Connect with us

NewsBeat

Cambridge University professor Jason Arday told friend he ‘couldn’t go on’ hours before death

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

His friend had spoken to him yesterday morning

Former University of Cambridge professor Jason Arday told a friend he felt he “couldn’t go on” hours before he died. Prof Arday, who resigned after a plagiarism row, was pronounced dead after emergency services were called to Daley Thompson Way, in Battersea, just after 3pm on Friday August 14 to reports that a man had been found unresponsive inside a property.

Advertisement

The Metropolitan Police said his death is being treated as unexpected, but is not believed to be suspicious. University of Cambridge professor, and director of the Autism Research Centre, Sir Simon Baron-Cohen told the BBC he spoke to Prof Arday on Friday morning.

Sir Simon told Radio 4’s Today programme: “He was being subjected to relentless scrutiny, including ridicule, discrediting absolutely every detail of his life, and he wasn’t coping with the loss of his career, the loss of his reputation, and he felt he couldn’t go on.

“He used those words in voice notes. At the heart of all of this was a man who’d been diagnosed in childhood with disabilities that included autism and language delay and learning differences. He was a vulnerable child, a vulnerable teenager, and a vulnerable adult, so he needed and deserved safeguarding and support and reasonable adjustment every step of the way.”

Sir Simon said Prof Arday was a “kind and gentle” man who had been “bombarded by every media outlet” and used as a “lightning rod” to examine diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies. Prof Arday, a professor of sociology of education who became Cambridge’s youngest black professor in 2023, quit following a series of media reports alleging he plagiarised his PhD thesis – completed at Liverpool John Moores University – and other research.

Advertisement

Further questions were asked in the press about the truth of other claims he made, including saying he ran 600 miles in six days and that he had raised £5.5 million for charity. An investigation at Liverpool John Moores University cleared Prof Arday of wrongdoing.

Sir Simon added: “Jason was being used as almost like a lightning rod to examine this policy of DEI, and Jason was bombarded by every media outlet to paint him as a fraud.” The cognitive neuroscientist said he had grown concerned about the mental health of Prof Arday, a “vulnerable autistic man” that he could see was struggling.

He said: “In the last 10 days, I’ve witnessed his mental health getting worse and worse, as the media didn’t stop ridiculing him, humiliating him, discrediting him. As I said, yesterday morning, his last voice note was that he just couldn’t go on. We need to let the investigations proceed, we need to understand how this tragedy has happened, but there has to be accountability at lots of levels.”

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

NewsBeat

New Beckham book bombshells: Cruz tried to distance self from family name

Published

on

Daily Mirror

The latest explosive claims from new warts-and-all biography about Brand Beckham allege new friction within the famous family with Victoria said to have stepped in to prevent Cruz and Brooklyn deviating from their cultured image

An expose on life behind the veil at Brand Beckham leaves no stone unturned in its claims about David and Victoria’s relationship with their family, and each other. Brand Beckham: The Fame. The Feuds. The Fallout by Alison Boshoff goes into explicit detail about the inner working of the family and how Brooklyn, 27, allegedly wasn’t the only sibling to try and carve a career away from the shadow of the Beckham name. Brooklyn effectively ended his relationship with parents David and Victoria, his siblings and the lucrative family brand following the publication of a lurid six-page statement earlier this year.

Advertisement

Ever since, interest in the machine behind the power family has hit fever pitch. Here are the most explosive claims.

Victoria ‘scuppered’ plans for Cruz to drop Beckham name for the sake of his career

He’s currently half a dozen singles into a burgeoning music career, but Cruz Beckham’s decision to launch himself as the charismatic frontman of indie band The Breakers followed the sacking of his entire management team.

According to Boshoff, concerned mum Victoria stepped in after management firm TaP attempted to separate the young musician from Brand Beckham and inevitable nepo baby connotations by dropping his surname and playing a series of ‘ordinary London pubs… to make his rise look more organic.’

Advertisement

The former Spice Girl’s subsequent decision to share footage of Cruz performing at film director friend Guy Ritchie’s pub went against their plans, and TaP ‘parted company’ with Cruz ‘on friendly terms,’ with a source adding: ‘The whole point was to distance him from being Posh Spice’s baby boy – she scuppered it.”

Cruz eventually relaunched his career with the Breakers in October 2025, with parents David and Victoria promoting his music across their own hugely followed social media channels as he prepared to release his first single, the double-A side Optics/For Your Love.

