Connect with us

Business

Retail crime ‘queenpin’ Michelle Mack to pay restitution to Ulta

Published

on

The California mom who pleaded guilty to running an organized retail crime ring that stole millions of dollars in beauty products from Ulta Beauty and Sephora to resell on Amazon will now have to pay those retailers back as part of her sentence.

Michelle Mack, who began her five-year prison sentence on Jan. 9 following her arrest outside of San Diego in December 2023, was ordered to pay $3 million in restitution to Ulta, Sephora and a number of other retailers after striking a plea deal with prosecutors last year. 

As part of the deal, Mack, 54, forfeited her 4,500-square-foot mansion in Bonsall, California, which was sold in December for $2.35 million, property records show

Any funds left from the sale, after bank debts were satisfied, will go toward restitution, while Mack and her husband Kenneth Mack, 60, will pay back the remainder “over time,” California Attorney General Rob Bonta’s office said. 

Advertisement

It’s not clear if Mack had a mortgage on the property, but she originally purchased it for $2.29 million in 2021, according to property records.

It’s also not clear how the restitution will be divvied up among Mack’s victims. The crime ring she admitted to running primarily targeted Ulta stores, but it stole from other retailers, including Sephora.

When compared with the net income that retailers like Ulta bring in annually, the restitution is likely a drop in the bucket — but it would still be a small windfall. Ulta declined to comment on the restitution, including how it would use the funds or account for them in financial statements. The company did say it was proud to have partnered with law enforcement officials on the investigation and was grateful for their efforts. 

“This case demonstrates that through close partnerships between retailers, law enforcement and prosecutors, as well as legislative support, we can make a meaningful impact on organized retail crime and hold the criminals perpetuating this problem accountable,” Dan Petrousek, senior vice president of loss prevention at Ulta Beauty, said in a statement. 

Advertisement

Sephora didn’t return a request for comment. 

David Johnston, vice president of asset protection and retail operations at the National Retail Federation, said restitution is common for retailers, victimized by theft, but the amounts only recently started reaching the millions.

“The level of theft … has not been as substantial and as commonplace as we’ve seen over the last, you know, four years or so,” said Johnston. “This is going to be what we would expect to see when we start to get these organized retail crime groups through the judicial process. It is a substantial amount of loss, a complex organization, which involves a number of individuals, and then sentencing and restitution that meet the crime.” 

He cautioned that restitution rarely makes up for a retailers’ lost income in full, and it can take years for a defendant to pay back the fines entirely.

Advertisement

“Restitution is part of the judicial process, but it does not guarantee that the victim will receive all or any funds,” said Johnston. “It’s dependent upon the ability to obtain that restitution from the offender and the process in which that restitution is in fact paid and shared across multiple victims.” 

Last year, Bonta filed a slew of felony charges against Mack and her husband, alleging they ran what his office called a sprawling retail crime ring that led to an estimated $8 million in stolen beauty products, CNBC previously reported. The operation spanned at least a dozen states, CNBC reported.

Mack wasn’t accused of stealing the products herself. Instead, police said she recruited a crew of young women to take the items so she could resell the products on her Amazon storefront for a fraction of their retail price. 

The investigation, led by the California Highway Patrol, gained national attention and revealed the sophisticated nature behind some retail crime rings and how bad actors can use online marketplaces to sell stolen products

Advertisement

Last summer, Mack was sentenced to five years and four months in state prison, but was given a delayed sentence that began this month. Mack’s husband, Kenneth, was also sentenced in connection with the case, so the judge agreed to postpone her sentence so she could care for their children while Kenneth was incarcerated. 

Additional reporting by Scott Zamost and Courtney Reagan

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

CryptoCurrency

Silk Road’s Ross Ulbricht: 'Why Defend A Murderer?'

Published

on

Silk Road’s Ross Ulbricht: 'Why Defend A Murderer?'

Ross Ulbricht, sentenced to life in prison without the possibility of parole for creating the darknet market Silk Road, is free.

Ulbricht is a freedom fighter to some, and a dangerous criminal to others. The former know Ulbricht as described in Forbes, “a principled libertarian and cypherpunk in the same vein as WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange and Bitcoin creator Satoshi Nakamoto”.

