Connect with us
DAPA Banner
DAPA Coin
DAPA
COIN PAYMENT ASSET
PRIVACY · BLOCKDAG · HOMOMORPHIC ENCRYPTION · RUST
ElGamal Encrypted MINE DAPA
🚫 GENESIS SOLD OUT
DAPAPAY COMING

Business

Six Host Countries, Three Continents and a Centenary Celebration Ahead

Published

on

Cristiano Ronaldo

Just one day after Spain lifted the 2026 World Cup trophy in New Jersey, soccer’s global governing body is already looking ahead to a tournament unlike any before it: the 2030 FIFA World Cup, which will be staged across six countries spanning three continents to mark the competition’s 100th anniversary.

According to FIFA’s proposed schedule, the tournament will open with a series of centenary matches held in South America before shifting to its three primary host nations in Europe and Africa, a format that will make 2030 the first men’s World Cup ever played across three continents.

A tournament rooted in history

Spain, Portugal and Morocco will serve as the tournament’s main co-hosts, staging the majority of the competition’s matches. To honor the World Cup’s centennial, Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay will each host a single opening-round match before the remainder of the tournament shifts entirely to the three principal host countries.

Advertisement

The symbolism behind each South American host nation’s involvement is deliberate. Uruguay will host a match in recognition of staging the first-ever World Cup in 1930, while Argentina’s fixture will acknowledge its role as that inaugural tournament’s runner-up. Paraguay, meanwhile, will host a game as the home of CONMEBOL, South America’s soccer confederation and the only continental football governing body that existed at the time of the first World Cup.

Under FIFA’s proposed calendar, the centenary matches in Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay are scheduled for June 8 and 9, 2030, with the main tournament’s opening ceremony and first matches following in Morocco, Portugal and Spain on June 13 and 14. Teams competing in the South American centenary matches will be given extra time to travel and prepare before beginning their group-stage campaigns in Europe and Africa. The remaining teams in those same groups are expected to begin play on June 15 and 16, with a second round of group matches following on June 21 and 22. FIFA has not yet released a complete match calendar, and the federation has indicated the World Cup final is expected to take place July 21, 2030, though that date has not been formally confirmed.

Automatic qualifiers already locked in

Six nations have already secured automatic qualification for the 2030 tournament by virtue of their hosting roles: Spain, Portugal and Morocco as the three primary co-hosts, along with Uruguay, Argentina and Paraguay through their centenary match hosting duties. The remaining 42 spots in the 48-team field will be determined through FIFA’s continental qualifying tournaments over the next several years.

Advertisement

Could the tournament grow even larger?

While the 2030 World Cup is currently set to retain the 48-team format that debuted at this year’s tournament in the United States, Canada and Mexico, FIFA President Gianni Infantino has signaled the organization may explore expanding the competition even further, to 64 teams.

Speaking with Swiss outlet Bluewin, Infantino called the expanded 48-team format a “huge success,” crediting it with giving more nations the chance to compete on the sport’s biggest stage and helping grow the game’s global reach. He pointed to strong showings from smaller footballing nations during the 2026 tournament as evidence that wider participation benefits the sport overall. Asked directly whether a 64-team World Cup could become reality, Infantino said the proposal “will be examined and discussed” going forward, though no formal decision or timeline has been announced.

A century of growth for the World Cup

Advertisement

The 2030 edition will arrive almost exactly a century after the World Cup’s origins, which trace back to the success of men’s soccer tournaments at the 1924 and 1928 Olympic Games, both won by Uruguay. At the time, Olympic football fell under the jurisdiction of the International Olympic Committee, prompting FIFA to create a standalone international tournament specifically for national soccer teams.

The 1924 Olympic final in Paris drew a crowd of nearly 50,000 spectators as Uruguay defeated Switzerland 3-0 to claim gold. Four years later, Uruguay successfully defended its Olympic title with a 2-1 win over Argentina, a result that helped convince FIFA officials that a dedicated World Cup tournament could succeed on its own.

FIFA formally approved plans for the inaugural World Cup in May 1928 and selected Uruguay as host, both in recognition of the country’s back-to-back Olympic titles and to coincide with the 100th anniversary of Uruguayan independence in 1930. That first tournament kicked off in July 1930 with 13 participating nations, several of which traveled from Europe by ship to compete. Uruguay went on to defeat Argentina 4-2 in the final at Montevideo’s Estadio Centenario, becoming the first nation crowned men’s World Cup champions.

