Crypto World
Balaji Network School Expands to Kazakhstan After Malaysia Setback
Balaji Srinivasan’s Network School is looking to plant a new campus in Kazakhstan after regulatory pressure in Malaysia forced its Johor operation to halt. The move comes via a memorandum of understanding (MoU) between Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Digital Development, Innovation and Aerospace Industry and Srinivasan, signaling a rapid attempt to preserve the project’s cross-border footprint.
The Kazakhstan agreement positions Network School for a fresh base following actions that disrupted its local operations in Johor. Kazakhstan has been actively courting technology and digital-industry activity, including plans for a Central Asia “crypto city” in Alatau—an environment that Network School appears eager to tap.
Key takeaways
- Network School signed an MoU in Kazakhstan, potentially creating its first local campus there.
- Malaysia’s Johor authorities revoked the business license of NSO Malaysia Sdn Bhd, the operator behind Network School’s Forest City-linked presence.
- Malaysia Digital status is under immediate review, since the operator’s Malaysia Digital recognition is tied to compliance with local and federal laws.
- Srinivasan says the Kazakhstan campus will focus on talent attraction, including expedited visas and streamlined redomiciliation.
Kazakhstan MoU offers a fallback for Network School’s expansion
According to a ministry statement, Kazakhstan’s Ministry of Digital Development, Innovation and Aerospace Industry signed an MoU with Balaji Srinivasan to establish the first Network School campus in the country. The memorandum was signed by Zhaslan Madiyev on behalf of the ministry and Srinivasan on the Network School side.
For the project, the timing matters. Network School’s Kazakhstan plan appears framed as continuity after setbacks in Malaysia. The article also notes that Kazakhstan has been positioning itself as an emerging technology hub, and references ambitions such as a Central Asia “crypto city” in Alatau—suggesting regulators and policymakers there may be more receptive to experiments that sit near the boundary between technology policy and digital-asset culture.
Srinivasan described the new campus as a place designed to accelerate onboarding for participants. In a post dated Tuesday on X, he said the campus would offer a “haven for global techno-optimism,” including expedited visas, streamlined redomiciliation, and active recruitment of talent.
Malaysia regulatory action escalates: license revocation and Malaysia Digital review
Network School’s Kazakhstan pivot follows multiple regulatory developments in Malaysia. On Tuesday, the Iskandar Puteri City Council (MBIP) revoked the business license of NSO Malaysia Sdn Bhd, which operates Network School. The revocation was linked to alleged breaches of licensing conditions and premises-use requirements.
The Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation (MDEC), which oversees the “Malaysia Digital” program, then announced immediate steps to revoke the operator’s Malaysia Digital status. Malaysia Digital recognition is granted to eligible technology and digital companies and, as described in the source coverage, can come with incentives such as tax benefits, flexibility around ownership, and the ability to employ local and foreign workers.
Crucially, the program also requires licensees to comply with local and federal laws. With NSO Malaysia’s license revoked, MDEC’s move indicates the regulator is treating the Malaysia Digital designation as contingent on continued lawful operations.
Johor politics and immigration scrutiny widen the dispute
Beyond the licensing issue, the dispute has also pulled in higher-level political attention. The source reports that Onn Hafiz Ghazi, Chief Minister of Johor, urged Malaysia’s federal authorities to continue investigating whether Network School violated immigration laws. He framed Johor as a “strategic entry point” due to the state’s proximity to Singapore, arguing that any weaknesses or misuse of the immigration system should be addressed promptly and firmly.
This matters for Network School because its model—bringing in global “digital nomads” and hosting a dense community of talent—depends on predictable pathways for visas, residency changes, and compliance. When immigration questions enter the picture, the risk is not only reputational; it can directly affect members’ ability to travel, work, or remain in the country.
The source also indicates that Srinivasan pushed back on reports that Network School was shutting down. On Friday, he denied the closures, saying the project had received two notices: one requiring a sign’s wording to be changed, and another related to a coworking setup created by joining two adjacent units. He said one side of that arrangement had a valid license while the other did not, and claimed the group had a remedial period to address both issues.
According to Srinivasan, members were otherwise unaffected during that remedial window. Cointelegraph reported that it reached out to Srinivasan and Network School for comment, but the article’s account focuses primarily on the regulatory steps already taken by the local council and MDEC.