Ulbricht had a theory: that violent drug cartels would have no chance sustaining themselves in a free market environment where the state did not control the use of substances, as non-violent operations would simply outperform the violent ones based on demand.

Most who believe the latter, however, often base their opinion on claims that Ulbricht allegedly attempted to hire a hitman on a former Silk Road administrator, who stood accused of embezzling bitcoin from the site. While Ulbricht’s supporters celebrate, critics are asking: why would an online community so vehemently defend an attempted murderer?

Advertisement

The controversies and outright corruption surrounding Ulbricht’s prosecution should therefore not be forgotten.

The Charges Against Ulbricht

On February 5th 2015, a jury in the Southern District of New York found Ulbricht guilty of exclusively non-violent crimes, including several charges of narcotics distribution, computer hacking, conspiracy to run a criminal enterprise, and conspiracy to commit money laundering.

The judge sentenced Ulbricht to two life sentences plus forty years without the possibility of parole – almost twice the sentence of the violent Sinaloa cartel leader Joaquín “El Chapo” Guzmán.

The alleged murder for hire charges arose out of a different case, filed in May 2013 in Maryland. The indictment alleged that, based on chat logs obtained from the Silk Road site, Ulbricht attempted to murder Curtis Green for stealing bitcoin from the project.

Advertisement

As the chat logs read according to the indictment, Dread Pirate Roberts (DPR), the pseudonym attributed to Ulbricht, wrote to another Silk Road user, whom he believed to be a drug kingpin capable of ordering a hitman:

“I’d like to beat him up, [sic] then forced to send the bitcoins he stole back. [sic] like sit him down at his computer and make him do it.”

A day later, the indictment states, DPR allegedly changed his mind, writing: “Can you change the order to execute rather than torture?”

According to the indictment, DPR stated that Green “was on the inside for a while, and now that he’s been arrested, I’m afraid he’ll give up info,” allegedly adding that he had “never killed a man before, but this is the right move in this case.”

Advertisement

A few days later, $40,000 were wired into the hitman’s account, and DPR asked for “proof of death” via video or pictures to send the rest of the payment.

On February 21st 2013, the kingpin informed DPR that Green was dead – “they killed him this weekend,” he wrote, telling him that he had died of asphyxiation, and that the body was completely destroyed to eliminate evidence.

Except the kingpin wasn’t a kingpin. It was DEA Agent Carl Force who, as it would later turn out, liked to engage in a little criminal enterprise himself when granted the opportunity.

A Real Theft And A Fake Murder

During the course of the investigation, Green had been cooperating with law enforcement, giving DEA Agent Carl Force and Secret Service Agent Shaun Bridges access to the Silk Road site.

Advertisement

During one of law enforcement’s sessions on Silk Road, a series of “sizeable thefts” occurred on the site, which would later be traced back to Bridges, who plead guilty to stealing $350,000 in bitcoin at the time of the theft, or $800,000 at the time of his guilty plea.

The account in question, operated by Bridges and in consultation with Force, had received “no less than 20,000 bitcoin”, according to the complaint. Force, posing as the drug kingpin “Nob”, then orchestrated the fake hit and, together with Bridges, faked Green’s death.

Force went on to create the fake identity “Death from Above” to extort $250,000 from DPR, stating: “I know that you had something to do with [Green’s] disappearance and death. Just wanted to let you know that I’m coming for you. […] You are a dead man. Don’t think you can elude me.”

Bridges was sentenced to 24 months in prison to be served consecutively to a 71-month sentence he received for a similar crime in 2015, while Force was sentenced to 78 months in prison. Information on the corrupt agents was never made available to be used in Ulbricht’s defense.

Advertisement

Who Is Dread Pirate Roberts

Dread Pirate Roberts, the pseudonym attributed to Ulbricht, is taken from the 1973 novel “The Princess Bride” by William Goldman, depicting an identity that is assumed by multiple characters. The identity Dread Pirate Roberts, as written by Goldman, is shared between pirates to intimidate opponents, and passed on in secret.