Since that modest beginning, the tournament has grown dramatically in scale, expanding from 13 teams in 1930 to 32 teams by 1998 and, most recently, to 48 teams for this year’s tournament across North America. The 2030 edition will mark a full century since that first competition and stand as the first men’s World Cup ever contested across six countries and three continents simultaneously.

Advertisement

Looking further ahead: 2034 in Saudi Arabia

Beyond 2030, FIFA has already confirmed the host of the following World Cup. The 2034 tournament will be staged entirely within Saudi Arabia, which FIFA confirmed as host in December 2024 after emerging as the only country to submit a bid for that edition. Unlike the multi-continental 2030 format, the 2034 World Cup will return to a single-host-nation model. FIFA has not yet announced specific dates or a match schedule for that tournament, leaving further details to be finalized in the years ahead as the federation first turns its full attention to executing the historic six-country centenary celebration planned for 2030.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Business

Trump’s OBBBA saved millions of manufacturing jobs, NAM report says

Published

on

Trump's OBBBA saved millions of manufacturing jobs, NAM report says

A group representing America’s manufacturers on Tuesday released a report marking one year since the enactment of the 2025 tax law that includes examples of the legislation’s impact on the manufacturing sector in all 50 states.

The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA) was passed by Republicans in Congress and signed into law by President Donald Trump last July, and the legislation contained a number of provisions aimed at boosting the manufacturing industry – such as 100% expensing of newly built factories and immediate depreciation of machinery – and preventing tax hikes.

Advertisement

The National Association of Manufacturers (NAM) released an analysis that estimated the number of jobs protected by the provisions of the OBBBA, along with the amount of economic growth and wages it preserved. It also chronicled how a manufacturer in each state used the tax law.

“Tax policy is far more than numbers on a spreadsheet and these stories – across all 50 states – show the real-world impact of pro-growth policies that have given manufacturers the confidence to invest, hire, raise wages and expand facilities,” said National Association of Manufacturers CEO Jay Timmons.

TRUMP VISITS MACK TRUCKS PLANT IN BATTLEGROUND PENNSYLVANIA DISTRICT TO TOUT ECONOMIC AGENDA AS MIDTERMS LOOM

Workers at a GM auto assembly plant

NAM’s report highlighted the tax law’s impact on jobs, economic growth and wages in all 50 states. (Emily Elconin/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Timmons added the tax reform law is “one of the most consequential pieces of legislation in a generation,” and said that “Congress and the administration delivered the permanent, pro-growth tax code manufacturers needed to invest in their people, purchase new equipment and plan confidently for the future.”

Advertisement

NAM’s analysis found that in California, the law saved 708,000 jobs, $134 billion in GDP and $67 billion in wages – the most in each category among the 50 states. Commercial helicopter manufacturer Robinson Helicopter said it’s taking advantage of immediate research and development expensing to deploy new R88 helicopters as control centers for fire surveillance drones.

“These types of innovative solutions require a significant amount of research and development spend,” said Will Fulton, vice president of business development at Robinson Helicopter, adding that the immediate R&D deduction “accelerates our ability to innovate and increases the ability with which we can bring these property and lifesaving innovations to market.”

TRUMP TURNS NATO SPENDING FIGHT INTO WIN FOR US DEFENSE COMPANIES

Belvidere auto assembly

The OBBBA made it easier for manufacturers to deduct R&D expenses as well as new capital expenditures. (Michael Tercha/Chicago Tribune/Tribune News Service via Getty Images)

Texas’ totals ranked the second highest at 547,000 jobs, $107 billion in GDP and $51 billion in wages saved by the OBBBA, per NAM’s analysis. WilliamsRDM said the tax law’s R&D expensing allowed it to continue to invest in engineering, prototyping, testing and design improvements to deploy new tech for aerospace, defense, fire suppression, energy and security firms.

Advertisement

Florida, which NAM estimated had 399,000 jobs and $36 billion in wages saved by the OBBBA, has seen Johnson & Johnson invest more than $1 billion to expand operations in Jacksonville.

