The Thailand Board of Investment (BOI) has approved seven major data center and hosting projects, highlighting the nation’s dedication to advancing its digital infrastructure.

Chaired by Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance Mr. Ekniti Nitithanprapas, the decision aims to position Thailand as a premier Digital Innovation Hub within ASEAN, addressing the increasing demand for robust and reliable digital services.

These strategic investments are crucial for accelerating Thailand’s digital transformation. By building secure and high-performance data capabilities, we are fulfilling the rising demand and enabling businesses to innovate and prosper, both domestically and across the region.

Mr. Narit Therdsteerasukdi, Secretary General of the Thailand Board of Investment (BOI).

These newly approved projects collectively represent a substantial investment exceeding USD 3.1 billion (THB 96.88 billion) and signify a major leap in technological advancement for Thailand. The BOI’s Secretary General, Mr. Narit Therdsteerasukdi, emphasized that these strategic investments are crucial for accelerating Thailand’s digital transformation by building secure and high-performance data capabilities to meet rising demand and enable business innovation.

The approved projects include:

• True Internet Data Center Co., Ltd.: Three data center projects with a total investment of approximately USD 1.4 billion (THB 45.3 billion), offering a combined IT load of 223 MW, situated in Chonburi and Samut Prakan.
• GSA Data Center 05 Co., Ltd.: Two projects amounting to roughly USD 1.2 billion (THB 37.2 billion), located at WHA Eastern Seaboard Industrial Estate 5 (Rayong) and in Samut Prakan, with a combined IT load of 120 MW.
• Stellar DC Co., Ltd.: A single project totaling USD 0.3 billion (THB 8.1 billion), developed by STECON Group in collaboration with SC Zeus Data Centers (Singapore), located in Bangkok and supporting a 25 MW IT load.
• Freyr Technology (Thailand) Co., Ltd.: A Singapore-based entity investing USD 0.2 billion (THB 6.3 billion) in a data hosting project, with facilities planned for Rayong and Samut Prakan.

These approvals build upon a strong foundation from the previous year, as the BOI received a cumulative total of 36 data center projects in 2025, representing an investment value exceeding USD 23.1 billion (THB 728 billion). These facilities are distributed across key provinces including Bangkok, Chachoengsao, Chonburi, Pathum Thani, Rayong, and Samut Prakan.

The expected benefits from these data center projects are multifaceted:

• Job Creation: They are anticipated to generate numerous highly skilled jobs for Thai professionals in critical technology sectors.
• Sustainability: The sector’s focus on high-efficiency “Green Data Centers” aligns with global sustainability trends and Thailand’s commitment to responsible development.
• Economic Ecosystem: These widespread investments will foster a robust domestic supply chain, encompassing infrastructure providers, hardware manufacturers, facility management services, and a thriving ecosystem of online businesses across e-commerce, fintech, and AI.
• Digital Sovereignty: Expanding domestic data center capabilities will ensure faster data access (low latency), bolster cybersecurity, and strengthen data sovereignty, making Thailand an even more attractive destination for global digital players and solidifying its role as a true Digital Innovation Hub for ASEAN.

The newly approved data center projects are designed to facilitate Thailand’s regional leadership as a ‘Digital Innovation Hub in ASEAN’ through several key avenues beyond simply increasing computational capacity. These strategic investments, totaling over USD 3.1 billion, are deemed crucial for accelerating Thailand’s digital transformation and enabling businesses to innovate and prosper both domestically and across the region.

Other People are Reading

SBI Funds Management has raised nearly ₹2,663 crore from 129 anchor investors ahead of the opening of its ₹9,813 crore initial public offering (IPO) on July 14. The company allotted 4.63 crore shares at upper price band of ₹574 apiece to these institutional investors

Brokerages have recommended subscribing to SBI Funds Management’s Rs 9,813 crore initial public offering (IPO), citing its market leadership, strong earnings growth, healthy return ratios and reasonable valuation relative to listed peers. While most recommend the issue for long-term investors, some also see potential for listing gains.

