Politics
The scandalous climate bill that will give Labour UNCHALLENGED power to pursue net zero that’s going under the radar
The shocking details of a bill giving the government unprecedented power to pursue net zero and other eco-goals have been revealed.
The ‘Climate and Nature Bill’, which will have its second reading on Friday, will legally bind the UK government and the Secretary of State for Energy to achieving net zero and a slew of other green targets described by some as ‘national self-harm’.
The legislation, which is being led by Lib Dem MP Roz Savage, will give Labour legal cover to rigorously pursue climate targets.
Critics say it has the potential to erode personal freedoms under the guise of addressing climate crises and could devastate rural economies, enforce invasive carbon tracking and strip property rights from rural folk.
The legislation states ‘the Secretary of State must achieve the following objectives’, which include reducing greenhouse gas emissions to net zero, taking responsibility for ‘offshored’ emissions via exports and imports, and preventing the world from warming by 1.5 degrees.
It also states the Secretary of State must ‘ensure the end of the exploration, extraction, export and import of fossil fuels by the United Kingdom as rapidly as possible,’ inviting concerns the UK may harm its energy security in pursuit of green credentials.
Other objectives include ‘fulfilling the Paris Climate agreement,’ ‘halting and reversing the degradation and loss of nature in the United Kingdom and overseas’ and ensuring ‘nature is visibly and measurably on the path of recovery.’
Critics have argued the government could use the bill as legal cover to seize farmers’ land for rewilding projects, harming the UK’s food security and destroying rural economies.
Roz Savage, Lib Dem MP and leader of the Climate and Nature Bill
HoC Official Portrait
It could also provide legal cover for land requisitions for vast solar panel farms, scores of wind turbines and other green energy producing infrastructure across Britain’s countryside.
Sceptics also highlight the potential skyrocketing of energy prices as the UK government is legally required to move away from fossil fuels to expensive green energy.
Hikes to energy prices, which have already happened under Labour, would tip many businesses and families struggling with the cost of living over the edge.
This could also make travel prohibitively expensive, something Labour have been accused of eyeing to encourage people into electric cars.
Critics have also warned how the legislation could weaken the UK internationally, making us dependent on foreign imports from countries like China.
It comes after Donald Trump promised to scale up the US’s fossil fuels industry, telling the world America was going to ‘drill, baby, drill’, a move that has buoyed the energy industry in the US.
The bill has split opinion, receiving widespread support from MPs, faith leaders, businesses, seventeen union leaders and eco cheerleaders Dale Vince and Chris Packham.
GB News’ Bev Turner has taken a dim view of the legislation, however.
– YouTube
The proposed legislation will also require itself to have a ‘positive impact’ on ‘local communities with a high deprivation’, ‘young people’ and ‘people with protected characteristics’ like religion, race, transgender status and age.
OBJECTIVES IN FULL
As laid out by Zero Hour, the campaign for the Climate and Nature Bill, the bill’s objectives include:
- Limit the UK’s total CO2 emissions to no more than its proportionate share of the IPCC’s remaining global carbon budget, for a 67% chance of limiting heating to 1.5°C.
- Reduce CO2 emissions caused in the manufacture of the goods we import, in line with UK territorial emissions.
- Reduce the UK’s emissions of methane and other greenhouse gases, at rates consistent with the last chance of limiting global heating to 1.5°C.
- Ensure the end of the exploration, extraction, export and import of fossil fuels by the UK as rapidly as possible.
- Ensure that steps taken to mitigate emissions minimise damage to ecosystems, food and water availability, and human health, as far as possible.
- Restore and expand natural ecosystems, and enhance the management of cultivated ecosystems, to protect and enhance biodiversity.
- Include the Mitigation and Conservation Hierarchy so that any development or activity that threatens nature uses this framework to prioritise the protection of nature.
- Address the UK’s entire ecological footprint at home and overseas by accounting for and monitoring the impacts on human health and the destruction of nature; through the production and consumption of goods and services and all relate
The bill was supported by some big names when it was first introduced in March 2024 such as Caroline Lucas (former Green Party leader), Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat leader) and Colum Eastwood (Leader of the Social Democratic and Labour Party).
Roz Savage has been approached for comment.
2025 is Britain’s last chance to avoid a long-term migration catastrophe of Boris Johnson’s making, a leading think tank has warned.