J&J’s chief technical operations and risk officer, Kathy Wengel, said that the “investments reflect our sustained commitment to advancing American innovation, enabled by a strong and stable corporate tax rate.”

GOOGLE PARTNERS ON AI TRAINING FOR THOUSANDS OF AMERICAN MANUFACTURING WORKERS

US manufacturing

Manufacturers cited the newfound certainty of the tax law as giving them confidence to invest. (Andrew Magnum/Bloomberg via Getty Images)

Snap-On CEO and NAM Vice Chair for Tax and Finance Policy Nick Pinchuk said that he’s seen firsthand how “long-term tax uncertainty translates into workforce certainty,” adding that the law was “an investment in the American worker.”

Advertisement

“It reaffirms, for all to see, the critical importance of manufacturing to our nation’s future and it assures that prosperous tomorrow by giving manufacturers, including small- and family-owned businesses, a significant boost to their capabilities and the confidence to making lasting investments in their people – to recruit, train and retain skilled workers, strengthen career pathways, and create good paying jobs in communities across the country,” Pinchuk said.

“When I first started drafting the One, Big, Beautiful Bill, I made it clear: permanent, pro-growth tax policy was a top priority. If we were truly going to make a lasting impact for manufacturers, we had to deliver legislation that gave them the confidence to invest in equipment, hire workers, and plan for the long term — and that’s exactly what we did. By preventing a massive tax hike and locking in permanent, pro-growth tax policies, we gave manufacturers the certainty they needed to grow. One year later, we’re seeing the results, with success stories from manufacturers in all 50 states.”

House Ways and Means Committee Chairman Jason Smith, R-Mo., said in a statement that when drafting the OBBBA, his top priority was a “permanent, pro-growth tax policy.”

“If we were truly going to make a lasting impact for manufacturers, we had to deliver legislation that gave them the confidence to invest in equipment, hire workers, and plan for the long term – and that’s exactly what we did,” he said. “By preventing a massive tax hike and locking in permanent, pro-growth tax policies, we gave manufacturers the certainty they needed to grow. One year later, we’re seeing the results, with success stories from manufacturers in all 50 states.”

Advertisement

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Senate Finance Committee Chairman Mike Crapo, R-Idaho, added in a statement that, “One year in, the results are clear – the Working Families Tax Cuts are strengthening our economy, boosting American manufacturing and creating greater opportunities for workers for years to come.”

Continue Reading

Business

Melbourne Cup field awaits Secret Harbour voters

Published

on

Melbourne Cup field awaits Secret Harbour voters

Voters in the Secret Harbour by-election will have to wade through the names of 16 candidates – including several perennial wannabe politicians – when they go to polling booths on August 29.

Continue Reading

Business

SBI Funds shares list below GMP expectations, but Street sees up to 23% upside

Published

on

SBI Funds shares list below GMP expectations, but Street sees up to 23% upside
SBI Funds Management shares made a decent D-Street debut on Tuesday, listing 6.85% higher than the IPO price at Rs 613.30 apiece on the NSE, with analysts advising allotted investors to hold the stock despite the listing falling short of grey market expectations.

The AMC’s shares listed at Rs 610 on the BSE, a 6.27% premium to the IPO price of Rs 574, giving the company a market capitalisation of Rs 1.24 lakh crore at debut.

SBI Funds Management IPO GMP

Despite the decent debut, SBI Funds Management’s listing fell short of grey market expectations. Ahead of listing, the unlisted shares of SBI Funds Management were trading with a grey market premium (GMP) of 16-18%, according to data on sites tracking the grey market.

Read More: SBI Funds Management Share Price Live

Advertisement

The much-awaited listing of SBI Funds Management comes after its IPO drew robust investor demand between July 14 and July 16, with the issue being subscribed nearly 42 times. Qualified Institutional Buyers (QIBs) led the response, subscribing their quota more than 140 times, while the portions reserved for Non-Institutional Investors (NIIs) and Retail Individual Investors (RIIs) were subscribed 22.5 times and nearly 4 times, respectively.