Victoria allegedly stopped Brooklyn from launching a fashion line

The book claims fashion designer Victoria, 52, also denied Brooklyn use of his own surname after he planned to launch a £3million clothing range with affordable online brand BoohooMan, purportedly because of its association with ‘fast fashion’ – despite previously launching her own cost-effective range with Target.

According to sources, Victoria had a ‘change of heart’ after initially agreeing to the use of his surname. “It did get into a bit of the war with the brand,” an insider told Boshoff. “And the deal then did not happen.”

Advertisement

Brooklyn ‘feels the pain’ and is ‘so sad’ about family estrangement

Despite the acrimony, the US based cooking influencer allegedly mourns the absence of his immediate family, with friends claiming he feels the ‘pain of separation keenly’ and is ‘so sad about it still.’

Additionally, actress wife Nicola Peltz, 31, is believed to be open to her husband maintaining a relationship with his immediate family and will ‘never stop’ him travelling to the UK for a potential reunion, despite being ‘over’ the ongoing drama herself.

Nicola Peltz and Victoria are ‘very similar’

Victoria’s notorious wedding dance with Brooklyn is one of the biggest takeaways from his six-page Instagram statement, but sources claim there are distinct parallels between the former Spice Girl and her daughter-in-law, Nicola.

Advertisement

According to the book, Brooklyn ‘married his mother’ after exchanging vows with Nicola at her family’s sprawling Florida home in 2022. ‘Nicola and Victoria are very similar people,’ a source added.

Friends also claimed how Brooklyn was often naïve while dating and became easily ‘besotted’ by girlfriends, among them influencer Hana Cross, long before his first meeting with Nicola.

It’s claimed the family members expressed concern over his ability to be ‘absorbed’ by whoever he is dating with the alleged comment: ‘If they like poodles, he likes poodles.’

Advertisement

Victoria had a ‘low status’ in The Spice Girls and was repeatedly teased by one bandmate

Girl Power may well have been the ethos that turned them into global icons, but female empowerment didn’t always extend to The Spice Girls’ attitudes towards each other, according to the new book.

Famed for her Posh Spice moniker, Victoria allegedly had a ‘low status in the band’ and was frequently teased by her bandmates – notably Scary Spice Mel B.

Following the departure of Geri Halliwell the group eventually embarked on respective solo careers in 2000, but the financial lure of The Spice Girls brand prompted a tense reunion in 2007, during which Geri ‘annoyed everyone.’

Advertisement

Victoria later claimed The Spice Girls’ publicist once told her to say her famous black tube dresses were purchased at Gucci – ‘even though they were from Miss Selfridge.’

The Mirror approached representatives for Victoria, David, Brooklyn and Cruz Beckham, Boohoo Man, Mel B and Geri Halliwell for comment.

Brand Beckham: The Fame. The Feuds. The Fallout by Alison Boshoff is available to purchase now.

Like this story? For more of the latest showbiz news and gossip, follow Mirror Celebs on TikTok , Snapchat , Instagram , Twitter , Facebook , YouTube and Threads .

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Elegant Cambridgeshire wedding venue with 18-carat gold leaf ceiling and wartime secret

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

It has been named among the best wedding venues in the county

A wedding day is one of the most important events in a couple’s love story and making the right decisions to create a wedding they will remember for the rest of their lives is a delicate matter. Thankfully, Cambridgeshire is home to so many beautiful venues to tie the knot.

Advertisement

However, one wedding venue featuring a gold room with an 18-carat gold leaf ceiling and an intriguing wartime past to impress the history enthusiasts particularly stands out. Holmewood Hall is a stunning Tudor Gothic-style manor surrounded by 10 acres of manicured grounds & parkland in the charming village of Holme and near Stilton.

The venue has stunning reception spaces that are steeped in history and exuding elegance. Its ultimate draw is its Gold Room which you can exchange vows in.

The room offers seating for up to 77, a 50-foot-long aisle for a grand entrance, an incredible 18-carat gold leaf ceiling, period fireplace and huge stained glass windows.

Holmewood Hall dates back to 1611 when it was sold to the 1st Baronet of Connington, Sir Robert Cotton. Later, the Cotton family went on to sell the manor to London merchant Thomas Truman.

Advertisement

After his death in 1769, Truman passed all of his Huntingdonshire estates including the now-loved wedding venue to Elizabeth, his niece, and her husband William Wells. The Wells family, who were responsible for much of the hall that can be seen presently, went on to built a beautiful legacy.

