Connect with us

Business

Beijing uneasy with North Korean troops in Russia

Published

on

Even before Kim Jong Un sent troops to support Russia’s fight against Ukraine, there were signs that North Korea’s main backer, China, was unhappy with his regime’s deepening ties with Moscow.

In a letter last week seen as signalling Beijing’s growing displeasure, Chinese President Xi Jinping thanked Kim for a congratulatory message on the 75th anniversary of Communist China’s founding — but omitted a traditional reference to North Korea as a “friendly neighbouring country”.

Kim appears unabashed. Western allies this week revealed that North Korea had sent more than 12,000 troops, disguised as ethnic minorities from Siberia, to fight on Russia’s front lines, a move that analysts say will only heighten Beijing’s concerns over its neighbours’ increasingly cosy military ties.

“The North Korean troop deployment is a dramatic step, and China will not like it one bit,” said Andrei Lankov, a North Korea expert at Kookmin University in Seoul.

Advertisement

For China, the deployment — a sharp escalation in a partnership that has deepened since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022 but was previously largely limited to munitions — threatens to destabilise the delicate balance of power on the Korean peninsula.

Closer Russian-North Korean ties could also spur the US, Japan and South Korea to strengthen their military alliance in east Asia, which Beijing already views as aimed at containing its growing power.

Beijing wants to avoid at all costs a rerun of the early years of the cold war, when the Soviet Union, North Korea and China formed a “northern triangle” that faced off against a “southern triangle” of South Korea, Japan and the US, Chinese scholars said.

“China’s situation now is really difficult, genuinely a dilemma,” said Zhu Feng, executive dean of the School of International Studies at Nanjing University. “On the one hand, we don’t want to see the return of the cold war to east Asia. On the other hand, the US is trying to strengthen solidarity with South Korea and Japan.”

Advertisement

Japan’s chief cabinet secretary Yoshimasa Hayashi on Friday said that escalating Russian-North Korean co-operation was “deeply concerning” and would “worsen the situation in Ukraine and impact the security of the region around Japan”.

China’s wariness has been evident since April, when it sent one of its most senior officials, Zhao Leji, to Pyongyang. While the two sides did not reveal details of the talks, analysts said Beijing was unhappy about the prospect of losing influence over North Korea, which it sees as a crucial buffer state against US-backed South Korea. 

In June, Kim went further, agreeing a strategic partnership with Putin that contained a mutual assistance clause in cases of aggression against one of the signatories — a move that was of deep concern to China.

The following month, the Chinese ambassador to North Korea did not attend July anniversary commemorations in Pyongyang marking the end of the Korean war, despite the two countries marking 75 years of diplomatic relations this year.

Advertisement

China’s foreign affairs ministry on Thursday said Beijing was “not aware of the relevant situation” when asked about Pyongyang’s decision to send troops.

China’s concerns include becoming potentially embroiled in the conflict itself if North Korean troops’ involvement in the fight against Ukraine made the Asian country — Beijing’s only military alliance partner — a legitimate target for Kyiv, said Shen Dingli, a Shanghai-based international relations professor.

“China has a treaty-bound obligation to defend North Korea,” said Shen. “If North Korea is attacked, China is legally bound to send its troops and [if necessary] to use all means to protect North Korea.”

Some defence analysts have raised concerns that North Korea’s contribution to Russia’s war effort could mean Pyongyang has secured a reciprocal commitment from Moscow to intervene in a conflict on the Korean peninsula — a prospect that would alarm Beijing.

Advertisement

But Lankov said such a possibility remained “extremely remote”.

“The North Koreans are doing this for money, military technologies and battlefield experience, not out of any sense of solidarity with Russia,” he said. “Russia is not going to get themselves into trouble just out of gratitude to Kim Jong Un.”

China is also worried about Russia helping North Korea improve its nuclear capabilities, which could accelerate an arms race in the region, said Chen Qi at the Institute of International Relations at Tsinghua University in Beijing. Kim visited Russia’s Vostochny Cosmodrome, the country’s most advanced space rocket launch site, last year.

But Chen was sceptical Russia would prioritise its relations with North Korea over those with China, on which Moscow has relied for economic and geopolitical support since its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.

Advertisement

Some analysts said Beijing might be tolerating North Korean arms shipments to Russia to alleviate pressure to provide direct military assistance itself.