A group of white Democratic pastors is mounting an unusual challenge to Republican dominance among Christian voters ahead of November’s midterm elections, arguing that the party in power has misused Christian teaching for political ends and that they are running for office to push back.

For decades, Republicans have largely held sway over the white Christian electorate in American politics. But a cohort of ministers say they have grown frustrated enough with President Donald Trump, and particularly his administration’s immigration policies, that they are running as Democrats this fall in an effort to check his influence in Washington. “The Christians we’re hearing in Washington don’t reflect the Jesus of the Gospels,” said Adam Hamilton, one of the candidates, in an interview with AFP.

Hamilton leads a 24,000-member Methodist megachurch in a deeply conservative, rural part of Kansas, a profile that would typically align with a right-leaning Republican Christian voter base. Yet the 62-year-old, now running for the U.S. Senate, supports legal access to abortion and protections for LGBTQ rights as part of his campaign platform, alongside more traditionally conservative positions on fiscal responsibility and a strong military. Hamilton pointed to what he described as the “crassness and mean-spiritedness” of the Trump presidency as fundamentally at odds with the values he has spent decades preaching. “This is inconsistent with the values that I’ve preached for 36 years,” Hamilton said. “I want to stand up and be heard saying: ‘This is not OK.’”

Democrats have a long history of clergy entering politics, though that tradition has been concentrated predominantly among African American ministers, including Sen. Raphael Warnock of Georgia, who leads Atlanta’s Ebenezer Baptist Church, the congregation once led by Martin Luther King Jr. Among white Democratic clergy, however, congressional representation has been far rarer. The last white Democratic pastor to serve in Congress was Bob Edgar, a Methodist minister who represented Pennsylvania from 1975 to 1987.

That pattern appears to be shifting this election cycle. No fewer than seven white clergy members or ministers-in-training are running for congressional seats as Democrats in this year’s midterms, hailing from Iowa, Texas, Alaska, Arkansas, Kansas and Tennessee. Most are political newcomers, and three of the seven candidates are women. Despite their varied backgrounds, the candidates share a common goal of reclaiming religious language and scripture from Republican messaging, using Christian teaching instead to support more liberal policy positions on immigration and poverty.

Among the most prominent of these candidates is James Talarico, a 37-year-old Presbyterian seminarian running for a Senate seat in Texas, a state with a long history of Republican dominance. Talarico’s scripture-laden campaign speeches have reportedly helped him build significant support even within the conservative-leaning state. “You want to know what insults Jesus? Kicking the sick off health care while cutting the taxes of billionaires,” Talarico said during one campaign speech.

Part of the reason Republicans have maintained such a strong hold on white Christian voters, according to some within the Democratic Party, is that Democrats have gradually come to be identified less with the working class and more with a secular, educated elite, a shift that has made religious identity less prominent within the party’s public image. Indira Duggirala, co-chair of the Democratic National Committee’s Interfaith Council, acknowledged that gap directly. “There has been a vacuum in that religious space in Democratic politics,” Duggirala said, describing the emergence of this year’s crop of faith-oriented candidates as something that developed organically rather than through any centralized party strategy. “It’s OK to be a Democrat and be religious,” she told AFP, while stressing that she continues to believe government itself must remain secular.

For many of these candidates, along with a broader swath of both Democrats and Christians more generally, the rise of Trump’s MAGA movement and an accompanying strain of Christian nationalism has become a source of significant concern. Critics have pointed in particular to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth’s practice of holding prayer meetings at the Pentagon and his use of explicitly religious language to justify the ongoing U.S. military conflict with Iran, a pattern several of the Democratic clergy candidates have cited as emblematic of what they see as an inappropriate blending of religious authority and government power.

Robb Ryerse, a 51-year-old evangelical pastor running for a congressional seat in Arkansas, another reliably red state, framed the stakes in stark terms. “Christian nationalism is one of the biggest threats to democracy in the United States,” Ryerse said. Despite that assessment, Ryerse and others among this year’s slate of Democratic clergy candidates say they remain motivated to run precisely because they believe they can help correct course. “We need people of faith to stand up and say the United States has a separation of church and state,” Ryerse said, describing part of his campaign’s mission as helping to “clean up the mess” he believes fellow white Christians on the political right have created.

