Connect with us

Politics

Perth primary schools close as strikes target Swinney constituency

Published

on

Perth primary schools close as strikes target Swinney constituency

All of the primary schools in Perth and Kinross are closed after non-teaching school staff began strike action in First Minister John Swinney’s constituency.

Members of the union Unison, which includes janitors and classroom assistants, have walked out over pay for all council workers – meaning 50 schools and early years centres will be closed today and could remain closed for two weeks.

The union has targeted the first minister’s constituency with hopes of putting pressure on Mr Swinney.

The latest pay offer – an increase of either 3.6% or £1,292 – was made in August to see off the threat of bin strikes and it was accepted by GMB and Unite but not Unison, the biggest council union.

Advertisement

All secondary schools will be open except St John’s Academy in Perth and the Community School of Auchterarder.

The council said it was not possible to complete risk assessments in advance due to the October holidays, so it had to close all primary schools and early years centres – but the situation will be reviewed daily.

It said the situation could change on a day-to-day basis, and parents and guardians should refer to the council website for updates.

Before and after school care will also be closed and payments will be made to families whose children are eligible for free school meals.

Advertisement

The walkout by Unison members is due to begin immediately after the two-week October school holiday, meaning schools could be shut for a full month

Both the Scottish government and council body Cosla said no more money for pay deals was available this year.

The GMB and Unite wanted their members to get the 3.6% rise they voted for as soon as possible. This would be backdated to April.

However, Unison has warned of a national strike ballot if the dispute is not resolved.

Advertisement

The union believes more needs to be done to address what it sees as the long-term decline in the value of council pay.

It argued that council staff have seen the value of their pay fall by 25% over the last 14 years and said councils have faced problems recruiting staff for some roles.

Speaking to BBC Radio’s Good Morning Scotland programme, Finance Secretary Shona Robison said no one’s interests will be served by the industrial action.

She said: “I’m acutely aware of the impact on children and parents in Perth and Kinross

Advertisement

“I would certainly encourage dialogue to continue between Cosla and Unison, a solution has to be found.

She added: “I have to be clear, the result of this industrial action and all this disruption will not be more money, because there simply is none.”

Councils said using any more of their money for pay would mean further cuts to services or job losses.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Politics

Woman admits hurling McDonald’s milkshake over Nigel Farage

Published

on

Is Reform UK's plan to get Farage into No 10 mission impossible?
Getty Images A woman in a grey hoody is holding a paper cup in her outstretched hand. There is yellow milkshake coming out of it, flying through the air in the direction of Nigel Farage. He is wearing a dark suit with pink shirt and tie. Getty Images

Nigel Farage was walking to the Reform UK campaign bus during the general election campaign when a woman threw a milkshake in his face

A woman who threw a McDonald’s milkshake over Reform UK leader Nigel Farage during the general election campaign has pleaded guilty to assault by beating.

Farage was leaving a pub in Clacton-on-Sea on 4 June having launched his candidacy for the Essex constituency when a drink was hurled in his face.

Victoria Thomas Bowen, 25, of St Osyth Road in Clacton, had previously denied the charge, and will be sentenced at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in December.

Mr Farage, who won the seat in the 4 July vote, was campaigning at the Moon & Starfish pub on the seafront when the attack happened.

Advertisement
PA Media Nigel Farage (left) and Victoria Thomas Bowen (third from left) both walk towards Westminster Magistrates' Court. PA Media

Reform UK leader Nigel Farage has been at Westminster Magistrates’ Court

Thomas Bowen also admitted criminal damage after causing £17.50 worth of damage to a jacket belonging to Mr Farage’s security officer James Woolfenden.

She changed her pleas to both charges before the start of her scheduled trial.

Deputy senior district judge Tan Ikram adjourned sentencing until 16 December.

PA Media Victoria Thomas Bowen arriving at Westminster Magistrates' Court in London. She has long blonde hair, and is large black wearing sunglasses, a green sleeveless polo neck top and black skirt. She is carrying a light coloured coat. PA Media

Victoria Thomas Bowen arriving at Westminster Magistrates’ Court in London

The judge said : “This was an unprovoked, targeted attack, now on an elected Member of Parliament.

Advertisement

“I take a serious view of these offences.