What changes—and what remains uncertain—if Network School relocates
The Kazakhstan MoU suggests Network School wants to avoid a prolonged pause by securing an alternative operating base quickly. But an agreement is not the same as full operational clearance. Readers should view the MoU as a framework for collaboration and campus establishment, while awaiting more detailed information on licensing, immigration logistics, and the practical timeline for opening.
Still, the contrast between Malaysia and Kazakhstan is instructive. In Malaysia, the dispute moved from licensing conditions to a broader discussion involving Malaysia Digital compliance and immigration law scrutiny. In Kazakhstan, the present reporting centers on cooperation and talent-attraction features—expedited visas and streamlined redomiciliation—language that typically signals a focus on easing administrative friction.
For investors, builders, and community operators watching the “network state” concept, the underlying takeaway may be how regulatory pressure in one jurisdiction can accelerate relocation tactics. A community anchored in one place can gain momentum, but it is also exposed: local licensing, premises rules, and immigration enforcement can rapidly reshape operating reality. Network School’s next steps in Kazakhstan will therefore function as a real-world test of whether the administrative environment for techno-nomad hubs can be replicated across borders.
As the Kazakhstan campus planning progresses, the most important thing to watch is how the MoU translates into concrete permits and member onboarding on the ground—particularly on visas and local compliance. Until then, Network School’s situation remains a moving target shaped by how regulators interpret licensing, premises usage, and immigration obligations in each country.
Movement Labs, the team behind the Movement Ethereum layer-2 blockchain, has filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, according to court records. The filing, made July 15, uses Subchapter V—an expedited reorganization track intended for qualifying small businesses—while the company restructures under court supervision.
The court has already approved interim requests that allow Movement Labs to keep operating through the process. Those approvals include maintaining bank accounts and cash management systems, along with access to debtor-in-possession (DIP) financing to fund continued operations. Creditors have until Sept. 14 to submit claims.
Key takeaways
- Movement Labs filed for Chapter 11 under Subchapter V, enabling continued operations while it restructures.
- Interim court approvals cover cash handling and DIP financing to support day-to-day operations during bankruptcy.
- The petition applies to Movement Labs only, according to Move Industries CEO Torab Torabi.
- Multiple earlier setbacks tied to MOVE token trading and market-making concerns preceded the bankruptcy filing.
Court-supervised reorganization begins under Subchapter V
In its Chapter 11 filing, Movement Labs sought protection as it reorganizes following a period of disruption for the Movement ecosystem. The petition was filed July 15 in the District of Delaware and placed the company under court oversight, with Subchapter V designed to streamline the path to reorganization for eligible businesses.
Per the court approvals reported in the filing process, Movement Labs was allowed to continue using its banking and cash management arrangements. The court also authorized debtor-in-possession financing—an important step in Chapter 11 cases because it can help preserve operational continuity while liabilities are addressed.
The timeline for creditors is set at Sept. 14 to file claims, giving holders of potential debts a defined window to participate in the bankruptcy process.
What “Chapter 11” means for the ecosystem
After the bankruptcy filing became public, Move Industries CEO Torab Torabi clarified that the court protection applies only to Movement Labs. Torabi wrote on X that Move Industries—described as having taken over development and operations of the Movement ecosystem—continues to operate normally.
Earlier coverage and Movement’s own communications indicate that Move Industries assumed responsibility for development and operations from Movement Labs in December 2025, through a transfer described in a post on the Movement Network website: Movement Network Foundation and Move Industries announce completion of.
That distinction matters for readers trying to separate the corporate entity in bankruptcy from the broader project. While Chapter 11 may affect contracts, liabilities, and certain company-held assets, it does not automatically mean all ecosystem activity halts—especially where another operator is already handling development and operations.
A market-making controversy and listing actions preceded the filing
Movement Labs’ bankruptcy comes after months of controversy connected to the launch of Movement’s MOVE token and a market-making agreement that drew scrutiny.
According to earlier reporting from Cointelegraph, Movement Labs suspended co-founder Rushi Manche in May 2025 over a deal he helped broker with Web3Port. The market maker reportedly received 66 million MOVE—about 5% of the token’s supply—and later sold the holdings. Cointelegraph noted this was followed by an independent investigation, with the reported sales creating downward pressure on the token’s price.
Cointelegraph also reported that Coinbase suspended trading for MOVE later in May 2025 after determining the token no longer met its listing standards, while review into the market-making arrangement was ongoing.
In the period since those events, the MOVE token faced prolonged weakness. Cointelegraph cited a continued decline, stating the token has fallen more than 94% over the past year to roughly $0.01. The article referenced CoinGecko for the one-year price chart: CoinGecko.