Hamilton, for his part, has framed his Senate bid in historic terms. Should he win in November, he would become the first Kansas Democrat elected to the U.S. Senate since 1932. Hamilton expressed confidence that his campaign has tapped into a genuine appetite for change within the state. “It’s time,” Hamilton said. “I think we’re going to do it. There are a lot of people out there who are saying we need change.”

The broader effort by these Democratic clergy candidates represents a notable, if still relatively small-scale, attempt to reshape how religious identity factors into American electoral politics heading into the fall. Whether their campaigns ultimately succeed in reliably conservative states such as Texas, Kansas and Arkansas remains an open question, but their emergence underscores a broader debate within both parties over how Christian faith should intersect with policy positions on issues including immigration, healthcare, abortion and the separation of church and state, a debate likely to remain a visible thread running through the 2026 midterm campaign season as November approaches.

Conor McGregor broke his silence Sunday after his long-awaited UFC comeback ended in devastating fashion at UFC 329, denying he entered his fight against Max Holloway with any pre-existing injury and describing the aftermath of a suspected torn ACL as “hell.”

McGregor’s return to the octagon, his first fight in five years, lasted just 69 seconds. The 37-year-old Irishman opened the bout by rushing across the mat and throwing a jumping switch kick, missing his target before attempting another kick and landing awkwardly on his right knee. He briefly tried to fight through the injury as Holloway pressed the attack, but referee Mike Beltran stopped the contest at 1 minute, 9 seconds into the first round after Holloway landed a series of unanswered strikes on a visibly compromised McGregor. Holloway was awarded the win by TKO. A visibly distraught McGregor was consoled by ring announcer Bruce Buffer before leaving the cage and exiting T-Mobile Arena, declining the use of crutches.

UFC doctors suspected McGregor had suffered a torn ACL in his right knee, though an MRI was still needed to confirm the diagnosis. UFC President and CEO Dana White said he shared that suspicion when speaking to reporters at the event’s post-fight news conference. “We’re assuming blown ACL. I’m not a doctor, but that’s what I figured when I saw it, and doctors think the same thing too,” White said.

McGregor did not speak with media following the fight but issued a statement on social media hours later, firmly denying speculation that had emerged suggesting he may have entered the bout already carrying an injury. “My head gasket is gone. Destroyed,” McGregor wrote. “I had no injury / injuries going into the fight. I was throwing kicks, planted and jumping, all throughout camp as well as backstage before the fight. This came out of nowhere. I am beyond dark here. I can only describe it as hell.”

McGregor continued in a follow-up post, pushing back further against the narrative that had circulated online. “I was so sharp and so ready for this fight I cannot believe what has happened. The talk of me being off while walking in to the fight is nonsense. I was calm, ready, and confident. I am in shock what has taken place.” He closed the statement with a promise to return. “The devil is literally staring at me right in front of my face here. I am not engaging. I will be at church tomorrow. I will overcome this. I will not be deterred. I will return.”

The speculation McGregor was responding to stemmed from broadcast footage that appeared to show him taking an awkward step and limping slightly while removing his shoe during his pre-fight preparation point check. McGregor’s camp echoed his denial, telling reporters they had been “super careful” heading into the bout and that McGregor was “100 percent” healthy beforehand, with “not a bump, not a bruise.”

White also directly rejected the theory that McGregor had entered the fight already injured, pointing to the massive online attention surrounding McGregor’s pre-fight face-off with Holloway as evidence any existing issue would likely have been noticed. “Just on my accounts, the face off is at 80 million views, right? So, if there was a preexisting injury, somebody would have noticed it. If he was limping, put his shoes on, he ran right at him,” White said. “I don’t think there was. Anything is possible, but he sure didn’t look like it.” White separately acknowledged the physical toll of McGregor’s extended layoff heading into the fight. “Everybody who knows anything about the fight business, it’s been a big topic of discussion leading up to this fight: Five years off in this sport is rough,” White said. “Great card. Unbelievable. The Paddy Pimblett thing right before. You just feel it all in the air. Here we go. I was expecting at least a one-round war. Who knew what Conor was capable of as far as cardio or whatever else after a five-year layoff? Well, there you go.”

