Motorola’s next device appears determined to bring audio hardware for the rest of the room to watch along. It recently unveiled a powerful new Edge phone, and now, the Moto Pad 70 Groove will launch on July 31 with a nine-unit JBL speaker system capable of delivering up to 48 watts of output. The company has confirmed that the audio-focused tablet will pair those speakers with a 12.1-inch display and a sizable battery designed for long streaming sessions. But we still have no official word on its pricing and global availability.

Nine speakers give this tablet a unique purpose

The unusual sound system contains four tweeters, three woofers, and two passive radiators. JBL handled the audio tuning, while Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res Audio complete the package. It also supports 7.2-channel surround sound, which makes it a solid entertainment machine.

A rotating ring on the rear doubles as a stand, allowing the tablet to sit in portrait or landscape orientation. Motorola has also placed dedicated volume controls on the back, and the device can operate as a Bluetooth speaker for music playing from a phone. Those additions could make the Pad 70 Groove particularly useful around the house. It could sit on a kitchen counter for recipes and podcasts, handle films without immediately demanding headphones, or provide music without requiring a separate portable speaker.

The rest of it isn’t bad either

Motorola has confirmed a 12.1-inch “2.5K” panel with a 120Hz refresh rate. It reaches up to 800 nits in High Brightness Mode and supports HDR10 and Dolby Vision, making the device sound purpose-built for video rather than another generic Android slate with louder branding.

A 10,200mAh battery sits inside, with Motorola claiming up to 15 hours of video playback. The company will include a 68W charger. Going by its name, it is also a part of the Pad 70 series, and we did cover the Pad 70 Pro in the past. Performance and price will ultimately decide whether this is a good tablet. But the bigger doubt is if it will be released outside of India.

A new rumor claims that Apple is considering using what it will call a 7-inch screen for one of the 20th anniversary iPhones, although that isn’t as great an increase as it sounds.

One recent rumor claimed that Apple had begun production evaluation for a 2027 iPhone with a display that is curved on all four sides. Then another claimed that the iPhone 20 range would feature a significant redesign.

For the first time, though, a leaker is claiming that Apple is testing what would be its largest iPhone screen. According to Digital Chat Station on Chinese social media site Weibo, if it goes ahead with this screen, Apple will market it as being a 7-inch one.

The claim says, though, that it would actually be 6.96 inches. That’s close enough for Apple’s marketing, but it seems less significant since the current iPhone 17 Pro Max screen is 6.86 inches.

Still, screen sizes are measured diagonally so such a difference could amount to the iPhone 20 Pro Max screen being up to 2% larger than the current model. That’s enough to be noticeable in the hand, although there’s no indication yet whether the pixel density will remain the same.

The last time Apple increased the screen size of its iPhones was in 2024. Then the iPhone 16 Pro Max went up from 6.7 inches to 6.9 inches, while the iPhone 16 Pro screen was 6.3 inches where its predecessor had a 6.1 inch display.

Digital Chat Station says that the new, larger screen size has not been decided on. This leaker has a reasonable track record with Apple leaks, and has recently reported rumors about the screen size of the iPhone Fold 2.

Presented by JumpCloud

The organizations losing confidence in AI are the ones most likely to get it right.

Six months ago, 40% of IT leaders described their organizations as mature in AI deployment. Today that number is 23%. Before you read that as a setback, consider what it actually reflects.

We recently surveyed 800 IT leaders across the U.S. and U.K. for our Q3 2026 trends report, and the data tells a consistent story: the organizations revising their self-assessment downward are overwhelmingly the ones that have moved AI agents from pilots into production. They’re not losing faith in AI. They’re running into the problems that only show up when agents are doing real work in real systems, and they’re being honest about what they found.

That kind of honesty is harder to come by than it sounds, and it matters more than the confidence number itself.

Deployment was the easy part

84% of organizations plan to expand AI use in IT operations over the next 6 to 24 months, so the drop in confidence isn’t a retreat. What it reflects is a more accurate picture of what production actually requires.

In a pilot, an AI agent does one thing in a controlled setting. In production, it accesses real systems, makes decisions that affect real workflows, and operates continuously, often without a human in the loop. The governance infrastructure that entails is materially different from what it took to get the pilot working. Most organizations built enough to ship. Fewer built enough to scale.

The IT leaders revising their self-assessment are confronting questions they didn’t have to ask at the pilot stage: Can we see every agent running in our environment? Do we know what each one can access? If an agent behaved unexpectedly last week, how long would it take to find out? For most organizations, at least one of those answers is uncomfortable.

The gap between perception and reality is where risk accumulates

The graphic above captures the structural problem. Across confidence, governance, and autonomy, the same pattern holds: deployment is moving faster than the controls built around it.

The organizations that have closed this gap share specific characteristics. They’ve consolidated their IT environments rather than adding tools to solve each new problem, because every additional platform creates another place where agent identity, access, and accountability can go unmanaged. They treat AI agents as governed identities rather than tolerated shadow processes. And they measure what AI actually produces, not just what it deploys.

The payoff is tangible. Organizations in the top tier of our maturity model are five times more likely to report no barriers to expanding their AI agents than the average organization. They are not more cautious about AI. They are more confident in it, because they built the foundation that makes confidence earned rather than assumed.

The governance gap has a specific shape

The hardest problem in enterprise AI right now is not capability. It is accountability, and the data makes the specific failure point clear: non-human identity governance is the least adopted AI security practice we measured, in place at just 21% of organizations.

Non-human identities now outnumber human users in 83% of organizations, and that population is growing fast. Yet most of those identities exist without the governance structures that every human employee has as a matter of course: no formal record, no named owner, no defined scope of access, no offboarding process when their purpose expires. They keep running. They keep accessing systems. They keep accumulating permissions. We call these Zombie Agents, and they are the service account problem of the AI era, operating at machine speed and in every department.

The accountability gap is where real risk lives. When a human employee takes an action, there is an implicit accountability chain. When an autonomous agent takes an action, that chain breaks unless it has been deliberately engineered. Most organizations have not yet engineered it, and the gap between the autonomy agents are being granted and the oversight structures in place to manage them is widening every month.

What the confidence drop is actually telling us

When AI maturity confidence was uniformly high across the market, that was worth worrying about. It meant most organizations hadn’t yet run into the hard parts. A selective drop, concentrated among organizations actively running agents in production, means the market is developing a more accurate picture of what AI operations genuinely require.

The organizations recalibrating are doing the work that makes long-term AI adoption possible: building identity infrastructure that covers agents alongside humans and devices, unifying the environments where governance needs to apply, and measuring outcomes rather than just counting deployments. They haven’t lowered their ambitions for AI. They have raised their standards for what it means to run it responsibly.

84% of organizations plan to expand AI use over the next two years. The ones that will do it well are honest enough, right now, to admit what they haven’t yet built.

JumpCloud’s Q3 2026 AI Readiness Research report (n=800 IT leaders, U.S. + U.K.) is available here. The report covers AI agent deployment stages, identity governance gaps, IT unification benchmarks, and budget realism across mid-market and enterprise organizations.

Rajat Bhargava is CEO and Co-founder at JumpCloud.

Sponsored articles are content produced by a company that is either paying for the post or has a business relationship with VentureBeat, and they’re always clearly marked. For more information, contact sales@venturebeat.com.

Assassin’s Creed Shadows only launched last year, and Switch 2 owners can already pick it up at almost half its original price.

That reduction comes from a limited time deal that cuts Assassin’s Creed Shadows on Switch 2 from its usual £49.99 down to £25.99, a 48% saving that brings one of the franchise’s best reviewed games within easy reach.