Investors and users: what to watch next
Chapter 11 filings often signal the beginning of a longer restructuring process, and this one is likely to add a layer of legal complexity to questions around Movement Labs’ obligations and any assets under its control. Even if Move Industries continues operating, the bankruptcy proceedings can still influence how related contracts are handled and how remaining stakeholders are treated.
With creditors now having until Sept. 14 to file claims, the next steps worth monitoring are the bankruptcy court’s ongoing approvals, the scope of DIP financing over time, and whether subsequent filings clarify what parties will be prioritized during restructuring.
President Donald Trump called on the Senate to pass the Clarity Act "in honor of Senator Lindsey Graham, a big supporter" of the crypto market structure bill, in a Truth Social post Monday. Graham, the South Carolina Republican and Senate Banking Committee chair, died unexpectedly on July 11. Trump… Read the full story at The Defiant
Strategy sold $466.7 million worth of MSTR common stock between July 6 and July 12, 2026, lifting its USD reserve to $3 billion while leaving its bitcoin holdings unchanged at 843,775 BTC, according to a Form 8-K the company filed with the SEC on July 13. The company sold roughly 4.82 million… Read the full story at The Defiant
S&P Dow Jones Indices and Pantera Capital have launched the S&P Pantera Digital Asset Index, a new benchmark that selects digital assets using revenue, market size and liquidity measures.
Summary
- S&P and Pantera launched an 18-token index focused on revenue-generating digital assets for institutional investors.
- ETH, BNB, SOL, TRX and HYPE rank as the index’s five largest confirmed current holdings.
- The benchmark screens tokens by revenue, liquidity and market size before applying capped market-cap weightings.
The firms announced the product on July 21, while S&P index materials list July 20 as its official launch date. The index currently holds 18 digital assets and targets institutional investors seeking a structured way to track a broader part of the crypto market, according to the official announcement.
The five largest constituents are Ether (ETH), BNB, Solana (SOL), TRON (TRX) and Hyperliquid (HYPE), according to S&P Dow Jones Indices. The selection gives the benchmark a different profile from crypto products that concentrate heavily on Bitcoin or rank assets mainly by market capitalization. S&P says the index focuses on protocols that show recurring economic activity through protocol-level revenue.
Revenue rules shape the S&P Pantera Digital Asset Index
The index starts with assets from the S&P Cryptocurrency Broad Digital Asset Index and then applies several eligibility tests. New constituents must have a market capitalization above $500 million and meet a liquidity ratio above 0.5. Existing constituents receive a lower $250 million market-cap threshold. The screening process then narrows the eligible universe to assets that meet the benchmark’s economic activity requirements.
After the initial screening, the index ranks eligible assets by revenue generated over the previous two quarters. It adds assets until the selected group represents 99% of the eligible universe’s total revenue. S&P uses data from Artemis to measure protocol-level revenue. The index then weights constituents by adjusted market capitalization, while limiting the largest holding to 35% and every other holding to 20% at each rebalance.
Cathy Clay, CEO of S&P Dow Jones Indices, said the company built the benchmark around “using a fundamentals-driven, economics-based framework built for diversified portfolios.” The structure allows the index to serve as a benchmark for active strategies and as a possible base for future index-linked investment products. S&P also states that protocol revenue acts as a rules-based measure of economic activity rather than a forecast of future investor returns.
ETH, BNB and SOL lead the 18-token basket
The current top holdings show how the revenue screen changes the composition of a broad crypto benchmark. Ether sits among the largest constituents alongside BNB and SOL, while TRX and HYPE complete the top five. The basket therefore includes smart-contract platforms and trading infrastructure that generate measurable activity across their networks.
The approach also places less weight on token popularity alone. Dan Morehead, Pantera Capital’s founder and managing partner, said “the biggest friction point in crypto hasn’t changed; it’s knowing how to allocate.” Pantera contributed digital-asset research and governance experience to the project, while S&P supplied its index design and administration framework.
The launch follows other moves by S&P Dow Jones Indices to expand its digital-asset products. As previously reported by crypto.news, S&P announced plans for the S&P Digital Markets 50 Index in 2025, combining 15 cryptocurrencies with 35 crypto-linked public companies. That product takes a wider ecosystem approach, while the new Pantera index narrows its selection around recurring protocol revenue and economic activity.
