Technology
The best portable SSDs for 2024
If you want to back up valuable data from your PC, transfer videos to a Mac or offload a few games from your game console, a good external SSD can help. These tiny bricks may cost more than a traditional portable hard drive, but they’re noticeably faster, smaller and far more reliable in the long term. That said, determining the best external SSD for you isn’t as simple as picking the one that’s priced the lowest or packs the most space. (At least, it shouldn’t be.) If you’re looking to add some portable storage to your desktop or everyday carry, we’ve spent months weeding through the external solid-state drive market, testing several contenders and sorting out which ones deliver the most value. You can find our favorites, plus a quick rundown of what to know before buying one of these things, below.
Table of contents
Best external SSDs for 2024
Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget
Capacities: 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | Size: 2.56 x 1.97 x 0.39 inches | Weight: 1.34 ounces | USB interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 | Controller/bridge chip: Silicon Motion SM2320 | NAND type: TLC | Rated maximum sequential speeds: 1,050 MB/s read, 1,050 MB/s write | Warranty: Five years
The Crucial X9 Pro finished at or just under the top in each of our benchmarks relative to its speed class, and it stayed noticeably cooler than most of the other drives we tested after extended use. It’s a USB 3.2 Gen 2 model, so it’s slower than alternatives based on Thunderbolt, USB4 or USB 3.2 Gen 2×2, but it costs less, and it’s still quick enough for the non-professional tasks most people do with a portable SSD. Ports that can actually utilize USB 3.2 Gen 2 speeds tend to be more ubiquitous on mainstream computers, too. This isn’t the cheapest 10 Gbps drive around, but it’s in the same ballpark as its peers and isn’t too expensive. As of this writing, a 1TB model is available for $105, though it often goes for less. (We’ve seen it fall as low as $60 in the past.) 2TB and 4TB versions are also available.
Besides its relatively speedy performance, the X9 Pro stands out for being so tiny. Its aluminum case is shorter than a credit card and easy to fit in a pocket, weighing in at just 1.34 ounces. The whole thing is IP55-rated, so it’ll survive dust and water splashes, and it’s backed with a five-year warranty, which is a couple years longer than some alternatives.
Our only real complaints are that the included USB-C cable is small and there’s no adapter for USB-A ports in the box. And though the X9 Pro can utilize 256-bit hardware-based encryption, Micron (Crucial’s parent company) has been late to release its own password protection tool to take full advantage of it. We’ll also note that there’s a cheaper non-”Pro” X9, but that one uses QLC flash, so it’s not as durable or fast (especially with sustained writes). The X9 Pro is the better buy.
- Great performance for its speed class
- Rugged and super compact form factor
- Stays relatively cool with extended use
- Five-year warranty
- There are cheaper 10 Gbps drives
- Included USB-C cable is short, and there’s no USB-A cable in the box
Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget
Capacities: 1TB, 2TB | Size: 2.74 x 1.28 x 0.53 inches | Weight: 1.01 ounces | USB interface: USB 3.2 Gen 2 | Controller/bridge chip: Silicon Motion SM2320 | NAND type: TLC | Rated maximum sequential speeds: 1,050 MB/s read, 1,000 MB/s write | Warranty: Five years
The Kingston XS1000 performs similarly to the Crucial X9 Pro but has sold for less over the last several months, so it’s a good alternative if you want to save some cash. A 1TB model is available for $75 as of this writing, which is $30 less than the X9 Pro, while the 2TB version is down to $120, which is a roughly $50 drop. There’s no 4TB option, though.
At those prices, the XS1000 is a good value for everyday backups and transfers. It kept up with or slightly edged the X9 Pro across our benchmarks: In our custom file transfer test, for example, its reads were a second faster, while its writes were only six seconds slower. (The two drives appear to have comparable internals and are based on a similar controller — the Silicon Power SM2320G — so this may not be a huge surprise.) It topped every USB 3.2 Gen 2 drive we tested in 3DMark’s gaming storage benchmark as well. It’s slightly thicker than the X9 Pro but still wonderfully portable, with its stubby rectangular design weighing just over an ounce. Like the Crucial drive, it’s backed by a five-year warranty.
Where Kingston’s model falls behind Crucial’s X9 Pro is in the extras. There’s no formal IP or drop ratings, so we wouldn’t feel as comfortable chucking it around on the go. It lacks hardware-based encryption, and it only comes with a USB-C to A cable, so you’ll need to supply your own adapter if your laptop only has USB-C ports. It doesn’t stay quite as cool as the X9 Pro with continuous use, and its sustained write performance isn’t as fast either, so it’s worth paying up if you plan to regularly copy hundreds of gigabytes to the SSD (and can’t just get a higher-class model). For the money, though, all of this may be easier to overlook.
- Faster than most 10 Gbps drives we tested
- Aggressively priced
- Highly portable
- Five-year warranty
- No formal water-resistance or drop protection
- No USB-C to C cable in the box
- Only available in 1TB or 2TB
- Slower sustained write performance than X9 Pro with very large files
Photo by Jeff Dunn / Engadget
Capacities: 1TB, 2TB, 4TB | Size: 4.13 x 2.52 x 0.62 inches (with fan off), 4.82 x 2.52 x 0.62 inches (with fan on) | Weight: 6.4 ounces | USB interface: USB4 (40 Gbps) | Controller/bridge chip: Asmedia ASM2464PD | NAND type: TLC | Rated maximum sequential speeds: 3,800 MB/s read, 3,700 MB/s write | Warranty: Five years
If you’re a media editor, IT professional or just an enthusiast willing to pay for the fastest portable SSD possible, get the ADATA SE920. It utilizes the newer USB4 interface, and it blew away every non-40 Gbps drive we tested across our benchmark tests. In AmorphousDiskMark, for example, the Crucial X9 Pro delivered sequential reads and writes around 1,015 MB/s and 950 MB/s, respectively; here, those were about 3,350 MB/s and 3,125 MB/s. In our custom mixed file transfer test, we were able to move our 70GB folder to our MacBook in 32 seconds; with the X9 Pro, that process took about 81 seconds on average. Writing the folder to the drive, meanwhile, was about 30 seconds faster. If you’re buying an external SSD to move around large chunks of data, this kind of leap adds up.
