An SAS veteran has hit out at Labour’s decision to hit grieving families of military workers with inheritance tax from April 2027.

The money given to families of deceased Armed Forces members, called death in service payments, may be subject to a hefty cut after Labour MPs voted in favour of a raid.

READ THE FULL STORY

It’s been three days since President Donald Trump took office. And he has come out swinging.

On the 2024 campaign trail, he promised to bring rapid and sweeping change to American government and society if he were re-elected.

Some of his policies and reforms will take time – and congressional legislation – to enact. Other moves might be blocked by the courts.

In the first days of his presidency, however, Trump has already made waves with dozens of unilateral orders and actions that represent a substantial expansion of White House power.

For many of his supporters – so far – it looks like he has delivered on his promises.

“He signed all the executive orders that he told us he was going to do,” said 68-year-old Rick Frazier, a loyal Trump supporter from Ohio who has attended more than 80 of his rallies. “I’m satisfied with all that.”

That has been cause for concern among some. Mariann Budde, the Episcopal bishop of Washington, publicly asked Trump during a prayer service on Tuesday at the National Cathedral, to “have mercy upon people in our country who are scared now”.

Nowhere has this display of presidential authority been more prominent than on the topic of immigration, which polls suggest was a significant concern for many voters.

Just hours after taking office, Trump declared an emergency at the US-Mexico border, allowing him to deploy more US military personnel to the area.

He effectively closed the country to all new asylum-seekers and suspended already approved resettlement flights for refugees.

Mr Frazier’s daughter died of a heroin overdose last year. He told the BBC that the southern border was his top issue in the 2024 election.

“In my opinion had the border been closed, my daughter would not have had access to the compound that killed her,” he said.

Trump has also ordered authorities to stop granting automatic citizenship to the children of undocumented migrants born on American soil – setting up a lengthy legal battle over what had previously been viewed by courts as a constitutional guarantee.

One step that Trump repeatedly promised – but has yet to show signs of implementing – is mass deportations of migrants who crossed illegally into the US, something he said would start on day one of his presidency.

While some Trump officials have said the deportation process has begun, there have been no signs yet of the kind of law-enforcement raids or other expansive actions that would be necessary to detain and remove the millions of undocumented migrants who currently reside in the US.

Bryan Lanza, who previously served as a senior adviser to Trump, told the BBC’s Americast podcast that the total number of deportations is less important than the message it sends.

“It’s never about a number,” he said. “It’s more about the PR.”

If you deport a million undocumented migrants, he said, than the rest will start wondering if they’re next – and take steps to return to their home countries.

“Illegals aren’t welcomed here,” he said. “Every other country is allowed to say that. Why shouldn’t we?”

Immigration was a major issue that helped propel Trump to the White House, but in terms of voter concerns it was still dwarfed by worries about the economy and inflation.

So far the president has focused on energy policy – tying it directly to the high prices that millions of Americans have struggled with.

“When energy comes down, the prices of food and the prices of everything else come down,” Trump said on Tuesday evening. “Energy is the big baby.”

To that end, Trump declared a “national energy emergency” and rescinded Biden-era protections for fossil fuel extraction in Alaska and in American coastal waters. He also started the process of withdrawing the US from the Paris climate agreement, which commits nations to slashing emissions to try to avoid the most extreme effects of climate change.

Even optimistic estimates suggest these moves will take time to show any results, but Aziz Wehbey, a Syrian-American Republican voter in Allentown, Pennsylvania, said he was pleased by what he had seen so far.

“That’s a good sign for the economy, and for those of us who run businesses,” he said. “The economy is starting to move and not be frozen. Everyone will notice that.”

One topic that Trump has mentioned, but hasn’t acted on yet, is tariffs. He had pledged to slap them on some of America’s biggest trade partners on day one to protect American industries and generate new revenue to fund his favoured government programmes.

Economists, including some in the Trump administration, have cautioned that tariffs could drive up consumer costs and hurt American businesses that rely on imports in their supply chain. It could be a reason why Trump, with his eye on the stock market and economic growth, is treading more carefully when it comes to trade.

Many of President Trump’s other early executive actions focused on reshaping the vast federal workforce.

He has reinstated rules that allow him to fire senior-level civil servants, suspended new regulations and hiring, and ordered all federal employees involved in DEI – diversity, equity and inclusion – programmes to be put on paid leave.

He also renamed the Gulf of Mexico as the Gulf of America and instructed the US government to only recognise two sexes, male and female, in all official documents and forms. The changes, while controversial, have also been extremely popular with Trump’s base – a sign that the president will continue to lean in to contentious cultural issues.

Trump’s second term is just getting started. He promises more significant presidential actions in the days ahead – moves that will almost certainly test the limits of presidential power.

But the big splash, the noise, the drama, says former adviser Lanza, isn’t a problem for the president. It’s his strength.

“Where we are in modern politics today, which people haven’t figured out, is that from our standpoint, to communicate to voters are supportive of our issues, controversy enhances the message,” he said.

How do you get your message heard amid the overwhelming din of modern politics?

“It’s the controversy.”

Understand that, and the strategy behind Trump’s frenetic first days in office begins to come into focus.

With additional reporting from Bernd Debusmann Jr and Madeline Halpert

Kemi Badenoch has seemingly missed an opportunity to grill Sir Keir Starmer on the failings surrounding Axel Rudakubana’s horrific killings last summer.

The Prime Minister, who vowed not to leave a stone unturned in an inquiry into the Southport murders, might have expected Badenoch to take aim over a number of issues raised by other Conservative colleagues, including Shadow Justice Secretary Robert Jenrick.

Badenoch missed an opportunity to grill Starmer on the failings surrounding Axel Rudakubana’s horrific killings last summer

PARLIAMENTLIVE.TV

Badenoch continued by instead opting to quiz Starmer on Labour’s education reforms.

Advertisement

Ahead of the Leader of the Opposition’s first intervention, the Prime Minister also addressed the Southport killings.

He said: “We will change the law so that the most serious offenders attend their sentencing hearings.”

In response to the exchange, Reform UK’s deputy leader Richard Tice argued it was “unreal” that Badenoch had not probed Starmer on a topic other than education.

MORE ON KEMI BADENOCH:

Advertisement

Starmer was pressed on Labour’s education reforms rather than the atrocities in Southport

PARLIAMENTLIVE.TV

He said: “Kemi wastes PMQs again. Should have led on Trump and shocking debt figures to challenge Starmer.”

Advertisement

While leader Nigel Farage prodded: “Not a single question on Southport from Kemi Badenoch at PMQs today.

“What is the point of the Tories?”

A friend of Badenoch later told GB News’ Political Editor Christopher Hope that she raised the economy last week and acknowledged the Southport killer at the top of her contribution to PMQs.

Richard Tice warned that Kemi Badenoch had ‘wasted PMQs again’

Advertisement

PA

While another said there was “genuine anger” from Kemi and the wider party at what Labour is “doing to schools”.

“They’ve put some important stuff on safeguarding in the bill, but the bulk of it is reversing schools freedoms – rolling back academies, giving unions more control over who can be a teacher and reducing curriculum choice.”

Advertisement

Another Badenoch ally came to her defence after PMQs – Tory leadership runner-up Robert Jenrick, who said Sir Keir Starmer “had no answer” to the Leader of the Opposition’s questions – “because there are none”.