In the course of the public proceedings of the case, evidence mounted that Silk Road’s DPR was not solely operated by Ulbricht. In a conversation with former friend Richard Bates, who helped Ulbricht set up the Silk Road site, Ulbricht responded with “glad that’s not my problem anymore” when made aware of news coverage concerning the site.

During the trial, prosecutors attempted to stop the defense from questioning another law enforcement officer, special agent Jared Der-Yeghiayan of the Department of Homeland Security, who believed that DPR was actually Mark Kapeles – the former Mt. Gox CEO, who was later convicted for falsifying Mt. Gox records and inflating the exchange’s supply by tens of millions.

Der-Yeghiayan had referred to an exclusive interview with DPR in Forbes, in which the pseudonymous Silk Road operator had stated that “he hadn’t actually created the Silk Road, but instead had befriended its creator and later acquired the site from him.”

Advertisement

According to Der-Yeghiayan, DPR’s writing sounded very much like that of his suspect, Mark Kapeles – and Der-Yeghiayan is not the only one alleging that DPR sounded like someone else. As former Dark Wallet developer Amir Taaki stated:

“Years ago, when I messaged the Silk Road, I had a conversation with the DPR – a very personal conversation where he was [talking] about how one day he hopes to be on the outside struggling for freedom together. You know, not having to hide his identity. One year [or] two years later when I messaged the guy — I’m pretty certain it was not the same guy. The tone was completely different. He had no recollection of the events that happened before, and his attitude to me was in stark contrast to the exuberant and wordy DPR of the early days.”

This argument was further backed by a pseudonymous Silk Road vendor, who stated that “there were ‘at least two other people—if not three’—who were administering Silk Road.” Der-Yeghiayan corroborates this belief in an email ten days before Ulbricht’s arrest, stating that “we contributed to the other two admins getting away.”

Silk Road employee Andrew Jones, who had established a ‘secret handshake’ with Ulbricht in 2012 to confirm his identity, did not believe that the late DPR was Ulbricht, either.

Advertisement

According to court documents, Jones would ask DPR for a book recommendation, to which the correct answer would be “anything by Rothbard” – an answer which DPR did not provide when asked a year later.

To add intellectual insult to operational injury, someone had logged in to DPR’s account six weeks after Ulbricht’s arrest, who was in federal custody at the time – which may have been the corrupt agents, who had administrative access to the site, or another DPR all together.

As stated by Green himself: “and to everybody that says ‘were there multiple DPRs’, absolutely there was – I was DPR once. So if I was, who else was?”

Regarding the murder-for-hire charges, Green stated that he did not believe Ulbricht would have ordered a hit on him. As Green stated in 2017:

Advertisement

“Ross Ulbricht got a raw deal. There is so much more on the Silk Road story than people know, and I can’t yet talk about it. I don’t believe Ross is dangerous or that it’s in his character to order a hit on anyone. He should never have gotten that horrible sentence.”

To cut to the chase: yes, Ross Ulbricht operated Silk Road. No, Ross Ulbricht was likely not the only person with access to the DPR account. Ross Ulbricht was never convicted of the murder-for-hire charges. The case was dismissed in 2018 with prejudice, meaning that it could never be filed again.

For all we know, we are all Dread Pirate Roberts.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

CryptoCurrency

TRON H2 2024: Dominating Stablecoin Ecosystem While Pioneering New Horizons

Published

on

TRON H2 2024: Dominating Stablecoin Ecosystem While Pioneering New Horizons

The second half of 2024 was a milestone period for the TRON network. It achieved record-breaking performance across key metrics, saw $TRX reach all-time highs, and experienced a surge in ecosystem activity driven by memecoin activity. Let’s break it all down.

Key Highlights

  • TRON led in the Price-to-Revenue ratio, maintaining a top-three position throughout the period.

  • Fundamental blockchain metrics demonstrated TRON’s strength and competitiveness.

  • A successful “vampire attack” on Solana attracted significant attention to the TRON ecosystem.

$TRX Reaches a New All-Time High

The native token of the TRON blockchain demonstrated significant growth in early December, setting a new all-time high at $0.416. As of early 2025, the token’s price is trading at $0.225.