The drive itself is significantly bigger and thicker than either of our picks above, but it’s not so large that we’d call it unwieldy. It’s about the size of a deck of cards, so it’ll fit better in a bag than a pants pocket. Beyond that, the brushed metal exterior feels crisp to the touch, and ADATA supports the device with a five-year warranty.
That said, this thing can get seriously hot. The design includes a built-in micro fan to help dissipate heat, which you activate just by clicking the case down; that’s clever, but it’s not enough to keep the drive cool on its own. All of this comes at a price premium, too, with a 1TB model currently available for $180. But if performance is the only thing that matters to you, it’s hard to do better.
- Blazingly fast 40 Gbps performance
- Slick metal enclosure
- Smaller than other Thunderbolt SSDs we tested
- Clever built-in fan
- Five-year warranty
- Gets hot even with fan activated
- Pricier and still larger than other picks
- Requires USB4 port to reach maximum speeds
Other external SSDs we tested
The pre-built OWC Express 1M2 is a premium-feeling USB4 SSD that’s roughly as fast as the ADATA SE920, but it’s larger and significantly more expensive as of this writing.
If you’re in the relatively small group with a PC that supports USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 but not Thunderbolt or USB4, the Crucial X10 Pro is essentially a faster version of our top pick. The Lexar SL600 is a larger but slightly quicker option, while the Lexar SL500, Kingston XS2000 or Samsung T9 could also work if you see them on discount. As a reminder, though, drives like these are aimed primarily at content creators and other professionals, and you have to make sure you won’t upgrade to a device with a faster USB interface anytime soon.
The Samsung T7 Shield has a conveniently rugged design with a rubberized, IP65-rated shell. It also comes with both USB-C and USB-A cables. But it was consistently slower than the X9 Pro and XS1000 in our benchmark tests, plus it has a shorter three-year warranty.
The Silicon Power PX10 is an especially affordable USB 3.2 Gen 2 model. Its peak speeds weren’t too far off the X9 Pro or XS1000 in synthetic benchmarks, but it can get distractingly hot and its sustained writes are markedly worse. It took 50 seconds longer to move our 70GB custom test folder to this drive compared to the X9 Pro, for example.
The Crucial X6 is another low-cost option that’s a good bit slower than our top picks. It’s limited to a three-year warranty and lacks an IP rating as well. It’s not a terrible option for the basics, but there’s little reason to get it over the XS1000 when their prices are similar.
The OWC Envoy Pro FX is well-built and supports Thunderbolt 3 and USB 3.2 Gen 2, but it’s a smidge slower than the SE920 and Express 1M2, and it’s much pricier than the former.
What to consider before buying an external SSD
Capacity
The first thing to figure out before buying a portable SSD is just how much storage space you need. Most of the drives we considered for this guide are available in capacities ranging from one to four terabytes, though plenty of smaller and larger options exist.
There’s no hard-and-fast rule for which size is “best” — that’ll ultimately depend on your budget and what exactly you’re looking to stash. But in general, it’s better to overcompensate than underdo it. Nobody wants to be forced into buying a second drive because they filled the first one up too quickly. If you’re backing up a PC, a good rule of thumb is to buy an external SSD with twice as much space as your computer’s internal storage. This way, you can save at least one full backup while also having room for additional data. If you want to store a bunch of PlayStation or Xbox games with huge install sizes, you may need more space. If you just want to back up a small collection of files, you may be better off saving your cash and just getting a smaller USB flash drive instead, which aren’t quite the same as the external SSDs we tested for this guide.
Price
In general, you get a better price-per-gigabyte ratio the further you go up the capacity ladder. As of this writing, the 1TB Samsung T9 is priced at $135, or $0.14 per gigabyte (GB), while the 4TB version is available for $350, or $0.09 per GB. That technically makes the larger model a better “value,” but not everyone needs to pay that much more upfront.
SSDs in the same speed class tend to not vary too wildly in terms of performance, so part of our decision-making for this guide came down to which ones are often the cheapest. But prices can fluctuate over time; if you see that one of our top picks is priced way higher than a comparable honorable mention, feel free to get the latter. At this point in time, costs are broadly trending upwards.
Speed and USB interface
Just about all external SSDs are significantly faster than mechanical hard disk drives (HDDs), so you’ll save time waiting for files to transfer and games to load no matter what. Within the market, however, there are distinct performance tiers. These are defined in large part by the USB interface a drive supports. While all of the SSDs we considered for this guide can connect over USB-C, some USB-C connections can supply faster transfer speeds than others. Sorting through this can get real confusing real fast, so we’ll try to put it in simple terms.
Essentially, you can divide today’s crop of portable SSDs into five segments. At the top are drives that utilize Thunderbolt 3 or 4 or the more recent USB4 spec, which have a theoretical maximum transfer rate of 40 gigabits per second (Gbps). Note that USB4 comes in two different variants, though, one of which is limited to 20 Gbps. Below that is USB 3.2 Gen 2×2, which also tops out at 20 Gbps. (Getting confused yet?) Then you have USB 3.2 Gen 2, which maxes at 10 Gbps. Next is USB 3.2 Gen 1, which is capped at 5 Gbps. Lastly, we’ll bundle together SSDs that use older standards and aren’t worth considering here.