Back in March 2021, Boris Johnson’s Home Secretary Priti Patel introduced the “New Plan for Immigration” to the Commons.
A few months later, the Office for National Statistics announced that 332,000 non-EU migrants had arrived in Britain between June 2020 and June of that year.
A few years later, 1,034,000 non-EU migrants arrived in Britain over the same June-to-June period. A more than 200 per cent increase.
Damning data shows a sharp spike in non-EU migration immediately after Johnson and Patel’s ‘new plan’
UK GOVERNMENT
Patel had hailed what she called a “significant overhaul of our asylum system”. It was “new, comprehensive, fair, but firm”.
She had promised “new rules to stop unscrupulous people posing as children”, a beefed-up Border Force, and “rapid removals” of “those with no right to be here in the UK”.
With Brexit having been delivered, and EU free movement no longer foisted upon the UK, Westminster could now look further afield. At the time, that was Hong Kong, as dissidents to Xi Jinping’s regime found themselves unexpectedly crushed under China’s boot in the former British dependent territory.
Leaving the EU would let Britain be “immigration liberals”, wrote James Forsythe, future Political Secretary to future Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, with Hongkongers in mind.
He had written that the issue on the minds of many Brexit-backers “was control, not immigration levels, per se”.
READ MORE ON BRITAIN’S MIGRATION CHAOS:
Leaving the EU would let Britain be ‘immigration liberals’, wrote James Forsythe
GETTY/THE TIMES
Then, in May 2022 – and midway through an unprecedented surge in arrivals from outside the EU – the Johnson Government’s interpretation of the Australian ‘points-based system’ was accused of having “significantly weakened control” over Britain’s borders.
Those numbers would keep climbing until 2024, the ONS says, and they’re now expected to drop.
That surge has been branded by some as the “Boriswave” – a term which found its origins on social media, and has since made its way to think tanks and political parties alike. On December 29, Reform UK officially adopted the term in a scathing attack on Johnson’s non-European migration surge.
Proponents of the term will argue Johnson and his Government directly oversaw – and allowed the conditions for – millions of non-EU nationals to come to Britain.
And now, with Indefinite Leave to Remain (ILR) open to most of those who arrived via the Work or Family visa route after five years, Britain faces a “ticking clock“.
That’s the warning of Sam Bidwell, of the Adam Smith Institute, who calls for an immediate reform of ILR rules to “limit the long-term harms of the so-called ‘Boriswave’”, which will start being handed ILR for life from early 2026.
The surge in non-EU migration has been branded by some as the ‘Boriswave’
PA
That will give the “Boriswave” the right to taxpayer-funded state benefits, the ability to use the NHS free-of-charge, and the chance to bring in family members – a “cascade of dependents”, as Bidwell put it.
Britain’s system “was not designed to cope with long-term settlement at such scale and pace,” he warns.
Even if Labour manages to deliver 1.5 million new homes between now and 2029, the scale of the non-EU migration wave is such that that tally could be wiped out entirely.
If such a large amount of people are, in fact, here to stay, the consequences could be dire.
Bidwell himself butted heads with ex-Spectator editor Fraser Nelson just days ago after the latter penned an article in The Telegraph headlined: “Britain’s integration miracle is a beacon of hope amid instability.”
Nelson had argued that Britishness – part of which the “Boriswave” could soon comprise – is “a set of values that anyone can adopt”.
But under Johnson and Patel’s “new plan”, the UK has imported millions of people who, as Bidwell says, are “less culturally compatible” than the EU migrants who came before.
He points to damning statistics on integration, like how 52 per cent of British Muslims would support making it illegal to depict the Prophet Mohammed, or how Pakistanis and Bangladeshis in the UK are less employed and take up more social housing than national averages.
Bidwell also casts off “oft-cited figures about Indian high-earners” as a “misrepresentative statistical fudge” directly due to the “Boriswave”.
Thanks to the recent influx of Indian nationals (240,000 in the last year alone, according to the ONS), the median Indian (aged 22-40) now earns less than the national average.
The difficulty of integration may not be so obvious to “the Westminster bubble”, as Reform UK MP Rupert Lowe pointed out on social media.
For them, “integration means cheap labour and exotic food”, but “out in proper Britain, integration has largely not worked”, he says.
“On such a vast scale, it has been an undeniable failure.”