Holloway, who improved his record with the win and was making his official welterweight debut, expressed sympathy for McGregor following the fight rather than triumph. “Right now, I’m just praying for the guy,” Holloway said. He described urging the referee to stop the contest once it became clear McGregor could not continue effectively. “All jokes aside, as a human being… even when I was in there, you could see me telling the ref, ‘Bro, this guy is done, just let it go.’” Holloway said the referee later thanked him for pushing for the stoppage. “The referee was telling me, ‘Bro, thank you for pushing me, because it was a hard spot. He had a hard feeling.’” Holloway also recounted McGregor’s own insistence on continuing despite the injury. “And Conor’s crazy. Conor’s like, ‘Fight! Fight!’ I’m like, ‘You’re f—— crazy.’”

Saturday’s result marked McGregor’s second consecutive loss and came in a fight that broke the UFC’s record for highest-grossing live gate, according to figures cited by White ahead of the event. It was McGregor’s first appearance in the octagon since suffering a severe leg break in his 2021 trilogy bout against Dustin Poirier at UFC 264. His comeback had been delayed multiple times in the years since, including a planned June 2024 fight against Michael Chandler that McGregor withdrew from due to a broken pinky toe. Later that year, McGregor was also found liable in a civil case for the sexual assault of Nikita Hand, adding further complications to his path back to competition.

Notably, Saturday’s knee injury occurred in McGregor’s right leg, a different joint from the left ACL he tore in his original 2013 bout against Holloway, an injury he had surgically repaired and returned from within 11 months at the time.

As of this weekend, McGregor had not provided a specific recovery timeline beyond his vow to return, and the extent of the injury remained pending formal confirmation through imaging. The setback leaves McGregor’s UFC future uncertain once again, just as his long-anticipated comeback appeared poised to headline International Fight Week with one of the promotion’s most closely watched matchups in recent memory.

Meta has disabled its newly launched Muse Image artificial intelligence generator just days after its debut, reversing course following sharp criticism from Hollywood’s biggest talent agency and its largest performers’ union over the tool’s automatic opt-in policy for public Instagram accounts.

The company announced Friday that the feature was “no longer available” on Instagram, acknowledging the backlash directly in a statement posted to the platform. “Earlier this week, we announced that one way for people to generate images in Meta AI is by @-mentioning public Instagram accounts that they want to reference,” Meta said. “Our intent was to provide a useful creative tool and to give people control over whether their public content could be referenced in this way. We’ve heard the feedback that this feature missed the mark, so it’s no longer available.”

Muse Image, developed by Meta Superintelligence Labs, launched Tuesday and was integrated into the Meta AI chatbot, marketed by the company as a “creative partner that knows your world.” At its core, the tool allowed any user to tag a public or unprotected Instagram account, instantly making that account’s content available for the AI to generate new images or “remixes” of, with the resulting images then remaining online permanently. The feature applied automatically to all public Instagram accounts belonging to users 18 or older, with private accounts and those belonging to users under 18 excluded, though public account holders had to actively opt out rather than opt in to avoid being included.

That opt-out structure quickly drew fire from talent and privacy advocates. Creative Artists Agency, the powerhouse Hollywood talent agency representing clients including Zoe Saldaña, Tom Cruise and Charlize Theron, issued a statement Wednesday calling on Meta to overhaul the feature. “No one’s name, image, likeness, voice, or creative work should be used by any third party, including AI models, without clear, documented consent,” a CAA spokesperson said at the time. “True innovation puts creators first: respecting their rights, protecting their livelihoods, and giving them real control, not handing it over to platforms.” CAA further pressed Meta to shift the default settings entirely. “We call on Meta to make protection the default on Muse Image, not the exception, and enable individuals to opt-in if they want to allow usage of their image or likeness for AI content creation.”