At this price level, 94% of wallets holding $TRX are in profit.

Historically, $TRX has shown consistent upward price momentum. The token’s value generally increases over time, with major price drops occurring only after exponential growth cycles, which typically happen every four years. Importantly, the price has never returned to the previous lows of earlier cycles.

Advertisement

This price behavior sets $TRX apart from many other large-cap altcoins, as holders of $TRX tend to remain in profit for a significant portion of their holding period.

TRON Leads Across Plenty of Fundamental Metrics

The driving force behind TRON’s price behavior lies in its blockchain metrics. Among these, the price-to-revenue ratio stands out as a crucial indicator for fundamental analysis.

Notably, at the start of the second half of the year, before the native token’s price surge, TRON led the market with the lowest price-to-revenue ratio of 26.7. (The lower the ratio, the higher the project’s revenue relative to its market capitalization.) While such a ratio is fairly common in the technology sector of the stock market, it is considered exceptional in the cryptocurrency market.

After the exponential price growth, the ratio has shifted, but TRON still remains among the leaders in this metric.

Advertisement

More than that, TRON has emerged as the most cost-efficient L1 blockchain in 2024, spending just $0.85 for every $1 generated in fee revenue. This stands in contrast to Aptos, which spent over 300 times more on incentives than it earned in fees. Bitcoin, with its Proof-of-Work model, spent $80B on miner incentives while generating $6.6B in transaction fees.

Additionally, in terms of absolute revenue, TRON ranks second after Ethereum. Ethereum, TRON, and Solana are the undisputed leaders in revenue generation among blockchains, accounting for over 95% of the total revenue generated by projects in this category.

The TRON network has solidified its leadership in the number of addresses interacting with stablecoins. TRON is the most popular network for users transferring stablecoins between centralized exchanges. This success can be attributed to several factors:

  • High reliability: The network is proven both over time and by the volume of assets it handles.

  • Cost-efficiency: TRON provides one of the most cost-efficient solutions for stablecoin transactions, making it an attractive option for users across various demographics.

  • Broad support: The network is supported by nearly all centralized exchanges.

  • Unique resource mechanism: TRON’s unique dPOS model, coupled with its Energy and Bandwidth resource system, offers cost savings and efficiency. This design is highly appealing for both individual users and payments platforms.

  • Active Network Participation: TRON dPOS Staking & Voting system keep retail & investors involved in the Network from both technological and investment reasons. 

In terms of stablecoin transfers, TRON ranks third, with a total of 3 trillion USDT in transfers for the second half of 2024—just slightly behind Ethereum and Solana.

Advertisement

In the second half of 2024, 5 billion USDT were minted and burned on the TRON network, resulting in a stablecoin volume that remained relatively unchanged despite minor fluctuations.

Returning to the overall metrics, TRON ranks among the top three in terms of active addresses for the second half of 2024.

Additionally, during this period, TRON ranks among the top three blockchains in terms of transaction volume.

As for the Total Value Locked (TVL) metric, in the second half of 2024, TRON lost some ground to BSC and the rapidly growing Bitcoin ecosystem, driven by restaking protocols. However, it still remains in the top five.

Advertisement

Thus, TRON is a leader among blockchains across several key metrics, thanks to its strong product-market fit in the stablecoin segment.

However, there was one highly popular market segment where TRON did not achieve significant success in the past half-year: the memecoin sector. Well, in the second half of 2024, Justin Sun and his team decided to make up for lost ground and managed to pleasantly surprise the market.

The Memecoin Summer on TRON

By mid-2024, it became clear that pump.fun on the Solana blockchain — a platform where anyone could launch their own token in just a few clicks and almost for free — was the most prominent and successful project of the cycle. It had already generated massive revenue and attracted significant attention. As a result, on August 13, a similar platform called SunPump was launched on the TRON network. Its name was a nod to its origin, and it was built on the AMM protocol SunSwap, with its smart contracts actively powering the platform. Despite initial skepticism, SunPump quickly proved to be serious competition for pump.fun, especially in its first month of operation.

In fact, the meme tokens launched in the early days on SunPump surpassed those previously launched on pump.fun.

