Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

Why Andy Burnham Should Take Andy Street’s Counsel on UK Growth

Published

on

Why Andy Burnham Should Take Andy Street's Counsel on UK Growth

There is a particular sort of Englishman who can walk into a room full of sceptics, sceptical bankers and business owners like me, sceptical councillors and sceptical journalists with their arms folded and their expense-account pastries going cold, and leave forty minutes later having quietly persuaded the lot of us that the country is not, after all, finished. Andy Street is that Englishman.

I spent an afternoon recently listening to him lay out Prosper UK, the movement he has launched with Ruth Davidson to win back the seven million voters who feel they have nowhere left to put their cross, and I came away thinking something I had not thought in a worryingly long time. Competence, it turns out, is a political philosophy all on its own.

From having headed up CBM, the publishers of Business Matters, for over two decades I have spent enough years watching politicians promise the moon and deliver a damp car park to be cured of any romance about the lot of them. But Street is a different animal, and the reason is dully, gloriously unsexy: he has actually run things. He spent the best part of a decade as managing director of John Lewis, a shop that, last time I checked, managed to sell socks without bankrupting the nation. Then he spent seven years as Mayor of the West Midlands, during which something like 100,000 jobs arrived and roughly £10 billion of investment followed them through the door. He did not tweet the economy into existence. He went out, in an unfashionable suit, and got it.

Prosper UK is, in a sense, the same instinct dressed for national service. Davidson and Street reckon there are seven million Britons who believe in enterprise, sound money and public services that actually work, yet feel that no party will own all three at once. Tens of thousands signed up within a fortnight, which tells you the hunger is real. You can sneer at the centre ground all you like, and plenty of clever people do, but it is where most of the country quietly lives and works and pays its taxes.

Which brings me, inevitably, to the other Andy.

Advertisement

By the time you read this, Andy Burnham may well be measuring the curtains in Downing Street. The man who spent years as the King in the North, having decamped to Westminster as the new Member for Makerfield, is now the overwhelming favourite to lead the country, and he has arrived with a genuinely interesting prospectus. His “No 10 North”, the plan to physically wrench decision-making out of Whitehall and plant it in Manchester, is the boldest thing anyone has said about the British constitution in years. You can read the full sweep of it in TIME’s account of his economic and devolution agenda, and whatever you make of the politics, the ambition is real.

Here is the thing that nobody in either tribe seems willing to say out loud. These two men are, on the economy, arguing for almost exactly the same thing.

Both believe the British state is too centralised, too timid and too obsessed with the square mile around the Treasury. Both have spent their careers proving that a metro mayor with real powers can shift the dial in a way no Whitehall mandarin ever has. The Institute for Government has documented how Greater Manchester’s mayoralty became the template the rest of the country now copies. And the case for going further is hardly some fringe obsession of mine; Business Matters has been making it for years, from the academics arguing that regional disparities can be tackled by more devolution to the London business lobby that, remarkably, agrees Burnham is right to put devolution front and centre.

So why am I urging the incoming Prime Minister to take a quiet cup of tea with a Conservative he beat to nothing? Because Burnham has the mandate and Street has the manual.

Advertisement

Burnham is a brilliant campaigner, a man who can summon a crowd and a cause with equal ease. But running a national economy is not a rally. It is procurement, planning, skills funding, the unglamorous grinding business of getting a tram line built before the next election rather than the one after. Street has done precisely this, at scale, and he has done it while keeping the private sector in the room rather than haranguing it from the steps outside. When Japanese investors poured £118 million into Greater Manchester, business leaders rightly warned that Whitehall must now match that confidence. Confidence is built by people who deliver, not people who announce.

There is a national vice we really must shake off, and it is the belief that wisdom only ever comes wrapped in your own colours. The Americans call it tribalism; I call it self-harm. If the next Prime Minister genuinely wants to rewire Britain, he could do a great deal worse than borrow the wiring diagram from the one man who has already done the job and lived to tell the tale.

Sit down with Street, Andy. Order the good biscuits. Listen. The economy you are about to inherit is far too important to leave in the hands of people who merely agree with you.