Bidwell’s ILR plans were written before the reemergence of Britain’s grooming gangs scandal – which has thrust mass migration into the spotlight once again.
Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick warned that some of those who have migrated to the UK in recent years have “backward, frankly medieval attitudes to women” – adding that “we have to be very careful about who is coming into this country”.
‘Integration has largely not worked… it has been an undeniable failure,’ Rupert Lowe has warned
GETTY
But Jenrick was Rishi Sunak’s Immigration Minister for more than a year – and oversaw part of the “Boriswave”.
The Tory leadership runner-up shifted from campaigning for Remain in 2016 to his new role as a migration hardliner – which one former Minister blamed on his stint in the Home Office.
Before that, “he was seen as sensible, pragmatic and fairly centrist,” a former Minister told the i last summer.
“He was very good as the Communities Secretary, but he seems to have been radicalised by his time in the Home Office,” they added.
That’s the same Home Office which Sam Bidwell has previously accused of falling victim to “performative empathy“.
Jenrick has been vocal on mass immigration post-leadership bid – sparking fury from ex-Johnson adviser Samuel Kasumu, who claimed to the BBC that he could be “the most divisive person in our political history” and “has the potential to incite hatred in ways that I have never seen”.
But he issued a stark warning last November. “Some parts of our country are unrecognisable from 30 years ago,” Jenrick said.
And, of course, there’s the fiscal impact too.
Robert Jenrick was ‘radicalised by his time in the Home Office’, one former Minister told the i
PA
“According to figures produced by the OBR, the average ‘low-wage migrant worker’ will cost the British taxpayer £465,000 by the time they reach 81 years of age,” Bidwell’s policy recommendation warns.
“According to analysis conducted by Karl Williams, from the Centre for Policy Studies, just 5 per cent of all visas in 2022-23 were given to high-skilled migrants who are likely to be net contributors,” he adds.
Pockets of social media aside, Johnson has largely evaded criticism for overseeing the introduction of so many fiscally harmful and culturally “incompatible” migrants to Britain.
Asked why, Bidwell told GB News: “He still carries a lot of capital with a certain sort of Brexit voter… because he was the face of Vote Leave.
“He has managed to escape scrutiny because many of those voters – particularly older voters in that cohort – will see him as the man who got Brexit done.”
Johnson has escaped scrutiny because voters ‘see him as the man who got Brexit done’
PA
The former PM now “enjoys a kind of comfortable martyrdom” despite the “Boriswave” because “one might argue that he was arguing for an anti-immigration cause”, he added.
Integrating the “wave” will be “a lengthy and difficult process”, Bidwell says.
The solution? Triple the ILR threshold to 15 years.
Britain should put safeguards in place to ensure that “high-quality, compatible” migrants from countries such as the US, Australia, and Canada continue coming to Britain.
And if Labour doesn’t have the mettle, a future Government could one day revoke ILR status from existing holders by amending Section 76 of the Nationality, Immigration, and Asylum Act 2002.
Such a move would doubtless prove unpalatable to the current Government, despite its promises to stem the flow of migration – and even then, only illegal migration.
As Bidwell says, “it seems unlikely” that Labour would do such a thing.
“However”, he adds, “this fact alone does not mean that the British people need to live with the mistakes of the past few years for decades to come”.
Donald Trump has issued a fresh ultimatum to Vladimir Putin today in a bid to bring the Ukraine war to a close.
The new US President, in a direct warning to his Russian counterpart, said if a deal couldn’t be reached over the “ridiculous” invasion of Ukraine, he would be left with “no choice” but to slap Russia with a series of “taxes, tariffs and sanctions”.
Writing on his social media platform Truth Social, Trump said: “I’m not looking to hurt Russia. I love the Russian people, and always had a very good relationship with President Putin – and this despite the Radical left’s Russia, Russia, Russia HOAX.
“We must never forget that Russia helped us win the Second World War, losing almost 60,000,000 lives in the process.
Donald Trump has issued a fresh ultimatum to Vladimir Putin over the Ukraine war
REUTERS
“All of that being said, I’m going to do Russia – whose economy is failing – and president Putin, a very big favour.
“Settle now, and STOP this ridiculous war! IT’S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE.
“If we don’t make a ‘deal’, and soon, I have no other choice but to put high levels of taxes, tariffs, and sanctions on anything being sold by Russia to the United States, and various other participating countries.