The IPO, launched to raise Rs 9,795 crore at a price band of Rs 545-574 per share, entirely comprised an offer for sale (OFS) of 17.10 crore shares by existing shareholders State Bank of India (SBI) and Amundi. Since there was no fresh issue, SBI Funds Management will not receive any proceeds from the IPO, with the entire amount going to the selling shareholders.
Here’s what brokerages and analysts are advising investors to do after the much-awaited listing of SBI Funds Management on Dalal Street.

Emkay on SBI Funds Management shares

Before the listing, Emkay Global Financial Services had initiated coverage on SBI Funds Management shares with a ‘Buy’ call and a target price of Rs 750 apiece, implying 31% upside from the IPO price of Rs 574 apiece. The brokerage said that its positive view rests on three pillars.
The first among them is SBI’s brand and distribution, coupled with significant under-penetration of SBI MF within the SBI Bank channel. Secondly, the sustained shift in asset mix toward higher-yielding assets such as equity and alternate investments (AIF/PMS) is likely to support revenue yields. Lastly, the economies-of-scale-led operating leverage is expected to drive a 17% EBITDA CAGR over FY26-29, according to the brokerage.
“As the savings and investment needs of Indians evolve, the middle class is increasingly embracing mutual funds as its core investment vehicle, and SBI AMC has all the ingredients to become ‘the asset manager to every Indian,’ just as its parent has become ‘the banker to every Indian’,” Emkay said.

Also read | SBI Funds Management gets 2 buy calls before listing. Why Equirus, Emkay see up to 31% upside

Equirus Securities on SBI Funds Management shares

Equirus Securities initiated coverage on SBI Funds Management shares with a ‘Long’ rating and a March 2027 target price of Rs 675. The target implies an upside of about 18% from the issue price of Rs 574. The brokerage noted that the company is one of the strongest franchises in India’s asset management industry, backed by scale, SBI’s distribution network, sticky SIP flows and strong profitability.

Advertisement

It believes that SBI Funds Management is well placed to benefit from India’s financialisation trend, as more household savings move into mutual funds, SIPs and market-linked products.

What other analysts are suggesting?

Analysts said investors who were allotted shares in SBI Funds Management IPO can either book listing gains or stay invested, depending on their holding period. “We expect the stock to list at 15% premium, and investors with a short-term horizon may consider booking profits if they plan to participate in upcoming IPOs. Given the company’s strong fundamentals, long-term investors can consider holding the stock for 1-2 years for healthy returns,” said Geetanjali Kedia, IPO expert at SPTulsian Investment Advisers.

Vaqarjaved Khan, senior fundamental analyst at Angel One, meanwhile had suggested that allotted shareholders can consider holding the stock due to its strong fundamentals, healthy margins, ROEs, and leadership in the AMC segment. “However, fresh investors should avoid chasing the stock at elevated post-listing levels,” he said.

Narendra Solanki, head of fundamental research at Anand Rathi Share and Stock Brokers, also had said that investors who were allotted shares in the IPO should consider holding the stock for the long term, given its strong growth prospects.

Advertisement

Also read | SBI Funds pays razor-thin banker fees on top India IPO of 2026

(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Continue Reading

Business

searches spike ahead of August deadline

Published

on

searches spike ahead of August deadline

Britain’s business owners are quietly Googling their way through VAT season. Searches for “VAT definition” have jumped 23 per cent in the past week, new research from Hiscox shows, as firms with VAT quarters ending 30 June face a 7 August filing deadline.

Searches for “VAT meaning” are up 11 per cent over the same period, and the tax generates 17,500 definition-related searches every month, enough to make it one of the UK’s most searched business acronyms. Only KPI, on 60,800 monthly searches, along with the likes of GDPR, CRM and EBITDA, rank higher.

The confusion runs deeper than one tax. More than half (52 per cent) of business owners admit they do not feel confident in their understanding of common business and financial terminology. When they hit an unfamiliar term, 16 per cent say they feel frustrated, 13 per cent intimidated and 12 per cent overwhelmed.

Where do they turn? Over two-thirds (69 per cent) reach for a search engine. Some 16 per cent use social media platforms such as TikTok and LinkedIn for short-form explanations, a figure that rises to 31 per cent among under-30s. And one in six (15 per cent) now ask AI tools such as ChatGPT to decode unfamiliar concepts.