Richard Alvin

Richard Alvin

Richard Alvin is a serial entrepreneur, a former advisor to the UK Government about small business and an Honorary Teaching Fellow on Business at Lancaster University.

A winner of the London Chamber of Commerce Business Person of the year and Freeman of the City of London for his services to business and charity. Richard is also Group MD of Capital Business Media and SME business research company Trends Research, regarded as one of the UK’s leading experts in the SME sector and an active angel investor and advisor to new start companies.

Richard is also the host of Save Our Business the U.S. based business advice television show.

Advertisement

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Inside The S&P 500's June Swoon And AI Boom, July Fireworks Possible

Published

on

Energy, Infrastructure, And Industrials - My Favorite Places To Invest For The Next Decade

Inside The S&P 500's June Swoon And AI Boom, July Fireworks Possible

Continue Reading

Business

REA Group: Buy A Beaten-Up Market Leader

Published

on

REA Group: Buy A Beaten-Up Market Leader

REA Group: Buy A Beaten-Up Market Leader

Continue Reading

Business

Texas Instruments: An AI Beneficiary, But Not Cheap Enough To Buy

Published

on

Texas Instruments: An AI Beneficiary, But Not Cheap Enough To Buy

Texas Instruments: An AI Beneficiary, But Not Cheap Enough To Buy

Continue Reading

Business

Exclusive-Activist Jana Partners has new stake in Everpure, sources

Published

on

Exclusive-Activist Jana Partners has new stake in Everpure, sources


Exclusive-Activist Jana Partners has new stake in Everpure, sources

Continue Reading

Business

Australia sues Amazon for making allegedly unfair contracts with subscribers

Published

on

A woman in a pink bikini lies on a deck chair covered in pink blankets, reads a magazine. there are pink towels, a tote bag and a radio next to her.

Australia’s consumer watchdog has sued Amazon, claiming the tech giant introduced adverts in Prime Video using allegedly unfair contract terms.

The Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) said Amazon had broken consumer protection law by making the unfair contracts with over a million annual subscribers between November 2023 and August 2025.

“Consumers who wanted to avoid ads were left with no choice but to pay more to maintain the service they’d initially signed up for”, ACCC chair Gina Cass-Gottlieb said.

Amazon has been approached for comment.

Advertisement

For more than a decade, Prime Video was a commercial-free streaming offering that was included as part of Amazon’s popular Prime subscription, which is sold as an upgrade on its core delivery service.

Prime became available in Australia in 2018. It started to roll out advertising in the service globally in early 2024.

When Amazon began that year to include ads within Prime Video, it told subscribers in Australia they would need to pay an additional fee each month in order to keep the service free of ads, driving the monthly price up to 12.99 Australian dollars.

At that point, the ACCC said over 850,000 people in Australia had already paid for a year’s worth of Prime service.

Advertisement

“Those subscribers were provided with a degraded, ad-supported Prime Video service for the balance of their prepaid term unless they paid for the ad-free option”, the ACCC added in a filing, external.

The ACCC said Amazon did this by relying on five unfair terms in contracts with over a million customers signed between 1 November 2023 and 18 August 2025.

“Those contracts included five terms permitting [Amazon Australia] to unilaterally make materially adverse changes to its services (including, but not limited to, Prime Video) and the terms governing those services, without any contractual entitlement for subscribers to receive refunds or other meaningful redress,” the ACCC said.

Amazon’s treatment of its users has come under government scrutiny before.

Advertisement

In the US, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in recent years has taken legal action against Amazon on claims that the company would sign people up for Prime without their consent, external, and then make it difficult for people to cancel a subscription.

The company on Tuesday also agreed to pay an FTC fine, external to resolve claims that it created a “Kafkaesque ordeal” for people who were victims of online shopping fraud.

In the UK, the government has previously investigated Amazon’s method of listing goods for sale, and the proliferation of fake reviews of products.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Gas prices under scrutiny as Bessent vows to hold retailers accountable

Published

on

Gas prices under scrutiny as Bessent vows to hold retailers accountable

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned gasoline retailers that the Trump administration is “watching” pump prices and expects them to pass lower oil costs on to Americans.

Speaking on “Fox & Friends,” Bessent’s comments came a day after President Donald Trump urged gas stations to lower prices to around $2.50 per gallon following a decline in crude oil prices.