Institutional crypto benchmarks continue to expand
Other financial market operators have also introduced basket-based crypto products for professional investors. As crypto.news reported in June, CME Group launched Nasdaq CME Crypto Index futures tied to eight major digital assets. The cash-settled contract gives investors a regulated way to gain or hedge exposure to several cryptocurrencies without holding each underlying token directly.
Meanwhile, S&P has continued work that connects established benchmarks with blockchain infrastructure. As crypto.news reported in April, S&P Dow Jones Indices and Kaiko announced plans to bring the iBoxx U.S. Treasury index onto the Canton Network. The project aims to support index-linked products through on-chain index data, licensing terms and access controls.
The S&P Pantera Digital Asset Index adds another model to this growing set of benchmark products. Rather than building the basket around market capitalization alone, it uses revenue and liquidity screens before assigning capped market-cap weights. Its 18-token composition and current top holdings place ETH, BNB, SOL, TRX and HYPE at the center of the benchmark at launch.
S&P says the index can act as a reference point for active managers and potential index-linked products. However, investors cannot invest directly in an index, and third parties would separately issue any investment products based on the benchmark. The index’s composition can also change at future rebalances as assets meet or fall outside its selection rules.
Kalshi spent $990,000 on federal lobbying in the first half of 2026, nearly matching its total for all of last year, as it races to counter the casino industry on Capitol Hill.
The prediction market operator and its gambling-sector rivals are both sharply raising spending. Kalshi’s direct lobbying alone nearly matches the American Gaming Association’s, signaling how hard each side is working to win over lawmakers.
The Prediction Market vs Gambling Lobbying Fight
Kalshi’s $990,000 closes in on the $1 million it spent across all of 2025. Including outside firms, its total nears $1.8 million, a record six-month figure disclosed in federal filings this week.
The company deploys seven lobbying firms, including its in-house team. It has hired former Biden and Obama administration officials to widen its reach. Kalshi also counts Donald Trump Jr. as a paid advisor.
Polymarket keeps a lighter presence. A single firm spent $180,000 on its behalf, pacing toward the $360,000 spent last year.
The gambling side is spending more, too. The American Gaming Association has committed $1.39 million in 2026, up 30% from the same period last year. The Cherokee Nation, which holds gaming interests, has spent $600,000.
Patrick McHenry, a former Republican congressman who now advises the Coalition for Prediction Markets, said the casino lobby has a structural head start.
“So much of the existing infrastructure of engagement on the Hill and at the states has been by the casino industry. The prediction markets are a new entrant into the policy debate in Washington, and are making great strides at communicating with lawmakers,” he said.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Why the Two Sides Are Clashing
At the center of the tension is the rise of prediction markets and their growing pull on retail users. As these venues gain popularity, they are drawing bettors away from traditional sportsbooks.
That shift explains the gambling sector’s resistance. Operators view sports-event contracts as direct competition that bypasses state and tribal gaming rules.
The tension escalated in June, when the gambling industry pressed the Senate to ban sports contracts in the crypto market structure bill.
Prediction markets have also faced concerns about insider trading. Recent incidents highlight the scale of the problem.
That activity has renewed scrutiny from lawmakers, many of whom have introduced bills to curb the practice. The platforms themselves have moved to counter the growing concern.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post Prediction Markets and Casinos Are Both Betting Big on Washington appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Coinbase Chief Executive Brian Armstrong said Base's yearlong push into creator "content coins" failed, telling a critic on X Monday that the Coinbase-incubated network "pivoted early this year" away from the strategy. "They didn't work and we pivoted early this year. We messed up, time to turn the… Read the full story at The Defiant
Tesla (TSLA) reports second-quarter earnings today after US markets close. Investors already know how many cars it sold, so the real test is profit.
Wall Street expects a sharp jump in earnings per share from last quarter. Most of Tesla’s good news already came out weeks ago, though.
What Wall Street Expects
Analyst estimates cluster between $0.50 and $0.55 per share. That marks a solid jump from the $0.41 Tesla earned in the first quarter.
Revenue forecasts range from about $25.7 billion to $27.6 billion. That is up from $22.39 billion in the prior quarter.
Tesla’s earnings record has been uneven, though, it has missed some estimates in six of its last 10 quarters, according to Zacks Investment Research. Still, it beat those estimates by double digits over the last two quarters, with an average surprise of 5.48% over the last four.
Why the Delivery Numbers Won’t Move Much
Tesla already told investors it delivered 480,126 vehicles in the second quarter. That is a 25% jump from a year earlier and well above the roughly 406,000 vehicles analysts expected.