Advertisement

Within a month, the pace of token launches on the platform and their average market performance naturally stabilized, reflecting a shift toward a more sustainable growth phase.

This trend is not uncommon in the crypto industry, where the “first-mover” effect often gives established platforms an initial edge. However, this also provides an opportunity for new platforms, like TRON’s SunPump, to innovate further and differentiate themselves from older, more familiar platforms as they continue to evolve.

Illicit Activity Mitigation

In August 2024, TRON, Tether and TRM announced the establishment of The T3 Financial Crime Unit (T3 FCU) – a сollaboration aimed at reducing illicit activity in the blockchain industry. In just six months, they managed to freeze over $100 million in criminal assets globally, marking a significant milestone in its fight against cryptocurrency-related financial crime. The TRON network, in particular, experienced the most significant decline in illicit activity, with volume dropping by $6 billion and the proportion of such activity nearly halving. The unit has worked closely with law enforcement agencies worldwide to disrupt criminal networks involved in money laundering, investment fraud, blackmail, terrorism financing, and other serious financial crimes.

New Year, New Challenges for the Ecosystem

One promising market narrative TRON has only begun to explore is the integration of AI technologies. With the innovative track record of Justin Sun and his team, 2025 promises to be a transformative year for TRON in this space. Building on their success with fair launch platforms for meme tokens, we are confident they will introduce groundbreaking applications or creatively adapt existing solutions to position TRON as a leader in the AI-crypto synergy.

Advertisement

Moreover, we are already seeing the first signs from TRON DAOitself. On January 7, the official Twitter (X) account of TRON DAO posted a poll asking users which use cases they find most interesting for AI technologies within the crypto industry.

Just a few days later, they reposted a post from the account @JustinMoonAI – a community project featuring an English-speaking AI agent who hosts a 24/7 livestream, interacting with visitors on the website. The agent’s name and some aspects of their appearance clearly reference the founder of the TRON blockchain.

Additionally, on January 10, the TRON blockchain became available as an interaction network in the EternalAI protocol, a multi-chain platform for launching tokenized AI agents.

Output

The TRON network is one of the earliest blockchain technologies launched by human civilization. Over its more than 6 years of existence, it has established itself as a reliable decentralized infrastructure and has become the go-to solution for stablecoin transfers – arguably the most significant use case in the crypto industry. The charismatic figure of Justin Sun has given the project high recognition and visibility, and since Sun is an independent player in the market, it provides certain freedoms in project development. For instance, Justin Sun was able to initiate the creation of SunPump, leading it to a brief yet notable success. We believe that the initiative and persistence of the ecosystem’s leader will continue to pave the way for its success, and the market clearly agrees with our optimistic outlook, consistently raising the blockchain’s valuation through its native coin.

Advertisement

Disclaimer: This article is provided for informational purposes only. It is not offered or intended to be used as legal, tax, investment, financial, or other advice.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Supermarkets back UK farmers in their fight against inheritance tax changes

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

Major supermarkets Tesco and Lidl have come out batting for UK farmers, calling for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to pause his inheritance tax reforms or else put the sector’s future at risk.

British farmers have taken to the streets in London in recent months to protest against the changes to inheritance tax reliefs announced in the October Budget, which will end decades of exemption from death duties. 

Advertisement

The reforms mean landowners will from April 2026 be subject to a 20 per cent levy on agricultural land above a threshold of between £1.3mn and £3mn, depending on whether they are married and if they own a home.

Ashwin Prasad, Tesco’s chief commercial officer, on Wednesday said the UK’s biggest supermarket “fully understand[s]” concerns raised by “many smaller farms” that were reliant on agricultural property relief and business property relief.

“We’ll be supporting the National Farmers Union’s calls for a pause in the implementation of the policy, while a full consultation is carried out,” he added. “This is not just a debate about individual policies — the UK’s future food security is at stake.”

Lidl said it was “concerned that the recent changes to the IHT regime will impact farmer and grower confidence and hold back the investment needed to build a resilient, productive and sustainable British food system”.