Jaewoo Choo, head of the China centre at the Korea Research Institute for National Security think-tank in Seoul, said “Beijing may actually be secretly pleased that Russia is providing economic aid to North Korea in China’s place”, at a time when China’s own domestic growth was lagging.

“China remains in the driving seat because ultimately it has control over both countries,” said Lankov, referring to Pyongyang’s reliance on aid from Beijing. “If China wanted to put a stop to this nonsense as they see it, then they could do so.”

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Leo Lewis in Tokyo

Source link

Continue Reading
Advertisement
Click to comment

You must be logged in to post a comment Login

Leave a Reply

Travel

Airport with UK flights to become ‘world-class’ with major new expansion plan and upgraded terminal

Published

on

Newark Liberty International Airport is set to undergo a huge revamp

AN AIRPORT in America that has cheap UK flights is set to undergo a huge renovation, aiming to provide passengers with a “world-class” experience when it’s complete.

Newark Liberty International Airport in New Jersey is set to undergo a major revamp.

Newark Liberty International Airport is set to undergo a huge revamp

2

Newark Liberty International Airport is set to undergo a huge revampCredit: Reuters

Earlier this week, the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey unveiled its vision for the airport.

Advertisement

The airport will be completely reimagined with modern terminals, a redesigned taxiway network anda new roadway network.

It is hoped that the redesigned taxiway will be able to reduce delays and accommodate more aircraft, increasing passenger capacity.

Newark’s Terminal B, which is regarded as one of the worst terminals in the country, will also be completely overhauled under the plans.

Improvements have also been outlined for the AirTrain, which connects the terminals to commuter trains.

Advertisement

Work on the $2 billion (£1.54 billion) AirTrain project is already underway.

Officials from New York and New Jersey have yet to reveal how much the entire expansion will cost and how long it will take to complete.

Port Authority Chairman Kevin O’Toole said: “A modern, efficient, world-class Newark Liberty Airport is more than just a dream.

“We now have an actionable path forward thanks to this comprehensive vision plan.

Advertisement

“As the blueprint shows, we’re ready to take a top-to-bottom look at everything from terminals to roadways to taxiways as we build EWR into a best-in-class global gateway and position it to continue serving as a vital economic engine for New Jersey and the region.”

The authority’s director of aviation redevelopment, Jacquelene McCarthy, told the New York Times: “A primary goal of the vision plan would be to deliver a world-class passenger experience.”

Hong Kong International Airport was recently crowned leading airport in Asia in the 2024 World Travel Awards

The news comes two years after Terminal A opened at Newark Liberty Airport.

Terminal A reportedly cost $2.7 billion to build and was recently given a five-star rating from Skytrax becoming the second airport terminal in north America to be given the rating.

Advertisement

Direct flights already operate from the UK to Newark Liberty Airport, with airlines like British Airways, Finnair and Iberia flying direct from London Heathrow.

Sun Online Travel have found return fares from £442 with Lufthansa, with return flights with British Airways costing £517.

UK AIRPORT REVAMPS

Meanwhile, several airports in the UK are also undergoing huge revamps to help improve passenger experiences.

One of those places is Bristol Airport where a huge five-year overhaul is set to take place.

Advertisement

The main improvement will be increasing the terminal size, which will increase by 70 per cent.

It follows a record number of people travelling through the airport, welcoming 10million passengers in a 12-month period for the first time ever.

More restaurants and larger lounges will be part of the terminal expansion.

It also means a larger baggage reclaim area as well as immigration area.

Advertisement

Meanwhile, Manchester Airport has been working on a huge £1.3billion transformation.

Now in its final phase, work is focusing on the east side of Terminal 2, including a second pier with additional boarding gates.

Construction work on the pier began back in June 2023, and it is nearly complete.

When the brand-new pier opens, it will double the aircraft capacity at Manchester Airport.

Advertisement

Three other new airports opening in Europe

HERE are three new airports opening in Europe.

Luis de Camoes Airport, Portugal

First discussed back in 2008, Lisbon has revealed plans for its new Luis de Camoes Airport. The £7billion airport will replace the current Lisbon Airport. The new travel hub will have two runways and welcome 100million passengers by 20250. Luis de Camoes Airport hopes to open in 2034.