“Let’s get this war, which never would have started if I were President, over with!
LATEST ON DONALD TRUMP AND VLADIMIR PUTIN:
‘Settle now, and STOP this ridiculous war! IT’S ONLY GOING TO GET WORSE,’ Trump warned
REUTERS
“We can do it the easy way, or the hard way – and the easy way is always better.
“It’s time to ‘MAKE A DEAL’. NO MORE LIVES SHOULD BE LOST!!!”
In response to the President-elect’s ultimatum, Russia’s deputy envoy to the United Nations Dmitry Polyanskiy said it was “not merely a question of ending the war”, rather “the question of addressing root causes of the Ukrainian crisis”.
In a swipe at Barack Obama, he added: “So we have to see what does the ‘deal’ mean in President Trump’s understanding.
“He is not responsible for what the US has been doing in Ukraine since 2014, making it ‘anti-Russia’ and preparing for the war with us, but it is in his power now to stop this malicious policy.”
In the run-up to his historic return to the White House, Trump had pledged to bring the war to a swift end
REUTERS
In the run-up to his historic return to the White House, Trump had pledged to bring the war to a swift end – in 2023, he told CNN: “If I’m president, I will have that war settled in one day… 24 hours.”
And on the campaign trail, he had suggested he could bring about peace in the interim period between winning re-election and officially returning to office.
“That is a war that’s dying to be settled. I will get it settled before I even become President.
“If I win, when I’m President-elect, and what I’ll do is I’ll speak to one, I’ll speak to the other, I’ll get them together,” he vowed in a debate with Kamala Harris.
Politics
Defence Manufacturers On Brink Of Administration While Waiting For Strategic Defence Review
4 min read
Small to medium sized defence manufacturers are close to falling into administration, as they wait for the publication of the Strategic Defence Review (SDR).
Defence companies had expected the government’s landmark review into the UK’s preparedness for war to be published around Easter. However, industry figures now fear the SDR will be published towards the end of the year, The Telegraph recently reported.
While the government denies there is a moratorium on procurement spend, defence manufacturers understand there to be a ‘de-facto’ freeze on the limits of capital and resource department spending until the next spending review. They believe the government is reluctant to sign off on new procurement expenditure because it wants to include announcements in its SDR.
Brad Hayward, head of commercial for a UK micro-SME defence manufacturer and chair of the ADS Defence UK SME Committee, said that the UK SME community has experienced “a highly challenging 12 months”, where the pipeline of UK defence procurement opportunities has “significantly reduced in scope and consistency”.
He added “continued pauses” brought on by events such as the general election, Autumn Budget and Strategic Defence Review have created a “continual delay in demand signals to industry”.
This has resulted in “an alarming number of organisations downsizing” in the UK, with companies either “removing themselves from the defence sector” or “liquidating entirely”.
Samira Braund, defence director of trade body ADS Group, said that a few small to medium sized defence manufacturers could “very likely” be facing administration due to cash flow issues caused by paused contracts.
Of the more than 900 British defence equipment manufacturers represented by ADS, “upwards of 30” have come to the body seeking support. Braund added that some SMEs have been awarded contracts, but these have been “put on hold” while the government waits to deliver its SDR.
“These concerns have been raised up to senior officials within the Ministry of Defence, noting a lot of our SMEs’ cash flow challenges could be three to six months, and therefore they are looking to potentially diversify or exit the market.
“That goes against all of the work that the new government and officials are trying to put in place in the SDR in creating long term demand signals.”
One defence manufacturer employing between 50 and 100 staff said that government’s decision to freeze procurement for two months last year saw “less opportunity for work”. They also claimed they are “not allowed to invoice” the Ministry of Defence for contract work immediately, but have to wait until they are told to, which can take up to four months.
“They might have 30 day payment terms, but it’s from the point we’ve been allowed to invoice,” they said. “That really hurts us badly.”
The SME added that it is resorting to “seeking finance in terms of business loans” to help the company grow, but that if they were paid on time, they would be able to use their cash reserves.
“If they don’t pay us on time, we may cease to exist. People have ceased to exist not because they’re not profitable, but rather because they’re not paid on time.”
Larger defence manufacturers have also been affected by the government’s delayed publication of its SDR, with some companies struggling to recruit staff.