“I am seeking a pre-sentence report which will consider all options for sentence.”

In a witness statement read out in court, Farage said “this incident caused me concern as I have only been going about my job” and that he tried to “have as much public engagement as possible”.

“I’m saddened that this has happened at a public campaign,” he added.

Advertisement

During a police interview Thomas Bowen said she saw a post online about Mr Farage’s attendance at the Wetherspoon outlet that day, the court heard.

She told officers she “does not agree with his political views” and decided to act because “she had the opportunity” when she saw him leaving the pub.

Giving details from her police interview, prosecutor Nishma Shah told the court: “She acknowledges that this was an assault and that the liquid would have gone over the jackets of him and others and caused them to get cleaning, but she states that Nigel would be able to afford this.

“She states she did not regret her actions.”

Advertisement

Thomas Bowen told police she did not intend the paper cup to hit Farage.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Former Tory minister David Gauke to lead prison sentencing review

Published

on

Former Tory minister David Gauke to lead prison sentencing review

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer will appoint the former Conservative Justice Secretary David Gauke to lead a review of prison sentencing, the BBC has confirmed.

The Labour Party said in its general election manifesto it would establish a review of sentencing “to ensure it is brought up to date”.

The BBC reported earlier this month that Gauke was the frontrunner to lead the review.

His appointment is expected to be announced on Tuesday by Justice Secretary Shabana Mahmood.

Advertisement

Gauke was justice secretary under Theresa May from January 2018 to July 2019.

He then broke with the Conservative Party over Brexit, and stood unsuccessfully as an independent candidate at the 2019 general election. In July he rejoined the Conservative Party.

Gauke has previously suggested that jail terms of less than six months should be scrapped.

The prisons minister, Lord Timpson, has also previously argued that the prison population is too large.

Advertisement

As well as scrapping short sentences, the review is expected to consider toughening up community orders as an alternative to jail.

Community orders can include compelling someone to take part in rehabilitation programmes or carry out unpaid work for the local area such as removing graffiti.

Someone given a community order may also face restrictions on where they live or where they can go.

Several government sources have pointed to advances in technology, such as sobriety tags monitoring alcohol use, that could be used more widely to detain criminals in their homes.

Advertisement

Ministers are also exploring international examples of reducing crime in Texas and Louisiana, where prisoners can reduce their sentences by earning credits for good behaviour.

The review is expected to make its recommendations in the spring.

Since coming to power in July the government has had to grapple with severe overcrowding in prisons in England and Wales.

One of Labour’s first acts after winning the election was to implement an early release scheme, drawn up by the previous government.

Advertisement

Under the scheme, prisoners can be let out if they have completed 40% of their sentence, rather than 50%, as was previously the case.

The government has said offenders jailed for violent offences with sentences of at least four years, sex offenders and domestic abusers were not eligible.

Last month 1,700 prisoners were freed under the scheme and a further 1,100 will be released on Tuesday.

The policy is due to be reviewed in 18 months.

Advertisement

The government has defended the scheme saying it had “inherited prisons in crisis and on the brink of collapse”.

“Had that happened, the courts would have been unable to hold trials and the police to make arrests,” a government spokesperson added.

The Conservatives have said the government “badly managed” the scheme creating “serious public concern” about the process.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Politics

Where Harris and Trump Stand on Abortion

Published

on

Where Harris and Trump Stand on Abortion

In the first presidential election since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald J. Trump bring sharply different records on abortion. Maggie Astor, a political reporter for The New York Times, describes where the candidates stand on the issue.

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Starmer and Streeting invite ‘entire nation’ to contribute to consultation on reforming NHS – UK politics live | Politics

Published

on

Severin Carrell

Starmer and Streeting invite ‘entire nation’ to contribute to consultation on reforming NHS

Good morning. When the Labour government came into power, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, declared on his first day in office “the policy of this department is that the NHS is broken”. The government is going to published a 10-year health plan to fix it, and it is due to be published next spring.

Streeting has said the plan will involve three main elements: moving from analogue to digital; more focus on primary care, not hospital care; and more focus on prevention. Keir Starmer explained them in a speech on the NHS in September.