Advertisement

Kastelli International Airport, Greece

Greece has revealed plans for a huge new £422million airport. Kastelli International Airport will become one of the largest in the country when it opens in Crete. The new airport will initially be able to welcome up to 10million passengers, when it opens in 2027.

New Bodø Airport, Norway

Norway is replacing its current Bodø Airport with the new £546million New Bodø Airport. The airport aims to be open by 2029, with the capacity to handle 2.3million passengers per year.

Advertisement

Doncaster Sheffield Airport, which closed in November 2022, could reopen thanks to a new multi-million-pound plan.

And Plymouth Airport hopes to reopen after being closed for more than a decade.

The renovation project will see improvements to a terminal building and the airport's taxiways

2

The renovation project will see improvements to a terminal building and the airport’s taxiwaysCredit: PAYNN

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

UK pledges thousands of new jobs in freeports plan

Published

on

UK pledges thousands of new jobs in freeports plan

The UK is to announce five new freeports and a new investment zone in the Budget next week as part of a bid to boost economic growth.

Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer said it is part of a plan to help create thousands of jobs and more trade in the UK.

Speaking to the BBC, Sir Keir said freeports – low tax zones – were “working well” despite criticism that they do not increase overall jobs numbers.

But he said “they could work better” with more involvement from local businesses and politicians.

Advertisement

Sir Keir acknowledged that freeports were a policy introduced by the Conservatives, but said he “didn’t want to take the ideological view that just because they were introduced by the last government we would stand them down”.

However, he said they need some improvements, including “better structures and more local authority involvement”.

Freeports are areas near shipping ports or airports where imported goods are free from taxes called tariffs that are normally paid to the UK government.

Firms in these areas also pay lower national insurance – another tax – on new employees, and lower property taxes.

Advertisement

The idea is that they boost economic activity like trade, investment and job creation.

Manufacturers in freeports only pay tariffs on finished products that leave the site for elsewhere in the UK.

And, imported goods can be re-exported overseas without UK duties being paid.

They are located around ports in Inverness, the Forth, Teeside, the Humber, Liverpool, Anglesey, Milford Haven, Plymouth, the Solent, the Thames, and Felixstowe and Harwich.

Advertisement

There is also a freeport near East Midlands airport which covers chunks of Leicester, Derby and Nottingham.

Critics have suggested, however, that they simply move economic activity or jobs from one part of the country to another, rather than creating new opportunities or roles.

Sir Keir said “that’s why we would do well to make some tweaks to freeports to make sure they work in their own right”.

He said Labour wanted to see growth plans “for every area, every place” drawn up by mayors, local authorities and local businesses, “so freeports don’t sit on their own as the only source of jobs and investment in a given area”.

Advertisement

He also said that a new investment zone in the East Midlands, which will aim to boost high tech green industry, was “really important”.

There are already two investment zones in the UK, which apply to specific local areas and see firms offered financial incentives.

“These zones attract investment, and they’re measured in tens of thousands of well-paid jobs, so this is really good news,” Sir Keir said.

He added that economic growth is the “number one mission of this government”.

Advertisement

However, the watchdog that looks at the government’s finances, the Office for Budgetary Responsibility predicted in 2021 that tax breaks in England’s freeports would cost the UK government £50m a year.

It said that historical evidence suggests their “main effect” would be to move economic activity from one place to another.

Internationally, freeports have also been linked to organised crime, money laundering, smuggling, and low wages, the Scottish Greens argued in 2023.

But according to the government, freeports in the UK have attracted £2.9bn of investment and created an estimated 6,000 jobs.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

Three directors appointed to The Pensions Regulator board

Published

on

Three directors appointed to The Pensions Regulator board

Three new permanent executive directors have been appointed to the board of The Pensions Regulator (TPR).

The appointments, which will “help deliver TPR’s new regulatory approach”, were approved by pensions minister Emma Reynolds.

The new directors are Nina Blackett, executive director of strategy, policy and analysis, Gaucho Rasmussen, executive director of regulatory compliance and Neil Bull, executive director of market oversight.

They will help accelerate the shift in TPR’s regulatory approach to meet the challenges and opportunities of a changing pensions market.

Advertisement

Blackett has served as both director of digital services and interim director of strategy, policy and analysis since joining TPR in September 2023.

She brings considerable experience in leading digital transformation in finance, healthcare and education to her new role.

Neil Bull has more than 25 years of experience in the commercial pensions sector and brings a deep understanding of the pensions market and risk management to the role.