Work began again on site in 1873 and and it became virtually unrecognisable from the buildings that had stood there previously. The great hall and staircase were inspired by the Jacobean era, whilst the original drawing room was transformed into the venue’s iconic Gold Room.

Following the death of Sir William Wells in 1889, the house was passed onto John Ashton Fielden, one of the richest men in England.

Four decades later, Holmewood Hall took on a completely different role in wartime Britain as a base for the US Office of Strategic Services (OSS). Fast forward to nowadays, the venue has become a highly sought-after venue for couples to say ‘I do’.

Advertisement

Its website states: “With Personal Wedding Managers to guide you and a dedicated team of chefs to create your bespoke menu, the team at Holmewood Hall are backed by 25 years of experience in making wedding dreams come true.”

Depending on whether the weather is kind, the Mr and Mrs to be can have a magical outdoors ceremony at The Bandstand. The happy couple can experience dining to remember in the Banqueting Hall with captivating views across the lake, then party the night away in the Vault.

To complete your dreams, the venue offers 18 bedroom suites, including a bridal suite for the couple and their guests to retire to at the end of a long and beautiful day.

Advertisement

It was also named among the most popular wedding venues in Cambridgeshire by Hitched, the wedding tech platform, also globally known as The Knot, in its Wedding Awards for 2026.

With 4.6 stars out of five on Google, this wedding venue is truly sought after. One person wrote: “Holmewood Hall is the most stunning venue, and one my family, and I had the pleasure of experiencing prior to it being a wedding venue.

“We always knew this would be the place me and my now husband would choose for our magical day. The building is steeped in so much history, and the architecture and extensive grounds speak for itself. It is truly a royal, hidden gem.”

Another wedded pair said: “Even from our first visit, we fell in love with the venue and grounds, and knew we wanted to get married there. The bridal suite in particular completely blew us away, it is such a stunning room!”

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Trump says he will declare the Strait of Hormuz a US territory

Published

on

Trump says he will declare the Strait of Hormuz a US territory

Donald Trump has threatened to declare the Strait of Hormuz a US territory, escalating his rhetoric over control of the waterway amid the war with Iran.

The US president said he would make the designation “pretty soon”, as Tehran and Washington remain at an impasse over the future of the strait nearly six months after it was closed when the US and Israel launched their war on 28 February.

“After we finish defeating Iran, which is being very badly defeated, pretty soon I’ll be declaring the Hormuz strait a territory of the United States,” Mr Trump told a crowd of law enforcement officers.

“Essentially, that’s what it is. We have the blockade. No ships get through unless we want them to.”

Advertisement
Donald Trump claims Iran is being ‘badly defeated’
Donald Trump claims Iran is being ‘badly defeated’ (AFP via Getty)

Iran has remained defiant in its stance, calling on the US to accept defeat and declaring that Tehran had decided not to resume talks.

“This strait will be opened and closed only under Iran’s command, and so long as you do not accept the reality of defeat and stop indulging in fantasies, Iran will continue to enforce the blockade,” Iran’s deputy foreign minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, posted on X early on Saturday.

On Friday, just two vessels passed through the Strait of Hormuz with no crude oil shipments visible, according to analysis from ship-tracking firm Kpler. Before the war, more than 130 ships would transit the strait daily.

Foreign minister Abbas Araghchi told Iranian news outlet Shahrara News in an interview published on Saturday that Washington must meet Iran’s conditions on the strait in order for shipping to resume.

Vessels transit the Strait of Hormuz off Bandar Abbas in southern Iran on 10 August
Vessels transit the Strait of Hormuz off Bandar Abbas in southern Iran on 10 August (AFP/Getty)

Addressing the June ceasefire which has been left in tatters, Mr Araghchi added: “We did not have a ceasefire in the first place that we would now want to extend. We had ‘the end of the war’, and now there is a new situation.”

But Mr Trump, speaking to a political rally in New York’s Garden City, warned Americans they will have to accept higher gas prices as the war continues.

Advertisement

That paying “a tiny little bit more for your gasoline” is worth it to ensure “a very evil country” cannot have a nuclear weapon, is one of the president’s stated rationales for the war.

The average US price of a gallon of gasoline was about $4.08 (£3.02) on Friday, up 29 per cent from a year earlier, according to the American Automobile Association.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Manchester United vs AC Milan LIVE confirmed squad, early team news and how to watch fixture vs Ruben Amorim

Published

on

Manchester Evening News

Tyrone Marshall

It makes sense to play as close as possible a team to the one that will start against Hull here, which is what I would do. That means Lammens in goal, obviously. Dalot and Shaw are clearly the first-choice full-backs and I’d play Maguire and Yoro together at centre-back.