Advertisement

But today the government asking people who work in the NHS and use it – the “entire nation”, as the Department of Health and Social Care puts it in its news release – to contribute to a consultation how health service should change. The DHSC explains:

Members of the public, as well as NHS staff and experts will be invited to share their experiences views and ideas for fixing the NHS via the online platform, change.nhs.uk, which will be live until the start of next year, and available via the NHS App.

The public engagement exercise will help shape the government’s 10 Year Health Plan which will be published in spring 2025 and will be underlined by three big shifts in healthcare – hospital to community, analogue to digital, and sickness to prevention …

Bold ambitions for the NHS can only be achieved by listening to the expertise and knowledge of its 1.54 million strong workforce. Their understanding of what’s holding them back from performing at their best will help us bring down waiting times and provide the world class care the public deserve.

The government has already taken immediate action to address challenges in the health service and deliver an NHS fit for the future. Whether that’s agreeing a deal with resident doctors within weeks, securing a funding increase for GP practices to manage rising pressures or hiring an extra 1,000 GPs into the NHS by the end of this year, there are both short- and long-term reforms working hand in hand.

Advertisement

Streeting has posted a link to the online consultation page on social media.

Our NHS is broken, but not beaten.

We want your help to fix it.

Today the Prime Minister and I are launching the biggest consultation in NHS history!

Advertisement

Calling all patients, staff and partners – share your views and experiences for our 10 Year Plan 👇🏻https://t.co/KO12G6CK4d pic.twitter.com/YhB7XaXHLm

— Wes Streeting MP (@wesstreeting) October 21, 2024

Governments launch consultations for various reasons. Clearly, when ministers are making big changes to large, important institutions, it makes sense to find out first what the public think, and occasionally these exercise throw up ideas overlooked by the thinktank, policy-making world. But that is not the only, or even the main, function of these initiatives like this. Ensuring people feel consulted can be just as important as finding out what they think.

More importantly, this is also about pitch-rolling – persuading people that an issue matters, and that change is needed. The public don’t need to be told that the NHS needs rescuing; it is regularly at or near the top of problems that people say matter to them most, according to polling. But we are less than two weeks away from a budget that is set to raise the tax burden by a record amount in cash terms (not necessarily as a proportion of GDP) and it is very, very important for the government to convince people that this is happening for reason (like fixing the broken NHS) and not just out of profligacy. Gordon Brown was the master of this; when he put up national insurance to raise money for the NHS, it turned out to be one of the most popular tax rises ever. Today’s NHS consultation is probably more about budget framing than about a scramble for ideas to pad out next year’s 10-year plan.

Advertisement

Here is the agenda for the day.

Morning: Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting, the health secretary, are visiting a health centre in London to launch their public consultation on the NHS’s future.

11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

2.20pm: Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, takes questions in the Commons.

Advertisement

After 3.30pm: Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister and housing secretary, opens the Commons debate on the second reading of the employment rights bill.

If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line (BTL) or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. I’m still using X and I’ll see something addressed to @AndrewSparrow very quickly. I’m also trying Bluesky (@andrewsparrowgdn) and Threads (@andrewsparrowtheguardian).

I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos (no error is too small to correct). And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

Advertisement
Share

Updated at 

Key events

Advertisement

Advertisement

Here are social media posts from two journalists about the plan for digital “patient passports” in the NHS.

From John Burn-Murdoch, the Financial Times’ chief data reporter

Everyone saying “no we can’t let the NHS use a proper joined up digital patient database, it’s all part of a plot to privatise British healthcare and sell your data” should be forced to read the dozens (hundreds?) of case studies like these

Everyone saying “no we can’t let the NHS use a proper joined up digital patient database, it’s all part of a plot to privatise British healthcare and sell your data” should be forced to read the dozens (hundreds?) of case studies like these https://t.co/8VvouoDGY3 pic.twitter.com/qpJEXQaRaG

— John Burn-Murdoch (@jburnmurdoch) October 21, 2024

Advertisement

From Jim Waterson, the former Guardian journalist who now writes the London Centric newsletter on Substack

I hate doing personal posts but: When my mum was dying last year, NHS data sharing failures and prioritising GDPR over pain relief repeatedly left her in agony. In desperation I began to build a Google Doc of her records linked to a QR code for doctors to scan. System’s broken.