Meta initially pushed back on those concerns rather than immediately reversing the feature. “We built Muse Image with strong controls and safety guardrails from day one,” the company said in response to CAA’s Wednesday statement. “Private accounts and those belonging to users under 18 are automatically excluded and adult users with public accounts can opt-out with just a couple clicks. We will take action against any content that violates our Community Standards.”

SAG-AFTRA, the union representing U.S. film and television performers, escalated the pressure Thursday, sharing instructions with members on how to navigate Instagram’s settings to opt out of the tool. “Meta now lets anyone use your Instagram photos in AI images without your consent,” the guild wrote in a social media post. “SAG-AFTRA recommends that #SagAftraMembers (and all Instagram users) opt-OUT of Meta’s new AI image generation tool, Muse Image. Take action to protect your likeness.” The union went further in a separate statement, calling the feature’s design fundamentally flawed. “Anything other than a clear and conspicuous OPT-IN for these types of uses of Instagram users’ images is unacceptable, and an utter miscalculation of public sentiment regarding the obvious dangers and harms inherent in such use.”

Opposition to the tool spread quickly across Meta’s own platforms in the days following its launch. According to Newsweek, a video posted by content creator Barrett Pall explaining how to opt out of the feature drew more than 1.5 million views on Instagram Reels, while Emmy-nominated actor Hannah Einbinder also publicly criticized the tool through her own social media accounts.

Meta’s Friday reversal drew praise from both organizations that had pushed for the change. CAA said in a statement, “We commend Meta for its swift decision to remove the Muse Image feature. Putting individual rights and consent at the forefront is essential to building responsible technology. We look forward to ongoing conversations to ensure creators stay protected as technology evolves.” SAG-AFTRA offered a similarly approving response. “With the dangers of nonconsensual digital replicas well known to all, a feature that encouraged that behavior is unwise,” the union said. “We appreciate its discontinuance. It is the responsible thing to do.”

Muse Image’s swift rise and fall closely echoes a similar controversy that unfolded around OpenAI’s Sora video-generation app, which launched with limited intellectual property protections and quickly produced a wave of infringing content, including AI-generated depictions of recognizable celebrities and copyrighted characters, before OpenAI ultimately walked back its initial approach and later discontinued the feature entirely, according to Variety.

CAA’s public stance on Muse Image has drawn some scrutiny of its own, given the agency’s simultaneous push into digital-first talent representation, including its own AI Vault program, which archives its members’ likenesses for long-term use, and its work with digital content creators such as Dhar Mann on multi-platform brand partnerships. Even so, CAA has maintained that its objection centers specifically on the absence of clear, documented consent rather than opposition to AI-driven creative tools broadly. “Artists deserve to decide if and how their likeness and work is used, with consent and the ability to set their own terms,” a CAA spokesperson said. “This means letting creators impose restrictions, monitor usage, and prevent unauthorized endorsements or exploitation. Responsible AI requires clear disclosures and swift removal of unauthorized content.”

The controversy unfolds against a broader backdrop of debate in Washington and Hollywood over how AI should be regulated. SAG-AFTRA has endorsed the Trump administration’s broader AI policy framework, which calls on Congress to enact legislation addressing parental controls, intellectual property rights protections, First Amendment considerations, AI workforce development, expanded data center energy generation and the removal of legal barriers seen as limiting AI innovation. Last month, President Trump signed an executive order establishing a voluntary framework under which AI companies would provide the federal government access to new models for a 30-day review period ahead of public release.

As of Friday, Meta had not indicated whether it plans to reintroduce a revised version of Muse Image with different consent settings, and the company’s statement did not specify a timeline for any future rollout. The episode adds to a growing pattern of major technology companies facing rapid public pushback over AI tools that use individuals’ likenesses without explicit, opt-in consent, a dynamic that is likely to continue shaping how tech firms design and launch consumer-facing generative AI products going forward.