Midfield is a tricky one, because it was Mount, but his injury is now something of a mystery. Tielemans is ahead of Mainoo from a fitness point of view so has to start alongside Santos, who is a lock in midfield. Fernandes should also be ready to start his first game of pre-season.

Sesko’s absence also remains a concern and even if he is fit next week, there is no way he can start. Mbeumo has been very good at centre-forward, Amad can continue on the right and I’d start Cunha on the left.

Advertisement

Steven Railston

It’s the final game of pre-season, so it’s advantageous for the line-up to mirror the XI who will start on the opening day of the campaign against Hull. Maguire should start alongside Yoro if he’s fit.

Mount missed the game against Leeds in Dublin as a precaution and I would have brought him back into the team if he had been included, but he’s absent again, so Tielemans should start instead.

Mbeumo is nailed on to start down the middle again. Dorgu hasn’t really done much wrong on the left wing, but his final ball lacked a bit against Leeds, so I would like to see Cunha given a chance from the first whistle.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Manchester United vs AC Milan LIVE: Match stream, latest team news, lineups, TV, prediction

Published

on

Manchester United vs AC Milan LIVE: Match stream, latest team news, lineups, TV, prediction

Kobbie Mainoo and Lisandro Martinez also return following their post-World Cup breaks, though United remain without Benjamin Sesko as they build up to next weekend’s Premier League opener against Hull. The Red Devils held their nerve to defeat rivals Leeds on penalties following a 1-1 draw in Dublin in midweek, having also impressed against Paris Saint-Germain, Atletico Madrid and Rosenborg after beginning the summer with a narrow defeat by Wrexham.

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Can a vaccine built for one Ebola virus stop another? The World Health Organization is about to find out

Published

on

Can a vaccine built for one Ebola virus stop another? The World Health Organization is about to find out

The World Health Organization (WHO) has recommended prioritising the Ervebo vaccine for testing in a clinical trial in the Democratic Republic of the Congo. The vaccine was originally developed to protect against Zaire ebolavirus, the species responsible for the devastating west African epidemic just over a decade ago. It was not designed for the Bundibugyo species responsible for the current outbreak – which raises the question of why scientists are considering it at all.

The current Ebola outbreak was declared a public health emergency of international concern in May 2026. By August 9, there had been 4,402 confirmed cases and 2,013 deaths. All but 21 of these cases were reported in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), with 20 cases in Uganda and one in France.

These figures make the current outbreak the second-largest Ebola epidemic on record, surpassed only by the west African epidemic of 2014–16, where 11,000 people died.

At present, there are around 75–100 new cases being reported each day. The UN has described it as the fastest-growing Ebola outbreak ever recorded. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, the director general of the WHO, said the current outbreak is on track to become the world’s largest.

Advertisement

Unfortunately, there is still no clear evidence that the outbreak is coming under control, and the number of infections may still be rising rapidly.

Ebola outbreaks are usually brought under control through a combination of vaccination and public health measures. During an outbreak, vaccines can be particularly effective, especially when used quickly.

Health authorities may carry out large-scale vaccination campaigns. They can also use a strategy known as “ring vaccination”. This involves offering the vaccine to people who have been in close contact with someone who has been infected. The aim is to create a protective ring around each case and stop the virus from spreading further.

Advertisement
Ring vaccination explained.

Public health measures are also crucial. These include finding cases early, tracing contacts and moving infected people to specialist treatment centres where they can be cared for safely and isolated from others until they recover. Caring for someone who is seriously ill with Ebola carries a particularly high risk of infection.

Public education is also important, including advice on caring for patients safely and reducing the risk of transmission during funerals.

No licensed vaccine

The challenge is that, unlike the Zaire species of Ebola, there is currently no licensed vaccine for Bundibugyo virus disease. There are also no licensed vaccines for some other Ebola species, including Sudan virus disease and Taï Forest virus disease. As a result, vaccination has not yet played a role in controlling the outbreak.

Several Bundibugyo vaccines are under development. Two have already entered phase 1 clinical trials. One has been developed by Oxford University and the Serum Institute of India, while another is being developed by Moderna.