Advertisement

Meanwhile Co-op Dairy Group, a group of milk suppliers, told members in a letter that it had “directly contacted relevant government departments to communicate our hope that they will look again at the impact of the . . . changes” and said it backed calls to pause implementation of the policy.

Supermarkets themselves have drawn fire from farmers, with tractors this month parked at a number of major retailers around the country to raise awareness of the impact of the tax changes. On 16 January, supermarket Morrisons was granted a High Court injunction to block further protests.

Prior to the October Budget, farm campaign groups slammed supermarkets for squeezing their margins with low food prices and undercutting them by not backing homegrown produce.

Earlier on Wednesday, the Office for Budget Responsibility released a short costing of the IHT policy, estimating that it would raise an extra £500mn for the Treasury annually between 2027 and 2029, in line with the government’s estimates.

Advertisement

But the fiscal watchdog noted that receipts would probably taper off after seven years as farmers increasingly gifted their properties to children and modified their tax planning strategies.

The OBR also suggested that it would be “more difficult for some older individuals to quickly restructure their affairs” in terms of inheritance planning to adjust to the new measures. 

Victoria Atkins, Conservative shadow environment secretary, said the government had “chosen to destroy British family farming for little return. The OBR is clear that it will be near impossible for older farmers to restructure their affairs quickly in response to this vindictive tax.” 

Farmers say the sector was struggling with the pressures of climate change, real-term cuts to subsidies, high inflation, wafer-thin margins and the prospect of increased competition as the UK strikes post-Brexit trade deals before chancellor Rachel Reeves announced the IHT changes. 

Advertisement

The exemption was introduced in the 1980s to allow farms to remain in the same family after the death of an owner, a trend that many have warned will become much harder. However, it has helped push up the price of fields as wealthy individuals have bought agricultural land as a form of legal tax avoidance. 

Farmers looking to pass on their estate, and their spouses, are each eligible for £1mn of relief before they start paying IHT on their land, on top of the usual inheritance allowances. 

Given that couples already enjoy a threshold of £1mn on their estates that means that two spouses would enjoy a threshold nearer to £3mn, officials have noted.

A government spokesperson said: “Our reform to agricultural and business property reliefs will mean estates will pay a reduced effective inheritance tax rate of 20%, rather than standard 40%, and payments can be spread over 10 years, interest free.

Advertisement

“This is a fair and balanced approach, which fixes the public services we all rely on, affecting around 500 estates next year.”

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

This is the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

Published

on

This is the Samsung Galaxy S25 Edge

Samsung just teased the Galaxy S25 Edge — the new ultra-slim entry into the Galaxy S25 lineup. The phone isn’t out yet, and Samsung hasn’t provided any details, but now we know it’s real. And we have pictures.

Like pretty much every phone, it’s a thin silver slab. It’s got two cameras on the back, rather than the three cameras you’d get with other S25 phones. The Edge is rumored to measure just 6.4mm thick, but my colleagues Allison Johnson and Vjeran Pavic, who are on the ground at Galaxy Unpacked and took the below photos, weren’t able to actually hold or measure the device to confirm.

We’re trying to get closer so we can show perspective, but the place is mobbed with people. There’s a lot of excitement about this phone. By comparison, though, the regular Galaxy S25 is 7.2mm thick. So, it’s… even thinner.

Here are some of the pictures we took:

Advertisement

Photo by Vjeran Pavic / The Verge

Photo by Vjeran Pavic / The Verge

Photo by Vjeran Pavic / The Verge

Photo by Allison Johnson / The Verge

Advertisement

Photo by Allison Johnson / The Verge

Photo by Allison Johnson / The Verge

Photo by Allison Johnson / The Verge

Photo by Allison Johnson / The Verge

Advertisement

Update, January 22nd: Added more photos.

Source link

Continue Reading

CryptoCurrency

Hollywood directors say Ross Ulbricht documentary is in post-production

Published

on

The Silk Road founder received a commuted sentenced from US President Donald Trump on Jan. 21 after being sentenced to life in prison in 2015.