For everyday folks, a good USB 3.2 Gen 2 drive is the sweet spot between fast enough performance and a cheap enough price, so those make up our chief recommendations below. If you work in a creative field or don’t mind paying extra to shave seconds off your large file transfers, though, a “higher-tier” model would make sense. However, note that systems that utilize USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 aren’t super common — no Mac supports it, for one — and the interface is effectively being replaced by USB4.
In general, your chain is only as strong as its weakest link: If your computer only has USB 3.2 Gen 2 ports, for example, you could still use a Thunderbolt SSD, but you won’t get beyond Gen 2 speeds. Make sure you know what you’re working with before you buy.
As a refresher, storage devices are broadly measured in terms of read and write speeds. The former refers to how long it takes to access something from the drive; the latter, how long it takes to save something to it. From there, you can break these metrics into sequential and random performance. Sequential speeds tend to matter more with portable SSDs, since most people use them to save or access long, constant streams of data such as a bunch of high-res photos. Random speeds would be important if you want to run video games off the drive, since that’d involve reading and writing smaller, more scattered files. Either way, how well an SSD can sustain its performance with extended use is also critical.
Other performance factors and enclosures
A modern portable SSD’s speeds aren’t just about its USB interface, though. Its performance can also depend on how advanced its controller is, whether it has a native USB flash controller or a separate bridge chip to communicate with a host device, the kind and quality of NAND flash memory it uses, whether it has a DRAM cache or it’s DRAM-less, and more.
We’re simplifying things, but here are some quick tips: Drives with triple-level cell (TLC) memory aren’t as cheap as quad-level cell (QLC) SSDs, but they’re generally more reliable and they offer better write performance. Having a dedicated DRAM cache helps if you plan to hit your drive with more intense, sustained workloads, but may not be worth the extra cost for most people. Some models with native flash controllers may not perform as well as those with a bridging chip, depending on the SSD inside, but they typically draw less heat and are physically smaller. All of this is to say that an external SSD’s speeds aren’t quite as straightforward as what the manufacturer chooses to advertise on the box.
It’s also worth remembering that you can turn an internal SSD into a portable solution with a good enclosure. If you have a spare drive and don’t mind going the DIY route, this can be a cheaper and more flexible solution, though we’ve stuck to pre-built models for this guide for the sake of simplicity.
Size, durability, endurance and warranty
Most portable SSDs are impressively small and light, so they won’t be difficult to tuck in a bag (or even a pocket) and take on the go. We note below if any drive is bulkier than usual.
Nothing we’re talking about matters if your drive can’t last in the long term. It’s hard to definitively say which external SSDs are the most reliable, but we scoured through user reviews and feedback while researching this guide to ensure none of our picks show a pattern of catastrophic errors. If there was too much smoke around a particular model, we steered clear. We ruled out certain drives from SanDisk and Western Digital, for instance, after reports from Ars Technica and The Verge noted an issue that led to data loss (and lawsuits) in 2023.
That said, one of the big reasons you’d buy an SSD in general is its superior durability. Because it has no moving mechanical parts inside, an SSD has far fewer avenues to failure than an external hard drive. You still don’t want to be careless with them, but an accidental drop shouldn’t be the end of the world.
Some portable SSDs build on this inherent ruggedness with plastic or rubberized casings and more robust waterproofing. These aren’t necessary for everyone, but if you’re a frequent traveler or someone who often works outdoors, there are options for you.
Still, all drives can fail. If you have any sort of data you’d be distraught to lose, you should back it up regularly, then make a second backup, ideally with a cloud service. Along those protective lines, we also took note of the warranty policy for each drive we tested. Just about all of them are backed for either three or five years; of course, longer is better.
Encryption and software
It’s not uncommon to store sensitive data on a portable SSD, so some models offer extra security features like hardware-based encryption — i.e., direct scrambling of data stored on the drive itself — built-in keypads and fingerprint readers to protect against unauthorized access if the drive is lost or stolen. While not top requirements, perks like these are certainly good to have. Some SSDs also come with companion software to further manage the drive. The best of those can be handy to have around, but we wouldn’t call them essential.
How we test external SSDs
Unfortunately, we did not have access to a device that can make full use of USB 3.2 Gen 2, USB 3.2 Gen 2×2 and Thunderbolt 4/USB4 speeds interchangeably, so we had to split our testing across multiple devices, including an M1 Pro MacBook Pro and an Alienware gaming PC running Windows 11. Because of this, we primarily compared the portable SSDs within each “class” against one another. Before switching OSes, we reformatted each drive to each platform’s standard file system format: APFS for macOS and NTFS for Windows.
After researching which SSDs had enough positive feedback to be worth testing in the first place, we put 13 drives through a range of synthetic and “real-world” benchmark tests. On Windows, these included CrystalDiskMark, PCMark 10’s Data Drive Benchmark and 3DMark’s gaming-focused Storage Benchmark. On macOS, we used AmorphousDiskMark (effectively a Mac version of CrystalDiskMark), BlackMagic Disk Speed Test and ATTO Disk Benchmark.
We also timed how long it took for each drive to read and write a custom 70GB folder filled with roughly 11,500 different files, including photos, videos, music files, PDFs and other large and small data types scattered across numerous subfolders. We performed multiple passes for each test to avoid irregularities, and we kept track of each SSD’s heat levels over the course of the whole suite. Our process wasn’t a perfect science, but it gave us a general sense of how each drive compares to other models in its price and performance range.