Acting Alba party leader says no decision yet taken over whether Sturgeon will be invited to Salmond’s memorial service

Severin Carrell

Severin Carrell

Claims that Nicola Sturgeon has been banned from attending Alex Salmond’s memorial service have been rejected as “premature” by Kenny MacAskill, the acting leader of Alba, the former first minister’s nationalist party.

The Sunday Mail reported at the weekend an Alba source saying there was “not a chance in hell” that Sturgeon would be invited, given the pair’s incendiary split over the allegations of sexual misconduct against Salmond.

Sturgeon and Salmond have not spoken since the allegations emerged following a Scottish government inquiry in 2018. Salmond had repeatedly accused her aides of orchestrating a smear campaign against him – claims Sturgeon has consistently dismissed.

In a statement rejecting the Sunday Mail’s claims, MacAskill said:

Advertisement

Now is the time for Alex’s family to be given the privacy and time to grieve the loss of a beloved husband, brother and uncle.

An announcement will be made in the coming days about arrangements for a private funeral to be attended by his family and close friends.

There will be time in the coming weeks to celebrate his life and commemorate his achievements in a memorial service, the family have yet to make any arrangements for that. All other speculation is premature.

Salmond’s family are expecting to hold a private funeral for the former first minister in his home village of Strichen, Aberdeenshire, next week, where he will also be buried. No date has yet been fixed for a memorial service, though some allies have suggested St Andrew’s Day on 30 November.

It remains unclear whether Sturgeon would expect to be invited. Salmond told a BBC Scotland documentary which aired last month: “It’s a big regret that Nicola and I are no longer on speaking terms and I seriously doubt if it’s going to improve.”

Advertisement

Health minister plays down privacy fears about digital ‘patient passports’, saying it’ll be like ‘online banking’

Stephen Kinnock, the care minister, was giving interviews this morning on behalf of the government. He was promoting the consultation on the future of the NHS, but many of the questions he took were about the government’s plans for a digital “patient passport”, ensuring people’s medical records are all available in one place, through the NHS app. Pippa Crerar and Denis Campbell explain that here.

Kinnock sought to play down concerns that people’s data would be at risk. But, in an interview with Mishal Husain on the Today programme, he was could not give her firm assurances on this point.

When Husain asked if people’s patient records would be available to all 1.5 million NHS employees under the government’s plans, Kinnock said the protocols would be set out in the forthcoming data bill. He went on:

We’re absolutely committed to protecting data, and we need the cyber security in place. Of course, one of the problems is the NHS uses Excel XP which is not conducive to the most modern cyber security techniques. We’ve got to modernize the tech.

Husain said protecting data from cyber attacks was a diferent matter, and she again asked if all NHS employees would be able to access someone’s medical records. Kinnock replied:

Advertisement

What we’re proposing is no different to online banking apps. So this is definitely more NatWest than it is Star Trek. This is a system that is going to be based on common sense, on enabling a single patient record.

In the end, if we don’t modernise the NHS, make it more efficient and productive, you can have the best data protection rules in the world, but you not going to have a health and care system that actually works.

Husain tried twice more to get a clear answer about the restrictions on NHS staff accessing individuals’ records. Kinnock did not say in detail how the system would work, but he said ultimately it was a matter of balance.

You’ve got to have a system that works and that enables the hugely important interface between GPS, hospitals and patients, and to create that single patient record.

That has to be balanced against water tight data protection, and that is the balance that we’re going to strike.

But if you constantly just say, we can’t do this because of data protection concerns, you’re just going to have the status quo going on and on and on, and you’re going to have a system that doesn’t work.

Advertisement
Share

Updated at 

Michael Gove says personal attacks on ex-wife Sarah Vine ‘hurt so much’

Michael Gove has said that the most hurtful part of his political career was the attacks on his former wife, Sarah Vine, Peter Walker reports.

Starmer and Streeting invite ‘entire nation’ to contribute to consultation on reforming NHS

Good morning. When the Labour government came into power, Wes Streeting, the health secretary, declared on his first day in office “the policy of this department is that the NHS is broken”. The government is going to published a 10-year health plan to fix it, and it is due to be published next spring.