He previously served as TPR’s head of investment before becoming interim director of market oversight in April 2024.

Advertisement

Gaucho Rasmussen is a regulatory and enforcement leader with extensive experience in organisational change and development.

He joins TPR from Amazon, where he has been advising on regulatory compliance across Europe.

Prior to this, Gaucho held positions as director of enforcement at both Ofcom and the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA).

TPR chief executive Nausicaa Delfas said: “The pensions market is rapidly changing and moving towards fewer, larger schemes, bringing new opportunities and new risks. We are evolving as a regulator to meet these challenges.

Advertisement

“Gaucho, Neil and Nina will each play a critical part in accelerating the shift in our regulatory approach that will help us to protect, enhance and innovate in a changing pensions market, and become a more efficient and effective regulator.”

In February, TPR announced the establishment of three new regulatory functions – regulatory compliance, market oversight and strategy, policy and analysis.

Source link

Advertisement
Continue Reading

Business

Tory treasurer’s water company in discussions to take stake in Thames Water

Published

on

Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

A water company co-founded by the treasurer of the Conservative party is in discussions to take a stake in Thames Water, which is looking to raise billions of pounds to avoid a potential renationalisation.

Castle Water — which acquired Thames Water’s corporate customers from the utility in 2017 — is looking at contributing new equity to bolster the balance sheet of the UK’s largest water utility, according to four people familiar with the matter. Castle Water is looking to take a controlling stake, one of the people has said.

Advertisement

Graham Edwards, who has donated millions of pounds to the Conservative party and serves as its treasurer, is one of Castle Water’s co-founders, directors and shareholders.

Castle Water recently signed a non-disclosure agreement to potentially provide new equity funding for Thames Water, the people familiar with the situation said, allowing the company to conduct due diligence on the utility’s private financial information.

Under Castle Water’s plans, shares in Thames Water would be publicly listed in two to three years to “bring the transparency that stock market-listed water companies deliver”, said one person close to the discussions. They added that Castle Water had funding in place for the equity raise and that it would bring in additional management capabilities for a turnaround of the troubled utility, which serves about 16mn customers in and around London.

The size of the stake under discussion is unclear but would be expected to give Castle Water control over the utility.

Advertisement

Thames Water is looking to raise as much as £3bn from new investors in this equity raise, overseen by investment bank Rothschild, after the pension and sovereign wealth funds that own the company declared it “uninvestable” and walked away from providing further funding in March.

The monopoly is also seeking an increase to its bills of 53 per cent in real terms by 2030 to enable it to raise the £3bn of funding it needs just to keep running and deliver infrastructure improvements.

Edwards co-founded Castle Water with its chief executive John Reynolds in 2014 to capitalise on the deregulation of the business water market, where companies other than the utilities were allowed to handle customer complaints, bills, meter readings and some operational issues.

Castle Water’s most recent accounts state that the company is ultimately controlled by a trust of which Edwards is a beneficiary. Accounts for WPGSS Limited, which is listed on Companies House as owning more than 50 per cent of Castle Water’s shares, also state that Edwards is its “ultimate controlling party” through a British Virgin Islands holding company.

Advertisement

Edwards is also the executive chair of TT Group, one of the UK’s largest privately held property companies, and has close ties to the real estate group’s owners, the billionaire Pears family.

Reynolds, Castle Water’s chief executive, is a former investment banker and a former member of the Water Industry Commission for Scotland. Reynolds also previously served as the chair of the Church of England Ethical Investment Advisory Group and is the author of the book Ethics in Investment Banking.

Separately to the equity raise, Thames Water on Friday said it was seeking to borrow £3bn from creditors to allow it to keep operating until October next year.

The proposals have been tentatively agreed with the creditors involved, who are the largest holders of some of Thames Water’s most senior debt and include hedge fund Elliott.

They would charge interest of 9.75 per cent a year on the funds, far above market rates for most loans, and would also be paid fees.

But Thames Water also needs a decisive majority of its other lenders to agree to extend existing debt by two years and to consent to the new loan arrangements.

Castle Water, Thames Water, the senior bondholders and the Conservative party declined to comment. Edwards did not immediately respond to a request seeking comment.