Recent updates
October 2024: We’ve taken a sweep through this guide to ensure all pricing and availability info is still correct. Our recommendations are unchanged.
Intel’s new Core Ultra 9 285K is finally here, promising a boost in performance with a significant reduction in power requirements, at least according to Intel. As you can read in my Core Ultra 9 285K review, Intel’s performance claims aren’t as rosy as reality, especially when stacked up against what is unequivocally the best processor for gaming you can buy: AMD’s Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
I threw both processors on the test bench to pit them head-to-head, looking at performance across productivity and gaming apps, as well as thermals and efficiency. These CPUs target different users, but there are still a lot of interesting comparisons we can look at between them.
Specs
The Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are radically different CPUs, and that becomes clear when you compare their specs directly. Although it’s generally not a good idea to compare specs between two CPUs in the same class, the gap in specs here is so large that we can make some interesting observations. The main thing that’s different between the two CPUs is core count.
Get your weekly teardown of the tech behind PC gaming
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is a fairly straightforward chip in that regard. It comes with eight Zen 4 cores and a total of 16 threads, and it can boost up to 5GHz. That’s not what’s interesting about the CPU. It’s the 104MB of cache packed on top of the CPU die, split between 8MB of L2 cache and 96MB of L3 cache thanks to AMD’s 3D V-Cache packaging tech.
| Core Ultra 9 285K | Ryzen 7 7800X3D | |
| Cores/Threads | 24/24 (8P+16E) | 8/16 |
| Boost clock speed | 5.7GHz | 5GHz |
| Base clock speed | 3.7GHz | 4.2GHz |
| Cache (L2 + L3) | 76MB | 104MB |
| TDP | 250W | 120W |
| Price | $589 | $450 |
The Core Ultra 9 285K doesn’t have any fancy 3D V-Cache, but it still has a few tricks of its own. It’s a 24-core CPU, but unlike the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, it doesn’t come with simultaneous multi-threading (SMT). Each core only has a single thread. In addition, Intel uses its hybrid architecture, mixing together the Lion Cove P-core design with the Skymont E-core design. According to Intel, the E-cores are the main performance drivers here, unlike with the Core i9-14900K, where the E-cores were relatively weak.
With more cores and higher clock speeds, it shouldn’t come as a surprise that the Core Ultra 9 285K has much higher power requirements. I’ll address efficiency directly a bit lower down in this comparison, but I can tell you now that, under a full load, the Core Ultra 9 285K indeed draws twice as much (or more) power than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — though usually with much better performance.
Pricing
The Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 7 7800X3D force you to think about pricing because, depending on what you’re using your PC for, you can save quite a bit of money. The Core Ultra 9 285K is newer, and it’s the flagship chip from Intel’s latest range, so you’ll spend $589 if you want to pick it up now. The price will drop over time — the Core i9-14900K is about $450 a year after releasing — but until we see the next generation from Intel, you can expect to spend over $500.
The Ryzen 7 7800X3D is much cheaper at $450, though I’ve seen some strange price shifts with the CPU over the past several months. Just a few weeks before publishing this comparison, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D was sold out everywhere, and prior to that, you could commonly find it for around $320. Now, at the time of publishing, you’ll find it between $450 and $500, but I expect the price will drop very soon.
AMD has confirmed that its next-gen 3D V-Cache CPU is arriving on November 7, so depending on when you’re reading this, make sure to check in on the price of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. If the new CPU is out by then, I expect we’ll see the price drop to around $350 to $400.
Even with its higher price, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is significantly cheaper than the Core Ultra 9 285K — $139 cheaper, at least, and close to $239 cheaper if the Ryzen 7 7800X3D drops in price.
Productivity performance
Here’s some quick proof that the Core Ultra 9 285K and Ryzen 7 7800X3D are in completely different weight classes. As you can see from Cinebench R24 above, the Core Ultra 9 285K is much faster than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D — it’s not even close. Intel says this CPU is particularly strong in a ray-traced renderer line Cinebench, but even if you dropped 10% or 15% of the performance from the Core Ultra 9 285K, it would still be miles ahead of the Ryzen 7 7800X3D.
For more of a mixed-use benchmark, take a look at Geekbench 6. The Core Ultra 9 285K still runs away with multi-core performance, but the single-core delta is much smaller. And despite the clear lead in multi-core performance, that gap is smaller, too. Throughout my testing, one thing became clear — the Core Ultra 9 285K is really fast in certain applications, but that performance doesn’t apply everywhere.
A great example of that is Photoshop. You’d assume that the raw multi-core advantage of the Core Ultra 9 285K would mean it obviously wins against the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, but that’s not the case. In fact, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is faster in Photoshop based on my testing. That’s not good considering the price and spec gap between these two CPUs. You’d expect the Core Ultra 9 285K to mop the floor with the Ryzen 7 7800X3D across all productivity applications.
In Premiere Pro, the Core Ultra 9 285K reclaims a dominant spot, but it really shouldn’t be this close. Not only is the Core Ultra 9 285K a much more capable CPU, it also has access to QuickSync in Premiere Pro, which speeds up performance significantly. The fact that these two CPUs are even competitive in Premiere shows how the performance of the Core Ultra 9 285K can be disappointing in certain apps.
Gaming performance
Gaming performance is where we see a more consistent divergence. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D crushes. Across the 10 games I tested, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D didn’t lose a single one. Sometimes it’s only showing a minor performance improvement, but in games like F1 22 and Cyberpunk 2077, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D provides a transformative uplift in gaming performance.