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Happy With Interval Funds: Cathie Wood

Published

on


Ark Invest CEO and CIO Cathie Wood says she’s “very happy with the interval fund structure” and it “seems to be a better wrapper” for public, private funds. She speaks with Scarlet Fu, Katie Greifeld and Eric Balchunas on “ETF IQ.” (Source: Bloomberg)

Source link

Continue Reading

CryptoCurrency

Inheritance tax raid on pension pots to ‘punish’ bereaved families on low incomes

Published

on

Inheritance tax raid on pension pots to 'punish' bereaved families on low incomes

Pension advisers and wealth management chiefs have issued stark warnings to the Treasury over plans to apply inheritance tax (IHT) to pension funds, cautioning that the proposed changes could cause severe delays and increased costs for bereaved families.

The changes, announced by Chancellor Rachel Reeves in her autumn Budget, aim to raise £1.5billion annually for the Treasury by 2030 by making pension funds part of inherited estates.


Industry leaders have described the proposals as “flawed and potentially damaging” in responses to Government consultations closing this week. The Government estimates its proposals will bring approximately 1.5 per cent more estates within the scope of death duties by 2027-28.

This increase comes on top of the four per cent of estates that already exceed the £325,000 nil-rate band. The threshold can rise to £500,000 in cases where a property is passed on.

Advertisement

Under the new proposals, personal representatives of inherited pension funds would need to identify the funds and calculate any inheritance tax owed, considering other assets in the estate.

Do you have a money story you’d like to share? Get in touch by emailing money@gbnews.uk.

Woman looking worried and tax

The Government is making changes to inheritance rules impacting pensions

Advertisement

GETTY

Pension scheme administrators would then be responsible for paying the inheritance tax before releasing the funds. The Society of Pension Professionals has warned that the government’s plans “impose unrealistic and impractical timescales”.

The trade association expressed concern about interest charges and penalties that could be imposed on pension scheme administrators for delays “over which they have little or no control”.

Steve Hitchiner, chair of the Society of Pension Professionals (SPP), said issues relating to the reporting and payment of inheritance tax on pensions was “vitally important”. He added that the current proposals “will result in numerous problems and challenges which could be largely avoided”.

Advertisement

Chief executives from major UK wealth managers, including Interactive Investor, Quilter and AJ Bell, have written directly to Reeves about their concerns over the looming raid from HM Revenue and Customs (HMRC).

Worried pensioner and inheritance tax written on calculatorBritons are preparing for drastic changes to inheritance tax rules GETTY

In their letter, seen by the Financial Times, they warned: “The complexity of the proposed approach, namely bringing all pensions into estates for IHT, will lead to substantial delays paying money to beneficiaries on death and cause distress for bereaved families.”

The executives called on the Government to “work with the pensions industry to agree a simpler method of achieving the policy aim”. Under current rules, inherited pensions can be paid more quickly to beneficiaries and used for urgent expenses like probate costs and funeral charges.

Anna Rogers, a senior partner at Arc Pensions Law, warned that the new process would disproportionately affect those with lower incomes. “The (new) process is complicated and it will punish lower earners,” she said.

“Wealthy people don’t need the money quickly . . . it seems the harm will be disproportionately to those who aren’t wealthy and those who die young.” Lawyers have expressed particular concern about the six-month window between death and the inheritance tax payment deadline.

Advertisement

Jeremy Harris, the partner at Fieldfisher, noted that pension scheme rules typically allow two years to pay death benefits, highlighting potential timing conflicts. He said: “There may be a need to sell assets to pay the tax, but there might be cases of people not being able to pay, for example if a property needs to be sold.”

Death in service benefits could face significant inheritance tax bills in cases where they are part of registered pension schemes. “It’s got the potential to be quite a mess . . . at some point there will be a backlash,” Harris added.

LATEST DEVELOPMENTS:

Person looking at pension savings on laptop

Britons are being warned about the looming inheritance tax raid

Advertisement

PEXELS

Kate Smith, the head of public affairs at Aegon, highlighted a lack of clarity over what falls within scope of the changes. She noted that “nobody thinks [the proposals] will work”.

The Treasury defended its position, stating: “We continue to incentivise pensions savings for their intended purpose of funding retirement instead of them being openly used as a vehicle to transfer wealth.”