Advertisement

Additional reporting by Ivan Levingston in London

Source link

Continue Reading

Money

Toob app ‘down’ as thousands report issues with broadband provider and blast ‘useless’ internet

Published

on

Toob app 'down' as thousands report issues with broadband provider and blast 'useless' internet

THE Toob app is “down” as thousands report issues with the broadband provider and blast the “useless” internet.

Downdetector received more than 3,500 complaints about the service just before 12.25pm today.

The Toob app appears not to be currently working

1

The Toob app appears not to be currently working

The vast majority – 82 per cent – of those were to do with the internet.

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Business

Can I call you Rob?

Published

on

Stay informed with free updates

You will have noticed this seems a rather specific question, unrelatable perhaps, if your name is Dennis or Susan. But you will also grasp that this is just a way of expressing the real question, which is “Can I shorten your name from the one you actually use?” 

The answer is no, you bloody can’t. Well, technically you can. There’s nothing I can do to stop you. But I won’t like it, so if it is an attempt to be matey, it will in fact have the opposite effect. 

Advertisement

At least asking allows me an opportunity to say no. Those who ask are not really the problem, though they should still know better. I have, after all, had many more years to consider my options. But people rarely ask. Americans — or Amers, as I like to think of them — are especially committed to shortening other people’s names, seeing it as a sign of chummy informality, rather than an outrageous presumption. 

Few weeks go by without someone chummily shortening my name. They don’t ask if I’m a Rob. They just decide I should be. This shows a basic misjudgment because Rob, in general, seems an easy-going, karaoke-nights, one-more-for-the-road type of guy. Whereas I am an uptight, grumpy, no-thanks-I’m-driving, don’t-call-me-Rob type.

This issue has acquired new urgency, because one of the final two candidates to be Conservative leader has suddenly become a Rob. Robert Jenrick was always a Robert, until this contest. Now, he has come out as a Rob. Perhaps he was always a Rob to his most intimate circle, or alternatively it is just one more policy shift from a man of no fixed ideological moorings. When we first met Robert, he was a liberal-conservative Remainer. Rob, on the other hand, turns out to be obsessed with immigration, ending net-zero targets and ordering the removal of Disney murals at asylum reception centres. These don’t seem like Rob moves? Maybe it’s more a Bert thing.

Anyway, this isn’t a column about Bert Jenrick. He is embracing the name change, either because he thinks it makes him seem more likeable or to distance himself from the more liberal-elitist Robert. (There are rightwingers who worry that, having won as Rob, he might then revert to being Robert.) 

But it’s his choice. The issue is how to deal with others changing our name for us. You could just relax about it. But if I could be relaxed about it, I’d already be a Rob, wouldn’t I? 

The second strategy is to correct people. If it happens over email, you could sign off with your version of “Robert (not Rob)”, followed with a smiley face to show no offence has yet been taken. That could make you look a tad priggish, which is annoying since a) you are being priggish and no one likes to be told that, and b) you are not the one in the wrong here. But you need to nip it in the bud early. Procrastination robs you.

The third approach is to refuse to answer to the short name. In person, don’t respond. On a phone call, you suggest the person must have the wrong number. I did once work closely with a Rob, so I always told people they were obviously looking for him. But this is just a more aggressive version of the second strategy and an unnecessary escalation best saved for repeat offenders. 

Advertisement

We all have those we permit to Rob us. My oldest friend uses it but he’s been doing so since primary school, and five decades seems too long to have let it lie. Also, if I told him it annoyed me, he’d only double-down on it and probably switch to Robbie (a name acceptable only for Scots and toddlers). In any case, it is born of life-long friendship, and I’ve definitely called him worse. Relatives of my wife have also started doing it under the mistaken impression that association with her gives them renaming rights. Nicknames and variations on your surname are less of a problem, especially if they too were picked up in your youth, seem affectionate and aren’t rhyming slang for genitalia.

It’s not that I mind the name. It’s not unpleasant. I just associate it with people who don’t realise they are too old to be skateboarding. (I exempt my colleague Rob Armstrong, who is a top bloke in spite of his affliction.) Naturally, in revealing this I have opened myself up to years of Rob abuse. Then again, if Rob Jenrick wins, perhaps I’ll change my own name.

Email Robert at magazineletters@ft.com

Follow @FTMag to find out about our latest stories first and subscribe to our podcast Life and Art wherever you listen

Advertisement

Source link

Continue Reading

Trending

Copyright © 2024 WordupNews.com