Advertisement



À lire aussi :
Two scientists on their race to make a new Ebola vaccine


A phase 1 clinical trial is the first stage of testing a new vaccine in people. These studies are mainly designed to assess safety and identify any side-effects. It is not yet clear how long it will take before these vaccines could become widely available if they prove successful. Neither are being tested in Africa.

Without a vaccine, efforts to control the outbreak depend entirely on public health measures. But putting these measures into practice can be difficult, especially during a fast-moving outbreak.

Fear and uncertainty are common during outbreaks of dangerous diseases. Misinformation and rumours can spread quickly. During the west African Ebola epidemic, reports suggested that some families hid sick relatives because they feared they would be taken away by health authorities. In some settings, there have also been reports of mistrust towards official responses to outbreaks and concerns about the motives of outside organisations involved in disease control efforts.

Advertisement

The current situation in the DRC is made even more difficult by the ongoing armed conflict in some of the affected areas. Conflict can make it much harder for health workers to reach communities, track cases and implement control measures.

There have already been several attacks on Ebola treatment centres in the country this year. In one incident, a treatment centre was set on fire after a dispute over the handling of the body of an infected person.

Another worrying sign is that many newly diagnosed patients had not previously been identified as contacts of earlier cases. This suggests that the virus may be spreading unnoticed in some communities.

Against this backdrop, the WHO advisory group has recommended testing the Ervebo vaccine.

Advertisement

Ervebo was developed to protect against the Zaire species of Ebola and is estimated to be around 84% effective against that species from ten days after a single dose.

Why scientists are considering using it in the current outbreak

The idea that it might also help against Bundibugyo has been raised before. In 2011, researchers found that a single dose protected monkeys from dying after they were later exposed to the Bundibugyo virus. Animals that survived also developed less severe illness and had lower levels of virus in their bodies.

Researchers have also found signs that the vaccine stimulates an immune response against Bundibugyo in people. In 2019, scientists reported that people who received Ervebo produced antibodies that recognised the Bundibugyo virus, although the response was weaker than the one seen against the Zaire species. A more recent study has confirmed these findings.

That leaves an open question: how well Ervebo actually works against Bundibugyo in the real world.

Advertisement

The available evidence suggests that Ervebo can trigger an immune response against the Bundibugyo virus. However, scientists still do not know how well it works against this species in real-world conditions.

The animal studies provide reasons for optimism. If the vaccine offers even partial protection, it could reduce the number of deaths. By lowering the amount of virus in infected people, it might also help reduce transmission.

Researchers also need to investigate whether additional doses could strengthen protection.

For now, the important question is whether Ervebo can provide meaningful protection while purpose-built Bundibugyo vaccines are still being developed. With the outbreak continuing to grow and control efforts facing significant difficulties, clinical trials could provide urgently needed answers.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

Strictly Come Dancing: It Takes Two host revealed! Ellie Taylor takes over from axed presenters four years after appearing as a contestant

Published

on

Strictly Come Dancing host Emma Willis has revealed that Ellie Taylor has been named as the new presenter for the spin-off show

Strictly Come Dancing: It Takes Two will be hosted by former contestant Ellie Taylor, it has been announced today ahead of the new series of the show.

Emma Willis, 50, who hosts a Saturday lunchtime show on BBC Radio 2, was the first to share the news publicly after months of speculation.

Ellie joined Emma on her programme for a ‘Strictly special’ where her new role was announced, as Emma gushed she is ‘so glad they are in it together’. 

Emma told listeners: ‘With me right now is the brand new host of It Takes Two! Mystery host of It Takes Two…,’ before revealing it was Ellie.

Advertisement

Ellie said: ‘I am over the moon! I feel giddy. So nice to get the secret out. I’ve had the theme tune in my head since I found out… I was like stop it woman!

‘It was the same when I found out I was a contestant. I am so thrilled to be back in the Strictly world. I found out a month ago, but I’ve been a good girl.

Strictly Come Dancing host Emma Willis has revealed that Ellie Taylor has been named as the new presenter for the spin-off show

Advertisement
Ellie pictured arriving to Emma's BBC Radio 2 show on Saturday

Ellie pictured arriving to Emma’s BBC Radio 2 show on Saturday

‘I told mummy and my partner. I didn’t tell the kids.’ 

Sharing a statement about the news, Ellie said: ‘What a total joy to return to Strictly in this new role. I feel incredibly honoured to follow in the footsteps of the phenomenal line-up of hosts who’ve made Strictly – It Takes Two so loved over the years. 