Braund said that the lack of a “continuous cycle” of procurement means “highly talented people” are lost from the defence sector. “We already have at least 10,000 vacancies across our sectors, and this just exacerbates the problem,” she said.
A Ministry of Defence spokesperson said: “We do not recognise these claims. We’re continuing to invest in British businesses, including through recent contracts such as enhanced support Navy ship deployments. The timeline of the Strategic Defence Review does not prevent investment and we continue to engage closely with industry partners, including the SME community, as we develop the new Defence Industrial Strategy.
“We have a cast-iron commitment to increasing defence spending to 2.5 per cent of GDP.”
PoliticsHome Newsletters
PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe
Politics
Scottish Labour MP Warns Oil Refinery Closure Under Starmer Risks Thatcher-Era Scale Devastation
Grangemouth petrochemical plant in Scotland is set to close this summer (Alamy)
4 min read
A Scottish Labour MP has compared the closure of Scotland’s only oil refinery to the “social devastation” caused by the closure of coal mines across the United Kingdom under Margaret Thatcher in the 1980s.
Brian Leishman, Labour MP for Alloa and Grangemouth, has been critical of the current government’s direction under Keir Starmer. He has recently urged ministers to step in and save Scotland’s sole oil refinery, which is expected to close by the summer at a cost of 400 jobs.
Petroineos, a joint venture between Ineos and PetroChina, has said the decision to discontinue Grangemouth was because of increased competition from industrial sites in Africa, Asia and the Middle East.
Leishman told PoliticsHome he believed the Government had not done enough to save an integral pillar of “national infrastructure”, which in turn would make the UK more reliant on hostile nations for oil and gas.
“The closing of the refinery is not just a constituency issue for Alloa and Grangemouth, it’s a Scotland-wide issue,” he said.
“This is a vital key piece of national infrastructure. The problem we’ve got as well is, it is not only in the hands of one foreign power, in the Chinese Communist Party, but also in the hands of a multi-billionaire private capital owner.
“It will decimate my community. There will be massive implications and knock-on effects for local businesses. The easy comparison is what happened to the mining communities; we have an unjust transition and it is a disaster for workers.”
The refinery was opened by BP in 1924 and is the United Kingdom’s oldest refinery. Petroineos claimed it had invested more than £900 million since 2011 and had recorded losses of £594 million over the last 14 years.
The Government, however, has previously said Petroineos “made it clear” to ministers that the site has no commercial future. Governments in Westminster and Holyrood have also promised to upskill the local workforce ahead of redundancies.
The Scottish Labour MP did not blame the UK Government’s mission of achieving Net Zero on the expected closure of Grangemouth. He said the UK was not cutting carbon emissions quickly enough, as the Government is obligated by law to reduce greenhouse gases by at least 100 per cent by 2050.
However, he also said the Government had not taken an environmental assessment and added that he believed removing the refinery would do nothing to reduce global emissions.
“There’s been no environmental impact assessment carried out by the UK government,” he said. “We’re basically going to be shifting emissions, because we’re going to have ARA (Amsterdam, Rotterdam, Antwerp) as European Cash and Carry in Mainland Europe, to provide oil to Scotland.”
He urged the Government to find his constituents suitable work in the future.
“The whole point of a transition is that it’s not a turn off the taps and that is it. That means let’s invest in Grangemouth.
“What we’ve got to do, whatever pace it happens, at the essential thing we’ve got to do is we’ve got to take workers… and communities along for that ride,” he added.
Ministers have said the decision will not impact Scotland’s energy security, as Grangemouth imported more than 90 per cent of its crude oil in 2023.
Many Scottish MPs are already concerned they may not win their seats at the next election following unpopular decisions by Starmer’s government. Polling shows Anas Sarwar’s Scottish Labour has struggled to win support ahead of 2026 Holyrood election, with the SNP on track to win the next election by 10 percentage points.
“We’ve got central Scotland, but we’re in serious danger of giving it away. And I think that’s going to have a serious impact on Holyrood, but also… on future Westminster elections,” he said.
“Right-wing populism is seducing people, that’s why it’s so important as a Government we do improve living standards for people so we can show we have a credible left-wing solution to the societal problems which are really impacting the problem.