Not all games respond well to the additional cache on the Ryzen 7 7800X3D. As you can see from titles like Assassin’s Creed Mirage and Black Myth: Wukong, there’s some other factor limiting the performance of the processor — in most cases, your graphics card. However, other games can leverage the additional cache in quite a big way, as shown off by Final Fantasy XIV, Tiny Tina’s Wonderlands, and even Red Dead Redemption 2.
For the Core Ultra 9 285K, it can only hope to match the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and in most games, it’s not even close to doing that. If you’re focused mainly on gaming, there’s really no contest here. The Ryzen 7 7800X3D absolutely crushes the Core Ultra 9 285K, and it’s significantly cheaper.
Thermals and efficiency
Another area where the Ryzen 7 7800X3D leads is efficiency. It not only has much lower rated power, it can also deliver higher performance in games while consuming less power. You can see that in action in the chart above. Looking solely at peak power draw during these games, the Ryzen 7 7800X3D stayed much more efficient under a heavy workload.
That’s not be critical of Intel. As you can see from the Core i9-14900K, Intel made massive efficiency improvements this generation, and it’s often able to deliver similar performance under 100 watts. But it’s still more power than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, which rarely goes above 50 watts in games.
Temperature is a different story. On average, the Core Ultra 9 285K was a bit cooler than the Ryzen 7 7800X3D while playing games. It’s not a massive difference, but I tested with a 360mm all-in-one liquid cooler. In a small form factor PC, those temperature differences can really add up, and the Core Ultra 9 285K is set up to handle a more thermally constrained environment better.
It’s important to remember the design of 3D V-Cache CPUs. The cache is stacked directly on top of the cores, serving as an insolating layer between the cores and the integrated heat spreader (IHS). That’s why the Ryzen 7 7800X3D, and other 3D V-Cache CPUs, tend to run a bit hotter and why they aren’t unlocked for overclocking.
The gaming king reigns supreme
There’s really no contest here if you’re a gamer — the Ryzen 7 7800X3D is the way to go. It’s much faster, and it’s cheaper, and although productivity performance lags, the CPU still puts up a surprisingly impressive fight in apps like Premiere Pro and Photoshop.
The natural counter to that is productivity performance. If that’s what you care about, the Core Ultra 9 285K is the way to go. However, the inconsistent performance I saw with Intel’s latest CPU is worth keeping in mind. If you want good productivity performance and gaming in equal stride, I’d push you toward Intel’s Core i9-14900K or AMD’s latest Ryzen 9 9950X instead, the former of which is available for around $450.
Technology analyst Jeff Pu suggests that the iPhone 17 Pro Max may feature a ‘much narrower’ Dynamic Island than its predecessors, such as the iPhone 16 Pro. This reiterates information that Pu first shared in May this year.
iPhone 17 Pro Max could use a new lens technology for Face ID
According to the analyst, the iPhone 17 Pro Max will adopt a ‘metalens’ for Face ID, which would result in a ‘much narrower’ Dynamic Island. For those curious, the ‘metalens’ is a thin, flat lens with microscopic patterns etched onto it, allowing it to focus light more precisely compared to the standard curved lenses of an iPhone. Unfortunately, Pu does not explain how Apple plans to implement this technology.
Apple introduced the Dynamic Island with the iPhone 14 Pro models, replacing the notch. Since then, the pill-shaped cutout has remained the same size across all models in the iPhone 15 and 16 lineups. If true, a narrower Dynamic Island would offer a refreshed look for the successor to the iPhone 16 Pro Max.
According to a previous report, the iPhone 17 Pro models may get notable zoom camera improvements. A recent report from The Elec also suggests that Apple could use the Watch Series 10’s LTPO3 display technology for future iPhones. While LTPO2 technology utilizes oxide for two switching TFTs, LTPO3 goes a step further by incorporating oxide into the driving TFT as well.
A more efficient display for future iPhones
LTPO3 allows displays to dynamically switch between refresh rates without the need for an additional component between the graphics controller and the GPU. As a result, LTPO3 panels consume less power than LTPO2 panels, even though both can reach as low as 1Hz.
This new display tech is also expected to offer improved viewing angles for future iPhones. For those interested in numbers, the Watch Series 10 (which uses LTPO3) is 40% brighter when viewed off-angle compared to its predecessor, which uses an LTPO2 display.
The improved power efficiency of LTPO3 technology could translate to longer battery life compared to iPhones with older display tech. However, the report does not specify when Apple might begin incorporating this new display technology into its iPhone lineup.
In terms of performance, the iPhone 17 Pro models will feature the A19 Pro chip. It utilizes TSMC’s 3nm process node and is likely to deliver better energy efficiency, faster processing, and improved overall performance.
Technology
University Research Validates Blind Screen™’s Game-Changing 49% Heat Reduction Technology in Race to Net Zero
A Derby company’s innovative window blind system has been scientifically proven to dramatically reduce heat loss in a series of tests carried out by researchers at the University of Salford.
Blind Screen™ is set to unveil its next-generation thermal solution, the Blind Screen™ 02 DT, at the prestigious British Blinds & Shutter Association Exhibition. The highly anticipated product launch will take place from October 27-29, 2024, at the Coventry Building Society Arena. This latest innovation builds upon the company’s scientifically proven thermal efficiency technology, promising to further revolutionise the window covering industry.
Blind Screen™ at Pride Park has invented an innovative contemporary multi-function blinds system which is manufactured in the UK and is now fitted by more than 1,000 national and independent blind companies across the UK.
Blind Screen™ products combine ultra-strength net and honeycomb fabrics with several unique features including 100% black out and thermal insulation technology with sideways opening fly, pollen and haze screens.