Advertisement

“I would encourage them to be good actors, especially in the 250th anniversary, because we’re watching,” Bessent said Tuesday. 

TRUMP DECLARES FOOD SUPPLY EMERGENCY, SUSPENDS TARIFFS ON KEY FERTILIZER IMPORTS

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent arrives for House committee hearing.

Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent arrived before testifying before the House Ways and Means Committee in the Longworth House Office Building on June 4, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Images / Getty Images)

Gas prices rose during the conflict between Israel and Iran, though prices have eased since the onset of the fighting. The AAA national average for regular gas was $3.860 per gallon as of June 29, down from $4.391 a month earlier but still higher than the year-earlier average of $3.187.

AMERICAN AIRLINES DELAY STRANDS GOP LAWMAKER, CAUSES 3 HOUSE MEMBERS TO MISS VOTES

Advertisement

Higher fuel costs have squeezed consumers and businesses alike, with some California small business owners saying they’re “working for peanuts” just to keep their doors open. But Bessent said that as crude oil prices decline, he’ll be watching gasoline retailers to ensure savings are passed on to consumers.

“We’ve got a chart of how quickly the prices went up and how they followed crude, and we’re going to hold them accountable on the other side,” he said, calling Trump’s Truth Social post on the issue “powerful.”

The president wrote on Truth Social earlier this week, “Gasoline Retailers must get their Prices down, IMMEDIATELY!” and added that “They’re too high considering that Oil is now at $68 a Barrel, and heading south.”

Advertisement

TECH CEO PREDICTS AI GLASSES WILL TURN AMERICANS INTO ‘WALKING CAMERAS’ AS NEXT TECH ERA ARRIVES

CLICK HERE TO GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO

“The Retailers must quickly react to this statement, and do what they know is right — DROP YOUR PRICE FOR OUR GREAT AMERICAN PEOPLE!” he continued. “There will be no gauging, which is totally illegal. If Retailers don’t do this, big problems lie ahead!”

Bessent said stations often benefit when oil prices spike and argued it is now time to provide relief for the public. “They’re making an extra margin there, and they probably had record profits on gasoline retailing. Now it’s time to do something for the American people,” he said. 

Advertisement

Fox News Digital’s Greg Wehner contributed to this report. 

Continue Reading

Business

Here Are 5 Things Every Galaxy Owner Must Know Right Now

Published

on

Galaxy S26

Samsung has confirmed that its long-running Messages app will be discontinued in July 2026, ending a texting platform that has shipped on Galaxy devices since 2009 and forcing millions of remaining users to migrate to Google Messages before the cutoff arrives. Here’s what Android owners need to understand about the shutdown and how to prepare.

1. The shutdown is scheduled for July 2026, with some users reporting a specific date. Samsung’s official End of Service notice, posted on its U.S. support website, states plainly that “the Samsung Messages application will be discontinued in July 2026,” directing users to “upgrade to Google Messages as your default messaging app today to maintain a consistent messaging experience on Android.” While Samsung’s public messaging has stuck to the broader monthlong window, at least one specific date has surfaced through device notifications sent directly to users. A screenshot obtained by NBC Chicago showed one notice reading, “Samsung Messages is being discontinued on July 6 2026.” Samsung has advised users to check the Samsung Messages app itself for the exact shutdown date applicable to their device, suggesting the rollout may be phased or staggered rather than occurring all at once.

2. Once the cutoff hits, the app won’t disappear, but it will stop functioning as a texting tool. According to the fine print in Samsung’s notice, “sending messages via Samsung Messages on your phone will no longer be possible, except for emergency service numbers or emergency contacts defined in your device.” The shutdown also extends to a feature some users have come to rely on for cross-device texting: Samsung’s Message Continuity service, known as “Call & Text on Other Devices,” which allows people to send texts from a paired tablet or PC, will also be disrupted once Samsung Messages is formally discontinued.

