse and pressure the price.

“Today, derivatives volumes frequently exceed spot volumes, and many institutional participants prefer derivatives, alongside ETFs, for capital efficiency, hedging and short exposure,” Browning said.

Advertisement

“Spot markets increasingly serve as the settlement and inventory layer, while derivatives increasingly influence marginal price discovery, and new price levels are negotiated.”

Derivatives don’t delete Bitcoin’s scarcity from the blockchain

The rise of Bitcoin’s paper market means investors no longer have to directly hold BTC to gain exposure.

Futures and perpetual contracts allow investors to express bullish or bearish views, hedge risk or deploy leverage. Similar derivatives have long existed in commodities markets without altering the physical amount of gold, oil or other assets in circulation.

Nima Beni, founder of crypto leasing platform BitLease, told Cointelegraph:

“The premise that synthetic exposure destroys scarcity is as flawed as a misapplied commodity-market analogy used about paper gold. It was wrong then; it’s wrong now.”

Kendall defended his position after Bitcoiners equipped with their own arguments flooded his viral post.

Advertisement

“I’m not arguing [derivatives] ‘delete’ scarcity from the blockchain. What I’m saying is they shift where marginal price is set,” he said.

Kendall’s response was only seen about 3,000 times. Source: Robert Kendall

Bitcoin’s 21-million cap remains unchanged in code. No derivative contract, ETF or structured product can mint new coins beyond that limit. But what has evolved around Bitcoin is price discovery.

Derivatives increasingly shape marginal price formation before flows filter back into spot. That alters how and where Bitcoin’s value is negotiated.

Both Kendall and his critics ultimately agree on that point.

Magazine: Bitcoin may take 7 years to upgrade to post-quantum: BIP-360 co-author

Advertisement