This not only increases the energy efficiency in any type of residential or commercial building but also protects against environmental pollutants and extreme outdoor temperatures.
The Blind Screen™ system was tested for heat retention at the University of Salford’s Energy House 2.0 test facility as part of Innovate UK Future Homes Study.
The rigorous tests showed that the Blind Screen™ system reduced heat loss by 49% compared with just double glazing alone – reinforcing Blind Screen™’s claim that it is probably the most thermally-efficient blind in the UK if not the world.
Professor Will Swan, Director of Energy House Labs at the University of Salford, explained: “Our work with Blind Screen™ is a perfect example of how the Future Homes Innovation Accelerator programme is supporting companies to innovate and grow.
“The development of new energy saving products is an essential step for the UK in meeting its Climate Change goals and minimising energy costs for householders.
“Our previous research in the area of blinds, curtains, and window coverings has demonstrated that they can make a valuable contribution to energy savings and reducing carbon emissions for householders.
“Blind Screen™ has recognised this opportunity and through working with the University of Salford and making use of our unique testing facilities, they have developed a class leading thermal window blind.
“We are very pleased with this successful outcome that will help cut energy bills and support the future growth of the company.
Blind Screen™ is the brainchild of entrepreneurs Lenny Reynolds, who has operated in the blinds industry for more than 20 years, and marketing and lead generation expert Paul Cheetham MCIM.
Lenny Reynolds explained: “Blind Screen™ offers a totally new category in the highly competitive industry which has been lacking any innovation since the launch and then mass production of shutters more than 20 years ago.
“We have developed the world’s first 100% blackout sideways motion blind with new thermal efficient fabric and we were keen to get this independently tested by the University of Salford.”
“The heat efficiency test results are amazing and reinforces what we and the growing number of blind fitting companies across the UK – and soon the world – already know that this is a game-changer in the blinds market.”
“This research further strengthens our position in the highly-competitive market and will pave the way for further research and development in new products which we plan to take worldwide through a number of top level partnerships.”
Paul Cheetham continued: “The past 12 months have been an amazing journey for Blind Screen™ so far, we have amassed a staggering worldwide audience of 1.4 Million followers and close to 800 million views across our social media platforms.
“After a series of soft launches at international trade shows and consumer exhibitions such as Grand Designs Live, we have already massively grown the company by teaming up with trade partners and educating the homeowners through organic social media with a huge following.
“We are committed to facilitating the growth of fellow small businesses who will sell and install Blind Screen™ in their local areas through unrivalled product design, training, lead generation and customer support and now have our sights set on international partnerships.”
Professor Kathryn Mitchell CBE DL, Vice-Chancellor, University of Derby added,
“It has been a pleasure supporting Blind Screen Limited in their innovation journey over the last 12 months through. The University of Derby’s College of Science and Engineering have provided guidance and expertise through our lead academics in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering and Zero Carbon for many aspects of the product development for their new range, including design, 3D printing and prototyping as well as thermal testing. Having just completed an Accelerated Knowledge Transfer Partnership with Blind Screen Limited, we are now excited to expand our collaboration and are looking forward to further supporting their journey and growth.”
Led by Innovate UK on behalf of UK Research and Innovation, the pilot Innovation Accelerator programme is investing £100m in 26 transformative R&D projects to accelerate the growth of three high-potential innovation clusters – Glasgow City Region, Greater Manchester and West Midlands. Supporting the Government’s levelling-up agenda, this is a new model of R&D decision-making that empowers local leaders to harness innovation in support of regional economic growth and help attract private R&D investment and develop future technologies.
Science & Environment
The Elements of Marie Curie review: Dava Sobel’s biography of Marie Curie shows how she helped women into science
Marie Curie pictured at work in her laboratory in Paris, in 1912
Universal History Archive/Getty Images
The Elements of Marie Curie
Dava Sobel (Fourth Estate, UK; Grove Atlantic, US)
ON 7 November 1867, Marya Salomea Sklodowska was born in Warsaw, then part of the Russian Empire. She was the youngest of five children, and became known as “Manya” by her family.
She was a voraciously curious child who learned to read at the age of 4 and developed a fascination with science, thanks in large part to her father, a teacher of physics and mathematics. Even so, no one could…
\\\\\ Can’t get enough of us? (It’s OK, we understand, we’re pretty great 😎) ///////////
Hit us up on Instagram 👉 https://bit.ly/3RDVXJc
Drop a like on Facebook: 👉 https://bit.ly/3x2iS7o
Visit our TikTok 👉 https://bit.ly/3YweBoH
Or see some hot takes on Twitter 👉 https://bit.ly/3K309R9
Looking for some tech help, giveaways or just want to be a part of the community?
👾 You can join our Discord server 👉https://discord.gg/vewj4fP
If you’re just after some more info though
Website 👉 https://bit.ly/3JLDxUN .
source
To try everything Brilliant has to offer—free—for a full 30 days, visit https://brilliant.org/Wolfgang/ . The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
Follow me:
Mastodon https://tilde.zone/@notthebee
GitHub https://github.com/notthebee
Twitch https://twitch.com/notthebeee
Bluesky https://bsky.app/profile/notthebe.ee
Support the channel:
Patreon https://patreon.com/WolfgangsChannel
YouTube Members https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCsnGwSIHyoYN0kiINAGUKxg/join
Ko-fi (one time donation) https://ko-fi.com/wolfgangschannel
Music:
Steven Beddall – Cuts So Deep (Instrumental Version)
Skygaze – Hug Me
Meod – Crispy Cone
Kitrano – Slow Evening
Yestalgia – Coffee Shop
Abloom – Blue Light
Lolek – Cruise Control
Hale – Moment
Vladislav Kurnikov – A New Time
Videos are edited with Davinci Resolve Studio. I use Affinity Photo for thumbnails and Ableton Live for audio editing.