“When Reform moved to the right, they bring the Tories with them. We cannot as a Labour Party in government especially be dragged to the right. We’ve got to be bold and stick to our principles and our ethos as a party and say the left provide the solutions for the societal problems of inequality we have.”
A Department for Energy Security and Net Zero spokesperson said: “We took immediate action following Petroineos’ confirmation on the closure of Grangemouth.
“Before July, there was no overall plan for the future of the Grangemouth refinery. Within weeks, we worked with the Scottish Government to put together an unprecedented £100m package to support the community and invest in the local workforce, along with tailored support to help those affected find good, alternative jobs.
“We are also jointly funding Project Willow with £1.5m, which is urgently engaging with trade unions and developing options for a sustainable industrial future at the site.”
PoliticsHome Newsletters
PoliticsHome provides the most comprehensive coverage of UK politics anywhere on the web, offering high quality original reporting and analysis: Subscribe
Politics
Lee Anderson demands legal action against Prevent bosses over Axel Rudakubana failings: ‘Morons!’
Reform UK MP Lee Anderson has called for legal action against bosses of the government’s Prevent programme, branding them “morons” over their handling of Southport child-killer Axel Rudakubana.
Speaking on GB News, Anderson demanded that Prevent officials be “sacked, held to account, their pensions took off them and put in the dock and charged.”
“They are responsible. They are set up to prevent this sort of nonsense,” the MP said, following revelations that Rudakubana had been referred to the counter-terrorism programme three times before the attack.
Rudakubana was first referred to Prevent at age 13 in 2019 over concerns about his interest in US school massacres, which he researched using school computers.
Lee Anderson erupted over Prevent’s failings
GB NEWS / MERSEYSIDE POLICE
Two additional referrals followed in 2021 after he viewed material about Libya and past terrorist attacks, including those in London in 2017.
The material he accessed consisted mainly of news articles, and officials found no evidence he was viewing extremist content at the time of assessment.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
Lee Anderson spoke to Martin Daubney
GB NEWS
After one referral, it was recommended he be referred to other services, though it remains unclear if this occurred.
Despite extensive searches, police found no evidence of terrorist motivation for the Southport attack.
An emergency review following the stabbings found that Prevent’s policies, covering criteria for accepting individuals for de-radicalisation work, were correctly followed.
Sources told media there remains a “grey area” in cases where young people may pose a risk of violence without showing signs of terrorist ideology.
Axel Rudakubana pleaded guilty to murdering three young girls in the Southport knife attack in July 2024PA
“There is a gap for those who are volatile, who need management, who may be dangerous. There is nothing for them,” one source said.
Rudakubana, 18, pleaded guilty at Liverpool Crown Court on Monday to murdering Alice da Silva Aguiar, nine, Bebe King, six, and Elsie Dot Stancombe, seven at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in Southport last July.
He also admitted to 10 counts of attempted murder and possession of a bladed article.
Additional charges he pleaded guilty to included producing ricin and possessing an al-Qaeda training manual, described as information useful for terrorism purposes.
The Crown Prosecution Service called him “a young man with a sickening and sustained interest in death and violence.”
Anderson told GB News that he had questioned the Home Secretary about 162 people referred to Prevent last year over suspected interest in school massacres.
“I asked her how many of the 162 are still in detention. Want to know the answer? She couldn’t give me one. I will tell you what the answer is, it’s zero,” he said.
The MP also referenced the killing of Sir David Amess, noting that his killer had also been referred to Prevent before the attack.
Politics
Joe Biden a ‘solitary figure’ as historian delivers withering verdict on ‘sad presidency with a sad end’
US historian Victor Davis Hanson has described Joe Biden’s departure from the presidency as that of a “solitary figure” with no defenders remaining, even within his own party.
Speaking to GBN America, Hanson painted a stark picture of Biden’s final moments in office, contrasting his exit with that of his successor Donald Trump.
“Biden has no base, no defenders, period. Not even in his own party,” Hanson said in his assessment of the former president’s departure.
The historian’s comments came as Biden, 82, handed over power to Trump at this week’s inauguration ceremony.
Joe Biden ended his presidency on Monday following Trump’s inaugration
Reuters
At Andrews Air Force Base, Biden delivered a defiant farewell speech following the inauguration ceremony.
In his final address before handing power to the Republicans, supporters hailed cheers of “thank you Joe” to Biden, before he and his wife Jill departed via their Nighthawk 46 helicopter.