Advertisement

Streeting has said the plan will involve three main elements: moving from analogue to digital; more focus on primary care, not hospital care; and more focus on prevention. Keir Starmer explained them in a speech on the NHS in September.

But today the government asking people who work in the NHS and use it – the “entire nation”, as the Department of Health and Social Care puts it in its news release – to contribute to a consultation how health service should change. The DHSC explains:

Members of the public, as well as NHS staff and experts will be invited to share their experiences views and ideas for fixing the NHS via the online platform, change.nhs.uk, which will be live until the start of next year, and available via the NHS App.

The public engagement exercise will help shape the government’s 10 Year Health Plan which will be published in spring 2025 and will be underlined by three big shifts in healthcare – hospital to community, analogue to digital, and sickness to prevention …

Bold ambitions for the NHS can only be achieved by listening to the expertise and knowledge of its 1.54 million strong workforce. Their understanding of what’s holding them back from performing at their best will help us bring down waiting times and provide the world class care the public deserve.

Advertisement

The government has already taken immediate action to address challenges in the health service and deliver an NHS fit for the future. Whether that’s agreeing a deal with resident doctors within weeks, securing a funding increase for GP practices to manage rising pressures or hiring an extra 1,000 GPs into the NHS by the end of this year, there are both short- and long-term reforms working hand in hand.

Streeting has posted a link to the online consultation page on social media.

Our NHS is broken, but not beaten.

We want your help to fix it.

Advertisement

Today the Prime Minister and I are launching the biggest consultation in NHS history!

Calling all patients, staff and partners – share your views and experiences for our 10 Year Plan 👇🏻https://t.co/KO12G6CK4d pic.twitter.com/YhB7XaXHLm

— Wes Streeting MP (@wesstreeting) October 21, 2024

Governments launch consultations for various reasons. Clearly, when ministers are making big changes to large, important institutions, it makes sense to find out first what the public think, and occasionally these exercise throw up ideas overlooked by the thinktank, policy-making world. But that is not the only, or even the main, function of these initiatives like this. Ensuring people feel consulted can be just as important as finding out what they think.

Advertisement

More importantly, this is also about pitch-rolling – persuading people that an issue matters, and that change is needed. The public don’t need to be told that the NHS needs rescuing; it is regularly at or near the top of problems that people say matter to them most, according to polling. But we are less than two weeks away from a budget that is set to raise the tax burden by a record amount in cash terms (not necessarily as a proportion of GDP) and it is very, very important for the government to convince people that this is happening for reason (like fixing the broken NHS) and not just out of profligacy. Gordon Brown was the master of this; when he put up national insurance to raise money for the NHS, it turned out to be one of the most popular tax rises ever. Today’s NHS consultation is probably more about budget framing than about a scramble for ideas to pad out next year’s 10-year plan.

Here is the agenda for the day.

Morning: Keir Starmer and Wes Streeting, the health secretary, are visiting a health centre in London to launch their public consultation on the NHS’s future.

11.30am: Downing Street holds a lobby briefing.

Advertisement

2.20pm: Yvette Cooper, the home secretary, takes questions in the Commons.

After 3.30pm: Angela Rayner, the deputy prime minister and housing secretary, opens the Commons debate on the second reading of the employment rights bill.

If you want to contact me, please post a message below the line (BTL) or message me on social media. I can’t read all the messages BTL, but if you put “Andrew” in a message aimed at me, I am more likely to see it because I search for posts containing that word.

If you want to flag something up urgently, it is best to use social media. I’m still using X and I’ll see something addressed to @AndrewSparrow very quickly. I’m also trying Bluesky (@andrewsparrowgdn) and Threads (@andrewsparrowtheguardian).

Advertisement

I find it very helpful when readers point out mistakes, even minor typos (no error is too small to correct). And I find your questions very interesting too. I can’t promise to reply to them all, but I will try to reply to as many as I can, either BTL or sometimes in the blog.

Share

Updated at 

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

Jenrick accuses Badenoch of being ‘disrepectul’ to Tory members

Published

on

Jenrick accuses Badenoch of being 'disrepectul' to Tory members

Conservative leadership contender Robert Jenrick has attacked his rival, Kemi Badenoch, accusing her of being “disrespectful” to Tory members by failing to set out policies.