Video gear:
Camera https://geni.us/K8OOyKV (Amazon)
Main lens https://geni.us/jnnElY4 (Amazon)
Microphone https://geni.us/tgiSqL (Amazon)
Key light https://geni.us/Gi1zE2 (Amazon)
Softbox https://geni.us/F86pM (Amazon)
Secondary light https://geni.us/aciv (Amazon)
Other stuff that I use:
Monitor https://geni.us/KUzcmcP (Amazon)
Monitor arm https://geni.us/5RXu (Amazon)
Laptop stand https://geni.us/X5vx9Af (Amazon)
Keyboard https://www.amazon.de/HHKB-PD-KB401W-Tastenkappen-Professionelle-Mechanische/dp/B082TXQD1S
Mouse https://geni.us/KB7h (Amazon)
Audio interface https://geni.us/sdhWsC (Amazon)
As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases
Timestamps:
00:00 The intro
00:47 Brilliant.org
01:45 The CPU
04:19 What’s the catch?
05:12 The pre-built
07:00 Power consumption
09:59 Replacing the PSU
12:38 Replacing the motherboard
13:29 Performance
15:22 Final words
source
-
Technology4 weeks agoIs sharing your smartphone PIN part of a healthy relationship?
-
Science & Environment1 month agoHyperelastic gel is one of the stretchiest materials known to science
-
Science & Environment1 month agoHow to unsnarl a tangle of threads, according to physics
-
Science & Environment1 month ago‘Running of the bulls’ festival crowds move like charged particles
-
Science & Environment1 month agoMaxwell’s demon charges quantum batteries inside of a quantum computer
-
Technology1 month agoWould-be reality TV contestants ‘not looking real’
-
Science & Environment4 weeks agoX-rays reveal half-billion-year-old insect ancestor
-
Science & Environment1 month agoSunlight-trapping device can generate temperatures over 1000°C
-
Technology4 weeks agoUkraine is using AI to manage the removal of Russian landmines
-
Science & Environment1 month agoLiquid crystals could improve quantum communication devices
-
Science & Environment1 month agoQuantum ‘supersolid’ matter stirred using magnets
-
TV3 weeks agoসারাদেশে দিনব্যাপী বৃষ্টির পূর্বাভাস; সমুদ্রবন্দরে ৩ নম্বর সংকেত | Weather Today | Jamuna TV
-
Football3 weeks agoRangers & Celtic ready for first SWPL derby showdown
-
Science & Environment1 month agoLaser helps turn an electron into a coil of mass and charge
-
Science & Environment1 month agoA new kind of experiment at the Large Hadron Collider could unravel quantum reality
-
Womens Workouts1 month ago3 Day Full Body Women’s Dumbbell Only Workout
-
News3 weeks agoMassive blasts in Beirut after renewed Israeli air strikes
-
News3 weeks ago▶ Hamas Spent $1B on Tunnels Instead of Investing in a Future for Gaza’s People
-
Technology3 weeks agoSamsung Passkeys will work with Samsung’s smart home devices
-
Business3 weeks agoWhen to tip and when not to tip
-
MMA3 weeks ago‘Uncrowned queen’ Kayla Harrison tastes blood, wants UFC title run
-
Sport3 weeks agoBoxing: World champion Nick Ball set for Liverpool homecoming against Ronny Rios
-
News3 weeks agoNavigating the News Void: Opportunities for Revitalization
-
Technology4 weeks agoMicrophone made of atom-thick graphene could be used in smartphones
-
Sport3 weeks agoMan City ask for Premier League season to be DELAYED as Pep Guardiola escalates fixture pile-up row
-
Science & Environment1 month agoPhysicists have worked out how to melt any material
-
Science & Environment1 month agoWhy this is a golden age for life to thrive across the universe
-
Science & Environment1 month agoQuantum forces used to automatically assemble tiny device
-
News1 month ago▶️ Hamas in the West Bank: Rising Support and Deadly Attacks You Might Not Know About
-
Business3 weeks ago
DoJ accuses Donald Trump of ‘private criminal effort’ to overturn 2020 election
-
MMA3 weeks agoPereira vs. Rountree prediction: Champ chases legend status
-
News3 weeks ago‘Blacks for Trump’ and Pennsylvania progressives play for undecided voters
-
Sport3 weeks agoWales fall to second loss of WXV against Italy
-
MMA3 weeks agoDana White’s Contender Series 74 recap, analysis, winner grades
-
Sport3 weeks agoAaron Ramsdale: Southampton goalkeeper left Arsenal for more game time
-
Science & Environment1 month agoA slight curve helps rocks make the biggest splash
-
Technology1 month agoMeta has a major opportunity to win the AI hardware race
-
Science & Environment1 month agoITER: Is the world’s biggest fusion experiment dead after new delay to 2035?
-
Science & Environment1 month agoNerve fibres in the brain could generate quantum entanglement
-
Technology4 weeks agoRussia is building ground-based kamikaze robots out of old hoverboards
-
MMA3 weeks agoJulianna Peña trashes Raquel Pennington’s behavior as champ
-
Technology3 weeks agoMusk faces SEC questions over X takeover
-
Football3 weeks agoWhy does Prince William support Aston Villa?