Hanson highlighted Biden’s controversial timing of pardons, which occurred during Trump’s inaugural address.
“He waited until Trump was actually giving his address, right before he was going to be sworn in,” Hanson told GBN America.
As one of Biden’s final acts in office, he sought to protect those against “unjustified… politically motivated prosecutions”REUTERS
The historian noted this was only the second time in US history that preemptive pardons were issued for crimes not yet charged.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:
“We’ve only done this once in our history, given a preemptive pardon for crimes not noticed or never charged. We only did that with Gerald Ford’s pardon of Richard Nixon,” he said.
According to Hanson, this timing inadvertently validated Trump’s predictions about Biden’s final moments in office.
The move also left Biden’s critics “totally embarrassed, shocked” and exposed what Hanson called their hypocrisy regarding presidential pardons.
At Andrews Air Force Base, Biden delivered a defiant farewell speech following the inauguration ceremony.
Hanson told GBN America that Biden had a ‘sad presidency with a sad end’
GBNA
Outgoing president Joe Biden told supporters “we all have more to do” in his address to staff and supporters.
The former president was observed making the sign of the cross both during his farewell speech and at the inauguration itself, drawing laughter from his audience.
“My dad taught me the measure of a person is how quickly they get up when they get knocked down – and that’s what we have to do right now,” Biden told those assembled.
US historian Victor Davis Hanson has described Joe Biden’s departure from the presidency as that of a “solitary figure” with no defenders remaining, even within his own party.
Speaking to GBN America, Hanson painted a stark picture of Biden’s final moments in office, contrasting his exit with that of his successor Donald Trump.
Politics
SAS veteran blasts ‘imbecilic’ Rachel Reeves as Labour target war heroes with inheritance tax raid: ‘I am absolutely fuming!’
An SAS veteran has hit out at Labour’s decision to hit grieving families of military workers with inheritance tax from April 2027.
The money given to families of deceased Armed Forces members, called death in service payments, may be subject to a hefty cut after Labour MPs voted in favour of a raid.
The lump sum of money will be subject to death duties from 2027 for children or partners of servicemen and women who are not married.
Death in service payments are normally a one-off figure issued to named beneficiaries of a military worker who dies while on duty.
Matthew Hellyer erupted into a furious rant on GB News
GB NEWS
Speaking on GB News, Matthew Hellyer erupted into a furious rant as he spoke to Martin Daubney.
“I am absolutely fuming. As a grieving father, my son died 18 months ago”, he said.
LATEST DEVELOPMENTS
Rachel Reeves backed the controversial tax
PA
“I know the pain that these people are going through now. This imbecilic Government are now taxing the very people that have given us our freedom.
“They are ruining us. This applies to the children and widows of soldiers that have been killed on the battlefield.
“They get a final payment. They get the money, a death in service payment. This has always been seen as tax free. Something to lift the spirits and give the soldiers’ families something to look forward to because they don’t have a husband or wife to support them anymore.
“They need this money more than anything. The pain they are going through is immense.
Hellyer joined Martin Daubney on GB News
GB NEWS
“Keir Starmer and Rachel Reeves have no compassion. They’re killing our pensioners, ridiculing our pensioners and persecuting our soldiers.
“Where does it end?”
He added: “This Government is waging war on our military. We have an attorney general that supported the IRA and is refusing to stand down.
“They are after our military, lock stock and two smoking barrels. They’re never giving up. It’s relentless and we’re getting beaten. We have to stand up for our rights.”
The payments will now go into probate if not left to a spouse or civil partner, potentially reducing the compensation by up to 40 per cent in inheritance tax.
Major General Neil Marshall, chief executive of the Forces Pension Society, has written to HMRC urging them to reverse the decision.
In his letter, he warned: “Given the high-risk nature of military service… a policy that discriminates against those who are not married or in a civil partnership poses a serious threat to morale, team cohesion and ultimately operational effectiveness.”
The Treasury has confirmed existing exemptions will continue for active service deaths.
“If a member of the Armed Forces dies from a wound inflicted, accident occurring or disease contracted on active service, they will be exempt,” a Treasury spokesman said.
Military personnel cannot avoid this tax through trusts, as the payments are part of the Armed Forces pension scheme.