3. The change is currently limited to the U.S. market, and not every device is affected equally. Samsung’s notice specifies that the discontinuation applies to the U.S. market only, with no confirmed shutdown date announced for other regions at this time. Within the U.S., devices running Android 11 or lower are explicitly excluded from this particular end-of-service deadline and will continue functioning as before. However, availability of the app itself has already been shrinking ahead of the formal cutoff: owners of the Galaxy S26 and newer devices cannot download Samsung Messages from the Galaxy Store at all, and once the app is officially discontinued in July, no other devices will be able to download it from the Galaxy Store either. On devices released before 2022, switching messaging apps may temporarily disrupt ongoing RCS conversations, though Samsung says those conversations can resume once both parties have switched to Google Messages, with standard MMS and SMS messaging remaining available throughout that transition period.

Advertisement

4. The shift is part of a broader, years-long move toward Google Messages and RCS standardization, not a sudden decision. Samsung stopped making its own Messages app the default texting platform on Galaxy phones back in 2021 and stopped pre-installing it alongside Google Messages starting in 2024. The July 2026 shutdown formalizes a shift the company had already been making in practice for years. Industry observers have tied the change closely to Google’s broader push for Rich Communication Services, or RCS, a messaging standard often described as Android’s answer to Apple’s iMessage. Google Messages offers RCS features including read receipts, real-time typing indicators, higher-quality photo and video sharing, end-to-end encryption in supported chats, and integration with Gemini-powered AI tools such as suggested replies and an experimental image-generation feature. Samsung has framed the consolidation around streamlining the texting experience, stating in its announcement that the goal is to “maintain a consistent messaging experience on Android.” The company has also emphasized that the discontinuation is limited specifically to messaging and does not affect other core Galaxy apps or services.

5. Scammers are already exploiting confusion around the transition, so verify any notice independently. As word of the shutdown has spread, fraudulent text messages designed to mimic Samsung’s official notifications have begun circulating, targeting confused Galaxy phone owners. One reader from Running Springs, California, who goes by Gilberto, described receiving a suspicious text warning him that Samsung Messages would end on a specific date and urging him to switch apps immediately. While the underlying shift to Google Messages is genuine, security experts have cautioned that unsolicited texts urging immediate action, particularly those containing links, should be treated skeptically. The safest approach is to ignore unexpected links entirely and instead verify any notice directly through a device’s own settings or by checking the Samsung Messages app, rather than clicking through a text message claiming to be from Samsung.

For most users, the actual process of switching should be straightforward when it comes to standard text messages. Google Messages draws from a device’s standard SMS and MMS database, meaning older text conversations typically carry over automatically without requiring any manual export. Users can switch by opening or installing Google Messages, then selecting the option to set it as their default SMS app. Samsung has said many Galaxy phones will display in-app notifications within Samsung Messages guiding users through that transition before the cutoff arrives. The shutdown also extends to Tizen OS smartwatches, where Samsung Messages is similarly being discontinued, though those devices will retain basic read and send capability even as full conversation history access is lost; Galaxy Watch models running WearOS are handled differently and will retain full conversation continuity through Google Messages across phone, tablet and watch.

With the July deadline approaching, Samsung is encouraging all remaining Samsung Messages users, particularly those on devices still capable of running the app, to complete the switch to Google Messages well ahead of the cutoff date rather than waiting until service is formally discontinued and texting capability becomes limited to emergency contacts only.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Watchdog moves to crack Apple and Google’s app store grip

Published

on

Tracy Brabin leads West Yorkshire trade mission to Switzerland and Germany

The UK’s competition regulator is preparing to loosen Apple and Google’s hold over the mobile economy, proposing rules that would let app developers point customers towards cheaper ways to pay outside the two companies’ app stores.

The Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) argues that consumers and the businesses that build apps are being short-changed by restrictions stopping people from spending money outside Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play Store. With at least 90 per cent of UK mobile devices running on one of the two platforms, the regulator has branded the pair an “effective duopoly”, a description it has used repeatedly as it ramps up scrutiny of the sector.

At the heart of the proposals is “steering”, the practice of letting an app guide users to a website where they can subscribe or buy directly, sidestepping the platforms entirely. The CMA is consulting on lifting the curbs that currently block this, a change it says would let apps bypass the “mandatory fees” the two companies impose. Both Apple and Google charge commission of up to 30 per cent on purchases made inside apps, including subscriptions, a levy that has long irritated developers and the focus of the regulator’s proposed action to drive more competition on mobile platforms.