Energy storage deployments rose more than 40% from last year too. Because these figures came out weeks ago, much of that good news likely already sits in Tesla’s share price.
What Could Actually Swing the Stock
The number investors will watch closest is Tesla’s automotive profit margin, excluding regulatory credits. Tesla earns these credits by beating emissions rules, then sells them to automakers that fall short.
Estimates point to a possible dip to around 18.1%, down from 19.2% in the first quarter. Discounts and cheap financing offers could explain the drop.
Investors will also listen for updates on three things: Tesla’s Cybercab robotaxi rollout, its Full Self-Driving software, and AI infrastructure spending. Analysts frame the stakes directly.
Tesla’s stronger automotive performance should improve near-term earnings and help finance its artificial intelligence investments, but Robotaxi, Full Self-Driving and Optimus remain the main drivers of the stock’s valuation, this according to analysts at Morgan Stanley and Barclays.
Tesla’s first-quarter earnings beat came alongside a $2 billion investment in Elon Musk’s SpaceX, a company that has seen a sharp share price slide of its own this year. The report also lands in the middle of a broader corporate earnings season, following strong results from major banks earlier this month.
The Bottom Line
Options markets are pricing a swing of roughly 6% to 8% in either direction once Tesla reports. A margin beat paired with a firm robotaxi timeline could support the stock. A vague update on autonomy, even with strong headline numbers, may not be enough to change the story.
The post Tesla Earnings Today: What to Expect as Investors Eye Profit Margins Over Deliveries appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Hut 8 Corp. (HUT) shares have swung between $44 and $133 in 2026, a peak-to-trough gain of about 200%, according to TradingView data.
The stock now trades near $108, up about 128% for the year, after Hut 8 signed a $9.8 billion, 15-year lease with an unnamed technology hyperscaler.
The AI Pivot
Speaking to CNBC, CEO Asher Genoot said the was proof that Hut 8’s pivot from Bitcoin mining to artificial intelligence (AI) infrastructure is paying off for shareholders.
The new lease adds 704 megawatts of capacity to Beacon Point, Hut 8’s AI data center campus in Texas, and carries an implied $653 million in annual revenue. Genoot said Hut 8 had zero contracted AI revenue about a year ago.
He now counts roughly $27 billion in contracted AI revenue and about $1.75 billion in annualized earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (EBITDA).
What Happened to the Bitcoin Mining Business
Hut 8 was firstly known as a Bitcoin mining business, but the company technically no longer runs Bitcoin mining directly. In March 2025, it moved the business into American Bitcoin Corp. (ABTC), a separately traded subsidiary that Hut 8 majority owns and that Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. partly back.
Unlike Hut 8’s own AI pivot, ABTC has doubled down on mining, expanding its fleet capacity and its Bitcoin (BTC) reserve through 2026.
That bet has not paid off for ABTC’s backers. Its shares have fallen more than 76% in 2026, a drop that wiped out over $600 million from Eric Trump’s stake, echoing the pattern in American Bitcoin’s stock crash.
The AI Story, and the Pushback
Despite the successful pivot, Hut 8 has been under the microscope for its contribution to electricity prices. Genoot rejected a New York Times report that blamed data centers for $6.3 billion in added electricity bills across PJM Interconnection, the grid operator covering 13 states and Washington, D.C.
The report tied the increase to a capacity auction PJM held on June 30. “It’s not true,” Genoot said on air. He argued that most data center developers, including Hut 8, cover their own transmission upgrades and energy costs instead of passing them to ratepayers.
Independent analysts complicate that upbeat picture. A Seeking Alpha review of Hut 8’s first-quarter 2026 results found a $253 million net loss and negative margins in its digital infrastructure segment. The same analysis does not expect material AI revenue until the second quarter of 2027.
Hut 8’s stock chart and ABTC’s chart tell two very different stories right now. Whether Hut 8’s $27 billion in contracted AI revenue turns into real cash before ABTC’s mining bet recovers could decide which story wins out.
The post Hut 8 Stock Surges Up to 200% in 2026 as Bitcoin Mining Unit Struggles appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Blockchain security firms linked the collapse to a suspected attack on 42DAO, the decentralized organization that governs the Balance Protocol ecosystem.
The war against Iran has run up a heavy bill for the United States, now pegged at $37.5 billion.
The estimate, delivered by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, arrives as US strikes on Iran continue for an 11th straight night.