That last habit comes with a health warning. “AI tools can help to provide quick explanations, but they’re not always consistent with how information is sourced or explained,” cautions Nick Thornhill, Direct and Partnerships Director at Hiscox. “As these tools are becoming more widely used in day-to-day business decision-making, it becomes increasingly important that business owners cross-check their understanding, especially when terminology feeds into financial, operational or compliance decisions.”

Advertisement

The stakes are not trivial. HMRC’s latest figures put the total tax gap for 2024/25 at £59.2 billion, with VAT accounting for a fifth of that shortfall, and failure to take reasonable care and simple error the two biggest behavioural causes. Small businesses represent the largest slice of the gap, at 62 per cent.

Getting it wrong is expensive at an individual level too. Inaccuracies judged to show a lack of reasonable care can attract penalties of up to 30 per cent of the extra tax due.

Clare March, founder of Her Business Counts, argues the real problem is not remembering what the acronym stands for but understanding what it means in practice. Misjudging VAT’s impact on cash flow, she warns, can lead to decisions that “look fine on the surface but quietly put you in a really difficult position.”

For SMEs, VAT is rarely just an admin line. The tax shapes behaviour to the point that firms are deliberately curbing growth to stay under the £90,000 registration threshold, and it remains politically live, with ministers scrapping VAT on electricity bills only this month. Add the demands of Making Tax Digital and the shift towards e-invoicing, and the terminology burden keeps growing.

Advertisement

In response, Hiscox has partnered with business mentor Jonathan Cooper on four tips for building financial confidence, including finding trusted sources of guidance and avoiding common mistakes, and has launched an interactive quiz letting owners test themselves on the UK’s most searched acronyms.

“Business owners are expected to know and use a wide range of terms across finance, operations and compliance on a daily basis, but our research suggests that many are still having to look them up as they go,” says Thornhill. “Business language can be complicated and having an understanding of these terms is important for decision-making and communication with advisors, investors and teams.”

One note of reassurance for anyone panicking about 7 August: not every business files that day. VAT deadlines depend on your accounting period, and returns are normally due one calendar month and seven days after the quarter ends. Checking your own date, rather than Googling someone else’s, is a sensible place to start.


Amy Ingham

Amy Ingham

Amy Ingham is a reporter at Business Matters, covering UK business news with a focus on breaking news, business policy, late payments and insolvency. She joined the magazine in 2026 after completing the NCTJ Diploma in Journalism at Harlow College’s journalism school. Her recent reporting includes British Steel’s nationalisation and its impact on SME suppliers, the decline in late payments by large firms, and Insolvency Service director disqualifications. Reach her at aingham@cbmeg.co.uk.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Karur Vysya Bank shares soar 11% after stellar Q1 results. What investors should know

Published

on

Karur Vysya Bank shares soar 11% after stellar Q1 results. What investors should know
Shares of Karur Vysya Bank rallied as much as 10.6% to their day’s high of Rs 333 on the BSE on Tuesday after the lender reported a 44.92% YoY jump in net profit to Rs 756 crore in the first quarter, compared with Rs 521 crore a year earlier.

Pre-provision operating profit (PPOP) rose 36.15% YoY to Rs 1,096 crore from Rs 805 crore, while net interest income increased 31.76% YoY to Rs 1,423 crore from Rs 1,080 crore.

Net interest margin (NIM) improved to 4.34% from 3.86% in the year-ago quarter. The cost of deposits declined by 32 bps to 5.45% from 5.77%, while the yield on advances increased by 11 bps to 10.11% from 10%, the company said in a regulatory filing.

Commission and fee income rose 7.57% YoY to Rs 270 crore from Rs 251 crore. Operating expenses increased to Rs 769 crore from Rs 721 crore in the corresponding quarter last year, while the cost-to-income ratio improved to 41.24% from 47.24%.

Advertisement

Karur Vysya Bank asset quality

On asset quality, gross non-performing assets (GNPA) stood at 0.74% of gross advances as of June 30, 2026, compared with 0.66% a year earlier, though the ratio was lower by 1 bp QoQ. In absolute terms, GNPA stood at Rs 772 crore, up from Rs 593 crore as of June 30, 2025. Net NPA (NNPA) remained at 0.19%, unchanged from a year earlier, while the absolute figure stood at Rs 196 crore compared with Rs 170 crore. The provision coverage ratio (PCR) stood at 96.21% as of June 30, 2026, compared with 96.76% a year earlier.