‘I can’t wait to immerse myself in all the gossip and sequins flying out of the ballroom in order to bring my fellow Strictly fans everything they need to know. I’m so excited, I could cha cha! (But I won’t – don’t worry… no one needs to see that again.)’

Advertisement

Ellie was hotly tipped to be announced as the new host of the show earlier this month after the former hosts were axed in this year’s huge show revamp.

The show has had a huge overhaul ahead of the 2026 series as main presenters Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman have been replaced by Emma, Josh and Johannes while several pros have been given the boot. 

A source has told The Sun: ‘Ellie was hugely popular with viewers when she appeared as a contestant on Strictly in 2022, and her infectious personality was also a hit with the senior production team.

‘She very much featured in the discussions when they were looking to replace Tess Daly and Claudia Winkleman on the main show, and although she didn’t get that job, she remained in the executive team’s thoughts.

Advertisement

‘They were very keen to get her on It Takes Two which they felt was too boring and needed a major revamp. So she’s been hired for the It Takes Two hosting job.’

Most recently, Fleur East and Janette Manrara hosted It Takes Two during the 2025 series but it was announced that they were being replaced.

Ellie appeared as a contestant on the show in 2022 with professional partner Johannes Radebe, who was announced as one of the main show's new hosts

Ellie appeared as a contestant on the show in 2022 with professional partner Johannes Radebe, who was announced as one of the main show’s new hosts

Emma pictured arriving to BBC studios ahead of announcing the news on her show

Emma pictured arriving to BBC studios ahead of announcing the news on her show

Advertisement

Emma has returned to her regular slot after ‘a few weeks off’ on holiday, but revealed she was now back into the swing of work and ready to kickstart Strictly season.

She said that Friday was her ‘first full work day’ with her co-hosts with Josh Widdicombe and Johannes Radebe as they filled the day doing press for the show.

Emma told listeners: ‘It’s a Strictly special. Because I’m going to introduce you to the brand new host of It Takes Two, they’re in the building and coming into the studio!

Yesterday Strictly Come Dancing’s new hosts Emma and Johannes were seen arriving for a photoshoot alongside the stars of this year’s series.

Advertisement

In October, Tess Daly caused shockwaves when she announced she was stepping down from hosting after 21 years alongside her co-host Claudia Winkleman, who had fronted the show alongside Tess for 15 years.

After months of speculation, in May it was announced Emma and Johannes, 39, would be joining Josh Widdicombe in hosting the show, following a bloodbath among the line-up of pros – of which Johannes was previously included.

While the duo looked delighted to be arriving, there has been much discussion over the line-up – with some branding the cast ‘the worst to date’.

Some of the best known of the line-up are Dani Dyer, Delta Goodrem, Jaime Winstone, Will Best and Gavin & Stacey actress Melanie Walters, however many of the stars have been deemed unrecognisable to viewers. 

Advertisement
After months of speculation, in May it was announced Emma and Johannes, 39, would be joining Josh Widdicombe in hosting the show, following a bloodbath among the line-up of pros – of which Johannes was previously included

After months of speculation, in May it was announced Emma and Johannes, 39, would be joining Josh Widdicombe in hosting the show, following a bloodbath among the line-up of pros – of which Johannes was previously included

Emma looked sensational in an androgynous ensemble comprising a cropped, unbuttoned waistcoat layered over a sleeveless shirt and trousers. 

She wore her trademark cropped locks slicked back while wearing minimal make-up and thin wired glasses for her big first day.

While he may be used to the dancefloor, Johannes was taking on a whole different job as he too headed in sporting a slick white jumper. 

Advertisement

Strictly is one of the BBC‘s most popular shows, with millions tuning in every weekend and the professional dancers quickly becoming household names. 

This year, however, there’s been one big problem – that the dancers are better known than the ‘stars’ they’re set to partner up with. 

YouTuber John, for example, doesn’t even have a Wikipedia page. 

But that doesn’t seem to matter to producers, who are said to have specifically selected stars who have large social media followings.

Advertisement

Stars such as Kim Kardashian’s hair stylist Chris might not be a household name, but he does boast a huge social media following with 4million fans on Instagram. 

John has an even bigger fanbase, with 15.7million YouTube subscribers.

However, loyal fans have been left scratching their heads over the lineup, with many of the comments on the Strictly social posts asking who the celebrity is, rather than expressing any excitement. 

Indeed, while bosses may be keen to attract Gen Z (14 to 29 years old), the majority of Strictly viewers are currently Gen X (46 to 61 years old) and Baby Boomers (62 to 80 years old).  