-
Technology3 weeks agoThis AI video generator can melt, crush, blow up, or turn anything into cake
-
Sport3 weeks agoSturm Graz: How Austrians ended Red Bull’s title dominance
-
News3 weeks agoFamily plans to honor hurricane victim using logs from fallen tree that killed him
-
Science & Environment1 month agoHow to wrap your mind around the real multiverse
-
Science & Environment1 month agoNuclear fusion experiment overcomes two key operating hurdles
-
Technology1 month agoWhy Machines Learn: A clever primer makes sense of what makes AI possible
-
Science & Environment1 month agoTime travel sci-fi novel is a rip-roaringly good thought experiment
-
News1 month ago▶️ Media Bias: How They Spin Attack on Hezbollah and Ignore the Reality
-
Money3 weeks agoWetherspoons issues update on closures – see the full list of five still at risk and 26 gone for good
-
Technology3 weeks agoThe best budget robot vacuums for 2024
-
Technology3 weeks agoGmail gets redesigned summary cards with more data & features
-
Business3 weeks ago
Sterling slides after Bailey says BoE could be ‘a bit more aggressive’ on rates
-
Technology3 weeks agoMicrosoft just dropped Drasi, and it could change how we handle big data
-
Sport3 weeks agoChina Open: Carlos Alcaraz recovers to beat Jannik Sinner in dramatic final
-
MMA3 weeks agoPereira vs. Rountree preview show live stream
-
Sport3 weeks agoCoco Gauff stages superb comeback to reach China Open final
-
Entertainment3 weeks agoNew documentary explores actor Christopher Reeve’s life and legacy
-
Sport4 weeks agoWorld’s sexiest referee Claudia Romani shows off incredible figure in animal print bikini on South Beach
-
Business3 weeks ago
Bank of England warns of ‘future stress’ from hedge fund bets against US Treasuries
-
Business3 weeks agoChancellor Rachel Reeves says she needs to raise £20bn. How might she do it?
-
News3 weeks agoWoman who died of cancer ‘was misdiagnosed on phone call with GP’
-
Technology3 weeks agoTexas is suing TikTok for allegedly violating its new child privacy law
-
Technology3 weeks agoThe best shows on Max (formerly HBO Max) right now
-
Sport3 weeks ago2024 ICC Women’s T20 World Cup: Pakistan beat Sri Lanka
-
Technology3 weeks agoEpic Games CEO Tim Sweeney renews blast at ‘gatekeeper’ platform owners
-
Science & Environment3 weeks agoMarkets watch for dangers of further escalation
-
MMA3 weeks agoAlex Pereira faces ‘trap game’ vs. Khalil Rountree
-
News3 weeks agoGerman Car Company Declares Bankruptcy – 200 Employees Lose Their Jobs
-
MMA3 weeks agoUFC 307 preview show: Will Alex Pereira’s wild ride continue, or does Khalil Rountree shock the world?
-
MMA3 weeks ago‘I was fighting on automatic pilot’ at UFC 306
-
MMA3 weeks agoKetlen Vieira vs. Kayla Harrison pick, start time, odds: UFC 307
-
News1 month ago
the pick of new debut fiction
-
News1 month agoOur millionaire neighbour blocks us from using public footpath & screams at us in street.. it’s like living in a WARZONE – WordupNews
-
Football3 weeks agoSimo Valakari: New St Johnstone boss says Scotland special in his heart
-
Technology3 weeks agoJ.B. Hunt and UP.Labs launch venture lab to build logistics startups
-
News3 weeks agoHull KR 10-8 Warrington Wolves – Robins reach first Super League Grand Final
-
Technology3 weeks agoOpenAI secured more billions, but there’s still capital left for other startups
-
Business3 weeks ago
The search for Japan’s ‘lost’ art
-
Business3 weeks agoStark difference in UK and Ireland’s budgets
-
News3 weeks agoBalancing India and China Is the Challenge for Sri Lanka’s Dissanayake
-
News3 weeks agoHeavy strikes shake Beirut as Israel expands Lebanon campaign
-
TV3 weeks agoLove Island star sparks feud rumours as one Islander is missing from glam girls’ night
-
TV3 weeks agoPhillip Schofield accidentally sets his camp on FIRE after using emergency radio to Channel 5 crew
-
News3 weeks agoHeartbreaking end to search as body of influencer, 27, found after yacht party shipwreck on ‘Devil’s Throat’ coastline
-
Technology3 weeks agoPopular financial newsletter claims Roblox enables child sexual abuse
-
Business3 weeks ago
Head of UK Competition Appeal Tribunal to step down after rebuke for serious misconduct
-
Technology3 weeks agoApple iPhone 16 Plus vs Samsung Galaxy S24+
-
TV3 weeks agoMaayavi (මායාවී) | Episode 23 | 02nd October 2024 | Sirasa TV
-
Politics3 weeks ago
Rosie Duffield’s savage departure raises difficult questions for Keir Starmer. He’d be foolish to ignore them | Gaby Hinsliff
-
Health & fitness3 weeks agoNHS surgeon who couldn’t find his scalpel cut patient’s chest open with the penknife he used to slice up his lunch
-
Money3 weeks agoPub selling Britain’s ‘CHEAPEST’ pints for just £2.60 – but you’ll have to follow super-strict rules to get in
-
Technology3 weeks agoIf you’ve ever considered smart glasses, this Amazon deal is for you
-
News3 weeks agoLiverpool secure win over Bologna on a night that shows this format might work
-
Technology3 weeks agoAmazon’s Ring just doubled the price of its alarm monitoring service for grandfathered customers
-
Technology3 weeks agoHow to disable Google Assistant on your Pixel Watch 3
-
Business3 weeks ago
Can liberals be trusted with liberalism?
-
Technology3 weeks agoA very underrated horror movie sequel is streaming on Max
You must be logged in to post a comment Login