Karur Vysya Bank’s total business stood at Rs 2.27 lakh crore as of June 30, 2026, up 15.94% YoY from Rs 1.96 lakh crore a year earlier, an increase of Rs 31,243 crore. Total deposits rose 14.94% YoY to Rs 1.22 lakh crore from Rs 1.06 lakh crore, while total advances grew 17.13% YoY to Rs 1.04 lakh crore from Rs 89,374 crore, an increase of Rs 15,306 crore.
Also read:SBI Funds Management shares list at 7% premium over IPO price

Karur Vysya Q1 management commentary

Ramesh Babu B, Managing Director and CEO of Karur Vysya Bank, said the bank’s performance indicators were in line with its earlier guidance. He said the bank had front-loaded growth in the first quarter of the financial year, in line with its approach in recent years. He added that consistent performance across growth, profitability and asset quality reflected the strength of the bank’s performance since the start of the year.
(Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)

Continue Reading

Business

Ryanair CEO says Boeing engine damage, smashed window caused by foreign object

Published

on

Ryanair window dislodges mid-flight, passenger partially sucked outside

Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary said on Monday that an initial finding from an investigation into a broken window incident earlier this month suggested “foreign object damage” and that the problem was caused by the aircraft’s age or servicing conditions.

“Initial indication would suggest it looks like a foreign object damage to the engine on takeoff at Thessaloniki, but we don’t have, we can’t say that definitively,” O’Leary told analysts after Ryanair’s results for the April-June quarter.

Advertisement

O’Leary said the aircraft was 18 years old and that the engine had been fully serviced and overhauled within the last two years.

WHY A BLOWN-OUT PLANE WINDOW NEARLY SUCKED A PASSENGER OUTSIDE AT 16,000 FEET

Ryanair CEO Michael O'Leary

Ryanair CEO Michael O’Leary said the aircraft was 18 years old and that the engine had been fully serviced and overhauled within the last two years. (Chris J. Ratcliffe/Bloomberg via Getty Images / Getty Images)

He also said that a draft report on the incident would be released in under a month, with a more detailed report to follow.

On July 10, a piece of a Boeing 737’s engine broke off the aircraft and smashed into a window shortly after takeoff from Thessaloniki, Greece, en route to Memmingen, Germany, according to video footage and the Federal Aviation Administration.

Advertisement

The plane lost pressure and was forced to make an emergency landing.

RYANAIR ‘RELUCTANTLY’ ENDS MANDATORY FEE FOR PARENTS TO SIT WITH CHILDREN AMID INVESTIGATION

A Ryanair jet in Thessaloniki, Greece

A passenger was partly sucked out of the aircraft, but his wife and other passengers were able to grab him and pull him back inside. (Reuters/Alexandros Avramidis/File Photo / Reuters Photos)

A passenger was partly sucked out of the aircraft during the incident, but his wife and other passengers were able to grab him and pull him back inside.

The 61-year-old passenger was hospitalized after he suffered neck and shoulder injuries as well as friction burns.

Advertisement

Flight records show the aircraft, which was delivered new to Ryanair in 2008, had been climbing past 15,000 feet about six minutes after takeoff before then descending to about 6,000 feet. The aircraft remained at the lower altitude for about 30 minutes to burn fuel before returning to Thessaloniki about an hour after departure, according to flight-tracking site Flightradar24.

Ryanair Boeing

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the incident. (Photo by Nicolas Economou/NurPhoto via Getty Images / Getty Images)

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

The National Transportation Safety Board is investigating the incident.

If damage to the aircraft was caused by an external object, it could reduce Boeing’s and Ryanair’s responsibilities in the incident.

Advertisement

Reuters contributed to this report.

Continue Reading

Business

Rightcharge named Visa’s home charging reimbursement partner

Published

on

Rightcharge named Visa's home charging reimbursement partner

British EV charging specialist Rightcharge has been certified as Visa’s only recommended home charging reimbursement partner in Europe, a tie-up that tackles the problem fuel cards were never built to solve: paying drivers back for the electricity they buy at home.