The restrictions have real consequences for how people use everyday apps. Spotify, for instance, does not let UK users buy a monthly subscription through the Apple App Store, because it does not want to absorb the fees and pass them on to customers. Would-be subscribers must instead sign up via the desktop website, an awkward workaround that the CMA believes typifies a market lacking competitive pressure.

Will Hayter, executive director at the CMA, said it was important to give apps and their users more choice over how they transact and communicate. “This is not only because choice is inherently valuable but also because we see this as the best way to introduce some competitive pressure in a vital part of the mobile ecosystem that is otherwise sorely lacking such pressure,” he said.

Advertisement

Crucially, the watchdog is not proposing to strip the platforms of all revenue. Apple and Google would still be able to charge fees for allowing steering, provided those charges are applied fairly. Google said it had already made the required changes, including letting apps steer users outside the Play Store to complete transactions, and has introduced new fees this week covering, among other things, charges for steering users to alternative payment methods.

The CMA is also weighing whether to force Apple to open up access to its near-field communication (NFC) technology, the chip behind contactless payments. Doing so could allow developers to offer their own tap-to-pay services inside iOS apps rather than routing everything through Apple Pay, a move that would hand more room to challengers. British fintech Curve is among those that have already set out plans to take on Apple Wallet with a rival payment system.

The proposals build on the CMA’s decision last October to award Apple and Google “strategic market status” over their dominance of the mobile market, a designation that allows the regulator to set bespoke conduct rules for each company. That ruling has already prompted both firms to agree a series of UK app store changes, and the latest package of measures aimed at opening up the mobile market goes further still. The full consultation on the new requirements for Apple and Google’s mobile platforms is now open.

Apple, predictably, is unhappy. The company warned that the steering changes undermine protections for users and open the door to scams and the circumventing of parental controls. “When users are directed away from Apple’s trusted payment infrastructure, they lose the protections they rely on Apple to provide. We will continue to make our concerns clear in our ongoing dialogue with the CMA,” a spokesperson said.

Advertisement

For the UK’s small and medium-sized app businesses, the prize is straightforward: lower fees, a more direct relationship with customers and, the CMA hopes, savings that can be reinvested into the kind of innovation an entrenched duopoly has tended to discourage.


Jamie Young

Jamie Young

Jamie is Senior Reporter at Business Matters, bringing over a decade of experience in UK SME business reporting.
Jamie holds a degree in Business Administration and regularly participates in industry conferences and workshops.

When not reporting on the latest business developments, Jamie is passionate about mentoring up-and-coming journalists and entrepreneurs to inspire the next generation of business leaders.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Gloucestershire Airport put up for sale again as bosses refuse to reveal why it’s losing millions

Published

on

Business Live

The Staverton airfield is currently a loss-making site

View of Gloucestershire Airport runway

View of Gloucestershire Airport runway

Gloucestershire Airport is going back up for sale again, its joint owners have announced. Cheltenham Borough Council and Gloucester City Council confirmed on Tuesday (June 30) the Staverton site would brought back to market, with property firm Savills appointed to lead a renewed sales process.

The news comes just three months after the sale of the loss-making transport hub fell through after months of negotiations. In March, a deal to offload the airport to preferred buyer Horizon Aero Group collapsed after the authorities said they could not accept the terms of the sale.

Advertisement

On Tuesday, council chiefs said they were relaunching the sale process after receiving a “number of approaches” from interested parties.

Councillor Rowena Hay, leader of Cheltenham Borough Council, said: ‘’We are hopeful this renewed sale process will attract the right partner for the airport’s future, which remains our key priority. We will work with partners and stakeholders to update as the new sale process proceeds.’’

Councillor Jeremy Hilton, leader of Gloucester City Council, said: “Gloucestershire Airport is a vital economic and aviation asset for our county and region and we must do our best for it.

“In recent weeks there has been considerable interest from potential investors in the airport and now is the right time to put the airport back on the market.

Advertisement

“This next phase gives us the opportunity to build on what we have learned and engage with investors who share our vision for growth and continued aviation at Staverton.”