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

NewsBeat

New flats could be built on site of historic buildings

Published

on

Cambridgeshire Live

Plans to convert the pair of Grade-II listed buildings have been approved

Plans to convert a pair of listed buildings in Wisbech which formerly hosted a solicitors’ office into flats have been approved. A design and access statement from Swann Edwards Architecture said the former Metcalfe, Copeman and Pettefar offices were no longer viable as commercial space and the proposal would bring the empty building back into use.

Advertisement

They said the three-storey mid-terraced buildings at 5-6 York Row had been unused for a “significant period” after the company moved to The Boathouse Business Centre. Mr A Koseoglu submitted the application to Fenland District Council seeking permission to change the empty offices into nine one-bedroom flats.

Along with this, a separate application was also put to the council for internal and external works to the Grade-II listed buildings. An extension would also be built on the back to allow for a kitchen and bathroom in one of the ground floor flats.

The Wisbech Society objected to the plans as, even though they felt putting the buildings back to residential use would be “an excellent choice”, it would be overdevelopment.

They felt that a building of this age wouldn’t be suitable for the plumbing and sewerage infrastructure to accommodate the number of residents and they would like to see a reduced number of flats.

Advertisement

But the council’s planning officer said the proposal would be an “effective re-use” of the building and “secure the long-term reuse and preservation of two vacant Grade-II listed buildings”.

They said any harm caused was outweighed by the benefits of restoring the buildings and approved the application on Thursday (August 13).

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

How to get sun cream stains out of clothes? Expert tips

Published

on

How to get sun cream stains out of clothes? Expert tips

Whether you’re enjoying a day at the beach or simply out for a walk, sun cream is a must for protecting your skin.

Unfortunately, it can also leave stubborn marks on clothing, a problem recently raised by a user in the Mrs Hinch Cleaning Tips group who struggled to remove stains from cotton tops.

Despite soaking the tops in Napisan, washing at 40C with Vanish White Oxi Action, and drying them in the sun, the user said the stains remained and asked: “Is there anything else I can do before I have to bin them?”

Pre-treating sun cream stains on clothes is important before washing them (Image: Getty Images)

A number of clothing and cleaning experts have shared their best tips for getting sun cream stains out of clothes.

Advertisement

How to get sun cream stains out of clothes

Catherine Green, a sustainable cleaning expert at smol, said: “While slapping on the SPF is absolutely essential, the oils and minerals can leave behind nightmare yellow stains on our clothes that are a real pain to shift.

“Annoyingly, they often don’t show up until they’ve been through the wash because chemical UV filters (especially avobenzone) react with minerals like iron or calcium in your tap water.

“But don’t panic, getting rid of this unwanted summer staple is actually pretty straightforward.”

Ms Green advised acting quickly by taking off the garment, rinsing the stain under cold water, and gently massaging a small amount of washing up liquid into the area.

Advertisement

She said: “Soak the stained area in a mixture of one cup of distilled white vinegar to two litres of cold water, for 20 minutes, before putting it in the wash.

“The vinegar will naturally help break down those stubborn minerals and oils.

“I definitely wouldn’t recommend the tumble dryer, as the high heat can permanently trap any residual stains right into the clothing fibres.”

Noor de Swart, founder and CEO of Super Label Store, suggested a different approach for white cotton items.

Advertisement

She said: “If it’s a white cotton top and the yellow mark is still there, you can try a paste of baking soda and water.

“Leave it sitting on the area for around half an hour and then rinse it out.

“It might take another try if the stain has already been there for a while.

“I’d be a bit more careful with coloured clothes, because some of the things people use at home for stains can also take colour out.

Advertisement

“Lemon juice and hydrogen peroxide are good examples of that, so test it somewhere hidden first rather than finding out on the front of the shirt.”

It is recommended to avoid tumble drying sun cream stained clothes (Image: Getty Images)

Chloe Blanchfield, product marketing manager at Hisense, recommended pre-treating the stain before washing and said to use a gentle cycle.

She said: “When putting suncream-stained items in the washing machine, you should ensure you wash on a gentle cycle, using a low temperature at around 30°C and add a mild detergent to prevent aggravating the stain.

“Make sure to avoid a hot water cycle as this can set the stain, and consider adding a stain remover to the cycle for even more targeted removal.”

Advertisement

Rosie Webbon, swimwear buyer at Pour Moi, offered advice for stains on swimming costumes.

She said: “Keep everything cool – rinse, soak and wash in cool or lukewarm water.