The numbers explain why Visa went looking. Data from Rightcharge’s fleet platform shows just 27 per cent of EV fleet charging spend goes through the public network. The other 73 per cent happens at home, typically overnight, on the driver’s own energy bill.

For fleet suppliers, and the thousands of UK businesses that rely on them, that split is the awkward truth of electrification. A fuel card only ever had to work at the petrol station. An electric fleet charges on the road and on the driveway, and any supplier solving just one side leaves most of its customers’ charging spend unmanaged.

Visa covers the public side through Visa Fleet 2.0, its open-loop payment infrastructure for fleet and mobility, offering real-time tracking, spend controls and acceptance wherever Visa is taken. The home side has historically been harder. Legacy fuel card systems were never designed for home energy billing, leaving fleet managers to verify costs manually, driver by driver.

Rightcharge’s platform closes that gap. It integrates with each driver’s home energy tariff to calculate the exact cost of every charging session, reimburses drivers automatically through a direct payment to their energy bill, and gives fleet managers confidence that only the work vehicle is being charged.

Advertisement

Getting the sums right is not a trivial concern. HMRC’s advisory electric rate currently stands at 7p per mile for home charging against 15p for public charging, a gap that makes the driveway comfortably the cheapest place to run an electric fleet, provided the reimbursement is accurate.

Certification under the Visa Ready for Fleet programme validates Rightcharge’s platform against Visa’s standards for functionality, integration and security. It also puts the firm in front of Visa’s global network of issuers and fleet mobility providers, which the company says will accelerate the rollout of accurate home charging reimbursement across UK fleets.

For fleet managers, the combined offering promises accurate reimbursement for every home session and real-time visibility across the fleet. For drivers, it means no out-of-pocket costs and no expense claims, wherever they plug in.

“We’re witnessing a rapid transition across Europe as fleets move from diesel to electric. The technology that fleets use to pay is transitioning with it. We realise that Visa will play a major role as a public charging payment platform and we’re proud to offer fleet suppliers the Rightcharge platform in parallel to manage payments for charging at home. Joining Visa Ready for Fleet also gives us the opportunity to work with a broader ecosystem of fleet, payments and mobility partners, supporting our ambitions to expand our reach across Europe,” said Freddie Winterbotham, Head of Strategic Partnerships at Rightcharge.

Advertisement

Neil Halls, Head of Fleet & Mobility at Visa, commented: “Through the Visa Ready for Fleet programme, we’re building a network of partners who can offer a comprehensive range of solutions tailored to our fleet and mobility clients. Rightcharge’s expertise in home charging reimbursement fills a critical gap in the ecosystem. We look forward to working together to help more UK fleets make the move to electric with confidence.”

The timing is notable for smaller operators. Fleets remain the engine of EV demand even as some big names, Uber among them, row back on all-electric targets, citing costs and patchy incentives. With the Workplace Charging Scheme now in its final confirmed year and grant money still on the table, SMEs weighing up the practicalities of workplace EV charging may find the admin side of electrification is finally catching up with the ambition.


Amy Ingham

Amy Ingham

Amy Ingham is a reporter at Business Matters, covering UK business news with a focus on breaking news, business policy, late payments and insolvency. She joined the magazine in 2026 after completing the NCTJ Diploma in Journalism at Harlow College’s journalism school. Her recent reporting includes British Steel’s nationalisation and its impact on SME suppliers, the decline in late payments by large firms, and Insolvency Service director disqualifications. Reach her at aingham@cbmeg.co.uk.

Advertisement

Continue Reading

Business

Mike Ashley’s Frasers Group raises Hugo Boss stake to 30% in takeover bid

Published

on

Business Live

The fashion group, which owns Sports Direct and Flannels, has bought 2.5m new shares in Hugo Boss, taking its total stake up to 30.28 per cent and crossing the mandatory bid threshold under German takeover rules

Hugo Boss store

Frasers is bidding for Hugo Boss (Image: GETTY)

Frasers Group has increased its stake in Hugo Boss beyond the threshold that compels it to make an offer for the entire business, intensifying pressure on the German fashion house to accept its £1.7bn proposal.

The fashion retailer, which owns Sports Direct and Flannels, announced on Tuesday that it had acquired 2.5m additional shares in Hugo Boss, lifting its total holding to 30.28 per cent. Under German takeover regulations, a shareholder must launch a bid for the whole company once their stake reaches the 30 per cent threshold.