Elon Musk has poured cold water on Donald Trump‘s half-a-trillion-dollar Artificial Intelligence initiative – marking a potential first rift between the pair since Trump took office.
The President declared on Tuesday that several tech giants including Oracle, MGX and OpenAI would be pledging $500billion (£406billion) to fund the construction of data centres in the US over his four-year term.
He said that the project, called Stargate, would be “the largest AI infrastructure project by far in history”, adding: “It’s big money and high-quality people.”
Trump said the mega funding drive would be “a resounding declaration of confidence in America’s potential”, but now, tech tycoon Musk – himself a major player in AI – has warned that the investment may not be all it seems.
Elon Musk has poured cold water on Donald Trump’s half-a-trillion-dollar Artificial Intelligence initiative Stargate
REUTERS
An OpenAI press release had talked up its funding for Stargate, including an initial investment of $100billion.
But Musk prodded: “They don’t actually have the money.”
And in a swipe at Japanese partner investors SoftBank, he said he “has it on good authority” that the firm “has well under $10B secured”.
Musk has endured a long-standing feud with Sam Altman, with whom he jointly founded OpenAI, the firm behind Artificial Intelligence behemoth ChatGPT.
LATEST ON DONALD TRUMP‘S SECOND TERM:
Trump has said the mega funding drive would be ‘a resounding declaration of confidence in America’s potential’
REUTERS
Musk, who resigned from OpenAI in 2018, has since labelled his former colleague Altman “Swindly Sam”.
Meanwhile, Altman has called Musk a “bully” in response.
In the face of the X owner’s condemnation, construction on one of Stargate data centres has already begun in Texas, according to Oracle Chairman Larry Ellison, who launched the project in the White House to alongside Trump, Altman and SoftBank CEO Masayoshi Son.
“We wouldn’t be able to do this without you, Mr President,” Altman said.
Though Musk and Trump appear to be at loggerheads over AI, the Tesla owner has been vocal in his support for the President on cracking down on DEI
REUTERS
Though Musk and Trump appear to be at loggerheads over AI, the Tesla owner has been vocal in his support for the President on cracking down on Diversity, Equity and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives.
Reacting to the news that Trump had signed an executive order repealing Lyndon Johnson’s establishment of affirmative action, Musk said simply: “Massive”.
Musk, who now leads the new administration’s drive to cut costs across the federal government, took a swipe at DEI initiatives on social media in a reply to the news of Coast Guard chief Linda Fagan’s termination.
“Undermining the US military and border security to spend money on racist/sexist DEI nonsense is no longer acceptable,” Musk said.
Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), a leader in the effort to lift the limit on a state and local tax deduction some key House Republicans are demanding, said at a POLITICO Playbook event on Wednesday morning that he will be meeting with President Donald Trump on Wednesday.
New York, New Jersey and California Republicans made a pilgrimage to Mar-a-Lago recently to reiterate their demands to lift the so-called SALT cap, which limits the deduction to $10,000, in negotiations over a large tax bill. The lawmakers say the cap is harming constituents in their politically competitive, high-tax districts.
Their votes will be crucial to passing a major tax bill GOP lawmakers are assembling.
20 Best Walmart Menswear Sales This Week
Trump Ushering In Next Phase of 'Crypto Revolution': Wood
Samsung Says Its Galaxy S25 Is ‘Qi2 Ready.’ Here’s What That Really Means
-
Fashion8 years agoThese ’90s fashion trends are making a comeback in 2025
-
Entertainment8 years agoThe Season 9 ‘ Game of Thrones’ is here.
-
Fashion8 years ago9 spring/summer 2025 fashion trends to know for next season
-
Entertainment8 years agoThe old and New Edition cast comes together to perform You’re Not My Kind of Girl.
-
Sports8 years agoEthical Hacker: “I’ll Show You Why Google Has Just Shut Down Their Quantum Chip”
-
Business8 years ago
Uber and Lyft are finally available in all of New York State
-
Entertainment8 years ago
Disney’s live-action Aladdin finally finds its stars
-
Sports8 years ago
Steph Curry finally got the contract he deserves from the Warriors
-
Entertainment8 years ago
Mod turns ‘Counter-Strike’ into a ‘Tekken’ clone with fighting chickens
-
Fashion8 years ago
Your comprehensive guide to this fall’s biggest trends
You must be logged in to post a comment Login