“Hot water breaks down elastane over time, so your swimwear will lose its shape and stretch much faster if washed warm.

“Be gentle when treating the stain – swap the toothbrush scrub for fingers or a soft cloth.”

Advertisement

Discussing an approach for white clothes, Nicola Barker, Head of Buying at Suit Direct, said: “If you have some yellow staining on your whites from suncream, avoid bleach or whitening powders which can worsen the stains and cause pink and red stains to develop.”


Recommended reading:


She continued: “After using these pre-treatments, pop your whites in a cool or warm cycle using your regular detergent, avoiding whitening powders.

“Instead of tumble drying, air dry your clothes in an area with good sunlight exposure – the UV rays will act as a natural bleaching agent and help fade any remaining yellow marks.”

Advertisement

Gail Downie, head of garment technology at M&S, advised air drying after washing and warned against using heat until you’re sure the stain is gone.

She said: “Whilst this technique can help lift suncream stains, I would be cautious with delicate fabrics.

“Be warned, some substances can lighten or damage some fabrics.”

“Make sure to test on a discreet small area first or alternatively, use more conventional laundry products which are tested on a breadth of materials.”

Advertisement

Have you faced issues getting sun cream stains out of clothes? Let us know in the comments.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

NewsBeat

6 questions you need to avoid paying TV licence fee

Published

on

6 questions you need to avoid paying TV licence fee

A standard TV licence costs £180 for colour televisions and £60.50 for black and white sets, but not everyone is required to pay the fee.

Those who do not meet these criteria can submit a “No Licence Needed” declaration through the TV Licensing website.

The form uses a series of yes or no questions to determine eligibility.

If you have not previously notified TV Licensing, additional questions will follow.

Advertisement

TV Licensing warns that, if you declare you do not need a licence, you may be subject to a home visit.

It says: “If you tell us you don’t need a licence, we may visit you to check.

“If we then find that you have been watching, recording or streaming programmes illegally, you risk prosecution and a fine of up to £1,000 (£2,000 in Guernsey) plus any legal costs and compensation you may be ordered to pay.”

What six questions do you need to answer to not need a TV licence?

Before completing the declaration, TV Licensing asks a series of questions to confirm eligibility:

Advertisement
  1. Do you or does anyone in your household ever watch TV on any channel? For example, on ITV, Channel 5, Channel 4, BBC or Dave?
  2. Do you or does anyone in your household ever watch TV on any TV service? For example, on Sky, BT, Virgin Media or Freeview?
  3. Do you or does anyone in your household ever watch TV live on any streaming service? For example, on ITVX, Sky Go, Prime Video, YouTube.
  4. Do you or does anyone in your household ever watch foreign channels on TV or live online, for example, on ZeeTV or Al Jazeera?
  5. Can you confirm that you and your household never watch BBC iPlayer? Watching S4C on demand doesn’t require a licence.
  6. Can you confirm that you and your household never record TV, for example, on Sky, BT, Virgin Media or Freeview?

Not paying for a TV licence could lead to a £1,000 fine if someone is found to be watching, recording or downloading live TV (Image: Getty Images)

If you answer “no” to the first four questions and “yes” to the last two, the website will display a message stating: “Based on your answers, it looks like you don’t need a TV Licence.”

However, it is important to note that live content on platforms like YouTube or Prime Video may still require a licence.

TV Licensing’s guidance reads: “If you are watching a TV programme live on YouTube, you need to be covered by a TV Licence.

“A licence is not required to view user generated content, clips and videos on YouTube.

Advertisement

“This includes live streamed content that is not part of a television broadcast. Or being broadcast at the same time by other means.”

A licence is required to watch live content on Amazon Prime or Netflix, but not for on-demand viewing.

For Disney Plus, the guidance states: “You don’t need a TV Licence to watch on-demand programmes on Disney Plus.”

Advertisement

Recommended reading:


What is the fine for not paying for a TV licence?

TV Licensing states that not paying for a TV licence could lead to a £1,000 fine.

This would be a possibility if someone has been watching, recording or downloading programmes illegally.

It adds: “We could visit your address to confirm if you need a TV Licence.

Advertisement

“If we find that you have been watching, recording or streaming programmes illegally, you risk prosecution and a fine for not having a TV Licence of up to £1,000 plus any legal costs and/or compensation you may be ordered to pay.”

Do you think it is worth paying for a TV licence, or has it become too expensive? Let us know in the comments.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025