It comes as bosses at Gloucestershire Airport refused to reveal to the public on Monday why the airfield has cost taxpayers millions of pounds in recent years.

City councillors were given an update on the situation of the 350-acre general aviation site, which sees around 66,000 aircraft movements a year. During the public meeting, civic chiefs quizzed airport management over the operational loss at the site.

A slide presented to the committee suggested an unaudited loss for the financial year, including depreciation and loan interest, of £2.1m. It also showed the situation had improved over the last three years.

Advertisement

Operational losses, excluding non-monetary adjustments, loans and depreciation, in 2024 was £1,333,041, falling to £738,030 in 2025 and £489,979 in 2026.

Interim managing director Brian Rawlings said it was “one of the few airfields you can walk in having never flown an aircraft and leave to go off and fly for an airline”.

“I can’t think of another airfield that offers that facility,” he said. “And that is backed up with the various tenants that we have there that offer some extensive flight training that is basically unique.”

But when asked why they can’t make it pay for the taxpayer, airport chiefs refused to answer detailed questions in public – instead they said they would tell civic chiefs away from the public eye.

Advertisement

During the public part of the meeting, the airport’s head of finance, Marian Bidmead, said the bottom line figure was a £2.1m loss. She explained the accounts were unaudited and it could be more or less than £2.1m because they “have fair evaluations on the market rentals to do as well and capitalised interest to take into account on top of that”.

Mr Rawlings admitted all members of the team were “fully aware” of what the situation and said they “absolutely” took it seriously.

“We’ve got people there who are very loyal to the airfield, very skilled and for us to be able to turn things around and make it the best airfield it can be, yes, absolutely we can do it. I’m sure we can,” he added.

The committee ultimately voted to exclude the press and public to further discuss airport issues behind closed doors while the chairman voted against.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Trump pushes domestic rare earth processing to reduce China reliance

Published

on

Trump pushes domestic rare earth processing to reduce China reliance

President Donald Trump’s push to rebuild a domestic rare earth supply chain reached another milestone as the U.S. Army partners with industry to expand North American processing capacity for materials used in military equipment, as part of a broader effort to reduce reliance on China.

REalloys CEO Leonard “Lipi” Sternheim joined FOX Business’ Maria Bartiromo on “Mornings with Maria” to discuss the company’s role in developing heavy rare earth processing capabilities alongside government and industry partners.

Advertisement
A soldier of the U.S. Army.

A U.S. Army soldier handling caliber cartridges. (Sean Gallup / Getty Images)

Heavy rare earth elements such as dysprosium and terbium are essential components in advanced defense technologies, including fighter jets, missiles, submarines and drones. While rare earth deposits exist in multiple countries, much of the world’s processing and refining capacity has been concentrated in China for decades.

“Currently, China controls the entire supply chain of rare earths for heavies, which is where the processing, the refining, the metalizing magnet making,” Sternheim said, adding that REalloys is focused on bringing “the full supply chain” to North America.

TEXAS RARE-EARTH PROJECT AIMS TO CURB US RELIANCE ON CHINA, STRENGTHEN NATIONAL SECURITY

Advertisement

Sternheim said an upcoming federal procurement requirement scheduled to take effect on January 1, 2027, is expected to accelerate domestic sourcing for the defense industrial base by restricting products with a Chinese nexus.

He also argued that the challenge is less about finding rare earth deposits than rebuilding the refining and processing expertise needed to turn raw materials into usable products.

“It’s not the rocks that are rare. It’s the processing and refining, which are complicated technologies,” Sternheim said.

Advertisement

He noted the U.S. Army’s partnership with REalloys is designed to ensure critical defense materials can be sourced domestically rather than from geopolitical rivals.

NOEM WARNS OF ‘COORDINATED’ EFFORT TO FUNNEL CHINESE NATIONALS INTO US

“The reason the military partnership is so important, because that gives the country the security it needs. Nothing is reliant on other countries after that. We’re building it here. We’re building it with a partnership with the Army on their bases,” he said.

Looking ahead, Sternheim said expanding domestic capacity will take time but expressed confidence that the U.S. and its partners will make meaningful progress over the next several years.

Advertisement

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025