US Defence Secretary Puts Iran War Cost at $37.5 Billion
Hegseth presented the figure to the Senate Appropriations Committee on Tuesday. He said the $37.5 billion covered certain aspects of the war plus anticipated costs through September 30.
Cost estimates have risen sharply since the conflict. Reuters reported in March that the administration valued the first six days of fighting at a minimum of $11.3 billion.
The latest $37.5 billion figure sits roughly $12 billion above the $25 billion estimate Hegseth gave in late April. He offered that number just before Trump brokered a temporary ceasefire with Iran.
The administration is also pressing for more money. In late June, it asked Congress for $87.6 billion in extra funding.
The New York Times reported that as much as $70 billion of that would go to emergency military spending. The funds would cover war costs and pay for new weapons and personnel.
The Pentagon wants $46 billion to expand munitions production. That includes precision bombs, hypersonic missiles, and counter-drone systems.
“This is a new request based on new realities of a world we face, stepping up to meet that moment,” Hegseth stated.
Ordinary Americans are absorbing costs too. Brown University’s Watson Institute estimates that higher gasoline and diesel prices have added $71.8 billion in consumer spending since the war began. That works out to about $548 per US household.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
US-Iran Ceasefire Proposal Lands as Strikes Hit 11th Night
Diplomacy has run in parallel with the fighting. A senior Iranian official told Reuters on Monday that mediators had handed Tehran a de-escalation proposal.
The plan floats a 10-day ceasefire. The pause would create room to revive an interim deal struck last month.
Those talks have not slowed the strikes. CENTCOM said it finished its 11th consecutive night of operations against Iran on Tuesday evening.
According to CENTCOM, the strikes hit military command centers, aircraft hangars, drone storage sites, and naval assets. The stated goal is to blunt threats to shipping in the Strait of Hormuz.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post How Much Has the Iran War Cost the US? Defence Secretary Puts a Number on It appeared first on BeInCrypto.
PGA and DP Tours strike new partnership in another blow to LIV Golf
Leaving Apple, Intel, and Nvidia in the dust? Huawei could join Samsung as the only tech firms producing its own CPUs, SSDs, and DRAM
Jade Thirlwall ‘SPLITS from boyfriend Jordan Stephens after six years as they wipe each other from Instagram’
-
NewsBeat6 days agoLondon Mayor Sadiq Khan handed a peerage by Keir Starmer alongside 15 other Labour figures… just days before the PM leaves No10
-
Fashion4 days agoWeekend Open Thread – Corporette.com
-
Politics4 days agoThe House | The City of London can help the new chancellor deliver growth in every postcode
-
Politics7 days agoYoung campaigners urge incoming PM to act on outdoor junk food ads
-
Crypto World5 days agoTwo July Windows Left: The CLARITY Act’s Senate Fight and What Failure Means
-
Crypto World6 days agoCFTC blocks Kalshi from unwinding Michigan trades after court order
-
Crypto World4 days agoRipple Payments Joins MiCA With 14 Firms, Does It Mean Anything For XRP?
-
Business6 days agoNvidia Stock Slips After Big Tuesday Rally as Huang Confirms Vera Rubin Chip Is Now in Production Today
-
Politics3 days agoDemocrats look to World Cup watch parties to register thousands of voters
-
Entertainment6 days agoDisney’s Most Ambitious Failed Star Wars Attraction Is Coming to SDCC
-
Crypto World4 days agoRipple wins EU-wide access as ESMA adds it to MiCA register
-
Crypto World20 hours agoGrayscale Files For Worldcoin ETF, WLD Registers Sharp Rise
-
Crypto World5 days agoInjective Submits SEC Transfer-Agent Registration to Onchain Ownership Records
-
Business6 days agoPalantir Shares Rise After Expanded Nvidia Partnership and Fresh Analyst Upgrades Ahead of Earnings Day
-
Tech1 day agoSail Virtually Aboard The “Itanic” With IA-64 Emulator
-
Tech1 day ago
Turtle Beach Command Series KB7 review: a nifty screen-equipped gaming keyboard
-
NewsBeat5 days agoRegistration is now open for March for Men with Kev 2026
-
NewsBeat2 days agoUnregistered fitter used Gas Safe logo on business flyers
-
Sports6 days agoNew Cornerback Enters Vikings Trade Rumor Mill
-
News Videos5 days agoMoney | Class 12 Economics | CBSE Board Exam 2026-27
You must be logged in to post a comment Login