The SPP has suggested alternative approaches, including leaving the calculation and payment of inheritance tax to personal representatives and HMRC.

Alternatively, they proposed that benefits could be taxed at the full 40 per cent rate and paid promptly by scheme administrators in cases where pensions are subject to inheritance tax. These alternatives aim to address the industry’s concerns while maintaining the government’s revenue objectives.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Samsung Unpacked: Samsung’s Galaxy S25 will support Content Credentials to identify AI-generated images

Published

on

Samsung Unpacked: Samsung’s Galaxy S25 will support Content Credentials to identify AI-generated images

Another tidbit just dropped following Wednesday’s Samsung Unpacked event. This one comes courtesy of Adobe, which notes that the new Galaxy S25 line will be the first handsets to support the Content Credentials standard, aimed at labeling AI-generated content as such.

The Coalition for Content Provenance and Authenticity (C2PA) group — of which Samsung is now officially a part — describes the standard as a “nutrition label for digital content.” The information presented includes how the content was generated and edited, as well as if any generative AI technologies were used in the process.

The standard arrives amid increasing concern around AI’s ability to propagate fake news and other misinformation. In addition to its presence in still images, it will be extended to include video, audio, and documents.

Content Credentials can be found in an image using Adobe’s Content Authenticity tool, which is now in beta.

Advertisement

Along with Samsung and Adobe, the C2PA includes some top names from media, social media, AI, and hardware, including Google, Intel, Microsoft, OpenAI, Amazon, BBC, Meta, Sony, Publicis, and Truepic.

The Galaxy S25 line is now up for preorder and set to start shipping February 7.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Trump’s 80% stake in his memecoin is a ‘huge red flag’ for investors because of a potential rug pull that would rocket the president’s net worth

Published

on


Trump could multiply his estimated wealth if his family’s conglomerate suddenly sells its substantial ownership in the token, finance professor Leonard Kostovetsky says. Read More

Source link

Continue Reading

Technology

Keep Your PC Running Like New for $15.99

Published

on

TL;DR: Get the Ashampoo WinOptimizer 27 lifetime license for just $15.99 to boost your PC’s speed, protect sensitive data, and fix errors.

In any professional environment, system performance matters. Ashampoo WinOptimizer 27 offers one-click solutions to keep your Windows PC fast, clean, and secure — without recurring subscription fees.

Whether you’re managing large datasets, running resource-intensive software, or just ensuring your system remains stable during critical tasks, this tool can help. For just $15.99 (reg. $55), unlock a lifetime license to a powerful suite of tools designed to optimize, protect, and prolong your PC’s lifespan.

Ashampoo WinOptimizer 27.
Ashampoo WinOptimizer 27. Image: StackCommerce

It’s common sense that your PC’s performance directly impacts productivity. Laggy systems, unnecessary files, and unaddressed privacy vulnerabilities slow down workflows and increase security risks. WinOptimizer 27 offers more than 30 optimization modules to help your system operate at peak performance.

This tool isn’t just for casual users — IT professionals, developers, and business owners can benefit from its automated cleanup, advanced diagnostics, and privacy protection features.

Advertisement

The Crash Analyzer module identifies system crashes and their causes, providing actionable insights to prevent future issues. Meanwhile, the Privacy Traces Cleaner helps secure sensitive data, especially when working with client information or proprietary business data.

One of the features that professionals can lean into is Process Prioritization. WinOptimizer automatically allocates system resources to your most important tasks; this means that whether you’re rendering videos, compiling code, or running data analysis, the tool adjusts your PC’s performance to match your workload. Plus, the Live Tuner speeds up application launches, allowing you to save time and avoid downtime.

The tool also offers SSD optimization to prolong your solid-state drive’s lifespan, which is crucial for professionals relying on fast storage solutions. Additionally, with the Tuning Assistant, you get custom optimization profiles that fit your exact needs, whether you’re focusing on gaming, development, or general office work.

Don’t miss trying out the Ashampoo WinOptimizer 27 lifetime license while it’s on sale for just $15.99 (reg. $55).

Advertisement

Prices and availability are subject to change.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2025 WordupNews