The pair are in the final stretches of a campaign to replace Rishi Sunak, who led his party to an historic defeat at the general election in July.

Jenrick, who trailed Badenoch for support in the last voting round of MPs, has previously signed up to the yellow card penalty system introduced at the start of the contest and intended to stop “blue-on-blue” infighting.

He has put policy on immigration – and a commitment to leaving the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) – at the heart of his campaign, whereas Badenoch has accused Jenrick of offering “easy answers” on the issue.

Advertisement

Conservative Party members are currently taking part in an online vote after the field was whittled down to two in a series of votes by MPs.

The vote ends on 31 October, with the victor to be announced two days later on 2 November.

Jenrick said Badenoch needed to set out her stance on “the big issues facing our country”, including whether the UK should remain a member of the ECHR.

He told BBC Radio 4’s Westminster Hour: “I think it’s disrespectful to the members and the public to ask for their votes without saying where you stand on the big issues facing our country today.

Advertisement

“A plan today is what I offer. A promise of a plan at some point in the future is what my opponent offers, and I don’t think that’s the way to rebuild the public’s trust and confidence in us.”

He insisted that all Conservatives who wanted to stand as a candidate at the next election would have to sign up to leaving the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) if he became their leader.

Badenoch has not ruled out leaving the ECHR, but has repeatedly said there needs to be a bigger plan and not just “a throwaway promise to win a leadership election.”

Her pitch is that the party needs to return to “first principles” and be clear about what it stands for, rather than “throwing out numbers” and “easy answers” or setting out new policy promises or targets that may not be kept.

Advertisement

The duo have two more weeks to make their case to the Conservative members before Sunak’s successor is announced.

The leadership contest has been running since July, when six candidates entered the race, overseen by 1922 committee chair Bob Blackman.

At the time, Blackman said he wold give a yellow card and a public dressing down to any candidate who attacked a rival during the campaign.

He said “constant backbiting and attacking colleagues” by Tory MPs during the last parliament was a key reason “why the party did so badly in the general election”.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Politics

JK Rowling turned down House of Lords peerage twice

Published

on

JK Rowling turned down House of Lords peerage twice

JK Rowling has revealed she turned down two offers of a peerage in the House of Lords and would turn down a third.

The author’s remarks came after Conservative Party leader hopeful Kemi Badenoch said she would give Rowling a peerage for her stance on gender – a position critics have described as being transphobic.

The Harry Potter author said in a post on X that she had been offered peerages “once under Labour and once under the Tories”, adding she “still wouldn’t take it” if offered the honour for a third time.

Most peers sitting in the House of Lords are appointed by the monarch on the prime minister’s advice, with nominations vetted by the House of Lords Appointments Commission.

Advertisement

Badenoch praised Rowling in an interview with the Talk TV online streaming service, saying they both believed protections for women should be based not on self-identified gender but rather biological sex.

The MP for North West Essex said of Rowling: “I don’t know whether she would take it, but I certainly would give her a peerage.”

The former equalities minister went on to praise Baroness Cass for her review of NHS children’s gender services – work Badenoch “managed to get” the doctor a peerage for.

Writing on X, Rowling said: “It’s considered bad form to talk about this but I’ll make an exception given the very particular circumstances.

Advertisement

“I’ve already turned down a peerage twice, once under Labour and once under the Tories. If offered one a third time, I still wouldn’t take it.”

She said in an apparent reference to Badenoch: “It’s not her, it’s me.”

Rowling was awarded an OBE in 2001, and was made a Companion of Honour in 2017 by Prince William, then the Duke of Cambridge, for her work.

While the precise dates the author was offered the two peerages are unclear, the first would have come in the New Labour years, when Rowling was still writing the Harry Potter series.

Advertisement

The final book in Rowling’s best-selling wizard series was published in 2007. In the years since, she has written articles, plays and a series of crime books for adults under the pen name Robert Galbraith.

The crime series, known collectively under the title Cormoran Strike, were published throughout the 2010s – during which time Rowling was presumably offered a peerage for the second time.

If she had taken up a seat in the House of Lords, the author would most likely have been given the title of Baroness Rowling – and if she found the time to attend sessions, she would have a say in the work of Parliament’s second chamber, considering draft laws and potentially participating in select committees.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com