Advertisement

Frasers said it was “pleased to confirm that it has exceeded the mandatory bid threshold,” adding that its existing bid “remains open for shareholders to accept”, City AM reported. The group, established by billionaire Mike Ashley, put forward a €38 per share offer for Hugo Boss last month, placing a value of nearly €2bn on the fashion brand.

However, Hugo Boss has urged its investors to reject this “inadequate bid”. The offer is set to expire on Monday 27 July. FTSE 250-listed Frasers Group already held approximately 26 per cent of Hugo Boss when it launched its bid last month.

The €38-per-share proposal raised questions amongst analysts as it represented merely a four per cent premium on Hugo Boss’ share price at the time of the offer. Shares in the German fashion house have subsequently risen above €38, having jumped more than nine per cent on the day Frasers submitted its offer.

Earlier this month, members of Hugo Boss’s management and supervisory board declared they “unanimously recommend that shareholders do not accept” the offer. Following a “comprehensive and independent review process”, the German fashion house concluded that the proposal would be “inadequate from a financial point of view”.

Advertisement

The company said it sought advice from bankers at the Bank of America and Goldman Sachs before determining that the offer price failed to reflect either the “standalone value” of Hugo Boss “nor its medium to long-term value creation potential”.

Last week, Frasers disclosed that its string of takeover bids — which included a hostile approach for Australian footwear retailer Accent — is driving its recovery. The group’s stakes in Hugo Boss and Accent contributed £50m to adjusted profit over the past year, it confirmed.

The FTSE 250 company recorded an eight per cent rise in revenue to £5.3bn for the year ending April, while pre-tax profit surged by more than a third to £528m.

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

At Close of Business podcast July 21 2026

Published

on

At Close of Business podcast July 21 2026

Ella Loneragan and Claire Tyrrell discuss the revamp of multiple heritage properties in Fremantle.

Continue Reading

Business

VAT to be cut from electricity bills in October

Published

on

Beatles star Sir Paul McCartney smiles and waves from a car window while holding up a smartphone. Ringo Starr can be seen on the screen, wearing sunglasses. McCartney is dressed in a beige jumper with a light blue shirt collar underneath and several bracelets on his wrist.

Jones, who was also previously chief secretary to the Treasury, wrote on X that the Digital ID programme was unfunded.

While praising the VAT cut as “good”, he said “the government will have to set out how it will pay for its new policies at the budget”.

Shadow Chancellor Mel Stride also criticised the use of the Digital ID budget to fund the VAT cut.

“The cuts to the Digital ID card budget are not real because the money was never provided in the first place.

Advertisement

“We are only one day in and already its smoke and mirrors on the public finances.”

Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds told BBC Breakfast: “We’re not saying it’s everything but it will give people breathing space.”

He said the announcement was “a statement of priorities from the new administration”.

Household energy prices rose by 13% for millions of people in England, Scotland and Wales at the start of July, under regulator Ofgem’s price cap.

Advertisement

Price rises were driven by the higher cost of gas, but have a relatively limited impact owing to warm weather and lower energy use during the summer months.

However, higher energy prices caused by the US-Israeli war with Iran, which has constrained global supplies of oil and liquified natural gas, are likely to persist into the winter, according to analysts.

The VAT cut only applies to the current financial year — any decision to keep it in future years would have to be made in a Budget.

The government expects it will lower inflation by 0.1 percentage points.

Advertisement

In his first speech as the UK’s prime minister, Burnham vowed to provide “breathing space” for households struggling with the cost of living.

On Tuesday, he said the VAT cut would “put more money in people’s pockets”.

The VAT cut is the second intervention on energy bills by the government in six months.

Former chancellor Rachel Reeves removed one levy and shifted others onto general taxation to lower bills in April.

Advertisement

Burnham’s new cabinet is due to meet for the first time at lunchtime on Tuesday.

The End Fuel Poverty Coalition welcomed the reduction, but said it “does not address the scale of what households are facing”.

Simon Francis, the group’s co-ordinator, said Burnham’s government must “go even further” with targeted support for those most in need.

He added: “This breathing space is also not a cure. The only way to bring bills down for good is to change how they are set.”

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025